The Complementarity Principle (CP), introduced by Nils Bohr, described the wave-particle duality of quantum phenomena and its dependence on the measurement setup exploring the quantum states. In general, this principle summarized the fact that two mutually exclusive and contradictory states of quantum events can be reconciled as a measurement-dependent occurrence of these states. Originally, the CP was postulated only for the realm of quantum mechanics, but recently the Generalized Quantum Theory (GQT) extended its area of applicability to the macroscopic domain. According to GQT complementarity relations are also hypothesized to exist between macroscopic objective and subjective measurements of the same concept. This implies objective measurement-dependent variations of subjective experience. To test this hypothesis, seven studies were conducted in which individual variations in subjective intelligence ratings were tested in relation to the availability or non-availability of corresponding objective individual intelligence data. Only one pre-registered study (Study 2) showed strong Bayesian evidence for H1 (BF10 > 10), indicating, as predicted, higher subjective intelligence ratings when objective data were erased compared to a condition in which objective data were available within a male sample. This effect could not be replicated in direct replication attempts, nor did a moderator search in subsequent studies find any robust systematic variation in the data. The results seem to question the validity of the macroscopic complementarity conjecture derived from the GQT. On the other hand, they could also be interpreted as the “effect and decline” data pattern that the Model of Pragmatic Information would predict when conducting empirical confirmations of macroscopic complementarity relations. Possible future research strategies to clarify these different interpretations are discussed.