General Practitioner Letter Research Articles

Post-surgical discharge opioid prescribing, use and handling after introduction of a stewardship program.

SummaryOpioids are often used to provide postsurgical analgesia but may cause harm if used inappropriately. We introduced an opioid stewardship program in three Melbourne hospitals to reduce the inappropriate use of opioids after patient discharge. The program had four pillars: prescriber education, patient education, a standardised quantity of discharge opioids, and general practitioner (GP) communication. Following introduction of the program, we undertook this prospective cohort study. The study aimed to describe post-program discharge opioid prescribing, patient opioid use and handling, and the impact of patient demographics, pain and surgical treatment factors on discharge prescribing. We also evaluated compliance with the program components. We recruited 884 surgical patients from the three hospitals during the ten-week study period. Discharge opioids were dispensed to 604 (74%) patients, with 20% receiving slow-release opioids. Junior medical staff undertook 95% of discharge opioid prescribing, which was guideline-compliant for 78% of patients. Of the patients discharged with opioids, a GP letter was sent for only 17%. Follow-up at two weeks was successful in 423 (70%) patients and in 404 (67%) at three months. At the three-month follow-up, 9.7% of patients reported ongoing opioid use; in preoperatively opioid naïve patients, the incidence was 5.5%. At the two-week follow-up, only 5% reported disposal of excess opioids, increasing to 26% at three months. Ongoing opioid therapy at three months in our study cohort (9.7%; 39/404) was associated with preoperative opioid consumption and higher pain scores at the three-month follow-up. The introduction of the opioid stewardship program resulted in highly guideline-compliant prescribing, but hospital-to-GP communication was uncommon and opioid disposal rates were low. Our findings suggest that opioid stewardship programs can improve postoperative opioid prescribing, use and handling, but the realisation of these gains will require effective program implementation.

Profile of people attending emergency departments with thoughts of self-harm and suicide: A descriptive study of a nurse-led programme in Ireland.

Increasing research has been conducted on individuals presenting with self-harm at emergency departments (EDs). However, less is known about individuals presenting to EDs with only self-harm ideation. We aimed to describe the characteristics of those attending Irish hospitals with self-harm ideation and investigate any differences in comparison to those presenting with suicide ideation. A prospective cohort study was conducted on Irish ED presentations due to suicidal and self-harm ideation. Data were obtained from the service improvement data set of a dedicated nurse-led National Clinical programme for the assessment of those presenting to Irish emergency departments due to Self-harm and Suicide-related Ideation (NCPSHI). A total of 10 602 anonymized presentation data were analysed from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019. Descriptive analysis was conducted to compare those with suicidal and self-harm ideation on sociodemographic and care interventions. Being female and aged <29 were more prevalent among the self-harm ideation presentations. Compared to the self-harm ideation group, a higher proportion of those with suicidal thoughts received an emergency care plan (63% vs 58%, p = 0.002) and General Practitioner letter sent within 24 h of presentation (75% vs 69%, p = 0.045). Little variation was found between hospitals for self-harm ideation in both years. Our study suggests that females and younger populations are more prevalent in hospital presentations due self-harm ideation, while presentations related to suicidal ideation are more often made by males and involving substance use. Attention should be given to the relationship between clinicians' attitudes towards care provision and the content of suicide-related ideation ED disclosure.

166 INAPPROPRIATE PRESCRIBING IN COMMUNITY-DWELLING OLDER ADULTS: A CROSS SECTIONAL REVIEW USING THE STOPP/START CRITERIA

Abstract Background Older adults are a heterogenous cohort of patients, often with multiple comorbidities and prescribed numerous drugs. Polypharmacy, defined as use of five or more medications, and inappropriate prescribing are risk factors for adverse outcomes. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment) are criteria that facilitate medication review in older people to aid better prescribing and health outcomes. This review aims to identify inappropriate prescribing in the community-dwelling older adult attending Integrated Care Programme for Older Persons (ICPOP). Methods We performed a cross-sectional review of patients attending the ICPOP Hub between January 2022 and May 2022. Patients’ prescriptions were obtained from pharmacies and/or General Practitioners (GP) and cross checked against the medications brought to their appointment. Patients’ past medical history was obtained from the patient, GP and hospital letters. Their prescriptions were analysed using the STOPP/START criteria. Results This study included 68 patients. The mean age was 83.5 years. Polypharmacy was present in 94%, with an average of 9.5 drugs prescribed. Common medications identified via STOPP criteria were hypnotic z-drugs in patients with falls (13.2%); loop diuretics for pedal oedema without heart failure (11.8%) and benzodiazepines for &amp;gt;4 weeks in patients with falls (10.3%). Common medications identified to commence via START criteria were vitamin D supplement in those with falls (32.4%); bone anti-resorptive therapy in those with osteoporosis (13.2%); laxatives in patients taking opiates (11.8%) and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in those with memory impairment (8.8%). 48 participants had medications commenced with 46 having medications stopped. Only 9 patients required no change to their medication prescription. Following STOPP/START, there was an overall reduction in prescribed medications by 0.12 (p=0.494). Conclusion Applying STOPP/START criteria lead to a reduction in inappropriate medications prescribed in our multi-morbid older people cohort while identifying appropriate treatments to improve health outcomes.

A balancing act: changing the referral pathway following remote consultations for dizziness during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

This paper reports our experience in managing dizzy patients remotely during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, and explored its safety as an alternative to face-to-face consultations. Dizzy patients referred by their general practitioner were contacted to answer a validated questionnaire. Clinicians recorded the time needed for consultations, and the diagnosis at each of the following assessment stages: after review of the electronic general practitioner letter; following completion of the questionnaire; following the telephone consultation; and/or at follow up. Patients were telephoned no earlier than three months later to determine satisfaction with the service and symptom resolution. Electronic patient records were checked for presentation to hospital because of dizziness. Seventy patients had telephone consultations. None presented to the emergency department or were admitted. The majority of consultations took 15-30 minutes. The most diagnosed condition was benign positional paroxysmal vertigo. Seventy-nine per cent of patients were satisfied with the service. The questionnaire and telephone consultations demonstrated the greatest diagnosis agreement (κ = 0.40). Validated questionnaire and telephone consultations are a safe alternative to face-to-face consultations. Our patient referral pathway has now changed to include elements of the questionnaire.

Structured follow-up pathway to support people after transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke (SUPPORT TIA): protocol for a feasibility study and process evaluation

IntroductionPeople who experience transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke have limited follow-up despite rapid specialist review in hospital. This means they often have unmet needs and feel abandoned following...

Irrational use of proton pump inhibitors in general practise.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are widely used among general practitioners (GP) and hospital doctors alike as a first-line agent for the management of various approved conditions. However, PPIs do have an established side-effect profile that can be over looked when prescribing these agents outside of their Food Drug Administration (FDA) indications. The aim of this audit is to establish that PPIs are often prescribed without any clear documented indication as to why, particularly in the elderly population, despite multiple previous studies conducted which showed an over-use of these medicines. We conducted a retrospective observational study of the patients admitted to an acute hospital in Ireland in February 2018. A cohort of patient charts were pulled from medical records and reviewed. Medical notes, GP letters, discharge summaries and prescriptions were reviewed in order to establish the primary indication for PPI prescription. One hundred seventy-four (n =174) inpatient records were randomly assessed during the audit. Of these patients, 85 of them were taking PPIs regularly. 54.7% (n =46) were prescribed a PPI without any documented indication. 46.4% (n =39) of these patients were > 75years of age. 54.7% (n =46) of patients were prescribed esomeprazole. The commonest indication for prescribing PPIs was to reduce the risk of gastric ulceration associated with NSAID use, which was 68.4% (n =26) of those who were prescribed a PPI in accordance with guidelines. Irrational prescribing of PPIs continues both in hospital and in general practise. It is imperative that the side-effects of these medicines are weighed against the benefit and cost effectiveness, especially in the elderly population where polypharmacy remains a substantial concern.

Accuracy of medication information sources compared to the best possible medication history for patients presenting to the emergency department.

To assess the accuracy of medication information sources available for adult patients presenting to the ED, compared to a best possible medication history (BPMH). This prospective observational study was undertaken in the ED of a major tertiary-referral teaching hospital. A convenience sample of consecutive adult patients taking one or more regular medications was included. A BPMH was ascertained using patient/carer interviews, where available, and confirmed with one or more other sources. For residential care facility (RCF) patients, the RCF medication chart and at least one other source were used. Information sources compared with the BPMH were community pharmacy dispensing history, patient's own medications, patient's medication list, general practitioner letter, medications stored in and labelled on dose administration aids (DAAs) and the RCF chart. Number of discrepancies per patient for each source was determined by comparing medications and dose regimens to those documented in the BPMH. A total of 455 patients (median age 71 years) took a median of six 'regular' and two 'as required' medications. The median number (range) of discrepancies per patient for regular medication names and dosages were RCF chart 0 (0-3), DAA contents 2.0 (0-9), patient's medication list 2.5 (0-16), DAA medications label 3.0 (0-7), community pharmacy history 3.0 (0-19), general practitioner letter 3.0 (0-18) and patient's own medications 4.0 (0-16). Overall, 40.4% of discrepancies were deemed 'moderate' or 'high' clinical significance. Omission errors accounted for 55.6% of discrepancies. A combination of sources is essential to determine the BPMH. RCF charts provided the most accurate information. Other sources had two to four regular medication-related discrepancies per patient.

Improving physical health monitoring for patients with chronic mental health problems who receive antipsychotic medications

Physical health monitoring is an integral part of caring for patients with mental health problems. It is proven that serious physical health problems are more common among patients with severe...

Effective Strategies to Recruit Young Adults Into the TXT2BFiT mHealth Randomized Controlled Trial for Weight Gain Prevention.

BackgroundYounger adults are difficult to engage in preventive health, yet in Australia they are gaining more weight and increasing in waist circumference faster than middle-to-older adults. A further challenge to engaging 18- to 35-year-olds in interventions is the limited reporting of outcomes of recruitment strategies.ObjectiveThis paper describes the outcomes of strategies used to recruit young adults to a randomized controlled trial (RCT), healthy lifestyle mHealth program, TXT2BFiT, for prevention of weight gain. The progression from enquiry through eligibility check to randomization into the trial and the costs of recruitment strategies are reported. Factors associated with nonparticipation are explored.MethodsParticipants were recruited either via letters of invitation from general practitioners (GPs) or via electronic or print advertisements, including Facebook and Google—social media and advertising—university electronic newsletters, printed posters, mailbox drops, and newspapers. Participants recruited from GP invitation letters had an appointment booked with their GP for eligibility screening. Those recruited from other methods were sent an information pack to seek approval to participate from their own GP. The total number and source of enquiries were categorized according to eligibility and subsequent completion of steps to enrolment. Cost data and details of recruitment strategies were recorded.ResultsFrom 1181 enquiries in total from all strategies, 250 (21.17%) participants were randomized. A total of 5311 invitation letters were sent from 12 GP practices—16 participating GPs. A total of 131 patients enquired with 68 participants randomized (68/74 of those eligible, 92%). The other recruitment methods yielded the remaining 182 randomized participants. Enrolment from print media was 26% of enquiries, from electronic media was 20%, and from other methods was 3%. Across all strategies the average cost of recruitment was Australian Dollar (AUD) $139 per person. The least expensive modality was electronic (AUD $37), largely due to a free feature story on one university Web home page, despite Facebook advertising costing AUD $945 per enrolment. The most expensive was print media at AUD $213 and GP letters at AUD $145 per enrolment.ConclusionsThe research indicated that free electronic media was the most cost-effective strategy, with GP letters the least expensive of the paid strategies in comparison to the other strategies. This study is an important contribution for future research into efficacy, translation, and implementation of cost-effective programs for the prevention of weight gain in young adults. Procedural frameworks for recruitment protocols are required, along with systematic reporting of recruitment strategies to reduce unnecessary expenditure and allow for valuable public health prevention programs to go beyond the research setting.Trial RegistrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12612000924853; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=362872 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6YpNfv1gI).

Psychosocial interventions for benzodiazepine harmful use, abuse or dependence.

Conclusion: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) plus taper is effective in the short term (three month time period) in reducing benzodiazepine (BZD) use. However, this is not maintained at six months and subsequently. The possibility of including a 'top-up' of CBT to sustain long term effects should be investigated. Currently there is insufficient evidence to support the use of Motivational Interviewing (MI) to reduce BZD use. There is some evidence to suggest that a tailored GP letter versus a general GP letter, standardised interview versus treatment as usual (TAU) and relaxation versus TAU could be effective for BZD reduction. There is currently insufficient evidence for other psychosocial approaches to reduce BZD use.

Health-related quality of life in women referred for bone density assessment: relationships with bone mineral density, fracture and co-morbidity.

To identify variables that might influence health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with and without a history of fracture, attending bone mineral density (BMD) assessment prior to diagnosis of osteoporosis. This cross-sectional study included 312 newly referred postmenopausal women attending for a DXA scan, without a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Data were obtained from the medical history and the General Practitioner's letter. HRQoL, using SF36 was scored using published algorithms with reference to an age-related population from England. Regression analyses were used to determine relationships between HRQoL and BMD, age, fracture status and co-morbidities. For all patients, the age-related physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores were 46 ± 10 and 47 ± 10, respectively. Controlling for confounding variables, low BMD at the femoral neck was associated with worse PCS scores (p = 0.010) and MCS scores (p = 0.034) in patients without fracture. In patients with a history of fracture, this relationship was less evident, and younger age (p < 0.00), increasing BMI (p = 0.016) and number of co-morbidities (p = 0.042) were associated with reductions in PCS scores. Patients referred for BMD assessment before a diagnosis of osteoporosis had reduced PCS scores. In patients without fracture, low BMD contributed to this reduction in health-related quality of life. Low PCS scores in patients with fracture were seen only in younger subjects with osteoporosis.

Development of an early nurse led intervention to treat children referred to secondary paediatric care with constipation with or without soiling

BackgroundConstipation is a common chronic childhood condition referred to secondary care. Effective treatment requires early intervention, prolonged medication to soften stools and behavioural support to achieve a regular habit of sitting on the toilet to pass a stool. The purpose of this audit and service development was to assess routine consultant paediatrician-led care against minimum standards and if appropriate to develop a nurse-led intervention. The new care package could then be tried out within general paediatric clinics in Glasgow as a service evaluation. NICE guideline (CG99) has a research recommendation to compare nurse-led care with routine consultant-led care.MethodsDesign was an audit then development of a nurse-led intervention followed by a service evaluation. Participants were children (age 0–13 years), referred by their General Practitioner (GP) to the Royal Hospital for Sick Children Glasgow, with constipation the main problem in the GP letter. The audit covered appointment waiting times, intervention provided, initial follow-up and parental satisfaction with routine consultant-led practice. The nurse-led intervention focused on self-help psychology practice with NICE guideline medical support. This was compared with routine consultant paediatrician care in a service evaluation.ResultsThe audit found consultant-led care had long waiting times, delayed initial follow-up and variable intervention. The new nurse-led intervention is described in detail. The nurse-led intervention performed well compared with consultant-led care. Less ‘nurse-led’ children, 3/45 (7%), were still constipated passing less than 3 stools per week compared with 8/58 (14%) receiving consultant-led care. Less ‘nurse-led’ parents, 10/45 (22%), reported their child having pain passing stools in the previous week compared with consultant-led care, 26/58 (45%). The proportion of children, over 4 years, free from soiling accidents was similar, 15/23 (65%) in the nurse-led group and 18/29 (62%) with consultant-led care. Parental satisfaction was slightly better in the nurse-led group.ConclusionIt is difficult to achieve minimum standards using routine consultant-led care for children referred by their GP with constipation. Nurse-led early intervention is feasible and has produced promising results in a service evaluation. An exploratory trial is planned to develop a teaching module, robust outcomes including costs and benefits, and methodology for a definitive trial recommended by NICE.

Exploring communications around medication review in community pharmacy

Investigation into aspects that influence outcomes of medication reviews have been called for. The aim of this study was to assess how pharmacy internship students in a Danish medication review and reconciliation model communicated with both diabetes patients and the patients' General Practitioners (GPs) when conveying the results of the review by writing letters to the different parties. Special attention was drawn to how differences in health care provider and patient perspectives of the disease as well as inclusion of the patient in the decision making process is influenced by the identified practices of communication. 18 Danish community pharmacies with The Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy at the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Copenhagen. Number of identified drug related problems, life-world problems and solutions to these described in the letters sent to patients and their GPs were registered. Further a qualitative documentary analysis was conducted by analyzing the letters using the theory of transactional analysis, developed by Berne. Identified and conveyed drug related and life-world related problems when comparing patients' letters with GPs' letters. Whether students assumed a superior, inferior or equal role in relation to the recipient of the letter and compared whether students assumed the same role in relation to patients and GPs. 18 pairs of patient and GP letters were analyzed. The analysis showed that students conveyed more drug-related problems to GPs than to patients. Furthermore, students assumed an equal relationship to GPs, whereas they frequently took superior positions when writing to patients. Students reported lifestyle problems both to GPs and to patients. Pharmacy students in a Danish medication review and reconciliation model managed to detect and address lifestyle problems of patients to their GPs, thereby facilitating the merger of their professional-technical perspective with the life-world perspective of patients. However, patients were not encouraged to become more involved in the disease management process.

Does dictating the letter to the GP in front of a follow-up patient improve satisfaction with the consult? A randomised controlled trial

Various studies have shown that receiving a copy of the letter to the General Practitioner (GP) improves patient satisfaction with the consult. We aimed to establish whether dictating the letter to the GP in front of a listening patient does likewise. Follow-up patients have shorter allotted consultation times. This may contribute to dissatisfaction, hence the choice of our target group. One hundred consecutive follow-up patients who met the eligibility criteria were randomised to listen to the GP letter or not. Immediately after the consult, they were asked to fill in a questionnaire which, in addition to enquiring about various aspects of the consult asked them to quantify their overall satisfaction by means of a ten-point graded visual analogue score. Forty-nine patients received dictation. The mean age and sex distribution of the two groups were matched. The median overall satisfaction in the dictation and non-dictation groups were ten and eight, respectively, this was statistically significant. There was no significant difference between patients' rating of whether the consult had addressed their ailment adequately, explanation(s) given or the length of consult. Sixty-one percent of patients in the non-dictation group would like to have listened to the dictation, whilst all patients in the dictation group found it useful. This study is the first of its kind in the ENT population. Dictating a letter to the GP in front of a listening patient led to a statistically significant improvement in satisfaction independent of possible confounding aspects of the consult.

Referral Letters for 2-Week Wait Suspected Colorectal Cancer do not Allow a ‘Straight-to-Test’ Pathway

Some clinicians have argued that 2-week wait suspected colorectal cancer patients can go 'straight-to-test' to facilitate time to diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the currently used referral letters are reliable enough to allow that pathway. General practitioner (GP) letters referring patients under the Two Week-Wait Rule for suspected colorectal cancer were prospectively reviewed over a 6-month period. Three examining consultants were asked to outline the tests they would perform having only read the letter, and then again after a clinical consultation with the patient. The outcome of these tests was tracked. A total of 217 referral letters of patients referred under Two Week Wait Rule for suspected colorectal cancer were studied. Having just read the referral letter, the most frequently requested test was colonoscopy (148), then CT scan (48), barium enema (44), followed by gastroscopy (23) and flexible sigmoidoscopy in 15 patients (some patients would have had more than one test requested). After consultation with the patients, tests requested as guided by the GP letter were changed in 67 patients (31%), where 142 colonoscopies, 61 CT scans, 37 barium enemas, 23 flexible sigmoidoscopies and 19 gastroscopies were organised. The referral indication which had tests changed most often was definite palpable rectal mass (67%), while patients referred with definite palpable right-sided abdominal mass had their tests least often changed (9%). A total of 22 patients were found to have colorectal cancers (10%) and 30 patients were diagnosed with polyps (14%). Out of 142 colonoscopies performed, 19 (13%) showed some pathology beyond the sigmoid colon and of the 23 patients who had flexible sigmoidoscopy initially, only three went on to have colonoscopy subsequently. During the 6-month period of the study, only five breaches of the waiting time targets were recorded (1 to the 31-day target and 4 to the 62-day target). A significant number of patients would have had tests changed after a clinical consultation. However, only a small number required further investigations having had a consultation prior to their initial investigations. We conclude that 2-week wait suspected colorectal cancer patients should be seen in the clinic first and should not proceed 'straight-to-test'.

Long‐term effectiveness of computer‐generated tailored patient education on benzodiazepines: a randomized controlled trial

Chronic benzodiazepine use is highly prevalent and is associated with a variety of negative health consequences. The present study examined the long-term effectiveness of a tailored patient education intervention on benzodiazepine use. A randomized controlled trial was conducted comprising three arms, comparing (i) a single tailored intervention; (ii) a multiple tailored intervention and (iii) a general practitioner letter. The post-test took place after 12 months. Five hundred and eight patients using benzodiazepines were recruited by their general practitioners and assigned randomly to one of the three groups. Two tailored interventions, the single tailored intervention (patients received one tailored letter) and the multiple tailored intervention (patients received three sequential tailored letters at intervals of 1 month), were compared to a short general practitioner letter that modelled usual care. The tailored interventions not only provided different and more information than the general practitioner letter; they were also personalized and adapted to individual baseline characteristics. The information in both tailored interventions was the same, but in the multiple tailored intervention the information was provided to the participants spread over three occasions. In the multiple tailored intervention, the second and the third tailored letters were based on short and standardized telephone interviews. Benzodiazepine cessation at post-test was the outcome measure. The results showed that participants receiving the tailored interventions were twice as likely to have quit benzodiazepine use compared to the general practitioner letter. Particularly among participants with the intention to discontinue usage at baseline, both tailored interventions led to high percentages of those who actually discontinued usage (single tailored intervention 51.7%; multiple tailored intervention 35.6%; general practitioner letter 14.5%). It was concluded that tailored patient education can be an effective tool for reducing benzodiazepine use, and can be implemented easily.

What do Patients Think about being Copied into their GP Letters?

Sending patients a copy of the letters that are produced for their referring general practitioners (GPs) from an out-patient consultation is a policy of the UK Department of Health. Little research has been done to establish how patients attending out-patient departments feel about this practice and the effect this may have on the department itself. We asked 500 patients attending our out-patient department to complete a questionnaire. Patients were only included if they had previously been offered a copy letter by our department. Of patients, 95% were in favour of the practice and 93.4% understood all or most of the contents of the letter. Dictation in front of the patients made them less likely to request a copy of the letter (P < 0.001). Impact of queries related to the letters was minimal with only three patients making contact with the department during the 3 months that the study was being conducted. Our experience has shown that copying patients into their GP letters is a useful and popular practice for patients and has little impact on the running of the department. Patients also are in favour of having their letter dictated in their presence and this reduces their need to have a copy sent to them.

A study of how urology out-patients like to receive clinical information.

As part of the NHS Plan the UK Department of Health has suggested that both patients and general practitioners (GPs) are written to following hospital consultations. We audited the responses of patients and GPs to this practice. A total of 160 patients in one consultant urologist's clinic were included. The consultant had never routinely copied GP letters to patients. The SpR in the same clinic had routinely done so in previous posts. Patients who had received letters (group A) and those who had not (group B) were asked to complete a postal questionnaire. GPs were also sent a questionnaire to assess their opinion. The responses were analysed. Questionnaires were sent out to patients (80 to group A and 80 to group B. From this, 100 (62.5%) responses were received (A 48 [60%]; B 52 [65%]). Of respondents, 81% were male. Overall, 98% of those patients who received a letter agreed with its contents, and stated they would keep the letter and take it to a subsequent doctor's appointment. Of respondents, 83% (A) and 96% (B) had never received a doctor's letter before but 83% (40 [83%, A], 43 [83%, B]; P > 0.05) of respondents would like to receive doctors' letters in the future. some 22 GP practices received and completed questionnaires at a PCT meeting and 74% of GPs agreed with the practice of copying patients their letters. The results of this study suggest that patients should be offered a copy of their letter and that their response should be documented in the notes. This may serve to improve communication with the patient but should not be undertaken without their agreement.

Relations entre médecin traitant et médecin réanimateur : l'opinion des réanimateurs de huit départements du sud de la France

Objectives. – Assessment of relationship between general practitioners and intensivists. Study design. – Intensivists were questioned by phone from June 14th to September 28th 2004. Methods. – 245 out of 264 intensivists from 8 French Southern regional areas were questioned concerning their relationship with critically ill patients' general practitioner. Results. – Patients were mainly admitted into Intensive care Unit (ICU) from the Emergency Department (55%). An information letter from the general practitioner was reported for 20% of admitted patients but 50% of these letters was assumed as not informative. The informations concerning the patient's medical history, therapies, and disease leading to admission and the patient's status were assessed with 6.5, 7.0, 6.0 and 2.0, respectively (maximal note = 10). The intensivists contacted the general practitioner for 30% of admitted patients. During the stay in ICU, 33% general practitioners were reported to request informations by phone or visit in ICU. When the stay in ICU was > 10 days, the general practitioner was nearly never regularly informed about patient's status. When the patient was discharged from the ICU, 80% of intensivists used an exhaustive typed report to inform the general practitioner. The overall relationship between the general practitioner and the intensivist was assessed as 5.5/10. Insufficient information in the general practitioner's letter at admission, the lack of request for information during the stay in ICU, the lack of contact with the general practitioner by the intensivist and an intensivist's age between 46 and 55 were associated with a relationship assessment < 4/10).

Using evidence-based dissemination and implementation strategies to improve routine communication between general practitioners and community mental health teams

Aims and MethodTo improve the quality of written communication between general practitioners (GPs) and community mental health team (CMHT) members concerning patients newly referred to two inner-city CMHTs. Following a benchmark audit of a random sample of referral and assessment letters, locally agreed good practice protocols were shared widely, accompanied by a dissemination and implementation strategy.ResultsSignificant improvements occurred in both GP and CMHT letters; these were most dramatic after 1 year, but tailed off considerably in the second year despite continued efforts to implement the protocols' standards.Clinical ImplicationsPlanned dissemination and implementation strategies can help to improve routine clinical communication between CMHTs and GPs through the use of good practice protocols, thus improving shared working between primary and secondary care providers.