General Practitioners Encounter Research Articles

Can General Practitioner Opioid Prescribing to Compensated Workers with Low Back Pain Be Detected Using Administrative Payments Data? An Exploratory Study.

Approximately one third of Australians with accepted time loss workers' compensation claims for low back pain (LBP) are dispensed opioid analgesics. Structured administrative payments data is scalable but does not directly link opioids to prescribers. We sought to determine whether opioid prescribing by general practitioners (GPs) to workers with workers' compensation claims for LBP can be detected in structured administrative payments data. We used a sample of workers with accepted time loss workers' compensation claims for low back pain from 2011 to 2015 from the Australian states of Victoria and South Australia. We structured administrative data to test the assumption that opioid dispenses that occurred immediately after a GP encounter in sequence and occurred on the same date as the GP encounter are likely to be related. We measured the number and proportion of opioid dispenses with a GP encounter prior and the days between a GP encounter and opioid dispense. Nearly one third of workers (32.2%, N = 4,128) in our sample (n = 12,816) were dispensed opioids a median of five times (interquartile range 2, 17). There were 43,324 opioid dispenses to included workers. 30,263 (69.9%) of opioid dispenses were immediately preceded by a GP encounter. Of those dispenses, 51.0% (n = 15,443) occurred on the same day as the GP encounter. At least one third of opioids dispensed to workers with claims for LBP can be potentially linked to GP prescribing using workers' compensation structured administrative payments data. This approach could have potential applications in supporting monitoring and audit and feedback systems. Future research should test this approach with a more diverse array of pain medicines and medical practitioners.

Descriptive study of general practitioner's practices and knowledge about Parkinson's disease in the north of France

BackgroundParkinson's disease (PD), the second most frequent neurodegenerative disease, constitutes a major public health challenge. A guide published by the French National Authority for Health in 2012 and revised in 2016 put forward recommendations for general practitioners (GP) planning care pathways for parkinsonian patients. It is well known that PD can be difficult to diagnose, and that when patients consult their GP, symptoms are often still limited and embedded in clinical uncertainty. This means the pathway to confirmed diagnosis of PD can be lengthy and uncertain. Consequently, it is important to identify the difficulties GPs encounter when caring for PD patients in order to help them better close the gaps in care strategies. MethodsWe conducted a descriptive cross-sectional survey in northern France to evaluate GP practices and knowledge about PD and their accordance with care pathway recommendations. The survey was conducted using a 30-item questionnaire sent to a sample of GPs. ResultsThere were 164 GPs who responded to the study questionnaire. The responding GPs generally followed current care pathway recommendations. In presence of a parkinsonian syndrome, 93.3% of the GPs reported systematically looking for an iatrogenic cause; 57.4% did not announce the diagnosis without the advice of a neurologist; 97.6% referred patients to a neurologist when they suspected PD; and 80.5% asked the neurologist to modify treatments. Our findings also revealed some difficult aspects of GP practices: only 2.5% had had additional training in neurology; only 53.6% felt comfortable with the diagnosis of PD; 63.6% prescribed additional exams for the diagnosis; most of the GPs were unaware of second-line treatments and their indications, and finally existence of PD expert centers was unknown for 85.2%. ConclusionsThese findings could be useful to guide implementation of new measures supporting more holistic care for PD patients; PD expert centers in France could provide complementary information and training for GPs.

Role ofUnit Physicians andChallenges Encountered inthe Follow-up ofMilitary Personnel with Cancer.

General practitioners (GPs) play a central role in the management and coordination of care of patients with malignant tumors and blood diseases. Civilian GPs encounter certain difficulties during the care of such patients. The practice of unit medicine in a military environment differs from that in a civilian context through expertise in fitness to serve and to deployment and the target population. We identified the difficulties encountered by "unit" physicians during and after cancer treatment. We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional descriptive study from July 2, 2021, to September 30, 2022, targeting all military GPs belonging to the French Armed Forces Health Service. We sent a questionnaire consisting of 1 open- and 16 closed multiple-choice questions describing the population of unit physicians and their patients (questions 1-5), the difficulties encountered by physicians in the follow-up of military personnel with cancer (Questions 6, 7, 11, 12, and 13), and the potential information networks accessible to physicians (questions 8-10, 14, and 17). Three hundred and ninety physicians completed the questionnaires. Among the 700 military GPs, 390 physicians responded to the questionnaire and 327 completed it exhaustively. The questionnaire response rate was 55%. Of the responding physicians, 49% and 70% reported following patients with an "active" malignant tumor and a malignant tumor pathology in remission, respectively. Thirty-one percent of the physicians encountered difficulties with these patients as follows: 26% concerning fitness for duty, 17% in medical follow-up, 14% in addressing the psychological aspect, 11% concerning specialist accessibility for advice, 10% in managing deconditioning to effort, 9% in addressing the social aspect, 7% in medical management, and 6% concerning other issues. Difficulties in the follow-up of patients with cancer affect military doctors. They mainly concern fitness for duty and medical follow-up.

Multimorbidity in elderly people living with HIV: how do general practitioners manage?

The occurrence of multimorbidity concerns more and more people living with HIV (PLWHIV) and its frequency increases with age. General practitioners should occupy a central place in the out-of-hospital follow-up of elderly PLWHIV with multimorbidities. Our study aims to understand the actual position of general practitioners and the barriers they encounter in the management of elderly PLWHIV with multimorbidities. This sub-study of the ANRS EP66-SEPTAVIH sancillary tudy, which assesses frailty in PLWHIV aged 70 years and over, is based on in-depth interviews with general practitioners and PLWHIV aged 70 years and over. The data were processed manually. Themes and sub-themes were identified and tabulated before being subjected to a cross-sectional thematic analysis. Based on 30 interviews conducted between April 2020 and June 2021 with 10 general practitioners and 20 PLWHIV aged 70 years and over and with multiple diseases, this study identifies the difficulties that general practitioners encounter in fully participating in the care. The follow-up of these patients is characterized by symbolic partitions between groups of professionals: organizational fragmentation between general practitioners and specialists, fear of encroaching on the role of the other health professionals, and frequent absence of formalization of roles in the coordination of care. In order to promote optimal follow-up and improve the experience of elderly PLWHIV, it is important that the role of each stakeholder be better defined for better shared follow-up.

The effect of physician density on colorectal cancer stage at diagnosis: causal inference methods for spatial data applied on regional-level data

BackgroundThe early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) through regular screening decreases its incidence and mortality rates and improves survival rates. Norway has an extremely high percentage of CRC cases diagnosed at late stages, with large variations across municipalities and hospital catchment areas. This study examined whether the availability of physicians related to CRC primary diagnosis and preoperative investigations, or physician density, contributes to the observed geographical differences in late-stage incidence rates.MethodMunicipality-level data on CRC stage at diagnosis were obtained from the Cancer Registry of Norway for the period 2012–2020. Physician density was calculated as the number of physicians related to CRC investigations, general practitioners (GPs) and specialists per 10,000 people, using physician counts per municipality and hospital areas from Statistics Norway. The relationship was examined using a novel causal inference method for spatial data—neighbourhood adjustment method via spatial smoothing (NA approach)—which allowed for studying the region-level effect of physician supply on CRC outcome by using spatially referenced data and still providing causal relationships.ResultsAccording to the NA approach, an increase in one general practitioner per 10,000 people will result in a 3.6% (CI −0.064 to −0.008) decrease in late-stage CRC rates. For specialists, there was no evidence of a significant correlation with late-stage CRC distribution, while for both groups, GPs and specialists combined, an increase of 1 physician per 10,000 people would be equal to an average decrease in late-stage incidence rates by 2.79% (CI −0.055 to −0.001).ConclusionThe study confirmed previous findings that an increase in GP supply will significantly improve CRC outcomes. In contrast to previous research, this study identified the importance of accessibility to both groups of physicians—GPs and specialists. If GPs encounter insufficient workforces in hospitals and long delays in colonoscopy scheduling, they will less often recommend colonoscopy examinations to patients. This study also highlighted the efficiency of the novel methodology for spatially referenced data, which allowed us to study the effect of physician density on cancer outcomes within a causal inference framework.

A Case Study Over Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris Through Ayurvedic Management

Skin disorder are common manifestation in present era and more so frequent in elder age. The patient of skin disease is more prone to experience physical, emotional and socio-economic embarrassment in the society due to disfigured appearance. Normally 10-15% of the general practitioners encounter with skin disorder in there day to day practice. Vaipadeeka and Charma kustha is a type of Kshudra kustha occurring mainly due to the imbalance of Vata and Kapha doshas resembling the Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris in its clinical manifestation. Pityriasis rubra pilaris is rare chronic disorder that causes hyper keratotic yellowing of the skin including trunk, extremities and particularly palm and sole. The palm and sole become thickened smooth and yellow fissure are common. Systemic corticosteroid, oral retinoid, immunosuppressive such as cyclosporine are the mainstay of treatment of Pityriasis rubra pilaris. The modern treatment modalities are not devoid from grave complication mainly in long term use. Owning these reasons, there is need for treatment having good efficacy and no toxic profile. So this case study was conducted considered ptyriasis rubra pilaris as Charma kustha and Vaipadeeka. Ayurvedic management was planned accordingly. Good result was witness by Virechan and shaman.

Management of Hallux Valgus in General Practice in Australia.

To describe the management of hallux valgus by general practitioners (GPs) in Australia. We analyzed data from the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health program from April 2000 to March 2016. Patient and GP encounter characteristics were extracted. Hallux valgus encounters were identified using the International Classification of Primary Care, Version 2 Plus terms hallux valgus and bunion. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals around point estimates. The data set included 1,568,100 patient-encounter records among which hallux valgus was managed 658 times (4.2 management occasions per 10,000 encounters). This management rate extrapolates to an estimated 60,000 GP-patient encounters across Australia in the most recent year data were available (from 2015 to 2016). The management rate was 3 times higher in female compared to male patients and was most frequent among patients ages 45-64 years. Hallux valgus was most frequently managed by referral to orthopedic surgeons (28 per 100 management occasions), counseling or advice (25 per 100), and referral to podiatrists (16 per 100). Pharmacologic management was also frequently used (20 per 100) and primarily involved prescription of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (7 per 100). Hallux valgus is a commonly encountered problem in Australian general practice and is mostly managed by provision of advice and referral to orthopedic surgeons and podiatrists. Further research is required to examine the factors that influence the selection of surgical and nonsurgical treatment pathways by GPs and their comparative effectiveness.

Specyfika nauki o płci – seksuologii i zarys jej historii

In family medicine, an important group of issues are those in the field of sex science or sexology. General practitioners encounter in their practice issues related to regularities and disorders of sexual development in the sphere of both somatic and mental health. Both men and women entrust their doctors with their sexual problems. It is advisable that the medical history conducted by a general practitioner should be extended to include sexological aspects. Unfortunately, the lack of proper health and sex education is still a problem. Sexological issues are taboo for many patients. Meanwhile, although sexology is a relatively young discipline, it has its own history Four periods can be distinguished in the development of sexology: I. The prehistoric period, characterised by little information about sexual life of people in prehistoric times; II. The period of pre-scientific observations and inquiries, which ended at the turn of the 18th and 19th centuries; III. The period of "pre-sexological" knowledge, in which sexology was not separated from other sciences; IV. The period of sexological knowledge, in which sexology gained the rank of an independent discipline due to theoretical foundations and the development of scientific methodology.

Management of foot/ankle osteoarthritis by Australian general practitioners: an analysis of national patient-encounter records

To document the management of foot/ankle osteoarthritis/arthritis (OA) by general practitioners (GP) in Australia. We analysed data from the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health Program April 2010-March 2016 inclusive. Patient and GP encounter characteristics were extracted. Data were classified by the International Classification of Primary Care, Version 2, and summarised using descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) around point estimates. The dataset included 583,900 patient-encounter records among which foot/ankle OA was managed 621 times, at a rate of 1.1 per 1000 encounters, with an annual estimated 152,000GP encounters nationally. The management rate was most frequent among patients aged 65-74years (2.25 per 1000 encounters). Comorbidities were managed at a rate of 105.8 per 100 encounters, the most common being hypertension, and few being other musculoskeletal problems. Foot/ankle OA was mostly managed using medication (64.6 per 100 problems), with prescription rates far exceeding non-pharmacological strategies such as counselling, advice or education (17.7 per 100), or allied health referral (10.1 per 100). When considering specific health/medical professionals, patients were referred to orthopaedic surgeons 8.4 times per 100 foot/ankle problems, podiatrists 6.3 times per 100 foot/ankle problems, and physiotherapists 2.6 times per 100 foot/ankle problems. Pharmacological management rates of foot/ankle OA were high and substantially exceeded non-pharmacological management such as lifestyle advice and allied health referral. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of this care compared to self-management and conservative non-drug treatment in people with foot/ankle OA.

Depression and Anxiety identified to be the Most Commonly Reported Mental Health problems by General Practitioners

Introduction: General practitioners (GPs) regularly provide care for adult patients with psychological/psychiatric problems and prescribe appropriate medications (either independently or in consultation with a psychiatrist). Objectives: We established a list of the most common mental health problems GPs encounter during daily practice and suggested solutions to increase their competence in identifying and selecting appropriate treatments. Methods: We designed and conducted a voluntary survey; we collected data from 55 outpatient GPs at multiple outpatient clinics in Novi Sad, Serbia, which has a Universal Health Care System. Collected data were analyzed using including descriptive and analytical statistics. Results: Psychological/psychiatric problems were most commonly identified during GPs’ interviews with patients (70.9%) and by utilizing evidence-based behavioral health-screening instruments. Anxiety (80.0%) and depression/depressed mood (78.2%) were the two most frequently reported problems. To increase competence in diagnosing and treating patients with psychological/psychiatric problems, 76.3% of GPs identified the need for additional educational opportunities that address psychotropic medications used for depression, and 54.5% identified the need for topics related to initiating and managing antidepressant therapy. Conclusions: The most common psychological/psychiatric problems that GPs encounter in their practice are anxiety and depression. To increase competency in treating these problems, GPs will benefit from additional learning opportunities and training related to assessment and pharmacological treatment of patients with depression and anxiety disorders.

Empathy in general practice-the gap between wishes and reality: comparing the views of patients and physicians.

Empathy is regarded by patients and general practitioners (GPs) as fundamental in patient-GP communication. Patients do not always experience empathy and GPs encounter circumstances which hamper applying it. To explore why receiving and offering empathy during the encounter in general practice does not always meet the wishes of both patients and GPs. A qualitative research method, based on focus group interviews with patients and in-depth interviews with GPs, was carried out. Within the research process, iterative data collection and analysis were applied. Both patients and GPs perceive a gap between what they wish for with regard to empathy, and what they actually encounter in general practice. Patients report on circumstances which hamper receiving empathy and GPs on circumstances offering it. Various obstacles were mentioned: (i) circumstances related to practice organization, (ii) circumstances related to patient-GP communication or connectedness, (iii) differences between the patient's and the GP's expectations, (iv) time pressure and its causes and (v) the GP's individual capability to offer empathy. When patients do not receive empathy from their GP or practice staff, they feel frustrated. This causes a gap between their expectations on the one hand and their actual experiences on the other. GPs generally want to incorporate empathy; the GP's private, professional and psychological well-being appears to be an important contributing factor in practicing empathy in daily practice. But they encounter various obstacles to offer this. It is up to GPs to take responsibility for showing practice members the importance of an appropriate empathical behaviour towards patients.

Development of a meta-algorithm for guiding primary care encounters for patients with multimorbidity using evidence-based and case-based guideline development methodology

ObjectiveThe study aimed to develop a comprehensive algorithm (meta-algorithm) for primary care encounters of patients with multimorbidity. We used a novel, case-based and evidence-based procedure to overcome methodological difficulties in...

Diagnostic triage for low back pain: a practical approach for primary care.

Diagnostic triage is an essential guideline recommendation for low back pain (LBP), which is the most frequent musculoskeletal condition that general practitioners encounter in Australia. Clinical diagnosis of LBP - informed by a focused history and clinical examination - is the key initial step for GPs, and determines subsequent diagnostic workup and allied health and medical specialist referral. The goal of diagnostic triage of LBP is to exclude non-spinal causes and to allocate patients to one of three broad categories: specific spinal pathology (<1% of cases), radicular syndrome (∼ 5-10% of cases) or non-specific LBP (NSLBP), which represents 90-95% of cases and is diagnosed by exclusion of the first two categories. For specific spinal pathologies (eg, vertebral fracture, malignancy, infection, axial spondyloarthritis or cauda equina syndrome), a clinical assessment may reveal the key alerting features. For radicular syndrome, clinical features distinguish three subsets of nerve root involvement: radicular pain, radiculopathy and spinal stenosis. Differential diagnosis of back-related leg pain is complex and clinical manifestations are highly variable. However, distinctive clusters of characteristic history cues and positive clinical examination signs, particularly from neurological examination, guide differential diagnosis within this triage category. A diagnosis of NSLBP presumes exclusion of specific pathologies and nerve root involvement. A biopsychosocial model of care underpins NSLBP; this includes managing pain intensity and considering risk for disability, which directs matched pathways of care. Back pain is a symptom and not a diagnosis. Careful diagnostic differentiation is required and, in primary care, diagnostic triage of LBP is the anchor for a diagnosis.

Disentangling the concept of "the complex older patient" in general practice: a qualitative study.

BackgroundThe rising life expectancy in the developed world leads to an increase in the number of older patients and the complexity of their complaints in general practice. Although interventions and support for general practitioners are available, implementation lags. Knowledge on what determines a complex older patient, the problems of which general practitioners encounter and the situations they actually need support for, is necessary for better implementation.MethodsTo provide support to general practitioners in their struggle with complex older patients, the aim of this research was to disentangle the concept of the complex older patient in general practice. A qualitative approach was used consisting of 15 semi-structured interviews with general practitioners. The general practitioner was asked to prepare a case of a complex older patient out of their own practice that could be discussed during the interview. Transcripts of the interview were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.ResultsAnalysis of the interviews resulted in twelve themes that could be categorised into five factors that contribute to the complexity of cases of older patients. The five factors are: not being in charge, different views on necessary care, encountering the boundaries of medicine, limits to providing social care, ill-equipped.ConclusionThe factors that were found imply that a better organisational structure for elderly care and consulting elderly care physicians could support general practitioners in providing care for older complex patients. Furthermore, understanding the current concept of patient autonomy seems unjustified in cases of complex older patients.

A Systematic Review of Training to Improve Melanoma Diagnostic Skills in General Practitioners.

Australia has the highest incidence of melanoma in the world. General practitioners encounter melanoma in 9.9 per 10,000 clinical encounters and play a key role in diagnosis. A systematic review was conducted to study the efficacy of training methods to improve general practitioners' diagnostic skills in melanoma. Article abstracts (1307) were screened, from a Medline search. Four trials met our criteria and were highly variable in their intervention methods and outcome measures. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess study quality with only one good, one poor, and two of questionable quality. Our results showed limited evidence via one study that training of general practitioners in surface microscopy improved melanoma diagnosis, from a clinical (naked eye) pre-intervention score of 54.6% to a post-intervention surface microscopy score of 75.9% in 74 general practitioners. Future work should explore the barriers to implementing this strategy in clinical practice.

Management of Osteoarthritis in General Practice in Australia

To describe management of osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip (OA-hip) and knee (OA-knee) by Australian general practitioners (GPs). We analyzed data from the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health program, from April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2010. Patient and GP characteristics and encounter management data were extracted. Data were classified by the International Classification of Primary Care, version 2, and summarized using descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals around point estimates. There were 489,900 GP encounters at which OA was managed (rate of 26.4 per 1,000 encounters). OA-hip was managed at a rate of 2.3 per 1,000 encounters (n = 1,106, 8.6% OA) and OA-knee at a rate of 6.2 per 1,000 (n = 3,058, 23.7% OA). The encounter management rate per 1,000 for OA-hip was higher among non-metropolitan dwellers (2.85 per 1,000 versus 1.97 per 1,000) and lower for non-English-speaking people (1.53 per 1,000 encounters versus 2.39 per 1,000). The rate for OA-knee was higher for non-English-speaking background (8.50 per 1,000 encounters versus 6.24 per 1,000) and lower among indigenous people (3.16 per 1,000 encounters versus 6.46 per 1,000). Referral to an orthopedic surgeon was the most frequently used nonpharmacologic management (OA-knee 17.4 per 100 contacts and OA-hip 17.7 per 100), followed by advice, education, and counselling. As first-line treatment, medication prescription rates (OA-knee 78.7 per 100 contacts and OA-hip 73.2 per 100) were substantially higher than rates of lifestyle management (OA-knee 20.7 per 100 contacts and OA-hip 14.8 per 100). OA-hip and OA-knee encounters and management differ. Nonpharmacologic treatments as first-line management were low compared with pharmacologic management rates, and surgical referral rates were high. However, lack of longitudinal data limits definitive assessment of appropriateness of care.

Factors Affecting Dementia Screening by General Practitioners in Community-dwelling Elderly Populations

In patients aged 75 years and above, dementia is associated with increased expenditure and high morbimortality. Although the incidence of dementia is well known, it is often underrecognized in primary care. We conducted a cross-sectional study in 2 areas in the southeast of France to identify the factors affecting dementia-screening implementation by the French general practitioners (GPs). In May 2008, an anonymized survey was sent by e-mail and/or post to all GPs with a large clinic practice. Two months later, reminder letters were sent. Overall, 493 GPs answered (26.8%) to self-reported behavior. Of these, 73.2% felt that annual screening was useful, although only 24.5% implemented it each year and 17.5% implemented it every 2 to 5 years. Factors that favorably influenced screening practices were: the older age of the GPs; belief in the usefulness of annual dementia screening; increased frequency of follow-up visits by elderly patients; and the proportion of dementia in the GP's practice. The main barrier to annual screening was the social problems encountered in the medical care of 75-year-old patients. Regardless of the differences in European national health policies or health care systems, all GPs encounter the same difficulties when dealing with elderly dementia patients.

What makes up good consultations? A qualitative study of GPs' discourses.

BackgroundIn medical literature, several principles that define ‘good consultations’ have been outlined. These principles tend to be prescriptive in nature, overlooking the complexity of general practitioners (GPs)’ perspectives of everyday practice. Focusing on perspectives might be particularly relevant, since they may affect decisions and actions. Therefore, the present study adopts a bottom-up approach, analyzing GPs’ narratives about ‘good’ and ‘bad’ consultations. We aimed at describing the range of discourses GPs use in relating on their practice.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 Belgian GPs. By means of a qualitative analysis, the authors mapped patterns in the interview narratives and described the range of different discourses.ResultsFour discourses were identified: a biomedically-centered discourse, a communication-focused discourse, a problem-solving discourse and a satisfaction-oriented discourse. Each discourse was further specified in terms of predominant themes, problems the GPs prefer to deal with and inherent difficulties. Although most participants used elements from all four discourses, the majority of the GPs relied on an individual set of predominant discourses and focused on a limited number of themes.ConclusionThis study clearly indicates that there is no uniform way in which GPs perceive clinical practice. Each of the participants used a subtle mix of different criteria to define good and bad medical consultations. Some discourse elements appear to be rooted in medical literature, whereas others are of a more personal nature. By focusing on the limitations of each discourse, this study can shed new light on some of the difficulties GPs encounter in their daily practice: being confronted with specific problems might be an effect of adhering to a specific discourse. The typification of different discourses on consultations may function as a framework to help GPs reflect on how they perceive their practice, and help them manage some of the challenges met in daily practice.

Mast cell tumors in cats: clinical update and possible new treatment avenues.

Feline mast cell tumors (MCTs) are frequently encountered in general practice. MCTs are the most common splenic tumor, second most common skin tumor and third most common intestinal tumor in cats. Treatment and prognosis can vary dramatically with location and histologic classification. While a cytologic or histologic diagnosis is often easy to obtain, the various histologic classifications, lack of a relevant grading scheme, and disparity in behavior depending on anatomic location make prognostication for cases of feline MCTs confusing. This is quite different from canine MCTs, where there is an established grading system which correlates clinically with prognosis and an accepted standard of care. Due to its prevalence, general practitioners encounter MCTs regularly. In many instances, referral for diagnosis and treatment is not necessary. Historically, there has been limited clinical evidence upon which to determine optimal treatment of MCTs in cats. Most recommendations are based on limited case reports or retrospective studies. With the recent introduction of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors to the veterinary market, there has been new research on the use of these drugs in cats, and new treatment options are on the horizon.

Acute pain management in general practice: steps to effective pain control

Pain is one of the most common complaints that general practitioners encounter in everyday practice. The swift and effective management of pain is a medical mandate, not only to fulfil an ethical obligation to the patient, but also to prevent long-term complications, such as chronic pain. General practitioners are often required to manage mild-to-moderate pain, and have multiple pain management treatments available to them. The challenge is to tailor a treatment plan to suit the individual requirements of each patient. In this paper, we will explore how best to manage acute mild-to-moderate pain in general practice in a logical stepwise approach.