Group Of General Practitioners Research Articles

Intercontinental translatability of a peer-led GP education model from New Zealand to the United Kingdom: a pilot study.

Pegasus Small Group education for General Practitioners (GPs) is a professional development programme that has been delivered in Canterbury, New Zealand for over 30 years. Peer developed content is delivered in small groups supporting interactive discussions informed by evidence and locally relevant data. An international collaboration between South Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) in the UK and Pegasus Health in Canterbury New Zealand aimed to determine whether the Canterbury model of Small Group (SG) professional development for GPs was transferrable to the South Tyneside context. This was a pilot qualitative study testing proof of concept for the Pegasus Small Group GP education model of professional development in another country. To test the concept, three pilot sessions on Persistent Pain, Screening, and Optimising Treatment were delivered between November 2021, and March 2022. Four UK GPs were trained as SG leaders and a member of the Pegasus team liaised with various UK GPs in South Tyneside to adapt topics for the local context. The use of videoconferencing (MSTeams, Zoom) to deliver support, training, and the programme itself had been developed and refined in the pandemic so that it could be run entirely online without losing its core components or interactive nature. Thirty-one, 50 and 61 GPs respectively from the 68 registered GPs attended the three sessions, 90% of whom rated the overall quality as good or excellent. These results and other positive feedback from attendees provided a mandate for a further extension over the following months. The pilot proved the potential for health systems to collaborate globally despite geographical distance. A wider evaluation to assess the impact of the education initiative is needed to determine the impact on patient care and to demonstrate the benefits of supporting the small group peer education model.

Collective Intelligence Increases Diagnostic Accuracy in a General Practice Setting.

General practitioners (GPs) work in an ill-defined environment where diagnostic errors are prevalent. Previous research indicates that aggregating independent diagnoses can improve diagnostic accuracy in a range of settings. We examined whether aggregating independent diagnoses can also improve diagnostic accuracy for GP decision making. In addition, we investigated the potential benefit of such an approach in combination with a decision support system (DSS). We simulated virtual groups using data sets from 2 previously published studies. In study 1, 260 GPs independently diagnosed 9 patient cases in a vignette-based study. In study 2, 30 GPs independently diagnosed 12 patient actors in a patient-facing study. In both data sets, GPs provided diagnoses in a control condition and/or DSS condition(s). Each GP's diagnosis, confidence rating, and years of experience were entered into a computer simulation. Virtual groups of varying sizes (range: 3-9) were created, and different collective intelligence rules (plurality, confidence, and seniority) were applied to determine each group's final diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy was used as the performance measure. Aggregating independent diagnoses by weighing them equally (i.e., the plurality rule) substantially outperformed average individual accuracy, and this effect increased with increasing group size. Selecting diagnoses based on confidence only led to marginal improvements, while selecting based on seniority reduced accuracy. Combining the plurality rule with a DSS further boosted performance. Combining independent diagnoses may substantially improve a GP's diagnostic accuracy and subsequent patient outcomes. This approach did, however, not improve accuracy in all patient cases. Therefore, future work should focus on uncovering the conditions under which collective intelligence is most beneficial in general practice. We examined whether aggregating independent diagnoses of GPs can improve diagnostic accuracy.Using data sets of 2 previously published studies, we composed virtual groups of GPs and combined their independent diagnoses using 3 collective intelligence rules (plurality, confidence, and seniority).Aggregating independent diagnoses by weighing them equally substantially outperformed average individual GP accuracy, and this effect increased with increasing group size.Combining independent diagnoses may substantially improve GP's diagnostic accuracy and subsequent patient outcomes.

Skin Cancer Referrals by Non-Medical Practitioners: A Prospective Observational Study.

The aim of this study was to investigate the appropriateness of suspected skin cancer referrals made by non-medical practitioners (NMPs) and compare this to referrals made by local General Practitioners (GPs). Data were collected prospectively from patients referred to a UK hospital dermatology department from primary care. The profession of the referrer was ascertained from review of referral letters and direct questioning. Patient records and subsequent histology reports were reviewed to determine ultimate diagnosis. 668/753 patients (88.7%) were referred by GPs versus 85/753 (11.3%) by NMPs. 340/668 (50.1%) of patients in the GP group and 47/85 (55.3%) in the NMP group were discharged without intervention (p = 0.45). An ultimate diagnosis of skin malignancy was made in 196/668 (29.3%) patients in the GP and 25/85 (29.4%)) in the NMP group (p = 0.99). These early data suggest significant potential for NMPs to become more involved in skin lesion assessment.

A comparison between veterinary small animal general practitioners and emergency practitioners in Australia. Part 2: client-related, work-related, and personal burnout.

Burnout is reported to be common among veterinarians. However, there is limited research investigating the relationship between specific types of veterinary practice and burnout. A previous study found significant differences in work exposures between veterinary general practitioners (GPs) and emergency practitioners (EPs). The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether Australian veterinary EPs suffer from a higher level of burnout compared to veterinary GPs. The secondary aim of this study was to explore if the previously reported differences between GP and EP groups were positively associated with burnout. An anonymous, online survey incorporating the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) was administered to veterinary GPs and EPs practicing in metropolitan regions of Australia. In total, 320 responses were analysed (n = 237, 74.2% GPs and n = 83, 25.9% EPs). Both groups suffered from moderate levels of burnout, but there were no significant differences in the severity of CBI burnout scores between the two groups. From the multivariable analysis four investigated factors were found to be significantly associated (p < 0.05) with the work-related CBI subscale: frequency of finishing work on time; adequate staffing; work satisfaction and seriously considering leaving their principal area of practice. Five factors were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with the client-related CBI subscale: position in practice; frequency of client adherence; work satisfaction; frequency of interacting with emotionally distressed clients and seriously considering leaving their principal area of practice. Four factors were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with the personal burnout CBI subscale: gender; seriously considering leaving their principal area of practice; frequency of interacting with emotionally distressed clients and the workplace environment. The total burnout score was also significantly associated (p < 0.05) with four factors: position in practice, workplace environment, appropriate staffing in the past week and client adherence. Future studies should focus on investigating effective strategies to mitigate these risk factors for both GPs and EPs, to reduce career attrition.

Clinical effectiveness of patient-targeted feedback following depression screening in general practice (GET.FEEDBACK.GP): an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, three-arm, observer-blinded, randomised controlled trial in Germany

Screening for depression in primary care alone is not sufficient to improve clinical outcomes. However, targeted feedback of the screening results to patients might result in beneficial effects. The GET.FEEDBACK.GP trial investigated whether targeted feedback of the depression screening result to patients, in addition to feedback to general practitioners (GPs), leads to greater reductions in depression severity than GP feedback alone or no feedback. The GET.FEEDBACK.GP trial was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, three-arm, observer-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Depression screening was conducted electronically using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in 64 GP practices across five regions in Germany while patients were waiting to see their GP. Currently undiagnosed patients (aged ≥18 years) who screened positive for depression (PHQ-9 score ≥10), were proficient in the German language, and had a personal consultation with a GP were randomly assigned (1:1:1) into a group that received no feedback on their depression screening result, a group in which only the GP received feedback, or a group in which both GP and patient received feedback. Randomisation was stratified by treating GP and PHQ-9 depression severity. Trial staff were masked to patient enrolment and study group allocation and GPs were masked to the feedback recieved by the patient. Written feedback, including the screening result and information on depression, was provided to the relevant groups before the consultation. The primary outcome was PHQ-9-measured depression severity at 6 months after randomisation. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted for patients who had at least one follow-up visit. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03988985) and is complete. Between July 17, 2019, and Jan 31, 2022, 25 279 patients were approached for eligibility screening, 17 150 were excluded, and 8129 patients completed screening, of whom 1030 (12·7%) screened positive for depression. 344 patients were randomly assigned to receive no feedback, 344 were assigned to receive GP-targeted feedback, and 339 were assigned to receive GP-targeted plus patient-targeted feedback. 252 (73%) patients in the no feedback group, 252 (73%) in the GP-targeted feedback group, and 256 (76%) in the GP-targeted and patient-targeted feedback group were included in the analysis of the primary outcome at 6 months, which reflected a follow-up rate of 74%. Gender was reported as female by 637 (62·1%) of 1025 participants, male by 384 (37·5%), and diverse by four (0·4%). 169 (16%) of 1026 patients with available migration data had a migration background. Mean age was 39·5 years (SD 15·2). PHQ-9 scores improved for each group between baseline and 6 months by -4·15 (95% CI -4·99 to -3·30) in the no feedback group, -4·19 (-5·04 to -3·33) in the GP feedback group, and -4·91 (-5·76 to -4·07) in the GP plus patient feedback group, with no significant difference between the three groups (global p=0·13). The difference in PHQ-9 scores when comparing the GP plus patient feedback group with the no feedback group was -0·77 (-1·60 to 0·07, d=-0·16) and when comparing with the GP-only feedback group was -0·73 (-1·56 to 0·11, d=-0·15). No increase in suicidality was observed as an adverse event in either group. Providing targeted feedback to patients and GPs after depression screening does not significantly reduce depression severity compared with GP feedback alone or no feedback. Further research is required to investigate the potential specific effectiveness of depression screening with systematic feedback for selected subgroups. German Innovation Fund. For the German translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Childhood obesity prevention in general practice: supporting implementation through co-ideation.

Childhood obesity is associated with physical and psychological complications thus the prevention of excess weight gain in childhood is an important health goal. Relevant to the prevention of childhood obesity, Australian general practice-specific, preventive care guidelines recommend General Practitioners (GPs) conduct growth monitoring and promote a number of healthy behaviours. However, challenges to providing preventive care in general practice may impact implementation. In October and November, 2022, a series of three workshops focusing on the prevention of childhood obesity were held with a group of Australian GPs and academics. The objective of the workshops was to determine practical ways that GPs can be supported to address barriers to the incorporation of obesity-related prevention activities into their clinical practice, for children with a healthy weight. This paper describes workshop proceedings, specifically the outcomes of co-ideation activities that included idea generation, expansion of the ideas to possible interventions, and the preliminary assessment of these concepts. The ecological levels of the individual, interpersonal, and organisation were considered. Possible opportunities to support childhood obesity prevention were identified at multiple ecological levels within the clinic. The preliminary list of proposed interventions to facilitate action included GP education and training, clinical audit facilitation, readily accessible clinical guidelines with linked resources, a repository of resources, and provision of adequate growth monitoring tools in general practice. Co-ideation with GPs resulted in a number of proposed interventions, informed by day-to-day practicalities, to support both guideline implementation and childhood obesity prevention in general practice.

Using a mobile application to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing for older Brazilian adults in primary care: a triple-blind randomised clinical trial

BackgoundPotentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) has been evaluated in several countries, and several strategies have been devised for deprescribing drugs in older adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a mobile application in reducing PIP for older adults in primary care facilities in Brazil.MethodsThis randomised, triple-blind, parallel-group trial was conducted in 22 public primary care facilities in Brazil. During the intervention phase, the general practitioners (GPs) were randomly allocated to the intervention (MPI Brasil app provides information about PIP, therapeutic alternatives and deprescribing) or control (MedSUS app provides general information about medications) group. All GPs were trained on the Clinical Decision-Making Process and how to access an Evidence-Based Health website. The GPs received an Android tablet with an installed mobile application depending on their allocated group, which they used when caring for older patients over at least 3 months. At the end of this period, a sample of older patients aged ≥ 60 years who had been awaiting medical consultation by the participating GPs were interviewed and their prescriptions analysed. The primary outcome was the frequency of PIP in and between the groups.ResultsAmong 53 GPs who were administered the baseline survey, 14 were included in the clinical trial. At baseline, 146 prescriptions were analysed: the PIP overall was 37.7% (55/146), in the intervention group was 40.6% (28/69), and in the control group was 35.1% (27/77). After the intervention, 284 prescriptions were analysed: the PIP overall was 31.7% (90/284), in the intervention group was 32.2% (46/143), and in the control group was 31.2% (44/141) (RR: 1.16; 95% CI, 0.76–1.76). In the within-group analysis, the PIP reduced from before to after the intervention in both groups—more significantly in the intervention than in the control group (p < 0.001). In the stratified analysis of PIP frequency by GPs, there was a relative risk reduction in 86% (6/7) of GPs in the intervention group compared to 71% (5/7) in the control group.ConclusionWe found that the MPI Brasil app effectively reduced PIP, suggesting that it may be useful to incorporate this tool into clinical practice.Trial registrationThe study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02918643). First registration on 22/09/2016.

PA and NP general practice employment in the Netherlands.

General practitioners (GPs) are the cornerstone of primary healthcare in the Netherlands. As a national strategy, physician associates/assistants (PAs) and NPs were introduced to address growing healthcare demand. In this study, four representative practices were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively-two solo practices with a PA or NP and two group practices with a PA or NP. A reference group of GPs served as experts. The annual encounters per full-time GP averaged 6,839; for the NPs, 2,636; and the PAs, 4,926. Billable services were 70% to 100%, averaging 71% for NPs and 85% for PAs, and in three of the four practices, the employment of the NP or PA was cost-efficient. The qualitative data show that PAs and NPs contribute to general practice, easing the workload so that the GP has more time for complex patients. PA and NP employment was financially beneficial in 75% of cases.

Assessing the mediating role and multiple group analysis in physicians’ habit persistence toward prescribing behavior using SmartPLS software

PurposeAlthough there is evidence that the efforts of pharmaceutical marketing exert a positive and significant influence on physician prescription decisions, the specific mechanisms by which this impact occurs remain uncertain. To address this issue, this study aims to investigate whether the physician’s habit persistence may explain the relationship between marketing efforts such as brand attributes and drug promotion and prescribing behavior. This study also explores whether there was any significant difference between specialists and general practitioners (GPs) regarding the effect of brand attributes and drug promotion on physician’s habit persistence, which influences prescribing behavior.Design/methodology/approachA survey instrument was administered to physicians, encompassing specialists in a particular field and GPs who provide primary care services. A nonparametric partial least squares multigroup analysis was used to analyze 393 valid responses using partial least squares-structural equation modeling.FindingsThe results indicate that the decision to prescribe the drug may be affected by the physician’s habit persistence in the presence of vital brand attributes and drug promotion. The relationship between physician’s habit persistence and prescribing behavior is significant in GPs and specialist groups. The findings also reveal that brand attributes are the most influential and significant determinant of physician’s habit persistence in the GPs group. In addition, physician specialists are more aware of the influence of drug promotion initiatives than GPs. Furthermore, this study discovered that the relationship between drug promotion and physician’s habit persistence indicates a significant difference between specialists and GPs.Originality/valueAlthough several marketing scholars discuss the factors influencing prescribing behavior, a few studies have shown the role of brand attributes and drug promotion and their effect on physician’s habit persistence. This study will specifically contribute by examining the mediating role of physician’s habit persistence between marketing efforts and prescribing behavior. In addition, so far, no studies have effectively made a comparative analysis across physicians regarding the effect of marketing efforts on physician’s habit persistence and prescribing behavior.

Impact of a deprescribing tool on the use of sedative hypnotics among older patients: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial in Swiss primary care (the HYPE trial)

IntroductionBenzodiazepines and other sedative hypnotics (BSH) are potentially inappropriate and harmful medications in older people due to their higher susceptibility for adverse drug events. BSH prescription rates are constantly high...

Analysis on the relationship between professional identity and turnover intention among general practitioners: The mediating role of job burnout

ObjectiveWe aimed to understand the current situation and contributory factors associated with professional identity, turnover intention and job burnout among general practitioners (GPs) in eastern, central and western China. MethodsA total of 3244 GPs from community health service institutions in 12 provinces of China were recruited, from October 2017 to February 2018. Demographic information such as sex, region and mode of employment was sought, and issues regarding job burnout, professional identity and turnover intention of GPs were measured with the corresponding scale, and softwares such as SPSS and AMOS were used. T-test, analysis of variance, and covariance matrix were used for analysis. ResultsThe average total scores of job burnout, turnover intention and professional identity of GPs in China were 44.12, 15.07 and 51.23, respectively. The results of intermediary effect analysis showed that in the GPs group, there were differences in the distribution of the three indicators. Professional identity had a significant negative effect on job burnout (β = −0.373), while job burnout had a significant positive effect on turnover intention (β = 0.528), and job burnout had an indirect effect in the relationship between professional identity and turnover intention. Job burnout played an intermediary role in professional identity and turnover intention. ConclusionsThe turnover intention of GPs in China has improved, but it is still at a high level. Job burnout plays an intermediary role between professional identity and turnover intention.

Exploring the experiences of general practitioners working with patients who use performance and image enhancing drugs

ObjectiveMedical practitioners such as general practitioners (GPs) may have an underutilized role when it comes to addressing the associated harms among people who use performance and image enhancing drugs (PIEDs) such as anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS). However, consumers report not accessing this group due to the perception they lack knowledge, and medical practitioners often report having a negative view of this group. The aim of this study was to investigate the experiences of Australian GPs with patients who use PIEDs such as AAS MethodA purposive sample of participants was recruited via research contacts and strategic announcements through GP groups and medical boards. Participants were also recruited through snowball sampling. Interviews were conducted online. A semi-structured interview schedule was utilised. The data were analysed thematically using an inductive approach. FindingsSix participants were recruited. Three themes emerged; these were: (1) Knowledge, support and training, challenges: “Better prepared than what I am”; (2) Ethical conflicts: “The difficulty lies in the conflict”; and (3) Poly drug use: “It's a bit intersectoral”. ConclusionsGPs feel inadequately prepared to provide services to this unique cohort of substance consumers and suggest there are specific challenges which intersect with ethics and legality, which make this an even more complex cohort. PIED consumers which access GPs may also be engaging in polysubstance use, although the temporal order of this relationship is still unclear.

An international survey of current management practices for polymyalgia rheumatica by general practitioners and rheumatologists.

To explore current management practices for PMR by general practitioners (GPs) and rheumatologists including implications for clinical trial recruitment. An English language questionnaire was constructed by a working group of rheumatologists and GPs from six countries. The questionnaire focused on: 1: Respondent characteristics; 2: Referral practices; 3: Treatment with glucocorticoids; 4: Diagnostics; 5: Comorbidities; and 6: Barriers to research. The questionnaire was distributed to rheumatologists and GPs worldwide via members of the International PMR/Giant Cell Arteritis Study Group. In total, 394 GPs and 937 rheumatologists responded to the survey. GPs referred a median of 25% of their suspected PMR patients for diagnosis and 50% of these were returned to their GP for management. In general, 39% of rheumatologists evaluated patients with suspected PMR >2 weeks after referral, and a median of 50% of patients had started prednisolone before rheumatologist evaluation. Direct comparison of initial treatment showed that the percentage prescribing >25 mg prednisolone daily for patients was 30% for GPs and 12% for rheumatologists. Diagnostic imaging was rarely used. More than half (56%) of rheumatologists experienced difficulties recruiting people with PMR to clinical trials. This large international survey indicates that a large proportion of people with PMR are not referred for diagnosis, and that the proportion of treatment-naive patients declined with increasing time from referral to assessment. Strategies are needed to change referral and management of people with PMR, to improve clinical practice and facilitate recruitment to clinical trials.

How general practitioners perceive the aging trajectory of oldest-old - A qualitative study

BackgroundA new population of older people is growing: the oldest-old. The care of the oldest-old (individuals aged 90 and over) is a new challenge in primary care. This study aimed to analyze the perception of General Practitioners (GP) on (1) the aging process of their patients up to a very advanced age, (2) how to adapt their practice to the care of these patients.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study using focus group (face to face) and individual (video call) interviews of GPs in southwest France. The sampling was purposive. We analyzed the interviews using an inductive approach based on the phases of thematic analysis. We used researchers’ triangulation during the process. Collection was concluded when saturation was reached.ResultsThree focus groups and one individual interview were conducted with a total of seventeen general practitioners. GP perception concerning aging and very advanced age were based on their personal experience and their daily clinical practice. Aging was perceived as an individual, unconscious, unpredictable and irreversible phenomenon. The shift towards “very old age” appeared inevitable. It could be a physical or psychological shift, or patients neglecting themselves or lacking a project. The care of the oldest-old became more specific and individual, adapted to the wishes of the patient. Those adaptations involve medical disengagement to focus on the most essential outcomes. The objectives of health care needed to be less strict with limited invasive practices. Prevention needed to focus mainly on prevention of falls and limitation of functional decline.ConclusionGPs identified an inevitable and unpredictable shift from old age to very old age. The adaption of the theory of disengagement allowed us to identify a medical disengagement of the GPs in the care of their oldest patients.

Communicating medical information with Aboriginal patients: lessons learned from GPs and GP registrars in Aboriginal primary health care.

Aboriginal culture stands as the oldest continuous culture in the world. It gives paramount importance to a harmonious balance between personal connections to the body, spirit, and mind, as well as collective relationships with family, land, and community, integral to the wellbeing of Aboriginal people. However, obstacles can emerge for patients due to language barriers, cultural differences, or a historical lack of trust in the healthcare system. The establishment of Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs) has undoubtedly improved the healthcare experience for Aboriginal patients, yet there is limited research on the specific approaches utilised by general practitioners (GPs) working in these clinics. Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with two groups of GPs working in Aboriginal health. Each GP was presented with three scenarios and asked questions related to each scenario. Braun and Clarke's method of thematic analysis was applied to transcribed interviews. Patient-doctor relationship, health literacy, and engagement with the health system emerged as key factors influencing communication with Aboriginal patients. Experienced GPs, despite differing clinical backgrounds, shared concise yet similar ideas to their less experienced counterparts. Notably, experienced GPs prioritised non-medical conversations and mindful body language, emphasising the importance of building strong patient relationships over other consultation aspects. This research provides initial insights for GPs in Aboriginal health, comparing experienced GPs with more than 10years experience to novices. However, further research involving Aboriginal patients is needed to validate GP strategies and understand their significance from the patients' perspective.

A national study of burnout and spiritual health in UK general practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic.

To quantify the burnout and spiritual health of general practitioners (GPs) in the United Kingdom (UK) who worked during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Online survey, April/May 2021, distributed via emails to general practices, Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), Health boards, Clinical Research Networks, professional groups, social media GP groups and networks. United Kingdom. 1318 GPs who had worked in the National Health Service (NHS) during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 -May 2021). Burnout scores, measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) for Medical Personnel; spiritual health, measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being, Non-Illness (FACIT-SP-NI). 19% of surveyed GPs were at the highest risk for burnout, using accepted MBI 'cut off' levels. There was no evidence of a difference in burnout by gender, ethnicity, or length of service. GP burnout was associated with GP spiritual health, regardless of identification with a religion. GPs with low spiritual health were five times more likely to be in the highest risk group for burnout. Burnout is at crisis levels amongst GPs in the UK NHS. A comprehensive response is required, identifying protective and precipitating factors for burnout. The potentially protective impact of spiritual health merits further investigation.

Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial

IntroductionIn settings where the private sector constitutes a larger part of the health system, profit-gathering can take primacy over patients’ well-being. In their interactions with pharmaceutical companies, private general practitioners...

Primary care screening and prevention of heart failure coordinated by cardiologist in rural areas

Abstract Purpose Current guidelines do not support community-wide screening for undetected asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), reduced (HFrEF), mid-range (HFmrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) heart failure (HF), either with natriuretic peptides (NTproBNP) or open access echocardiography (echo). Universal access to NTproBNP testing (with reimbursement in primary care) before referral for tissue doppler and speckle-tracking echo may be needed to facilitate HF diagnosis at earlier, more treatable stage. Methods 4376 consecutive patients (pts) were referred from January 2015 by general practitioners (GP) to echolab with suspected HF symptoms (unexplained breathlessness or ankle swelling). After confirmation elevated NTproBNP (&amp;gt;400 pg/mL) and MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) 5-year HF risk score ≥10 points and after exclusion significant valvular disease and abnormal electrocardiogram or chest x-ray in subgroup of randomly selected 829 asymptomatic elderly (≥65 years) pts (age 71±4 years, 48% women) with continued usual care by GP was compared with randomly selected 833 asymptomatic elderly pts from 5 GP practices in rural areas with prospective follow-up by regional cardiologist. Results At referral in both groups were similar baseline characteristics, 14% pts were treated with ACE-inhibitor (ACEi), 5% beta-blockers (BB) and 39% loop-diuretics. After cardiologist consultation loop-diuretics withdrawn in 90% pts, ACEi and BB use increased significantly to 98% and 82% in both groups (all p&amp;lt;0.001). Global LVSD (EF≤50%) was detected in 5% at baseline and 23% pts after 5 years in GP group, respectively 5.4% at baseline and 7% after 5 years in cardiologist group (p&amp;lt;0.001). Systolic dysfunction (S'≤6.0 cm/s) occurred in 14% at baseline and 38% pts after 5 years in GP group, respectively 15% at baseline and 21% after 5 years in cardiologist group (all p&amp;lt;0.001). Reduced global longitudinal (GLS&amp;lt;16%) observed in 20% at baseline and 51% pts after 5 years in GP group, respectively 21% at baseline and 29% after 5 years in cardiologist group (all p&amp;lt;0.001). At baseline we found 0.5% pts with new-onset HF in both groups (only HFmrEF). After mean follow-up of 54±4 months in cardiologist group developed new HF in 3% pts (1% HFmrEF, 2% HFpEF) compared with 19% pts (3% HFrEF, 7% HFmrEF, 9% HFpEF) in GP group (p&amp;lt;0.001). Significant (p&amp;lt;0.001) predictors of incident HFmrEF were systolic dysfunction (S'≤6.0 cm/s), hazard ratio (HR) 2.2, 95% CI 1.82–2.9) and reduced GLS (HR 3.5, 95% CI 3.1–3.9), all p&amp;lt;0.01. The strongest (p&amp;lt;0.001) predictors of incident HFpEF were new-onset atrial fibrillation (HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.9–3.9) and echo-detected left ventricular hypertrophy (septal and posterior wall thickness ≥13 mm, HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.22–1.89), all p&amp;lt;0.01. Conclusions For preventing HF progression is required additional research focused on cooperative care between GP and specialised HF outpatient clinic. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Supported by grant from the Slovak Society of Cardiology 2015 Selective screening of heart failure stages in regional settings

Economic evaluation of a medical ambulatory care service using a single group interrupted time-series design.

Increasing demand for hospital services can lead to overcrowding and delays in treatment, poorer outcomes and a high cost-burden. The medical ambulatory care service (MACS) provides out of hospital patient care, including diagnostic and therapeutic interventions for patients that require urgent attention, but which can be safely administered in the ambulatory environment. The programme is yet to be rigorously evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the MACS programme on emergency department(ED) presentations, hospital admissions, length-of-stay and health service costs from a health system perspective. We used a single group interrupted time series methodology with a multiple baseline approach to analyse the impact of the MACS clinic on ED presentations, hospital admissions, length-of-stay and cost outcomes for general practitioners(GP)-referred, ED-referred and ward-referred patients under two counterfactual scenarios: an increasing trend in health utilization based on preperiod predictions or a stabilization of utilization rates. The time trend of hospital utilization differed after attending MACS for all three referral groups. The time trend for the GP-referred group declined significantly by 0.36 ED presentations per 100 patients per 30 days [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.52 to-0.2], while inpatient length of stay declined significantly by 1.56and 3.70 days, respectively, per 100 ED-referred and ward-referred patients per 30 days (95% CI: -2.51 to-0.57 and -5.71 to-1.69,respectively). Under two different counterfactual scenarios, the predicted net savings for MACS across three patient groups were $78,685 (95% CI: $54,807-$102,563) and $547,639 (95% CI: $503,990-$591,287) per 100 patients over 18 months. MACS was found to be cost-effective for GP and ward-referred groups, but the expected impact for ED-referred patients is sensitive to assumptions. Expansion of the service for GP-referred patients is expected to reduce hospitalizations the most and generate the largest net cost savings.

The impact of clinical experience on working tasks and job-related stress: a survey among 1032 Norwegian GPs

BackgroundGeneral practice is a generalist discipline fraught with complexity. For inexperienced physicians, it may be demanding to get to grips with the clinical challenges. The purpose of this article is to describe possible differences in the range of tasks between inexperienced and experienced general practitioners (GPs), and the extent to which clinical experience affects the way in which GPs perceive their daily work.MethodsAn online questionnaire was sent to all regular GPs in Norway (N = 4784) in 2018. The study sought to document the tasks performed during a typical working day and how the GPs perceived their working situation. In this study, we compare the tasks, working situation and occurrence of potentially conflictual consultations among ‘less experienced physicians’ (≤ 5 years of experience in general practice) versus ‘more experienced physicians’ (> 5 years of experience). The findings are discussed in light of theories on development of expertise.ResultsWe received responses from 1032 GPs; 296 (29%) were less experienced and 735 (71%) more experienced. The two groups reported virtually the same number of consultations (19.2 vs. 20.5) and clinical problems handled (40.4 vs. 44.2) during the study day. The less experienced physicians reported a higher proportion of challenging and/or conflictual consultations, involving prescriptions for potentially addictive medication (5.7% vs. 3.1%), sickness certification (4.1% vs. 2.4%) and referral for medical investigations on weak clinical indication (8.1% vs. 5.6%). For other clinical issues there were minor or no differences. Both GP groups reported high levels of work-related stress with negative effect on self-perceived health (61.6% vs 64.6%). GPs who felt that high job demands harmed their health tended to handle a slightly higher number of medical issues per consultation and more consultations with elements of conflict.Conclusions and implicationsInexperienced GPs in Norway handle a workload comparable to that of experienced GPs, but they perceive more conflictual consultations. These findings have relevance for training and guidance of future GP specialists. Irrespective of experience, the GPs report such high levels of negative work-related stress as to indicate an acute need for organisational changes that imply a reduced workload.