General Practitioner Contract Research Articles

Teeth for life? Some hope...

The consequences of the 2006 contract for general dental practitioners have been frequently discussed. Recent government tinkering with it has made little difference and access to NHS dentistry is now difficult, if not impossible, in some parts of the country. The promises of the 1950s and 1960s that teeth could be saved and kept for life have been broken by the concept of 'units of dental activity.' Older generations in particular have been let down badly by their introduction.

The digitized chronic disease management model: scalable strategies for implementing standardized healthcare and big data analytics in Shanghai.

Chronic disease management (CDM) falls under production relations, and digital technology belongs to the realm of productivity. Production relations must adapt to the development of productivity. Simultaneously, the prevalence and burden of chronic diseases are becoming increasingly severe, leveraging digital technology to innovate chronic disease management model is essential. The model was built to cover experts in a number of fields, including administrative officials, public health experts, information technology staff, clinical experts, general practitioners, nurses, metrologists. Integration of multiple big data platforms such as General Practitioner Contract Platform, Integrated Community Multimorbidity Management System and Municipal and District-Level Health Information Comprehensive Platform. This study fully analyzes the organizational structure, participants, service objects, facilities and equipment, digital technology, operation process, etc., required for new model in the era of big data. Based on information technology, we build Integrated Community Multimorbidity Care Model (ICMCM). This model is based on big data, is driven by "technology + mechanism," and uses digital technology as a tool to achieve the integration of services, technology integration, and data integration, thereby providing patients with comprehensive people-centered services. In order to promote the implementation of the ICMCM, Shanghai has established an integrated chronic disease management information system, clarified the role of each module and institution, and achieved horizontal and vertical integration of data and services. Moreover, we adopt standardized service processes and accurate blood pressure and blood glucose measurement equipment to provide services for patients and upload data in real time. On the basis of Integrated Community Multimorbidity Care Model, a platform and index system have been established, and the platform's multidimensional cross-evaluation and indicators are used for management and visual display. The Integrated Community Multimorbidity Care Model guides chronic disease management in other countries and regions. We have utilized models to achieve a combination of services and management that provide a grip on chronic disease management.

'Frailty as an adjective rather than a diagnosis'-identification of frailty in primary care: a qualitative interview study.

In 2017, NHS England introduced proactive identification of frailty into the General Practitioners (GP) contract. There is currently little information as to how this policy has been operationalised by front-line clinicians, their working understanding of frailty and impact of recognition on patient care. We aimed to explore the conceptualisation and identification of frailty by multidisciplinary primary care clinicians in England. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with primary care staff across England including GPs, physician associates, nurse practitioners, paramedics and pharmacists. Thematic analysis was facilitated through NVivo (Version 12). Totally, 31 clinicians participated. Frailty was seen as difficult to define, with uncertainty about its value as a medical diagnosis. Clinicians conceptualised frailty differently, dependant on job-role, experience and training. Identification of frailty was most commonly informal and opportunistic, through pattern recognition of a frailty phenotype. Some practices had embedded population screening and structured reviews. Visual assessment and continuity of care were important factors in recognition. Most clinicians were familiar with the electronic frailty index, but described poor accuracy and uncertainty as to how to interpret and use this tool. There were different perspectives amongst professional groups as to whether frailty should be more routinely identified, with concerns of capacity and feasibility in the current climate of primary care workload. Concepts of frailty in primary care differ. Identification is predominantly ad hoc and opportunistic. A more cohesive approach to frailty, relevant to primary care, together with better diagnostic tools and resource allocation, may encourage wider recognition.

Patient Online Record Access in English Primary Care: Qualitative Survey Study of General Practitioners' Views.

In 2022, NHS England announced plans to ensure that all adult primary care patients in England would have full online access to new data added to their general practitioner (GP) record. However, this plan has not yet been fully implemented. Since April 2020, the GP contract in England has already committed to offering patients full online record access on a prospective basis and on request. However, there has been limited research into UK GPs' experiences and opinions about this practice innovation. This study aimed to explore the experiences and opinions of GPs in England about patients' access to their full web-based health record, including clinicians' free-text summaries of the consultation (so-called "open notes"). In March 2022, using a convenience sample, we administered a web-based mixed methods survey of 400 GPs in the United Kingdom to explore their experiences and opinions about the impact on patients and GPs' practices to offer patients full online access to their health records. Participants were recruited using the clinician marketing service Doctors.net.uk from registered GPs currently working in England. We conducted a qualitative descriptive analysis of written responses ("comments") to 4 open-ended questions embedded in a web-based questionnaire. Of 400 GPs, 224 (56%) left comments that were classified into 4 major themes: increased strain on GP practices, the potential to harm patients, changes to documentation, and legal concerns. GPs believed that patient access would lead to extra work for them, reduced efficiency, and increased burnout. The participants also believed that access would increase patient anxiety and incur risks to patient safety. Experienced and perceived documentation changes included reduced candor and changes to record functionality. Anticipated legal concerns encompassed fears about increased litigation risks and lack of legal guidance to GPs about how to manage documentation that would be read by patients and potential third parties. This study provides timely information on the views of GPs in England regarding patient access to their web-based health records. Overwhelmingly, GPs were skeptical about the benefits of access both for patients and to their practices. These views are similar to those expressed by clinicians in other countries, including Nordic countries and the United States before patient access. The survey was limited by the convenience sample, and it is not possible to infer that our sample was representative of the opinions of GPs in England. More extensive, qualitative research is required to understand the perspectives of patients in England after experiencing access to their web-based records. Finally, further research is needed to explore objective measures of the impact of patient access to their records on health outcomes, clinician workload, and changes to documentation.

1363 ‘FRAILTY AS AN ADJECTIVE RATHER THAN A DIAGNOSIS’ - THE IDENTIFICATION OF FRAILTY IN PRIMARY CARE: A QUALITATIVE INTERVIEW STUDY

Abstract Introduction In 2017 NHS England introduced proactive identification of frailty into the General Practitioners (GPs) Contract. There is currently little information as to how this policy has been operationalised by front-line clinicians, their working understanding of frailty, or perceptions of impact on patient care. Evidence from international settings suggests primary care clinicians may have mixed interpretations of frailty, with important implications for their willingness to support different frailty interventions. We aimed to explore the conceptualisation of frailty, and how community-dwelling frail older adults are identified in primary care. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with primary care staff across England, including GPs, physician associates, nurse practitioners, paramedics and pharmacists. Thematic analysis was facilitated through NVivo (Version 13). Results 31 practitioners participated (12 GPs, 19 non-GPs). Frailty was seen as difficult to define, with uncertainty in its value as a medical diagnosis. The most common working model was the frailty phenotype, associated with deterioration at end of life. There was a mixture of formal and informal processes for identifying frailty. A few practices had embedded population screening and structured reviews. Informal processes included use of ‘housebound’ as a proxy for frailty, identification through chronic disease and medication reviews, and holistic assessment through good continuity of care. Many clinicians described poor accuracy of the electronic Frailty Index, yet it was commonly used to grade frailty during protocolised chronic disease reviews. The Clinical Frailty Score, in contrast, was felt to be easy to use and interpret, but inconsistently recorded within electronic health records. Most clinicians favoured better tools for identifying frailty, alongside resources to support these individuals. Conclusions Concepts of frailty in primary care differ. Identification is predominantly ad-hoc, opportunistic and associated with terminal illness. A more cohesive approach to frailty, relevant to primary care, together with better diagnostic tools, may encourage wider recognition.

General practitioner-centered care: a model with potential for improvement?

General practitioner (GP)-centered care was introduced into outpatient care on the basis of the GKV Modernisation Acts (GKV, gesetzliche Krankenversicherung: German statutory health insurance) of 2004 and 2007. These are predominantly selective contracts according to §73b of the German Social Code (Sozialgesetzbuch, SGB) V, which are signed between management companies such as the German GP Contract Association (Hausärztliche Vertragsgemeinschaft, HÄVG ) and the health insurance funds. The latter are obliged to enter into contracts, while participation by contracted physicians and patients is voluntary. The contract landscape of the AOK and the MEDI association in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, is considered a lighthouse project nationwide: here, approximately 5,300 general practitioners and 3,000 specialists participate in general practitioner (GP)-centered care, and about 1.7 million patients are enrolled. In addition to the higher remuneration for medical services, advantages include better control and continuity of care, the avoidance of misallocations, and the strengthening of the GP as a health guide. The increased administrative burden for participating practices and, on closer analysis, the predominantly economic focus of the contract contents, as well as the fact that they are exclusive to general practices, have proven to be disadvantages. Doing business on the basis of selective contracts leads to a division of the entire medical profession, and medical freelancing is at stake. In order to strengthen primary care in the long term, the collective-contract situation must be expanded and improved through special add-on contracts. At the same time, the risk of morbidity must not be unilaterally passed on to the medical profession through budgeting. A forward-thinking and transparently designed primary care can only be ensured with the full participation of internists in close cooperation with specialists.

73 THE NEW CHRONIC DISEASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME FOR GENERAL PRACTITIONERS: MAKING THE CASE FOR ITS REVISION TO INCLUDE DEMENTIA

Abstract Background A significant component of the new contract for general practitioners is the chronic disease management programme (CDMP for GPs). Although dementia can be framed as a chronic disease, it was not included in this programme. Its exclusion raises a number of questions including: Should dementia be framed as a chronic disease? Is it feasible to include dementia in a future revised CDMP for GPs? What are the likely benefits and potential risks? Methods This presentation focuses on two elements of a larger mixed-methods study, namely: (i) in-depth analysis of the CDMP for GPs, involving a review of the programme’s three main components to test the feasibility of extending it to incorporate dementia; and (ii) qualitative content analysis of data from semi-structured interviews with 12 stakeholders whose expertise is in dementia, chronic disease or both. Both elements were informed by a literature review. Results No consensus was found about whether dementia should be framed as a chronic disease. Results showed that it is feasible to extend the annual preventative programme of the CDMP for GPs to include additional modifiable dementia risk factors. While opportunistic case finding for identifying undiagnosed dementia cannot be recommended, a tool is available that would enable GPs identify people with dementia for enrolment on the structured treatment programme. Expected benefits from including dementia in the CDMP for GPs include integrated care pathways, better GP access and record-keeping and greater emphasis on primary and secondary prevention. Expected risks include excessive costs, caregiver burden, increased GP workload and sub-optimal care due to lack of specialist dementia training. Conclusion There is a compelling case to support dementia risk reduction in the CDMP for GPs. However, the programme’s current emphasis on self-management and rigidly planned visits could prove problematic for people with dementia and would need substantial revision.

Working lives of GPs in Scotland and England: cross-sectional analysis of national surveys

ObjectivesThe UK faces major problems in retaining general practitioners (GPs). Scotland introduced a new GP contract in April 2018, intended to better support GPs. This study compares the career intentions...

96 Will Routine Frailty Identification by GPS Improve Patient Care? A Review of the 2017 GMS Contract For General Practitioners (GPS) Using Pestle Analysis Tool

Abstract Introduction It is well established in the literature that frailty is associated with high health costs (Bock 2016, England: BioMed Central). Early identification improves patient outcomes. The 2017 GMS contract for General Practioners’ (NHS England 2017) had tried to implement this. This is a result from the government wanting to improve care for frail patients from the “Five Year Forward Review”. This is first policy worldwide to introduce a policy on frailty screening (Reeves, 2018, BMJ, 362, pp. k3349). Majority of frail patients’ first contact with the NHS is through Primary Care. However, with ever reducing number of GPs and increasing work burden, is it appropriate to ask GPs to undertake this? Methods This review uses the policy analysis tool PESTLE (Political, Economical, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental) (Visconti 2016, Corporate Ownership and Control,13), to assess the implications of this new contract obligation on GPs and patients. Results Once frail patients are identified, it is advised that they are reviewed by GPs annually. Whether this actually benefits patients are not clear (Page 2017 British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 82(3), pp. 583–623). The evidence for interventions being cost-effective is also inconsistent (Hamilton 2017, BMJ, 358, pp. j4478). Alternative methods include implementing a nurse-led community frailty service, has shown some benefit in Netherlands (Bleijenberg 2017, JAMDA). Clinical Pharmacist can aid with medication reviews and focusing on Geriatrician “outreach” clinics in primary care can improve patient care and outcomes (Goldstein 2014, CJEM, 16(5), pp. 370). Due to the work burden, GPs are often seen to be reactive rather than proactive (Goodwin 2010, The King’s Fund). The shift in focus on frailty can simulate more constructive dialogue between primary care, secondary care, patients and their carers. The BMA has also tried to reassure GPs this is not an added burden, but this is controversial (BMA 2017). Conclusions To successfully implement such a policy, emphasis on clear objective outcomes and strategy is needed. There is a risk of frailty identification becoming a tick box exercise.

Satisfaction with service coverage and drug list may influence patients\u2019 acceptance of general practitioner contract service: a cross-sectional study in Guangdong, China

BackgroundGeneral practitioner (GP) system is proved to be effective in over 50 countries worldwide. Guangdong province, as a reform pilot in China, initiated its patient-GP contract service reform in 2014. This study is designed to assess the patients’ acceptance of General Practitioners Contract (GPC) reform and explore its influencing factors.MethodsThis survey interviewed 1010 participants from 16 primary health centers (PHCs) chosen from 4 pilot cities in Guangdong during July and December in 2015. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews. The questionnaire was developed to discover the acceptance of GPC and covered three parts: respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics, health service utilization, and the patients’ assessment of primary health care centers. A binary logistic regression model was used to measure the influencing factors of respondents’ acceptance of GPC policy.ResultsA total of 611(60.5%) participants accepted GPC policy. Compared to patients visited PHCs over 7 times in the previous year, those visited PHCs fewer times reported lower acceptance of GPC policy (OR:0.68, 95% CI:0.49–0.96 for visits ≤3 times and OR:0.57, 95% CI:0.38–0.84 for visits = 4–6 times). Patients’ satisfaction with medical service coverage was positively associated with patients’ acceptance of GPC (OR: 1.72, 95% CI:1.01–3.98 for the satisfied versus the dissatisfied; OR: 1.38, 95% CI:0.92–3.30 for neutral versus the dissatisfied), and the satisfaction with drug list also positively influenced patients’ acceptance of GPC policy (OR: 1.44, 95% CI:1.26–2.73 for the satisfied versus the dissatisfied; OR:1.61, 95% CI:1.36–2.99 for neutral versus the dissatisfied). Meanwhile, age and education had positive impacts on the acceptance of the GPC policy.ConclusionThis study finds out that patients’ satisfaction with medical service coverage and drug list are the influencing factors for the acceptance of GPC policy. Therefore, improvement of medical service accessibility such as better follow-up of patients with chronic diseases and enhanced referral service, as well as the expansion of drug list, will improve patients’ acceptance of GPC policy. It also finds that patients using more primary health service are inclined to accept GPC policy, so more attractive and high-quality service should be provided in PHCs.

The barriers and facilitators to the implementation of National Clinical Programmes in Ireland: using the MRC framework for process evaluations

BackgroundA major healthcare reform agenda in Ireland is underway which underpins the establishment of a series of National Clinical Programmes (NCPs), which aim to take an evidence based approach to improve quality, access and value. The current study aimed to determine the enablers and barriers to implementation of the NCPs.MethodsA qualitative methodology advocated by the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework on conducting process evaluations of complex interventions guided this research. Purposive sampling techniques were used to recruit participants from seven NCPs across both acute and chronic healthcare domains, comprised of orthopaedics, rheumatology, elective surgery, emergency medicine, paediatrics, diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A total of 33 participants were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Participants included current and previous Clinical Leads, Programme Managers, Health Service Executive management, hospital Chief Executive Officers, representatives of General Practice, and a Nursing and a Patient representative. Thematic analyses was conducted.ResultsA range of factors of different combinations and co-occurrence were highlighted across a total of six themes, including (i) positive leadership, governance and clinical networks of the NCPs, (ii) the political and social context in which the NCPs operate, (iii) constraints on resources, (iv) a passive attitudinal resistance to change borne from poor consultation and communication, (v) lack of data and information technology, (vi) forces outside of the NCPs such as the general practitioner contract thwarting change of the model of care.ConclusionsThe MRC framework proved a useful tool to conduct this process evaluation. Results from this research provide real world experiences and insight from the people charged with implementing large-scale health system improvement initiatives. The findings highlight the need for measured responses that acknowledge both direct and non-direct challenges and opportunities for successful change. Combined, it is recommended that these elements be considered in the planning and implementation of large-scale initiatives across healthcare delivery systems, both in Ireland and internationally.

Demand and Signing of General Practitioner Contract Service among the Urban Elderly: A Population-Based Analysis in Zhejiang Province, China.

This study aims to examine whether the urban elderly in the Zhejiang Province of China signed contracts with their general practitioner (GP) based on their health service needs, and to further identify the determinants of their demand and signing decisions. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in 16 community health service (CHS) institutions in Zhejiang Province, China. The urban elderly over 60 years of age were enrolled when visiting the sampled CHS. Baseline characteristics were compared between participants using Chi-Square tests for categorical variables. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify determinants of the GP contract service demand and signing decisions, respectively. Among the 1440 urban elderly, 56.67% had signed contracts with their GP, and 55.35% had a demand of the GP contract service. The influencing factors of demand were a history of diabetes or cardiovascular disease (OR = 1.33, 95% CI, 1.05–1.68); urban resident basic medical insurance (URBMI) vs. urban employee basic medical insurance (UEBMI) (OR = 1.96, 95% CI, 1.46–2.61); and middle-income vs. low-income (OR = 0.67, 95% CI, 0.50–0.90 for RMB 1001–3000; OR = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.39–0.90 for RMB 3001–5000). Having a demand for the GP contract service was the strongest determinant of signing decisions (OR = 13.20, 95% CI, 10.09–17.27). Other factors also contributed to these decisions, including gender, caregiver, and income. The urban elderly who had signed contracts with GPs were mainly based on their health care needs. Elderly people with a history of diabetes or cardiovascular disease, as well as those with URBMI, were found to have stronger needs of a GP contract service. It is believed that the high-income elderly should be given equal priority to those of low-income.

An Assessment of Private General Practitioners Contracting for Public Health Services Delivery in O.R. Tambo District, South Africa.

Low- and middle-income countries are striving towards universal health coverage in a variety of ways. Achieving this goal requires the participation of both public and the private sector providers. The study sought to assess existing capacity for independent general practitioner contracting in primary care, the reasons for the low uptake of government national contract and the expectations of general practitioners of such contractual arrangements. This was a case study conducted in a rural district of South Africa. The study employed both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. Data were collected using a general practitioner and practice profiling tool, and a structured questionnaire. A total of 42 general practitioners were interviewed and their practices profiled. Contrary to observed low uptake of the national general practitioner contract, 90% of private doctors who had not yet subscribed to it were actually interested in it. Substantial evidence indicated that private doctors had the capacity to deliver quality care to public patients. However, low uptake of national contarct related mostly to lack of effective communication and consultation between them and national government which created mistrust and apprehension amongst local private doctors. Paradoxically, these general practitioners expressed satisfaction with other existing state contracts. An analysis of the national contract showed that there were likely to benefit more from it given the relatively higher payment rates and the guaranteed nature of this income. Proposed key requisites to enhanced uptake of the national contract related to the type of the contract, payment arrangements and flexibility of the work regime, and prospects for continuous training and clinical improvements. Low uptake of the national General Practitioner contract was due to variety of factors related to lack of understanding of contract details. Such misunderstandings between potential contracting parties created mistrust and apprehension, which are fundamental antitheses of any effective contractual arrangement. The idea of a one-size-fits-all contract was probably inappropriate.

General practitioners' altered preferences for private practice vs. salaried positions: a consequence of proposed policy regulations?

BackgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) in most high-income countries have a history of being independent private providers with much autonomy. While GPs remain private providers, their autonomous position appears to be challenged by increased policy regulations. This paper examines the extent to which GPs’ preferences for private practice vs. salaried contracts changed in a period where a new health care reform, involving proposed increased regulations of the GPs, was introduced.MethodsWe use data collected from Norwegian GPs through structured online questionnaires in December 2009 and May 2012.ResultsWe find that the proportion of GPs who prefer private practice (i.e. the default contract for GPs in Norway) decreases from 52% to 36% in the period from 2009 to 2012. While 67% of the GPs who worked in private practice preferred this type of contract in 2009, the proportion had dropped by 20 percentage points in 2012. Salaried contracts are preferred by GPs who are young, work in a small municipality, have more patients listed than they prefer, work more hours per week than they prefer, have relatively low income or few patients listed.ConclusionWe find that GPs’ preferences for private practice vs. salaried positions have changed substantially in the last few years, with a significant shift towards salaried contracts. With the proportions of GPs remaining fairly similar across private practice and salaried positions, there is an increasing discrepancy between GPs’ current contract and their preferred one.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0777-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Have the New GP Contract and NICE guidelines improved the clinical care of people with epilepsy?

PurposeThis retrospective audit was to assess the effect of the New General Practitioner (GP) Contract and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on the care and management of people with epilepsy (PWE) during the period of observation from April 2004 to April 2009. MethodThe case notes of 540 people on anti-epilepsy drugs (AEDs) aged 16 years were reviewed in 13 general practices serving Ellesmere Port and Neston. ResultsForty-nine percent of people with poorly controlled epilepsy were not under shared care. Diagnostic doubt existed in 25 (5%) people. There was no evidence that the original diagnosis had been actively reviewed by the GP in any case. There were 98 (18%) women of childbearing age, in 21 of whom there was no evidence of pre-conceptual counselling ever having taken place, and 61 (62%) were not receiving folic acid routinely. Thirty-nine (7%) people were demonstrably non-compliant, whilst 74 (14%) people had prescription anomalies consisting mainly of inappropriate multi-dose regimens. ConclusionDespite marked improvements in review rates after the introduction of the New GP Contract five years previously, there are still significant unmet needs in this patient group. Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) should consider funding an intermediate tier of care incorporating GPs with a special interest in epilepsy (GPwSIes) and Epilepsy Nurse Specialists (ENS) for PWE to improve and maintain existing and future primary care, as epilepsy is phased out of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF).

Going beyond the numbers - a call to redefine polypharmacy.

Going beyond the numbers - a call to redefine polypharmacy.

International emergency medicine: Past and future

Much has been written about the development of emergency medicine (EM) and its impact on the medical system as a whole. It is still described as ‘new’ and very much seen as a specialty that is evolving, rather than a static domain of knowledge and skills with rigid boundaries. In reality, the fundamentals of emergency treatment in mitigating the effects of acute illness and injury go back to ancient times. This is evidenced by descriptions of the urgent management of acute pain with analgesics, splinting of injured limbs, and more sophisticated procedures, such as the removal of kidney stones and craniotomies. The treatments at that time were limited, but the application of these skills brought relief to many people (and a little pain). The practitioners were generalists and did not limit themselves to emergency treatment alone. Over the past half-century, there has been an acceleration of development in emergency medical treatments and a massive explosion in emergency medical system enhancement. This has resulted in a unique body of knowledge and skills, with the evolution of a new medical specialty specific to the delivery of emergency medical care. It is worth reflecting on the drivers for EM specialisation, where the specialty has come from, and what we can expect as the complexity of medical care increases with technological innovation and social changes associated with increasing connectivity.

Have contractual changes in primary care affected unplanned short stay childhood admissions in England? National time trends study 2001–11

BackgroundShort-stay unplanned hospital admissions in children have much increased over the past decade everywhere. Timely primary care prevents unplanned admissions into hospital and short stays admissions can be regarded as a proxy indicator of conditions that could be dealt with in primary care. In April, 2004, major changes in primary care occurred across England, with the introduction of the new general practitioner (GP) contract. Out-of-hours health provision ceased to be the responsibility of GPs, and alternative services introduced to compensate were unpopular with patients. In-hours health-care provision also altered; the introduction of financial incentives for chronic disease management, having been aimed at adults, altered the availability of GP appointments for children. Reduced access to primary care in and out of hours could have delayed health seeking and potentially driven parents to use emergency care. We investigated the effect of these changes on children. MethodsWe applied a segmented population-based time trends study design, using Hospital Episode Statistics data, in children aged 0–14 years who were admitted in England between April 1, 2001, and March 31, 2004, and between April 1, 2004, and March 31, 2011. The outcome measures were age-specific unplanned admission rates for total and very short stays (same day discharge). The unit of analysis was middle super output area and we applied a generalised estimating equations model, adjusting for deprivation and autocorrelation. Indicator variables modelled a step change at and a trend change after service changes in April, 2004. Interaction coefficients estimated the effect modification of age on the baseline trend and point of intervention. FindingsAge-standardised rates increased by 15% between 2001–02 and 2010–11, from 64·7 (95% CI 64·6–64·9) to 74·3 (74·2–74·5) unplanned admissions per 1000 children. Segmented trends analysis showed a 1% step change (rate ratio [RR] 1·01, 95% CI 1·01–1·02) in the adjusted rate of all-cause unplanned admissions after the introduction of GP service changes in April, 2004, above the baseline trend of a 1% yearly increase in previous years (1·01, 1·01–1·01). The steepest age-specific baseline trends were in children aged less than 1 year, decreasing across older age bands (2% yearly increase in children under 1 year vs 1% in those aged 1–4 years). The largest step change in unplanned admission rates in 2004 was 5% in children aged 10–14 years (RR 1·05, 95% CI 1·04–1·07). Increases have been driven by very short stay rates, a yearly increase of 5% (1·05, 1·05–1·06) and a 4% step change (1·04, 1·03–1·05) in children aged under 15 years. The effect in 2004 ranged from no effect in children under 1 year (1·00, 0·99–1·01) to a 7% step change in children aged 5–9 years (1·07, 1·05–1·09). InterpretationWe noted a 5% increase in the rate of children admitted and discharged on the same day, coinciding with major reorganisation in primary care in 2004. The increase has not been uniform across age groups in children. Alternative explanations for the large increases in 2004 include the introduction of a 4-h waiting target in English emergency departments; changes in population demographics with European Union expansion; and the introduction of payment by results in English hospitals. There are limitations to routine hospital activity data and the observational study design allows only description of associations between exposure and outcome. However, Hospital Episode Statistics has been shown to be a useful method for exploring the effect of national policy change. FundingThis study is part of a National Institute for Health Research research project.

Improving lipid profiles and increasing use of lipid-lowering therapy in England: results from a national cross-sectional survey - 2006

To evaluate blood lipid levels in the adult English population in 2006 and to report change in the use and efficacy of lipid-lowering treatment since 2003 after which time the general practitioner contract introduced a 'pay-per-performance' approach. Cross-sectional surveys. Nationally representative sample of 14,142 noninstitutionalized adults (>16 years) living in England, partaking in the Health Survey for England 2006. Mean levels of total, HDL, non-HDL and total/HDL cholesterol ratio, prevalence of hypercholesterolaemia, use of lipid lowering agents and lipid levels and control rates among those on treatment. Age-standardized mean cholesterol levels fell from 5·49 mM in men and 5·56 mM in women in 2003 to 5·26 and 5·37 mM, respectively, in 2006. In 2006, 59% of adults had a total cholesterol ≥ 5·0 mM and 11% reported lipid-lowering treatment, of whom 66% had a total cholesterol < 5·0 mM and 22% were < 4·0 mM. The majority of those with established coronary heart disease, stroke or diabetes but fewer than one quarter of those with hypertension or ≥ 20% estimated 10-year cardiovascular risk and no established CVD took lipid-lowering drugs. Lipid lowering treatment rates increased fivefold and control rates among the treated (to < 5·0 mM) more than doubled between 1998 and 2006. About one-third of those with established CVD or diabetes had cholesterol levels of < 4·0 mM. Previously reported improvements in treatment and control rates between 1998 and 2003 continued between 2003 and 2006, with the biggest increases among those with established CVD and diabetes.

Social deprivation and prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the UK: workload implications for primary care

The 'inverse care law' suggests that populations with the poorest health outcomes also tend to have poorer access to high-quality care. The new general practitioner (GP) contract in the UK aimed to reduce variations in care between areas by collecting information on processes and outcomes of chronic disease management. This study investigated whether, despite reductions in inequalities, primary care in deprived areas is still at a disadvantage due to the higher prevalence of chronic diseases, using chronic kidney disease (CKD) as an example. Initially, data from a hospital-based cohort of CKD patients were analysed to investigate the clustering of CKD patients across area-level deprivation using a geographical information system that employed kernel density estimation. Data from the Quality and Outcomes Framework were then analysed to explore the burden of CKD and associated non-communicable chronic diseases (NCD) and assess the potential impact on GPs' workload by area-level deprivation. There was a significant clustering of CKD patients referred to the hospital in the most deprived areas. Both the prevalence of CKD and associated conditions and caseload per GP were significantly higher in deprived areas. In the most deprived areas, there is an increased burden of major chronic disease and a higher caseload for clinicians. These reflect significant differences in workload for practices in deprived areas, which needs to be addressed.