General Practice Setting Research Articles

Patient Safety and Medical Error Prevention in General Practice: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Patient safety and medical error prevention remain critical issues in general practice, where medical errors can lead to adverse patient outcomes and increased healthcare costs. This systematic review synthesizes recent evidence on prevalent types of medical errors, effective prevention strategies, and outcomes of patient safety interventions within general practice settings. Following a comprehensive search across multiple databases, 52 studies published from 2014 to 2024 were included. Findings highlight medication errors, diagnostic inaccuracies, and communication lapses as the most common types of errors. Effective prevention strategies include the adoption of electronic health records (EHR), structured team communication protocols, checklist systems, and staff training programs on safety practices. These interventions have shown significant reductions in error rates and improvements in patient outcomes, though implementation is often hindered by barriers such as limited resources, resistance to change, and lack of training. This review underscores the importance of a multifaceted approach that combines technological, organizational, and educational interventions to enhance patient safety in general practice. Future research should explore long-term impacts of these interventions and address context-specific challenges to foster a culture of safety in healthcare settings.

Associations between general practice and outpatient care continuity in people with multimorbidity

Abstract Background Relational continuity in primary and secondary care is linked to better health outcomes for patients, but it is unclear whether metrics of continuity in each setting are associated. Our study examined the association between relational continuity in general practice (GP) and continuity of hospital outpatient specialties in people with clusters of multimorbidity. Methods We used GP records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, linked to Hospital Episode Statistics outpatient records. Included were patients ≥18 years, with two or more of 212 Long-Term Conditions (LTCs), registered throughout 2019 and with at least three GP and three outpatient appointments. The Continuity of Care Index (COCI) was calculated separately for visits to the same i) GP and ii) hospital specialty, where 0 represents no continuity and 1 represents all visits to the same GP or specialty. We assessed the association between the indices using univariable and multivariable fractional logit regression. We calculated expected COCI scores for each LTC and assessed variation in the COCI between LTCs assigned to one of 15 clusters of co-occurring diseases derived previously. A sensitivity analysis repeated analysis using the Sequential Continuity (SECON) score, which captures longitudinal continuity. Results Of 1,135,903 patients, 56.2% were ≥60 years. The median (IQR) COCI in GP was 0.22 (0.11-0.40) and in outpatients was 0.33 (0.20-0.52). Although statistically significant (p < 0.001) the relationship between the two measures was clinically insignificant in both univariable and multivariable models. No strong relationships were found between COCI scores and LTC clusters. Similar patterns were found using the SECON score. Conclusions We found no strong association between continuity of care in GP and outpatient settings, and no clear patterns with LTC clusters. This suggests that lack of continuity in secondary care is not compensated for by increased continuity of care in primary care. Key messages • We found no meaningful association between measures of continuity of care in general practice and hospital outpatient settings. • Our findings suggest that lack of continuity of outpatient care is not compensated for by increased continuity in primary care.

Advancing care in type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis: assessing pharmacist-led strategies in England's primary care - a retrospective observational study

Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes (T2D) mellitus is a complex multi-system disorder with a tendency to develop complications. ‘Persistence to therapy’ plans affect almost 50% of all people with T2D, leading to suboptimal glycaemic and cardiovascular (CVD) risk factor control. The interplay between T2D and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) underscores the need for a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to care that addresses both glycaemic control and CVD risk factors. Purpose This study retrospectively analysed pharmacist-led interventions in patients living with T2D and established ASCVD in general practices in a large UK city. Methods A retrospective pre-post observational study was conducted using electronic health record data from men and women diagnosed with T2D and ASCVD. Participants attended an independent prescribing pharmacist-led clinic within 21 general practices. The practices operated linked and comprehensive electronic health records systems, facilitating access to high-quality longitudinal data that align with study objectives. Results A total of 380 patients received pharmacist-led interventions. Comparisons of pre-intervention and post-intervention data revealed a significant decrease in HbA1c levels (73.7 ± 10.7 mmol/mol vs 67.2 ± 8.5 mmol/mol, p < 0.01), systolic blood pressure (132 ± 10.2 mmHg vs 125.9 ± 9.9 mmHg, p < 0.01), and diastolic blood pressure (76.8 ± 5.9 mmHg vs 72.4 ± 5.0 mmHg, p < 0.001). Additionally, total cholesterol levels significantly reduced from 4.4 ± 0.7 mmol/L to 3.9 ± 0.7 mmol/L (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients achieving the triple target of HbA1c (≤58 mmol/mol), BP (≤140/80 mmHg), and total cholesterol (≤5 mmol/L) increased significantly from 2.4% before the intervention to 23.4% afterward (p < 0.001). The initiation of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) therapies was the most common prescribing intervention (67%). Conclusions Pharmacist-led interventions in a general practice setting significantly improved several critical diabetes and CVD risk related outcomes. These findings underscore the potential benefits of integrating pharmacist-led care models into the management of T2D, particularly for patients with concurrent ASCVD and adopting an individualised, evidence-based approach to prescribing interventions.

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing in a general practice 2009-2019.

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is not recommended as a population screening measure for prostate cancer. PSA testing is nevertheless widespread and is associated with harm due to false-positive test results, overdiagnosis and economic costs. This study sought to document the exposure of patients to PSA testing over a decade in a general medical practice setting. Laboratory results for each year were extracted from the clinical record. A chart review was undertaken for cases of prostate cancer. We report 13,743 PSA results in 3313 men. In any year, 18% of all men and 33% of men aged over 50years had at least one PSA test. Between 4.8 and 21% of first tests exceeded age normal values depending on age. There were 113 incident cancers in the study interval of which 84 (74%) were screen detected. Mortality was lower in screen-detected than symptomatic cancers. Men at our practice are significantly exposed to PSA testing. We found evidence of possible overdiagnosis.

Provision of early clinical experience in UK medical schools: a cross-sectional survey

ABSTRACT Background There is an established evidence base to support early clinical experience (ECE) within medical degree programmes. However, increasingly crowded clinical learning environments can make provision challenging. The aim of this research was to develop understanding about how ECE is provided within UK medical schools. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study on ECE provision by UK medical schools using an electronic survey containing a mix of question styles. We gathered data on the stage at which ECE featured within curricula, the amount of ECE provided, the setting for ECE, the learning outcomes covered during ECE and whether such content was formally assessed. Support for survey dissemination was obtained from the UK Medical Schools Council (MSC) Education Leads Advisory Group (ELAG). Responses were collected between 10/05/23 and 11/10/23. Findings Of the 43 eligible UK medical schools, responses were received from 28 (65%). The provision of ECE amongst respondent medical schools was ubiquitous. The majority of ECE was provided within general practice and hospital settings, but community and voluntary sector settings were increasingly employed, as was technology enhanced ECE. A significant shift in the nature of the content addressed during ECE, with less focus on implementation of basic science was seen within learning outcomes. The extent to which ECE learning outcomes were formally assessed was variable. Conclusion The amount of ECE provided by UK medical schools has fallen. We encourage institutions to reflect on their provision of ECE and to consider how greater diversity of community settings and technology-enhanced learning could be harnessed.

Have interventions aimed at assisting general practitioners in facilitating earlier diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children been successful in preventing acute complications? A systematic review

BackgroundDiabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a life-threatening emergency that can result from delayed diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Three-quarters of Australian children with a new diagnosis of T1DM visit...

Developing a data-enabled nudge intervention for childhood antibiotics in primary care: a qualitative study.

Preschool children (aged≤5 years old) have the highest antibiotic prescribing rate in general practice, mostly for self-limiting acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Research from over 250 000 UK children suggests that a child's antibiotic history for RTI may be a good predictor for re-consulting a health professional for the same illness episode and increase clinical workload. To develop a data-enabled nudge intervention to optimise antibiotic prescribing for acute RTI based on a child's antibiotic history in general practice DESIGN & SETTING: Two phase qualitative study with parents/carers of preschool children and primary care clinicians METHOD: In phase 1, through an initial focus group with eight parents/carers and 'think aloud' interviews with 11 clinicians, we co-designed the intervention (computer screen prompt and personalised consultation leaflet). In phase 2, 13 clinicians used the intervention, integrated into the GP computer software, and share their feedback through 'think aloud' interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically. We co-created a data-driven intervention that automatically integrates a child's antibiotic history for acute RTI and personalised leaflet into the electronic medical records. We found that parents and clinicians found this intervention, in principle, acceptable and feasible to use in primary care consultations. Delivering such interventions, integrated into practice workflow, could be efficiently scaled up to promote effective antimicrobial stewardship and reduce unnecessary antibiotic use in primary care. Further research will test this intervention in a future trial.

Primary healthcare practitioners’ perspectives on trauma-informed primary care: a systematic review

BackgroundExposure to domestic and family violence is a pervasive form of complex trauma and a major global public health problem. At the frontline of the health system, primary healthcare practitioners are uniquely placed to support individuals with experiences of trauma, yet their views on trauma-informed primary care are not well understood. This systematic review of qualitative literature sought to explore primary healthcare practitioners’ perspectives on trauma-informed primary care.MethodsEight databases were searched up to July 2023. Studies were included if they consisted of empirical qualitative data, were conducted in general practice or equivalent generalist primary healthcare settings, and included the perspectives of primary healthcare practitioners where they could be distinguished from other participants in the analysis. Thematic synthesis was used for analysis.Results13 papers met inclusion criteria, representing primary care settings from the United States, Canada, Australia, and Norway. Three key themes were developed: Changing the paradigm, Building trust, and Navigating the emotional load. Findings shed light on how primary healthcare practitioners perceive and strive to practise trauma-informed primary healthcare and the challenges of navigating complex, trauma-related work in the primary care environment.ConclusionsThis review supports the need for recognition of the value of primary care in supporting patients with histories of trauma and violence, the development of interventions to mitigate the emotional load worn by primary healthcare practitioners, and further work to develop a deep and consistent understanding of what trauma-informed primary care encompasses.

General practitioners’ perspectives on data linkage in Australian general practice

ObjectiveIn the rapidly evolving landscape of digital health, data sharing using primary health care records has gained prominence. Linking primary care data with other administrative health datasets has the potential to provide a whole-of-life perspective on the patient journey and improve health outcomes. This study aimed to gain insight into Australian General Practitioners' (GPs) perspectives on the use of general practice health records for research and data linkage. ApproachThe study employed a mixed-methods approach. We conducted semi-structured interviews with GPs who had little experience of data sharing, focusing on understanding the challenges and opportunities that increased data sharing poses. We also conducted a three-round modified Delphi study with GPs with experience of and interest in research and data sharing to refine recommendations for data sharing using general practice data. ResultsIn this paper we describe the findings from both arms of the study and compare their recommendations to contribute to a nuanced understanding of general practitioners’ views on data linkage and sharing in general practice. Conclusions and ImplicationsBridging the knowledge gap between novices and expert practitioners, the findings will inform policies, practices, and initiatives to address the ethical, legal and social implications of data sharing in general practice settings in Australia.

Acute Myocarditis, the Dilemma in the General Practice Setting in the Years of the Coronavirus Pandemic Era: An Italian Experience

Myocarditis is inflammation of the muscle tissue of the heart (myocardium) and unlike most heart disease it tends to affect young people more often. Myocarditis can go almost unnoticed, frequently heals without results, but can sometimes be very serious and life threatening. However, many symptoms are non-specific and difficult to evaluate in the general practice setting. In order to diagnose myocarditis it is necessary to carry out some instrumental tests, too. Very important are the EKG and the dosage of cardiac markers in the blood. The echocardiogram allows you to highlight the valvular and muscle alterations that occur during inflammation and the same thing can be done by myocardial magnetic resonance. For those reasons, myocarditis is difficult to diagnose in the setting of General Practitioner (GP) and therefore it is underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed. The presence of nonspecific symptoms, fatigue and dyspnea, especially in a young person, it can lead the GP to suspect a myocarditis. We present a case of myocarditis in a young person. The patient, without a clinical history of important pathologies, presented asthenic and respiratory symptoms with progressive worsening of the clinical picture. We described the reasons of the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The general medicine setting is currently unsuitable for taking care of patients of this type, as the waiting times for the necessary examinations. The evaluation and follow-up are not within the reach of local doctors in Italy or with too long waiting times, so monitoring and optimizing therapies remain difficult outside the hospital.

Bias in obtaining broad consent in a German general practice? - Preliminary results from a cross-sectional study.

The growing importance of collecting Broad Consent (BC) for research utilizing electronic health records in Germany has brought attention to the need for a deeper understanding of potential selection bias in the process. Since 2020, the BeoNet-Halle outpatient database has been collecting anonymous and pseudonymous patient data from primary care and specialty practices throughout Germany, with the practice being an integral part of this data collection effort. The primary objective of the pilot study is to explore potential socioeconomic discrepancies between patients who provided BC and the general practice population. This is a single-center, cross-sectional study. The study was performed with patients from one Medical Care Center including eight GPs. We categorized patients with at least one interaction with a general practitioner from March 2021 to January 2023 into two sets: patients who approved BC versus a randomly chosen representative sample (RS) of non-BC inquirers. We mailed a sociodemographic survey to both groups. A total of 561 patients were analyzed, with the BC group responding more actively (60.7%) than the RS group (29.7%). Age and gender were similar between the BC group and RS group. Being widowed, divorced, or unmarried and being neither open nor hostile toward research was associated with an increased likelihood of giving consent. Analysis of personality traits did not show any impact on giving consent. Overall, this study outlines that there is some bias between BC and RS. Possible associations in BC decisions that offer insights into complex decisions to participate in medical research are marital status, immigrant background, income, and age. Findings emphasize the potential of BC for outpatient research, warranting further investigation to optimize its application in the general practice setting.

Implementation of decarbonisation actions in general practice: a systematic review and narrative synthesis protocol

IntroductionThere is growing recognition of the importance of primary care in addressing climate change. The World Organisation of Family Doctors has urged general practitioners worldwide to commit to tackling climate...

Time trends in the epidemiology of food allergy in England: an observational analysis of Clinical Practice Research Datalink data

Estimates for the prevalence of food allergy vary widely, with a paucity of data for adults. The aim of this analysis was to report trends in the incidence and prevalence of food allergy in England, using a national primary care dataset. We analysed data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1998 and 2018, with linked data to relevant hospital encounters in England. The main outcomes were incidence and prevalence of food allergy, according to three definitions of food allergy: possible food allergy, probable food allergy, and probable food allergy with adrenaline autoinjectors prescription. We also evaluated the difference in proportion of patients prescribed adrenaline autoinjectors by English Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), age, and by previous food anaphylaxis, and explored differences in patient encounters (general practice vs emergency department setting). 7 627 607 individuals in the dataset were eligible for inclusion, of whom 150 018 (median age 19 years [IQR 4-34]; 82 614 [55·1%] female and 67 404 [44·9%] male) had a possible food allergy. 121 706 met diagnostic criteria for probable food allergy, of whom 38 288 were prescribed adrenaline autoinjectors. Estimated incidence of probable food allergy doubled between 2008 and 2018, from 75·8 individuals per 100 000 person-years (95% CI 73·7-77·9) in 2008 to 159·5 (156·6-162·3) individuals per 100 000 person-years in 2018. Prevalence increased from 0·4% (23 399 of 6 432 383) to 1·1% (82 262 of 7 627 607) over the same period and was highest in children under 5 years (11 951 [4·0%] of 296 406 in 2018) with lower prevalence in school-aged children (from 11 353 [2·4%] of 473 597 in 2018 for children aged 5-9 years to 6896 [1·7%] of 404 525 for those aged 15-19 years) and adults (42 848 [0·7%] of 5 992 454 in 2018). In those with previous food anaphylaxis, only 2321 (58·3%) of 3980 (975 [64·0%] of 1524 children and young people and 1346 [54·8%] of 2456 adults) had a prescription for adrenaline autoinjector. Adrenaline autoinjectors prescription was less common in those resident in more deprived areas (according to IMD). In the analysis of health-care encounters, 488 604 (97·1%) of 503 198 visits recorded for food allergy occurred in primary care, with 115 655 (88·4%) of 130 832 patients managed exclusively in primary care. These estimates indicate an important and increasing burden of food allergy in England. Our findings that most patients with food allergy are managed outside the hospital system, with low rates of adrenaline autoinjector prescription in those with previous anaphylaxis, highlight a need to better support those working in primary care to ensure optimal management of patients with food allergy. UK Food Standards Agency and UK Medical Research Council.

Screening instruments for early identification of unmet palliative care needs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe early detection of individuals who require palliative care is essential for the timely initiation of palliative care services. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to (1) Identify the screening...

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Awareness in Primary Care: UK National Cross-Sectional Survey of General Practitioners.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a progressive neurological condition, characterized by spinal cord injury secondary to degenerative changes in the spine. Misdiagnosis in primary care forms part of a complex picture leading to an average diagnostic delay of 2 years. This leads to potentially preventable and permanent disability. A lack of awareness secondary to deficits in postgraduate education may contribute to these delays. This study aims to assess the awareness of DCM in the setting of general practice. General practitioners completed a quantitative web-based cross-sectional questionnaire. The 17-item questionnaire captured data regarding demographics, subjective awareness, and objective knowledge. The questionnaire was disseminated via professional networks, including via practice managers and senior practice partners. Incentivization was provided via a bespoke DCM fact sheet for those that completed the survey. A total of 54 general practitioners representing all 4 UK nations responded to the survey. General practitioners most commonly self-assessed that they had "limited awareness" of DCM (n=24, 51%). General practitioners felt most commonly "moderately able" to recognize a case of DCM (n=21, 46%). In total, 13% (n=6) of respondents reported that they would not be at all able to recognize a patient with DCM. Respondents most commonly reported that they were "moderately confident" in their ability to triage a patient with DCM (n=19, 41%). A quarter of respondents reported no prior introduction to DCM throughout their medical training (n=13, 25%). The mean score for knowledge-based questions was 42.6% (SD 3.96%) with the lowest performance observed in patient demographic and clinical recognition items. General practitioners lack confidence in the recognition and management of DCM. These findings are consistent with the diagnostic delays previously described in the literature at the primary care level. Further work to develop and implement educational interventions to general practitioner practices is a crucial step to improving patient outcomes in DCM.

Interventions targeting patients with co-occuring severe mental illness and substance use (dual diagnosis) in general practice settings – a scoping review of the literature

BackgroundPeople with dual diagnosis die prematurely compared to the general population, and general practice might serve as a setting in the healthcare system to mend this gap in health inequity. However, little is known about which interventions that have been tested in this setting.AimTo scope the literature on interventions targeting patients with dual diagnosis in a general practice setting, the outcomes used, and the findings.Design and settingA scoping review of patients with dual diagnosis in general practice.MethodsFrom a predeveloped search string, we used PubMed (Medline), PsychInfo, and Embase to identify scientific articles on interventions. Studies were excluded if they did not evaluate an intervention, if patients were under 18 years of age, and if not published in English. Duplicates were removed and all articles were initially screened by title and abstract and subsequent fulltext were read by two authors. Conflicts were discussed within the author group. A summative synthesis of the findings was performed to present the results.ResultsSeven articles were included in the analysis. Most studies investigated integrated care models between behavioural treatment and primary care, and a single study investigated the delivery of Cognitive Behavioral treatment (CBT). Outcomes were changes in mental illness scores and substance or alcohol use, treatment utilization, and implementation of the intervention in question. No studies revealed significant outcomes for patients with dual diagnosis.ConclusionFew intervention studies targeting patients with dual diagnosis exist in general practice. This calls for further investigation of the possibilities of implementing interventions targeting this patient group in general practice.

Development of a Video Consultation Patient-Satisfaction Questionnaire (vCare-PSQ): A Cross-Sectional Explorative Study.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of video consultation (VC) in primary care has expanded considerably in many countries. VC and other telehealth formats are often touted as a solution to improved health care access, with numerous studies showing high satisfaction with this care format among health professionals and patients. However, operationalization and measurement of patient satisfaction with VC varies across studies and often lacks consideration of dynamic contextual factors (eg, convenience, ease-of-use, or privacy) and doctor-patient relational variables that may influence patient satisfaction. We aim to develop a comprehensive and evidence-based questionnaire for assessing patient satisfaction with VC in general practice. The vCare Patient-Satisfaction Questionnaire (the vCare-PSQ) was developed according to the COSMIN (Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) guidelines. To achieve our overall objective, we pursued three aims: (1) a validation analysis of an existing patient-satisfaction scale (the PS-14), (2) an assessment of extrinsic contextual factors that may impact patient satisfaction, and (3) an assessment of pertinent intrinsic and relational satisfaction correlates (eg, health anxiety, information technology literacy, trust in the general practitioner, or convenience). For validation purposes, the questionnaire was filled out by a convenience sample of 188 Danish adults who had attended at least 1 VC. Our validation analysis of the PS-14 in a Danish population produced reliable results, indicating that the PS-14 is an appropriate measure of patient satisfaction with VC in Danish patient populations. Regressing situational and doctor-patient relational factors onto patient satisfaction further suggested that patient satisfaction is contingent on several factors not measured by the PS-14. These include information technology literacy and patient trust in the general practitioner, as well as several contextual pros and cons. Supplementing the PS-14 with dynamic measures of situational and doctor-patient relational factors may provide a more comprehensive understanding of patient satisfaction with VC. The vCare-PSQ may thus contribute to an enhanced methodological approach to assessing patient satisfaction with VC. We hope that the vCare-PSQ format may be useful for future research and implementation efforts regarding VC in a general practice setting.

Diagnostic accuracy of the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition case-finding instrument in a general practice setting and comparison with other widely used brief cognitive tests-a cross-validation study.

The aim of this study was to examine the discriminative validity of the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition (BASIC) case-finding instrument in a general practice (GP) setting and compare it with other widely used brief cognitive instruments. Patients aged ≥70 years were prospectively recruited from 14 Danish GP clinics. Participants were classified as having either normal cognition (n = 154) or cognitive impairment (n = 101) based on neuropsychological test performance, reported instrumental activities of daily living, and concern regarding memory decline. Comparisons involved the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS), the Mini-Cog, the 6-item Clock Drawing Test (CDT-6) and the BASIC Questionnaire (BASIC-Q). BASIC demonstrated good overall classification accuracy with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.92), a sensitivity of 0.72 (95% CI 0.62-0.80) and a specificity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.91). Pairwise comparisons of the AUCs of BASIC, MMSE, MoCA and RUDAS produced non-significant results, but BASIC had significantly higher classification accuracy than Mini-Cog, BASIC-Q and CDT-6. Depending on the pretest probability of cognitive impairment, the positive predictive validity of BASIC varied from 0.83 to 0.36, and the negative predictive validity from 0.97 to 0.76. BASIC demonstrated good discriminative validity in a GP setting. The classification accuracy of BASIC is equivalent to more complex, time-consuming instruments, such as the MMSE, MoCA and RUDAS, and higher than very brief instruments, such as the CDT-6, Mini-Cog and BASIC-Q.

Effectiveness of initiating advance care planning among older outpatients through intervention by physicians trained in a model discussion video: A randomized controlled trial.

This study aimed to assess the impact of a physician-led intervention on advance care planning (ACP) introduction among older outpatients using a model discussion video. This prospective interventional study included Japanese general practice outpatients aged ≥65 years. All participants received an ACP leaflet. Co-researchers were trained using a model discussion video based on the "Serious Illness Conversation Guide," and provided ACP introduction explanations to the intervention group to ensure intervention content consistency. The control group received the ACP leaflet only, with no standardized explanations. The primary outcome was ACP discussion occurrence. Secondary outcomes included ACP engagement (assessed through the 4-item ACP Engagement Survey), engagement score for advance directives acquisition and score for surrogate decision-maker identification, and anxiety incidence (assessed through Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7). This study included 48 participants: 25 (52.1%) in the intervention group and 23 (47.9%) in the control group. Regarding primary outcome, the intervention group had significantly more ACP discussions compared with the control group (92.0% vs 26.1%, adjusted odds ratio 50.2, P = 0.0012). Regarding secondary outcomes, the intervention group showed greater readiness (mean scores for the 4-item Engagement Survey [P = 0.0001], engagement score for advance directives acquisition [P = 0.01] and score for surrogate decision-maker determination [P = 0.03]) than the control group, without increasing anxiety. This physician-led ACP introduction for older patients in a Japanese general practice setting enhanced ACP readiness and stimulated discussions, without increasing anxiety. The model discussion video for ACP introduction might effectively train physicians in general practice settings. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••-••.

Diagnosing and managing prescription opioid use disorder in patients prescribed opioids for chronic pain in Australian general practice settings: a qualitative study using the theory of Planned Behaviour

BackgroundChronic pain is a debilitating and common health issue. General Practitioners (GPs) often prescribe opioids to treat chronic pain, despite limited evidence of benefit and increasing evidence of harms, including prescription Opioid Use Disorder (pOUD). Australian GPs are worried about the harms of long-term opioids, but few are involved in the treatment of pOUD. There is little research on GPs’ experiences diagnosing and managing pOUD in their chronic pain patients.MethodsThis qualitative research used semi-structured interviews and a case study to investigate GPs’ experiences through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). TPB describes three factors, an individual’s perceived beliefs/attitudes, perceived social norms and perceived behavioural controls. Participants were interviewed via an online video conferencing platform. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.ResultsTwenty-four GPs took part. Participants were aware of the complex presentations for chronic pain patients and concerned about long-term opioid use. Their approach was holistic, but they had limited understanding of pOUD diagnosis and suggested that pOUD had only one treatment: Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT). Participants felt uncomfortable prescribing opioids and were fearful of difficult, conflictual conversations with patients about the possibility of pOUD. This led to avoidance and negative attitudes towards diagnosing pOUD. There were few positive social norms, few colleagues diagnosed or managed pOUD. Participants reported that their colleagues only offered positive support as this would allow them to avoid managing pOUD themselves, while patients and other staff were often unsupportive. Negative behavioural controls were common with low levels of knowledge, skill, professional supports, inadequate time and remuneration described by many participants. They felt OAT was not core general practice and required specialist management. This dichotomous approach was reflected in their views that the health system only supported treatment for chronic pain or pOUD, not both conditions.ConclusionsNegative beliefs, negative social norms and negative behavioural controls decreased individual behavioural intention for this group of GPs. Diagnosing and managing pOUD in chronic pain patients prescribed opioids was perceived as difficult and unsupported. Interventions to change behaviour must address negative perceptions in order to lead to more positive intentions to engage in the management of pOUD.