Genetic studies of orthopaedic conditions, particularly those of childhood onset, enjoyed many successes in the early days of disease gene discovery. Some of the earliest high-profile discoveries centered on diseases with skeletal manifestations, such as neurofibromatosis1,2, achondroplasia3,4, and brachydactyly5-8. These successes were largely attributable to the availability of extended families with multiple affected members. Multigenerational families were informative in linkage mapping, also called inheritance mapping (Table I). Linkage mapping is an unbiased approach that seeks to identify genomic regions and genes that are inherited or “linked” among all affected members of the family. Linkage mapping proved particularly powerful for solving diseases that (1) have Mendelian inheritance, being caused by a single mutation in a family; (2) display high penetrance, such that essentially all family members with the mutation show the disease; and (3) are prevalent enough to permit the identification of several extended families. Linking a disease to a specific region of the genome was an important milestone for many early genetic studies, with such highlights as the mapping of the neurofibromatosis-1 gene (NF1) to chromosome 17q11.2 and the achondroplasia gene (FGFR3, which encodes fibroblast growth factor receptor 3) to 4p16.3. Once linkage mapping focused attention on a particular genomic region, the next major step in discovery was analysis of the region to identify the culprit gene harboring a disease-causing mutation. This process was labor and resource-intensive because linked regions were typically large and poorly annotated and encoded numerous genes9. A now classic, and celebrated, example of the immense effort required to find a disease mutation is the almost ten-year search for the Huntington disease gene10. Nevertheless, the combination of linkage mapping and individual gene sequencing in families, traditionally called positional cloning, was highly …
Read full abstract