Gemcitabine Regimen Research Articles

Sulindac (K-80003) with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine overcomes drug-resistant pancreatic cancer

The Nab-paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine (AG) regimen is the main chemotherapy regimen for pancreatic cancer, but drug resistance often occurs. Currently, the ability to promote sensitization in drug-resistant cases is an important clinical issue, and the strategy of repurposing conventional drugs is a promising strategy. This study aimed to identify a classic drug that targets chemotherapy resistance’s core signaling pathways and combine it with the AG regimen to enhance chemosensitivity. We also aimed to find reliable predictive biomarkers of drug combination sensitivity. Using RNA sequencing, we found that abnormal PI3K/Akt pathway activation plays a central role in mediating resistance to the AG regimen. Subsequently, through internal and external verification of randomly selected AG-resistant patient-derived organoid (PDO) and PDO xenograft models, we discovered for the first time that the classic anti-inflammatory drug sulindac K-80003, an inhibitor of the PI3K/Akt pathway that we focused on, promoted sensitization in half (14/28) of AG-resistant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cases. Through RNA-sequencing, multiplex immunofluorescent staining, and immunohistochemistry experiments, we identified cFAM124A as a novel biomarker through which sulindac K-80003 promotes AG sensitization. Its role as a sensitization marker is explained via the following mechanism: cFAM124A enhances both the mRNA expression of cathepsin L and the activity of the cathepsin L enzyme. This dual effect stimulates the cleavage of RXRα, leading to large amounts of truncated RXRα, which serves as a direct target of K-80003. Consequently, this process results in the pathological activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway. In summary, our study provides a new treatment strategy and novel biological target for patients with drug-resistant pancreatic cancer.

Comparative Efficacy of 21 Treatment Strategies for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

The primary treatment for operable pancreatic cancer (PC) involves surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. Nevertheless, perioperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) may be used to mitigate the likelihood of recurrence and mortality. This network meta-analysis (NMA) assesses the comparative efficacy of various treatment approaches for resectable PC. A thorough search was carried out on January 31, 2023, encompassing PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. We incorporated randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared surgical interventions with or without (neo)adjuvant or perioperative therapies for operable PC. We conducted a fixed-effects Bayesian NMA. We presented the effect sizes in terms of hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) along with 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs). The treatment was deemed statistically superior when the 95% credible interval (CrI) did not encompass a null value (hazard ratio < 1). Treatment rankings were established based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). A total of 24 studies were incorporated, comparing 21 treatments with surgery in isolation. Eleven treatments showed superior efficacy compared to surgery alone, with HRs ranging from 0.38 for perioperative treatments to 0.73 for adjuvant 5-fluorouracil. After the exclusion of studies conducted in Asia, it was found that the perioperative regimen of gemcitabine combined with nab-paclitaxel was the most effective regimen (SUCRA, p = 0.99). The findings endorse the utilization of perioperative CT, especially multi-agent CT, as the favored intervention for operable PC in Western nations.

Economic evaluation of NALIRIFOX vs. nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine regimens for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from U.S. perspective

BackgroundThe cost-effectiveness of NALIRIFOX as a potential new standard of care for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) has yet to be established. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NALIRIFOX vs. nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in this indication from the perspective of U.S. public payers.MethodsA partitioned survival model was constructed from the perspective of U.S. public payers, drawing on baseline patient characteristics and vital clinical data from the NAPOLI-3 trial. Costs and utilities were sourced from publicly accessible databases and literature. A lifetime horizon was applied, with an annual discount rate of 3%. We calculated and compared cumulative costs, life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). To evaluate the model’s robustness, sensitivity analyses, scenario analyses, and subgroup analyses were carried out. Additionally, a price simulation for the costly liposomal irinotecan was conducted to inform the pricing strategy at the given willingness to pay (WTP) threshold.ResultsIn the base-case analysis, NALIRIFOX provided an additional 0.29 QALYs with an ICER of $206,340.69 /QALY compared to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine, indicating it is not cost-effective at a $150,000/QALY threshold. Sensitivity analysis showed the model was most sensitive to the costs of liposomal irinotecan, capecitabine, and post-progression care. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 17.66% probability of NALIRIFOX being cost-effective at $150,000/QALY, rising to 47.48% at $200,000/QALY. Pricing simulations suggested NALIRIFOX could become cost-effective at $150,000/QALY if the price of irinotecan liposome drops to $53.24/mg (a 14.8% reduction).ConclusionsNALIRIFOX may not be cost-effective at its current price as a first-line treatment for patients with mPDAC in the long term. The cost of liposomal irinotecan has the greatest impact. It may become cost-effective only if its cost is reduced by 14.8%, with a WTP threshold of $150,000 /QALY.

Tumor-associated macrophages: orchestrators of cholangiocarcinoma progression.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare but highly invasive cancer, with its incidence rising in recent years. Currently, surgery remains the most definitive therapeutic option for CCA. However, similar to other malignancies, most CCA patients are not eligible for surgical intervention at the time of diagnosis. The chemotherapeutic regimen of gemcitabine combined with cisplatin is the standard treatment for advanced CCA, but its effectiveness is often hampered by therapeutic resistance. Recent research highlights the remarkable plasticity of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) within the tumor microenvironment (TME). TAMs play a crucial dual role in either promoting or suppressing tumor development, depending on the factors that polarize them toward pro-tumorigenic or anti-tumorigenic phenotypes, as well as their interactions with cancer cells and other stromal components. In this review, we critically examine recent studies on TAMs in CCA, detailing the expression patterns and prognostic significance of different TAM subtypes in CCA, the mechanisms by which TAMs influence CCA progression and immune evasion, and the potential for reprogramming TAMs to enhance anticancer therapies. This review aims to provide a framework for deeper future research.

Clinical outcomes of second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a real-world study.

Little progress has been made in recent years using first-line chemotherapy, including gemcitabine combined with nab-paclitaxel, FOLFIRINOX, and NALIRIFOX, for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APC). In addition, the optimal second-line chemotherapy regimen has not been determined. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different types of second-line chemotherapy for APC. Patients with APC who received first-line treatment from January 2008 to January 2021 were considered eligible for this retrospective analysis. The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. Four hundred and thirty-seven and 617 patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil- and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment, respectively. Demographic and clinical features, except age and liver metastasis, were comparable between the two groups (P < 0.05). The median OS was 8.8 and 7.8 months in patients who received a 5-fluorouracil- and gemcitabine-based combined regimen for first-line therapy, respectively (HR = 1.244, 95% CI = 1.090-1.419; P < 0.001). The median OS was 5.6 and 1.9 months in patients who received second-line chemotherapy and supportive care, respectively (HR = 0.766, 95% CI = 0.677-0.867; P < 0.001). The median PFS was not significantly differently between gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil monotherapy and combination therapy. A 5-fluorouracil- or gemcitabine-based combined regimen was shown to be as effective as a single 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine regimen as second-line therapy for patients with APC.

Exploring external validity of chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in real life

IntroductionCisplatin, nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, and gemcitabine (PAXG) regimen activity was assessed in a single institution phase II trial (PACT-19) on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The PACT-31 study explored the external validity of PACT-19 results. Materials and MethodsPatients aged ≥18 and ≤75 years with KPS ≥70, and PDAC diagnosis receiving PAXG in the participating institutions were eligible and categorized as follows: A) PACT-19; B) PACT-31-HSR; C) PACT-31-non-HSR. With a sample of 175 patients, assuming a target 1-year overall survival of 60 % for metastatic and of 80 % for non-metastatic patients, the trial will be considered successful with the 1-year OS falling into the 95 % CI. ResultsData from 68 PACT-19 and 168 PACT-31 patients were retrieved. After 124 events, 1yOS was 52.5 % (95 %CI: 44.6–60.4 %) for metastatic and 80.5 % (95 %CI: 71.9–89.1 %) for non-metastatic patients. Survival overlapped between PACT-19 and PACT-31-HSR (median 17.6 and 17.4 months, p = 0.21) and was significantly shorter in PACT-31-non-HSR (median 11.3 months; p = 0.03). Differences of dose-intensity, use of maintenance therapy, and treatment after progression between PACT-31-HSR and non-HSR were evidenced. DiscussionPACT-19 results have external validity. The outcome difference between HSR and non-HSR centers endorses the need of creating a hub-and-spoke network aimed at sharing the expertise on rare-diseases.

Nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (modified) in combination with oral cobimetinib and encorafenib following FOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic G12D and G12V pancreatic cancer.

e16330 Background: Pancreatic cancer is the only human cancer in which most of the tumors are KRAS mutated. A majority of the mutations occur in codon 12. Mutations percentages are as follows: G12D (50%), G12V (35%) and G12R(12%). We are reporting on a pilot study in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who have failed, or have become resistant to FOLFIRINOX. Thereafter the patients were placed on Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine in combination with oral Cobimetinib and encorafenib. Methods: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancers are typically offered modified FOLFIRINOX followed by Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine. After obtaining a written informed consent, we conducted a single arm study of patients with pathologic proven unresectable metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients who had failed FOLFRINOX were placed on a modified regimen of Gemcitabine (1000mg/m2) and Nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/M2) on days 1 and 15 every 28-day cycle. Oral medications, Cobimetinib 20 mg bid and encorafenib of 150 mg bid were given. The oral chemotherapies were administered weekdays only during the 28-day cycle. The primary end point was to determine the response rate from the time the patients were placed on Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine and the oral medication. The secondary endpoint was to assess the overall survivorship from the beginning of the therapy, and overall toxicities of the combination therapy. Twelve patients with advanced metastatic pancreatic cancer were enrolled on this pilot study. Six patients were male, and the median age was 67 years. Liver metastases were present in eight patients. Treatment was continued as long as there was no disease progression. CBC, CMP, CA19-9 was performed every other week. CT and PET scan was ordered every eight weeks. Results: Overall follow up is from 5 to 19 months (median 14 months). Segmental median survival from the start of oral therapy in conjunction with Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine is 5 months (2-9 months). As from now,all patients are alive and 10 of 12 patients are on therapy. One patient who achieved pathologic response in the liver was deemed operable, and pathologically the distal pancreatectomy demonstrated NO disease. The other patient has progressed and is not on treatment. Grade 3 non-hematological toxicities included nausea, vomiting and fatigue in 3 of 12 patients. Hematological toxicities included neutropenia and neutrophil support was needed in 6 out of 12 patients. Median survivorship has NOT been reached. In this small study, we have observed a rapid and dramatic reduction in tumor volume. Conclusions: The combination of MEK and BRAF inhibitors with chemotherapy may be potentially active in pancreatic tumors (G12D and G12V). Based on the data presented, Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine in combination with oral Cobimetinib and encorafenib needs to be further explored in a larger cohort of patients.

Efficacy of platinum chemotherapy agents in adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas.

e16317 Background: Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP) is an aggressive, infrequent subtype of pancreatic cancer that combines a glandular and squamous component and is associated with poor survival. Data regarding adjuvant therapy remain controversial. Methods: Patients with advanced PASC from 2005 to 2021 were consecutively included in this retrospective study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Eighteen PASC patients treated surgically were included (median age, 69.3 years; males, 58.2%). All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Ten patients (55%) received newer platinum based regimen combination (FOLFIRINOX) and eight patients (45%) received gemcitabine-based regimens. Platinum based regimen as compared to gemcitabine regimen showed an improvement of overall response rate (42.5% and 12.3 %, p=0.001), PFS (median,10.4 versus 3.1 months, p=0.03) and OS (median, 15.8 vs 6.9 months, p=0.21).Multivariate analysis revealed that, among all patients (n=18), the following factors were independently predictive of poor survival: margin-positive resection (HR =3,15; 95% CI, 1.5-5.9; P&lt;0.001), lymph node involvement (HR =2.9; 95% CI, 1.7 -7.5; P=0.003), and lack of inclusion of a platinum agent in the adjuvant regimen (HR =2.6; 95% CI, 1.5 -4.9; P=0.035). Conclusions: Given the rarity of ASC, optimal management remains poorly defined, particularly in the postoperative period. Therapies based on platinum chemotherapeutics may be preferable to all other chemotherapy regimens.

Clofarabine Has a Superior Therapeutic Window as compared to Gemcitabine in Preclinical Bladder Cancer Models

Current standard-of-care systemic therapy options for locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer (BC), which are predominantly based on cisplatin-gemcitabine combinations, are limited by significant treatment failure rates and frailty-based patient ineligibility. We previously addressed the urgent clinical need for better-tolerated BC therapeutic strategies using a drug screening approach, which identified outstanding antineoplastic activity of clofarabine in preclinical models of BC. To further assess clofarabine as a potential BC therapy component, we conducted head-to-head comparisons of responses to clofarabine versus gemcitabine in preclinical in vitro and in vivo models of BC, complemented by in silico analyses. In vitro data suggest a distinct correlation between the two antimetabolites, with higher cytotoxicity of gemcitabine, especially against several nonmalignant cell types, including keratinocytes and endothelial cells. Accordingly, tolerance of clofarabine (oral or intraperitoneal application) was distinctly better than for gemcitabine (intraperitoneal) in patient-derived xenograft models of BC. Clofarabine also exhibited distinctly superior anticancer efficacy, even at dosing regimens optimized for gemcitabine. Neither complete remission nor cure, both of which were observed with clofarabine, were achieved with any tolerable gemcitabine regimen. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that clofarabine has a better therapeutic window than gemcitabine, further emphasizing its potential as a candidate for drug repurposing in BC. Patient summaryWe compared the anticancer activity of clofarabine, a drug used for treatment of leukemia but not bladder cancer, and gemcitabine, a drug currently used for chemotherapy against bladder cancer. Using cell cultures and mouse models, we found that clofarabine was better tolerated and more efficacious than gemcitabine, and even cured implanted tumors in mouse models. Our results suggest that clofarabine, alone or in combination schemes, might be superior to gemcitabine for the treatment of bladder cancer.

Pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BackgroundIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Cases when found are often advanced with vascular invasion, and radical resection is often difficult. Despite curative resection, the postoperative recurrence rate of patients with histological lymph node metastasis is high, and their prognosis is poor. Therefore, there is an urgent need to establish multidisciplinary treatment that combines chemotherapy and surgical resection. The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced ICC is unclear. In this report, a case of locally advanced ICC in which pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved after NAC is described.Case presentationA 79-year-old woman was admitted to a local hospital with appetite loss. Computed tomography showed a 100 × 90 mm low-contrast tumor in the left hepatic lobe and segment 1 with invasion to the inferior vena cava (IVC), and several lymph nodes along the left gastric artery and lesser curvature were enlarged. Therefore, she was treated with a combined chemotherapy regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin. After four courses, the tumor size decreased to 30 × 60 mm without invasion to the IVC. Left hepatectomy extending to segment 1 with bile duct resection combined with middle hepatic vein resection (H1234-B-MHV), dissection of regional lymph nodes and pyloroplasty were performed. After radical resection, pCR was achieved. She is alive with no evidence of disease, 2 years after surgery.ConclusionsIn this case, a patient with locally advanced ICC achieved pCR to NAC. NAC may be effective for ICC. Patients who achieve pCR may have a better prognosis.

Biweekly gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy for older adult patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: A prospective study.

672 Background: Although the number of older adult patients (aged ≥ 75 years) with pancreatic cancer (PC) is increasing, there are still limited data regarding chemotherapy for these patients, who experience adverse events more frequently than younger patients with PC. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of biweekly gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) as first-line therapy for older adult patients with unresectable PC. Methods: We conducted a single-center prospective study. Patients aged ≥ 75 years with pathologically proven unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled after obtaining written informed consent. Patients were treated with a modified regimen of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) on days 1, 15 of every 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate, overall survival, progression-free survival, 1-year survival rate, 2-year survival rate, and adverse events. Results: From August 2018 to March 2021, 17 patients were enrolled (locally advanced 4; metastatic 13). Five patients (29.4%) were men, and the median age was 77 years (range: 75-81). The median Geriatric 8 score was 13 points (range 6-17). Biliary drainage was performed in three patients. The overall response rate was 47.1% (8/17). Disease control rate was 82.4% (14/17). Median overall survival was 16.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.9-24.6) and median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% CI: 4.9-10.1), respectively. The 1-year survival rate and 2-year survival rates were 58.8% and 29.4%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic adverse events and non-hematologic adverse events were observed in 17.6% (3/17) and 29.4% (5/17), respectively. No deaths was observed in association with biweekly GnP regimen. Conclusions: Biweekly GnP as first-line therapy can provide favorable treatment outcomes with tolerable toxicity in older adult patients with unresectable PC. Clinical trial information: jRCTs051190038 .

Prolonged progression-free survival achieved by gemcitabine, cisplatin, and albumin-bound paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers.

A regimen of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel (GPA) has shown promising results in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). This study aimed to evaluate the benefit of GPA compared to a regimen of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) in patients with aBTC. Retrospective study. Patients with aBTC who received first-line chemotherapy with GPA or GP regimen at the Samsung Medical Center between July 2020 and June 2022 were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). In all, 37 patients were treated with GPA and 43 patients with GP. The GPA group showed significantly longer median PFS [12.0 months (95% CI, 7.2-16.8)] compared to the GP group [5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7-7.4; p = 0.007)]. The median overall survival (OS) was also longer in the GPA group [18.7 months (95% CI, 13.7-23.7)] than in the GP group [10.7 months (95% CI, 1.5-19.9); p = 0.021]. First-line chemotherapy with GPA was associated with longer PFS, while metastatic disease at initial diagnosis and post-treatment increase in CA 19-9 level were associated with worse PFS. The GPA regimen improved the PFS of patients with aBTC compared to the GP regimen but showed no significant benefit in terms of OS after adjusting for confounding variables. Further large-scale studies are required to establish optimal indications for GPA.

MFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1 inhibitors versus GC/GS/GEMOX chemotherapy as a first line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

Biliary tract tumors (BTC) account for about 3% of all digestive system tumors, with rising incidence and limited treatment options, particularly for advanced stages, underscoring the need for innovative therapies. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel regimen combining hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX-HAIC) alongside lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i) compared to standard regimens of gemcitabine plus cisplatin, gemcitabine plus S1, or gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GC/GS/GEMOX) in advanced BTC patients treated from March 2019 to November 2023. A total of 89 patients were analyzed, with 55 receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and 34 receiving the GC/GS/GEMOX regimens. Among these, 23 patients were in the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group, while 24 were in the GC/GS/GEMOX group. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group was 15 months compared to 6 months for the GC/GS/GEMOX group. Similarly, the median overall survival (mOS) was 20 months for the mFOLFOXHAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group versus 13 months for the GC/GS/GEMOX group. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group were 48.5% and 87.0%, respectively, both significantly higher than those observed in the GC/GS/GEMOX group at three months of treatment. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar between the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group and the GC/GS/GEMOX group, at 86.5% and 84.2%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference in complication rates. Overall, mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i appears to be a safe and well-tolerated treatment for advanced BTC, demonstrating superior mPFS and mOS compared to standard regimens.

Safety and efficacy of a new high-dose regimen of panobinostat, gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan for 1st or 2nd salvage ASCT for refractory/relapsed or high-risk myeloma: Matched-pair comparisons with concurrent control cohorts.

Improvement of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for myeloma is needed. Building on our prior work, we prospectively evaluated panobinostat and gemcitabine/busulfan/melphalan (GemBuMel) with ASCT in this population. Patients aged 18-65 years with relapsed/refractory or high-risk myeloma and adequate end-organ function were eligible. Treatment included panobinostat (20 mg/day, days -9 to -2) and GemBuMel (days -8 to -2). Patients were enrolled in 1st (ASCT-1) or 2nd ASCT (ASCT-2) cohorts. We compared their outcomes with all our other concurrent ASCT patients who met eligibility criteria but received melphalan or BuMel off study, matched for age, prior therapy lines, high-risk cytogenetics, and response at ASCT. We enrolled 80 patients, 48 and 32 in the ASCT-1 and ASCT-2 cohorts, respectively; in these two cohorts, high-risk cytogenetics were noted in 33 and 15 patients, respectively; unresponsive disease in 12 and 11 patients, respectively, after a median of 2 and 3 therapy lines, respectively. Transplant-related mortality (TRM) occurred in two ASCT-2 patients. One-year PFS rates were 69% (ASCT-1) and 72% (ASCT-2); 1-year OS rates were 79% (ASCT-1) and 84% (ASCT-2). Minimal residual disease negativity improved after ASCT-1 (8.5%-23%, p < .0001) and ASCT-2 (34%-55%, p = .02), which correlated with improved outcomes. Trial patients and controls (N = 371) had similar TRM and post-ASCT maintenance. Trial patients had better PFS after either a 1st (p = .02) or a 2nd ASCT (p = .04) than matched-paired control patients. In conclusion, panobinostat/GemBuMel is effective for relapsed/refractory or high-risk myeloma patients, with better PFS than concurrent matched controls receiving melphalan or BuMel.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the cystic duct: A case report and literature review.

Pure squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the gallbladder is a rare malignant biliary tract tumor predominantly found in the body and neck of the gallbladder. However, its occurrence in the cystic duct is even rarer. Given its rarity, no established guidelines or consensus currently exist regarding the treatment of pure SCC of the gallbladder. We report an unusual case of SCC originating from the cystic duct with the intent of providing insights into the therapeutic approach for this type of malignancy. A male patient presented to our hospital with acute cholecystitis. Unexpectedly, imaging revealed gallbladder malignancy. Pathologic examination after surgery confirmed SCC of the cystic duct. Despite elevated bilirubin levels, we were able to exclude hilar involvement, enabling radical tumor resection. Intraoperatively, we discovered that the tumor was located in the cystic duct, a site associated with a high likelihood of invasion into neighboring organs. The tumor demonstrated a predominantly exophytic growth pattern, which prompted us to refrain from extending the resection range, thereby striking a balance between complete tumor removal and surgical trauma. We performed liver wedge resection only to ensure a negative resection margin while preserving the anatomical structure to the greatest extent possible. Postoperative recovery was rapid and uncomplicated. Pathological examination confirmed pure SCC, which led us to initiate a regimen of nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin, which is known to be effective in other organ SCCs. Remarkably, the patient experienced a rare and severe posttreatment cardiovascular event. Consequently, we switched the patient to a chemotherapy regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin, which ultimately yielded positive clinical outcomes. no evidence of tumor recurrence was observed within 1 year after surgery. The diagnosis and therapeutic strategy for rare tumors such as gallbladder SCC should be meticulously tailored based on their unique characteristics to optimize postoperative patient outcomes.

The efficacy and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

A recovery period between surgery and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is common in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), which can progress after a relatively long time. Therefore, the efficacy of AC initiated within 90 days after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) was evaluated in UTUC patients at stage ≥pT2 (N0-3M0), in addition to the effect of delayed AC initiation on survival outcomes. Clinical data for 428 UTUC patients diagnosed with transitional cell carcinoma with postoperatively confirmed pathological stages, muscle-invasive or greater-stage (pT2-4) disease, any nodal status, and metastasis-free (M0) disease were retrospectively analyzed. All patients who received AC were treated within 90 days after RNU and underwent at least 4 cycles of the AC procedure. Then, patients receiving AC were divided into the "within 45 days" and "45 to 90 days" groups according to the time interval between RNU and AC initiation. Their clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated and the survival outcomes of the 2 groups were compared. Any adverse events that occurred during the AC process were also recorded. A total of 428 patients were analyzed in the study, including 132 individuals who underwent the AC procedure with platinum in combination with gemcitabine within 90 days after RNU and 296 patients who failed to initiate AC within 90 days. The median age of all patients was 68 years (mean 67, range 28-90 years), and the median follow-up was 25 months (mean 36, range 1-129 months). There were no significant differences in age, sex, lymph node metastasis, tumor location, hydronephrosis status, hematuria status, cancer grade, or multifocality between the 2 groups. Individuals undergoing AC initiated within 90 days of RNU showed a significantly decreased mortality relative to those patients who did not receive AC. Shorter intervals between RNU and AC initiation within 45 days vs. 45-90 days did not improve patient OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS) and may have increased the incidence of adverse events. The present study data supported the finding that a platinum-based combination with gemcitabine regimen initiated postoperatively significantly improved OS and CSS in patients with UTUC at stages ≥pT2 (N0-3M0). Furthermore, no survival benefit was evident in patients who started AC within 45 days after RNU compared to those who received AC within 45 to 90 days.

Comparison of different second line treatments for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BackgroundIn metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), first line treatment options usually include combination regimens of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX or mFOLFIRINOX) or gemcitabine based regimens such as in combination with albumin-bound paclitaxel (GEM + nab-PTX). After progression, multiple regimens including NALIRI + 5-FU and folinic acid, FOLFIRINOX, 5-FU-based oxaliplatin doublets (OFF, FOLFOX, or XELOX), or 5-FU-based monotherapy (FL, capecitabine, or S-1) are considered appropriate by major guidelines. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy of different treatment strategies tested as second-line regimens for patients with mPDAC after first-line gemcitabine-based systemic treatment.MethodsRandomized phase II and III clinical trials (RCTs) were included if they were published or presented in English. Trials of interest compared two active systemic treatments as second-line regimens until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. We performed a Bayesian NMA with published hazard ratios (HRs) and 95%confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of different second-line therapies for mPDAC. The main outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were grade 3–4 toxicities. We calculated the relative ranking of agents for each outcome as their surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA). A higher SUCRA score meant a higher ranking for efficacy outcomes.ResultsA NMA of 9 treatments was performed for OS (n = 2521 patients enrolled). Compared with 5-FU + folinic acid both irinotecan or NALIRI + fluoropyrimidines had a trend to better OS (HR = 0.76, 95%CI 0.21–2.75 and HR = 0.74, 95%CI 0.31–1.85). Fluoropyrimidines + folinic acid + oxaliplatin were no better than the combination without oxaliplatin. The analysis of treatment ranking showed that the combination of NALIRI + 5-FU + folinic acid was most likely to yield the highest OS results (SUCRA = 0.7). Furthermore, the NMA results indicated that with the highest SUCRA score (SUCRA = 0.91), NALIRI + 5-FU + folinic acid may be the optimal choice for improved PFS amongst all regimens studied.ConclusionsAccording to the NMA results, NALIRI + 5-FU, and folinic acid may represent the best second-line treatment for improved survival outcomes in mPDAC. Further evidence from prospective trials is needed to determine the best treatment option for this group of patients.

Clinical utility of an international multidisciplinary virtual tumor board for fibrolamellar carcinoma.

e18624 Background: Fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC) is a rare liver cancer with approximately 1500 new cases per year, worldwide. The lack of expertise locally often incurs significant travel for patients (pts). Virtual consults have improved access to expertise but identifying the best experts for an ultra-rare condition is difficult for pts and families and multidisciplinary tumor boards of experts offer better clinical guidance. Foundations and advocacy groups play a vital role in navigation and support for pts with rare cancers. Methods: Pts with FLC and their local treating oncologists were engaged by the FibroFighters Foundation and offered a multidisciplinary virtual tumor board (VTB) review. Each VTB included the local treating oncologist, a patient advocate, a molecular pharmacologist, and international experts in the clinical management of FLC including at least one medical oncologist, one radiation oncologist, one interventional radiologist, and one surgical oncologist. Each VTB reviewed the pts’ clinical history and relevant imaging and discussed surgical, radiological, and systemic approaches. Pts consented to the observational research protocol XCELSIOR ( NCT03793088 ) to enable longitudinal clinical summaries to be prepared and for outcomes to be annotated. Results: Between August 4th 2022 and February 9th, 2023, the VTB held a total of 71 discussions for 59 unique pts (12 discussed more than once): 12 new diagnoses, 28 relapses, 14 treatment failures, and 5 ongoing care. Median age at diagnosis of pts was 18 years (range 6-44 years). Pts were seen at 44 institutions/practices across 22 states and 4 countries (USA, Australia, Switzerland, and the Netherlands). A total of 36 unique treatment regimens were discussed, with 21 unique consensus top-ranked options delivered to treating oncologists. The most common consensus options included regimens of gemcitabine, lenvatinib, and nivolumab (13), interventional radiology (IR, 11), surgical resection (6), and a regimen of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and lenvatinib (6). The primary team implemented the VTB recommendations 60 times out of 71 (85%): change in systemic therapy (33), IR (11), continue current regimen (11), surgery (6), radiation oncology (2). Conclusions: This is the first demonstration of a patient-focused international multidisciplinary VTB for FLC. The high rate of recommendation adoption by local treating oncologists suggests this is a valuable service to improve patient care. Outcomes are being collected prospectively in a master observational research protocol to better define clinical utility.

A NOVEL CONDITIONING REGIMEN OF CHIDAMIDE, CLADRIBINE, GEMCITABINE, AND BUSULFAN (CHICGB) IN THE AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION OF AGGRESSIVE T‐CELL LYMPHOMA

Background: The prognosis of patients with peripheral T-cell (PTCL) or lymphoblastic T-cell lymphoma (T-LBL) remains poor under current conditioning regimens before receiving autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Methods: Patients with PTCL or T-LBL were enrolled to receiviing ASCT using the conditioning regimen of chidamide, cladribine, gemcitabine and busulfan (ChiCGB). Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) was used to evaluate the response to ASCT. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were employed to assess patient outcome, and adverse events were used to assess the safety of the regimen. The survival curve was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Twenty-five PTCL and 11 T-LBL patients were recruited. The median time to white blood cell (WBC) and platelet engraftments were 10 days (8–13 days) and 13 days (9–31 days), respectively. The 3-year PFS and OS were 81.3 ± 7.2% and 88.5 ± 5.4% for all patients; 92.0 ± 5.4% and 81.2 ± 8.8% for PTCL patients; and both 81.8 ± 11.6% for T-LBL patients, respectively. The 3-year PFS and OS were both 92.9 ± 4.9% for patients with complete response (CR), but 50.0 ± 17.7% and 75.0 ± 15.3% for patients with non-CR, respectively. Infection was the most common non-hematological toxicity, and all toxicities were mild and controllable. Conclusions: ChiCGB was a potentially effective and well-tolerated conditioning regimen to improve the prognosis of patients with aggressive T-cell lymphoma. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to further assess ChiCGB as conditioning regimen for ASCT. Keywords: Aggressive T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Chemotherapy, Stem Cell Transplant No conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract.

Phase 2 trial of intravesical cabazitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin (CGC) for the treatment of non-muscle invasive BCG unresponsive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

TPS4616 Background: For patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) unresponsive to Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG), multi-agent intravesical trials have been limited. The goal of this Phase 2 study is to investigate the efficacy of intravesical chemotherapy consisting of sequential cabazitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin (CGC) in the salvage setting. Phase 1 results reporting on 18 subjects demonstrated adverse events limited to local Grade 1 and 2 toxicities. Partial funding support for the trial was provided by a pharmaceutical company. Methods: This is a Phase 2 trial (NCT02202772) presently enrolling patients with BCG unresponsive NMIBC as defined by the FDA who refuse or are ineligible for radical cystectomy. All patients undergo pre-treatment transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and a 6-week regimen of intravesical cisplatin (100mg), gemcitabine (2gm), and cabazitaxel (5mg). Each drug is instilled weekly except for cisplatin, which is given every other week. Complete response is defined as having no evidence of cancer on post-induction biopsy and negative urine cytology at 3 months. Complete responders proceed with monthly and bimonthly maintenance therapy without cisplatin in the first and second years, respectively, for a total of 24 months. Results: To date thirty-one patients have been enrolled (with target accrual of 33), of whom seven are female. One patient withdrew consent before first evaluation cystoscopy. Mean age thus far is 72 years. All patients have previously received at least two prior induction cycles of BCG, and meet FDA criteria for BCG unresponsive disease. All patients have biopsy proven high grade disease at enrollment; 8 (27%) have high grade T1 disease; and 20 (67%) patients have CIS. Conclusions: Salvage options for BCG unresponsive NMIBC are limited. The CGC protocol has been demonstrated to be safe in a previous Phase 1 study, and accrual for this Phase 2 is near completion. Clinical trial information: NCT02202772 .