Gastrointestinal Varices Research Articles

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided vascular interventions.

With the recent development of interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), EUS-guided vascular interventions have seen increased clinical and research focus. This modality can be used to diagnose portal hypertension and treat portal hypertension-related gastrointestinal varices and refractory gastrointestinal hemorrhage, including pseudoaneurysm. The vascular embolic materials used for treatment include tissue adhesives (cyanoacrylates), sclerosants, thrombin, and vascular embolic coils, all of which are associated with favorable results. The feasibility of EUS-guided procedures, including portal vein stenting and portosystemic shunt formation conventionally performed percutaneously and transvenously, has also been demonstrated, albeit in animal studies. As EUS-guided vascular intervention is a technique that may receive significant attention in the future, we provide a thorough review of the current evidence for its use.

Factors Affecting an Increase in Spleen Volume and Association of Spleen Volume Variation with the Clinical Outcomes of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis

Plain Language SummaryImmunotherapy is now the standard of care for systemic therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) is recommended for the first-line treatment, while gastrointestinal varices rupture is likely to be observed during Atez/Bev. Gastrointestinal varices rupture is a fatal event and developed due to portal hypertension. Spleen volume (SpV) plays an important role in portal hypertension based on previous studies, and we examined variation in SpV during Atez/Bev treatment and investigated predictive factors that affect the increase in SpV and the association of SpV variation and pretreatment SpV with the clinical outcome of Atez/Bev. The median pretreatment SpV was 184 (130–257) cm3 and the median SpV variation was 27 (9–60) cm3. An increase in the SpV was observed in 140 patients (85.4%). Age <74 years (p = 0.03), mALBI grade 2b or 3 (p = 0.03), and pretreatment SpV ≥184 cm3 (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with increased SpV. The present study revealed that there were no significant differences in progression-free survival and overall survival between patients with and without pretreatment spleen enlargement, as well as between patients with SpV variation ≥25 cm³ and those with SpV variation <25 cm³. In conclusion, caution is warranted to detect the aggravation of portal hypertension when administering Atez/Bev to young patients or those with an impaired liver function or pretreatment spleen enlargement. The impact of spleen modulation by Atez/Bev appears to be limited on clinical efficacy.

Clinical Analysis of Sinistral Portal Hypertension.

Sinistral portal hypertension (SPH) is the only type of portal hypertension that is entirely curable. However, it can easily cause varicose veins in the esophagus and/or stomach, as well as upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and treatments of sinistral portal hypertension. All patients with pancreatic disease were included in this retrospective cohort study at the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (Luzhou, China) from September 2019 to September 2021. The required information including the patient's demographics, serum laboratory indicators, imaging and endoscopy examinations, and clinical features were gathered and evaluated. The results were expressed as numbers and percentages. Out of the 830 patients with pancreatic diseases, 61 (7.3%) developed SPH. The most common cause of SPH was acute pancreatitis (80.3%), followed by chronic pancreatitis (11.5%). The splenic vein was the most frequently affected vein in patients (45/61, 73.8%). The findings of the contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) indicated that 51 cases (83.6%) had gastric fundal-body varices, and three cases had combined gastric and esophageal varices. In the perigastric collateral channel formation, gastroepiploic varices (43/61, 70.5%) most frequently occurred in patients with SPH. Splenomegaly was a prevalent manifestation in SPH patients (45.9%). Five cases had gastrointestinal variceal hemorrhage. SPH was associated with the patency of the splenic vein and the formation of distinctive perigastric collateral veins. Surgery and/or endoscopic treatment were recommended, particularly for patients who have experienced a significant amount of gastrointestinal bleeding and have failed conservative treatment.

The Surgical Management of Severe Scoliosis in Immature Patient with a Very Rare Disease Costello Syndrome-Clinical Example and Brief Literature Review.

Costello syndrome (CS) is a rare genetic syndrome in which, due to the occurrence of a mutation in the HRAS gene on chromosome 11 that causes the manifestation, a set of features such as a characteristic appearance, many congenital defects, intellectual disability and a genetic predisposition to cancer, friendly personality, and others can be identified. CS is very rare, with an incidence of ~1/300,000, but it belongs to one of the largest groups of congenital syndromes, called RASopathies, occurring with an incidence of 1/1000 people. Scoliosis and kyphosis, as well as other spinal defects, are common, in 63% and 58% of patients, respectively, and a study conducted among adult patients showed the presence of scoliosis in 75% of patients; there may be excessive lordosis of the lumbar section and inverted curvatures of the spine (lordosis in the thoracic section and kyphosis in the lumbar section). The aim of our study is to present a case report of treatment of severe scoliosis of 130 degrees in a 14-year-old patient with Costello syndrome, with coexisting Chiari II syndrome and syrinx in the absence of skeletal maturity. This patient underwent foramen magnum decompression 3 months before planned surgical correction for severe scoliosis. The patient was qualified for surgical treatment using magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR). After spine surgery using MCGR, we gradually performed MCGR distraction over the next 2 years; we performed the final surgery, conversion to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with simultaneous multi-level Ponte osteotomy, which gave a very good and satisfactory surgical result. In the perioperative period, two serious complications occurred: pneumothorax caused by central catheter and gastrointestinal bleeding due to previously undiagnosed gastrointestinal varices. This case shows that the treatment of severe and neglected scoliosis is complicated and requires special preparation and a surgical plan with other cooperating specialists. The scoliosis was corrected from 130 degrees to approximately 48 degrees, sagittal balance was significantly improved, and the surgical outcome was very pleasing, significantly improving quality of life and function for the patient.

Management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal hypertension and variceal bleeding during receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy: Beyond and known frontiers

AbstractHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a significant global burden, with most patients being diagnosed at an advanced stage, leading to poor prognosis due to the lack of systemic treatment. The approval of oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors, and anti‐angiogenic agents has rapidly expanded the treatment prospects for HCC. However, the use of these drugs has also increased the incidence of portal hypertension (PHT) and upper gastrointestinal variceal bleeding in HCC patients. The diagnosis, screening, emergency treatment, and secondary prevention of upper gastrointestinal variceal rebleeding in advanced HCC patients undergoing oral TKIs therapy have become clinically urgent and critical issues. This review provides an overview of the existing understanding regarding the uses and limitations of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion for managing HCC in cirrhosis patients with PHT and variceal hemorrhage. Additionally, it explores the potential of TIPS in managing acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding and preventing rebleeding in advanced HCC patients undergoing TKIs therapy. The placement of TIPS within the treatment hierarchy is determined by the specific clinical environment and the individual attributes of the patient.

Liver cirrhosis with its complications: Case report in a young female patient

Liver cirrhosis is a chronic disease characterized by the presence of fibrosis and regeneration of nodules in the liver, the consequence of which is the development of portal hypertension and liver failure. Usually associated with infectious infectious diseases such as viral hepatitis, alcohol consumption, metabolic syndrome, autoimmune processes, storage diseases, toxic substances and drugs. Major complications include gastrointestinal variceal bleeding, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis infection, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatocellular carcinoma.&#x0D; A 23-year-old woman comes to the ER, dr. Soegiri Lamongan with complaints of vomiting blood. The patient also complained of black bloody stools. Referred patient from Intan Medika Hospital with the initial complaint of vomiting blood more than 5 times (± equivalent to one medium drinking bottle) four days ago. On examination also found anemic conjunctiva and found splenomegaly. On abdominal ultrasound examination, the liver was shrunken, the edges were obtuse angles, partially irregular, parenchymal echo intensity was heterogeneous, v.hepatica was normal, liver fibrosis staging was 11.81 kPa, no masses or nodules were seen. The conclusion on endoscopic examination was the presence of grade III esophageal varices, congestive gastropathy, and erosive gastritis.&#x0D; Liver cirrhosis is a disease that has various etiologies. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment in cirrhotic patients with complications is one way to improve patient survival

Practical Strategies Related to the Application of Balloon Tamponade Therapy in Acute Variceal Bleeding.

IMPORTANCE:Acute gastrointestinal variceal hemorrhage is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic liver disease. Approximately one-third of cirrhotic patients will have variceal hemorrhage, and each bleeding episode is associated with up to 20% mortality. Balloon tamponade devices are used to achieve temporary hemostasis of bleeding esophagogastric varices and as a bridge to definitive therapy. Rapid and proper placement is crucial in a life-threatening bleed both to improve patient’s chances of survival and minimize procedural complications. Passage of the tube can be complicated by coiling in the oropharynx or mid-esophagus particularly if an endotracheal tube is in place or the patient has large variceal burden. Endoscopic placement can be a useful adjunct but may not be readily accessible depending on resources and availability of specialists. Here, we describe a technique of balloon tamponade placement using a stiffening guidewire to overcome this challenge.OBJECTIVES:The objectives were to: 1) describe the guidewire method for balloon tamponade tube placement and 2) highlight proof of concept through clinical application.DESIGN:We conducted a retrospective case series of patients treated with balloon tamponade using the guidewire method.SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS:This study was done at a single-center quaternary-care facility. Patients admitted to the surgical ICU and treated with a balloon tamponade device for acute variceal hemorrhage were included.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:Patient characteristics were assessed including age, sex, model for end stage liver disease score, etiology of cirrhosis, and definitive treatment received.RESULTS:Nine patients were included in the final analysis. Mean age was 50 ± 19, and mean model for end stage liver disease was 39 ± 8. Alcohol cirrhosis was the most common cause of cirrhosis in this sample (n = 5). Six patients were able to be bridged to definitive treatment.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:Guidewire-assisted balloon tamponade placement is practical, is effective, and can be performed by acute care providers.

Sinistral Portal Hypertension after Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Splenic Vein Resection: Pathogenesis and Its Prevention.

Simple SummaryExtensive portal vein (PV) resection, including porto-mesenterico-splenic confluence (PMSC) during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) may sometimes be necessary for pancreatic head cancer, if the tumor is close to the portal venous system. However, as a late-onset postoperative complication, this extensive PV resection may result in sinistral portal hypertension (SPH) and cause variceal bleeding due to congested venous flow from the spleen. Since the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer has improved, owing to the development of chemotherapy and surgical techniques, SPH is no longer a negligible matter in the field of pancreatic cancer surgery. This review clarifies the pathogenesis and frequency of SPH after PD with PMSC resection and discusses its prediction and prevention.To achieve curative resection for pancreatic cancer during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), extensive portal vein (PV) resection, including porto-mesenterico-splenic confluence (PMSC), may sometimes be necessary if the tumor is close to the portal venous system. Recently, this extended resection has been widely accepted in high-volume centers for pancreatic resection due to its favorable outcomes compared with non-operative treatment. However, in patients with long-term survival, sinistral portal hypertension (SPH) occurs as a late-onset postoperative complication. These patients present gastrointestinal varices due to congested venous flow from the spleen, which may cause critical variceal bleeding. Since the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer has improved, owing to the development of chemotherapy and surgical techniques, SPH is no longer a negligible matter in the field of pancreatic cancer surgery. This review clarifies the pathogenesis and frequency of SPH after PD through PMSC resection and discusses its prediction and prevention.

S2906 Medical Management of Variceal Bleeding Associated With Portal Hypertension Secondary to Significant Metastatic Burden in the Liver: Strategies for Reducing Rebleeding Events

Introduction: Portal hypertension (pHTN) is a cirrhosis complication that can uncommonly develop in patients with high liver metastatic tumor burden, especially those undergoing oxaliplatin chemotherapy. Symptomatic pHTN, such as gastrointestinal variceal bleeding, can complicate oncological management. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) may not be a safe option, but medical therapy strategies are lacking. Case Description/Methods: A 70-year-old male with a history of colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the liver, status-post ileocolectomy and end-ileostomy with mucus fistula, and treated with oxaliplatin-bevacizumab based therapy, presented twice in one week to the emergency department with acute anemia and bleeding from his mucus fistula and then his ostomy. Abdominal CT at presentation was notable for progressed metastatic tumor burden in the liver and splenomegaly, raising concern for developing pHTN. Vascular abdominal ultrasound showed umbilical vein recanalization. EGD revealed small esophageal varices and moderate portal hypertensive gastropathy, but ileoscopy did not show a bleeding source. Venography studies showed peri-fistular and stomal varices, which were successfully treated with transcutaneous sclerotherapy, and subsequent direct portal pressure of 16mmHg. Given high rebleeding risk, the patient required long-term therapies for pHTN management. His malignancy burden and hypercoagulable risk precluded him from TIPS. Medical management was recommended, patient started on carvedilol 12.5 mg twice daily and atorvastatin was increased to 80mg daily; he was discharged without further bleeding to date. Discussion: This case illustrates a difficult case of pHTN that can be can be associated with both metastatic liver burden but also fibrosis associated with oxaliplatin therapy. Bevacizumab is an additional cause for increased bleeding risk and poor wound healing. Oncologic regimens may also need to be altered given the new pHTN occurrence. While data support the use of beta blockers and statins in pHTN and variceal bleeding management, much of this evidence comes from cirrhosis literature. Further investigation into pharmacologic management of portal hypertension in patients with significant metastatic burden in the liver. Interestingly, the downregulation of VEGF synthesis by high-dose statins may assist with anti-angiogenesis effect of bevacizumab and may be of interest for future clinical research.Figure 1.: Figure 1a - CT imaging showing metastatic burden to the liver; figure 1b -- venography showing peristomal varices.Table 1.: Pertinent lab values at various points of disease course from diagnosis of metastatic cancer onward.

Sarcopenia as a prognostic predictor of liver cirrhosis: a multicentre study in China.

BackgroundDiagnostic criteria for sarcopenia have not been established in Chinese. This study established criteria based on the L3‐skeletal muscle index (L3‐SMI) and assessed its value for outcomes predicting in cirrhotic Chinese patients.MethodsTotally 911 subjects who underwent a CT scan at two centres were enrolled in Cohort 1 (394 male and 417 female subjects, aged 20–80 years). The data of those subjects younger than 60 years (365 male and 296 female subjects) were used to determine the reference intervals of the L3‐SMI and its influencing factors. Cohort 2 consisted of 480 patients (286 male and 184 female patients) from three centres, and their data were used to investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia and evaluate the value of L3‐SMI for predicting the prognosis and complications of cirrhosis.ResultsAge and sex had the greatest effects on the L3‐SMI (P < 0.001). The L3‐SMI scores were clearly higher in male patients than in female patients (52.94 ± 8.41 vs. 38.91 ± 5.65 cm2/m2, P < 0.001) and sharply declined in subjects aged ≥ 60 years. Based on the mean −1.28 × SD among adults aged < 60 years, the L3‐SMI cut‐off value for sarcopenia was 44.77 cm2/m2 in male patients and 32.50 cm2/m2 in female patients. Using these values, 22.5% of the cirrhotic patients (28.7% of male patients and 11.9% of female patients) were diagnosed with sarcopenia. Compared with non‐sarcopenia individuals, sarcopenia patients had lower body mass index (21.28 ± 3.01 vs. 24.09 ± 3.39 kg/m2, P < 0.001) and serum albumin levels (31.54 ± 5.93 vs. 32.93 ± 5.95 g/L, P = 0.032), longer prothrombin times (16.39 ± 3.05 vs. 15.71 ± 3.20 s, P = 0.049), higher total bilirubin concentrations (41.33 ± 57.38 vs. 32.52 ± 31.48 μmol/L, P = 0.039), worse liver function (Child–Pugh score, 8.05 ± 2.11 vs. 7.32 ± 2.05, P = 0.001), higher prevalence of cirrhosis‐related complications (81.82% vs. 62.24%, P < 0.001) and mortality (30.68% vs. 11.22%, P < 0.001). Overall survival was significantly lower in the sarcopenia group [risk ratio (RR) = 2.643, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.646–4.244, P < 0.001], accompanied with an increased cumulative incidence of ascites (RR = 1.827, 95% CI 1.259–2.651, P = 0.002), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (RR = 3.331, 95% CI 1.404–7.903, P = 0.006), hepatic encephalopathy (RR = 1.962, 95% CI 1.070–3.600, P = 0.029), and upper gastrointestinal varices (RR = 2.138, 95% CI 1.319–3.466, P = 0.002). Subgroup analysis showed sarcopenia shortened the survival of the patients with Model For End‐Stage Liver Disease score > 14 (RR = 4.310, 95% CI 2.091–8.882, P < 0.001) or Child–Pugh C (RR = 3.081, 95% CI 1.516–6.260, P = 0.002).ConclusionsSarcopenia is a common comorbidity of cirrhosis and can be used to predict cirrhosis‐related complications and the prognosis.

Relation of Magnetic Resonance Elastography to Fontan Circulatory Failure in a Cohort of Pediatric and Adult Patients.

Elevated magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)-derived liver stiffness may be associated with worse outcomes in people with Fontan circulation. We sought to evaluate the association between liver stiffness and Fontan failure or portal hypertension. Single center cross-sectional retrospective study of people with Fontan circulation who underwent MRE between 2011 and 2020. The cohort was divided into adult (age ≥ 21years) and pediatric (< 21years) groups. Fontan circulatory failure (FF) was defined as any of the following: death, transplantation, ventricular assist device, heart failure symptoms requiring escalation of diuretics. Radiologic portal hypertension was defined as the presence of one or more of the following: splenomegaly, ascites, or gastrointestinal varices. 128 patients were included (average age = 22.6 ± 8.7years) and 58 (45%) were children. Median liver stiffness was 4.3kPa (interquartile range (IQR) 3.8-5.8) for the entire cohort. Thirty patients (23%) developed FF (16 adults, 14 children). Liver stiffness was higher in adults with FF compared to those without FF (4.9 (IQR 4.0-6.0) vs. 4.2 (IQR 3.8-4.7) kPa, p = 0.04). There was no difference in liver stiffness between pediatric patients with and without FF (4.4 (IQR 4.1-5.4) vs. 4.4 (IQR 3.8-5.0), p = 0.5). Adults with radiologic portal hypertension and adults with moderate or severe atrioventricular valve regurgitation had higher liver stiffness than adults without. MRE-derived liver stiffness is associated with atrioventricular valve regurgitation, portal hypertension, and poor clinical outcomes in adults with Fontan circulation. There was no association between liver stiffness and FF in pediatric patients. This difference may be due to the progressive nature of Fontan-associated liver disease.

Endoscopic Detection and Management of Esophagogastric Varices.

IntroductionGastrointestinal (GI) varices are abnormally dilated submucosal veins in the digestive tract caused due to portal hypertension. Esophagus and stomach are common locations of varices induced by portal hypertension. Their presence correlates with the severity of the liver disease. Endoscopic variceal band ligation is one of the preferred methods for bleeding and nonbleeding large varices to decrease bleeding risk. Tissue adhesives such as N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate have been used for gastric variceal obturation.MethodsThis descriptive study was conducted in the Department of Gastroenterology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal, from March 2014 to January 2020. The endoscopic detection of esophageal and gastric varices was observed. Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) was done for esophageal varices and injection of N-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate for gastric varices.ResultsEsopahageal varices were detected in 1266 patients (8%) and gastric varices were in 36 patients (0.2%) among 15,657 patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy. Nine hundred seven (71.6%) were male. Large esophageal varices were endoscopically detected in 54.8% patients, small varices in 31.4% and both (large and small varices) in 13.4%. EVL was done in 30.7% and EVL with cyanoacrylate glue injection in 35 patients (2.7%).ConclusionEsophageal and gastric varices are seen commonly in patients with chronic liver disease. This study was conducted to describe the different types of GI varices in patients undergoing UGI endoscopy. Variceal band ligation for esophageal varices and glue injection for gastric varices are viable options of management.

Recanalization of Chronic Noncirrhotic, Nonmalignant Splanchnic Thromboses is Feasible: A Transsplenic Assisted Patient-Tailored Approach

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of recanalization of chronic noncirrhotic, nonmalignant splanchnic thromboses with a transsplenic assisted patient-tailored approach with or without transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation. In this retrospective study, 10 patients (median age, 48.4 years; interquartile range, 5.1 years) underwent revascularization between November 2016 and August 2020. Portal cavernoma was present in all patients, with complete splenic vein thrombosis in 70%. The technical success rate was 80%. Additional TIPS creation was performed in 5 (50%) patients. At a median follow-up of 19.3 months (interquartile range, 17.9 months), the primary and secondary patency rate was 70% and 100%, respectively. During follow-up, 1 patient died due to recurrent upper gastrointestinal variceal hemorrhage. In conclusion, percutaneous transsplenic assisted recanalization of chronic noncirrhotic, nonmalignant splanchnic thromboses is feasible. However, multiple access points may still be needed. Additional TIPS creation appears to be necessary only in case of insufficient portal venous flow into the liver.

Impact of Portal Vein Thrombosis on Endoscopic Variceal Band Ligation in Liver Cirrhosis

Background. Portal vein (PV) thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication of liver cirrhosis and can refer to thrombosis within the PV that can extend to its left or right branches and in some cases to the superior mesenteric vein or the splenic vein (Chawla and Bodh, 2015). For severe PVT patients, there are possibilities of increasing PV resistance and reduction of the blood flow though PV towards liver, which exacerbate liver function damage meanwhile elevating the gastrointestinal variceal bleeding risk. Endoscopic Variceal band ligation (EVL) is often used to prevent esophageal variceal bleeding; postoperative complications such as severe gastrointestinal bleeding and bleeding-related death, fever, retrosternal pain, and esophageal stenosis may appear. There was absence of the research which evaluated the impact of PVT in liver cirrhosis on the complication of endoscopic Variceal band ligation for now. We herein aimed to compare cirrhosis patients with and without PVT of recent complications after EVL. Method. We established the retrospective investigation on 144 consecutive cirrhosis patients (excluding patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and who received portal vein-systemic circulation devascularization or shunt surgery, splenectomy, hepatectomy, liver transplantation, transjugular intrahepatic portal vein stent shunt (TIPS), endoscopic varices Variceal ligation, or sclerotherapy before) who have received first endoscopic esophageal varices band ligation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center of the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, ZheJiang University, between January 2014 and December 2017. Portal vein Doppler ultrasonography, liver computerized tomography (CT), and angiography or liver-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were applied to evaluate the portal vein thrombosis of each patient before EVL. There were 18 patients confirmed with portal vein thrombosis while the other 126 patients without PVT. The primary end point for this research is the upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and related death occurred from the date of ligation until leaving hospital, and the secondary end point is the appearance of postoperative fever and retrosternal pain. Results. There are no significant differences of gastrointestinal bleeding, bleeding-related death, fever, or retrosternal pain after EVL and the length of hospital stays between cirrhotic patients with or without PVT ( P = 0.34 , 0.51 , 0.58 , 0.61 , 0.88 ). Conclusion. Liver cirrhosis with portal vein thrombosis did not increase incidence of recent complications of the endoscopic Variceal band ligation.

Beta-blockers versus placebo or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis.

Portal hypertension commonly accompanies advanced liver disease and often gives rise to life-threatening complications, including haemorrhage from oesophageal and gastrointestinal varices. Variceal haemorrhage commonly occurs in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. Therefore, prevention is important. Band ligation, beta-blockers, and sclerotherapy have been proposed as alternatives for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children. However, primary prophylaxis is not the current standard of care in paediatric patients because it is unknown whether those treatments are of benefit or harm when used for primary prophylaxis in children and adolescents. To determine the benefits and harms of beta-blockers compared with placebo or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and Science Citation Index Expanded (April 2020). We screened the reference lists of the retrieved publications and manually searched the main paediatric gastroenterology and hepatology conference (NASPGHAN and ESPGHAN) abstract books from 2008 to December 2019. We searched clinicaltrials.gov, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the World Health Organization (WHO) for ongoing clinical trials. We imposed no language or document type restrictions on our search. We planned to include randomised clinical trials, irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status to assess benefits and harms. We included observational studies, retrieved with the searches for randomised clinical trials, for a narrative report of harm. We planned to summarise data from randomised clinical trials by standard Cochrane methodologies. We planned to asses risk of bias and use GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events and liver-related morbidity, and health-related quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were oesophageal variceal bleeding and adverse events not considered serious. We planned to use intention-to-treat principle. We planned to analyse data with RevMan Analysis. We found no randomised clinical trials that assessed beta-blockers compared with sham or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. We found four observational studies that reported on harms. As a systematic search for observational studies was not planned, we only listed the reported harms in a table. Randomised clinical trials assessing the benefits or harms of beta-blockers versus placebo or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis are lacking. Therefore, trials with adequate power and proper design, assessing the benefits and harms of beta-blockers versus placebo on patient-relevant clinical outcomes, such as mortality, quality of life, failure to control variceal bleeding, and adverse events are needed. Unless such trials are conducted and the results become published, we cannot make any conclusions regarding the benefits or harms of the two interventions.

Band ligation versus sham or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children and adolescents with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis.

Band ligation versus sham or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children and adolescents with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis.

Massive hemorrhage caused by total gastrointestinal varices and recurrent heterotopic varices due to portal vein tumor: A case report

Massive hemorrhage caused by total gastrointestinal varices and recurrent heterotopic varices due to portal vein tumor: A case report

Progress in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of hepatic vascular diseases

The liver has a very special dual blood supply, including the portal vein (65%~75%) and hepatic artery (25%~35%). The hepatic veins returns blood to the systemic circulation via the portal vein, and hepatic artery after hepatic sinusoidal confluence. The lesions on the hepatic vein and its branches can cause ischemia and hypoxia or obstruction of the drainage system, portal hypertension, upper gastrointestinal variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, and so on. Clinically, hepatic vascular diseases are relatively rare, so the diagnosis and treatment are relatively difficult. Herein, we review the diseases related to the hepatic vascular system.

Band ligation versus sclerotherapy for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis.

Portal hypertension commonly accompanies advanced liver disease and often gives rise to life-threatening complications, including haemorrhage from oesophageal and gastrointestinal varices. Variceal haemorrhage commonly occurs in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein obstruction. Prevention is therefore important. In adults, numerous randomised clinical trials have demonstrated benefits of non-selective beta-blockers and endoscopic variceal ligation as primary prevention in decreasing the risk of variceal haemorrhage. In children, band ligation, beta-blockers, and sclerotherapy have been proposed as alternatives for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding. However, primary prophylaxis is not the current standard of care in children because it is unknown whether those treatments are of benefit or cause harm when used for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children and adolescents. To determine the benefits and harms of band ligation versus sclerotherapy for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children and adolescents with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and Science Citation Index Expanded (27 April 2020). We scrutinised the reference lists of retrieved publications, and performed a manual search from the main paediatric gastroenterology and hepatology conferences (NASPGHAN and ESPGHAN) abstract books from 2008 to 2019. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, EMA, and WHO for ongoing clinical trials. There were no language or document type restrictions. We planned to include randomised clinical trials irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status for assessment of benefits and harms. If the search for randomised clinical trials retrieved quasi-randomised and observational studies, then we read them through to extract information on harms. We planned to summarise data from randomised clinical trials by standard Cochrane methodologies. We planned to assess risk of bias and use GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence per outcome. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events and liver-related morbidity, and quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were oesophageal variceal bleeding and adverse events not considered serious. We planned to analyse data with intention-to-treat. We planned to use Review Manager 5 to analyse the data. We found no randomised clinical trials assessing band ligation versus sclerotherapy for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. Randomised clinical trials assessing the benefits or harms of band ligation versus sclerotherapy for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis are lacking. Therefore, trials with adequate power and proper design, assessing the benefits and harms of band ligation versus sclerotherapy on patient-relevant clinical outcomes such as mortality, quality of life, failure to control variceal bleeding, and adverse events are needed. Unless such trials are conducted and the results become published, we cannot make any conclusions regarding the benefits or harms of these two interventions.

Colonic varices treated with embolization after pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein resection: a case report

BackgroundPancreatoduodenectomy with resection of the portal vein or superior mesenteric vein confluence has been safely performed in patients with pancreatic head cancer associated with infiltration of the portal vein or superior mesenteric vein. In recent years, left-sided portal hypertension, a late postoperative complication, has received focus owing to increased long-term survival with advances in chemotherapy. Left-sided hypertension may sometimes cause fatal gastrointestinal bleeding because of the rupture of gastrointestinal varices. Here, we present a case of colonic varices caused by left-sided portal hypertension after pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein resection.Case presentationA 69-year-old man diagnosed with pancreatic head cancer was referred to our department for surgery after undergoing chemotherapy with nine courses of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. Computed tomography showed a mass 25 mm in diameter and in contact with the portal vein. He had undergone subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein resection. Four centimeters of the portal vein had been resected, and end-to-end anastomosis was performed without splenic vein reconstruction. We had to completely resect the right colic vein, accessary right colic vein, and middle colic vein due to tumor invasion. The pathological diagnosis was ypT3, ypN1a, ypM0, and ypStageIIB, and he was administered TS-1 as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Seven months after therapeutic radical surgery, he presented with melena with progressive anemia. Computed tomography revealed transverse colonic varices. He was offered interventional radiology. Trans-splenic arterial splenic venography showed that transverse colonic varices had developed as collateral circulation of the splenic vein and inferior mesenteric vein system. An embolic substance was injected into the transverse colonic varices, which halted the progression of the anemia caused by melena. Fifteen months after therapeutic radical surgery, local recurrence of the tumor occurred; he died 28 months after the surgery.ConclusionsWhen subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein resection is performed without splenic vein reconstruction, colonic varices may result from left-sided portal hypertension. Interventional radiology is an effective treatment for gastrointestinal bleeding due to colonic varices, but it is important to be observant for colonic necrosis and new varices.