Abstract Diarrheal diseases are a major cause of infant mortality worldwide. Breastfeeding helps prevent such diseases by passive transfer of maternal antibodies against gastrointestinal pathogens previously encountered by the mother. The antibody secreting cells (ASC) that populate the lactating mammary gland (LMG) are educated in gastrointestinal lymphoid tissues, thus they express integrin a4b7. To recruit these ASC, the LMG expresses MAdCAM-1 and CCL28. Vedolizumab (vedo) blocks a combinatorial epitope on integrin a4b7, interfering with lymphocyte recruitment to the gut. Given the shared homing determinants between the gut and LMG, we investigated whether vedo might interfere with ASC trafficking to the LMG, therefore decreasing immunoglobulin (Ig) levels in breast milk. We measured Ig levels by ELISA in cryopreserved breast milk from mothers enrolled in Mommy’s Milk biorepository at the University of California, San Diego without and with Ulcerative Colitis(UC) or Crohn’s Disease(CD) and lactating mothers with UC and CD treated with vedo for more than 18 months. Milk samples were collected between 1 month and 15.45 months after childbirth. The levels of secretory IgA (SIgA) in breast milk of mothers without IBD (n=45) was not different from those of mothers with CD not on vedo (n=15) (301 ± 147 ug/mL vs. 322 ± 207 ug/mL). However, milk SIgA from mothers with UC not on vedo (n=7) were lower than non-IBD controls (213 ± 149 ug/mL vs. 301 ± 147ug/mL, p<0.01). We then compared milk SIgA from patients with CD and UC treated with vedo (CD: n= 9; 256 ± 80ug/mL, UC: n=10; 283 ± 87 ug/mL) with those from non-IBD controls (n=45; 301 ± 147ug/mL) and found no differences. Similarly, SIgA levels were not different between CD with or without vedo (256 ± 80 ug/mL vs. 322 ± 207 ug/mL) and as compared with non-IBD controls SIgA in patients with UC with vedo were unexpectedly higher than UC without vedo (283 ±87 ug/mL vs 213 ± 149 ug/mL, p<0.05). The levels of secretory IgM (SIgM) in milk were not different between mothers with UC or CD treated with vedo compared with non-IBD controls (65 ± 34 ug/mL, 69 ± 32 ug/mL, and 56 ± 37 ug/mL, respectively). Similarly, no significant difference was seen between patients with UC or CD not treated with vedo compared with the non-IBD controls (58±26 ug/mL, and 46 ± 24 ug/mL respectively). We conclude that vedo does not reduce SIgA nor SIgM levels in lactating mothers with IBD. We speculate that the higher SIgA in patients with UC treated with vedo is due to the small sample size. Vedo does not interfere with passive immunity during the lactation period, thus ASC must be able to use another integrin to arrest on microvessels of the LMG during the final stages of pregnancy.