Gastric Tube Reconstruction Research Articles

Gastro-tracheal fistula following esophageal cancer surgery through the retrosternal route: a case report

BackgroundGastro-tracheal fistula is a rare but serious complication after esophageal surgery, often requiring long-term treatment and invasive procedures. Gastro-tracheal fistula usually occurs through the posterior mediastinal route and rarely through the retrosternal route. No previous reports have described gastro-tracheal fistula after retrosternal route reconstruction was cured by conservative treatment.Case presentationA 70-year-old man with lower thoracic esophageal cancer underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position and gastric tube reconstruction through the retrosternal route with neck anastomosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Despite anastomotic leakage on postoperative day 10, his general condition was stable, and he was managed conservatively with antibiotics and gastric tube decompression. On day 29, he presented with high fever and a gastro-tracheal fistula was observed by esophagography. Conservative management was continued because the patient remained stable. On day 48, esophagography showed that the fistula was undetectable. The patient was able to take fluids orally. He progressed well on an oral diet and was transferred to a different hospital.ConclusionsA gastro-tracheal fistula, although rare, can occur after retrosternal route reconstruction. When a patient is stable, gastro-tracheal fistula after retrosternal route reconstruction may be cured by conservative treatment.

Evaluation of esophagogastric anastomosis with additional mechanical anti-reflux barrier after proximal gastrectomy

The application of proximal gastrectomy for suitable upper gastric cancer and AEG patients is increasing along with the promotion of the concept and technology for function-preserving partial gastrectomy. The following problems such as postoperative reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stenosis naturally become the focus of academic field. Based on the understanding of the anti-reflux structure and function of the esophagogastric junction, scholars have successfully established some representative esophagogastric anastomosis methods with additional mechanical anti-reflux barrier, including gastric tube reconstruction, side overlap esophagogastrostomy, and double flap technique. Subsequently, a series of improved esophagogastric reconstruction methods have been derived. At present, the recognized ideal reconstruction method has not yet been established, and there are also misunderstandings in related concepts and cognition. Based on the literatures and the authors' own practical experience, this paper draws on the research results in the field of surgical treatment for reflux esophagitis, and discusses the theoretical basis, key details and anti-reflux effect of the above-mentioned digestive tract reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy, as well as the possible problems in the exploration of innovative surgical methods at home and abroad.

Risk Reduction of Severe Anastomotic Leakage by Evaluation of Blood Perfusion Using Indocyanine Green After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Followed by Narrow Gastric Tube Reconstruction

Risk Reduction of Severe Anastomotic Leakage by Evaluation of Blood Perfusion Using Indocyanine Green After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Followed by Narrow Gastric Tube Reconstruction

Peak expiratory flow predicts the occurrence of postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Expiratory flow is an important factor in the achievement of airway clearance that is required to prevent postoperative pneumonia (POP). Although peak expiratory flow (PEF) has been shown to predict the occurrence of POP in lung cancer patients after lobectomy, its predictive power in relation to esophagectomy for esophageal cancer remains unknown. This study assesses PEF as a predictor of POP in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radical esophagectomy. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent radical esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction at our institution between January 2007 and December 2022. Preoperative pulmonary functions, including PEF, were assessed before surgery. Additionally, POP was diagnosed as a Clavien-Dindo classification of Grade II or higher. Survival and pneumonia incidence were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between these variables and POP. The study included 513 patients, of which 441 were men. POP occurred in 86 patients (16.7%). When all patients were stratified by %PEF into two groups, the group with %PEF lower that 80% had significantly poorer prognosis and higher incidence of pneumonia. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that %PEF (OR: 0.986, 95%CI: 0.974-0.999, P = 0.030), along with age, BMI, preoperative treatment, and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy were independent protective factors against POP. These results reveal that %PEF predicts the development of POP following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Pancreatoduodenectomy after Ivor-Lewis Santi oesophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. An European multicentre experience

BackgroundPancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard surgery to treat tumors and other conditions affecting the head of the pancreas. PD involves the division of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) and its branches, to allow for complete dissection of lymph nodes. However, PD in patients with prior esophageal resection presents challenges due to altered anatomy and risks compromising gastric tube vascularization. GDA preservation becomes crucial to avoid ischemia, although this may pose oncological risks by potentially leaving behind regional lymph nodes. This article reviews European surgical center experiences and techniques for PD in patients with prior esophageal surgery, focusing on short-term outcomes. MethodsWe have collected all the experiences carried out in European surgical centers and evaluated the techniques applied for PD in patients who had prior esophageal surgery while analyzing short-term outcomes. ResultsEight patients from 5 European centers were identified. Six patients were diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, including one borderline case. Intraoperatively, the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) was preserved in all cases, with portal vein reconstruction required in only one instance due to tumor invasion. No ischemia or venous congestion of the gastric tube was observed during the surgical procedure. Post-operative complications that occurred included POPF type C in 1 (12.5 %), PPH type C in 1 (12.5 %). The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 21 [14–24]. with a median of 1.5 positive lymph nodes. R1 resection was present in 62.5 % of cases. ConclusionPerforming pancreaticoduodenectomy subsequent to Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is a technical challenge, but seems feasiable and safe in selected patients. GDA-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy emerges as a valuable and time-efficient variation of the conventional procedure, it can be considered oncologically appropriate, but studies confirming its long-term impact on radicality are still needed.

A case of refractory chylothorax due to an unenclosed esophageal hiatus after subtotal esophagectomy treated with lipiodol lymphangiography

BackgroundChylothorax, a rare but serious complication following esophagectomy, can lead to dehydration, malnutrition, and even mortality. Surgical intervention is considered when conservative treatment is ineffective; however, in some refractory cases, the cause of chylothorax remains unclear. We report a case of refractory chylothorax caused by abdominal chyle leakage into the pleural space via an unenclosed esophageal hiatus.Case presentationA 66-year-old man was diagnosed with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The patient underwent robot-assisted thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy in the prone position with retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The thoracic duct was ligated and resected because of tumor invasion. Chylothorax and chylous ascites were observed 2 weeks after surgery but did not improve despite conservative management with medications and drainage. Lymphoscintigraphy through the inguinal lymph node showed tracer accumulation in the fluid in both the abdominal and pleural spaces. Lipiodol lymphangiography revealed abdominal lymphoid leakage, but no leakage was detected from the thoracic duct or mediastinum. We considered that the chylothorax was caused by chylous ascites flowing into the pleural space via an unenclosed esophageal hiatus, and we performed surgical intervention. Laparotomy revealed abdominal chyle leakage and a fistula at the esophageal hiatus with the inflow of ascites into the thoracic cavity. Lipiodol lymphangiography was additionally performed for treating abdominal lymphorrhea after surgery, and resulted in the improvement of the chylothorax and ascites. The patient was discharged with no recurrence of chylothorax or chylous ascites.ConclusionsRefractory chylothorax can occur due to chylous ascites flowing into the pleural space via an unenclosed esophageal hiatus. When the site of chylothorax leakage is unclear, the possibility of inflowing chylous ascites via the unenclosed esophageal hiatus should be explored. Esophageal hiatus closure and lipiodol lymphangiography could be effective in treating refractory chylothorax of unknown cause after esophagectomy.

Right Parasternal Approach for Aortic Valve Replacement After Presternal Gastropexy.

Due to bicuspid aortic valve aortic stenosis, a 78-year-old man with a history of esophagectomy and presternal gastric tube reconstruction required aortic valve replacement (AVR). AVR with a bioprosthetic valve was performed through a right parasternal thoracotomy. Despite the unfavorable conditions for conventional median sternotomy, AVR was successfully performed through an alternate approach. The right parasternal approach was excellent for AVR in patients with presternal gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer (EC).

300. SURFACE MICRODIALYSIS MEASURES LOCAL TISSUE METABOLISM AFTER IVOR LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY; AN ATTEMPT TO PREDICT ANASTOMOTIC DEFECT

Abstract Introduction Anastomotic defect after esophagectomy can lead to severe complications with need for surgical or endoscopic intervention. Early detection enables early treatment and can limit the consequences of the anastomotic defect. As of today, there are limited methods to predict anastomotic defect. In this study we have used microdialysis to measure local metabolism at the intrathoracic anastomosis. Feasibility and possible diagnostic use were investigated. Methods Sixty patients planned for Ivor Lewis esophagectomy were enrolled. After construction of the anastomosis, surface microdialysis probes were attached to the outer surface of the esophageal remnant and the gastric conduit in close vicinity of the anastomosis and left in place for seven postoperative days. Continuous sampling of local tissue concentrations of metabolic substances (glucose, lactate, pyruvate) was performed postoperatively. Outcome, defined as anastomotic defect or not according to ECCG (Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group) definitions, was recorded at discharge or at first postoperative follow up. Difference in concentrations of metabolic substances were analysed retrospectively between the two groups by means of artificial neural network technique. Results Surface micodialysis probes can be attached and removed from the gastric tube reconstruction without any adverse events. Deviating metabolite concentrations on POD 1 were associated with later development of anastomotic defect. In subjects who developed anastomotic defects, no difference in metabolic concentrations between the esophageal and the gastric probe was recorded. The technical failure rate of the microdialysis probes/procedure was high. Discussion Surface microdialysis can be used in a clinical setting after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Deviation in local tissue metabolism on POD 1 seems to be associated with development of anastomotic defects. Further development of microdialysis probes and procedure is required to reduce technical failure.

815. FREE JEJUNAL GRAFT (FJG) FOR COMPLEX RECONSTRUCTION AFTER PHARINGO-LARINGO-ESOPHAGECTOMY

Abstract Background Pharyngo-esophageal reconstruction using free jejunal grafts has been widely used for the treatment of locally advanced carcinomas of the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus. However, the procedure is technically demanding and requires complex recontractions. The aim of this study was to evaluate our institutional outcomes of reconstruction using a free jejunal graft with vascular reconstruction in patients undergoing pharyngo laryngo esophagectomy with a multidisciplinary surgical team. Material and methods Unicentric retrospective case series between 2014-2023 with 6 patients that require complex reconstruction with free jejunal graft. Information was obtained from institutional database. Quantitative variables are expressed with median and interquartile range (IQR), and qualitative variables with percentage and absolute number. Results In our sample, all patients were male with median age of 62 (7) years old and had previous history of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with radical Qt/Rt with maximum radiotherapy dose who developed local recurrence at hypopharynx involving the cervical esophagus. Patients demographics and characteristics are shown in table 1. FJG was the primary procedure in five cases after PLPE, of which three were done as curative procedure and the rest as a palliative procedure. In one patients FJG was considered after gastric tube reconstruction with transhiatal esophagectomy. JFG vessels were commonly anastomosed to the common superior thyroid artery (42,9%) and the external jugular vein (21%) and thyroid vein (21,2%). Operative time was 440 (359) minutes. After FJG procedure time to oral intake reintroduction was 7 (6-20) days and hospital stay length was 20,5 (16) days. Pneumonia was the most frequent complication in four patients (57,2%). Leakage rate after FJG was 33% (2). Three patients required reintervention, (1) mesenteric graft bleeding, (1) graft anastomoses dehiscence and (1) graft necrosis. FJG failure rate was 33%, one due complete graft ischemia secondary to arterial thrombosis at 2nd POD and other due to failed conversative management of dehiscence of both anastomoses with partial ischemia. After failed FJG only one patient underwent reconstruction by transhiatal esophagectomy and gastric tube replacement. Two patients were readmitted before 30 days and two patients before 12 months after discharge. BMI after JFG was 22.7 (13,1) kg/m2. According to late complication, dysphagia was the most common complication (42,7%) also one patient cannot feed orally due to severe stenosis after chronic fistula. In-patient mortality was 0%. Overall survival was 19 (37) months. One patient with FJG failure died due to septic complications after pharingostoma, and one patient due to disease progression. Conclusion Free jejunal graft with vessel reconstruction for patients undergoing pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy is a safe procedure but with high complications rate which enhance the priority of centralize this pathology in high volume centers.

510. INNOVATIVE ROBOTIC-ASSISTED ESOPHAGECTOMY WITH THREE-FIELD LYMPHADENECTOMY: A NOVEL APPROACH TO ESOPHAGEAL CANCER SURGERY

Abstract Background Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the predominant form of esophageal cancer in Thailand, often presents at advanced stages (III - IV), necessitating surgical intervention. Radical esophagectomy, including three-field lymphadenectomy, stands as one of the most invasive gastrointestinal surgeries. However, in the era of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), robotic systems have emerged as a formidable approach to achieve radical treatment goals while minimizing surgical invasiveness. This video showcases a novel surgical technique and its challenges. Methods A case of mid-thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, clinically staged III, treated via robotic-assisted esophagectomy and three-field lymphadenectomy using the Da Vinci Xi system. The operation encompassed three phases: Initially, the thoracic phase with patient in semi-prone position with three robotic and one assistant trocars for complete esophageal mobilization and mediastinal lymph node retrieval. The abdominal phase, followed by the cervical phase, utilized four robotic trocars and one assistant trocar in supine position with hyperextended neck, facilitating perigastric lymph node retrieval, gastric tube reconstruction via the posterior mediastinal route, and cervical esophago-gastric tube anastomosis using a circular stapler. Results The patient experienced an uneventful recovery. Postoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy on day 1 revealed the integrity of the anastomosis and normal vocal cord function. Imaging conducted on day 7 confirmed that the anastomosis was patent without any leakage. Surgical outcomes included an operative time of 615 minutes, estimated blood loss of 150 ml, a 14-day hospital stay, and recovery without complications. This video highlights the intricacies of the procedure and the robotic system's ability to access anatomically challenging spaces, thereby minimizing surgical invasiveness and enhancing recovery. Conclusion The robotic system is capable of performing radical procedures in anatomically challenging areas, such as narrow spaces and areas requiring precise maneuverability among vital structures. It enables a comprehensive approach spanning from the upper to the lower thoracic regions and diversity of surgery in thoracic and abdominal cavity. Additionally, this presentation highlights unique surgical tips and techniques that enhance the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted esophagectomy. By significantly reducing surgical errors and optimizing outcomes for both oncologic and minimally invasive surgeries, it thereby marks a significant leap forward in the field of esophageal surgery. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vrmu2D8TGoetnplcREPWQocXJle4PrOX/view?usp=share_link

539. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN WAITING PERIOD FOR RADICAL SURGERY AND POSTOPERATIVE RELAPSE IN CLINICAL STAGE I ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

Abstract Background Esophagectomy with locolegional lymphanedectomy based on potential lymph node metastatic risk is the current standard treatment for clinical Stage I thoracic esophageal cancer. Local excision by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard treatment for clinical Stage 0, however surgery is considered as an additional treatment for pathological T1b cases due to potential metastatic risk. Cases of additional resection after ESD are those pathologically demonstrated to have a high risk of metastasis based on tumor depth and vascular invasion, etc. Compared to cases of surgery for clinical Stage I, many of these cases have a high risk of metastasis, and therefore a poor prognosis is generally expected. Addionally, the prolonged waiting time between initial diagnosis and radical surgery due to ESD may be a factor in poor prognosis, but there is currently no consensus on the risk. Therefore, we conducted a study to clarify the effect of waiting period before surgery (WP) on the risk of recurrence in clinical Stage I esophageal cancer surgery. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the association between WP and 3-year postoperative recurrence-free survival (3y-RFS) in 65 patients who underwent primary esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for clinical Stage I esophageal cancer and 22 patients who underwent additional resection after ESD at our hospital. Results The WP of 87 patients was 2.12 ± 1.43 months (mean± SD), and 13 patients had postoperative recurrence (3y-RFS 85.1%). A 2-arm comparison of short or long WP with a cutoff value of 2.83 months (mean+0.5 SD) showed no clear association with 3y-RFS (100% vs 81.4%, p=0.071). A strong correlation was shown between WP and ESD (r=0.647, p<0.01). WP was 1.69±1.20 months (mean± SD) in 65 patients who underwent surgery as initial treatment, and 12 patients had postoperative recurrence (3y-RFS 81.5%). A 2-arm comparison of short or long WP with a cutoff value of 2.29 months (mean+0.5 SD) suggested an association with 3y-RFS (85.7% vs 55.6%, p=0.018). Conclusion Although this is a single-center, retrospective study of a small number of cases and only a univariate study due to the small number of events, it suggests that a longer waiting period before surgery may be a risk factor for postoperative recurrence.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy after postoperative gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer with median arcuate ligament syndrome: a case report

BackgroundPancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is considered a challenging surgery for resecting the gastroduodenal artery (GDA), right gastric artery (RGA), and lymph node tumors. In cases of pancreatic head cancer surgery, vascular anastomosis or right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA)/GDA preservation is necessary after postoperative gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer. Therefore, we report for the first time an extremely rare case of PD in a patient with pancreatic head cancer and median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) after gastric tube reconstruction following esophageal cancer surgery, in which the entire pancreatic head arcade was preserved.Case presentationThe patient was a 76-year-old man who had undergone esophageal cancer surgery after sternal gastric tube reconstruction 7 years ago. He was referred to our hospital because of the suspicion of intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC) owing to an enlarged cystic lesion and a substantial component in the uncinate process of the pancreas. Preoperative three-dimensional computed (3D-CT) tomography angiography showed celiac axis stenosis and pancreatic head arcade dilation. The diagnosis was IPMC without evidence of invasion; therefore, gastric tube blood flow was maintained by preserving the GDA and RGEA. Due to MALS, the GDA blood flow was supplied through the pancreatic head arcade, necessitating its preservation. The GDA-RGEA, right gastroepiploic vein, and anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal artery were taped over the entire pancreatic head for preservation. The inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA) was also taped on the dorsal pancreas and the posterior or anterior IPDA, which further bifurcates were taped to preserve them. Subsequently, PD was performed.ConclusionWe report a case of PD after gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer with MALS, in which the pancreatic head arcade vessels were successfully preserved using 3D-CT to confirm the operation of the vessels.

Evaluation of the blood flow in reconstructed gastric tube and its relation to anastomosis leakage

ObjectivesAnastomotic leakage in esophageal cancer surgery may be reduced by evaluating the blood flow to the reconstructed organ, but quantitative evaluation of arterial and venous blood flow is difficult. This study aimed to quantitatively assess blood flow using a new technique, as well as determine the relationship between the blood flow in the gastric tube and anastomotic leakage using near-infrared spectroscopy.MethodsThis single-center, observational study included 50 patients aged 51–82 years who underwent radical esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer between June 2022 and January 2023. Regional tissue oxygen saturation was measured at the antrum (point X), the anastomotic point (point Z), and the midpoint between points X and Z (point Y) before and after gastric tube formation. These three points of oxygen saturation were investigated in relation to anastomotic leakage.ResultsWhen comparing the presence of leakage to its absence, regional tissue oxygen saturation at points X and Z after gastric tube formation was significantly lower (X: p = 0.03, Z: p = 0.02), with the decreasing rate significantly higher at point Z (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the decreasing rate of regional tissue oxygen saturation between points X and Y (X: p = 0.052, Y: p = 0.83).ConclusionRegional tissue oxygen saturation levels may be useful for measuring blood flow and could be a predictor of anastomotic leakage.

Nationwide Association of Surgical Performance of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy With Patient Outcomes

Suboptimal surgical performance is hypothesized to be associated with less favorable patient outcomes in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Establishing this association may lead to programs that promote better surgical performance of MIE and improve patient outcomes. To investigate associations between surgical performance and postoperative outcomes after MIE. In this nationwide cohort study of 15 Dutch hospitals that perform more than 20 MIEs per year, 7 masked expert MIE surgeons assessed surgical performance using videos and a previously developed and validated competency assessment tool (CAT). Each hospital submitted 2 representative videos of MIEs performed between November 4, 2021, and September 13, 2022. Patients registered in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, were included to examine patient outcomes. Hospitals were divided into quartiles based on their MIE-CAT performance score. Outcomes were compared between highest (top 25%) and lowest (bottom 25%) performing quartiles. Transthoracic MIE with gastric tube reconstruction. The primary outcome was severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) within 30 days after surgery. Multilevel logistic regression, with clustering of patients within hospitals, was used to analyze associations between performance and outcomes. In total, 30 videos and 970 patients (mean [SD] age, 66.6 [9.1] years; 719 men [74.1%]) were included. The mean (SD) MIE-CAT score was 113.6 (5.5) in the highest performance quartile vs 94.1 (5.9) in the lowest. Severe postoperative complications occurred in 18.7% (41 of 219) of patients in the highest performance quartile vs 39.2% (40 of 102) in the lowest (risk ratio [RR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24-0.99). The highest vs the lowest performance quartile showed lower rates of conversions (1.8% vs 8.9%; RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.21-0.21), intraoperative complications (2.7% vs 7.8%; RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.04-0.94), and overall postoperative complications (46.1% vs 65.7%; RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.24-0.96). The R0 resection rate (96.8% vs 94.2%; RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.97-1.05) and lymph node yield (mean [SD], 38.9 [14.7] vs 26.2 [9.0]; RR, 3.20; 95% CI, 0.27-3.21) increased with oncologic-specific performance (eg, hiatus dissection, lymph node dissection). In addition, a high anastomotic phase score was associated with a lower anastomotic leakage rate (4.6% vs 17.7%; RR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06-0.31). These findings suggest that better surgical performance is associated with fewer perioperative complications for patients with esophageal cancer on a national level. If surgical performance of MIE can be improved with MIE-CAT implementation, substantially better patient outcomes may be achievable.

Aortoesophageal fistula due to esophageal cancer: a case report of successful management

BackgroundAortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition. The best treatment for the AEF due to esophageal carcinoma is still unresolved. Here, we report a rare case of AEF caused by esophageal cancer, that was successfully treated with emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), followed by esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction.Case presentationA 64-year-old man presented with loss of consciousness and hypotension during chemoradiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. Enhanced computed tomography showed extravasation from the descending aorta into the esophagus at the tumor site. We performed emergency TEVAR for the AEF, which stabilized the hemodynamics. We then performed thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy on day 4 after TEVAR to prevent graft infection, followed by gastric tube reconstruction on day 30 after TEVAR. At 9 months after the onset of AEF, the patient continues to receive outpatient chemotherapy and leads a normal daily life.ConclusionTEVAR is a useful hemostatic procedure for AEF. If the patient is in good condition and can continue treatment for esophageal cancer, esophagectomy and reconstruction after TEVAR should be performed to prevent graft infection and maintain quality of life.

Blood flow evaluation of reconstructed gastric tube in esophageal surgery using near-infrared imaging and retrospective time-intensity curve analysis.

Near-infrared fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green (ICG-NIFI) can visualize a blood flow in reconstructed gastric tube; however, it depends on surgeon's visual assessment. The aim of this study was to re-analyze the ICG-NIFI data by an evaluator independent from the surgeon and feasibility of creating the time-intensity curve (TIC). We retrospectively reviewed 97 patients who underwent esophageal surgery with gastric tube reconstruction between January 2017 and November 2022. From the stored ICG videos, fluorescence intensity was examined in the four regions of interest (ROIs), which was set around the planned anastomosis site on the elevated gastric tube. After creation the TICs using the OpenCV library, we measured the intensity starting point and time constant and assessed the correlation between the anastomotic leakage. Postoperative leakage occurred for 12 patients. The leakage group had significantly lack of blood flow continuity between the right and left gastroepiploic arteries (75.0% vs. 22.4%; P < 0.001) and tended to have slower ICG visualization time assessed by the surgeon's eyes (40 vs. 32s; P = 0.066). TIC could create in 65 cases. Intensity starting point at all ROIs was faster than the surgeon's assessment. The leakage group tended to have slower intensity starting point at ROI 3 compared to those in the non-leakage group (22.5 vs. 19.0s; P = 0.087). A TIC analysis of ICG-NIFI by an independent evaluator was able to quantify the fluorescence intensity changes that the surgeon had visually determined.

Quality control of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy

With the increasing incidence of esophagogastric junction carcinoma, the application rate of proximal gastrectomy has been rising annually. There is a wide variety of methods for digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, and some of these reconstruction methods have been introduced relatively recently, with limited clinical experience, which led to a lack of standardization. Such a situation will inevitably result in inconsistent clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy with digestive tract reconstruction. To promote the standardization of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, improve the clinical efficacy of proximal gastrectomy, and reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, this article elaborates on the indications, surgical steps and technical points of the four methods after proximal gastrectomy recommended by the "Chinese consensus on digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy (2020 edition)", such as double tract, side overlap, double flaps and gastric tube reconstruction, providing guidance for the application of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy.

Successful management of an atrio-esophageal fistula after atrial fibrillation ablation: a case report.

Atrio-esophageal fistula is a rare but still a catastrophic complication of radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. We report a successful case of atrio-esophageal fistula with right posterolateral thoracotomy and right femoral cannulation of cardiopulmonary bypass. A 67-year-old man underwent radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. Nineteen days later, he developed cerebral infarction, and computed tomography showed air in the left atrium. He was transferred to our hospital for surgery. The upper body was placed in the left lateral decubitus position, and the lower body was placed in the left hemilateral decubitus position. The surgical approach was a right posterolateral thoracotomy in the 5th intercostal space. At first, the esophagus was transected at the diaphragm and tracheal carina levels. Then, an arterial line was inserted into the right common femoral artery and venous line into the right common femoral vein. Three U-shaped sutures of 3-0 polypropylene were placed to stop bleeding from the atrium. The esophagus was removed while snaring the 3-0 polypropylene sutures. There were two holes in the esophagus. Four drains were placed to clean the repaired site. After chest closure, the patient was placed supine. Cervical esophagostomy and enterostomy were performed. Gastric tube reconstruction via the retrosternal route was performed on postoperative day 28, and the patient was transferred to another hospital for rehabilitation on postoperative day 99. It is important to thoroughly discuss with esophageal surgeon how to reach the heart and esophagus, and how to reconstruct the esophagus later.

Randomized controlled trial of nasogastric tube use after esophagectomy: study protocol for the kinetic trial.

Esophagectomy is a complex and complication laden procedure. Despite centralization, variations in perioparative strategies reflect a paucity of evidence regarding optimal routines. The use of nasogastric (NG) tubes post esophagectomy is typically associated with significant discomfort for the patients. We hypothesize that immediate postoperative removal of the NG tube is non-inferior to current routines. All Nordic Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer centers were invited to participate in this open-label pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT). Inclusion criteria include resection for locally advanced esophageal cancer with gastric tube reconstruction. A pretrial survey was undertaken and was the foundation for a consensus process resulting in the Kinetic trial, an RCT allocating patients to either no use of a NG tube (intervention) or 5days of postoperative NG tube use (control) with anastomotic leakage as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include pulmonary complications, overall complications, length of stay, health related quality of life. A sample size of 450 patients is planned (Kinetic trial: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39935085). Thirteen Nordic centers with a combined catchment area of 17 million inhabitants have entered the trial and ethical approval was granted in Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark. All centers routinely use NG tube and all but one center use total or hybrid minimally invasive-surgical approach. Inclusion began in January 2022 and the first annual safety board assessment has deemed the trial safe and recommended continuation. We have launched the first adequately powered multi-center pragmatic controlled randomized clinical trial regarding NG tube use after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction.

Comparison of quality-of-life after proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction versus gastric tube reconstruction in patients with proximal gastric cancer

Objective: To compare the surgical safety and postoperative quality of life between proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction (PG-DT) and proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction (PG-GT) for proximal gastric cancer. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of clinical and follow-up data of 99 patients with proximal gastric cancer who had undergone double tract or gastric tube surgery in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2016 to September 2021. We allocated them to two groups according to surgical procedure, namely a double tract group (PG-DT, 50 patients) and gastric tube group (PG-GT, 49 patients). Proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction entails constructing a Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy after severing the proximal stomach, and then constructing a side-to-side anastomosis between the residual stomach and the jejunum to establish an anti-reflux barrier and thus minimize postoperative gastroesophageal reflux. Proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction entails severing the proximal gastric stomach, constructing a tubular shaped gastric remnant, and then using a linear stapler to directly anastomose the posterior wall of the esophagus to the anterior wall of the resultant gastric tube. The primary end point was the quality of life of the two groups 1 year postoperatively (post-gastrectomy syndrome assessment scale: the higher the scores for change in body mass, food intake per meal, meal quality subscale, total physical health measurement, and total mental health measurement, the better the quality-of-life, and the higher the scores for other indicators, the worse the quality-of-life). The secondary end points were intraoperative and postoperative status, changes in nutritional status 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and long-term postoperative complications (gastroesophageal reflux, anastomotic stenosis, intestinal obstruction, and gastric emptying disorder 1 year postoperatively). Results: In the PG-DT group, there were 35 (70%) men and 15 (30%) women, 33 (66.0%) patients were aged <65 years, and 37 (74.0%) of them had a body mass index of 18-25 kg/m2; whereas in the PG-GT group, there were 41 (83.7%) men and eight (16.3%) women, 21 (42.9%) patients aged <65 years, and 34 (69.4%) patients with a body mass index of 18-25 kg/m2. There were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups except for age (P=0.021). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissected, length of hospital stay, and incidence of perioperative complications between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with the PG-GT group, the incidence and severity of postoperative reflux esophagitis were significantly lower in the PG-DT group (4.0% [2/50] vs. 26.5% [13/49], χ2=13.507, P=0.009). The incidences of postoperative anastomotic stenosis, intestinal obstruction, and gastric retention did not differ significantly between the two groups (all P>0.05). Patients in the PG-DT group had better quality-of-life scores for esophageal reflux (2.8 [2.3,4.0] vs. 4.8 [3.8,5.0], Z=3.489, P<0.001), eating discomfort (2.7 [1.7,3.0] vs. 3.3 [2.7,4.0 ], Z=3.393, P=0.001), and total symptoms (2.3 [1.7,2.7] vs. 2.5 [2.2,2.9], Z=2.243, P=0.025) than those in the gastric tube group; The scores for postoperative symptoms (2.0 [1.0,3.0] vs. 2.0 [2.0, 3.0], Z=2.127, P=0.033), meals consumed (2.0 [1.0, 2.0] vs. 2.0 [2.0, 3.0], Z=3.976, P<0.001), work (1.0 [1.0, 2.0] vs. 2.0 [1.0, 2.0], Z=2.279, P=0.023] and daily life (1.7 [1.3, 2.0] vs. 2.0 [2.0, 2.3], Z=3.950, P<0.001) were better in the PG-DT than the PG-GT group. Patients in the PG-GT group scored better than those in the PG-DT group for somatic symptoms, such as anal evacuation (3.0 [2.0, 4.0] vs. 3.5 [2.0, 5.0], Z=2.345, P=0.019). There were no significant differences in hemoglobin, serum albumin, serum total protein, or weight loss 1 year postoperatively between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions: The safety of double tract anastomosis for proximal gastric cancer is comparable to that of gastric tube surgery. Compared with gastric tube surgery, double tract anastomosis achieves less esophageal reflux and better quality of life, making it a preferable surgical procedure for proximal gastric cancer.