Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Research Articles

Updated results from first-in-human phase 1 dose-escalation trial of TAK-102, a GPC3-targeted armored CAR T cells, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2543 Background: Glypican 3 (GPC3) is a member of the glypican family of heparan sulfate proteoglycans that are attached to the cell surface by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor. High GPC3 expression rates are reported in numerous cancer types with a high unmet medical need, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). TAK-102 is a GPC3-targeted autologous chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) immunotherapy armored with IL-7 and CCL19. The addition of IL-7 and CCL19 to the construct was designed to support the expansion of memory subsets and persistence of CAR-T cells. We hypothesized TAK-102 would help overcome the challenges associated with an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that limit the activity of nonarmored CAR-T therapies in solid tumors. Methods: The first-in-human, Phase 1 dose escalation study evaluated TAK-102 in patients (pts) with GPC3-expressing solid tumors who were refractory or intolerant to standard treatments. TAK-102 was administered via a single infusion to 3 dose cohorts after lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC; consisting of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide): dose level (DL) 1 (starting cohort), 1x107 CAR+ cells/body; DL2, 1x108 CAR+ cells/body; DL3, 5x108 CAR+ cells/body. Objectives included evaluation of safety, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), recommended phase 2 dose, cellular kinetic (CK) parameters, tumor markers, cytokine/chemokine and antitumor activity based on RECIST 1.1. Results: Eleven pts were enrolled and infused TAK-102 (DL1: 3 pts, DL2: 3 pts, DL3: 5 pts): 1 gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma, 2 liposarcoma, 8 HCC. Five pts achieved stable disease (SD), HCC (GPC3 H-Score: 36) . In patients achieving SD, the greatest reduction in tumor size was 26.4%. No DLTs or neurotoxicity were observed. Six pts experienced cytokine release syndrome (Grade1: 5 pts, Grade2: 1 pt); all cases were manageable. AFP was measured as a tumor marker for HCC. Among 8 pts with HCC, 4 had SD after treatment with TAK-102 and 3 showed a decrease or stabilization of AFP levels corresponding to their clinical status. CK profiles for pts were assessed by flow cytometry and qPCR-based assays. Overall, there was improvement in TAK-102 exposure (Cmax, AUC) when escalating from DL1 to DL2. There was a slight decrease in Tmax from DL2 to DL3. Homeostatic cytokine (IL-7) spiked post-LDC and showed no further increase after TAK-102 infusion across all the DLs. There was dose-dependency observed in peak CCL19, IFN-γ and IL-6 levels. Conclusions: TAK-102, an armored CAR-T, is well tolerated and has a manageable safety profile with some early signs of anti-tumor activity. For CK, TAK-102 exposure (Cmax, AUC) showed improvement from DL1 to DL2, and slight decrease in Tmax from DL2 to DL3. Dose-dependency was observed in peak CCL19, IFN-γ and IL-6 levels, which may point towards increased signal of activity from DL1 to DL3. Clinical trial information: NCT04405778 .

Complete response induced by nivolumab monotherapy in gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report

Complete response induced by nivolumab monotherapy in gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (gNENs) display peculiar site-specific features among all NENs. Their incidence and prevalence have been rising in the past few decades. gNENscomprise gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas (gNECs) and gastricneuroendocrine tumours (gNETs), the latter further classified into three types. Type I anatype II gNETs are gastrin-dependent and develop in chronic atrophic gastritis and as part of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome within a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome (MEN1), respectively. Type III or sporadic gNETs develop in the absence of hypergastrinaemia and in the context of a near-normal or inflamed gastric mucosa. gNECs can also develop in the context of variable atrophic, relatively normal or inflamed gastric mucosa. Each gNEN type has different clinical characteristics and requires a different multidisciplinary approach in expert dedicated centres. Type I gNETs are managed mainly by endoscopy or surgery, whereas the treatment of typeII gNETs largely depends on the management of the concomitant MEN1. Type III gNETs may require both locoregional approaches and systemic treatments; NECs are often metastatic and therefore require systemic treatment. Specific data regarding the systemic treatment of gNENs are lacking and are derived from the treatment of intestinal NETs and NECs. An enhanced understanding of molecular and clinical pathophysiology is needed to improve the management and outcomes of patients' gNETs.

Gastric Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma With Loss of Epithelial Markers Expression.

Given that gastric small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) is notably more aggressive than conventional adenocarcinoma, and a platinum-based regimen aligned with the treatment for pulmonary SCNEC is advocated when chemotherapy is needed, ensuring an accurate pathological diagnosis is paramount. A 63-year-old man, examined for melena, underwent gastroscopy which revealed a total circumferential Borrmann type 3 lesion extending from the pylorus to the antrum of the stomach. He underwent a distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The microscopic examination revealed SCNEC with a minor adenocarcinoma component. Immunohistochemically, the SCNEC was diffusely positive for synaptophysin, CD56, and INSM1, very focally positive for chromogranin A, and negative for leukocyte common antigen, CD3, and CD20. A significant observation in this case was the complete negativity for epithelial markers including keratin (CK7, CK8, CK20, CAM5.2, and AE1/AE3) and epithelial membrane antigen. Diffuse positivity for neuroendocrine markers, negativity for other lineage markers, and a transition from the adenocarcinoma component, if present, serve as significant diagnostic clues for gastric SCNEC with loss of epithelial markers expression. SCNEC should not be excluded solely based on the negative result for epithelial markers.

Claudin 18.2 expression in digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: a clinicopathological study.

Claudin 18.2-targeted therapy has shown significant efficacy in treating claudin 18.2-positive cancers. However, limited systematic studies have investigated characteristics of claudin 18.2 expression in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Data and specimens from 403 cases of digestive NENs were retrospectively collected, and claudin 18.2 expression was detected using immunochemical staining. Claudin 18.2 was positive in 19.6% (79/403) of the digestive NENs. The highest positive rate of claudin 18.2 was observed in gastric NENs (72/259, 27.8%), accounting for 91.1% (72/79) of all positive cases. The positivity rate was significantly higher in gastric NENs compared to pancreatic (2/78, 2.6%) or colorectal NENs (2/38, 5.3%; p < 0.05). For digestive NENs, claudin 18.2 positivity was significantly higher in neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) (37/144, 25.7%) than in neuroendocrine tumours (NETs; 14/160, 8.8%; p < 0.001), but no significant difference was found between gastric NECs (59/213, 27.7%) and gastric NETs (13/46, 28.3%; p > 0.05). The positivity was significantly higher in large-cell NECs (LCNECs; 28/79, 35.4%) and MiNEN (mixed neuroendocrine-non- neuroendocrine neoplasms)-LCNECs (23/66, 34.8%) compared to small-cell NECs (SCNECs; 9/65, 13.8%) and MiNEN-SCNECs (5/33, 15.2%; p < 0.05). Claudin 18.2 expression was more prevalent in gastric NENs than in pancreatic (12.5 ×; p = 0.001) and colorectal NENs (5.9 ×; p = 0.021). Claudin 18.2 staining was a useful method for identify the gastric origins of NETs, with a sensitivity of 28.3% and a specificity of 99.1%. The expression characteristics of claudin 18.2 in NENs were characterized, which may provide a clinicopathological reference for targeted therapies in patients with NENs.

S4146 Pancreatic Incidentaloma Leading to Small Cell Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Diagnosis

S4146 Pancreatic Incidentaloma Leading to Small Cell Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Diagnosis

Equivalent Survival between Gastric Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Gastric Small-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

According to the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms, gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) can be further divided into gastric large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (GLNEC) and gastric small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (GSNEC). Whether the prognoses of the two types have a discrepancy has long been disputed. We collected patients diagnosed with GLNEC or GSNEC in the National Cancer Center of China between January 2000 and December 2020. The characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. We further verified our conclusion using the SEER dataset. A total of 114 GNEC patients, including 82 patients with GLNEC and 32 patients with GSNEC, have completed treatment in our hospital. Clinicopathologic differences were not observed between patients with GSNEC and GLNEC concerning the sex, age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tumor location, tumor size, stage, treatment received, the expression of neuroendocrine markers (CD56, Chromogranin A, synaptophysin), and score on the Ki-67 index. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates of GLNEC and GSNEC were 89.0%, 60.5%, and 52.4%, and 93.8%, 56.3%, and 52.7%, which showed no statistically significant differences. This result was confirmed further by using the SEER dataset after the inverse probability of treatment weighting. Although with different cell morphology, the comparison of prognosis between the GLNEC and GSNEC has no significant statistical difference.

Evaluation of the safety and immunological effects of Bacillus Calmette–Guérin in combination with checkpoint inhibitor therapy in a patient with neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized therapy of advanced and metastatic cancers. However, a significant proportion of patients do not respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors or develop resistance. Therefore, novel therapies or combinations of therapies that may act synergistically are needed. It has been suggested that induction of trained immunity may increase the response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, through reprogramming myeloid cells toward an antitumor phenotype. On the other hand, activation of the immune system also carries the risk of potentially sustaining tumorgenicity and increasing immune- related toxicity.Case presentationWe report the case of a 37-year-old Dutch male suffering from gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma with liver metastases and high risk for an unfavorable outcome, who was treated with a combination of programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor nivolumab and the trained immunity-inducer Bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccine as a salvage therapy. Three doses of BCG vaccine were administered at 3-month intervals, in conjunction with the immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen. At a certain point, radiation therapy was added to the treatment regimen. During the combination of these therapies, the patient developed immune-mediated colitis, which necessitated discontinuation of all treatments. Bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccination induced a trained immune response with elevated monocyte-derived interleukin-6 and interleukin-1β production capacity. From the first vaccination with Bacillus Calmette–Guérin until 3 months after the last vaccination with Bacillus Calmette–Guérin, the patient displayed only mild progression of the primary tumor and no progression of the metastases.ConclusionIn this study, we show the feasibility to combine checkpoint inhibitor therapy with inducers of trained immunity in a patient with an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor. Autoimmune side effects are common under programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor therapy, which was considered the most likely cause of colitis, although an additive effect of Bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccination or radiotherapy cannot be excluded. The patient displayed only mild progression during the combination therapy, but larger studies are warranted to fully explore the potential benefit of trained immunity inducers as an adjuvant to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Endoscopic features of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma.

The endoscopic features of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (G-NEC) have not been clarified; therefore, they were investigated in relation to clinicopathological findings. Consecutive patients with G-NECs who had undergone endoscopic or surgical resection at our institution between January 2005 and March 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The endoscopic and clinicopathological findings of the lesions were analyzed to provide information of diagnostic value. In addition, cases of gastric neuroendocrine tumor (G-NET) and common-type gastric adenocarcinoma treated in the same study period were identified to compare the endoscopic findings between each G-NEC versus G-NET, and G-NEC versus common-type gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients with common-type gastric adenocarcinoma were matched for age, sex, tumor size, and depth of tumor invasion in 1:3 ratio. Among 15 patients with 15 G-NECs, submucosal tumor-like marginal elevation (87%), adherent white coat (67%), and ulceration with a distinct border (60%) were characteristic endoscopic findings in white-light images. Magnifying narrow-band imaging endoscopy revealed an absent microsurface (MS) pattern plus disrupted irregular microvessel (MV) in five (71%) of seven cases with evaluable MS and MV patterns. The area with an absent MS pattern plus disrupted irregular MV corresponded to the histological finding of NEC component in all five cases. These endoscopic features were all significantly more frequent in G-NECs than G-NETs (n=22) or common-type gastric adenocarcinomas (n=45). These endoscopic features should be taken into consideration to increase the index of suspicion and to improve the accuracy of target biopsies for G-NEC.

Value of a preoperative prognostic nutritional index for the prognostic evaluation of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma patients.

To study the value of Onodera's prognostic nutrition index (PNI) in patients with gastric neuroendocrine cancer (G-NEC). The clinical data on 148 cases of G-NEC presented between March 2010 and April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The relationship between the clinical characteristics of the patients and PNI was analyzed. Optimal PNI cutoff values for G-NEC prognosis prediction were calculated using the X-tile software. The survival curves were created using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was also established to identify independent prognostic factors that impact the prognosis of patients with G-NEC. The median overall survival (OS) rate was 30 months (range 6-127 months), and the OS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 89.2, 71.6 and 68.2%, respectively. The mean PNI of the 148 patients before the operation was 49.5 ± 8.0. The mean PNI of patients with anemia (p < 0.001) and abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen (p = 0.039) was significantly lower than that of patients without such comorbidities. The mean PNI of patients with Stage III tumors (p < 0.001) and postoperative complications was significantly lower (p = 0.005). PNI optimal cutoff values were 50 (p < 0.001). Based on the cut-off value of the PNI, these patients were divided into a PNI-high group (PNI ≥ 50.0, n = 77) and a PNI-low group (PNI < 50.0, n = 71). The PNI-high group had a significantly better 5-years OS rate compared with the PNI-low group (76.6% vs. 59.2%, χ2 = 14.7, p < 0. 001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PNI and pathological stage were independent prognostic factors for patients with G-NEC. In the subgroup analysis, OS rates were significantly lower in the PNI-low group than in the PNI-high group among patients with stage I and stage III of the disease. The PNI is a simple and useful marker for predicting long-term outcomes in G-NEC patients regardless of tumor stage. Based on our results, we suggest that PNI should be included in routine assessments of patients with G-NEC.

Survival Trends and Profiling of Gastric Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinoma (gMANEC) in the Current Era

Background: Gastric mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (gMANEC) is a histopathologic diagnosis with at least 30% each of exocrine and endocrine components. Although prognosis is thought to be driven by the relative exocrine or endocrine dominance, gMANEC has been clinically treated as gastric adenocarcinoma (gAC). The overall survival of gMANEC as compared to gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (gNEC) or gAC remains undefined. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, patients with gastric tumors were queried from 2004 to 2016 for gMANEC, gNEC, and gAC histologies. Demographic and clinicopathologic features were recorded. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to delineate factors associated with overall survival (OS). Results: Overall, 404 patients diagnosed with gMANEC were identified. Patients had a median age 68 years, were majority male, and predominantly Caucasian. Gastric MANEC was more frequently poorly differentiated (73%vs 52% (gAC) vs 20% (gNEC), P &lt; .001) with lymphovascular invasion (57%vs 38%vs 27%, P &lt; .001) and lymph node involvement (59%vs 49%vs 36%, P &lt; .001); these factors were associated with worse OS on univariable analysis. Finally, tumors &gt;5 cm and lymph node involvement were independent predictors of worse survival. The median OS of patients with gMANEC was 41.5 months. Conclusion: Gastric MANEC and gAC have a similarly dismal prognosis and thus should be continued to treat like gAC. Pathologic nodal metastasis, tumor size and grade are useful prognostic factors.

A novel nomogram and risk stratification system predicting the cancer-specific survival of patients with gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma: a study based on SEER database and external validation

BackgroundGastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) is a rare histology of gastric cancer. The retrospective study was designed to construct and validate a nomogram for predicting the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of postoperative GNEC patients.MethodsData for 28 patients from the Hangzhou TCM Hospital were identified as the external validation cohort. A total of 1493 patients were included in the SEER database and randomly assigned to the training group (1045 patients) and internal validation group (448 patients). The nomogram was constructed using the findings of univariate and multivariate Cox regression studies. The model was evaluated by consistency index (C-index), calibration plots, and clinical net benefit. Finally, the effect between the nomogram and AJCC staging system was compared by net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).ResultsAge, gender, grade, T stage, N stage, metastasis, primary site, tumor size, RNE, and chemotherapy were incorporated in the nomogram. The C-indexes were 0.792 and 0.782 in the training and internal verification sets. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS predicted by the nomogram and actual measurements had good agreement in calibration plots. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year NRI were 0.21, 0.29, and 0.37, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year IDI values were 0.10, 0.12, and 0.13 (P < 0.001), respectively. In 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS prediction using DCA curves, the nomogram outperformed the AJCC staging system. The nomogram performed well in both the internal and external validation cohorts.ConclusionWe developed and validated a nomogram to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS for GNEC patients after surgical resection. This well-performing model could help doctors enhance the treatment plan.

Molecular profiling of gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (G-NEC) usually has NEC and adenocarcinoma components and is considered to have a common origin in gastric adenocarcinoma because common pathogenic mutations are shared. However, G-NEC without adenocarcinoma also exists, and it may have a different mechanism of tumorigenesis. We aimed to elucidate the tumorigenesis of G-NEC by focusing on the proportion of NEC components. Thirteen patients with G-NEC were included in this study. Comprehensive genetic analysis using whole-exome sequencing was performed. G-NEC without an adenocarcinoma component was defined as pure NEC. TP53 was detected as the most frequent gene mutation (85% of the patients), independent of classification. RB1, KMT2C, LTBP1, and RYR2 mutations were identified in two of three pure NEC patients but were not detected in other G-NEC patients. Pure NEC has different somatic mutation profile than other NECs. This study provides insights into the mechanism of tumorigenesis in G-NEC.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the small intestine diagnosed as a result of paraneoplastic neurological syndrome.

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes, a diverse group of neurological syndromes, are associated with small cell lung, testicular, ovarian, and breast cancers; however, their association with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the small intestine remains unreported. In this report, we present the case of a 78-year-old man diagnosed with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the small intestine and experienced symptoms such as subacute progressive numbness of the extremities and impaired gait. These symptoms were diagnosed as tumor-associated neurological syndrome. The patient had also undergone pyloric gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer several years prior to the appearance of the neurological symptoms. Therefore, we could not determine whether the tumor-related neurologic syndrome was owing to gastric cancer or neuroendocrine carcinoma of the small intestine; however, one of these conditions was the cause of the neuropathy. The gait disturbance and numbness relatively improved after surgery for the neuroendocrine carcinoma of the small intestine, suggesting that the neuroendocrine carcinoma of the small intestine likely caused the paraneoplastic neurological syndrome. Collectively, we present a unique report highlighting the putative relationship between small bowel neuroendocrine carcinoma and tumor-associated neurologic syndromes.

Clinicopathological and genetic characteristics of gastric neuroendocrine tumour (NET) G3 and comparisons with neuroendocrine carcinoma and NET G2.

To characterise the clinicopathological and genetic characteristics of gastric neuroendocrine tumour G3 (gNET G3) and to compare them with those of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (gNEC) and gNET G2. A total of 115 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) were included, of which gNET G3 was different from gNET G1/G2 in terms of tumour location (P = 0.029), number (P = 0.003), size (P = 0.010), the Ki67 index (P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001) and TNM stage (P = 0.011), and different from gNEC/gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (gMiNEN) in terms of tumour size (P = 0.010) and the Ki67 index (P = 0.001). High-resolution copy number (CN) profiling and validation experiments showed CN gains and high expression of DLL3 in gNET G3. Hierarchical clustering analysis based on CN characteristics showed that gNET G3 was separated from gNEC but mixed with gNET G2. In gene set enrichment analysis, eight pathways were significantly enriched in gNEC when comparing gNET G3 and gNEC (P < 0.05), while no pathways were enriched when comparing gNET G3 and gNET G2. Whole-exome sequencing and validation experiments showed nonsense mutation of TP53 in one gNET G3, with wild-type staining for p53. In gNEC, TP53 mutations were detected in four of eight cases, and abnormal expression of p53 was detected in all cases. Gastric NET G3 is a distinct entity with unique genetic characteristics, which are different from those of gNEC than gNET G2. Our results provide insight into some molecular alterations that may contribute to the development and progression of gNET G3 and serve as potential therapeutic targets.

An integrated cellular and molecular model of gastric neuroendocrine cancer evolution highlights therapeutic targets.

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas (G-NEC) are aggressive malignancies with poorly understood biology and a lack of disease models. Here, we use genome sequencing to characterize the genomic landscapes of human G-NEC and its histologic variants. We identify global and subtype-specific alterations and expose hitherto unappreciated gains of MYC family members in a large part of cases. Genetic engineering and lineage tracing in mice delineate a model of G-NEC evolution, which defines MYC as a critical driver and positions the cancer cell of origin to the neuroendocrine compartment. MYC-driven tumors have pronounced metastatic competence and display defined signaling addictions, as revealed by large-scale genetic and pharmacologic screening of cell lines and organoid resources. We create global maps of G-NEC dependencies, highlight critical vulnerabilities, and validate therapeutic targets, including candidates for clinical drug repurposing. Our study gives comprehensive insights into G-NEC biology.

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma presenting complete durable response by nivolumab treatment for multiple metastases and radiotherapy to oligoprogressive metastasis.

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) are highly aggressive cancer with dismal prognosis. Platinum-based chemotherapy is used as the first-line treatment for this entity. However, there are no established therapeutic guidelines for platinum-resistant gastric NEC. We herein report a patient with metastatic gastric NEC who achieved durable and complete response to nivolumab with radiotherapy for oligoprogressive metastasis. A 70-year-old male patient had recurrences of resected gastric NEC, involving the liver and lymph nodes. His disease became refractory to cisplatin and etoposide combination therapy, after which he was treated with nivolumab. All the tumors showed marked shrinkage. However, 1year after starting nivolumab, one metastatic lesion of the liver began to enlarge, and radiotherapy was performed to the lesion. Thereafter, a complete response was obtained, which has been maintained without any treatment for the past 2 years.

Gastric Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Presenting as Perforation Peritonitis: a Rare Case Report

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas (GNECs) are rare tumors characterized by an aggressive clinical course, rapid progression, metastatic dissemination, and poor prognosis. Due to overlapping radiological features and small pre-operative biopsy specimens, they are frequently misdiagnosed as adenocarcinoma in the pre-operative period. These tumors are generally asymptomatic or present with non-specific symptoms like epigastric pain or discomfort, weight loss, and loss of appetite. However, GNECs presenting as perforation peritonitis are rarely reported in the literature. A 60-year-old man presented to the emergency department with complaints of pain upper abdomen with loss of weight and appetite for four months. He had an endoscopic biopsy report suggestive of antral growth reported as poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Radiological investigations were notable for the presence of a malignant lesion in the stomach with perforation. Subtotal gastrectomy with D1 lymph node resection was done. Specimen pathology confirmed poorly differentiated high grade large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. This article emphasizes the importance of considering GNEC as a differential diagnosis for gastric adenocarcinoma despite overlapping radiological features and challenges with pre-operative diagnosis due to its aggressive nature and to allow for appropriate management.

De-escalating chemotherapy for stage I–II gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma? A real-world competing risk analysis

BackgroundThe role of adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (GNEC) has not been well clarified yet. The study was designed to investigate the potential effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I–II GNEC patients and construct a predictive nomogram.MethodStage I–II GNEC patients were included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and divided into chemotherapy and no-chemotherapy groups. We used Kaplan–Meier survival analyses, propensity score matching (PSM), and competing risk analyses. The predictive nomogram was then built and validated.ResultsFour hundred four patients with stage I–II GNEC were enrolled from the SEER database while 28 patients from Hangzhou TCM Hospital were identified as the external validation cohort. After PSM, similar 5-year cancer-specific survival was observed in two groups. The outcomes of competing risk analysis indicated a similar 5-year cumulative incidence of cancer-specific death (CSD) between the two cohorts (35.4% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.731). And there was no significant relation between chemotherapy and CSD in the multivariate competing risks regression analysis (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48–1.31; p = 0.36). Furthermore, based on the variables from the multivariate analysis, a competing event nomogram was created to assess the 1-, 3-, and 5-year risks of CSD.The 1-, 3-, and 5-year area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values were 0.770, 0.759, and 0.671 in the training cohort, 0.809, 0.782, and 0.735 in the internal validation cohort, 0.786, 0.856, and 0.770 in the external validation cohort.Furthermore, calibration curves revealed that the expected and actual probabilities of CSD were relatively consistent.ConclusionStage I–II GNEC patients could not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. De-escalation of chemotherapy should be considered for stage I–II GNEC patients. The proposed nomogram exhibited excellent prediction ability.

Nomograms for predicting survival in patients with gastric carcinoid or neuroendocrine carcinoma based on the SEER database.

The aim of this study was to construct a competent model that can effectively predict the prognosis of patients with gastric carcinoid (GC) or neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Data of patients with GC or NEC were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1975 to 2017. Univariable and multivariable Cox analysis was used to determine the independent factors for patients with GC or NEC. Nomograms were established based on the independent factors and the results were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). A total of 214 patients with GC and 65 patients with gastric NEC were extracted from the SEER database. Independent prognostic factors for patients with GC were M stage, gender, age, and chemotherapy. Independent prognostic factors for patients with gastric NEC included age, M stage, and chemotherapy. ROC curves, calibration curves, and DCA confirmed that the nomograms can precisely predict the prognosis of patients with GC and NEC. The nomograms can effectively predict survival in patients with GC or NEC, which may assist the clinician in their decision-making and quantitatively judge the prognosis of individual patients.