Gasless Transaxillary Approach Research Articles

Oncologic outcomes and surgical completeness of remote-access thyroidectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

The oncologic safety and surgical completeness of remote-access thyroidectomies are not yet clearly established. This study evaluates the oncologic outcomes and surgical completeness of three prevalent remote-access thyroidectomies: the gasless transaxillary approach (GTAA), bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA), and transoral approach (TOA), in comparison with conventional transcervical thyroidectomy (CTT). Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases, covering the period from 2000 to 2023. Network meta-analyses were performed on selected studies, focusing on recurrence and surgical completeness. Surgical completeness was assessed using stimulated serum thyroglobulin levels and the count of retrieved lymph nodes. The review included 48 studies, encompassing a total of 16,356 patients. The number of retrieved lymph nodes was comparable among BABA, TOA, and CTT, while GTAA might be less effective. Stimulated serum thyroglobulin levels showed no significant differences across the four groups. However, the proportion of patients with stimulated thyroglobulin levels below 1.0 ng/mL was significantly lower in GTAA compared to the other groups. The overall recurrence rates were 1.31% for CTT, 0.89% for GTAA, 0.62% for BABA, and 0% for TOA, with no significant differences in recurrence rates when adjusted for follow-up duration. This study demonstrated that the oncologic outcomes of GTAA, BABA, and TOA are comparable to those of CTT, based on recurrence rates. In terms of surgical completeness, BABA and TOA showed equivalence to CTT, whereas GTAA might be inferior to the other techniques.

Clinical study on single-port endoscopic resection via a gasless transaxillary approach in the treatment of breast fibroadenoma in adolescents

BackgroundBreast fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast tumour. This study aimed to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of endoscopic-assisted resection via a gas-less transaxillary single-port approach for breast fibroadenoma in adolescent patients, compared with a traditional approach.MethodsThe clinical data of 83 patients with breast fibroadenoma treated in our hospital from October 2019 to October 2021 were collected for retrospective analysis. These patients were divided into an endoscopic-assisted surgery (ES) group (n = 39) and a traditional open surgery (OS) group (n = 44) according to the surgical approach. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe surgical cost was (5.1 ± 0.6) thousand Yuan [(0.7 ± 0.1) thousand US dollars] in the ES group and (3.5 ± 2.7) thousand Yuan [(0.5 ± 0.4) thousand US dollars] in the OS group, showing a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, or the rate of postoperative complications between the two groups. Stratified analysis revealed that the ES group had a significantly shorter operative time [(57.00 ± 10.26) min vs. (78.27 ± 7.63)] (p < 0.001), a smaller incision length [(3.73 ± 0.34) cm vs. (4.42 ± 0.44) cm] (p < 0.001), and a lower complication incidence rate (11.1% vs. 63.6) (p = 0.011) than the OS group in the cases with a nodule number ≥ 3. The satisfaction score using the BREAST-Q scale indicated that psychosocial well-being and patient satisfaction with the breast in the ES group were significantly superior to those in the OS group [(91.18 ± 3.12) points vs. (87.00 ± 4.45) points and (91.03 ± 6.80) points vs. (84.45 ± 6.06) points, respectively] (p < 0.001).ConclusionES is a safe and effective method for the treatment of fibroadenoma. In patients with multiple fibroadenomas (≥ 3 tumours), ES has a shorter operative time and fewer postoperative complications. ES demonstrates a significant, prominent advantage in cosmetic appearance. However, it should be noted that ES is associated with higher costs than OS.

Endoscopic hemithyroidectomy plus prophylactic central neck dissection via breast approach versus gasless transaxillary approach in treating low-risk papillary thyroid cancer: a retrospective series.

Hemithyroidectomy plus prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) has been adopted as a de-escalating surgical strategy for low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of these two different endoscopic approaches in the treatment of PTC with hemithyroidectomy plus pCND. This retrospective study reviewed medical records of 545 patients receiving breast approach (ETBA) (n = 263) or gasless transaxillary approach (ETGTA) (n = 282) in treating PTC. Demographics and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Preoperatively, the two groups were similar in demographics. Regarding surgical outcomes, no differences were found in terms of intraoperative bleeding, total amount of drainage, duration of drainage, postoperative pain, hospital stay, vocal cord palsy, hypoparathyroidism, hemorrhage, wound infection, chyle leakage, or subcutaneous ecchymosis. Conversely, ETBA recorded fewer skin paresthesia (1.5% vs. 5.0%, respectively) but longer operative times (138.1 ± 27.0 vs. 130.9 ± 30.8min,) and more swallowing disturbances (3.4% vs. 0.7%) compared to ETGTA (p < 0.05). No difference in scar cosmetic results, but ETBA had lower neck assessment score than ETGTA (2.6 ± 1.2 vs. 3.2 ± 2.0, p < 0.05). For low-risk PTC, endoscopic hemithyroidectomy plus pCND using either ETBA or ETGTA is both feasible and safe. Although the two approaches are comparable in terms of most surgical and oncological outcomes, ETBA is superior to ETGTA in terms of neck cosmetic results and skin paresthesia but is associated with more swallowing disturbances and requires a longer operative time.

Robotic thyroid surgery

Various remote access robotic thyroidectomy techniques have been developed using the da Vinci® surgical system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) to hide or avoid neck scarring and overcome the limitations of endoscopic thyroidectomy. Among those used today are the gasless transaxillary approach, the bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA), the gasless postauricular facelift approach, and the transoral approach. Especially, the recently introduced transoral approach (including robotic and endoscopic procedures) is prominent and now popular worldwide. The most significant advantages of remote access robotic thyroidectomy are excellent postoperative cosmesis and voice outcomes. The important limitations to the adoption of robotic thyroidectomy are the difficult technique, high complication rate during the learning curve, and high cost. In addition, cultural differences, longer operative times, and medicolegal issues are a barrier to the diffusion of robotic thyroidectomy. However, remote access robotic thyroidectomy is feasible, and the outcomes are comparable to those of conventional transcervical thyroidectomy if performed by experienced surgeons in highly selected patients. This article reviews the evolution and recent advances in robotic thyroid surgery.

Robotic and Endoscopic Thyroid Surgery: Evolution and Advances.

To minimize surgical morbidity and neck scarring, minimally invasive thyroidectomy and robotic/endoscopic thyroidectomy via cervical, axillary, anterior chest, breast, postauricular or transoral approaches have been developed over the past 20 years. In this article, we review the evolution of robotic and endoscopic thyroid surgery and recent advances. Among remote access approaches, the gasless transaxillary approach, bilateral axillo-breast approach, postauricular facelift approach, and transoral vestibular approach are in common use today. Each procedure has its own advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, we need to understand these advantages and limitations, and to select the appropriate method for each patient. The most significant advantage of remote access thyroidectomy is its excellent cosmesis. The complication rate is similar in patients undergoing a remote access approach and those undergoing conventional surgery if the former is performed by experienced surgeons. Operative time is significantly longer in remote access thyroidectomy. In conclusion, remote access thyroidectomy is feasible and its outcomes are comparable to those of conventional transcervical thyroidectomy in highly selected patients.

Yonsei Experience of 5000 Gasless Transaxillary Robotic Thyroidectomies.

Since the use of robot systems in thyroid surgery was introduced in 2007, we have advanced a novel method of robotic thyroidectomy (RT) using a gasless transaxillary approach (TAA). We report our experience with this technique and detail the surgical outcome of 5000 robotic thyroidectomies. From October 2007 to May 2016, we successfully performed 5000 robotic thyroidectomies using a gasless TAA at the Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System. The medical records of the patients are reviewed retrospectively, and the details of clinicopathologic characteristics, operation times, perioperative complications, and oncologic outcomes are analyzed. The 5000 patients with thyroid tumor (4804 with cancer and 196 with benign tumor) underwent RT using a gasless TAA. Mean operation time was 134.5±122.0min. The most common histologic subtype of thyroid cancer was papillary (98%), and the mean tumor size was 8.0±6.0mm. Stage I was found in 85.4% patients regarding tumor nodes metastasis staging. The 196 benign tumors consisted of 104 adenomatous hyperplasias (53.0%), 43 follicular adenomas (21.9%), 30 Graves' diseases (15.3%), and 19 others (9.7%). Postoperative complication occurred in 24.1% without any serious one, and overall morbidity tended to decrease over time. No disease-specific mortality was observed during the follow-up period. Locoregional recurrence was developed in 26 patients (0.5%). The authors have tried to improve RT technique using gasless TAA and achieved acceptable surgical outcomes. The rapid evolution of surgical robot technology and our constant effort to advance RT technique using gasless TAA would make it possible to reduce the perioperative morbidity and gain the best possible operative and oncologic outcomes.

Robot-assisted thyroidectomy using a gasless, transaxillary approach for the management of thyroid lesions: Indian experience.

Aim:Since last decades, more and more thyroidectomies have been performed by the minimally invasive method. Compared to conventional thyroidectomy, minimally invasive thyroidectomy has a superior cosmetic result. However, the outcome depends, in a large extent, on the skill of the operator and the learning curve is relatively long. Robotic thyroidectomy (RT) is a relatively new approach in treating thyroid lesions with improved ergonomics and surgical outcomes.Purpose:We performed a prospective study of robotic-assisted transaxillary approach for thyroidectomy in Indian patients to examine the feasibility of the procedure.Materials and Methods:A total of 35 patients underwent RT. Demographics, surgical indications, operative findings, postoperative functional outcome, local complications and pathological outcomes were recorded and analyzed.Results:The median age of the cohort was 28.6 years and 31 of the patients were women. The median size of the largest nodule was 3.2 cm (range, 1.0–4.5 cm). The median size of the largest nodule was 3.2 cm (range, 1.0–4.5 cm). Eighteen patients underwent less than total thyroidectomy and 17 patients underwent total thyroidectomy, with no conversion. The mean console time standard deviation was 115 min initially, and with experience, it reduced to 106 min for subsequent cases. The mean blood loss was 13 ml. Post-operative outcome was good with no serious complication noted in our series.Conclusion:Robotic-assisted thyroidectomy using a gasless transaxillary approach is a feasible, safe and noninferior surgical alternative for selected patients. We believe with time RT will be widened and it will be performed more often.

Comparative Study of Unilateral Axillo-Breast Approach with Gas Insufflation Versus Gasless Transaxillary Approach for Endoscopic Thyroidectomy in a Single Institute

Background and Objectives There have been various approaches introduced for endoscopic thyroidectomy. This study evaluates and compares the surgical outcomes of two such approaches: the unilateral axillo-breast approach (UABA) with gas and the gasless transaxillary approach (TA). Subjects and Method We retrospectively analyzed 279 patients who underwent endoscopic thyroidectomy via UABA with gas or gasless TA from March 2008 to August 2012. Studied variables were clinicopathologic data, surgical outcomes, complications, and cosmetic satisfactions. Results Of the 279 patients, 195 (69.9%) underwent UABA with gas and 84 (30.1%) underwent gasless TA. All of the variables related to clinicopathologic characteristics showed no significant differences between the two groups. The mean operation time was significantly shorter in the UABA with gas group (131.76±44.37 min) than in the gasless TA group (191.01±55.90 min) (p＜0.001). The mean postoperative pain Visual Analogue Scale scores in the UABA with gas group were 2.61±0.96 and 1.85±0.79, respectively, and those in the gasless TA group were 3.12±1.02 and 2.17±0.76, respectively, at 1 and 3 days after surgery. Incidences of postoperative complications were similar except for the higher rate of seroma in the gasless TA group. Cosmetic satisfaction scores of UABA with gas were higher than those of the gasless TA. Conclusion UABA with gas may be a good option for endoscopic thyroidectomy because this approach is less invasive than the gasless TA is. Key words: Endoscopy ㆍ Surgery ㆍ Thyroidectomy

Novel Experience with Neuromonitoring in Robotic Thyroidectomy Using a Gasless Transaxillary Approach

Abstract Introduction: Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring (C-IONM) by stimulation of the vagus nerve (VN) has been used in conventional and endoscopic thyroid surgery. To the best of our kno...

Transaxillary single-incision robotic neck dissection for metastatic thyroid cancer.

In head and neck area, neck dissection (ND) is one of the most complex and precision-needed procedure. The long cervical scar and post-operative neck discomfort have been also inevitable brands after this procedure. Heretofore, few dare to try endoscopic surgical technique to the ND mainly due to its complexity and jeopardy of complication. Although, there have been several reports about the endoscopic approaches for functional ND or ND, they had so many technical and instrumental limitations. The dexterities of the surgical robotics have advanced the techniques of endoscopic surgery, and have facilitated the most precise and delicate endoscopic surgical procedure in head and neck area. The technical feasibility and early surgical outcomes of robotic ND using the transaxillary approach for the management of metastatic thyroid cancer have already been reported as satisfactory. Robotic ND can allow complete compartment-oriented lymph node (LN) dissection without any fatal complications, or compromising oncologic principles. We previously described a novel method of robotic thyroidectomy with ND using a gasless transaxillary approach for metastatic thyroid cancer, and here, we firstly introduce a less invasive robotic procedure which has been modified from the original one, which we refer to as the transaxillary single-incision robotic ND.

Nationwide multicenter survey for current status of endoscopic thyroidectomy in Korea.

ObjectivesWe evaluated the current status of endoscopic thyroidectomy procedures in Korea in terms of indications, contraindications, advantages, disadvantages, complications, and limitations of each approach.MethodsAn email survey, consisting of 15 questions, was sent to 29 experienced endoscopic thyroidectomy surgeons.ResultsThe most commonly used approach was the gasless transaxillary approach (66.7%), followed by the bilateral axillo-breast approach with gas insufflation (23.8%). The most common indication was less than 1 cm, single papillary thyroid cancer. The role of endoscopic thyroidectomy is not still established; some consider it a novel procedure (34.8%), others a transition to robotic thyroidectomy (34.8%).ConclusionOur results shed light on the general consensus of opinions about endoscopic thyroidectomy, such as the advantages, disadvantages, complications, limitations, and even its future role.

Gasless Transaxillary Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

In 2001, the authors developed a novel method of gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET) and have now performed >1000 operations. This review was performed to document surgical outcomes after 10 years of experience with this technique and to determine what the role of ET has in the current era. All patients who underwent elective ET using the gasless transaxillary approach from November 2001 to December 2010 were evaluated. Patient demographics, surgical data, histologic analysis results, and complications were recorded and analyzed. A total of 1085 patients underwent ET during the study period. Mean patient age was 36.9±9.7 years; the gender ratio was 1:49 (male:female). There were 228 benign thyroid tumor cases and 857 thyroid malignancies. Trend analysis showed a progressive increase in case numbers per month until the end of 2007, followed by a steady decline. There were 175 total thyroidectomy cases and 910 cases of less-than-total thyroidectomy. Mean overall operating time was 132.92±48.6 minutes, and the overall complication rate was 13.5%. The most common complications were: transient hypocalcemia (6.3%), transient hoarseness (3.9%), hematoma (0.4%), permanent hypocalcemia (0.1%), and permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (0.2%). Gasless ET is comparable to open thyroidectomy in terms of early surgical outcomes and complications, and it bridges the gap between conventional open surgery and robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy.

Surgical outcomes of robotic thyroid surgery using a double incision gasless transaxillary approach: Analysis of 400 cases treated by the same surgeon

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of 400 cases of robotic thyroid surgery using a double incision gasless transaxillary approach. We analyzed 400 patients who underwent a robot-assisted thyroidectomy performed by a single surgeon. All patients underwent successful operations without conversion to open surgery. Transient hypoparathyroidism was the most common complication (51.7%) and permanent hypoparathyroidism occurred in only 2 patients (1.4%). The mean number of retrieved central lymph nodes was 6.5 ± 4.4 for ipsilateral central compartment node dissection and 8.4 ± 5.1 for bilateral central compartment node dissection. The proportion of patients with stimulated thyroglobulin (sTg) levels at the time of remnant ablation <10 ng/mL and sTg levels 6 to 12 months after the first ablation <1 ng/mL was 84.9% and 88.3%, respectively. Robotic thyroid surgery is technically safe and may be a surgical option for patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer.

Comparative study of a gasless transaxillary approach versus a bilateral axillo-breast approach for endoscopic thyroidectomy in a single institute

Gasless transaxillary approach (TA) and the bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) are 2 distinctive approaches for endoscopic thyroidectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare these 2 procedures. From May 2008 to July 2011, we performed endoscopic hemithyroidectomy via gasless TA (83 cases) and BABA (45 cases). The following variables were evaluated: operation time, postoperative pain score, drainage amount, drainage day, postoperative complications, and cosmetic satisfaction score. There were no significant differences between the 2 approaches in terms of clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes, except for postoperative pain and cosmetic satisfaction. As for postoperative pain and cosmetic satisfaction, the gasless TA group complained of less pain and the BABA group had a better cosmetic outcome. These findings will contribute to providing guidelines for the choice of surgeons between gasless TA and BABA techniques for endoscopic thyroidectomy.

Indications for the Gasless Transaxillary Robotic Approach to Thyroid Surgery: Experience of Forty-Seven Procedures at the American Hospital of Paris

Background: Thyroid surgery is in a state of evolution from traditional open approaches to novel robotic techniques. The gasless transaxillary approach to thyroid surgery is effective in the management of thyroid cancer, and complications after robotic thyroidectomy are no higher than experienced after open or endoscopic techniques. The transaxillary robotic approach also avoids an anterior neck scar. This paper presents what the authors believe to be the largest cohort of patients reported in Europe undergoing gasless transaxillary robotic thyroid surgery, with the aim of defining the indications for this procedure. Methods: Forty-six patients underwent robotic thyroid surgery via the transaxillary approach and were enrolled in this study between March 2010 and September 2012. All patients were operated on by one surgeon at one clinical center. Reviewed data included patient characteristics, pathological characteristics, extent of surgery and postoperative complications. The mean follow-up time was 7.29 months. Results: Forty-six patients underwent 47 procedures, the average age of the patients was 43 years and the male to female ratio was 1:22. Undertaken were 30 lobectomies, 3 subtotal thyroidectomies, 13 total thyroidectomies and 1 totalization. One case was converted to an open procedure. The ratio of malignant to benign disease was 1:6.67 (6:40 cases) and analysis of the surgical specimens showed 6 follicular lesions, 24 follicular adenomas, 3 colloid lesions, 1 case of thyroiditis/lymphatic lesion, 3 adenomatoid lesions, 3 oncocytic adenomas, 3 papillary cancers and 3 microcapillary cancers. The overall average size of an individual specimen removed was 45.40 ± 28.95 cm³ (range 5-160, n = 47) and the average largest diameter of the lesion removed was 3.72 ± 0.95 cm (range 1.4-6.0, n = 47). Postoperatively, there were 5 recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries (4 transient), 2 transient brachial plexopathies, 1 case of postoperative dysphagia and 1 of collection of blood at the site of surgery. There were no cases of disease recurrence at follow-up. Conclusions: The gasless robotic transaxillary approach to thyroid surgery has been predicted to become a standard technique. It has been shown to be efficacious in the management of thyroid cancer with lateral neck metastases; however, more data relating to oncological safety in long-term follow-up is required. This intervention is also appropriate for benign thyroid disease including Graves' disease. To achieve consistently successful results, careful patient selection is fundamental in terms of patient characteristics and the anatomical aspects of the lesion. This is especially important with a geographical expansion to include North America and Europe. The excellent cosmetic results of this procedure make it ideal for patients who have esthetic concerns regarding particular difficulties with healing; however, in common with all new surgical procedures, further evidence must be sought to confirm its indications over time.

Comparative Analysis of Oncological Outcomes and Quality of Life After Robotic versus Conventional Open Thyroidectomy With Modified Radical Neck Dissection in Patients With Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma and Lateral Neck Node Metastases

Robotic total thyroidectomy (TT) with modified radical neck dissection (MRND) using a gasless transaxillary approach has been reported safe and effective in patients with N1b papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), with notable cosmetic benefits when compared with conventional open TT. We have compared oncological outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in PTC patients undergoing robotic TT and MRND and those undergoing conventional open procedures. Between March 2010 and July 2011, 128 patients with PTC and lateral neck node metastases underwent TT with MRND, including 62 who underwent robotic and 66 who underwent open TT. We compared oncologic outcomes and safety as well as functional outcomes such as postoperative subjective voice and swallowing difficulties. We also evaluated neck pain, sensory changes, and cosmetic satisfaction after surgery using various QoL symptom scales. Neck and shoulder disability was assessed using arm abduction tests (AAT) and questions from the neck dissection impairment index (NDII). Although the mean operating time was significantly longer in the robotic (mean, 271.8 ± 50.2 min) than in the open group (mean, 208.9 ± 56.3 min) (P < .0001), postoperative complication rates and oncologic outcomes, including the results of radioactive iodine scans and postoperative serum Tg concentrations, did not differ significantly. Subjective voice outcomes and postoperative AAT and neck dissection impairment index were also similar, but postoperative swallowing difficulties (P = .0041) and sensory changes (P < .0001) were significantly more frequent in the open than in the robotic group. In particular, mean cosmetic satisfaction score was significantly higher in the robotic than in the open group (P < .0001). Robotic TT with MRND yielded similar oncologic outcomes and safety as conventional open procedures, with similar recovery of neck and shoulder disability. However, the robot technique resulted in better QoL outcomes, including better cosmetic results and reductions in neck sensory changes and swallowing discomfort.

Robotic Thyroidectomy and Neck Dissection

The advantages of endoscopic thyroidectomy and neck dissection include reduced hyperesthesia or paresthesia in the neck and favorable cosmetic outcomes. However, endoscopic thyroidectomy with neck dissection has a long learning curve, as well as technical limitations associated with a 2-dimensional view and a reduced dexterity of movement, particularly when operating in deep and narrow spaces such as the neck area. A robotic approach has been developed to overcome these limitations, facilitating manipulation and shortening the learning curve. This system enables the surgeon to control the 3-dimensional high-definition camera, reducing physiological tremors and enabling free dexterity of movement using articulated instruments. Therefore, robotic surgery has been found to eliminate many problems encountered with conventional endoscopic techniques.Recently, robotic thyroidectomy with neck dissection via a gasless transaxillary approach was shown to yield similar oncologic outcomes as conventional open procedures, as determined by postoperative radioactive iodine scans, serum thyroglobulin concentrations, and number of retrieved cervical lymph nodes. We also found that the robotic technique was safe and feasible in thyroid cancer patients, yielding excellent cosmetic results, reduced pain, improved sensory changes and decreased postoperative voice changes and swallowing discomfort. For surgeons, the use of a robot offers a shorter operation time and the need for a shorter learning curve than conventional endoscopic thyroidectomy. Robotic thyroidectomy also causes less musculoskeletal discomfort to surgeons than open or endoscopic thyroidectomy. The advantages of robotic surgery over open or endoscopic surgery suggest that robotic thyroidectomy with neck dissection may become the preferred surgical option for patients with thyroid cancer. Further analyses of surgeons' experience, assessments of long-term outcomes, and randomized controlled trials remain important.

Technical and Oncologic Safety of Robotic Thyroid Surgery

The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of a double-incision robot-assisted gasless transaxillary thyroidectomy procedure compared with conventional open thyroid surgery. We enrolled and analyzed 521 female patients with classic papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) who underwent a total thyroidectomy with central compartment node dissection (CCND) at the Asan Medical Center in Seoul, Korea from December 2008 to December 2010. These patients were classified into robotic (N=98) or open (N=423) groups and were compared with respect to clinicopathologic characteristics, complications, and stimulated thyroglobulin (sTg) levels at the time of immediate postoperative radioactive iodine remnant ablation (ablation sTg) and at 6-12 months after the first ablation (control sTg). The rate of perioperative complications was also similar, except for transient hypoparathyroidism in the robotic group. The median ablation sTg levels (0.39 vs 0.50ng/mL, P=0.215) and the proportion of patients with ablation sTg levels <10ng/mL (94.5 vs 98.0%, P=0.103) were also comparable between the robotic and open groups. In addition, the proportion of patients with control sTg levels <1ng/mL in both robotic and open groups (91.3 vs 95.6%, P=0.079) did not show a significant difference. Robotic thyroid surgery using a double-incision gasless transaxillary approach is technically safe and may provide a feasible option for a complete thyroid resection and adequate lymph node dissection in patients with PTC.

Comparison of the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting between women undergoing open or robot-assisted thyroidectomy

Open thyroidectomy is associated with a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in up to 70 % of cases. Use of the recently introduced robot-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy using a gasless transaxillary approach has been increasing because of its several advantages over open thyroidectomy. This study compared the incidence of PONV in the women who underwent open or robot-assisted thyroidectomy. This prospective, double-blinded study enrolled 170 women 20-60 years of age who were scheduled for conventional open thyroidectomy (group O) or robot-assisted thyroidectomy (group R). A standard anesthetic technique, including sevoflurane and air in oxygen, was used. During a 0-24-h postoperative period, the presence and severity of PONV (nausea, retching/vomiting), severity of pain, need for rescue antiemetics, and the degree of patient satisfaction were evaluated. During the 0-6-h postoperative period, the incidence of PONV and mean pain score (40.0 vs. 51.8 %and 4.2 vs. 4.8 in groups R and O, respectively) were not significantly different. At 6-24 h postoperatively, the incidence of PONV (18.8 vs. 44.7 %), severe emesis (11.8 vs. 29.4 %) and mean pain score (2.8 vs. 3.8) were significantly lower in group R compared to group O, respectively. Overall, the incidence of PONV (42.4 vs. 63.5 %) and severe emesis (20.0 vs. 43.5 %) were significantly lower in group R compared to group O, respectively. The incidence of satisfied patients 6 and 24 h after the end of anesthesia (55.3 vs. 28.2 and 82.4 vs. 58.8 %) were significantly higher in group R compared to group O, respectively. Robotic thyroidectomy reduces the incidence and severity of PONV compared to open thyroidectomy during a 0-24-h postoperative period.

Gasless transaxillary robotic versus endoscopic thyroidectomy: exploring the frontiers of scarless thyroidectomy through a preliminary comparison study

Robot-assisted thyroidectomy has been associated with lengthy operative times due to fussy robot preparation and docking maneuvers. The authors propose an endoscopic transaxillary approach using a novel platform, comparing its results with those of the former approach. Eight patients (6 females and 2 males; mean age, 38.8 years) with a favorable body habitus (mean body mass index [BMI], 23.4 kg/m(2)) underwent robot-assisted thyroidectomy through a gasless transaxillary approach using the da Vinci S system. Another four female patients (mean age, 31 years) underwent an endoscopic procedure. The patients' demographic data, operative time, complications, hospital stay, postoperative visual analog pain score (VAPS), and costs were compared. Three lobectomies, two near-total thyroidectomies, two total thyroidectomies, and one total thyroidectomy with lateral lymph node dissection were performed in the robotic group. Two lobectomies and two near total thyroidectomies were performed in the endoscopic group. The mean diameter of the largest nodule in the robotic series was 26.5 mm compared with 42.5 mm in the endoscopic group. The mean total operative time was 211 min for the robotic series compared with 160 min for the endoscopic series. There was one temporary recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis in the robotic group. Two patients in the robotic group exhibited transient symptomatic hypocalcemia compared with one patient in the endoscopic group. Hypoesthesia in the flap dissection area was experienced by three patients in the robotic group and two patients of the endoscopic group. The mean hospital stay was 1.5 days (range 1-3 days) in both groups. The postoperative VAPS also was similar in the two groups (3.1 vs 2.8). The cost was significantly less for the endoscopic approach. The preliminary comparison in this study shows that both approaches are safe and feasible, with similar results. They also afford an excellent view of the critical neck anatomy that allows precise tissue handling and dissection. However, the endoscopic approach results in a significantly faster and more convenient thyroidectomy.