Gamida Cell Research Articles

Nicotinamide-Expanded Allogeneic Natural Killer Cells with CD38 Deletion, Expressing an Enhanced CD38 Chimeric Antigen Receptor, Target Multiple Myeloma Cells.

Natural killer (NK) cells are a vital component of cancer immune surveillance. They provide a rapid and potent immune response, including direct cytotoxicity and mobilization of the immune system, without the need for antigen processing and presentation. NK cells may also be better tolerated than T cell therapy approaches and are susceptible to various gene manipulations. Therefore, NK cells have become the focus of extensive translational research. Gamida Cell's nicotinamide (NAM) platform for cultured NK cells provides an opportunity to enhance the therapeutic potential of NK cells. CD38 is an ectoenzyme ubiquitously expressed on the surface of various hematologic cells, including multiple myeloma (MM). It has been selected as a lead target for numerous monoclonal therapeutic antibodies against MM. Monoclonal antibodies target CD38, resulting in the lysis of MM plasma cells through various antibody-mediated mechanisms such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), complement-dependent cytotoxicity, and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, significantly improving the outcomes of patients with relapsed or refractory MM. However, this therapeutic strategy has inherent limitations, such as the anti-CD38-induced depletion of CD38-expressing NK cells, thus hindering ADCC. We have developed genetically engineered NK cells tailored to treat MM, in which CD38 was knocked-out using CRISPR-Cas9 technology and an enhanced chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) targeting CD38 was introduced using mRNA electroporation. This combined genetic approach allows for an improved cytotoxic activity directed against CD38-expressing MM cells without self-inflicted NK-cell-mediated fratricide. Preliminary results show near-complete abolition of fratricide with a 24-fold reduction in self-lysis from 19% in mock-transfected and untreated NK cells to 0.8% of self-lysis in CD38 knock-out CAR NK cells. Furthermore, we have observed significant enhancements in CD38-mediated activity in vitro, resulting in increased lysis of MM target cell lines. CD38 knock-out CAR NK cells also demonstrated significantly higher levels of NK activation markers in co-cultures with both untreated and αCD38-treated MM cell lines. These NAM-cultured NK cells with the combined genetic approach of CD38 knockout and addition of CD38 CAR represent a promising immunotherapeutic tool to target MM.

Omidubicel: First Approval.

Omidubicel (omidubicel-onlv; Omisirge®) is a nicotinamide-modified stem cell graft derived from cord blood that is being developed by Gamida Cell for the treatment of haematological malignancies and haemoglobinopathies. In April 2023, omidubicel received its first approval in the USA for use in adults and children aged ≥ 12 years with haematological malignancies who are planned for cord blood transplantation following myeloablative conditioning to reduce the incidence of infection and the time to neutrophil recovery. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of omidubicel leading to this first approval.

Omidubicel (Omisirge) for Neutrophil Recovery Following Myeloablative Conditioning Therapy

The FDA has approved omidubicel-onlv (Omisirge – Gamida Cell), a nicotinamide-modified, allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell therapy derived from cord blood, to reduce the time to neutrophil recovery and the risk of infection in patients ≥12 years old with hematologic malignancies who will undergo umbilical cord blood transplantation following myeloablative conditioning therapy.

Ensuring commercial readiness in the cellular cancer immunotherapy space

David McCall, Editor, Cell & Gene Therapy Insights, talks to three experts from Gamida Cell’s leadership team – Julian Adams PhD, CEO, Michele Korfin PhD, COO & CCO & Ronit Simantov MD, CMO & CSOJulian Adams joined Gamida Cell’s leadership team as CEO in November 2017, bringing more than 35 years of drug discovery and development experience to his role. Prior to his CEO appointment, Julian served as President and Chief Scientific Officer at Clal Biotechnology Industries (CBI), where he oversaw the Boston office, evaluating investment opportunities and supporting portfolio companies, including Gamida Cell. Before joining CBI, he served as president of research and development at Infinity Pharmaceuticals and as senior vice president of drug discovery and development at Millennium Pharmaceuticals, now part of Takeda Oncology. At Millennium, he played a key role in the discovery of Velcade (bortezomib), a therapy widely used for treatment of multiple myeloma. He was also instrumental at developing an oral inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), also known as duvelisib. In 2018, the FDA approved COPIKTRA (duvelisib, Verastem, Inc.) for adult patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Earlier in his career, while at Boehringer Ingelheim, he was credited with discovering Viramune (nevirapine) for HIV. He has also worked in research and development leadership roles at LeukoSite and at ProScript. Julian serves as Chairman at Elicio Therapeutics since 2017. He also serves on the Stand Up to Cancer Scientific Advisory Committee, AACR Council of Scientific Advisors, and MGH Center for Cancer Research Scientific Advisory Board.Julian has won several awards for his drug development efforts throughout his career, holds more than 40 patents from the United States Patent and Trademark Office and has authored more than 100 papers and book chapters in peer-reviewed journals. Julian holds a BSc from McGill University and a Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He also holds a ScD, honoris causa, from McGill University.Michele Korfin joined Gamida Cell’s leadership team as Chief Operating and Chief Commercial Officer in July 2020. Prior to Gamida Cell, Michele served as Chief Operating Officer at TYME Technologies. From 2016–2018, she was Vice President of Market Access at Kite Pharma, where she oversaw market access strategy, including payer relations, reimbursement and government affairs for YESCARTA®, the first approved CAR-T therapy in lymphoma. She also worked closely with the manufacturing and supply chain teams at Kite to prepare for FDA approval and commercialization. Before joining Kite, Michele spent more than a decade at Celgene in a variety of key strategic and operational roles, including in commercial leadership and oversight of the global development programs for REVLIMID®, a foundation therapy for multiple myeloma and MDS del 5Q. She also led the Celgene oncology sales force of over 120 representatives who were responsible for $650 million in revenue for ABRAXANE®, which is now a standard of care in pancreatic cancer. Michele has also held positions at Merck & Co. as a manufacturing scientist, Bain & Company as a consultant and Schering-Plough in sales and marketing. Michele holds an MBA from Harvard Business School and a BSc in pharmacy from Rutgers University. She is also on the Board of Trustees of BioNJ, the organization that represents the biotechnology industry for New Jersey.Ronit Simantov joined Gamida Cell’s leadership team as Chief Medical Officer in July 2017, bringing more than 20 years of experience in hematology and oncology research, development, registration and product launch. Prior to joining Gamida Cell, Ronit served as Head of Oncology Global Medical Affairs at Pfizer, where she was responsible for multiple programs including Sutent® (sunitinib), Inlyta ® (axitinib), Ibrance® (palbociclib), Bosulif® (bosutinib) and Xalkori ® (crizotinib). Ronit previously led phase 1-3 studies as Vice President of Clinical Research at OSI Pharmaceuticals. She also served as Chief Medical Officer at CuraGen Corporation (acquired by Celldex), where she led development of small molecules and antibody-drug conjugates. At Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Ronit led the phase 3 study of Nexavar® (sorafenib) resulting in the first approval of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in renal cell carcinoma. Prior to joining industry, Ronit spent seven years on the academic faculty at Weill Medical College of Cornell University, where she directed the fellowship program and conducted angiogenesis and vascular biology research. She has authored over 40 peer-reviewed manuscripts.Ronit holds an MD from New York University School of Medicine and a BSc. from Johns Hopkins University. She completed a residency in internal medicine at New York Hospital Cornell Medical Center, and a fellowship in hematology and oncology at Weill Cornell Medicine.

Tisagenlecleucel Vs Standard of Care As Second-Line Therapy of Primary Refractory or Relapsed Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Analysis of the Phase III Belinda Study

Tisagenlecleucel Vs Standard of Care As Second-Line Therapy of Primary Refractory or Relapsed Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Analysis of the Phase III Belinda Study

Transcriptional and Metabolic Profiling of Nicotinamide-Enhanced Natural Killer (NAM-NK) Cells (GDA-201)

Adoptive transfer of NK cells is a promising immunotherapeutic modality, however limited NK cell persistence and proliferation in vivo have historically been barriers to clinical success. Nicotinamide (NAM), an allosteric inhibitor of NAD-dependent enzymes, has been shown to preserve cell function and prevent differentiation in ex vivo culture of NK (NAM-NK) and other cells. Clinical responses were observed in a Phase 1 trial of NAM-NK (GDA-201) in patients with refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Bachanova, et. al., Blood 134:777, 2019). We now use transcriptional and metabolic profiling to characterize the mechanisms underlying the activity of NAM-NK.CD3 negative lymphocytes obtained from healthy donors were cultured for 14 days with IL-15 in the presence or absence of NAM (7 mM). Next generation sequencing (NGS), liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based metabolite quantification, and glycolytic/mitochondrial respiration measurements were performed. Transcriptome and pathway enrichment analyses were performed with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. Extracted cellular and medium metabolites were analyzed on a Thermo Q-Exactive Plus mass spectrometer coupled with a Vanquish UHPLC system. Extracellular acidification (ECAR) and oxygen consumption rates (OCR) were quantified using a Seahorse Extracellular Flux Analyzer. Glycolysis/citric acid cycle (TCA) rates were measured using isotope-labelled glucose incorporation assays.Transcriptome analyses defined 1,204 differentially expressed (DE) genes in NAM-NK vs. control NK. Biological/functional enrichment and pathway analyses of DE-genes predicted upregulation of cell cycle, DNA replication (CDK4/CDKN2D, CyclinD/E, MAD2L), RNA transcription, translation (SMN1/2, ABCF1, EIF4B, RPL13, RPS6), protein synthesis (EIF2, PABPC1, SOS, 60S complex) mitochondrial energy metabolism (NDUFB8, ATP5G2/E, COX7B/C) migration, homing (CD62L, CD44, DNAM1), and cytokine/chemokine response (IL18R, CXCR3, CCR5, XCL1, SOCS3, LFA1) pathways, with concomitant downregulation of cell exhaustion, senescence (BATF1, FOXP1, STAT1, CD86, LGALS9, LAG3), apoptosis, necrosis (CASP1, MDM2, IKK3), stress response (CALR, HSP90, HSPH1), and lymphoid cellular maturation (IL-2Ra, CD40L, GATA3) pathways in NAM-NK. Metabolomic analyses showed a significant increase of intracellular NAD, NADH, NADP, NADPH, high-energy triphosphates (ATP, UTP, GTP) and overall energy charge ([ATP+0.5*ADP]/[ATP+ADP+AMP]) in NAM-NK. Cellular metabolic fitness analyses revealed increased basal and ATP-linked respiration, mitochondrial maximal respiratory capacity, and glycolytic capacity in NAM-NK compared to control NK. In addition, NAM increased the rate of glucose incorporation into TCA cycle intermediates (acetyl-CoA, succinyl-CoA), consistent with a more rapid glycolysis rate, increased TCA cycling, and improved glucose consumption efficiency.Taken together, results of transcriptome, metabolomic, mitochondrial respiration, and glycolytic rate analyses suggest that NAM pleiotropically modulates key cellular metabolic functions in ex vivo-expanded NK cells, resulting in increased response to cytokine stimulation and enhanced potency. NAM inhibits differentiation, cellular stress, and exhaustion pathways that are typically activated in culture. Moreover, NAM increases cellular metabolic fitness, energy charge, and efficiency of glucose consumption, potentially imparting a protective effect against oxidative stress in the tumor microenvironment. These data offer insight into the mechanism of improved persistence, proliferation, and cytotoxicity observed in in vivo and clinical studies of GDA-201. DisclosuresYackoubov: Gamida Cell: Current Employment. Pato: Gamida Cell: Current Employment. Rifman: Gamida Cell: Current Employment. Cohen: Gamida Cell: Current Employment. Hailu: Gamida Cell: Current Employment. Persi: Gamida Cell: Current Employment. Berhani-Zipori: Gamida Cell: Current Employment. Edri: Gamida Cell: Current Employment. Peled: Biokine Therapeutics Ltd: Current Employment; Gamida Cell: Research Funding. Cichocki: Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics, Inc: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Rabinowitz: Gamida Cell: Research Funding. Lodie: Gamida Cell: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Adams: Gamida Cell: Current Employment. Simantov: Gamida Cell: Current Employment. Geffen: Gamida Cell: Current Employment.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) with Omidubicel Is Associated with Robust Immune Reconstitution and Lower Rates of Severe Infection Compared to Standard Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation

IntroductionOmidubicel is an advanced cell therapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), derived from appropriately HLA-matched umbilical cord blood (UCB) and comprised of ex-vivo expanded CD133+ cells and a non-cultured lymphocyte-containing fraction. Recent results of a global phase III trial of omidubicel vs standard UCB showed more rapid hematopoietic recovery, reduced rates of infection, and shorter hospitalizations in patients (pts) randomized to omidubicel (Horwitz et al, Blood, 2021). We now report results of correlative immune reconstitution (IR) studies in this trial (NCT02730299).MethodsA total of 125 pts aged 13-65 with hematologic malignancies were randomized to allogeneic transplantation with omidubicel or standard UCB following myeloablative conditioning; 108 pts were transplanted per protocol. An optional IR sub-study was conducted and blood was collected at intervals from Day 7 through one year post-transplant. Cryopreserved samples were analyzed in a central laboratory (Covance) using 16-color and 14-color panels and flow cytometric assays to explore T cell, NK cell, B cell, monocyte, and dendritic cell (DC) subsets. Means, medians, ranges, and standard errors were used to summarize cell counts, and one-tailed t-tests were used to compare counts in the two treatment arms.ResultsA total of 37 pts from 15 sites consented to the IR sub-study, representing 34% of the per protocol population; 17 pts were transplanted with omidubicel and 20 pts with control (15 [75%] of control with double UCB). Median age was 30 (range: 13-62) years for omidubicel pts and 43 (range: 19-55) years for controls in the sub-study. Median CD3+ content of omidubicel prior to cryopreservation was lower (180 x 10^6; range: 71-580 cells) than that of controls post-thaw (516 x 10^6, range: 183-990 cells).Omidubicel pts achieved neutrophil engraftment at a median of 10 (range: 6-28) days post-transplant compared to a median of 18.5 (range: 14-40) days in controls. Omidubicel pts had fewer BMT-CTN Grade 3 viral infections in the first-year post-transplant than controls (6% vs. 25%, respectively).At Day 7 post-transplant, CD4+ T cell counts were significantly higher in omidubicel pts (37x10^3 cells/ml) than in controls (17x10^3 cells/ml, p=0.011). B cells (12x10^3 vs 1x10^3 cells/ml, p=0.013) and NK cells (6x10^3 vs 3 x10^3 cells/ml, p=0.016), as well as monocyte and DC subsets, were also significantly higher in omidubicel pts (Table). Day 14 results similarly demonstrated higher counts of circulating immune cell subsets in omidubicel pts than in controls (Table). Higher B cell counts were observed in omidubicel pts than in controls at 6 months ([863±463] x10^3 vs. [543±221] x10^3 cells/ml, p=0.03) and one year ([1492±370] x10^3 vs [763±150] x10^3, p=0.02) following transplant (Figure).ConclusionsCirculating immune cell subsets were consistently higher in omidubicel pts than controls as early as one week after transplant, and higher B cell counts persisted through one year. These findings correlated with the clinical observation of fewer severe bacterial, fungal, and viral infections in pts treated with omidubicel compared to standard UCB. These results demonstrate that rapid hematopoietic recovery in pts transplanted with omidubicel is accompanied by the early and robust appearance of a broad array of lymphocyte, monocyte, DC, and NK cell subsets, despite substantially fewer numbers of these cells infused, suggesting a facilitator effect of omidubicel on their in vivo expansion. [Display omitted] DisclosuresSzabolcs: Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Prevail Therapeutics: Consultancy; Sotiria/Forge Biologics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Levy: Gamida Cell: Current Employment. Yackoubov: Gamida Cell: Current Employment. Pato: Gamida Cell: Current Employment. Galamidi-Cohen: Gamida Cell, Ltd: Current Employment. Horwitz: Gamida Cell: Research Funding.

Hospitalization and Healthcare Resource Use of Omidubicel Vs Cord Blood Transplantation for Hematological Malignancies in a Global Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial

IntroductionUmbilical cord blood (UCB) remains an important source of hematopoietic stem cells for patients, where no matched donor is available and for racial minorities. However, cord blood transplants have been associated with delayed hematopoietic recovery, prolonged hospitalization, and higher costs of transplant compared with other donor sources. Omidubicel is an advanced cell therapy that preserves stem cell function to optimize cell homing, engraftment, differentiation, and self-renewal and is manufactured from an appropriately HLA-matched single UCB unit for each patient. A recent phase III clinical trial (NCT02730299) reported that patients who received omidubicel experienced faster time to neutrophil engraftment, faster platelet recovery, reduced rates of infections and shorter hospitalization time than patients who received standard single (33%) or double (67%) UCB transplantation [Horwitz et al, Blood, 2021]. We report on an analysis of resource utilization including hospital length of stay, hospital care setting, visits by provider type, rates of transfusions and readmissions from the Phase III trial.MethodsThe Phase III clinical trial included patients aged 12-65 with hematological malignancies and eligible for an allogeneic transplant. The primary endpoint was time to neutrophil engraftment, with secondary endpoints of time to platelet engraftment, first grade 2/3 bacterial or fungal infections and days alive and out of hospital in the first 100 days. 125 patients were randomized in the study. We analyzed resource utilization data for patients treated with omidubicel (n=52) or UCB (n=56) (“as-treated population”) focusing on resource utilization within the first 100 days of transplantation. Summary statistics were compared between treatment arms, means and medians used to draw comparison and significance testing was performed.ResultsIn the Phase III clinical trial, omidubicel met its primary endpoint and secondary endpoints with statistical significance. The demographics and patient characteristics were overall well-balanced with slightly more males (52% vs 63%) and a lower median age (40 vs 36) in the UCB arm. The study population was diverse with 17.6% Black, 14.8% Asian, 14% Hispanic or Latino and 12% other/unknown. Most patients had AML (45%) or ALL (34.3%), with MDS, CML and lymphomas making up the rest of the study population. The disease risk index was high/very high in 35% of the patients and 24% of the patients had a Karnofsky/Lansky performance score of <90. The rapid hematopoietic recovery was supported by a reduced rate of infections. The rates of acute and chronic GVHD in the two arms were comparable.Within the first 100 days after transplant, omidubicel patients experienced shorter average total length of hospital stay than UCB recipients (mean 41.2 vs 50.8 days; p = 0.027) and more days alive and out of the hospital (mean 55.8 vs 43.7 days; p=0.023). 12% of patients on omidubicel arm died vs 16% on UCB arm before day 100. During the primary hospitalization (transplant to discharge), fewer omidubicel patients required intensive care unit (ICU) stay (9.6% vs 23.2%) and spent fewer days in the ICU (mean 0.4 vs 4.7 days; p =0.028) and the transplant unit (mean 25.3 vs 32.9 days; p =0.022) compared to UCB recipients. Omidubicel patients required fewer outpatient consultant visits and fewer outpatient non-consultant visits (X-rays, scans, biopsies etc.) and required fewer platelet or other transfusions (RBC, albumin, plasma, and factor product) within 100 days from transplant (Table 1).ConclusionsThis analysis shows that more rapid hematopoietic recovery in patients transplanted with omidubicel was associated with significantly shorter hospital length of stay and reduced healthcare resource use compared to UCB in the clinical trial. Although economic data were not collected as part of the clinical trial, the costs of providing transplantation care during the first 100 days are likely lower with omidubicel compared to UCB in the real-world setting, as hospital stay, outpatient visits, and blood product transfusions are among the major drivers of costs during this time period. [Display omitted] DisclosuresMajhail: Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Anthem, Inc: Consultancy. Manghani: Gamida Cell, Inc.: Current Employment; Tricida, Inc.: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Sivaraman: Incyte Corporation: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months; Gamida Cell, Inc.: Current Employment. Galamidi-Cohen: Gamida Cell, Ltd: Current Employment. Maziarz: Bristol-Myers, Squibb/Celgene, Intellia, Kite: Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy; Artiva Therapeutics: Consultancy; Intellia: Honoraria; Omeros: Research Funding; Athersys: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board, Patents & Royalties; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Data and Safety Monitoring board, Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vor Pharma: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board.

Gda-201, a Novel Metabolically Enhanced Allogeneic Natural Killer (NK) Cell Product Yields High Remission Rates in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): 2-Year Survival and Correlation with Cytokine IL7

Gda-201, a Novel Metabolically Enhanced Allogeneic Natural Killer (NK) Cell Product Yields High Remission Rates in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): 2-Year Survival and Correlation with Cytokine IL7

Impact of Center Experience with Donor Type and Treatment Platform on Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis BMT CTN 1101

BACKGROUND: Our group recently reported on the results of Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) Clinical Trials Network (CTN) 1101 a randomized comparison between double umbilical cord blood (dUCB) and haploidentical bone marrow (haplo) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (ptCy) in the nonmyeloablative setting that showed similar progression free survival (PFS) between the two treatment groups, but lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) and better of overall survival (OS) in the haplo arm. In this secondary analysis we sought to investigate if transplant center experience with haplo and or cord blood HCT had an impact on outcomes.PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patient randomized in BMT CTN 1101 were included. In order to determine the transplant center experience with either haplo or dUCB we queried the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) for number of transplants with each platform in the year prior to initiation of the study. Centers were then grouped as dUCB center (> 10 dUCB, n=117, 10 centers), Haplo center (>10 haplo and ≤10 dUCB, n=110, 2 centers), and ≤10 haplo and ≤10 dUCB HCTs (other center, n=140, 21 centers). Further analysis considered the alternative cut-off for haplo (> 5 vs ≤ 5) experience, and considered the outcomes based on the donor experience vs. others (e.g. dUCB > 10 vs. ≤ 10; haplo > 5 vs. ≤ 5).RESULTS: The effect of center experience on HCT outcomes shown in Figure, below . After adjusting for age, Karnofsky performance score and, disease risk index we found that there was no difference in outcomes between haplo and dUCB for centers that were experienced with dUCB or had limited to no experience with either dUCB or haplo. In contrast, in centers that were primarily experienced with haplo had better outcomes with this donor type, as compared to dUCB. The higher risk of treatment failure (relapse or death) and overall mortality in dUCB in haplo experienced centers was driven by significantly higher risk of relapse. We then considered the transplant experience with each of the donor types separately. In transplant centers that had performed > 10 dUCB, there were similar outcomes for recipients of both dUCB and haplo. Similarly, centers that had ≤ 5 haplo HCTs had no difference in outcomes between donor types suggesting an overlap with centers that had performed > 10 dUCB HCTs. Overall mortality was higher among dUCB recipients in centers that had performed ≤ 10 dUCB. Notably, the hazard ratio of non-relapse mortality favored haplo in all four donor experience type of transplant center, albeit not statistically significant.CONCLUSION: Except for dUCB recipients in centers with < 10 dUCB/year had worse overall mortality, primarily driven by relapse, the transplant center experience in the year prior to the initiation of BMT CTN 1101 had limited impact on the outcomes of this randomized clinical trial. [Display omitted] DisclosuresBrunstein: NANT: Research Funding; FATE: Research Funding; GamidaCell: Research Funding; BlueRock: Research Funding; AlloVir: Consultancy. Costa: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cutler: Deciphera: Consultancy; Cimeio: Consultancy; Editas: Consultancy; Kadmon: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Consultancy; CareDx: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Syndax: Consultancy; Mesoblast: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy. Horowitz: Sobi: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Orca Biosystems: Research Funding; Tscan: Research Funding; Xenikos: Research Funding; Miltenyi Biotech: Research Funding; Stemcyte: Research Funding; Medac: Research Funding; Vor Biopharma: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Kiadis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mesoblast: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc: Research Funding; Omeros: Research Funding; Magenta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Vertex: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Daiicho Sankyo: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Chimerix: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy; Actinium: Research Funding. Horwitz: Gamida Cell: Research Funding. McGuirk: Novartis: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; EcoR1 Capital: Consultancy; Pluristem Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astelllas Pharma: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite/ Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel accommodations, expense, Kite a Gilead company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rezvani: US Department of Justice: Consultancy; Kaleido: Other: One-time scientific advisory board; Nohla Therapeutics: Other: One-time scientific advisory board; Pharmacyclics-Abbvie: Research Funding. Rybka: Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Vasu: Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation with Omidubicel: Long-Term Follow-up from a Single Center

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation with Omidubicel: Long-Term Follow-up from a Single Center

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with Standard-of-Care Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Results from the US Lymphoma CAR-T Cell Consortium

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with Standard-of-Care Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Results from the US Lymphoma CAR-T Cell Consortium

Long-Term (≥4 Year and ≥5 Year) Overall Survival (OS) By 12- and 24-Month Event-Free Survival (EFS): An Updated Analysis of ZUMA-1, the Pivotal Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) in Patients (Pts) with Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL)

Long-Term (≥4 Year and ≥5 Year) Overall Survival (OS) By 12- and 24-Month Event-Free Survival (EFS): An Updated Analysis of ZUMA-1, the Pivotal Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) in Patients (Pts) with Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL)

A Multicenter Analysis of Outcomes, Toxicities, and Patterns of Use with Commercial Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Tisagenlecleucel for Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas

A Multicenter Analysis of Outcomes, Toxicities, and Patterns of Use with Commercial Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Tisagenlecleucel for Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas

Orca-T Results in High Gvhd-Free and Relapse-Free Survival Following Myeloablative Conditioning for Hematological Malignancies: Results of a Single Center Phase 2 and a Multicenter Phase 1b Study

Orca-T Results in High Gvhd-Free and Relapse-Free Survival Following Myeloablative Conditioning for Hematological Malignancies: Results of a Single Center Phase 2 and a Multicenter Phase 1b Study

Brexucabtagene Autoleucel for Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Real World Experience from the US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium

Brexucabtagene Autoleucel for Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Real World Experience from the US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium

Outcomes of Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma Patients with No Evidence of Measurable Disease at the Time of CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: The Experience from the CAR T Cell Consortium

Outcomes of Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma Patients with No Evidence of Measurable Disease at the Time of CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: The Experience from the CAR T Cell Consortium

Prophylactic Corticosteroid Use with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (R/R LBCL): One-Year Follow-up of ZUMA-1 Cohort 6 (C6)

Prophylactic Corticosteroid Use with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (R/R LBCL): One-Year Follow-up of ZUMA-1 Cohort 6 (C6)

Single Cell Transcriptome Profile of Myeloma and Immune Cell Characteristics in Patients with Durable Response Post CART

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) is a recent therapeutic advance for the treatment of myeloma. Among the FDA approved and investigational CAR-T, primary refractory disease post CAR-T infusion is uncommon, however most patients eventually relapse. To gain insight to the myeloma cell and immune cell characteristics associated with early relapse (PD) versus durable response (DR), we examined myeloma cells and immune cells in both the bone marrow and blood by single cell RNA-seq.Method: Bone marrow aspirate and blood samples were collected prior to BCMA targeted CAR-T therapy. CD138 + and CD138 neg cells from bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) were collected for 5' based scRNA-seq (10X Genomics). CD138 + cells were clustered by Harmony integration. Top expressing genes in unique clusters for PD and DR were analyzed by Ingenuity Pathway Analyses. To profile CD138 neg BM cells and PBMNC from myeloma patients, the scRNA-seq dataset was mapped to the human PBMC reference using the Seurat v4 reference-guiding approach. Differential gene expression between responders and non-responders was performed using the FindMarkers function for each of the immune cell clusters in the BM and PB.Results: BM and PB samples from 15 patients were analyzed. Among these, 5 patients had relapsed disease more than 1-year post CAR-T infusion (Durable Response, DR), and 10 patients had relapse within 1 year (early relapse, PD). Among these, CD138+ cells were available from 3 DR and 4 PD for analysis. Multimodal expression of BCMA were seen among the CD138+ cells across all samples. Using the mode of the highest expression level as a cut-off, patients with DR had a trend toward having higher fraction of BCMA high CD138+ cells compared to pts with PD. Clustering of all CD138+ cells by Harmony integration identified 12 distinct clusters, among which two clusters were unique to pts in DR, and one was unique to patients in PD. Ingenuity pathway analysis identified the top marker genes in these 3 clusters to be enriched in pathways for IL-15 signaling, BCR signaling, and primary immunodeficiency signaling. (Figure 1A-E.)Differential gene expression for immune cell clusters from CD138 neg BM cells and PBMNC were compared between pts in PD and DR. Interestingly, different patterns were seen in immune cells in PB and BM (Figure 1G). For example, compared to pts in PD, those with DR had decreased signaling in CD16 PB monocytes for interferon signaling and differentiation to macrophages, whereas the CD16 monocytes in the BM in pts in DR had increased expression of mitochondrial genes for anti-oxidant stress, polarization to M1 macrophage and anti-apoptosis. Similarly, pts in DR had CD8 Tcm in the BM with increased expression of genes involved in cell adhesion and anti-apoptosis, and CD4 Tcm in the BM with increased expression of genes in protein metabolism.Conclusion: scRNAseq analysis of myeloma cells suggest different tumor transcriptome profile may be identified in myeloma cells that could relapse early after CAR-T therapy. In addition, host immune profile both in the BM microenvironment and in systemic PB circulation could be associated with durable clinical response. [Display omitted] DisclosuresKapoor: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Glaxo SmithKline: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Ichnos Sciences: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Cellectar: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy. Dingli: GSK: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Apellis: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy. Kumar: Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tenebio: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Carsgen: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Lin: Merck: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sorrento: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Vineti: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Neutralizing Antibody Responses Against Sars-Cov-2 in Patients with Plasma Cell Disorders Who Are on Active Treatment after Two Doses of mRNA Vaccination

BackgroundPatients (Pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) experience prolonged immunosuppression due to the incurable nature of the disease and corresponding treatment modalities. Due to this many MM pts with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) require hospitalization, with an increased mortality rate over healthy adults. Two mRNA vaccines against (SARS-CoV-2): BNT162b2 & mRNA-1273 were approved under an emergency use authorization (EUA) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) due to the high efficacy in preventing SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study was to analyze the antibody (Abs) response in all pts with plasma cell disorders (PCD) including MM, AL-Amyloidosis, and smoldering myeloma (SMM) who are on active treatment.Patients & MethodsAll pts (MM, AL-Amyloidosis, and SMM) on active treatment who received SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine were identified at the University of Kansas Health System between January 2021 to July 2021and reviewed retrospectively. Descriptive analyses were performed on available data for patient characteristics. Abs against SARS-CoV-2 were measured using methodology approved by the FDA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; cPass SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Detection Kit; GenScript, Piscataway, NJ). We stratified pts into clinically relevant responders (>250 IU/mL), partial responders (50-250 IU/mL), and non-responders (<50 IU/mL)ResultsA total of 118 pts were identified in our analysis and are described in Table 1. Of the total pts, 102 (86%) had MM, 13 (11%) pts had AL-Amyloidosis, and 3 (3%) pts had SMM. Median age was 69 years (45-95), 96 pts (81%) were Caucasian, and 57 (48%) were male. Median lines of prior treatment was 2 (1-13). Active PCD patients were treated with single-agent therapy in 60 pts (51%), doublet-based therapy in 5 pts (4%), and triplet-based therapy in 51 pts (43%). Daratumumab based therapy was utilized in 59 pts (50%). All pts included received two doses of either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. At the time of abs testing 82 patients (69%) were in a very good partial response (VGPR) or better, 29 pts (25%) were in partial response, while 7 pts (6%) had stable disease. Five pts (4%) had COVID-19 infection prior to the vaccine. The median time between thesecond dose of the vaccine and testing for Abs was 100 days (34-190). Only 46 pts (39%) developed an adequate response, 36 pts (30.5%) had a partial response, while 36 (30.5%) did not respond to the vaccine. Low Ab levels were seen in all PCD subtypes with the following mean levels: SMM :25.4 (5.4- 36.9) IU/mL, MM 148 (0- >250) IU/mL, and AL- Amyloidosis 92.35 (range 0- >250) IU/mL. Among the 5 pts with COVID-19 infection prior to the vaccination, full Abs response was observed in 4 pts, and 1 patient had no Abs response. Type of treatment did not affect the response to treatment in any clinically meaningful way. The odds ratio of achieving a clinically relevant Abs response was higher in pts with absolute lymphocyte counts>0.5 K/uL (p=0.01) and IgG levels> 400 mg/dL (p=0.04) and lower in pts receiving treatments with daratumumab combinations or anti-BCMA therapy (p<0.0001). Higher levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Abs were observed in pts with ≥ VGPR (mean≈147 IU/mL) compared to <VGPR (mean≈ 119 IU/mL). However, in this dataset, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.17).ConclusionmRNA vaccine Ab response is lower in PCD pts getting active treatment compared with the general population. For PCD patients on active treatment, mRNA vaccine produced full antibody responses and partial responses in 39% and 30.5% of pts, respectively. anti-SARS-CoV-2 abs are especially low for patients on daratumumab combinations or anti-BCMA therapy, low lymphocytes, and low IgG levels at the time of vaccination. Some PCD may not develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 abs despite vaccination and/or previous COVID-19 infection. Therefore, checking anti-SARS-CoV-2 abs may be clinically useful in identifying patient's response. Further prospective studies should ascertain the value of a 3 rd vaccine dose in this population. [Display omitted] DisclosuresMahmoudjafari: Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McGuirk: Astelllas Pharma: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; EcoR1 Capital: Consultancy; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pluristem Therapeutics: Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite/ Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel accommodations, expense, Kite a Gilead company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding. Atrash: Jansen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding.