G-protein Coupled Receptor Pathways Research Articles

Generation of comprehensive GPCR-transducer-deficient cell lines to dissect complexity of GPCR signaling.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) compose the largest family of transmembrane receptors and are targets of approximately one-third of FDA approved drugs owing to their involvement in almost all physiological processes. GPCR signaling occurs through the activation of heterotrimeric G-protein complexes and β-arrestins, both of which serve as transducers resulting in distinct cellular responses. Despite seeming simple at first glance, accumulating evidence indicates that activation of either transducer is not a straightforward process, as a stimulation of a single molecule has the potential to activate multiple signaling branches. The complexity of GPCR signaling arises from the aspects of G-protein-coupling selectivity, biased signaling, interpathway crosstalk, and variable molecular modifications generating these diverse signaling patterns. Numerous questions relative to these aspects of signaling remained unanswered until the recent development of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Such genome editing technology presents opportunities to chronically eliminate the expression of G-protein subunits, β-arrestins, GRKs, and many other signaling nodes in the GPCR pathways at one's convenience. Here, we review the practicality of using CRISPR-Cas9-derived knockout (KO) cells in the experimental contexts of unravelling the molecular details of GPCR signaling mechanisms. To mention a few, KO cells have revealed the contribution of β-arrestins in ERK activation, Gα protein selectivity, GRK-based regulation of GPCRs, and many more, hence validating its broad applicability in GPCR studies. Significance Statement This review emphasizes the practical application of GPCR-effector KO cells in dissecting the intricate regulatory mechanisms of the GPCR signaling network. Currently available cell lines, along with accumulating KO cell lines in diverse cell types, offer valuable resources for systematically elucidating GPCR signaling regulation. Given the association of GPCR signaling with numerous diseases, uncovering the system-based signaling map is crucial for advancing the development of novel drugs targeting specific diseases.

β-arrestin1/2 are essential for embryonic lymphatic vessel development

Lymphatic dysfunction can lead to fetal loss due to interstitial edema known as hydrops fetalis during development and lymphedema in adulthood. Lymphedema affects an estimated 250 million individuals worldwide, yet there is no effective treatment available. Numerous studies have established G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) as key lymphangiogenic signaling pathways and ideal druggable therapeutical targets. β-arrestins (β-arrestin 1 and 2) are ubiquitously expressed cytosolic adaptor proteins which perform a wide range of functions in GPCR pathways, such as promoting agonist-induced internalization and forming signaling scaffolds with internalized GPCRs in endosomes. However, the roles of β-arrestins in lymphatic vessel development and function remain undefined. We hypothesize that β-arrestin1/2 are essential in embryonic lymphatic vessel development. To test this hypothesis, I used an inducible β-arrestin1fl/fl (Arrb1 fl/fl), β-arrestin2fl/fl (Arrb2 fl/fl);Prox1 CreERT2 mouse line. β-arrestin1 and 2 were deleted by oral gavage of tamoxifen at embryonic day 10.5 (E10.5) and E12.5, critical points for developmental lymphangiogenesis. Compared to Arrb1/2fl/flembryos, the Arrb1/2fl/fl;Prox1CreERT2 embryos exhibit profound hydrops fetalis, subcutaneous hemorrhages, and increased embryonic lethality between E14.5 and E16.5. At E15.5, the Arrb1/2fl/fl;Prox1CreERT2 embryos with edema show decreased weight indicating growth restriction compared to controls. Jugular lymphatic sacs are enlarged and filled with blood in Arrb1/2fl/fl;Prox1CreERT2 embryos compared to controls. Dermal lymphatic vessel length in the Arrb1/2fl/fl;Prox1CreERT2 embryos is shorter than controls. Collectively, our results demonstrate that loss of β-arrestin1/2 expression in lymphatics causes mid-gestational arrest in lymphatic development and fetal growth restriction, indicating that β-arrestins are required for developmental lymphangiogenesis in mammals. American Physiological Society postdoctoral Fellowship (to YT) and NIH R01 HL129086 (to KMC). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Olfaction evaluation in dogs with sudden acquired retinal degeneration syndrome.

To evaluate olfaction in dogs with sudden acquired retinal degeneration syndrome (SARDS) compared with sighted dogs and blind dogs without SARDS as control groups. Forty client-owned dogs. Olfactory threshold testing was performed on three groups: SARDS, sighted, and blind/non-SARDS using eugenol as the test odorant. The olfactory threshold was determined when subjects indicated the detection of a specific eugenol concentration with behavioral responses. Olfactory threshold, age, body weight, and environmental room factors were evaluated. Sixteen dogs with SARDS, 12 sighted dogs, and 12 blind/non-SARDS dogs demonstrated mean olfactory threshold pen numbers of 2.8 (SD = 1.4), 13.8 (SD = 1.4), and 13.4 (SD = 1.1), respectively, which correspond to actual mean concentrations of 0.017 g/mL, 1.7 × 10-13 g/mL and 4.26 × 10-13 g/mL, respectively. Dogs with SARDS had significantly poorer olfactory threshold scores compared with the two control groups (p < .001), with no difference between the control groups (p = .5). Age, weight, and room environment did not differ between the three groups. Dogs with SARDS have severely decreased olfaction capabilities compared with sighted dogs and blind/non-SARDS dogs. This finding supports the suspicion that SARDS is a systemic disease causing blindness, endocrinopathy, and hyposmia. Since the molecular pathways are similar in photoreceptors, olfactory receptors, and steroidogenesis with all using G-protein coupled receptors in the cell membrane, the cause of SARDS may exist at the G-protein associated interactions with intracellular cyclic nucleotides. Further investigations into G-protein coupled receptors pathway and canine olfactory receptor genes in SARDS patients may be valuable in revealing the cause of SARDS.

CLIC4 Regulates Endothelial Barrier Control by Mediating PAR1 Signaling via RhoA.

Endothelial CLICs (chloride intracellular channel proteins) CLIC1 and CLIC4 are required for the GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) S1PR1 (sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1) and S1PR3 to activate the small GTPases Rac1 (Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1) and RhoA (Ras homolog family member A). To determine whether CLIC1 and CLIC4 function in additional endothelial GPCR pathways, we evaluated CLIC function in thrombin signaling via the thrombin-regulated PAR1 (protease-activated receptor 1) and downstream effector RhoA. We assessed the ability of CLIC1 and CLIC4 to relocalize to cell membranes in response to thrombin in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). We examined CLIC1 and CLIC4 function in HUVEC by knocking down expression of each CLIC protein and compared thrombin-mediated RhoA or Rac1 activation, ERM (ezrin/radixin/moesin) phosphorylation, and endothelial barrier modulation in control and CLIC knockdown HUVEC. We generated a conditional murine allele of Clic4 and examined PAR1-mediated lung microvascular permeability and retinal angiogenesis in mice with endothelial-specific loss of Clic4. Thrombin promoted relocalization of CLIC4, but not CLIC1, to HUVEC membranes. Knockdown of CLIC4 in HUVEC reduced thrombin-mediated RhoA activation, ERM phosphorylation, and endothelial barrier disruption. Knockdown of CLIC1 did not reduce thrombin-mediated RhoA activity but prolonged the RhoA and endothelial barrier response to thrombin. Endothelial-specific deletion of Clic4 in mice reduced lung edema and microvascular permeability induced by PAR1 activating peptide. CLIC4 is a critical effector of endothelial PAR1 signaling and is required to regulate RhoA-mediated endothelial barrier disruption in cultured endothelial cells and murine lung endothelium. CLIC1 was not critical for thrombin-mediated barrier disruption but contributed to the barrier recovery phase after thrombin treatment.

Genetic Associations Between Stress-Related Disorders and Autoimmune Disease.

Objective: Emerging evidence supports a bidirectional phenotypic association between stress-related disorders and autoimmune disease. However, the biological underpinnings remain unclear. Here, the authors examined whether and how shared genetics contribute to the observed phenotypic associations. Methods: Based on data from 4,123,631 individuals identified from Swedish nationwide registers, familial coaggregation of stress-related disorders (any disorder or posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD]) and autoimmune disease were initially estimated in seven cohorts with different degrees of kinship. Polygenic risk score (PRS) analyses were then performed with individual-level genotyping data from 376,871 participants in the UK Biobank study. Finally, genetic correlation analyses and enrichment analyses were performed with genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics. Results: Familial coaggregation analyses revealed decreasing odds of concurrence of stress-related disorders and autoimmune disease with descending kinship or genetic relatedness between pairs of relatives; adjusted odds ratios were 1.51 (95% CI=1.09–2.07), 1.28 (95% CI=0.97–1.68), 1.16 (95% CI=1.14–1.18), and 1.01 (95% CI=0.98–1.03) for monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, full siblings, and half cousins, respectively. Statistically significant positive associations were observed between PRSs of stress-related disorders and autoimmune disease, as well as between PRSs of autoimmune disease and stress-related disorders. GWAS summary statistics revealed a genetic correlation of 0.26 (95% CI=0.14–0.38) between these two phenotypes and identified 10 common genes and five shared functional modules, including one module related to G-protein–coupled receptor pathways. Similar analyses performed for PTSD and specific autoimmune diseases (e.g., autoimmune thyroid disease) largely recapitulated the results of the main analyses. Conclusions: This study demonstrated familial coaggregation, genetic correlation, and common biological pathways between stress-related disorders and autoimmune disease.

Allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the largest family of transmembrane proteins, regulate a wide array of physiological processes in response to extracellular signals. Although these receptors have proven to be the most successful class of drug targets, their complicated signal transduction pathways (including different effector G proteins and β-arrestins) and mediation by orthosteric ligands often cause difficulties for drug development, such as on- or off-target effects. Interestingly, identification of ligands that engage allosteric binding sites, which are different from classic orthosteric sites, can promote pathway-specific effects in cooperation with orthosteric ligands. Such pharmacological properties of allosteric modulators offer new strategies to design safer GPCR-targeted therapeutics for various diseases. Here, we explore recent structural studies of GPCRs bound to allosteric modulators. Our inspection of all GPCR families reveals recognition mechanisms of allosteric regulation. More importantly, this review highlights the diversity of allosteric sites and presents how allosteric modulators control specific GPCR pathways to provide opportunities for the development of new valuable agents.

Proteogenomic landscape and clinical characterization of GH-producing pituitary adenomas/somatotroph pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

The clinical characteristics of growth hormone (GH)-producing pituitary adenomas/somatotroph pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (GHomas/somatotroph PitNETs) vary across patients. In this study, we aimed to integrate the genetic alterations, protein expression profiles, transcriptomes, and clinical characteristics of GHomas/somatotroph PitNETs to identify molecules associated with acromegaly characteristics. Targeted capture sequencing and copy number analysis of 36 genes and nontargeted proteomics analysis were performed on fresh-frozen samples from 121 sporadic GHomas/somatotroph PitNETs. Targeted capture sequencing revealed GNAS as the only driver gene, as previously reported. Classification by consensus clustering using both RNA sequencing and proteomics revealed many similarities between the proteome and the transcriptome. Gene ontology analysis was performed for differentially expressed proteins between wild-type and mutant GNAS samples identified by nontargeted proteomics and involved in G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) pathways. The results suggested that GNAS mutations impact endocrinological features in acromegaly through GPCR pathway induction. ATP2A2 and ARID5B correlated with the GH change rate in the octreotide loading test, and WWC3, SERINC1, and ZFAND3 correlated with the tumor volume change rate after somatostatin analog treatment. These results identified a biological connection between GNAS mutations and the clinical and biochemical characteristics of acromegaly, revealing molecules associated with acromegaly that may affect medical treatment efficacy.

Insights into the Promising Prospect of G Protein and GPCR-Mediated Signaling in Neuropathophysiology and Its Therapeutic Regulation.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are intricately involved in the conversion of extracellular feedback to intracellular responses. These specialized receptors possess a crucial role in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Most nonsensory GPCRs are active in almost 90% of complex brain functions. At the time of receptor phosphorylation, a GPCR pathway is essentially activated through a G protein signaling mechanism via a G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK). Dopamine, an important neurotransmitter, is primarily involved in the pathophysiology of several CNS disorders; for instance, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, and ADHD. Since dopamine, acetylcholine, and glutamate are potent neuropharmacological targets, dopamine itself has potential therapeutic effects in several CNS disorders. GPCRs essentially regulate brain functions by modulating downstream signaling pathways. GPR6, GPR52, and GPR8 are termed orphan GPCRs because they colocalize with dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in neurons of the basal ganglia, either alone or with both receptors. Among the orphan GPCRs, the GPR52 is recognized for being an effective psychiatric receptor. Various antipsychotics like aripiprazole and quetiapine mainly target GPCRs to exert their actions. One of the most important parts of signal transduction is the regulation of G protein signaling (RGS). These substances inhibit the activation of the G protein that initiates GPCR signaling. Developing a combination of RGS inhibitors with GPCR agonists may prove to have promising therapeutic potential. Indeed, several recent studies have suggested that GPCRs represent potentially valuable therapeutic targets for various psychiatric disorders. Molecular biology and genetically modified animal model studies recommend that these enriched GPCRs may also act as potential therapeutic psychoreceptors. Neurotransmitter and neuropeptide GPCR malfunction in the frontal cortex and limbic-related regions, including the hippocampus, hypothalamus, and brainstem, is likely responsible for the complex clinical picture that includes cognitive, perceptual, emotional, and motor symptoms. G protein and GPCR-mediated signaling play a critical role in developing new treatment options for mental health issues, and this study is aimed at offering a thorough picture of that involvement. For patients who are resistant to current therapies, the development of new drugs that target GPCR signaling cascades remains an interesting possibility. These discoveries might serve as a fresh foundation for the creation of creative methods for pharmacologically useful modulation of GPCR function.

Functions of regulators of G protein signaling 16 in immunity, inflammation, and other diseases.

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) act as guanosine triphosphatase activating proteins to accelerate guanosine triphosphate hydrolysis of the G protein α subunit, leading to the termination of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) downstream signaling pathway. RGS16, which is expressed in a number of cells and tissues, belongs to one of the small B/R4 subfamilies of RGS proteins and consists of a conserved RGS structural domain with short, disordered amino- and carboxy-terminal extensions and an α-helix that classically binds and de-activates heterotrimeric G proteins. However, with the deepening of research, it has been revealed that RGS16 protein not only regulates the classical GPCR pathway, but also affects immune, inflammatory, tumor and metabolic processes through other signaling pathways including the mitogen-activated protein kinase, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B, Ras homolog family member A and stromal cell-derived factor 1/C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 pathways. Additionally, the RGS16 protein may be involved in the Hepatitis B Virus -induced inflammatory response. Therefore, given the continuous expansion of knowledge regarding its role and mechanism, the structure, characteristics, regulatory mechanisms and known functions of the small RGS proteinRGS16 are reviewed in this paper to prepare for diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic evaluation of different diseases such as inflammation, tumor, and metabolic disorders and to better study its function in other diseases.

Phosphorylation of RGS regulates MAP kinase localization and promotes completion of cytokinesis

Yeast use the G-protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway to detect and track the mating pheromone. The G-protein-coupled receptor pathway is inhibited by the regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) Sst2 which induces Gα GTPase activity and inactivation of downstream signaling. G-protein signaling activates the MAPK Fus3, which phosphorylates the RGS; however, the role of this modification is unknown. We found that pheromone-induced RGS phosphorylation peaks early; the phospho-state of RGS controls its localization and influences MAPK spatial distribution. Surprisingly, phosphorylation of the RGS promotes completion of cytokinesis before pheromone-induced growth. Completion of cytokinesis in the presence of pheromone is promoted by the kelch-repeat protein, Kel1 and antagonized by the formin Bni1. We found that RGS complexes with Kel1 and prefers the unphosphorylatable RGS mutant. We also found overexpression of unphosphorylatable RGS exacerbates cytokinetic defects, whereas they are rescued by overexpression of Kel1. These data lead us to a model where Kel1 promotes completion of cytokinesis before pheromone-induced polarity but is inhibited by unphosphorylated RGS binding.

Low signaling efficiency from receptor to effector in olfactory transduction: A quantified ligand-triggered GPCR pathway

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling is ubiquitous. As an archetype of this signaling motif, rod phototransduction has provided many fundamental, quantitative details, including a dogma that one active GPCR molecule activates a substantial number of downstream G protein/enzyme effector complexes. However, rod phototransduction is light-activated, whereas GPCR pathways are predominantly ligand-activated. Here, we report a detailed study of the ligand-triggered GPCR pathway in mammalian olfactory transduction, finding that an odorant-receptor molecule when (one-time) complexed with its most effective odorants produces on average much less than one downstream effector. Further experiments gave a nominal success probability of tentatively ∼10-4 (more conservatively, ∼10-2 to ∼10-5). This picture is potentially more generally representative of GPCR signaling than is rod phototransduction, constituting a paradigm shift.

Elucidating the Bitter Taste Signaling Paradox in Airway Smooth Muscle Relaxation

RATIONALEAirway smooth muscle (ASM) hypersensitivity and hypercontractility play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of obstructive airway diseases such as asthma. Furthermore, over half of affected individuals are unable to reliably control these disorders using the current standard of care, β‐(adrenergic) agonists. Previously, our group discovered the expression of a novel group of G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs), type 2 taste receptors (TAS2Rs), in the human airway which evoke ASM relaxation. Previous work in our lab suggests that TAS2R agonists evoke relaxation in a G protein beta‐gamma subunit‐, phospholipase C beta‐ and calcium‐dependent manner. We hypothesized that the downstream molecular targets of contractile‐related signaling components are differentially regulated by TAS2Rs compared to other GPCRs. The goal of this study was to establish the molecular mechanism by which TAS2Rs induce ASM relaxation.METHODSWe employed a phosphoproteomic approach, involving dual‐mass spectrometry, to determine differences in the phosphorylation status of contractile‐related proteins in ASM following the stimulation of TAS2Rs and other GPCRs. Healthy human ASM cells were treated with the TAS2R agonist chloroquine or β‐agonist isoproterenol alone or in combination with the bronchoconstrictive agonist histamine to study the ability of each relaxant compound to attenuate the histamine‐mediated phosphorylation profile of contractile‐related proteins. These phosphoproteomic profiles were compared and a select set of targets were validated using western blot analysis.RESULTSOur phosphoproteomic data demonstrated that histamine stimulation results in increased phosphorylation of Ras homolog family member A (RhoA) guanine nucleotide exchange factor (ARHGEF) 12 and A kinase anchoring proteins (AKAP) 2 and 12, as well as decreased phosphorylation of RhoA GTPase‐activating protein (ARHGAP) 6. Furthermore, chloroquine treatment attenuated histamine‐induced phosphorylation of ARHGEF12 but not AKAP2 or AKAP12. Interestingly, isoproterenol attenuated histamine‐induced phosphorylation of AKAP2 and AKAP12 but not ARHGEF12. Validation studies using western blot analysis revealed chloroquine mediated inhibition of histamine‐induced RhoA activation and myosin phosphatase target subunit 1 (MYPT1) phosphorylation at the T853 residue, which was not observed with isoproterenol.CONCLUSIONOur findings were able to show that contractile‐related proteins are phosphorylated differentially by chloroquine and isoproterenol to elicit ASM relaxation. Furthermore, our studies strongly suggest the importance of RhoA and the T853 residue on MYPT1 as points of mechanistic divergence between TAS2R and other GPCR pathways. These findings provide further insight into the mechanism by which TAS2R signaling reduces airway contractility and its potential as a novel therapy for obstructive airway disease.

Identification of Novel Regulators for GPCR‐signaling via Genome‐wide Analysis

G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large family of proteins responsible for receiving and responding to many signals such as smell, light, and hormones. GPCRs are also the target for approximately thirty‐four percent of all FDA approved drugs. Therefore, gaining new insight about GPCR signaling regulation can be useful for improving our understanding of cellular physiology and enhancing the effectiveness of the drugs we use. GPCR signaling is highly conserved, enabling the use of model organisms, such as budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, to study its regulation. Yeast responds to pheromone using a well‐characterized GPCR pathway. In this project, we screened a collection of yeast mutants that all had one gene deleted from their genome, using a well‐established assay that measures pheromone response. From this screen, we have identified seven novel mutants that clearly and consistently alter the pheromone response. Further analysis of these mutants indicates that some of them affect the pheromone response at the level of or upstream of MAP kinase Fus3. We are in the process of cloning these genes and examining if the abnormal pheromone response and Fus3 activation of these mutants can be rescued. Our analysis suggests that unbiased genome‐wide genetic screening remains a viable approach in identifying novel regulators for GPCR‐mediated signaling.

Elevation of phospholipase C-β1 expression by amyloid-β facilitates calcium overload in neuronal cells

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder and the leading cause of dementia. Amyloid-β (Aβ) has long been considered a key cause of neurodegeneration in the AD brain. Although the mechanisms underlying Aβ-induced neurodegeneration are not fully understood, a number of recent studies have suggested that intracellular calcium overload mediates this process. In this study, we focused on the cellular function of phospholipase C-β1 (PLCB1), which regulates calcium signaling by mediating hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate through G-protein coupled receptor pathways. First, we confirmed that acetylcholine-induced calcium release from intracellular stores of SH-SY5Y cells was significantly increased with Aβ42 oligomer treatment. We further found that PLCB1 expression was upregulated in Aβ42-treated cells, and PLCB1 overexpression in SH-SY5Y cells elicited the calcium overload observed in Aβ-treated cells. In addition, Aβ42 oligomer-induced calcium overload in SH-SY5Y cells was alleviated by knockdown of PLCB1, indicating that PLCB1 plays an essential role in the neurotoxic process initiated by Aβ. The elevation of PLCB1 expression was confirmed in the brain tissues from the 5× familial AD (5×FAD) model mice. These findings suggest that PLCB1 may represent a potential therapeutic target for protecting neuronal cells against excitotoxicity in AD progression.

Predicting Mechanisms of Ibrutinib-Resistance in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Using Computational-Based Modeling for Personalized Therapy with Clinical Validation

Background: Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), a mediator of B cell receptor signaling, has been effectively exploited as a therapeutic target in Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ibrutinib is a BTK inhibitor that has shown excellent efficacy in treatment-naïve, relapsed/refractory, and high-risk CLL. However, concerns regarding ibrutinib resistance have emerged and characterizing the underlying mechanisms may aid in identifying patients with increased risk of resistance/disease progression. Moreover, understanding the interplay between determinants of ibrutinib resistance may reveal alternate therapeutic targets. Using a computational biology modeling (CBM) simulation-based method, we reverse-engineered the salient molecular architecture of a CLL patient progressing on ibrutinib to identify potential drug combinations to overcome drug resistance and induce remission.Methods: For validation of the computational biological modeling (CBM) software (Cellworks group), we selected a cohort of 15 ibrutinib resistant CLL patients from previously published studies (Table 1). Genomic data derived from whole exome sequencing (WES), targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS), copy number variation (CNV), and/or karyotype data were used in this study. All available genomic data for each profile was entered into the CBM, which generates a disease-specific protein network map using PubMed and other online resources. Disease-biomarkers that are unique to each patient were identified within the protein network maps by using CBM technology. Ibrutinib was selected from a digital drug library and simulated on every relapsed CLL patient case. Drug impact was assessed by quantitatively measuring the drug's effect on a cell growth score, which is a composite of cell proliferation, viability, and apoptosis, along with the simulated impact on each disease-specific biomarker score. Each patient-specific map was digitally screened to identify any Ibrutinib resistance mechanism(s).Results: In our modeled patient set, 4 different resistance mechanisms were identified across 14/15 ibrutinib- refractory CLL cases. 1) BTK C481S mutation (n=4) impacts ibrutinib binding affinity; 2) PLCG2 mutations (n=4) lead to activation of PRKCB and AKT1 signaling; 3) CARD11 mutation (n=2) results in constitutive activation of BTK downstream effectors; and 4) decreased G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) pathway signaling, an upstream activator of BTK (n=5), was found to be a novel resistance mechanism identified by CBM. Knockdown (KD) of ALOX5AP, ARRB1 and CYSLTR2 reduced GPCR pathway signaling, resulting in reduced BTK activity (Table 1). After validating the CBM algorithm, we rendered a digital avatar for a relapsed-refractory CLL patient (Del17p+); progressing on ibrutinib. The patient had rapidly escalating ALC and lymphadenopathy; with the largest node measuring ~16cm. In addition to p53 loss, simulation modeling accounted for BTK C481S mutation (BAF 0.69) expressed in the patients tumor cells. CBM predicted venetoclax would be the most effective therapeutic for the patient due to several upstream signaling pathways converging on Bcl-2. Indeed, addition of venetoclax to the ongoing ibrutinib monotherapy dramatically reduced the patients ALC (from 113 to 3.3 x 109/L) by day 4 post-treatment, accompanied by reduction in lymphadenopathy (left axillary node decreased to ~3cm). Ibrutinib was discontinued within 1 month of starting the combination, with venetoclax monotherapy continued per dosing guidelines thereafter. Notably, the patient maintained remission status on venetoclax monotherapy alone.Conclusions: Computational modeling was used to identify ibrutinib resistance mechanisms in CLL patients. Using this novel approach, we identified an effective therapy (venetoclax) for a high-risk CLL patient who was progressing on ibrutinib. CBM-based approaches can be used to predict alternative therapeutic regimens for drug-refractory patients, targeting the disease-specific biomarkers unique to each patient. Altogether, our study demonstrates proof-of-principle on the use of computational predictive algorithms to simulate multiple protein-interaction networks operational in a tumor cell to exploit individualized therapeutic vulnerabilities. [Display omitted] DisclosuresYsebaert:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kumar:Cellworks: Employment. Singh:Cellworks Research India Pvt. Ltd: Employment. Ullal:Cellworks Research India: Employment. Bhargav:Cellworks: Employment. Azam:cellworks: Employment. Abbasi:Cellworks Group Inc.: Employment. Vali:Cellworks Group Inc.: Employment. Cogle:Celgene: Other: Membership on Steering Committee for Connect MDS/AML Registry.

Specific and behaviorally consequential astrocyte Gq GPCR signaling attenuation in vivo with iβARK

Astrocytes respond to neurotransmitters and neuromodulators using G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to mediate physiological responses. Despite their importance, there has been no method to genetically, specifically, and effectively attenuate astrocyte Gq GPCR pathways to explore consequences of this prevalent signaling mechanism invivo. We report a 122-residue inhibitory peptide from β-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 (iβARK; and inactive D110A control) to attenuate astrocyte Gq GPCR signaling. iβARK significantly attenuated Gq GPCR Ca2+ signaling in brain slices and, invivo, altered behavioral responses, spared other GPCR responses, and did not alter astrocyte spontaneous Ca2+ signals, morphology, electrophysiological properties, or gene expression in the striatum. Furthermore, brain-wide attenuation of astrocyte Gq GPCR signaling with iβARK using PHP.eB adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), when combined with c-Fos mapping, suggested nuclei-specific contributions to behavioral adaptation and spatial memory. iβARK extends the toolkit needed to explore functions of astrocyte Gq GPCR signaling within neural circuits invivo.

Differential methylation of G-protein coupled receptor signaling genes in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the small intestine undergo large chromosomal and methylation changes. The objective of this study was to identify methylation differences in NETs and consider how the differentially methylated genes may impact patient survival. Genome-wide methylation and chromosomal copy number variation (CNV) of NETs from the small intestine and appendix were measured. Tumors were divided into three molecular subtypes according to CNV results: chromosome 18 loss (18LOH), Multiple CNV, and No CNV. Comparison of 18LOH tumors with MultiCNV and NoCNV tumors identified 901 differentially methylated genes. Genes from the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) pathways are statistically overrepresented in the differentially methylated genes. One of the highlighted genes from the GPCR pathway is somatostatin (SST), a clinical target for NETs. Patient survival based on low versus high methylation in all samples identified four significant genes (p < 0.05) OR2S2, SMILR, RNU6-653P, and AC010543.1. Within the 18LOH molecular subtype tumors, survival differences were identified in high versus low methylation of 24 genes. The most significant is TRHR (p < 0.01), a GPCR with multiple FDA-approved drugs. By separating NETs into different molecular subtypes based on chromosomal changes, we find that multiple GPCRs and their ligands appear to be regulated through methylation and correlated with survival. These results suggest opportunities for better treatment strategies for NETs based on molecular features.

G-Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs): Signaling Pathways, Characterization, and Functions in Insect Physiology and Toxicology.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are known to play central roles in the physiology of many organisms. Members of this seven α-helical transmembrane protein family transduce the extracellular signals and regulate intracellular second messengers through coupling to heterotrimeric G-proteins, adenylate cyclase, cAMPs, and protein kinases. As a result of the critical function of GPCRs in cell physiology and biochemistry, they not only play important roles in cell biology and the medicines used to treat a wide range of human diseases but also in insects’ physiological functions. Recent studies have revealed the expression and function of GPCRs in insecticide resistance, improving our understanding of the molecular complexes governing the development of insecticide resistance. This article focuses on the review of G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathways in insect physiology, including insects’ reproduction, growth and development, stress responses, feeding, behaviors, and other physiological processes. Hormones and polypeptides that are involved in insect GPCR regulatory pathways are reviewed. The review also gives a brief introduction of GPCR pathways in organisms in general. At the end of the review, it provides the recent studies on the function of GPCRs in the development of insecticide resistance, focusing in particular on our current knowledge of the expression and function of GPCRs and their downstream regulation pathways and their roles in insecticide resistance and the regulation of resistance P450 gene expression. The latest insights into the exciting technological advances and new techniques for gene expression and functional characterization of the GPCRs in insects are provided.

Cortical astrocytes independently regulate sleep depth and duration via separate GPCR pathways.

Non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, characterized by slow-wave electrophysiological activity, underlies several critical functions, including learning and memory. However, NREM sleep is heterogeneous, varying in duration, depth, and spatially across the cortex. While these NREM sleep features are thought to be largely independently regulated, there is also evidence that they are mechanistically coupled. To investigate how cortical NREM sleep features are controlled, we examined the astrocytic network, comprising a cortex-wide syncytium that influences population-level neuronal activity. We quantified endogenous astrocyte activity in mice over natural sleep and wake, then manipulated specific astrocytic G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathways in vivo. We find that astrocytic Gi- and Gq-coupled GPCR signaling separately control NREM sleep depth and duration, respectively, and that astrocytic signaling causes differential changes in local and remote cortex. These data support a model in which the cortical astrocyte network serves as a hub for regulating distinct NREM sleep features.

Screening and Identification of Four Prognostic Genes Related to Immune Infiltration and G-Protein Coupled Receptors Pathway in Lung Adenocarcinoma

BackgroundLung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a common malignant tumor with the highest morbidity and mortality worldwide. The degree of tumor immune infiltration and clinical prognosis depend on immune-related genes, but their interaction with the tumor immune microenvironment, the specific mechanism driving immune infiltration and their prognostic value are still not very clear. Therefore, the aim of this work was focused on the elucidation of these unclear aspects.MethodsTCGA LUAD samples were divided into three immune infiltration subtypes according to the single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), in which the associated gene modules and hub genes were screened by weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA). Four key genes related to immune infiltration were found and screened by differential expression analysis, univariate prognostic analysis, and Lasso-COX regression, and their PPI network was constructed. Finally, a Nomogram model based on the four genes and tumor stages was constructed and confirmed in two GEO data sets.ResultsAmong the three subtypes—high, medium, and low immune infiltration subtype—the survival rate of the patients in the high one was higher than the rate in the other two subtypes. The four key genes related to LUAD immune infiltration subtypes were CD69, KLRB1, PLCB2, and P2RY13. The PPI network revealed that the downstream genes of the G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) pathway were activated by these four genes through the S1PR1. The risk score signature based on these four genes could distinguish high and low-risk LUAD patients with different prognosis. The Nomogram constructed by risk score and clinical tumor stage showed a good ability to predict the survival rate of LUAD patients. The universality and robustness of the Nomogram was confirmed by two GEO datasets.ConclusionsThe prognosis of LUAD patients could be predicted by the constructed risk score signature based on the four genes, making this score a potential independent biomarker. The screening, identification, and analysis of these four genes could contribute to the understanding of GPCRs and LUAD immune infiltration, thus guiding the formulation of more effective immunotherapeutic strategies.