Crop selection is a critical task that involves assessing multiple risk factors to achieve maximum yield. Therefore, risk assessment plays a pivotal role in choosing suitable crops for cultivation. Probabilistic and possibilistic methods are the two primary approaches used for the crop selection process. Probabilistic methods are cost-intensive due to data handling, while possibilistic methods, utilizing linguistic variables, are considered more reliable. In this article, we represent such linguistic variables using Quadripartitioned Single-Valued Neutrosophic Sets (QSVNSs), extensions of Single-Valued Neutrosophic Sets (SVNSs) characterized by four independent membership functions that enhance uncertainty accommodation. We propose two QSVNS-based information measures, entropy and similarity, to transform the final risks evaluated in the form of QSVNSs into linguistic variables for easier comprehension by the general audience. We apply this framework to mustard and paddy cultivation in Assam, a state located in northeastern India, conducting thorough analyses and validation tests. Additionally, statistical tests are presented to demonstrate the significance of the obtained results. The final risk of mustard cultivation is found to be ‘absolutely high’, as the largest similarity value of 0.9910 is obtained for the linguistic term ‘absolutely high’ among all computed similarity value results. Similarly, for paddy cultivation, the largest similarity value of 0.9159 is obtained for the linguistic term ‘very low’, indicating its final risk in our assumed scenario. Thus, the veracity and proficiency of our newly constructed measures are reflected in their practical applications.
Read full abstract