Fusion For Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Research Articles

Developing nonlinear k-nearest neighbors classification algorithms to identify patients at high risk of increased length of hospital stay following spine surgery.

Spondylolisthesis is a common operative disease in the United States, but robust predictive models for patient outcomes remain limited. The development of models that accurately predict postoperative outcomes would be useful to help identify patients at risk of complicated postoperative courses and determine appropriate healthcare and resource utilization for patients. As such, the purpose of this study was to develop k-nearest neighbors (KNN) classification algorithms to identify patients at increased risk for extended hospital length of stay (LOS) following neurosurgical intervention for spondylolisthesis. The Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) spondylolisthesis data set was queried for patients receiving either decompression alone or decompression plus fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Preoperative and perioperative variables were queried, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were performed to identify which variables would be included in the machine learning models. Two KNN models were implemented (k = 25) with a standard training set of 60%, validation set of 20%, and testing set of 20%, one with arthrodesis status (model 1) and the other without (model 2). Feature scaling was implemented during the preprocessing stage to standardize the independent features. Of 608 enrolled patients, 544 met prespecified inclusion criteria. The mean age of all patients was 61.9 ± 12.1 years (± SD), and 309 (56.8%) patients were female. The model 1 KNN had an overall accuracy of 98.1%, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 84.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.9%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. Additionally, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted for model 1, showing an overall area under the curve (AUC) of 0.998. Model 2 had an overall accuracy of 99.1%, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 92.3%, PPV of 99.0%, and NPV of 100%, with the same ROC AUC of 0.998. Overall, these findings demonstrate that nonlinear KNN machine learning models have incredibly high predictive value for LOS. Important predictor variables include diabetes, osteoporosis, socioeconomic quartile, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss during surgery, patient educational status, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, BMI, insurance status, smoking status, sex, and age. These models may be considered for external validation by spine surgeons to aid in patient selection and management, resource utilization, and preoperative surgical planning.

Effect of Clinical and Radiographic Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Classification on Patient-reported Outcomes and Spinopelvic Parameters for Patients With Single-level L4-L5 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis After Lumbar Fusion.

Retrospective cohort study. To determine whether preoperative clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis (CARDS) classification is associated with differences in patient-reported outcomes and spinopelvic parameters after posterior decompression and fusion for L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). The CARDS classification for lumbar DS, an alternative to the Meyerding system, considers additional radiographic findings such as disc space collapse and segmental kyphosis and stratifies DS into 4 radiographically distinct classes. Although CARDS has been shown to be a reliable and reproducible method for classifying DS, very few studies have assessed whether the CARDS types represent distinct clinical entities. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on patients with L4-L5 DS who underwent posterior lumbar decompression and fusion. Changes in spinopelvic alignment and patient-reported outcomes measures, including recovery ratios and percentage of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference, were compared among patients in each CARDS classification 1-year postoperatively using analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis H with Dunn post hoc analysis. Multiple linear regression determined whether CARDS groups significantly predicted patient-reported outcomes measures, lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) while controlling for demographic and surgical characteristics. Preoperative type B spondylolisthesis predicted decreased improvement in "physical component and mental component score of the short form-12" compared with type A spondylolisthesis (β-coefficient = -5.96, P = 0.031) at 1 year. Significant differences were found between CARDS groups with regards to ΔLL (A: -1.63 degrees vs B: -1.17 degrees vs C: 2.88 degrees vs D: 3.19 degrees, P = 0.010) and ΔPI-LL (A: 1.02 degrees vs B: 2.09 degrees vs C: -2.59 degrees vs D: -3.70 degrees, P = 0.012). Preoperative type C spondylolisthesis was found to predict increased LL (β-coefficient = 4.46, P = 0.0054) and decreased PI-LL (β-coefficient = -3.49, P = 0.025) at 1 year compared with type A spondylolisthesis. Clinical and radiographic outcomes differed significantly by preoperative CARDS classification type for patients undergoing posterior decompression and fusion for L4-L5 DS. Level III.

What's New in Spine Surgery.

What's New in Spine Surgery.

Defining Instability in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Surgeon Views.

Surgeon survey. To examine factors influencing surgeons' definition of instability in grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and assess treatment preferences for both stable and unstable DS. DS treatment options are broadly classified as decompression with or without fusion. In surgical decision-making, "instability" is frequently considered as a key factor. However, no consensus on the definition of instability exists. A survey was conducted to ascertain the minimum amounts of static translation, dynamic translation, and angulation change that surgeons considered significant for determining instability. The importance of other clinical and radiographic features were also assessed, and respondents' standard treatment for stable and unstable DS. Out of 226 respondents, 99% deemed dynamic translation moderately to extremely influential for determining instability, whereas only 55% found static translation as important. The most prevalent cut-off values for dynamic (57%) and static translation (32%) were at least 2-4 mm and for angulation change at least 10-15 degrees (43%). Facet angulation was considered moderately to extremely important to determine instability by 69% of the surgeons, disk height by 67%, patient age by 64%, severity of stenosis by 55%, severity of back pain by 50%, patient-reported function by 49%, pelvic incidence by 47%, and severity of neurogenic claudication by 42%.Decompression with fusion was the preferred treatment method for unstable DS in 99% of the respondents. For stable DS, 40% would still perform fusion, whereas 60% preferred treatment with decompression-alone. Those who preferred fusion for stable DS reported significantly lower thresholds for static (P<0.001) and dynamic translation (P=0.004) for their determination of instability. Clear consensus regarding the definition of instability does not exist. Dynamic translation is the most agreed-upon parameter of influence. Treatment preferences vary for stable DS, but for unstable cases there is broad consensus to perform fusion. Level II.

Factors Associated with 12-month Return to Work Following One-level Posterior Lumbar Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database

Abstract INTRODUCTION Return to work (RTW) has become an increasingly important metric of spinal surgery success. Lumbar spondylolisthesis is a relatively common spinal pathology that may manifest as low back pain and/or leg pain, causing functional disability and hindering patients from working and performing activities of daily living. Currently, there is a lack of nationwide data evaluating RTW in lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS We queried the Quality Outcomes Database for employed patients that underwent single-level posterior spinal fusion for Meyerding grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. We compared cases who returned to work within 12 mo with regard to baseline demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, and patient reported outcomes. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted for 12-mo RTW adjusting for an array of pre- and intraoperative variables. RESULTS A total of 163 patients with available 12-mo follow-up data (84%) were analyzed. Median age was 57 yr (interquartile range: 51-60 yr) and 57% were females (n = 93). On multivariable analysis, patients that were working at the time of surgery were significantly more likely to RTW compared to those that were not working (OR 4.62, 95% CI 1.42-15.07, P &lt; .001). In addition, college education (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.18-9.24, P = .02) was associated with significantly higher odds of returning to work compared to high-school or less education. The effect of postcollege education (OR 5.27, 95% CI 1.46-19.05, P = .01), baseline ODI score (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.34 - 1.21, P = .17) and smoking status (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.13-1.54, P = .20) were not found to be significant. Model c-statistic was 0.76. CONCLUSION Analysis of data from a national spinal registry revealed that employment status at the time of surgery and education level were the most significant predictors of 12-moh RTW for patients undergoing single-level posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. The findings of the present study may assist surgeons and patients with setting realistic treatment expectations during preoperative discussions.

Effect of Surgical Setting on Hospital-Reported Outcomes for Elective Lumbar Spinal Procedures: Tertiary Versus Community Hospitals.

Study Design:Retrospective cohort study.Objective:As hospital compensation becomes increasingly dependent on pay-for-performance and bundled payment compensation models, hospitals seek to reduce costs and increase quality. To our knowledge, no reported data compare these measures between hospital settings for elective lumbar procedures. The study compares hospital-reported outcomes and costs for elective lumbar procedures performed at a tertiary hospital (TH) versus community hospitals (CH) within a single health care system.Methods:Retrospective review of a physician-maintained, prospectively collected database consisting of 1 TH and 4 CH for 3 common lumbar surgeries from 2015 to 2016. Patients undergoing primary elective microdiscectomy for disc herniation, laminectomy for spinal stenosis, and laminectomy with fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis were included. Patients were excluded for traumatic, infectious, or malignant pathology. Comparing hospital settings, outcomes included length of stay (LOS), rates of 30-day readmissions, potentially preventable complications (PPC), and discharge to rehabilitation facility, and hospital costs.Results:A total of 892 patients (n = 217 microdiscectomies, n = 302 laminectomies, and n = 373 laminectomy fusions) were included. The TH served a younger patient population with fewer comorbid conditions and a higher proportion of African Americans. The TH performed more decompressions (P < .001) per level fused; the CH performed more interbody fusions (P = .007). Cost of performing microdiscectomy (P < .001) and laminectomy (P = .014) was significantly higher at the TH, but there was no significant difference for laminectomy with fusion. In a multivariable stepwise linear regression analysis, the TH was significantly more expensive for single-level microdiscectomy (P < .001) and laminectomy with single-level fusion (P < .001), but trended toward significance for laminectomy without fusion (P = .052). No difference existed for PPC or readmissions rate. Patients undergoing laminectomy without fusion were discharged to a facility more often at the TH (P = .019).Conclusions:We provide hospital-reported outcomes between a TH and CH. Significant differences in patient characteristics and surgical practices exist between surgical settings. Despite minimal differences in hospital-reported outcomes, the TH was significantly more expensive.

The Effect of Symptom Duration on Outcomes After Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

Study Design:Longitudinal comparative cohort.Objectives:To determine if the duration of symptoms in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis affects postoperative outcomes after 1- or 2-level decompression and fusion.Methods:Patients undergoing primary surgery for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis at a single Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) participating site were identified. Demographic, surgical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data, including baseline and 12-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), back pain (BP, 0-10), leg pain (LP, 0-10), and EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D) scores were collected. Individual medical records were reviewed for data on duration of symptoms prior to surgery. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts—those with preoperative symptom duration of less than 1 year, 1 to 2 years, or greater than 2 years.Results:Complete data was available in 123 patients. Significant improvement in ODI, BP, and LP scores were observed in all groups. At 12-month follow-up improvement in ODI, BP, or LP was similar among the cohorts; with a trend toward significance with better improvement in LP scores in patients with a symptom duration of less than 1 year to those with symptom duration greater than 2 years (P = .058).Conclusions:The duration of symptoms up to 2 years prior to surgery may not be a useful predictor of improvement of back pain or disability scores in patients with spondylolisthesis requiring decompression and fusion. Although there was a positive trend for improvement in leg pain for those with a shorter duration of symptoms, this did not reach statistical significance in our study.

Factors predicting opioid dependence in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: analysis from the MarketScan databases.

OBJECTIVE The opioid crisis is identified as a national emergency and epidemic in the United States. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with opioid dependence in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). METHODS The authors queried MarketScan databases to investigate the factors affecting postsurgery opioid use in patients with DS between 2000 and 2012. The outcome of interest was opioid dependence, which was defined as continued opioid use, > 10 opioid prescriptions, or diagnosis of or prescription for opioid dependence disorder in the period of 1 year before or 3-15 months after the procedure. Comparisons of outcomes were performed using nonparametric 2-group tests and generalized regression models. RESULTS A cohort of 10,708 patients was identified from the database. The median patient age was 61 years (interquartile range 54-69 years), and 65.1% were female (n = 6975). A majority of patients had decompression with fusion (n = 10,068; 94%) and underwent multilevel procedures (n = 8123; 75.9%). Of 10,708 patients, 14.85% (n = 1591) were identified as having opioid dependence within 12 months prior to the index surgical procedure and 9.90% (n = 1060) were identified as having opioid dependence within 3-15 months after the procedure. Of all the variables, prior opioid dependence (OR 16.29, 95% CI 14.10-18.81, p < 0.001) and younger age (1-year increase in age: OR 0.972, 95% CI 0.963-0.980, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of opioid dependence following surgery for DS. The use of fusion was not associated with opioid dependence following the procedure (p = 0.8396). Following surgery for DS, patients were more likely to become opioid independent than they were to become opioid dependent (8.54% vs 3.58%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients underwent fusion for DS. Surgical decompression with fusion was not associated with increased risk of postsurgery opioid dependence in patients with DS. Overall, opioid dependence was reduced by 4.96% after surgery for DS. Prior opioid dependence is associated with increased risk and increasing age is associated with decreased risk of opioid dependence following surgery for DS.

Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

A questionnaire survey. To report the current use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in lumbar fusion procedures for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), and identify associated factors including fusion technique, surgeon location, surgeon specialty, or surgeon practice model. The prevalence of rhBMP-2 use in fusions increased dramatically from 0.7% in 2002 to 24.7% in 2006, however more recent studies have identified significant complications with its use. Furthermore, an independent review of the industry-sponsored trial data has demonstrated no significant difference in fusion rates or clinical results with the use of rhBMP-2 compared with iliac-crest autograft. In July 2014, a survey was sent requesting information on the usage of rhBMP-2 in the treatment of DS. Determinants included the fusion technique, geographic location, specialty, and associated practice models. No funding was received for this work. Overall, 7.8% +/- 2.0% of surgeons reported using rhBMP-2 when performing an open L4-L5 posterolateral fusion for DS; 6.2% +/- 1.8% reported using rhBMP-2 for an open L4-L5 interbody fusion, and 12.1% +/- 2.5% reported using rhBMP-2 for a L4-L5 minimally invasive (MIS) interbody fusion. The variables that were statistically associated with the use of rhBMP-2 were North America surgeons (P < 0.0001) and the type of procedure (P = 0.0005). Compared with historical data, there has been a dramatic decrease in the number of surgeons using rhBMP-2 in lumbar fusion procedures for the treatment of DS. Currently, rhBMP-2 is more commonly used by surgeons in North America and those performing MIS interbody fusions. N/A.

Long-term Results Regarding the Instability of Decompressive Surgery without Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

The long-term results of decompressive surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) were evaluated with reference to instability. Patients (n=48) undergoing decompressive surgery without fusion were studied. The diagnosis of spondylolisthesis was made based on the presence of sagittal vertebral slippage greater than 3mm. Instability was defined as translation more than 2mm on lateral functional radiography. Surgical interventions were divided into two groups: bilateral laminotomy (n=25)and laminectomy (n=23). Clinical results were evaluated according to the McCulloch's classification and Japanese Orthopedic Association(JOA)score. Of 48 patients, 25 showed preoperative instability. Eleven patients showed both pre-and postoperative instability. The mean pre-and postoperative slippages were 7.5 and 7.6mm, respectively. Of 23 patients without preoperative instability, nine developed postoperative instability. In this group, slippage changed from 6.2 to 6.1mm. Instability was not related to slippage progression. Surgical results of patients undergoing laminotomy were superior to those undergoing laminectomy. The mean pre-and postoperative JOA scores and recovery rate were 14.5, 20.9, and 63.1 in instability group patients with laminotomy and 15.6, 23.2, and 59.0 in the non-instability group, respectively. Surgical results were similar and not related to preoperative instability. Low back pain (LBP) showed no correlation to the degree of slippage, instability, and surgery type. LBP improved in each group. Instability, defined by vertebral translation on lateral functional radiography, did not affect the surgical results of patients with DS treated with laminotomy.

Long-term results of decompressive surgery without fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis

The long-term results of decompressive surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis were evaluated retrospectively with regard to the postoperative progression of slippage and clinical symptoms. The study included 53 patients who underwent surgery, and for whom follow-up of at least 5 years was conducted. Spondylolisthesis was diagnosed based on the presence of sagittal vertebral translation greater than 3mm on lateral radiographs. The patients were divided into two groups:Group I:37 patients undergoing bilateral laminotomy, and Group II:16 patients undergoing laminectomy. The clinical results were evaluated according to McCulloch's classification and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)score. The mean pre-and postoperative JOA scores were 14.6 and 22.9 in Group I and 14.7 and 21.0 in Group II, respectively. The JOA scores improved soon after surgery, after which the scores declined gradually in both groups. The recovery rate was 63.0% in Group I and 43.7% in Group II. The average amount of pre- and postoperative slippage was 7.3mm and 6.9mm in Group I and 6.2mm and 6.9mm in Group II, respectively. In Group I, the slippage progressed within the first year, after which the degree of slippage slowly decreased to lower values than those observed preoperatively, whereas slippage progressed for 5 years before declining in Group II. No correlations were observed between progression of slippage and clinical outcomes in either group. Laminotomy produces satisfactory long-term results both clinically and radiographically in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment for degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis.

Systematic review. To identify cost-effective treatment strategies for lumbar spine degenerative diseases. There is a paucity of literature assisting physicians and society regarding the cost-efficiency of management of lumbar spine conditions. Limited articles on selective operative and nonoperative therapies have been published for a variety of lumbar conditions. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration data base, University of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (National Health Services Economic Evaluation Database and health technology assessment), and the Tufts CEA Registry was conducted through December 16, 2013. Three specific questions were addressed for adult patients: (1) What is the evidence that surgery is cost-effective compared with nonsurgical management for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis or stenosis? (2) What is the evidence that fusion is cost-effective compared with no fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis or stenosis? and (3) What is the evidence that instrumentation is cost-effective compared with none for degenerative spondylolisthesis? The Quality of Health Economic Studies instrument was used to provide an initial basis for critical appraisal of included economic studies. Articles were further refined with individual review based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Initial search resulted in 122 potentially relevant citations, 115 of which were excluded at title and abstract levels and 3 at full-text reviews, leaving 5 for analysis. No non-English language text met inclusion/exclusion criteria. All studies illustrated a clinical benefit of surgical treatment as measured by quality-adjusted life year (0.11-8.05). Surgical treatments had a greater financial cost than nonoperative care ($5883-$26,035). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio calculations noted operative treatment over nonoperative treatment for spondylolisthesis ($59,487-$115,600) per quality-adjusted life year. However, cost for patients without spondylolisthesis varied greatly from nonoperative treat dominating to $77,600 per quality-adjusted life year favoring surgery. Because the articles had heterogeneous methods and patient population, conclusion differed greatly on cost assessment. Limited quality data exist on cost-effective treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal conditions, despite more recent interest related to this topic. It is important that future research efforts focus on constructing higher quality trials in this area to help determine the most cost-effective care. 3.

Instrumented fusion surgery in elderly patients (over 75 years old): clinical and radiological results in a series of 53 patients

To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of elderly (>75 years old) patients who underwent spinal instrumented fusion surgery. Patients underwent lumbar pedicle screw fixation and fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed. 53 patients were studied. Pre-operative VAS was 7.8, ODI was 47.6 %. 254 screws were placed (36 single level; 13 double levels and 4 cases three-levels). No mortality occurred. At 18 months follow-up VAS was 4.1, ODI was 21.8 %. A stable fusion was observed in 41 patients (78.8 %); in four cases there was minimal sign of instability and seven patients underwent a second surgery due to screw mobilization. Spinal fixation and fusion in patients older than 75 years old grants good results in terms of quality of life but the rate of morbidity is higher than standard spine surgery. Rate of fusion especially is still a critical point.

Can Preoperative Radiographic Parameters Be Used to Predict Fusion in Non-instrumented Posterolateral Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?

Can Preoperative Radiographic Parameters Be Used to Predict Fusion in Non-instrumented Posterolateral Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?

Health Related Quality of Life Following Decompression Compared to Decompression and Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Canadian Multicenter Study

Health Related Quality of Life Following Decompression Compared to Decompression and Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Canadian Multicenter Study

The Effect of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion After Posterolateral Fusion in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Purpose: To determine the necessity of an additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) after a posterolateral fusion (PLF) for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). Materials and Methods: A retrospective study, after a minimum follow-up of 2 years was conducted on forty patients who underwent a single level decompression and instrumented fusion for DS with spinal stenosis at the L4-5 level. A PLF was performed in 21 patients, and a circumferential fusion (CF) with an additional PLIF in 19 patients. According to the fusion methods and preoperative segmental mobility, the patients were divided into four groups; s-PLF group (PLF in the stable group, n=13), s-PLIF group (CF in the stable group, n=11), u-PLF group (PLF in the unstable group, n=8), and u-PLIF group (CF in the unstable group n=8). Clinical and radiographic comparisions between the PLF and PLIF groups were performed. Results: The mean decrements of Oswestry Disability Index (Visual Analog Scale) scores were 29% (5.5), 29% (5.9), 22% (2.6) and 42% (5.9) respectively for the s-PLF, s-PLIF, u-PLF and u-PLIF groups, and a statistical difference was found only between the u-PLF and u-PLIF groups (ODI: p=0.032, VAS: p=0.004). Fusion rates were 92%, 100%, 88% and 100% respectively. The mean slip angle increments were serially 2.5, -3.1, -1.5 and -0.3, and the mean percent slip decrements were 6.7%, 8.7%, 5.1% and 3.7%, and the mean disc height increments were -0.4 mm, 1.8 mm, 0.5 mm and 3.0 mm, and the mean lumbar lordosis increments were 8.6 4.7, -1.9 and 1.9 and the mean sacral tilt increments were 3.8, 3.4, -1.3 and 0.9. Statistical differences were found only between the s-PLF and s-PLIF groups in slip angle increments (p=0.029) and between the s-PLF and s-PLIF groups (p=0.043) and between the u-PLF and u-PLIF groups (p=0.042) in disc height increments. Conclusion: PLF alone provided successful clinical outcome in stable group, but CF provided better clinical outcomes in the unstable groups. This study suggests that preoperative segmental mobility may be a criterion to determine whether or not an additional PLIF is necessary in the treatment of lumbar DS.

Patient Outcomes After Decompression and Instrumented Posterior Spinal Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

A retrospective study of patient outcomes after decompression and fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis, using the SF-36 survey and a functional questionnaire. In recent studies, patient outcomes have been examined more specifically; however, detailed functional outcomes are not available nor have widely used outcomes instruments been administered. Thirty patients aged more than 40 years (average, 60.1 years) who had degenerative spondylolisthesis were evaluated after decompression and instrumented posterior fusion. Charts and radiographs were also reviewed. Questionnaires were administered by telephone, and consisted of the Medical Outcomes Study short form (SF-36) and 27 questions designed to evaluate function, quality of life, medication usage, and satisfaction with surgical results. Ninety-three percent of patient's were satisfied with their outcomes. Patients improved significantly in their ability to perform heavy and light activities, participate in social activities, sit, and sleep (P < 0.001) and also improved in pain, depression, and medication usage (P < 0.0001). SF-36 data showed significantly better overall assessment of health in all categories than that in a published cohort of patients with low back pain. The current study group also showed no difference in seven of eight categories when compared with the general population. Fusion rate was 93% at an average of 128 days. Three patients required reoperation: two for pseudarthrosis and one for a deep infection. A poorer outcome, scored by the SF-36, was associated with greater preoperative stenosis (P < 0.05) or occurrence of a complication (P < 0.05). Patients treated with decompression and fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis had improved functional outcomes, when measured by a disease-specific questionnaire and by widely used instruments.

Point of View: Patient Outcomes After Decompression and Instrumented Posterior Spinal Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Point of View: Patient Outcomes After Decompression and Instrumented Posterior Spinal Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis