Fusion Cell Vaccination Research Articles

A novel anti-CTLA-4 nanobody-IL12 fusion protein in combination with a dendritic cell/tumour fusion cell vaccine enhances the antitumour activity of CD8+ T cells in solid tumours.

We previously developed a nanobody targeting CTLA-4 and demonstrated that it can boost antitumour T-cell responses in vitro; however, the resulting responses after the injection of T cells into cancer models are usually weak and transient. Here, we explored whether fusing our nanobody to IL-12 would enable it to induce stronger, longer-lasting T-cell immune responses after exposure to immature dendritic cell and tumour cell fusions. The fusion protein enhanced the response of CD8+ T cells to tumour antigens in vitro and led to stronger, more persistent immune responses after the T cells were injected into mice bearing different types of xenografts. Our in vitro and in vivo results suggest the anticancer potential of our nanobody-interleukin fusion system and support the clinical application of this fusion approach for various nanobodies.

Safety Evaluation and Preliminary Flow Cytometrical Analysis in Dogs With Oral Melanoma Treated with An Immunotherapeutic Dendritic Cell Fusion Vaccine and Concurrent Radiotherapy

Safety Evaluation and Preliminary Flow Cytometrical Analysis in Dogs With Oral Melanoma Treated with An Immunotherapeutic Dendritic Cell Fusion Vaccine and Concurrent Radiotherapy

Immunotherapeutic allogeneic dendritic cell and autologous tumor cell fusion vaccine alone or combined with radiotherapy in canine oral malignant melanoma is safe and potentially effective.

Immunotherapy represents a promising breakthrough in cancer management and is being explored in canine melanomas. Dendritic cells (DCs) play a crucial role in priming T-cell-mediated immune reactions through the antigen-presenting function. Combining immunotherapy and radiation therapy may generate more substantial anti-cancer efficacy through immunomodulation. Our research reported a preliminary result of the safety and outcome of a kind of immunotherapy, the allogeneic dendritic cell and autologous tumor cell fusion vaccine, alone or in combination with hypofractionated radiation therapy, in canine oral malignant melanoma. Two groups of dogs with histopathological diagnoses of oral malignant melanoma were recruited. In group 1 (DCRT), dogs received a combination of DC fusion vaccine and radiotherapy. In group 2 (DC), dogs received DC fusion vaccine alone. DC vaccination was given once every 2 weeks for four doses. Radiotherapy was performed weekly for five fractions. Dogs that received carboplatin were retrospectively collected as a control group (group 3). Five dogs were included in group 1 (two stage II, three stage III), 11 in group 2 (three stage I/II, eight stage III/IV), and eight (two stage I/II, six stage III/IV) in the control group. Both DC and DCRT were well-tolerated, with only mild adverse events reported, including mucositis, gastrointestinal discomfort, and injection site reactions. The median progression-free intervals in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 214 (95% CI, NA, due to insufficient data), 100 (95% CI, 27-237), and 42 days (95% CI, NA-170), respectively, which were not significantly different. The 1-year survival rates were 20, 54.5, and 12.5% in groups 1, 2, and 3. Dogs in the DCRT group exhibited significantly higher TGF-β signals than the DC group throughout the treatment course, indicating a possible higher degree of immunosuppression. The manuscript demonstrated the safety of dendritic cell/tumor cell fusion vaccine immunotherapy, alone or in combination with radiotherapy. The results support further expansion of this immunotherapy, modification of combination treatment and protocols, and investigation of combining DC vaccine with other treatment modalities. Preclinical Trials, PCTE0000475.

Phase 1 Trial of Dendritic Cell/AML Fusion Cell Vaccine after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Introduction We have developed a vaccine in which patient-derived AML cells are fused with donor-derived dendritic cells (DCs). Vaccination after initial remission and consolidation was shown to elicit leukemia-specific immune responses. We hypothesized that donor-derived DC/AML vaccination post-transplant would elicit the durable expansion of leukemia-specific T cells within the donor T cell repertoire to effectively protect against disease relapse. We report updated results of a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03679650) evaluating the use of DC/AML fusion vaccine following allogeneic transplant. Methods DC/AML fusion vaccine was generated with patient leukemia blasts, cryopreserved at the time of diagnosis, and donor-derived DCs, from leukapheresis of patients who achieved hematopoietic recovery and remained in CR 25-90 days after an allogeneic transplant. DCs were differentiated via culture of adherent mononuclear cells in the presence of GM-CSF, IL-4 and TNFa. Vaccine was administered starting day 70-100 post-transplant as long as the patient did not have active GVHD requiring therapy. Two doses of the vaccine were given subcutaneously at 3 week intervals, in conjunction with 100 mcg GMCSF daily at the vaccine site for 4 days. A booster vaccine was given 30-60 days following the taper of immune suppression, in the absence of GVHD. Longitudinal profiling of the immune landscape by single cell RNA sequencing and CyTOF from peripheral blood samples obtained before and after vaccination is underway. Immunologic response of leukemia-specfic T cells is being evaluated via IFN-gamma expression following stimulation with autologous tumor lysate. OS was calculated using Kaplan Meier Curve. Results 27 participants have been enrolled with median age 59 years (range 23-74). 15 patients were transplanted with a matched unrelated donor, 10 with a matched sibling donor and two with a haplo-identical donor. One patient relapsed prior to leukapheresis and was ineligible. The median yield of leukemia cells was 218x10 6 (range 62-818x10 6)and mean viability was 97%. The median yield of DCs was 106x10 6 (range 19-182x10 6) and mean viability 81%. Fusion vaccine was successfully generated in 25 of 26 patients who underwent leukapheresis; one patient had insufficient DC. Mean fusion efficiency was 47% with viability of 79%. Mean fusion vaccine dose was 3.8 x10 6 cells. 6 patients from whom vaccine was generated did not meet eligibility to initiate vaccination due to GVHD or COVID19 infection. 19 participants initiated vaccine administration and are evaluable for toxicity and immunologic response. The most common side effects were vaccine site reactions (n=10 grade 1, n=2 grade 2). 5 patients developed GVHD that was attributed as possibly related to vaccination, at a median time of 17 days after vaccination (range 5-70 days). Acute GVHD included two events of skin grade 2, one GI grade 2, one liver and skin grade 3. Chronic GVHD included a moderate event affecting 3 organs and severe event affecting 4 organs. There were 10 additional GVHD events with a median time of 108 days post vaccination (range 7-126 days), assessed as unlikely related or unrelated to vaccine based on pre-existing GVHD and timing of onset. Median time of follow-up is 23 months post-transplant (range 11-59 months). Amongst 19 vaccinated patients, 14 remained in CR and median overall survival estimate is 49 months post transplant. 3 died of relapsed disease, 2 died of GVHD and/or infection, and 1 died of unknown cause. Preliminary results of PB CyTOF from 4 patients in remission and 1 patient that relapsed indicate higher proportions of T cells and DCs in patients in CR. Interferon expression was higher in a patient with durable remission while absent from a patient with early relapse. Conclusions Vaccination using host-derived leukemia cells and donor derived DC was safe and feasible. Adverse events post vaccination have included injection site reactions as well as acute and chronic graft versus host disease. Vaccination may be a promising strategy to reduce relapse as 14 of 19 vaccinated patients remain relapse free. Albeit this approach is limited to patients who have not had early relapse or early GVHD. Immunologic response by interferon release upon lysate stimulation, CyTOF and single cell RNA sequencing of the immune milieu will be reported.

Abstract 6785: Dendritic cell/myeloma fusion vaccine with lenalidomide maintenance following autologous hematopoietic cell transplant induced T cell activation and expansion

Abstract Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM), a clonal disorder of terminally differentiated plasma cells, is the second most common hematologic malignancy with ~57.9% 5-year survival rate. Current MM therapies are not curative and in most patients MM relapse. Aiming to restore antitumor immunity and counteract MM evolution, we have developed a personalized dendritic(DC)/MM cell fusion vaccine, whereby several tumor antigens are presented in the context of DC mediated co-stimulation. BMT CTN 1401 is a multicenter randomized phase II clinical trial (NCT02728102) evaluating the efficacy of the DC/MM vaccine combined with lenalidomide maintenance (Len) after autoHCT. 203 patients were enrolled from 18 centers. Aim: To evaluate the impact of the DC/MM vaccine on the establishment of anti-MM immune response we profiled the peripheral blood (PB) immune landscape at the single-cell level, with particular focus on the T cell compartment. Method: We performed single-cell immunoprofiling (gene expression + V(D)J sequencing) on 40 patients (3xDC/MM vaccine/Len/GM-CSF: N=20; Len/GM-CSF: N=10; Len: N=10). 160 PB mononuclear cells (PBMC) samples were collected at enrollment, prior to Len, after 1 and 3 vaccines and were processed using the 10x Genomics single cell 5' assay. Here we present the analysis relative to 52 PBMC samples from 13 vaccinated patients included in the initial study cohort. The remaining 108 PBMC samples have already been subjected to single-cell immunoprofiling and the analysis is ongoing. Results: 309,423 cells passed quality-check identifying 47 cell populations, corresponding to 20 major compartments. The T cell compartment (146,373 cells) was divided into 14 different cell populations including activated CD8, CD4, and NKT cells that exhibited a gradual increase during the course of the study. Relatively, TCR sequencing demonstrated a recovery of T cell clonal diversity and a progressive rise in the frequency of expanded clonotypes within the activated CD4 and cytotoxic T cell populations after vaccination. Consistently, we observed a progressively raised number of shared TCR clonotypes within the activated CD8 and CD4 T cell subsets. The identification of common epitope/paratope hotspots among the expanded clonotypes and the different patients revealed a higher proportion of shared TCR clonotype groups across patients after vaccination compared to the early post-transplant period, predominantly after 3 vaccinations. Conclusions: Assessment of PBMC samples from 13 vaccinated patients provided a detailed picture of the PBMC landscape. The constant T cell expansion in patients following vaccination coupled with the shared paratope/epitope hotspots and TCR signatures among patients indicated the TCR cross-reactivity and suggested for the establishment of an anti-MM immune response. Citation Format: Giulia Cheloni, Dimitra Karagkouni, Daniela Torres, David J. Chung, Nina Shah, Natalie S. Callander, Thinle Chodon, Yvonne Efebera, Nancy Geller, Peiman Hematti, Hillard Lazarus, Ehsan Malek, Philip L. McCarthy, Ajay K. Nooka, Jacalyn Rosenblatt, Aaron P. Rapoport, Robert J. Soiffer, Dina Stroopinsky, Edmund K. Waller, Marcelo C. Pasquini, Ioannis Vlachos, David Avigan. Dendritic cell/myeloma fusion vaccine with lenalidomide maintenance following autologous hematopoietic cell transplant induced T cell activation and expansion [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6785.

Enhancement of polyethylene glycol-cell fusion efficiency by novel application of transient pressure using a jet injector.

Cell-cell fusion involves the fusion of somatic cells into a single hybrid cell. It is not only a physiological process but also an important cell engineering technology which can be applied to various fields, such as regenerative medicine, antibody engineering, genetic engineering, and cancer therapy. There are three major methods of cell fusion: electrical cell fusion, polyethylene glycol (PEG) cell fusion, and virus-mediated cell fusion. Although PEG cell fusion is the most economical approach and does not require expensive instrumentation, it has a poor fusion rate and induces a high rate of cell cytotoxicity. To improve the fusion rate of the PEG method, we combined it with the pyro-drive jet injector (PJI). PJI provides instant pressure instead of cell agitation to increase the probability of cell-to-cell contact and shorten the distance between cells in the process of cell fusion. Here, we report that this improved fusion method not only decreased cell cytotoxicity during the fusion process, but also increased fusion rate compared with the conventional PEG method. Furthermore, we tested the functionality of cells fused using the PJI-PEG method and found them to be comparable to those fused using the conventional PEG method in terms of their application for dendritic cell (DC)-tumor cell fusion vaccine production; in addition, the PJI-PEG method demonstrated excellent performance in hybridoma cell preparation. Taken together, our data indicate that this method improves cell fusion efficiency as compared to the PEG method and thus has the potential for use in various applications that require cell fusion technology.

A dendritic/tumor fusion cell vaccine enhances efficacy of nanobody-based CAR-T cells against solid tumor.

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is practical in treating cancers of hematopoietic origin, but of that in solid tumors compromises efficacy for the loss of the antigen recognized by the CAR. However, dendritic cell (DC)/tumor fusion vaccines present a spectrum of known or unknown tumor antigens to stimulate T cell expansion and enhanced T cell response. Developing a new strategy of enhanced nanobody-based CAR-T (Nb-CAR-T) cells antitumor activity by DC/tumor fusion vaccines stimulation would provide guidance for more effective CAR-T cell therapies. Methods: Considering the therapeutic potential of nanobody (Nb), we first screened EGFRvIII Nb, then constructed and verified the function of EGFRvIII Nb-CAR-T cells in vitro and in vivo. We further combined DC/tumor fusion vaccines to boost EGFRvIII Nb-CAR-T cells antitumor effect, which was evaluated in vitro Nb-CAR-T cell function and in the tumor-bearing xenograft mouse models. Results: We had for the first time successfully selected EGFRvIII Nb for the generation of the novel EGFRvIII Nb-CAR-T cells. Importantly, our results suggested that DC/tumor fusion vaccines stimulate Nb-CAR-T cells response not only in improving T cell proliferation, T cell activation, cytokine secretion and tumor-specific cytotoxicity in vitro, but also significantly reducing tumor burden, prolonging survival and improving Nb-CAR-T cells infiltration. Conclusions: We have innovatively shown that DC/tumor fusion vaccines significantly enhance the efficacy of Nb-CAR-T cells against solid tumors. This new strategy has provided a promising therapeutic platform for promoting the clinical treatment of CAR-T cells therapy.

158 - Post-Transplant Vaccination with a Personalized Dendritic Cell/AML Fusion Cell Vaccine for Prevention of Relapse

158 - Post-Transplant Vaccination with a Personalized Dendritic Cell/AML Fusion Cell Vaccine for Prevention of Relapse

Post-Transplant Vaccination with a Personalized Dendritic Cell/AML Fusion Cell Vaccine for Prevention of Relapse

Post-Transplant Vaccination with a Personalized Dendritic Cell/AML Fusion Cell Vaccine for Prevention of Relapse

Vaccination with a Personalized Dendritic Cell/AML Fusion Cell Vaccine Following Allogeneic Transplantation in a Phase 1 Clinical Trial

Vaccination with a Personalized Dendritic Cell/AML Fusion Cell Vaccine Following Allogeneic Transplantation in a Phase 1 Clinical Trial

Development of Novel Second Generation DC/Tumor Fusion Vaccine in Lymphoma

Introduction: We have pioneered a personalized cancer vaccine in which patient derived tumor cells are fused with autologous dendritic cells (DCs) such that a broad array of shared and neo-tumor antigens is presented in the context of DC mediated co-stimulation, limiting the risk of antigen escape. In clinical trials of patients with hematologic malignancies, vaccination with DC/tumor fusions induced an expansion of tumor-specific T cells, and resulted in prolonged remissions in a subset of patients. In the current study, we have developed a novel second generation vaccine, whereby a DC/lymphoma fusion vaccine is presented in the context of a unique biomatrix that expresses high levels of the 41BB costimulatory molecule, to further accentuate T cell activation and prevent the establishment of tumor tolerance. In this study, we demonstrate efficacy of DC/lymphoma fusion cell vaccination in a preclinical lymphoma model, and show enhanced potency of the second-generation vaccine. Methods/Results: We first demonstrated the potency of the DC/tumor fusion vaccine in generating anti-tumor immunity in the A20 lymphoma model. Murine DC/A20 fusions were generated from bone marrow derived mononuclear cells cultured with GM-CSF and IL-4 then fused to syngeneic A20 lymphoma cells. DC/A20 fusion cells effectively induced tumor specific immunity as manifested by potent lysis of A20 T cells in vitro as compared to unstimulated T cells in a standard CTL assay. Consistent with this observation, vaccination with DC/A20 fusions effectively induced lymphoma specific immunity in an immunocompetent murine model. Balb/C mice (30 animals) underwent IV inoculation with 750,000 syngeneic, luciferase and mCherry transduced, A20 cells. 24 hours after tumor cells challenge, 15 mice were treated subcutaneously with 105 DC/A20 fusions. Tumor burden was detected using BLI imaging. 10 days post inoculation, within the untreated cohort all 15/15 mice had detectable tumor whereas within the treated group, 5 mice did not demonstrate any evidence of disease and 5 mice demonstrated minimal disease. We subsequently demonstrated that patient derived autologous DC/lymphoma fusions stimulated T cell mediated lysis of primary lymphoma cells. DC were generated from patient derived peripheral blood mononuclear cells cultured with GM-CSF and IL-4 and matured with TNFa. Primary lymphoma cells were isolated from resected tumor and fused with DC at a ratio of 10:1. Fusion stimulated T cells potently lysed autologous tumor cells as compared to unstimulated T cells (25.7% as compared to 12.66%) in a standard CTL assay. To further enhance vaccine potency, we developed a biomatrix substrate expressing the costimulatory molecule 41BB. Using carbodiimide chemistry we covalently bonded RGD peptide and 41BBL protein to an alginate (Alg)-based scaffold. The Alg/RGD/41BBL scaffold can serve as a supporting microenvironment for the co-culture of T cells and fusion vaccine. We cultured syngeneic T cells with DC/A20 fusion vaccine within a scaffold with or without bound 41BBL and examined the T cells cytotoxicity by a CTL assay as described above. Vaccine mediated stimulation of T cells in the context of the Alg/RGD/41BBL scaffold demonstrated higher levels of tumor lysis as compared to the percent T cells cultured within an Alg/RGD scaffold (22.95% and 13.95% respectively). Conclusion: In the current study we assessed the efficacy of the DC/Lymphoma fusion vaccine to elicit a tumor specific immune response. We succeeded in demonstrating the capacity of DC/Lymphoma fusion vaccine to generate tumor specific T cell cytotoxicity in vitro as well as in vivo in an immunocompetent murine model. Accordingly, we presented patient derived primary tumor results supporting the applicable nature of the DC/Lymphoma vaccine in lymphoma patients. In addition, we developed a second-generation fusion vaccine comprised of the original DC/Tumor vaccine presented to the T cells in an Alg/RGD/41BBL scaffold acting as a nurturing microenvironment for T cell immune specific response against the tumor cells. Our initial results exhibit promising potential and an in vivo experiment with the second-generation fusion vaccine is ongoing. Disclosures Arnason: Celgene/Juno: Consultancy; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Kufe:Nanogen Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genus Oncology: Equity Ownership; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria; Hillstream BioPharma: Equity Ownership; Victa BioTherapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Canbas: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rosenblatt:Dava Oncology: Other: Education; BMS: Research Funding; Partner Tx: Other: Advisory Board; Merck: Other: Advisory Board; Parexel: Consultancy; Imaging Endpoint: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Other: Advisory Board ; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board. Avigan:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Partners Tx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Partner Tx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Parexel: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy.

Allogenic γδ T cell and tumor cell fused vaccine for enhanced immunotherapeutic efficacy of osteosarcoma

Human γδ T cells have displayed their potential in cancer immunity through efficient tumor killing activities. Besides, they are also known for their capacity of antigen presentation. How to improve γδ T cells' immunotherapeutic effect as the cell vaccine is still a great challenge. Herein, we explore the human γδ T cells and tumor cell fused vaccine for enhanced immunotherapeutic efficacy of osteosarcoma. The fusion cell vaccine was prepared by chemical fusion between human γδ T cells and inactive osteosarcoma Saos-2 cells. The fusion process was confirmed by microscopy observation, and flow cytometry analysis further validated the antigen presenting functions of the fusion cells. Moreover, the immunotherapeutic potential of the fusion cells was then verified via cytotoxicity assay and cytokine release detection. Our study provided novel immunotherapeutic strategy for patients with osteosarcoma, which merits further practice in the near future.

A Decade of Anti-Myeloma Vaccine Development through Early Phase Trials: A Systematic Review

Introduction:Rationale for anticancer vaccine therapy is based on humoral and/or cellular response against unique tumor antigens (Ag). Peptide vaccines specific for Ag are under investigation for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Among cell-based vaccines, monocyte derived dendritic cell (MDDC) fused with myeloma cells serve as Ag presenting cells to develop an immune response against a variety of targets. The purpose of this study is to report clinical response and tolerability of anti-myeloma vaccines.Methods:We included phase I and I/II trials developed between January 2008 to December 2017, where vaccines or viruses were used against MM, irrespective of the geo-location, age, and sex. We performed a comprehensive literature search (last update 3-30-2018) using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, AdisInsight, and Clinicaltrials.gov.Results:The initial search identified 2537 early phase studies. After screening by 2 reviewers and categorization by mechanism of action, 25 clinical trials (CT) that involved vaccines and/or viruses were included. We added 1 CT after the manual search.Therapy was given to 3 distinct classes of patients: patients without prior treatment (high risk smoldering MM or stage I MM, 4 CT), as an adjunct therapy for patients undergoing FDA approved treatments [high dose chemotherapy (HDT), allogeneic (allo-SCT) or autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), 9 CT], and patients with residual or relapsed/refractory (RR) disease after FDA approved therapies (11 CT). Of the included 25 CT, 14 have published results available for analysis.For patients without prior treatments, PVX-410, a multi-peptide vaccine, resulted in at least minimal response (MR) in 50% of patients when combined with lenalidomiden and achieved stable disease (SD) for 60% of patients when used alone at 12 months follow up. Treatment with Idiotype-pulsed mature MMDC targeting idiotype proteins in MM showed MR in 30% of patients and SD in 43% of patients at 12 months.For patients receiving vaccines as an adjuvant treatment, recMAGE-A3 resulted in complete response (CR) and very good partial response (VGPR) in 46% and 54% respectively, at 3 months post ASCT follow up. By 12 months post ASCT, these responses were 38% CR and 23% VGPR. Treatment with MDDC (MAGE3 + Survivin + BCMA) resulted in SD in 42% of patients at a median of 25 months post vaccination and 55 months post ASCT. ScFv-FrC, a DNA fusion vaccine, resulted in CR in 50% and MR/SD in 21% at 52 weeks post vaccination. Ongoing CR/PR was maintained for 3+ years in 57 % patients, 4+ years in 36%, and 5+ years in 14% of patients following ASCT; OS was 64% after a median follow up of 85.6 months . Patients treated with MDDCs/tumor cells fusion vaccine had 69% SD after vaccination and 20% SD at a median of 26 months.When vaccines were given as a salvage therapy in RR MM, ImMucin vaccine showed a CR in 30% of patients during treatment, 20% maintained CR, and 13% had SD at a median of 24 months. Galinpepimut-S vaccine showed CR or very good partial response (VGPR) in 37% of patients at a median of 12 months, and 26% CR and VGPR at 18 months, with a progression free survival rate of 23.6 months. Patients receiving mHag loaded host MDDC vaccination also showed 8% CR for > 6 years (n=1) and 8% PR for 19 weeks (n=1); 33% had SD.Reolysin (wild-type reovirus), a virus-based vaccine, was used in 3 trials for RR MM patients. When alone, 42% of patients had SD and 58% had PD. When combined with dexamethasone and bortezomib 37% of patients had SD lasting for 3 cycles. Whereas, when combined with dexamethasone and carfilzomib, all patients had decrease in monoclonal proteins, with VGPR reported in 28%, PR in 43%, MR in 8%, and SD in 8% patients after 8 cycles.Most vaccines were well tolerated by patients, only grade (G) 1 and G2 side effects (SE), which were mostly flu-like symptoms and local skin reactions. G3 SE included pneumonia with mHag DC and Bcl2 peptide vaccine, GVHD with hTERT tumor vaccine, DVT and rash seen with scFv-FrC DNA vaccines. G4 SE were rare, but seen with reolysin, requiring 2 patients to be removed from study, and with DC/tumor cell fusion vaccine (1 pulmonary embolism).ConclusionAnti-myeloma vaccination therapy appears to be well tolerated, which makes it a promising adjuvant therapeutic agent against MM. Current data reveals positive immunologic activity in most patients and there is possibility of promising clinical responses with further drug development. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Progress of cellular and vaccine immunotherapy in multiple myeloma

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and donor lymphocyte infusion for multiple myeloma (MM) can induce graft-versus-myeloma immunity and long-term survival, but limited efficacy and associated toxicities have prevented its widespread application. Cellular immunotherapies and vaccines are explored to induce more specific, reliable, and potent antimyeloma immune responses with less treatment-related risk. Advances in molecular biology, basic and applied immunology, have led to several promising approaches such as genetically engineered T cells with chimeric antigen receptors and T-cell receptors targeting myeloma-specific epitopes, vaccine primed ex vivo expanded autologous T cells, expanded marrow-infiltrating lymphocytes, and plasma cell/dendritic cell fusion vaccines. The combination of these emerging therapies to immunomodulatory drugs and inhibitors of programmed death-1 T-cell regulatory pathways could improve the outcome for MM patients. This article reviews the latest progress of cellular and vaccine immunotherapy for MM at the 58th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting, and discusses how these therapies might integrate and synergize with existing treatment paradigms. Key words: Multiple myeloma; Cellular immunotherapy; Vaccine immunotherapy; American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting

Mouse IP-10 Gene Delivered by Folate-modified Chitosan Nanoparticles and Dendritic/tumor Cells Fusion Vaccine Effectively Inhibit the Growth of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Mice.

Dendritic cells (DC) and tumor cell fusion vaccine (DC/tumor cell fusion vaccine) is considered an effective approach in cancer biotherapy. However, its therapeutic effects in early clinical trials have been suboptimal partially due to the immunosuppressive tumor environment. In this study, we used nanoparticles of folate (FA)-modified chitosan, a non-viral vector capable of targeting tumor cells with high expression of FA receptors. FA-chitosan nanoparticles were used as biological carriers for the expression plasmid of the mouse interferon-induced protein-10 (mIP-10) gene, a potent chemoattractant for cytotoxic T cells. The combination of FA-chitosan/mIP-10 and DC/tumor cell fusion vaccine against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) effectively inhibited the growth of implanted HCC tumors and prolonged the survival of mice. The combination therapy significantly reduced myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) in mouse spleen, local tumor, and bone marrow while increasing tumor-specific IFN-γ responses. Furthermore, the combination therapy significantly inhibited tumor cell proliferation while promoting their apoptosis. Taken together, our data illustrate that the mIP-10 enhances the anti-tumor effect of DC/tumor cell fusion vaccine by alleviating the immunosuppressive tumor environment.

Individualized vaccination of AML patients in remission is associated with induction of antileukemia immunity and prolonged remissions.

We developed a personalized cancer vaccine in which patient-derived acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells are fused with autologous dendritic cells, generating a hybridoma that potently stimulates broad antitumor responses. We report results obtained from the first 17 AML patients, who achieved remission after chemotherapy and were then serially vaccinated to target minimal residual disease and prevent relapse. Vaccination was well tolerated and induced inflammatory responses at the site of administration, characterized by the dense infiltration of T cells. Vaccination was also associated with a marked rise in circulating T cells recognizing whole AML cells and leukemia-specific antigens that persisted for more than 6 months. Twelve of 17 vaccinated patients (71%; 90% confidence interval, 52 to 89%) remain alive without recurrence at a median follow-up of 57 months. The results demonstrate that personalized vaccination of AML patients in remission induces the expansion of leukemia-specific T cells and may be protective against disease relapse.

Cellular and vaccine immunotherapy for multiple myeloma.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and donor lymphocyte infusion for multiple myeloma (MM) can induce graft-versus-myeloma immunity and long-term survivorship, but limited efficacy and associated toxicities have prevented its widespread use. Cellular immunotherapies and vaccines seek to induce more specific, reliable, and potent antimyeloma immune responses with less treatment-related risk than is possible with allogeneic transplantation. Advances in molecular biology, and basic and applied immunology, have led to promising approaches such as genetically engineered T cells with chimeric antigen receptors and T-cell receptors targeting myeloma-specific epitopes, vaccine primed ex vivo expanded autologous T cells, expanded marrow-infiltrating lymphocytes, and plasma cell/dendritic cell fusion vaccines. The addition of these emerging therapies to immunomodulatory drugs and inhibitors of programmed death-1 T-cell regulatory pathways are poised to improve outcome for our patients with myeloma.

Blockade of PD-1 in Combination with Dendritic Cell/Myeloma Fusion Cell Vaccination Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Is Well Tolerated, Induces Anti-Tumor Immunity and May Lead to Eradication of Measureable Disease

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) offers a unique setting to incorporate immunotherapy in an effort to target residual disease. Our group has developed a cancer vaccine in which dendritic cells (DCs) are fused to autologous tumor cells resulting in the presentation of multiple tumor antigens with the capacity to elicit a broad anti-tumor response. A fundamental challenge to developing a more effective tumor vaccine is overcoming the immunosuppressive milieu by which tumor cells evade host immunity. Up-regulation of the PD-1/PDL1 pathway represents a key element contributing to tumor-mediated tolerance, and potentially muting response to vaccination. We are conducting a clinical trial in which patients with MM are treated with an anti-PD1 antibody (Pidilizumab, MDV9300) in combination with a dendritic cell/myeloma fusion cell vaccine following autologous transplantation. 22 patients have been treated with post-transplant immunotherapy. Mean age was 64. MM cells were isolated from bone marrow and were identified by expression of CD38 or CD138. Mean tumor cell yield was 118x106 cells. Adherent mononuclear cells were isolated from leukapheresis collections and cultured with GM-CSF and IL-4 for 5-7 days, then exposed to TNFα for 48-72 hours to generate mature DCs. DCs expressed co-stimulatory (mean CD86 75%) and maturation markers (mean CD83 50%). DC and MM cells were co-cultured with PEG and fusion cells were quantified by determining the percentage of cells that co-express unique DC and myeloma antigens. Mean fusion efficiency was 41% and the mean cell dose generated was 4 x 106 fusion cells. Mean viability of the DC, myeloma, and fusion preparations was 92%, 89%, and 85%, respectively. As a measure of their potency as antigen presenting cells, DC/MM fusions potently stimulate allogeneic T cell proliferation ex-vivo (Mean stimulation index of 1.9, 9.2 and 7.1 for tumor, DC and DC/myeloma fusions respectively, n=21) Post-transplant immunotherapy was initiated after recovery from transplant-related toxicities. Median time from transplant to initiation of post-transplant immunotherapy was 80 days. Patients received 3 doses of Pidilizumab at 6-week intervals. DC/myeloma fusion cells vaccination is administered 1 week before each dose of Pidilizumab. To date, 22 patients have completed vaccinations and Pidilizumab. Adverse events judged to be potentially treatment related included grade 1-2 diarrhea, arthralgias, myalgias, fatigue, headache, nausea, chills, transaminitis, cytopenia, elevated TSH, and vaccine site reactions. A significant increase in circulatingtumor reactive lymphocytes was noted following post-transplant immunotherapy, as determined by T cell expressionof IFN-γ by CD8 cells following ex-vivo co-culture withautologous myeloma cell lysate. Mean percentage of tumor reactiveCD8 cells increased from 1.8% post-transplant to a peak of 9.16% following immunotherapy. In the post-transplant period, regulatory T cells fell to minimal levels and remained low throughout the period of immunotherapy. 6 patients achieved a best response of VGPR, 6 patients have achieved a nCR/CR, including 3 who converted to CR following immunotherapy. Median PFS from transplant is 19 months with ongoing follow up. In summary, DC/MM fusion cell vaccination in conjunction with PD1 blockade following ASCT was well tolerated, potently induced anti-tumor immunity, and in a subset of patients, resulted in the eradication of post-transplant measurable disease. DisclosuresRichardson:Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laubach:Novartis: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Oncopep: Equity Ownership; Acetylon: Equity Ownership. Rowe:BioSight Ltd.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; BioLineRx Ltd.: Consultancy. Kufe:Genus Oncology: Consultancy, Equity Ownership.

DC/Aml Fusion Cell Vaccination Administered to AML Patients Who Achieve a Complete Remission Potently Expands Leukemia Reactive T Cells and Is Associated with Durable Remissions

We have developed an autologous whole cell leukemia vaccine, whereby patient derived leukemic blasts are fused to ex-vivo generated dendritic cells. In this way, a broad array of leukemia-associated antigens are presented in the context of DC mediated co-stimulation, resulting in the expansion of a polyclonal anti-leukemia immune response. We are conducting a clinical trial in which AML patients who are not candidates for allogeneic transplantation undergo vaccination with DC/AML fusion cells after achieving a complete remission. 56 patients underwent collection of AML cells for vaccine generation from either a bone marrow aspirate (N=38), 20cc of peripheral blood (N=15) or a leukapheresis product (N=3) at presentation with newly diagnosed (N=55) or first relapsed (N=1) AML. The mean yield of AML cells was 692 x 106 cells with a mean viability of 99%. Patients who did not achieve remission or who underwent allogeneic transplant in first remission came off study and did not complete vaccine generation. Eligible patients achieving CR who did not proceed to allogeneic transplant (N=21) underwent leukapheresis for DC generation and vaccine preparation. Adherent peripheral blood mononuclear cells were cultured in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4 for 5-7 days, and exposed to TNFα for 48-72 hours to generate mature DCs. Fusion cells were generated by co-culture of DCs with AML cells in the presence of 50% polyethylene glycol and identified as cells co-expressing antigens that were unique to the DC and tumor population. Mean fusion efficiency and viability was 42% and 87%, respectively. Vaccination with DC/leukemia fusion cells was initiated within 12 weeks from count recovery following the final cycle of post-remission therapy. 16 patients (median age 60) have received at least two monthly vaccinations at a dose of 5x106 fusion cells. Remission induction therapy consisted of 7+3 in 13 patients, 7+3 followed by 5+2 re-induction in 1 patient, MEC in one patient, and decitabine in 1 patient. 9 patients had intermediate risk cytogenetics, 2 patients had good risk cytogenetics, and 5 patients had poor cytogenetic risk disease. Vaccination was well tolerated, and importantly, was not associated with clinically significant auto-immunity. Possibly related adverse events were transient and of grade 1-2 intensity, including vaccine site reactions, pruritis, arthalgias, myalgias, eosinophilia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia. Biopsy of vaccine site reactions demonstrated a dense infiltrate of CD4 and CD8 T cells consistent with recruitment of reactive T cell populations to the vaccine bed. To date, 12 of 16 evaluable patients remain in remission (75%), with a median follow up of 45 months. Notably, no patient has relapsed later than 1 year from completing chemotherapy and the patient who was treated in CR2 remains in remission with 51 months of follow up, after having relapsed within a year of CR1. Vaccination resulted in the potent induction of leukemia specific immunity as measured by a mean fold increase of 4.9 CD8 T cells expressing IFNγ in response to ex vivo exposure to autologous leukemia cell lysates (n=14). In a subset of patients who are HLA2.1+, vaccination resulted in the expansion of T cells recognizing MUC1 (4.4 fold increase), WT1 (2.7 fold increase), NY-ESO (3.8 fold increase) tumor antigens by pentamer analysis. In conclusion, DC/AML fusion cell vaccination administered to patients who achieve complete remission results in the potent expansion of leukemia reactive T cells, and durable remissions. A second cohort is planned in which patients will be treated with DC/AML fusion cell vaccination in conjunction with immune checkpoint blockade. DisclosuresStone:Karyopharm: Consultancy; Roche/Genetech: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy, Other: DSMB for clinical trial; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Celator: Consultancy; AROG: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy. Steensma:Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy. DeAngelo:Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Kufe:Genus Oncology: Consultancy, Equity Ownership.

Beyond consolidation: auto-SCT and immunotherapy for plasma cell myeloma.

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is the standard consolidation therapy for plasma cell myeloma patients following induction therapy. Auto-HCT improves disease-free survival (DFS), but is generally not curative. The allogeneic HCT experience demonstrated that T-cell immunotherapy can confer long-term DFS. Preclinical and clinical data indicate that myeloma-associated Ags elicit humoral and cellular immune responses (IRs) in myeloma patients. These findings strongly suggest that the immunotherapeutic strategies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, therapeutic cancer vaccines and adoptive cellular therapies, are promising avenues of clinical research that may be most applicable in the minimal residual disease state following auto-HCT. These strategies are designed to prime or augment antimyeloma IRs and promote a 'host-vs-myeloma' effect that may result in durable DFS. Innovative clinical trials investigating immune checkpoint inhibitors and cancer vaccines have demonstrated that robust immunity against myeloma-associated Ags can be elicited in the setting of auto-HCT. A diverse array of immunotherapeutic strategies have entered clinical trials in myeloma, including PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, DC/myeloma cell fusion vaccines and adoptive chimeric Ag receptor T-cell therapy, and further investigation of combinations of immunologic and pharmaceutical agents are expected in the near future. In this review, we will discuss the preclinical data supporting immunotherapy in auto-HCT for myeloma, clinical investigation of these strategies and the future prospects of immunotherapy in pursuit of the goal of curative therapy.