M ore than 50 years ago, Flor’ described the genetic interrelationship between flax and the flax rust fungus that has since become known as the ‘gene-for-gene’ model. This model provides the genetic basis for active resistance in plants, not only against fungi, but also against viruses, bacteria, nematodes, insects and even parasitic plants, and has been the basis for breeding programs to introduce disease-resistance genes into plants. However, the resistance genes introduced are often circumvented by specific strains of a pathogen. Numerous articles and reviews have considered the molecular and biochemical bases for this intriguing phenomenon. The current view is that active resistance is associated with the hypersensitive response (HR), a local programmed death of plant cells that is triggered by the interaction between the products of pathogen avirulence genes (race-specific elicitors) and the products of plant resistance genes. More than 30 bacterial2 and a handful of fungal avirulence genes3 have been cloned in the past decade, which has partly clarified the role of the pathogen in the game. All bacterial avirulence genes are required to induce HR in plants carrying the complementary resistance genes; however, the avirulence genes do not encode the HR-inducing, race-specific elicitor proteins themselves. In nearly all cases, an additional cluster of hypersensitive response and pathogenicity (hrp) genes is required to induce HR. In contrast, two avirulence genes, Avr4 and Avr9, of the fungal tomato pathogen Cladosporium fulvum encode the elicitor proteins AVR4 and AVRS, which do induce HR in tomato plants with the complementary resistance genes Cf4 and Cf9, respectively4,5. The resistance genes Cf4 and Cf9 are thought to encode either specific receptors that are directly involved in the perception of AVR4 and AVRS, or proteins that are closely associated with these receptors and that are involved in the early steps of the signal transduction pathway leading to HR. The bacterial and fungal avirulence genes that have been cloned so far show that pathogens have adopted four strategies to avoid recognition by their host plants. Strategies include deletions, point mutations, frame-shift mutations and insertions in their avirulence genes, all of which lead to undisturbed growth of the pathogen on previously resistant host plants. Until recently, virtually nothing was known about the structure and function of resistance genes. Do they encode receptors for race-specific elicitor proteins, or regulatory proteins required for the activation of the complex machinery of programmed cell death? However, in 1994, five plant resistance genes were cloned, including one recognizing a virus6, two for bacteria7m9 and two for fungiroy”. The cloning of Cf9 for resistance to C. fulvum by Jones and coworkerslo is particularly exciting, as the AVR9 elicitor protein, required for CfS-dependent HR, has been fully characterized3,5. The structure of the Cf9 gene could elucidate the molecular basis of this particular gene-for-gene system. The Cf9 gene was cloned by transposon tagging, using the HRinducing activity of the AVR9 protein12. The Avr9 gene was expressed in Cf9tomato plants, which were subsequently crossed to Cf9+ plants containing the transposable element
Read full abstract