The media coverage in the Brazilian criminal justice system, especially in the Jury Court, has raised concerns about the impartiality of judicial decisions by interfering with the fundamental rights of defendants. This study aims to analyze the influence of the media on the criminal process, highlighting violations of constitutional principles such as due process, the presumption of innocence, the right to a fair trial, and the right to a broad defense. The impact of public opinion pressure, often fueled by sensationalist media coverage of high-profile cases, is discussed in the context of the impartiality of jurors. The main objective is to propose strategies to mitigate this media interference, including jury sequestration, precise guidance for jurors, and the implementation of measures like "gag orders." The research adopts a qualitative and descriptive approach, based on bibliographical review and the analysis of a concrete case, the Nardoni Case, to illustrate the effects of media on the criminal process. The study suggests that, although it is difficult to completely eliminate media influence, the adoption of effective measures can contribute to ensuring a fairer and more transparent trial, respecting the constitutional rights of the defendants.
Read full abstract