Functional Patient-reported Outcome Measures Research Articles

Effectiveness of the KC@H programme compared with clinic-based rehabilitation in patients recovering from ACL reconstruction: a study protocol for a single-centre, two-arm, single-blinded, randomised controlled superiority trial

Patients who cannot fully comply with conventional clinic-based rehabilitation (CR) sessions after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) may find additional internet-based sessions beneficial. These remote sessions include therapeutic exercises that can be...

Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Vaughan-Jackson Syndrome.

Background Vaughan-Jackson syndrome (VJS) is the attritional rupture of the extensor tendons secondary to arthritis or inflammation affecting the distal radioulnar joint. The surgical outcomes following Darrach's procedure and tendon transfers are not well described. The primary aim of this study was to report patient-reported functional outcome measures after surgery for VJS. Secondary aims were to report health-related quality-of-life scores, patient satisfaction, and complications Methods A single-center retrospective study was performed to identify patients who underwent surgical intervention for the management of VJS. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE), Quick version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), EuroQoL 5-dimensions 5-Likert (EQ-5D-5L), and calculation of the Net Promoter Score (NPS). Results We report postoperative patient-reported functional outcome measures for 12 cases of VJS treated with distal ulna excision and extensor tendon transfer. The mean age was 69 years (range: 45-87 years; standard deviation [SD]: 14.1), and eight patients were females. Five patients had rheumatoid arthritis, and there was one case each of seronegative polyarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and CREST (calcinosis, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasia.) syndrome; the rest of the patients had osteoarthritis. At a mean of 53 months of follow-up, the mean PRWHE score was 34.5 (SD: 17.9), the mean QuickDASH score was 28.2 (SD: 18.6), and the mean EQ-5D-5L score was 0.71 (SD: 0.203). Ten patients were satisfied and the NPS was 42. Postoperatively eight patients had pain scores reported as none or mild, three as moderate, and one as severe. Two patients required further operations, both undergoing total wrist arthrodesis. Conclusion Although a degree of functional deficit persists after Darrach's procedure and tendon transfer for treatment of VJS, there are also high levels of patient satisfaction, a good NPS, and a low rate of operative reintervention. Level IV evidence.

A comparative analysis of suture-augmented and standard hamstring autograft single-bundle ACL reconstruction outcomes: short-term functional benefits without long-term impact

BackgroundAugmentation of the biologic graft with nonabsorbable suture material during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a relatively new technique to enhance its biomechanical properties and add additional support to the critical process of healing. We aimed to compare the short-term functional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complication rates of patients treated with either standard single-bundle four-strand hamstring ACLR or added suture augmentation (SA).MethodsPatients undergoing arthroscopic ACLR between February 2015-January 2017 and in the standard ACLR group, and between February 2017-September 2019 in the SA-ACLR group operated by adding a no.5 FiberWire® (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) braided suture to the hamstring autograft, were retrospectively reviewed and the PROMs were compared. Patients were followed up for a 24-month period and PROMs were assessed by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form and Tegner-Lysholm knee score. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics, and postoperative complications including graft retear requiring revision surgery, deep vein thrombois, and surgical site infection were recorded and analyzed.ResultsWe included 79 patients with mean age of 31.6 ± 8.3 years in the standard ACLR group, and 90 patients with mean oge of 30.5 ± 7.6 in the SA-ACLR group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, body mass index, and medical comorbidities. The values of the IKDC scores increased to 75.8 ± 18.9 in the standard ACLR group, and 85.6 ± 12.6 in the SA-ACLR group, 24 months after the operation (P < 0.05). The 24-month postoperative Tegner-Lysholm scores escalated to 79.3 ± 21.0 in the standard ACLR group and 91.0 ± 13.7 in the SA-ACLR group (P < 0.05). Four (5.1%) patients in the standard ACLR group and 4 (4.4%) in the SA-ACLR group experienced graft retear requiring revision surgery (P > 0.05). Incidence of surgical site infection and deep vein thrombosis showed no significant differences between the two groups, 24 months after ACLR.ConclusionSA-ACLR is associated with improved short-term functional PROMs compared to the standard hamstring ACLR. Although SA did not reduce the retear rate, and infection and DVT rates did not differ between study groups, superior improvement of PROMs in SA approach, leverages this method for ACLR.

Focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: 3-year outcomes from a prospective trial.

To assess the oncological and functional outcomes of focal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in treating localised prostate cancer (PCa), a 3-year prospective study was undertaken using periodic post-ablation saturation biopsies. Men with two or fewer lesions of grade group (GG) ≤3 PCa were eligible for participation. Additional criteria included a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of ≤15 ng/mL, clinical T1c-T2, and a life expectancy of ≥10 years. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival (FFS), defined as absence of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in- or out-of-field on protocol-mandated saturation biopsy, no whole-gland or systemic salvage treatment, PCa metastasis, or PCa-related death. Results are reported using two distinct definitions of csPCa: (i) the presence of any GG ≥2 and (ii) any GG ≥3 or core involvement of ≥6 mm. Secondary endpoints were functional patient-reported outcome measures addressing urinary, sexual, and bowel function. A total of 91 patients were included: six (7%) with GG1 and 85 (93%) with GG ≥2. In all, 83 (91%) underwent at least one follow-up biopsy. Biopsy attendance at 6, 12, and 36 months was 84%, 67%, and 51%, respectively. The FFS at these time points for any GG ≥2 PCa was 79% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80-88%), 57% (95% CI 48-69%) and 44% (95% CI 34-56%), respectively. Using the second definition, FFS were 88% (95% CI 81-95%), 70% (95% CI 61-81%) and 65% (95% CI 55-77%), respectively. The 3-year cancer-specific survival was 100%, and freedom from metastasis was 99%. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (negative predictive value of up to 89%, 95% CI 84-93%) and relative decrease of PSA values (P = 0.4) performed poorly in detecting residual disease. Urinary and bowel assessment returned to baseline questionnaire scores within 3 months. In all, 17 (21%) patients reported meaningful worsening in erectile function. A significant decrease of PCa related anxiety was observed. Focal HIFU treatment for localised PCa shows excellent functional outcomes with half of the patients remaining cancer-free after 3 years. Whole-gland treatment was avoided in 81%. Early follow-up biopsies are crucial to change or continue the treatment modality at the right time, while the use of MRI and PSA in detecting PCa recurrence is uncertain.

The Stroke Upper and Lower Extremity Physical Function Measures Were Supported for Score Reliability, Validity, and Administration Efficiency for Patients Poststroke.

The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the suitability of newly developed items for calibration into 2 item banks for stroke upper extremity (SUE) and stroke lower extremity (SLE) physical function patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and (2) assess score reliability and validity and PROM administration efficiency based on computerized adaptive testing (CAT). A retrospective longitudinal study involving patients poststroke who were treated in outpatient rehabilitation clinics responded to 28 and 25 region-specific candidate items addressing tasks related to upper or lower extremity physical function, respectively. Item response theory model assumptions of unidimensionality, local independence, item fit, and presence of differential item functioning were evaluated. CAT-generated scores were assessed for reliability, validity, and administration efficiency, and 10-item short forms were assessed for reliability. Cohorts consisted of 2017 patients with stroke involving the upper extremity and 2107 patients with stroke involving the lower extremity (mean age [SD]: SUE = 62 [14] and SLE = 63 [14]; range = 14-89). Two solutions (SUE: 28-item; SLE: 24-item) supported unidimensionality and fit to the item response theory model, with reliability estimates >0.93 for all administration modes. No items demonstrated differential item functioning. Scores discriminated among multiple patient groups in clinically logical ways, with better outcomes observed for patients who were younger, were male, had less chronicity, and had fewer comorbidities. The SUE and SLE, respectively, had 1% and 0.3% floor effects and 4.3% and 1.1% ceiling effects. Change score effect sizes were 0.5 (SUE) and 0.6 (SLE). Simulated CAT scores required an average of 6 (SUE) and 5.6 (SLE) items (median = 5). The stroke upper extremity and stroke lower extremity PROM scores were reliable, valid, and efficient and had moderate change effect sizes for assessing physical function as perceived by patients poststroke with upper and lower extremity impairments. Scores had negligible floor and acceptable ceiling effects. Based on these results, the stroke PROMs are suitable for research and routine clinical practice. As item response theory-based measures, these PROMs support clinical practice guideline recommendations for the use of outcome measures in neurologic physical therapy and the administration of condition-specific functional questions with low response burden for patients. The 10-item short forms offer a feasible alternative administration mode when CAT administration is not available.

Item Analysis of Functional Measure Indicators in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: A Cross-sectional Study.

This study aimed to develop a function, activities, and participation measurement scale using the questions on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) by applying item response theory approaches. This was a cross-sectional study. Survey data were collected from 2512 participants within the NHANES. Twenty questions from the NHANES physical functioning section were included. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to evaluate the factorial structure and model fit of the NHANES instrument. A multidimensional Rasch modeling was used to model the response data after confirming its model fit. To assess validity across subgroups, differential item functioning test was conducted with respect to sex and race using the three-dimensional partial credit model. Item fit indices indicated a good fit (root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.049, standardized root-mean-square residual = 0.052, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.975). Rasch analysis indicated that "stoop/crouch/kneel," "stand for long periods," and "push/pull large objects" were the three most difficult items, whereas "walk between rooms," "use fork/knife," and "leisure at home" were the easiest. The measure demonstrated good internal consistency overall (Cronbach α = 0.90). The NHANES function, activities, and participation measure demonstrates sufficient evidence of reliability, internal consistency, and validity in noninstitutionalized community-dwelling population. Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME. Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to (1) Recognize the potential benefits of using validated patient-reported functional outcome measures within the publically available National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data for rehabilitation research; (2) Describe the process of scale development and validation; (3) Identify item difficulty based on the item difficulty distribution; and (4) Identify the applicability of the measure to different population groups based on differential item functioning. Advanced. The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Pre- and Post-Operative Rehabilitation Interventions in Patients at Risk of Poor Outcomes Following Knee or Hip Arthroplasty: Protocol for Two Systematic Reviews.

Total knee (TKA) and hip arthroplasty (THA) are successful procedures in treating end-stage osteoarthritis when nonoperative treatments fail. However, a growing body of literature has been reporting suboptimal outcomes following TKA and THA. While pre- and post-operative rehabilitation is imperative to recovery, little is known about their effectiveness for patients at risk of poor outcomes. In the 2 systematic reviews with identical methodology, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of (a) pre-operative and (b) post-operative rehabilitation interventions for patients at risk of poor outcomes following TKA and THA. The 2 systematic reviews will follow the principles and recommendations outlined in the Cochrane Handbook. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and pilot RCTs will be searched in 6 databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Pedro, and OTseeker. Eligible studies including patients at risk of poor outcomes and evaluating rehabilitation interventions following and preceding arthroplasty will be considered for inclusion. Primary outcomes will include performance-based tests and functional patient-reported outcome measures, and secondary outcomes will include health-related quality of life and pain. The quality of eligible RCTs will be evaluated using the Cochrane's risk of bias tool, and the strength of evidence will be assessed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). These reviews will synthesize the evidence regarding the effectiveness of pre-and post-operative rehabilitation interventions for patients at risk of poor outcomes, which in turn may inform practitioners and patients in planning and implementing the most optimal rehabilitation programs to achieve the best outcomes after arthroplasty. PROSPERO CRD42022355574.

Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to describe changes in patient-reported functional outcome measures (PROMs) comparing pre-treatment and 12 months after radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), brachytherapy and active surveillance (AS).MethodsMen enrolled from 2010 to 2019 in the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative registry a prospective clinical registry were studied. Urinary, bowel, and sexual functions were measured using Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) at baseline and 12 months post-treatment. Higher scores on the EPIC-26 indicate better function. Multivariable regression models were applied to compare differences in function and extent of bother by treatment.ResultsOf the 4926 eligible men, 57.0% underwent RP, 20.5% EBRT, 7.0% brachytherapy and 15.5% AS. While baseline urinary and bowel function varied little across treatment groups, sexual function differed greatly (adjusted mean scores: RP = 56.3, EBRT = 45.8, brachytherapy = 61.4, AS = 52.8; p < 0.001). Post-treatment urinary continence and sexual function declined in all treatment groups, with the greatest decline for sexual function after RP (adjusted mean score change − 28.9). After adjustment for baseline differences, post-treatment sexual function scores after EBRT (6.4; 95%CI, 0.9–12.0) and brachytherapy (17.4; 95%CI, 9.4–25.5) were higher than after RP. Likewise, urinary continence after EBRT (13.6; 95%CI, 9.0-18.2), brachytherapy (10.6; 95%CI, 3.9–17.3) and AS (10.6; 95%CI, 5.9–15.3) were higher than after RP. Conversely, EBRT was associated with lower bowel function (− 7.9; 95%CI, − 12.4 to − 3.5) than RP. EBRT and AS were associated with lower odds of sexual bother (OR 0.51; 95%CI, 0.29–0.89 and OR 0.60; 95%CI, 0.38–0.96, respectively), and EBRT with higher odds of bowel bother (OR 2.01; 95%CI, 1.23–3.29) compared with RP.ConclusionThe four common treatment approaches for prostate cancer were associated with different patterns of patient-reported functional outcomes, both pre- and 12 months post-treatment. However, after adjustment, RP was associated with a greater decline in urinary continence and sexual function than other treatments. This study underscores the importance of collecting baseline PROMs to interpret post-treatment functional outcomes.

Does Total Knee Arthroplasty Positively Affect Body Static-Dynamic Balance and Fall Risk Parameters in Patients With Satisfactory Functional Scores?

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the balance problems and risk of falling by using digital or computerized methods in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and have satisfactory functional scores in the early postoperative period.MethodologyA total of 31 participants (24 women, seven men; mean age: 61.93 ±10.75 years; range: 49-82 years) who underwent unilateral TKA were included. The fall risk was evaluated using the time up-and-go (TUG) test and computerized platforms. Patient-reported pain, stiffness, and physical functional outcome measures [Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS)] and posture (New York Posture Rating Chart) were evaluated.ResultsBased on the WOMAC scores, there was a significant impact on self-reported pain (p˂0.001), function (p=0.001), and stiffness (p=0.001) between preoperative and postoperative results. The OKS (p=0.006) and the TUG score (p=0.004) improved significantly, but the posture scores remained the same after the surgery. There was a statistically significant difference between the preoperative and third-month postoperative test results of the stabilometric test, bipedal opened eye, bipedal closed eye, monopedal right, and monopedal left foot static balance tests (p˂0.05). However, the disequilibrium and equilibrium dynamic balance values ​​remained unchanged three months after TKA.ConclusionsSatisfactory functional scores according to WOMAC or OKS were achieved in the early postoperative period. However, posture and dynamic balance problems related to falling risk continued to persist in the same period. Although the TUG test results were statistically significant, they also showed fall risk values. Fall risk and postural problems should be analyzed objectively using computerized methods. Early rehabilitation programs after TKA in elderly individuals should be designed accordingly and close attention must be paid to fall risks.

Clinical effectiveness of tenotomy versus tenodesis for long head of biceps pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectivesThe comparative clinical effectiveness of common surgical techniques to address long head of biceps (LHB) pathology is unclear. We synthesised the evidence to compare the clinical effectiveness of tenotomy versus...

Dysphagia May Attenuate Improvements in Postoperative Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Past studies outline potential risk factors for dysphagia following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Few studies explored the impact of dysphagia, as measured by the swallowing quality of life (SWAL-QOL), on postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) improvement. This study aimed to determine the relationship between dysphagia and improvement in pain, disability, physical function, and mental health following ACDF. A retrospective review of patients undergoing primary 1- or 2-level ACDF was performed. Individuals without a completed preoperative SWAL-QOL were excluded. Outcomes were collected for visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and SWAL-QOL. Postoperative improvement from preoperative values was evaluated using a paired t test. The impact of SWAL-QOL on each PROM was assessed using linear regression. A total of 91 patients were included. Mean preoperative SWAL-QoL was 90.4, which worsened at 6 weeks and resolved by 6 months (P ≤ 0.007, both). VAS neck and arm scores significantly improved postoperatively (P < 0.001), as did the NDI score (P < 0.001). Physical function significantly improved at 12 weeks and 6 months (P ≤ 0.021, both). Depressive symptoms improved at 6 weeks and 12 weeks (P ≤ 0.007, both). Preoperatively, SWAL-QOL demonstrated significant relationships with all PROMs (P ≤ 0.005, all). At 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months (P ≤ 0.048, all), SWAL-QoL again demonstrated a similar significant association with all PROMs. Multiple regression did not demonstrate common demographic or operative variables that were significant predictors of PROMs. Following ACDF, patients experienced a worsening of dysphagia but resolved by 12 weeks. All PROMs demonstrated significant improvements by the 6-month timepoint, except for PHQ-9. SWAL-QoL demonstrated a significant effect on all postoperative outcomes, which may suggest that this questionnaire could effectively evaluate dysphagia and predict positive or negative outcomes following ACDF. 3 CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The severity of dysphagia has a significant association with pain, disability, mental health, and physical function patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing ACDF.

Nearly half of patients with chronic tendinopathy may have a neuropathic pain component, with significant differences seen between different tendon sites: a prospective cohort of more than 300 patients

ObjectivesIdentifying the prevalence of neuropathic pain components in patients with chronic tendinopathy conditions using the Self-Administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) questionnaire.MethodsPatients with chronic tendinopathy and ‘tendon-like’...

Is ECOG-PS ≥3 appropriate to guide rehabilitation referral decisions? Using patient-reported outcome measures to examine the prevalence of functional disability in patients with ECOG-PS 0-2.

e18724 Background: Outpatient physical or occupational therapy (PT/OT) can optimize cancer patients’ performance status and ability to complete instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). The American College of Sports Medicine recommends referral to PT/OT for those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) ≥3/5. However, ECOG-PS alone may not accurately indicate needs for PT/OT. We used functional patient reported outcome measures (F-PROM) to quantify the prevalence of functional disability for cancer patients with favorable ECOG-PS (0-2) starting a new line of systemic therapy. Methods: Patients with cancer at a multi-office community-based oncology private practice who were enrolled in a clinical trial (NCT04852575) completed a validated online geriatric assessment (the Cancer Aging Resiliency Evaluation) including F-PROM before starting a new line of systemic treatment. F-PROM included: Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) - Cognitive Function (4 item, T-score = 41-80); impact of physical/emotional problems on social activities (social impact, 1-item); ability to walk one block (1-item); pain (0-10); and ability to perform nine IADL (3-point Likert scale). We extracted clinical characteristics from medical records, then used descriptive statistics and established F-PROM disability cut off to quantify the prevalence of functional disability. Results: Most patients (N = 86) were female (58%) and diagnosed with stage 3 or 4 (68%) breast (33%) or gastrointestinal cancer (24%). The mean±SD age was 64.3±10.7 years. ECOG was 0 (66%) or 1 (34%); none had ECOG-PS of &gt;2. Across F-PROM, prevalence of disability ranged 24% (cognitive function) to 42% (social impact), see Table. IADL disability was reported by 31% of patients; median number of unique IADL disabilities was 3 (IQR = 1-4). Most common IADL disabilities were housework (29%), shopping (19%), ability to get to places out of walking distance (16%), and meal preparation (14%). Conclusions: Despite favorable ECOG-PS (0-1), 24 to 41% of patients starting a new line of systemic therapy in this study had one or more needs amendable to PT/OT. Future work should identify strategies to integrate F-PROM into routine oncology practice to identify rehabilitation needs and evaluate if subsequent PT/OT improves patient outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT04852575. [Table: see text]

Self-Reported Disability Following Surgery for Dupuytren Contracture in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients.

Background: The aims of this study were to investigate the impact of diabetes mellitus on patient-reported functional outcome measures (PROMs) and satisfaction following surgical treatment of Dupuytren contracture. Methods: Preoperative and 1-year postoperative PROMs were collected prospectively over 6 years (2013-2019). Patients completed the QuickDASH score and were asked 'how normal is your hand?', recording responses on a 100-point visual analogue scale. Patient satisfaction was also self-reported. Results: Paired responses were available for 520 hands (478 patients; 72% follow-up rate). There were 62 patients with diabetes (12%). Pre (12.5 vs. 9.1; p = 0.01) and postoperative (11.4 vs. 6.8; p = 0.02) QuickDASH scores were significantly, but not clinically, worse in diabetic patients. Patient satisfaction was high in both groups. A large and significant improvement in self-perceived hand normality was observed in both groups (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in preoperative or change in hand normality between the groups, but the postoperative normal hand score was significantly higher in non-diabetic patients (94 vs. 90; p = 0.02). Conclusion: Our study has demonstrated statistically significantly worse disability in diabetic patients with Dupuytren contracture both pre- and postoperatively, though the observed differences were far below the minimum clinically important difference for the QuickDASH. Both groups reported a large and statistically significant improvement in self-perceived hand normality following surgery. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

A Qualitative Study of the Functional Outcomes Following First Metatarsophalangeal Joint (MTPJ) Arthrodesis Based on a Procedure Focused Questionnaire

Hallux rigidus is the second most common condition to affect the first ray with an incidence of 2.5% in those above 50 years. Metatarsophalangeal Joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis remains the standard surgery. There are currently no patient-reported outcome measures or functional outcome measures specific to first MTPJ arthrodesis. Finding out what patients can and cannot do after surgery would help surgeons appropriately consent patients and manage expectations pre- and postsurgery. A pilot group of 15 patients postarthrodesis agreed on the suitability of the questions developed by the authors. As no further changes were made, a further 35 patients were recruited. Median age was 68 years, 78% were females, and 68% of patients were retired. Median follow-up was 64.5 months. Complete or almost complete pain relief was reported by 92% of patients. No major difficulty was reported by 97% of patients using ladders, 95% of patients driving, 90% of patients standing, 86% of patients wearing shoes without heels. Fifty-seven percent of patients reported extreme difficulty running and 48% of patients reported moderate or extreme difficulties wearing shoes with heels. None of the men reported difficulty with shoe wear without heels compared to 18% of women (p = .01). None of the men reported any difficulty in driving compared to 18% of women (p = .06). Difficulty in walking was reported in 44% of women compared to 9% of men (p = N/S). Our study is the first to reflect patients’ own long term experiences following first MTPJ arthrodesis. Based on our study, following first MTPJ arthrodesis the majority of patients did not have trouble with pain, walking, standing, and driving. More than half of patients did not have trouble wearing shoes without heels; up to a third didn't have trouble wearing heels. More women experienced difficulty compared to men wearing shoes without heels, driving, and walking.

Do patient-reported outcome measures improve after aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty?

The purpose of this study was to determine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) changes in: (1) pain, function and global health; and (2) predictors of PROMs in patients undergoing aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) using a multilevel model with patients nested within surgeon. A prospective cohort of 216 patients with baseline and 1-year PROMs who underwent aseptic rTHA between January 2016 and December 2017 were analysed. The most common indication for rTHA was aseptic loosening, instability, and implant failure. The PROMs included in this study were HOOS Pain and HOOS Physical Function Short-form (PS), Veterans RAND-12 Physical Component Score (VR-12 PCS), and VR-12 Mental Component Score (MCS). Multivariable linear regression models were constructed for predicting 1-year PROMs. Mean 1-year PROMs improvement for aseptic revisions were 30.4 points for HOOS Pain and 22.1 points for HOOS PS. Predictors of better pain relief were patients with higher baseline pain scores. Predictors of better 1-year function were patients with higher baseline function and patients with a posterolateral hip surgical approach during revision. Although VR-12 PCS scores had an overall improvement, nearly 50% of patients saw no improvement or had worse physical component scores. Only 30.7% of patients reported improvements in VR-12 MCS. Overall, patients undergoing aseptic rTHA improved in pain and function PROMs at 1 year. Although global health assessment improved overall, nearly half of aseptic rTHA patients reported no change in physical/mental health status. The associations highlighted in this study can help guide the shared decision-making process by setting expectations before aseptic revision THA.

Outcomes of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion Using a Precontoured Plate.

The purpose of this study was to determine the results of an arthrodesis technique of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) using a precontoured dorsal plate to correct the hallux valgus deformity. This was a retrospective analysis of outcomes for first MTPJ arthrodesis performed using 2 precontoured dorsal plates. Radiographic outcomes (intermetatarsal angle [IMA] and hallux valgus angle [HVA]) and patient-reported functional outcome measures (Short-Form 12 and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score) were recorded and compared. Fifty-five patients underwent 77 first MTPJ arthrodeses for severe hallux valgus deformity with associated degenerative changes at the first MTPJ. The mean reduction of the IMA was 5.67° (P < .05) and the mean reduction of the HVA was 33° (P < .05). The Short-Form 12 assessment of global health demonstrated a significant improvement in both the physical and mental health composite scores by 16.4 points and 10.4 points (P < .05), respectively. The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score demonstrated a cumulative decrease of 35% (59.28; P < .05) in all domains. First MTPJ arthrodesis using a precontoured dorsal plate is a successful procedure with a high union rate, low complication rate, and a high level of patient-reported satisfaction. Level III.

The Impact of Concomitant LOW Back Pain (LBP) on Functional Outcomes in Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA)

Although numerous studies have demonstrated that concomitant low back pain (LBP) is associated with worse functional outcomes in patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty, no study has analyzed its impact on patients undergoing total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of LBP in people undergoing TAA and analyze its impact on patient reported functional outcome measures (PROMs). A retrospective review was performed on data from the Vancouver End Stage Ankle Arthritis Database. In total, 87 patients undergoing TAA were studied, with patient demographics collected preoperatively, including the absence or presence of LBP. Postoperative follow-up was performed at 5 years, primarily analyzing disease-specific PROMs including the Ankle Osteoarthritis Score and Ankle Arthritis Score. The Short Form-36 was used as a secondary outcome measure to assess global function. Multivariable linear mixed-effects regression models were conducted to compare the PROM between patients with LBP with those without LBP. In total, 30 patients (35%) presented with concomitant LBP. There were no significant differences at baseline between the LBP group and no LBP group in terms of demographics or baseline primary disease-specific PROMs. At 5 years, the patients with LBP had significantly worse Ankle Arthritis Score (32 ± 23 vs 22 ± 17, p = .03), Ankle Osteoarthritis Score Total (34 ± 23 vs 22 ± 16, p = .01), and Short Form-36 physical (PCS) components summaries (33 ± 12 vs 44 ± 9, p = .001) compared to the no-LBP group. Both groups improved significantly from baseline across all outcome measures. Our study demonstrated that the prevalence of concomitant LBP in end stage ankle arthritis undergoing TAA is similar to that described in arthritic knees and hips. If present, it can be associated with worse functional outcomes in the intermediate term. However it is not a contraindication to surgery, with patients still experiencing significant improvements from baseline. Further studies are needed to evaluate if LBP influences complications, implant failure rates and survival.

The Impact of Concomitant Ipsilateral Knee Pain on Functional Outcomes in Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

In end-stage ankle arthritis, little is known about the impact of concomitant knee pathology, including the impact of ipsilateral knee pain on total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of ipsilateral preoperative knee pain in patients undergoing TAA and analyze its impact on patient-reported functional outcome measures (PROMs). A retrospective review was performed on the Vancouver End Stage Ankle Arthritis Database at a single institution. In total, 114 patients were studied, with patient demographics collected preoperatively, including the presence or absence of knee pain. Postoperative follow-up was performed at 5 years, primarily analyzing disease-specific PROMs, including the Ankle Osteoarthritis Score (AOS) and Ankle Arthritis Score (AAS). Multivariate mixed-effects linear regression models compared the scores between the groups. In total, 31 patients (27.2%) presented with concomitant ipsilateral knee pain. Despite more females in the knee pain group (64.5% vs 36.1%) there were no other significant differences at baseline between the knee pain and no knee pain groups in terms of demographics or baseline primary disease specific PROMs. At 5 years, the patients with knee pain had significantly worse AAS (37.9 ± 23.8 vs 21.2 ± 16.3, P = .004) and AOS total scores (38.1 ± 24.1 vs 21.9 ± 15.5, P = .005) compared with the no-knee pain group. Both groups improved significantly from baseline across all outcome measures; however, the magnitude of improvement was less in the knee pain group. Our study demonstrated that over one-quarter of patients with end-stage ankle arthritis undergoing TAA present with ipsilateral concomitant knee pain. If present, it is associated with worse functional outcomes at the 5-year mark. Further studies are needed to evaluate if knee pain influences complications, implant failure rates, and survival.Levels of Evidence: Level III.

Predictors of functional outcome in musculoskeletal healthcare: An umbrella review.

Multiple cohort and systematic review studies exist, reporting independent predictive factors associated with outcome in musculoskeletal populations. These studies have found evidence for a number of "generic" factors that have been shown to predict outcome across musculoskeletal patient cohorts. This review provides a higher level review of the evidence with a focus on generic patient factors associated with functional musculoskeletal outcome with a view to informing predictive modelling. (a) Identify patient factors found to have evidence to support their association with functional outcome, and (b) review these findings across body areas/conditions to identify generic predictive factors. Electronic databases of MEDLINE, AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane were searched for eligible studies. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed quality using an established checklist for umbrella reviews. Twenty-one systematic reviews met inclusion criteria, all were of moderate/high quality. Six independent predictors were found to have strong evidence of association with worse musculoskeletal functional outcome across anatomical body sites (worse baseline function, higher symptom/pain severity, worse mental well-being, more comorbidities, older age and higher body mass index). Longer duration of symptoms, worse pain coping, presence of workers compensation, lower vitality and lower education were also found to have moderate evidence of association with worse functional outcome across body sites. This study identifies a number of factors associated with musculoskeletal functional outcome. The generic predictive factors identified should be considered for inclusion into musculoskeletal prognostic models, including models used for case-mix-adjustment of patient reported outcome measure data. This article identifies "generic" patient factors that predict functional outcome (measured using Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)) across musculoskeletal conditions. Findings provide support for the development and content of generic musculoskeletal prognostic models including models used to case-mix adjust PROM data for baseline complexity. Generic musculoskeletal models and functional PROMs would facilitate more feasible comparison and benchmarking of musculoskeletal services in order to identify variation and address health inequalities.