In February, 2006, a 22-year-old man was brought to our trauma resuscitation room. He reported having been shot twice in the back. On examination, his blood pressure and heart rate were 130/70 mm Hg and 80 bpm, respectively. He was awake, alert, and oriented. The gunshot wounds were in the right back, below the 12th rib, four fi ngerbreadths lateral to the midline. A thorough search revealed no other wounds. Both chest (fi gure A) and plain abdominal supine radiography showed a single foreign body. No free intra-peritoneal or intra-pericardial fl uid was detected by ultrasonography. The patient underwent an intravenous injected CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. A single bullet was identifi ed lodged in the right paraspinal muscle. Otherwise, the images were interpreted as negative for intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal injuries. The second bullet wound was presumed to be a graze injury. Further imaging review showed a foreign body in the left thigh, asymmetry of the psoas muscles with fullness in the right compared with the left, and minimal fl uid around the vena cava. In the interim, the patient complained of diff use abdominal pain in the left upper quadrant and epigastrium. The pain migrated to the basal left chest. Vital signs were normal. Repeat chest radiography showed a new foreign body in the chest (fi gure B). The patient immediately underwent a repeat chest CT. This showed a bullet in the right ventricle. Plain radiography of the left leg showed that the foreign body had disappeared. An interventional team attempted, unsuccessfully, to remove the intra-cardiac bullet. A venogram showed no discernible injury in the vena cava. A repeat abdominal CT showed slightly increased haemoperitioneum with stranding around the right adrenal gland and posterior vena cava. Surgery was therefore delayed until the third post-injury day, when the patient underwent sternotomy and cardiotomy with cardiac bypass under full anticoagulation. Full heparinisation for cardiac bypass was considered safe after the venogram confi rmed integrity of the posterior wall of the vena cava. A 1 cm bullet was removed from behind a tricuspid valve leafl et. The patient was discharged on the 7th post-operative day. When seen for fi nal follow-up in, July, 2006, the patient had recovered fully without any complications. A review of the events leads us to assume that the second bullet traversed the psoas muscle and pierced the posterior aspect of the infra-hepatic vena cava, stopped, and fell into the left profunda femoris vein. The welldeveloped psoas muscle in this young man absorbed the majority of the potential energy, stopping the bullet in its tracts. Otherwise the bullet would have pierced the anterior wall of the vena cava, probably causing massive haemoperitoneum and haemodynamic instability. The migrating abdominal pain may have been related to the bullet obstructing mesenteric venous beds as it travelled via the inferior vena cava to the heart. This is an unusual and potentially serious complication of a bullet embolising through the venous system and to the heart. A fi rst review of the CT failed to identify the foreign body in the profunda femoris vein. The clinicians were focused on identifying retroperitoneal and intra-abdominal injuries, and none was immediately obvious. This case highlights the importance of a systematic review of all imaging by an experienced reader before clinical decisions are made. In addition, this case report emphasises the need to aggressively rule out anatomical traumatic lesions in patients with gunshot wound to the torso, until proven otherwise, by both clinical and advanced radiological examinations.
Read full abstract