Full-endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy Research Articles

Treatment of a symptomatic cervical cerebrospinal fluid fistula after full endoscopic cervical foraminotomy with CT-guided epidural fibrin patch

BackgroundThere is only limited data on the management of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulas after cervical endoscopic spine surgery. We investigated the current literature for treatment options and present a case of a patient who was treated with CT-guided epidural fibrin patch.MethodsWe present the case of a 47-year-old female patient with a suspected CSF fistula after endoscopic decompression for C7 foraminal stenosis. She was readmitted 8 days after surgery with dysesthesia in both upper extremities, orthostatic headache and neck pain, which worsened during mobilization. A CSF leak was suspected on spinal magnetic resonance imaging. A computer tomography (CT)-guided epidural blood patch was performed with short-term relief. A second CT-guided epidural fibrin patch was executed and the patient improved thereafter and was discharged at home without sensorimotor deficits or sequelae. We investigated the current literature for complications after endoscopic spine surgery and for treatment of postoperative CSF fistulas.ResultsAlthough endoscopic and open revision surgery with dura repair were described in previous studies, dural tears in endoscopic surgery are frequently treated conservatively. In our case, the patient was severely impaired by a persistent CSF fistula. We opted for a less invasive treatment and performed a CT-guided fibrin patch which resulted in a complete resolution of patient’s symptoms.Discussion and conclusionCSF fistulas after cervical endoscopic spine procedures are rare complications. Conservative treatment or revision surgery are the standard of care. CT-guided epidural fibrin patch was an efficient and less invasive option in our case.

Comparison of the Outcomes of Microendoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy versus Full-endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy for the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy.

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of microendoscopic cervical foraminotomy (MECF) versus full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (FECF) for treating cervical radiculopathy (CR).A retrospective study was performed on patients with CR treated using MECF (n = 35) or FECF (n = 89). A 16-mm tubular retractor and endoscope was used for MECF, while a 4.1-mm working channel endoscope was used for FECF. Patient background and operative data were collected. The numerical rating scale (NRS) and the Neck Disability Index scores were recorded preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Postoperative subjective satisfaction was also assessed.Although the NRS, and NDI scores, as well as postoperative satisfaction at 1 year considerably improved in both groups, one of the background data (number of operated vertebral level) was significantly different. Therefore, we separately analyzed single- and two-level CR. In single-level CR, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative stay, NDI after 1 year, and reoperation rate were statistically superior in FECF group. In two-level CR, the postoperative stay was statistically superior in FECF group. Three postoperative hematomas were observed in the MECF group, while none was observed in the FECF group.Operative outcomes did not significantly differ between groups. We did not observe postoperative hematoma in FECF even without placement of a postoperative drain. Therefore, we recommend FECF as the first option for the treatment of CR as it has a better safety profile and is minimally invasive.

Cervical kinematic change after posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy for disc herniation or foraminal stenosis.

Posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (PECF) is one of minimally invasive surgical techniques for cervical radiculopathy. Because of minimal disruption of posterior cervical structures, such as facet joint, cervical kinematics was minimally changed. However, a larger resection of facet joint is required for cervical foraminal stenosis (FS) than disc herniation (DH). The objective was to compare the cervical kinematics between patients with FS and DH after PECF. Consecutive 52 patients (DH, 34 vs. FS, 18) who underwent PECF for single-level radiculopathy were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical parameters (neck disability index, neck pain and arm pain), and segmental, cervical and global radiological parameters were compared at postoperative 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. A linear mixed-effect model was used to assess interactions between groups and time. Any occurrence of significant pain during follow-up was recorded during a mean follow-up period of 45.5 months (range 24-113 months). Clinical parameters improved after PECF, with no significant differences between groups. Recurrent pain occurred in 6 patients and surgery (PECF, anterior discectomy and fusion) was performed in 2 patients. Pain-free survival rate was 91% for DH and 83% for FS, with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.29). Radiological changes were not different between groups (P > 0.05). Segmental neutral and extension curvature became more lordotic. Cervical curvature became more lordotic on neutral and extension X-rays, and the range of cervical motion increased. The mismatch between T1-slope and cervical curvature decreased. Disc height did not change, but the index level showed degeneration at postoperative 2 years. Clinical and radiological outcomes after PECF were not different between DH and FS patients and kinematics were significantly improved. These findings may be informative in a shared decision-making process.

A Comparative Study on the Minimal Invasiveness of Full-Endoscopic and Microendoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy Using Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring.

Background and Objectives: Full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (FECF) and microendoscopic cervical foraminotomy (MECF) are effective surgeries for cervical radiculopathy and are considered minimally invasive in terms of damage to paraspinal soft tissue. However, no studies have quantitatively compared FECF and MECF in terms of neurological invasiveness. The aim of this study was to compare the neurological invasiveness of FECF and MECF using intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. Materials and Methods: A chart review was conducted of 224 patients with cervical radiculopathy who underwent FECF or MECF between April 2014 and March 2020. Patients were 37 women and 187 men, with a mean age of 51 (range, 21–86) years. FECF was performed in 143 cases and MECF was performed in 81 cases. Results: Average MEP amplitude significantly increased from 292 mV before to 677 mV after nerve root decompression in patients who underwent the FECF. The average improvement rate was 273%. In patients who underwent the MECF, average MEP amplitude significantly increased from 306 mV before to 432 mV after nerve root decompression. The average improvement rate was 130%. The improvement rate was significantly higher for FECF compared with MECF. Conclusions: MEP amplitude increased after nerve root decompression in both FECF and MECF, but the improvement rate was higher in FECF. These results suggest that FECF might be more minimally invasive than MECF in terms of neurological aspects.

Degree of satisfaction following full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy.

Foraminotomy has been reported to be effective for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy (CR). Foraminotomy has been performed by an open approach or minimally invasive approach using a microscope or endoscope. A review of the literature has revealed that both the open and minimally invasive approach provide good clinical results. Since the introduction of full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (FECF) followed by microendoscopic cervical foraminotomy, we adopted FECF in 2016. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of satisfaction following FECF for CR. A total of 109 consecutive patients underwent FECF for CR. All operations were performed at Iwai Orthopaedic Medical Hospital. Patient background information and operative data were collected. The numerical rating scale (NRS) score for the arm was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at the time of discharge from the hospital. The satisfaction score was also recorded at discharge and the 3 months after the operation. In total 109 patients, the mean age was 51.3 years; 22.9% were female and 77.1% were male. The cervical level most frequently operated on was C6/7, followed by C5/6. The mean hospital stay was 4.7 days. The mean operation time was 61.7 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 0 to 10 mg in all cases. One patient exhibited temporary postoperative muscle weakness, although he recovered within 1 year. There was one case of dural tear, and no cases of nerve root injury or surgical site infection. There was one case of reoperation by microendoscopic surgery in 3 months due to insufficient improvement. Preoperative NRS scores for the arm was 4.6 and it improved significantly postoperatively to 2.1 for the entire study group. The mean satisfaction score at discharge was 7.5. The mean score at 3 months after the operations was 7.4. Degree of satisfaction following FECF for CR was high 3 months after the operation.

Percutaneous posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy: a finite element analysis and radiological assessment

Percutaneous posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy (PECFD) is recognized as a safe, effective, and minimally invasive treatment for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). However, the potential mechanisms of the degenerative changes and postoperative recurrence after PECFD are unclear. In this study, a finite element (FE) analysis and radiological assessment were performed to evaluate the biomechanical effects after PECFD. The FE model indicated that the ROM and IDP of C5–C6 increased significantly after PECFD in the extension loading. The radiological evaluation revealed that the extension ROM of C2–C7 and the operative level increased significantly at the one-year follow-up compared with that obtained preoperatively. Combining the FE results and radiological changes, we conclude that the increase in the ROM and IDP at the operative level in the extension loading is the potential cause of the degenerative changes and recurrences after PECFD surgery.

Surgical design and clinical application of posterior percutaneous full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy for cervical osseous foraminal stenosis

To design the method of posterior percutaneous full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (P-PECF) for treating cervical osseous foraminal stenosis and analyze its feasibility in clinical application. The clinical data of 12 patients with cervical osseous foraminal stenosis who met the selection criteria between October 2015 and June 2017 were retrospectively analysed. There were 7 males and 5 females with an age of 52-63 years (mean, 57.6 years). The disease duration ranged from 15 days to 6 months (mean, 3.7 months). The segments included C 4, 5 in 2 cases, C 5, 6 in 6 cases, and C 6, 7 in 4 cases; all showing root pain or numbness caused by nerve root compression. All patients were treated with the P-PECF technique. At preoperation, immediately after operation, and at last follow-up, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and neck disability index (NDI) were respectively recorded to assess the patient's quality of life and the pain of neck and arm. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by the modified Macnab criteria. All operations were successful. The operation time was 71-105 minutes (mean, 82 minutes); the intraoperative blood loss was about 5 mL. The CT of the cervical spine at 1 week postoperatively showed that the cervical root canal was enlarged and the nerve root compression was relieved. The symptoms of neck and arm pain and numbness were relieved; the hospitalization time was 2-5 days (mean, 3 days). All patients were followed up 6-18 months (mean, 12.3 months). Except for 1 patient's feeling transient hypoesthesia postoperatively, there was no complication such as hematoma, nerve root injury, or incision infection. The VAS scores and NDI at immediate postoperatively and at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores ( P<0.05); and the scores also improved significantly at last follow-up when compared with the scores at immediate postoperatively ( P<0.05). According to modified Macnab criteria, the results were excellent in 9 cases, good in 2 cases, and fair in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 91.7%. The P-PECF technique can enlarge the nerve root canal and relieve nerve root compression, and obtain better effectiveness by minimally invasive methods. It is a safe and feasible procedure.

Clinical Observation of Posterior Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy as a Treatment for Osseous Foraminal Stenosis.

To observe the clinical effects of posterior percutaneous full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy in patients with osseous foraminal stenosis. Nine patients with osseous foraminal stenosis underwent surgery using the posterior percutaneous full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy technique and received follow-up care for 1 year. The visual analog scale score, neck disability index, and modified Macnab criteria were recorded at the last follow-up. All patients underwent three-dimensional computed tomography of the cervical spine, which was reviewed within 1 week postoperatively. All operations were successful, and all patients received follow-up care. The mean operation time was 80 minutes. Surgical bleeding was not observed, and no related complications occurred. Postoperative visual analog scale and neck disability index scores were significantly reduced compared with the preoperative assessment. In addition, imaging showed that the osteophytes in the intervertebral foramen were adequately resected. According to modified Macnab criteria, 6 cases showed excellent results, 3 cases showed good results, and no fine or bad results were observed. Posterior percutaneous full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy can accomplish full nerve root decompression and is a safe, feasible procedure. Therefore, it can be a treatment option for patients with osseous foraminal stenosis.