FS-LASIK Group Research Articles

Early changes in corneal densitometry after FS-LASIK combined with accelerated corneal cross-linking for correction of high myopia.

To observe the effects of femtosecond laser-assisted excimer laser in situ keratomileusis combined with accelerated corneal cross-linking (FS-LASIK Xtra) on corneal densitometry after correcting for high myopia. In this prospectively study, 130 patients underwent FS-LASIK or FS-LASIK Xtra for high myopia. Their right eyes were selected for inclusion in the study, of which 65 cases of 65 eyes in the FS-LASIK group, 65 patients with 65 eyes in the FS-LASIK Xtra group. Patients were evaluated for corneal densitometry at 1, 3, and 6mo postoperatively using Pentacam Scheimpflug imaging. Preoperative differences in corneal densitometry between the FS-LASIK and FS-LASIK Xtra groups in different ranges were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Layer-by-layer analysis revealed statistically significant differences in the anterior (120 µm), central, and total layer corneal densitometry between the FS-LASIK and FS-LASIK Xtra groups at 1 and 3mo postoperatively (all P<0.05), the FS-LASIK Xtra group is higher than that of the FS-LASIK group. Analysis of different diameter ranges showed statistically significant differences between the FS-LASIK group and the FS-LASIK Xtra group at 1mo postoperatively in the ranges of 0-2, 2-6, and 6-10 mm (both P<0.05); At 3mo postoperatively, the FS-LASIK Xtra group is higher than that of the FS-LASIK group in the ranges of 0-2 and 2-6 mm (P<0.05). At 6mo postoperatively, there were no statistically significant differences in corneal densitometry between the FS-LASIK group and the FS-LASIK Xtra group in different diameter ranges (all P>0.05). There is an increase in internal corneal densitometry during the early postoperative period after FS-LASIK Xtra for correction of high myopia. However, the densitometry values decreased to the level of conventional FS-LASIK at 6mo after surgery, with the most significant changes observed in the superficial central zone.

In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Response to Three Different Laser Corneal Refractive Surgeries.

To compare the effects of three common refractive surgeries on corneal biomechanics. Two hundred seven patients who had refractive surgery were included in this study, of whom 65 received transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK), 73 received femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FSLASIK), and 69 received small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Each patient had biomechanical measurements using the Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The measurements included five parameters expected to be associated with corneal biomechanics: deformation amplitude ratio at 2 mm (DAR2), integrated inverse radius (IIR), stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), highest concavity time (HCT), and the updated stress-strain index (SSIv2). The variations in these parameters postoperatively among the three surgeries, and their relationship with corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure measured by the Dynamic Contour Tonometer (DCT-IOP) were analyzed. SP-A1 decreased significantly from preoperatively to 3 months postoperatively in all three groups, whereas DAR2 and IIR increased significantly, all indicating stiffness losses. Between 3 and 6 months postoperatively, the results were inconsistent, with DAR2 decreasing (indicating stiffness increases) and IIR increasing (denoting stiffness decreases) in the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups. The decrease in SSIv2 (the only measure of corneal material stiffness) postoperatively was comparatively less pronounced at both 3 and 6 months postoperatively. On the other hand, HCT remained generally stable after all three surgeries. Unlike DAR2, IIR, and SP-A1, the changes postoperatively in stiffness parameters HCT and SSIv2 were independent of the corresponding changes in both DCT-IOP and CCT. Among the stiffness parameters considered, SSIv2 was not correlated with CCT or DCT-IOP, and holds promise for representing the corneal material stiffness and how it remains largely unaffected by refractive surgeries. Overall, FS-LASIK had the most significant impact on corneal stiffness, followed by SMILE, and finally tPRK. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(5):e344-e352.].

Effect of corneal cross-linking on biomechanical changes following transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.

Purpose: To evaluate the change in corneal biomechanics in patients with postoperative ectasia risk when combining two common laser vision correction procedures (tPRK and FS-LASIK) with cross-linking (in tPRK Xtra and FS-LASIK Xtra). Methods: The study included 143 eyes of 143 myopic, astigmatic patients that were divided into non-cross-linked refractive surgery groups (non-Xtra groups, tPRK and FS-LASIK) and cross-linked groups (Xtra groups, tPRK Xtra and FS-LASIK Xtra) according to an ectasia risk scoring system. The eyes were subjected to measurements including the stress-strain index (SSI), the stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), the integrated inverse radius (IIR), the deformation amplitude at apex (DA), and the ratio of deformation amplitude between apex and 2mm from apex (DARatio2mm). The measurements were taken preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6months postoperatively (pos1m, pos3m, and pos6m). Posterior demarcation line depth from the endothelium (PDLD) and from the ablation surface (DLA) were recorded at pos1m. Results: SP-A1 significantly decreased, while IIR, deformation amplitude, and DARatio2mm increased significantly postoperatively in all four groups (p < 0.01)-all denoting stiffness decreases. In the FS-LASIK group, the changes in IIR, DA, and DARatio2mm were 32.7 ± 15.1%, 12.9 ± 7.1%, and 27.2 ± 12.0% respectively, which were significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to 20.1 ± 12.8%, 6.4 ± 8.2%, and 19.7 ± 10.4% in the FS-LASIK Xtra group. In the tPRK group, the change in IIR was 27.3 ± 15.5%, significantly larger than 16.9 ± 13.4% in the tPRK Xtra group. The changes of SSI were minimal in the tPRK (-1.5 ± 21.7%, p = 1.000), tPRK Xtra (8.4 ± 17.9%, p = 0.053), and FS-LASIK Xtra (5.6 ± 12.7%, p = 0.634) groups, but was significant in the FS-LASIK group (-12.1 ± 7.9%, p < 0.01). After correcting for baseline biomechanical metrics, preoperative bIOP and the change in central corneal thickness (△CCT) from pre to pos6m, the changes in the IIR in both FS-LASIK and tPRK groups, as well as DA, DARatio2mm and SSI in the FS-LASIK group remained statistically greater than their corresponding Xtra groups (all p < 0.05). Most importantly, after correcting for these covariates, the changes in DARatio2mm in the FS-LASIK Xtra became statistically smaller than in the tPRK Xtra (p = 0.017). Conclusion: The statistical analysis results indicate that tPRK Xtra and FS-LASIK Xtra effectively reduced the biomechanical losses caused by refractive surgery (tPRK and FS-LASIK). The decrease in corneal overall stiffness was greater in FS-LASIK than in tPRK, and the biomechanical enhancement of CXL was also higher following LASIK than after tPRK.

Assessment of Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Flap Predictability by Laser and Moria Microkeratome

Objective: In the present study, we compared LASIK flap thickness predictability created by a FS laser versus a Moria microkeratome in Mongolian patients. Methods: A total of ninety-six candidates for the LASIK procedure were stratified into two groups: FS laser-assisted and MK flap creation. Flap thickness was determined at five points. The side-cut angle was measured in three directions at the margin interface. LASIK flap assessment was performed one month postoperatively by Spectralis anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Results: Ninety-five participants (190 eyes) were recruited; 190 eyes were stratified to the FS group and 78 eyes to the MK group. The FS group had relatively even flap configurations, and the MK group had meniscus-shaped flaps. Regarding CR-sphere and cylinder, there was significant difference between 2 groups. The mean cylinder was -1.216 ± 0.924 in FS group while it was -0.730 ± 0.738 in MK group. Similarly, the mean sphere was -3.635 ± 2.031 in FS-LASIK group and -2.984 ± 1.502 in MK-LASIK group. The side-cut architecture varied among the two groups. OCT-C and OCT1Temporal values were significantly different between two groups. Conclusion: Improving the predictability of LASIK flap thickness and morphology is significantly important.

Development and validation of an intuitive biomechanics-based method for intraocular pressure measurement: a modal analysis approach

BackgroundCurrent intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements based on non-contact tonometry are derived from statistics-driven equations and lack biomechanical significance, which often leads to under-estimation in post-refractive surgery cornea. This study aims to introduce and validate modal analysis-derived intraocular pressure (mIOP) as a novel method generated through Legendre-based modal decomposition of the anterior corneal contour; it provides an accurate and intuitive IOP measurement from an energy-based perspective.MethodsThis retrospective study included 680 patients. Healthy participants were divided into reference (n = 385) and validation (n = 142) datasets, and the others underwent either femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK, n = 58) or transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK, n = 55). Corneal curvature of the right eyes was extracted from raw serial cross-sectional images of the cornea generated by Corvis ST, a noncontact tonometer with a high-speed Scheimpflug-camera. Legendre expansion was then applied to the corneal curvature to obtain the modal profiles (i.e., temporal changes of the coefficient for each basis polynomial [modes]). Using the reference dataset, feature selection on the modal profiles generated a final mIOP model consisting of a single parameter: total area under curve (frames 1–140) divided by the area under curve of the rising phase (frames 24–40) in the fourth mode, i.e. the M4 ratio. Validation was performed in both the healthy validation and postoperative datasets. IOP-Corvis, pachymetry-corrected IOP, biomechanically corrected IOP, and mIOP values were compared. For the FS-LASIK and TPRK groups, pairwise postoperative IOP changes were analyzed through repeated measures analysis of variance, and agreement was examined through Bland–Altman analysis. Using a finite element analysis based three-dimensional model of the human cornea, we further compared the M4 ratio with the true intraocular pressure within the physiological range.ResultsThe M4 ratio-based mIOP demonstrated weak to negligible association with age, radius of corneal curvature, and central corneal thickness (CCT) in all validation analyses, and performed comparably with biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP) in the refractive surgery groups. Both remained nearly constant postoperatively and were not influenced by CCT changes. Additionally, M4 ratio accurately represented true intraocular pressure in the in silico model.ConclusionsmIOP is a reliable IOP measurement in healthy and postrefractive surgery populations. This energy-based, ratio-derived approach effectively filters out pathological, rotational, misaligned movements and serves as an interpatient self-calibration index. Modal analysis of corneal deformation dynamics provides novel insights into regional corneal responses against pressure loading.

Comparison of Changes in Corneal Thickness and Curvature After Myopia Correction Between SMILE and FS-LASIK.

To comparatively investigate the changes in corneal thickness and curvature between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Data were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months, including central corneal thickness (CCT), midperipheral corneal thickness (MPCT), peripheral corneal thickness (PCT), central keratometry (CK), midperipheral keratometry (MPK), and peripheral keratometry (PK), using a dual rotating Scheimpflug analyzer. At 1 week postoperatively, changes in CCT, MPCT, PCT, and PK were significantly greater in the SMILE group than in the FS-LASIK group (P = .003 for CCT and < .001 for MPCT, PCT, and PK), but no significant inter-group differences were found between changes in CK and MPK (P = .883 and .513, respectively). CCT, MPCT, and PK values showed a similar increase in both groups, but significantly more increase in PCT and significantly less increase in CK and MPK was observed in the SMILE group from 1 week to 3 months after surgery. At 3 months postoperatively, CCT and MPCT were significantly thinner in the SMILE group than in the FSLASIK group (P = .018 and .022, respectively), and there was no significant difference in PCT, CK, MPK, and PK between the two groups. SMILE caused significantly more corneal thinning at the center, midperiphery, and periphery, and more corneal flattening at the periphery, compared to FS-LASIK. A different pattern of corneal remodeling was observed between the two surgeries during the 3-month follow-up period. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(1):15-22.].

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes between Combined Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis and Corneal Cross Linking versus Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Corneal Cross Linking.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with prophylactic cross linking (FS-LASIK Xtra) and small-incision lenticule extraction with prophylactic cross linking (SMILE Xtra) in terms of their postoperative clinical outcomes. Methods In this retrospective study, 24 patients (48 eyes) with myopia and myopia astigmatism were recruited from 2017 to 2018. All patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations preoperatively and follow-up visits at one and three months. Four patients (eight eyes) in each group were followed up for 12 months. The following were assessed at each visit: uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), keratometry values, biomechanical properties, anterior and posterior curvature, and corneal pachymetry. Results The FS-LASIK Xtra and SMILE Xtra groups both included 24 eyes of 12 patients. At 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery, a UDVA of 20/20 or better was achieved for 91.7%, 91.7%, and 87.5% of individuals, respectively, in the FS-LASIK group and 95.8%, 100%, and 100% in the SMILE group, respectively. For 75% of eyes in the FS-LASIK Xtra group and 100% of eyes in the SMILE Xtra group, the achieved MRSE was within ±1.00D of attempted correction. The LASIK Xtra group had a significantly higher mean MRSE than the SMILE Xtra group at 3 and 12 months after surgery (P=0.006, 0.01), and the SMILE Xtra group had significantly higher K1 and K2 values than the FS-LASIK group at one month after surgery (P=0.024, 0.023). Corneal thickness decreased significantly at one month postoperatively and started to increase over the next 12 months in both groups (P=0.001). The biomechanical properties showed no significant intergroup differences at the 12-month follow-up. Conclusions FS-LASIK Xtra and SMILE Xtra are safe and effective in the correction of myopia and myopia astigmatism, and both procedures have the same effect on postoperative corneal morphology and biomechanics.

Visual outcome after Femtolasik vs. ICL for correction of high myopia

ObjectivesTo compare visual outcomes between femtosecond Lasik and implantable collamer lens (ICL) in patients with high myopia.BackgroundEven though the parameters for optical quality as well as intraocular scattering are valuable for the subsequent satisfaction and postoperative visual performance in myopia, the comparison between patients with Femtolasik (FS-Lasik) and ICL implantation of these parameters is still unclear.Materials and methodsThis study involved 50 high myopic eyes ≥−6.0 D recruited for FS-Lasik (group 1) and another 50 high myopic eyes recruited for ICL (group 2). Both age and sex were matched in the two groups.ResultsVisual acuities (VA) showed significant improvement in FS-Lasik group than ICL group 1 day postoperatively, whereas after 1 week, they had no difference (P > 0.05), but in the third and sixth months postoperatively, there was a statistically significant increase in VA in ICL group than FS-Lasik group. It was observed that there is a stability of VA after FS-Lasik and ICL groups, which indicated that eyes with FS-Lasik group tend to regress by time, whereas in ICL group, the line tends to be more stable. However, both groups showed highly significant improvement in VA (P < 0.001).ConclusionICL implantation is a better first choice especially in young adults who had high myopia and need the near vision. ICL seems to be better than FS-Lasik in the long-lasting correction of vision, and also, it has a better durability.

Comparison between Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Wavefront-Guided Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis in Correction of Myopic Astigmatism

Abstract Aim of the Work To compare visual acuity, refractive and topographic outcome between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and wavefront-guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (WFG FS-LASIK) in patients with myopic astigmatism. Patients and methods This prospective, non-randomized, comparative clinical study included 60 eyes of 30 patients with simple or compound myopic astigmatism presenting for refractive error correction. Femtosecond assisted LASIK group included 30 eyes and SMILE group included 30 eyes. The following tests were done for all patients preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively: full ophthalmological examination, manifest refraction, UDVA, CDVA, corneal topography using combined schimflug and placcido disc imaging namely Pentacam. (Oculus Inc.) and wavefront analysis using ATLAS 9000 (Carl Zeiss Meditec) Main Outcome Measures: Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected disctance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, Efficacy, safety, predictability, corneal higher order aberrations. Results At 3 months, the mean manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) in SMILE group was -0.33 ± 0.34 D and the mean MRSE in FS- LASIK group was 0.23 ± 0.35 D and there was a statistically significant difference between both groups (P &amp;lt; 0.05). mean postoperative cylinder was -0.56 ± 0.28 D in SMILE group and -0.53 ± 0.38D in FS-LASIK with statistically significant difference ( P = 0.254 ) 93% and 93% of eyes in the SMILE and FS-LASIK groups were within ± 0.5 D; 96.67% and 100% of eyes in the SMILE and FS-LASIK groups, respectively, were within ± 1 D. There were 86.66% of treated eyes in the SMILE group, and 93.33% treated eyes in the FS-LASIK group that had 20/25 or better UDVA. Regarding safety, the CDVA in the SMILE group, 20 eyes (66.67%) showed no change, 8 eyes (27%) gained 1 line, 2 eyes (7%) lost 1 line, and no eyes lost more than 1 line. whereas in the FS-LASIK group, 27 eyes (90%) exhibited no change, 2 eyes (6.66%) gained 1 line, 1 eye (3.33%) lost 1 line, and no eyes lost more than 1 line and There was no statistically significant difference between both groups (P = 0. 554 ). Regarding corneal asphericity, both procedures increased Q-value with no statistically significant difference between both groups (P = 0. 052). Regarding corneal higher order aberrations, both procedures significantly increased total corneal aberrations but there was no statistically significant difference in the change in RMS of total corneal higher order aberration (P = 0.434) .but SMILE increased RMS of coma aberration significantly more than FS-LASIK (P = 0. 029). Conclusion both SMILE and FS-LASIK procedures have shown excellent efficacy, safety, and predictability for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. SMILE was closer to emmetropia regarding sphere and spherical equivalent, However, astigmatic undercorrection was noted after both surgeries with increased astigmatism. Both procedures increased the total corneal higher order aberrations with no statistically significant difference between both groups. A higher vertical coma was found in SMILE than WFG FS-LASIK.

Comparison Between the Effect of Femtosecond Laser in situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and Femtosecond Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (FS-SMILE) on the Corneal Endothelium.

PurposeTo compare the effect of FS-LASIK and FS-SMILE on the corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) and morphology.Patients and MethodsThis is a prospective, cohort observational study that included 80 eyes of two equal groups of patients. Forty eyes were subjected to the FS-LASIK, and 40 eyes were subjected to the FS-SMILE. In both groups, patients, age ranged between 19 and 37 years with myopia ranges from −0.75 to −9.00 diopters (D) and astigmatism up to −3.00D. The ECD, coefficient of variation (CV), and hexagonality (HEX) in both groups were compared over six months. Specular microscopy was used to evaluate the corneal endothelium throughout the study.ResultsIn both groups, ECD showed a statistically significant decrease while CV showed a statistically significant increase in the first month postoperatively. The FS-SMILE had more impact on both ECD and CV until the third and six months, respectively. Hexagonality showed a significant decrease in both groups throughout the whole study. In both groups, no vision-threatening complications occurred, and no eyes developed any corneal complications over a six-month follow-up period.ConclusionAlthough the ECD, CV, HEX are statistically affected in both FS-LASIK and FS-SMILE groups, both procedures have no significant adverse effects on the ECD and morphology. The impact of the FS-SMILE group may be due to the deeper penetration of the femto laser in the corneal tissue compared to the FS-LASIK. The closer the femto laser to the endothelium, the more exposure to the shock waves and heat energy, although minimal but it can cause collateral damage to this layer. The effects of FS-SMILE surgery on corneal endothelial cells and morphology need further investigations.

Comparison between Femtosecond Assisted LASIK and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Correction of Myopia

Objective: To compare Fs-LASIK and Fs-SMILE in terms of efficacy, safety, predictability. Also comparing the effect of both procedures in dry eye parameters, corneal higher order aberrations and corneal asphericity. Methods: Our study is a prospective, non-randomized, comparative clinical study will be applied on patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism. This study includes 60-eyes that were recruited from El Mashreq Eye Hospital presented for refractive error correction. Fs- LASIK group included 30-eyes and SMILE group included 30-eyes. Results: There was a non-statistically significant difference between both procedures in efficacy, safety and predictability. 86.67% of treated eyes in the SMILE group, and 93.33% of treated eyes in the FS-LASIK group, respectively, had 20/20 or better UDVA. Dry eye was manifested in less degree after SMILE procedure in comparison with Fs-LASIK. Both Fs-LASIK and Fs-SMILE increased total corneal higher order aberrations, spherical aberrations and coma aberration, but there was a non-statistically significant difference between both procedures. Fs-SMILE induced more coma aberration, probably due to the decentration and Fs-LASIK induced more spherical aberrations, but these results were statistically non-significant. Conclusion: The results in both procedures are matching and comparable but a further contralateral fellow eye studies is needed to have a homogenous preoperative matching and avoid bias. Keywords: Femtosecond Assisted LASIK; Lenticule Extraction (SMILE); Myopia

Comparison of refractive outcomes and high-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for correcting high myopia and myopic astigmatism.

To compare the results of using small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and wavefront-guided femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (WFG FS-LASIK) to correct high myopia and myopic astigmatism. The 94 eyes of 47 patients with high myopia or myopic astigmatism, if not both, who had undergone SMILE were compared with the 94 eyes of 47 patients with high myopia or myopic astigmatism, also if not both, who had undergone WFG FS-LASIK. Only eyes with high myopic or myopic astigmatism errors greater than - 6.0 diopter (D) spherical refraction and 0-3 D cylindrical refraction were included. Values of uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, efficacy index, safety index, predictability, and high-order aberration between the patient groups were compared. The SMILE and WFG FS-LASIK groups did not significantly differ according to sex or age. Values of preoperative and postoperative spherical refraction, cylindrical refraction, spherical equivalent, uncorrected distance visual acuity, and corrected distance visual acuity between the groups also did not significantly differ nor did values of predictability, the efficacy index, or the safety index. SMILE induced more coma and trefoil (p < 0.001), whereas WFG FS-LASIK induced more spherical aberration (p < 0.001). Both SMILE and WFG FS-LASIK are efficient, safe, predictable procedures for correcting high myopia and myopic astigmatism. SMILE may induce more coma and trefoil, whereas WFG FS-LASIK may induce more spherical aberration.

Quality of life impact of refractive correction (QIRC) results three years after SMILE and FS-LASIK

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare long-term postoperative quality of life and satisfaction differences between SMILE and FS-LASIK for myopia correction.MethodsThis cross-sectional study enrolled patients under the age of 39 years, who chose to undergo SMILE or FS-LASIK surgery to both eyes 3 years previously. Patients completed a common vision test and Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire, together with the surgical satisfaction, adverse symptoms subjective survey. Patients with preoperative corrected distance visual acuity and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or greater were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match the preoperative and postoperative spherical equivalent, age, and designed optical zones of the left and right eyes between the two groups.ResultsForty-nine patients were included in each group after PSM from 188 patients. No significant difference in the total QIRC score was found between the SMILE and FS-LASIK groups (45.89 ± 5.91 vs 45.09 ± 5.65, p = 0.492). There were no differences in surgical satisfaction between the groups (p = 0.178). Compared to the SMILE group, the FS-LASIK group had more glare (2.12 ± 2.25 vs 3.22 ± 2.54, p = 0.026) and severe dryness (1.80 ± 1.98 vs 2.79 ± 2.19, p = 0.021).ConclusionPostoperative quality of life is similar after SMILE or FS-LASIK. Dry eye symptoms and glare were milder in the SMILE group than in the FS-LASIK group.

Predictors of Myopic Regression for Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted in Situ Keratomileusis Flap Creation with Mechanical Microkeratome and Femtosecond Laser in Low and Moderate Myopia

ABSTRACTPurpose: To determine the predictive factors of postoperative myopic regression in subjects who have undergone laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with flaps created using a mechanical microkeratome (MM) or LASIK with flaps created using a femtosecond (FS) laser for −0.50 D to −6.0 D myopia.Materials and Methods: This study was designed as a retrospective comparison. We included 236 eyes in the LASEK group, 1,178 eyes in the MM-LASIK group and 1,333 eyes in the FS-LASIK group. Refractive outcomes were recorded at one day; one week; and one, three, six and 12 months postoperatively. Predictors affecting myopic regression and other covariates were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model for the three methods of surgery.Results: At 12 months, the survival rates (no myopic regression) were 63.36%, 74% and 77% in the MM-LASIK, LASEK, and FS-LASIK groups, respectively. Risk factors for myopic regression were indicated for patients with greater preoperative central corneal thicknesses (CCT) (P = .02), female patients (P < .01), patients with aspherical ablations (P = .01) and those with larger transitional zones (TZ) (P < .01). Among the three surgeries, MM-LASIK had a significantly higher probability of postoperative myopic regression (P < .01). Longer durations of myopia (P = .03), steeper corneal curvatures (Kmax) (P < .01) and larger optical zones (OZ) (P < .01) were protective factors.Conclusion: MM-LASIK had the highest risk for myopic regression. OZ, TZ, aspherical ablations, preoperative corneal curvatures and being a female patient had significant influence on myopic regression in −0.50 D to −6.0 D myopia.

Predictors affecting myopic regression in \u2212\u20096.0D to \u2212\u200910.0D myopia after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with femtosecond laser-assisted or mechanical microkeratome-assisted

PurposeTo investigate the predictive factors of postoperative myopic regression among subjects who have undergone laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap created with a mechanical microkeratome (MM), and LASIK flap created with a femtosecond laser (FS). All recruited patients had a manifest spherical equivalence (SE) from − 6.0D to − 10.0D myopia.MethodsThis retrospective, observational case series study analyzed outcomes of refraction at 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Predictors affecting myopic regression and other covariates were estimated with the Cox proportional hazards model for the three types of surgeries.ResultsThe study enrolled 496 eyes in the LASEK group, 1054 eyes in the FS-LASIK group, and 910 eyes in the MM-LASIK group. At 12 months, from − 6.0D to − 10.0D myopia showed that the survival rates (no myopic regression) were 52.19%, 59.12%, and 58.79% in the MM-LASIK, FS-LASIK, and LASEK groups, respectively. Risk factors for myopic regression included thicker postoperative central corneal thickness (P ≦ 0.01), older age (P ≦ 0.01), aspherical ablation (P = 0.02), and larger transitional zone (TZ) (P = 0.03). Steeper corneal curvature (Kmax) (P = 0.01), thicker preoperative central corneal thickness (P < 0.01), smaller preoperative myopia (P < 0.01), longer duration of myopia (P = 0.02), with contact lens (P < 0.01), and larger optical zone (OZ) (P = 0.02) were protective factors. Among the three groups, the MM-LASIK had the highest risk of postoperative myopic regression (P < 0.01).ConclusionsThe MM-LASIK group experienced the highest myopic regression, followed by the FS-LASIK and LASEK groups. Older age, aspheric ablation used, thicker postoperative central corneal thickness, and enlarging TZ contribute to myopic regression; steeper preoperative corneal curvature (Kmax), longer duration of myopia, with contact lens, thicker preoperative central corneal thickness, lower manifest refraction SE, and enlarging OZ prevent postoperative myopic regression in myopia from − 6.0D to − 10.0D.

Evaluation of femtosecond laser in flap and cap creation in corneal refractive surgery for myopia: a 3-year follow-up.

PurposeTo evaluate femtosecond laser in flap and cap creation, detect some corneal biomechanical changes, and evaluate dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), Femto-LASIK, and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with 3-year follow-up.Patients and methodsPreoperative evaluation taken: full ophthalmic examination, Pentacam, ocular response analyzer, ocular surface disease index (OSDI), and tear breakup time (TBUT). LASIK flap was created using Moria microkeratome in 30 eyes (LASIK group) and using VisuMax femtosecond laser in 38 eyes (FS-LASIK group) and SMILE was done by VisuMax in 35 eyes (SMILE group). Postoperative evaluation: anterior segment optical coherence tomography to measure flap and cap thickness, ocular response analyzer to measure corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF), OSDI, and TBUT at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery.ResultsThis study included 103 eyes of 103 patients. The mean deviation of central cap or flap thickness from intended was statistically higher in the LASIK group (P<0.001). Both CH and CRF showed significant reduction postoperatively but were significantly higher in the SMILE group during follow up (P<0.05). The mean OSDI scores were significantly elevated in all groups postoperatively (P<0.01) but were significantly lower in the SMILE group 3 months postoperatively (P<0.05). The mean TBUT was significantly decreased in all groups postoperatively (P<0.01) but was significantly higher in the SMILE group 6 months postoperatively (P<0.05).ConclusionFemtosecond laser is more accurate than microkeratomes. CH and CRF changes were least after SMILE. The three procedures led to significant dryness but for shorter duration with SMILE.

Change of tear osmolarity after refractive surgery

Purpose: To compare the influence of the LASIK and ReLEx SMILE refractive method on tear osmolarity Methods: Prospective non-randomized comparative study. We evaluated the results in two groups of patients who underwent binocular refractive surgery to remove myopia and possibly astigmatism in the eye clinic of Horní Počernice. In each group were 15 patients (30 eyes), patients of one group undergoing FS-LASIK refractive surgery, in the second group a ReLEx SMILE procedure. Bilateral measurement of the tear film osmolarity using the TearLab instrument on the day of surgery, the first day after surgery, one month and 3 months after surgery was performed on each patient. Results: The mean preoperative value of the osmolarity of the tear film was practically the same in both groups, in the ReLEx SMILE group 294.9 ± 13.4 mOsm/l and in the FS-LASIK group 296.4 ± 13.1. One and three months after the surgery in the ReLEx SMILE group, these values increased to 301.4 and 296.4 ± 13.3 mOsm/l respectively, the elevation of values one month after surgery was statistically significant. In the FS-LASIK group, one month after surgery, the osmolarity was 320.1 ± 14.7, three months postoperatively 306.5 ± 13.1 mOsm / l. Both of these values compared to the preoperative value were statistically significantly higher. The increase of the mean osmolarity was statistically significantly higher in the FS-LASIK group compared to the ReLEx SMILE. Three months after surgery, the difference between groups was not statistically significant. Conclusion: In our group of patients, after the FS-LASIK refraction procedure, we noted a higher mean osmolarity of tear film in comparison with patients after the ReLEx SMILE in all evaluated timepoints (1 day, 1 month and 3 months after surgery). We consider ReLEx SMILE as a method with less impact on the quality of tear film, with a faster return to original osmolarity and potentially higher patient comfort. Key words: Tear osmolarity, Relex SMILE, FS-LASIK.

Aberration compensation between anterior and posterior corneal surfaces after Small incision lenticule extraction and Femtosecond laser-assisted laser in-situ keratomileusis.

To investigate the aberration compensation between anterior and posterior corneal surfaces after SMILE and FS-LASIK. Fifty-five subjects (55 eyes) undergoing SMILE and 51 subjects (51 eyes) undergoing FS-LASIK were enrolled in this study. Wavefront aberrations of anterior and posterior corneal surfaces and the whole cornea at 6 mm in diameter were measured using a Scheimpflug Camera preoperatively and one, three and 6 months postoperatively. The compensation factor (CF), where CF = 1 - (aberration of the whole cornea/aberration of anterior corneal surface), was calculated. Spherical aberration of the posterior surface and the whole cornea remained stable after SMILE. However, spherical aberration of posterior surface increased significantly at 6 months in the FS-LASIK group. The total higher-order aberration (tHOA) of the anterior surface and the whole cornea was lower at 6 months than at one and 3 months (p = 0.001 and 0.001, respectively) in the FS-LASIK group. Meanwhile, in the SMILE group, no significant difference in tHOA was found between various postoperative time points. There were significant decreases in the CF of tHOA compared with preoperative values in both groups. The CF of spherical aberration reduced significantly in both groups at 3 and 6 mm in diameter one, three and 6 months postoperatively. Significant decreases in the CF of vertical coma were found at three and 6 months postoperatively in the FS-LASIK group compared with preoperative values at 6 mm in diameter (p = 0.021 and 0.008, respectively). The change in CF (ΔCF) of spherical aberration was smaller in the SMILE group than in the FS-LASIK group at one and 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.003 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The ΔCF of spherical aberration was significantly lower in moderately myopic subjects than in subjects with high myopia at 1 month in the SMILE group (p = 0.041) and at one, three and 6 months in the FS-LASIK group (p = 0.014, 0.020, and 0.004, respectively). The posterior corneal surface plays an important role in compensating for spherical aberration of the anterior corneal surface. The compensation mechanisms of spherical aberration and higher-order aberration between anterior and posterior corneal surfaces were disrupted by the SMILE and the FS-LASIK procedures. The change in the CF of spherical aberration was smaller in the SMILE group compared with the FS-LASIK group, especially in subjects with high myopia.

Characteristics of straylight after small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis

Background Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) was a new procedure which is mini-invasion and flapless,but few attentions were paid to the visual quality after SMILE.To understand the changes of intraocular straylight after SMILE is of important significance for the assession of the visual quality after the procedure. Objective This study was to compare the characteristic of straylight between SMILE and femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LAISK) after surgery. Methods A retrospective study was designed.Written informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to accepting the surgery.One hundred and twenty-seven eyes of 68 patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism were included in Tianjin Eye Hospital from January 2011 to July 2013.SMILE was performed on 64 eyes of 35 patients and FS-LASIK was carried out in 63 eyes of 33 patients at the same period.Stray light was detected with C-Quant stray light meter before and 1 week,1 month and 6 months after surgery.The changes of stray light values following the surgery were compared between the two groups,and the correlations between postoperative stray light values with operative parameters were analyzed. Results The mean stray light values were (1.03±0.19)D and (0.95±0.16)D at 1 week and 1 month after surgery,which were higher than (0.88±0.18)D at preoperation in the FS-LASIK group (P=0.000,0.012).The stray light values were (0.98±0.16),(0.95±0.14) and (0.94±0.16)D at 1 week,1 month or 6 months after surgery,and no statistically significant differences were found in comparison with (0.91±0.15)D in preoperation in the SMILE group (all at P>0.05).No significant intergroup difference was seen in the stray light values (Fgroup=0.077,P=0.781).The stray light differences of various time points after surgery and before surgery were increased in the FS-LASIK group compared with SMILE group (Fgroup=14.798,P<0.001),with the significant difference in postoperative 1 week between the two groups (P<0.01).The negative correlations were found between stray light values at 1 week,1 month and 6 months after SMILE with the lenticule thickness/central corneal thickness (CCT) (R2=0.123,0.145,0.098,all at P<0.05) or between stray light change. Conclusions Intraocular stray light appears less change in operative eyes after SMILE. However, intraocular stray light increases in the eyes received FS-LASIK, especially at early stage after operation. The stray light shifts return to normal with the lapse of postoperative time. Key words: Straylight; Myopia, myopia astigmatism/surgery; Visual quality; Small incision lenticule extraction; Femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis

Comparison of the Visual Results After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia

To perform a comparative clinical analysis of the safety, efficacy, and predictability of two surgical procedures (ie, small incision lenticule extraction [SMILE] and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK [FS-LASIK]) to correct myopia. Sixty eyes of 31 patients with a mean spherical equivalent of -5.13 ± 1.75 diopters underwent myopia correction with the SMILE procedure. Fifty-one eyes of 27 patients with a mean spherical equivalent of -5.58 ± 2.41 diopters were treated with the FS-LASIK procedure. Postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, and higher-order aberrations were analyzed statistically at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. No statistically significant differences were found at 1 and 3 months in parameters that included the percentage of eyes with an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better (P = .556, .920) and mean spherical equivalent refraction (P = .055, .335). At 1 month, 4 SMILE-treated eyes and 1 FS-LASIK-treated eye lost one or more line of visual acuity (P = .214, chi-square test). At 3 months, 2 SMILE-treated eyes lost one or more line of visual acuity, whereas all FS-LASIK-treated eyes had an unchanged or corrected distance visual acuity. Higher-order aberrations and spherical aberration were significantly lower in the SMILE group than the FS-LASIK group at 1 (P = .007, .000) and 3 (P = .006, .000) months of follow-up. SMILE and FS-LASIK are safe, effective, and predictable surgical procedures to treat myopia. SMILE has a lower induction rate of higher-order aberrations and spherical aberration than the FS-LASIK procedure.