Frozen Elephant Trunk Group Research Articles

Optimal size of Frozenix for true thoracic aneurysms: is downsizing an option?

During total arch replacement (TAR) using frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique with Frozenix for true thoracic aortic aneurysm (tTAA), oversized FET tends to be chosen similar to the endovascular devise selection. However, the oversized FET is considered a risk factor for intimal injury. The appropriate size selection of FET remains insufficiently understood. Between October 2014 and March 2022, a total of 49 patients underwent TAR using Frozenix for tTAA. Out of 49 patients, four patients planned to staged surgery were excluded, 19 patients were operated on with an undersized Frozenix compared with the descending aorta (undersized FET group) and in 26 patients an equal or oversized Frozenix was used (oversized FET group). Clinical outcomes and postoperative diameter changes were investigated. In-hospital mortality was 0%. The mean diameter of Frozenix and the descending aorta was 30.7mm and 28.8mm, respectively, in the oversized FET group, and 26.7mm and 30.1mm in the undersized FET group. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) demonstrated no endoleaks not only in the oversized FET group but also in the undersized FET group. CT also revealed that undersized FET had expanded more than the original diameter in all cases except for two, with an average of 2.47 ± 1.53mm. Additionally, the descending aorta covered with Frozenix shrank in 10 patients (53%). Postoperative adverse aortic events were not observed. Undersized Frozenix tightly fit the descending aorta and resulted in complete sealing without endoleaks. Oversized FET is not strictly necessary considering the size-related adverse complications.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Reconstructed Time-To-Event Data of Frozen Elephant Trunk and Conventional Aortic Repair.

Frozen elephant trunk (FET) has gained popularity since its inception. Nevertheless, the optimal approach for managing aortic arch pathologies remains subject of debate. This meta-analysis compared outcomes between patients undergoing FET and those undergoing conventional aortic repair. Systematic searches were conducted up to February 2024. Pooled results of short and long-term outcomes were computed. A systematic review identified 21 non-randomized studies encompassing 3240 patients. Short-term mortality was lower in FET recipients than in those undergoing conventional repair (OR [95% CI] = 0.58 [0.44-0.78], P < .01). Postoperative paraplegia incidence was higher in the FET cohort (OR = 1.85 [1.02-3.34], P = .04), while subgroup analysis showed no difference between the two groups in patients with acute aortic dissection. Long-term all-cause mortality was lower among FET recipients. Subgroup analysis showed FET was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (HR = 0.55 [0.39-0.79], P < .01) and aortic re-intervention (HR = 0.62 [0.39-0.99], P = .05) in acute aortic dissection patients. This meta-analysis underscores the favorable association between the utilization of FET and improved short and long-term outcomes compared with conventional repair, while paraplegia incidence was higher in the FET group. FET appears to offer superior benefits, particularly evident in patients with acute aortic dissection.

The frozen elephant trunk technique in acute aortic dissection: the ultimate solution? An institutional experience.

Acute aortic dissection remains a serious emergency in the field of cardiovascular medicine and a challenge for cardiothoracic surgeons. In the present study, we seek to compare the outcomes of different surgical techniques in the repair of type A acute aortic dissection. Between April 2015 and May 2023, 213 patients (82 women, aged: 63.9 ± 13.3 years) with acute aortic dissection (205 type A and 8 non-A-non-B dissections) underwent surgical treatment in our department. A total of 45 patients were treated with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique supported by the Thoraflex™ Hybrid prosthesis, 33 received total aortic arch replacement (TAR)-standard or conventional elephant trunk-treatment, and 135 were treated with hemiarch replacement (HR). Aortic arch surgery was performed in most patients under moderate hypothermic (28°C on average) circulatory arrest, with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion through the right axillary artery. The rates of early mortality were 17.8% (38 perioperative deaths) in the whole population, 8.9% in the FET group of patients, and 33% and 17% in the TAR and HR group of patients, respectively (P-value 0.025). The rate of spinal cord injury was 2.3% (five patients), and a paresis of recurrent laryngeal occurred in 3.7% of patients (seven patients, four were treated with FET). Permanent neurological dysfunction occurred in 27 patients (12.7%). After a mean follow-up of 3 years, the rate of mid-term mortality of discharged patients was 19.4% (34 deaths: 7 FET, 4 TAR, and 23 HR) and the overall mortality rate was 33.8% [72 deaths: 11 FET (24.4%); 15 TAR (45.4%); 46 HR (34.1%)]. A total of 8 patients (17.8%) in whom FET was applied received additional endovascular treatment in the descending aorta. In our institutional experience, we found that the frozen elephant trunk technique with a high-end Thoraflex Hybrid prosthesis proved its surgical suitability in the treatment of acute aortic dissection with favorable outcomes. The FET technique and our perioperative management led to comparable neurological outcomes and reduced mortality rates in these emergency cases.

Inflammation in aortic surgery: postoperative evolution of biomarkers according pathologies and segments of the aorta

ObjectivesAortic pathologies often present with elevated inflammatory biomarkers due to the nature of the disease. Open aortic surgery causes significant trauma to the body due to often mandatory ischemic periods, long cardiopulmonary bypass times and polytransfusion. We aim to determine postoperative trends on inflammation biomarkers for different aortic pathologies and type of surgery in different segments of the aorta.MethodsRetrospective review of prospectively collected data of 193 consecutive patients who underwent aortic surgery in our centre between 2017 and 2021, grouped according to the type of aortic intervention: (1) Type A aortic dissection (AD) repair with ascending aorta/hemiarch replacement, (2) Aortic root replacement (ARR), (3) Aortic arch + Frozen elephant trunk (FET), (4) Descending thoracic aorta (DTA)/Thoraco-Abdominal aortic repair (TAA). Primary outcomes were daily values of white blood cells (WBC) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) during the first 15 postoperative days.ResultsAll groups had a similar inflammatory peak in the first 2–4 days (WBC 12-15 × 109 c/L). AD and FET groups show similar trends with WBC and CRP peaks on days 2 and 10. The ARR group didn’t experience the 2nd peak as most patients were already discharged. DTA/TAA patients experienced a more prolonged inflammatory response, reaching a plateau by day 5–10. AD group shows the highest WBC levels and the DTA/TAAA group the highest CRP levels. CRP levels remain elevated (100–200 mg/L) in all groups after 15 postoperative days.ConclusionsInflammatory biomarkers show different postoperative trends depending on the clinical presentation and complexity of the aortic procedure performed. Further understanding of the inflammatory response to different aortic pathologies and surgical procedures will permit reduction on the liberal use of antibiotics that this cohort of patients are usually exposed to. An earlier version of the data included in this manuscript was presented as Oral in the UK Society of Cardiothoracic Surgery Annual meeting in 2021

Frozen elephant trunk versus conventional proximal repair of acute aortic dissection type I.

The extent of surgery and the role of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) for surgical repair of acute aortic dissection type I are still subjects of debate. The aim of the study is to evaluate the short- and long-term results of acute surgical repair of aortic dissection type I using the FET compared to standard proximal aortic repair. Between October 2009 and December 2016, 172 patients underwent emergent surgery for acute type I aortic dissection at our center. Of these, n = 72 received a FET procedure, while the other 100 patients received a conventional proximal aortic repair. Results were compared between the two surgery groups. The primary endpoints included 30-day rates of mortality and neurologic deficit and follow-up rates of mortality and aortic-related reintervention. Demographic data were comparable between the groups, except for a higher proportion of men in the FET group (76.4% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.03). The median age was 62 years [IQR (20), p = 0.17], and the median log EuroSCORE was 38.6% [IQR (31.4), p = 0.21]. The mean follow-up time was 68.3 ± 33.8 months. Neither early (FET group 15.3% vs. proximal group 23.0%, p = 0.25) nor late (FET group 26.2% vs. proximal group 23.0%, p = 0.69) mortality showed significant differences between the groups. There were fewer strokes in the FET patients (FET group 2.8% vs. proximal group 11.0%, p = 0.04), and the rates of spinal cord injury were similar between the groups (FET group 4.2% vs. proximal group 2.0%, p = 0.41). Aortic-related reintervention rates did not differ between the groups (FET group 12.1% vs. proximal group 9.8%, p = 0.77). Emergent FET repair for acute aortic dissection type I is safe and feasible when performed by experienced surgeons. The benefits of the FET procedure in the long term remain unclear. Prolonged follow-up data are needed.

Strategy for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection considering midterm results: a retrospective cohort study comparing ascending aortic replacement and total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk technique

BackgroundAcute type A aortic dissection is treated with an emergency procedure that uses ascending aortic replacement (AAR). However, to avoid a residual dissected aorta with a false lumen, total arch replacement (TAR) is required. The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique is a promising surgical approach that promotes false lumen obliteration in a single step. Therefore, this retrospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the operative outcomes of AAR and TAR with FET.MethodsBetween 2007 and 2021, 143 patients with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection underwent a central repair using AAR (n = 95) or TAR with FET (n = 43). All perioperative variables, the duration of all-cause mortality, and aortic events defined as dilatation of the distal aorta > 5 cm, new occurrences of aortic dissection, distal aortic surgery, and distal aortic rupture were recorded. We compared these perioperative variables and mid-term results with an additional focus on distal aortic events.ResultsPatient background data did not differ between the two groups. Perioperative results for the TAR with FET group vs the AAR group showed similar operative times (306 vs 298 min, P = 0.862), but the TAR group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass times (154 vs 179 min, P < 0.001). The freedom from all-cause death for the TAR vs AAR groups using the Kaplan–Meier method was 81.9% vs 85.4% and 78.0% vs 85.4% (P = 0.407) at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Freedom from aorta-related events was 90.6% vs 97.6% and 69.3% vs 87.0% (P = 0.034) at 1 and 3 years, respectively.ConclusionsTAR with FET had comparable perioperative results to AAR in acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection and was considered a valuable method to avoid aorta-related events in the midterm.

Outcomes of two-stage type II hybrid aortic arch repair in elderly patients with acute type A aortic dissection

Acute type A aortic dissection (a-TAAD) is a severe disease characterized by high mortality, which can be fatal in elderly patients. The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of two-stage type II hybrid aortic arch repair (HAR) in elderly patients with acute type A aortic dissection (a-TAAD). This was a single-center, retrospective study involving 119 patients with a-TAAD, including 82 males and 37 females, aged 22–81 years old. Eighty-eight patients underwent total aortic arch replacement (TAR) with frozen elephant trunk (FET) implantation (TAR with FET group) and 31 patients underwent two-stage type II HAR (HAR group). Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for preoperative data, and match 25 pairs. The preoperative, perioperative, postoperative and follow-up data were recorded. Fifteen patients died during the perioperative period; 13 cases were in the TAR with FET group and 2 cases were in the HAR group. The age, body mass index, cerebral infarction, renal insufficiency were significantly higher, and the 24-h fluid drainage, the incidence of acute liver injury, acute kidney injury and pulmonary infection were lower in the HAR group (all P < 0.05). Moreover, the mechanical ventilation time, intensive care unit time, hospital stay time were shorter in the HAR group (all P < 0.05). The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 54 months, with 7 deaths (9.3%) in the TAR with FET group and 2 deaths (6.9%) in the HAR group. The true lumen of the aortic arch and the middle descending thoracic aorta were larger and the false lumen thrombosis rates of the middle descending thoracic aorta and renal artery level were higher in the HAR group (all P < 0.05). Two-stage type II HAR is a safe and effective method for the treatment of elderly patients with a-TAAD. It may be a good choice for elderly patients with a-TAAD and comorbidities.

Branching externalized guidewire to facilitate retrograde endograft deployment in the hybrid aortic repair with aortic valve replacement

BackgroundThe hybrid aortic repair consisting of root replacement and endovascular arch repair is an optimal alternative for patients unfit for circulatory arrest. However, an artificial aortic valve prosthesis might impede the endovascular procedure. This study aims to present our experience with the branching retrograde externalized guidewire (BREG) technique in such situations, and discuss its utility and efficiency. MethodsFrom January 2015 to June 2021, a total of 112 patients underwent aortic root/valve replacement combined with aortic arch repair. Among them, the BREG technique was adopted on 24 patients, and the traditional frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique was used for 88 patients. The indication of the BREG was as follows: high-risk patients not suitable for traditional open surgery; meanwhile, the aortic disease required extended repair, and the aortic valve needed to be replaced concomitantly. The data of the 2 groups were compared. ResultsThe cardiopulmonary bypass time (213.5 ± 73.6 min vs. 246.5 ± 46.2 min, P = 0.046) and cross-clamped time (109.0 ± 27.6 min vs. 139.0 ± 24.6 min, P < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the BREG group than that in the FET group. Less operative red blood cell consumption was achieved in the BREG group (6.6 ± 5.7 vs. 9.4 ± 8.0 U, P = 0.046). The 30-day mortality was similar between the 2 groups (8.3% BREG vs. 9.1% FET, P > 0.999). ConclusionThe BREG technique facilitated the advancement of endovascular stent graft, avoided impeding the aortic valve prosthesis in hybrid aortic surgery with aortic valve replacement, and may benefit high-risk patients.

False lumen thrombosis and aneurysmal transformation of the non-operated aorta after surgical treatment of proximal dissection

Background: One of the most feared long-term complications of surgical treatment of proximal aortic dissections is an aneurysm of the non-operated compartments of the aorta.Objective: To conduct a comparative analysis of different methods for surgical treatment of proximal aortic dissections in relation to false lumen thrombosis development in non-operated compartments.Methods: We conducted a simple observational retrospective multicenter study to study the effectiveness of the frozen elephant trunk technique compared with a standard surgical intervention (aggressive hemiarch anastomosis or total aortic arch replacement with a multibranched prosthesis). Our study included 101 patients grouped based on the method of treatment: group 1 for frozen elephant trunk (n = 31); group 2 for thoracic aorta reconstruction by the standard methods (control group, n = 70). Due to the retrospective nature of the study and the disparity of groups by certain characteristics, we used propensity score matching to increase the reliability of the results. All patient data were collected in the preoperative period, from the protocols of surgical interventions, in the postoperative and long-term periods (3-6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years after surgery). All statistical calculations were conducted in the RStudio software, version 0.99.879 (RStudio Inc., Boston, USA).Results: The absence of false lumen thrombosis at the thoracic aorta level persisted after the surgical treatment in half of the patients in the control group (n = 13; 52%) and was not determined in the frozen elephant trunk group. Complete false lumen thrombosis at the thoracic aorta level (level of stent graft placement and distal to the diaphragm) was achieved in more than half of the patients in the frozen elephant trunk group and only in 3 (12%) control patients. Aneurysmal transformation of the non-operated aorta occurred in 12 (48%) patients from group 2 and was absent in group 1.Conclusion: The frozen elephant trunk technique reduces the frequency of aorto-related events to 0% within 3 years compared with the standard approach (32%, P &lt; .005). Patients operated on for proximal aortic dissection using the frozen elephant trunk technique are significantly more likely to have false lumen thrombosis in the thoracic aorta (P = .004), significantly lower incidence of aneurysmal transformation or thoracic aorta growth rate of &gt;5 mm per year in the long-term period (P = .016) compared with those who underwent the standard methods. Received 15 February 2023. Revised 31 July 2023. Accepted 4 August 2023. Funding: The study was carried out within the framework of the grant of the President of the Russian Federation НШ-5096.2022.3 (agreement No. 075-15-2022-823 dated 12.05.2022). Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Contribution of the authorsConception and study design: A.M. Chernyavskiy, M.M. Lyashenko Data collection and analysis: M.M. Lyashenko, A.A. Shadanov, D.S. Panfilov, E.V. SkurikhinaStatistical analysis: M.M. LyashenkoDrafting the article: M.M. LyashenkoCritical revision of the article: A.M. Chernyavskiy, D.A. Sirota, B.N. KozlovFinal approval of the version to be published: A.M. Chernyavskiy, M.M. Lyashenko, D.A. Sirota, A.A. Shadanov, B.N. Kozlov, D.S. Panfilov, E.V. Skurikhina

Comparison of Short and Midterm Aortic Reinterventions in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Treated by Frozen Elephant Trunk or Conventional Arch Repair

Long-term outcomes after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) are related to remodelling of the descending thoracic aorta and aortic reinterventions. We compared the impact of an extensive repair at the index procedure using the Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) technique, versus a conventional arch repair, on long-term remodelling of the descending thoracic and reintervention related to the aorta. Consecutive patients who underwent conventional arch repair (conventional group) or FET repair (FET group) for an ATAAD from September 2018 to November 2021 were included. Patients who died before discharge or were lost to follow-up prior to the first appointment were excluded from the analysis. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography angiography was reconstructed and diameter of the true/false lumen of the remaining aorta was compared up to 1year. Negative (increased total diameter ≥ 5mm) aortic remodelling was collected for each computed tomography angiography, as well as aortic reinterventions. Comparison of demographic, anatomical, and perioperative complications data were performed using Wilcoxon test for continuous variables or Chi-square test for categorical covariates. The Kaplan-Meier method estimator was used to assess survival rates. The Log rank test was used to compare survival curves between the 2 groups. Thirty nine patients were included, 22 in the conventional group and 17 in the FET group (82% males, mean age 60±12 years). In the FET group, distal anastomosis was performed in zone 0 or 1 for 82% of patients using the simplified delivery technique. Median maximum preoperative descending aortic diameter was larger in the FET group (33mm [30; 37] vs. 30mm [28; 32] [P=0.0172]). At 30days, the rate of negative remodelling on the descending thoracic aorta was significantly higher in the conventional group (50%) than in the FET group (8%, P=0.02). At 1year, Kaplan-Meier analysis shown a freedom from descending aortic negative remodeling of 35.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 18.7-66.1%) in conventional group and 44.9% (CI 95% 26.1-77.2%) in FET group with no significant difference. However, early negative remodelling was observed for the conventional group. Within a year, freedom from reintervention was observed for 74.4% (95% CI 57.1-97%) of patients in the conventional group and 75.5 (95% CI 57.1-99.7%) of patients in the FET group with no significant difference. Negative evolution of descending aorta remains a challenge after ATAAD. An extensive repair using the FET technique during the index procedure seems to be associated with satisfying short-term remodelling of descending aorta.

Volume Changes in the Descending Aorta after Frozen Elephant Trunk and Conventional Hemi-Arch Repair after Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

The aim of this study was to compare the mortality rates, re-intervention rates, and volumetric changes in aortas following surgery, in terms of the true lumen and false lumen changes, using conventional hemi-arch repair (CET) and frozen elephant trunk (FET) techniques. During the period from 2015 to 2018, 66 patients underwent surgical treatment for acute aortic dissection (Debakey type 1). Demographic and procedure-related data were evaluated. We measured volumetric change before surgical treatment, at discharge, and at 12- and 24-month time points based on computed tomography angiography. The study cohort was divided into two groups (FET vs. CET). The mean age of the patients was 56.9 ± 9.4 years in the FET group versus 63.6 ± 11 years in the CET group (p = 0.063). The mean follow-up time was 24 ± 6 and 25 ± 5 months for the FET and CET groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the medical histories of the cohorts. The results showed a significant increase in true lumen volume after the FET procedure (within 24 months postoperatively; p = 0.005), and no significant changes in total (p = 0.392) or false lumen (p = 0.659) volumes were noted. After the CET procedure, there were significant increases in total and false lumen volumes (p = 0.013, p = 0.042), while no significant change in true lumen was observed (p = 0.219). The volume increase in true lumen after the FET procedure was higher compared to the CET group at all postoperative time points (at discharge, 12 months, and 24 months) without significant evidence (p = 0.416, p = 0.422, p = 0.268). At two years, the volume increase in false lumen was significantly higher among the CET group compared to the FET group (p = 0.02). The Kaplan–Meier curve analysis showed that patients who underwent the CET procedure underwent significantly more re-interventions due to false lumen expansion of the descending aorta (p = 0.047). Present study results indicate that the true and false lumen changes in the aorta following the FET and CET procedures were different. FET led to a significant increase in true lumen volume, while false lumen volume remained stable; however, after the CET procedure, significant false lumen enlargement was noted at mid-term follow-up time points. The re-intervention rate after CET was higher due to false lumen expansion.

Mortality and neurologic complications after repair of aortic arch pathology with elephant trunk procedures: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique was developed as an alternative to the conventional elephant trunk (cET) procedure for the repair of complex aortic arch pathology. However, short term results between these different procedures are sparsely described. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to compare short term outcomes between FET and cET in the repair of aortic arch pathology. PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus electronic databases were searched for studies comparing performance of FET and cET procedures in patients with aortic arch pathology. The primary outcome of interest was early mortality, defined as 30-day or in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were stroke, and spinal cord ischemia (SCI). Meta-analysis utilizing the random-effects model was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) software, version 5.4. Ten studies, comprising 1481 patients with aortic arch pathology, were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant reduction of early mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.97) in the FET group. For neurologic outcomes, no significant differences were noted in stroke risk between both groups (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.83-1.75), but an increased risk of SCI was present in FET patients (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.05-4.10). FET appears to be associated with a significant lower early mortality, at costs of greater SCI risk. Larger studies are needed to provide confident recommendations towards preferential use of either procedure.

Effects of a frozen elephant trunk on postoperative renal dysfunction in acute type A aortic dissection extending into the renal artery.

We investigated the effects of frozen elephant trunk (FET) implantation on clinical outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) extending into the renal artery (RA). Between May 2016 and April 2021, 136 patients underwent surgery for ATAAD at our hospital. Patients who died within 7 days postoperatively and those without preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) data were excluded from the study. The remaining 125 patients were included in this study. A preoperative CT-documented RA abnormality was found in 53 patients. Clinical outcomes, including renal dysfunction and CT findings, were compared between 29 patients with and 24 patients without the FET prosthesis. Among the 53 patients with RA abnormalities, origin of the RA from the false lumen was the most common type of abnormality. The percentage of men and rate of arch repair were higher, and the operation, cardiopulmonary bypass, and lower body hypothermic circulatory arrest times were longer in the FET than in the non-FET group. Early mortality rates were similar between groups. The incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) was lower in the FET group (35% vs. 67%, p = 0.028). Multivariable analysis showed that FET implantation was associated with a low incidence of AKI (odds ratio: 0.28, 95% confidence interval: 0.08-0.96; p = 0.043). Among the 125 patients with or without RA abnormalities, no predictor of AKI was identified. FET implantation protected against postoperative AKI in patients with ATAAD extension into the RA.

Management and Outcomes of Non-A Non-B Aortic Dissection

The results of best medical treatment (BMT), endovascular based treatment (EBT), and total arch replacement (TAR) with frozen elephant trunk (FET) treatment in a single centre experience were reported in non-A non-B aortic dissection patients. From January 2016 to May 2020, 215 consecutive patients with acute or subacute non-A non-B aortic dissection were enrolled. The primary endpoints were all cause death. Secondary endpoints included follow up adverse aortic event (AE), a composite of the outcomes of dissection related death, rupture, retrograde type A aortic dissection, stent graft induced new entry tear, secondary endoleak, and follow up re-intervention. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate associations between different treatments and outcomes. Among the 215 dissection patients, 127 (59.1%) received EBT, 42 (19.5%) received TAR+ FET, and the remaining 46 (21.4%) received BMT. Thirty day mortality was higher in patients receiving TAR+ FET (7.1%) than in those treated with EBT (1.6%) or BMT (2.2%) (p= .12). However, after a median follow up of 39.1 (27.0 - 50.7) months, no additional death was recorded in the TAR+ FET group, while nine (7.3%) patients died in the EBT group and 14 (31.8%) died in the BMT group (p < .001). Specifically, EBT and TAR+ FET showed no significant difference in midterm mortality rate, follow up AE, and re-intervention for complicated or uncomplicated dissection patients involving zone 2. For patients with uncomplicated non-A non-B aortic dissection involving zone 2, EBT could profoundly decrease the mortality rate, follow up AE and re-intervention when compared with BMT (p < .010 for all), although this difference was not statistically significant between TAR+ FET and BMT. No statistical comparison was performed in patients with zone 1 involvement because of the limited number of patients. It was demonstrated that EBT or TAR+ FET might be a viable strategy for non-A non-B aortic dissection patients.

Comparison of Prognosis Between Hybrid Debranching Surgery and Total Open Arch Replacement With Frozen Elephant Trunk for Type A Acute Aortic Syndrome Patients.

Background: It is unclear whether the total arch replacement (TAR) combined with frozen elephant trunk (FET) implantation and hybrid debranching surgery have a difference in the prognosis of patients with type A acute aortic syndrome (AAS). We attempted to compare the short-term and long-term prognosis of total arch replacement (TAR) combined with frozen elephant trunk (FET) implantation and hybrid debranching surgery in patients with type A acute aortic syndrome (AAS).Methods: From January 2014 to September 2020, a total of 518 patients who underwent TAR with FET surgery and 31 patients who underwent hybrid surgery were included. We analyzed the post-operative mortality and morbidity of complications of the two surgical methods, and we determined 67 patients for subgroup analysis through a 1:2 propensity score match (PSM). We identified risk factors for patient mortality and post-operative neurological complications through multivariate regression analysis.Results: Compared with the TAR with FET group, hybrid surgery could reduce aortic cross-clamp time, reduce intraoperative blood loss and prevent some patients from cardiopulmonary bypass. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the TAR with FET group and the hybrid surgery group (10.6 vs. 9.7%). However, hybrid surgery had increased the incidence of permanent neurological complications in patients (95%CI: 4.7–35.7%, P = 0.001), especially post-operative cerebral infarction (P < 0.001). During the average follow-up period of 31.6 months, there was no significant difference in the 1-year survival rate and 3-year survival rate between the TAR with FET group and the hybrid surgery group (P = 0.811), but hybrid surgery increased the incidence of long-term neurological complications (P < 0.001). In multivariate regression analysis, surgical methods were not a risk factor for post-operative deaths, but hybrid surgery was a risk factor for post-operative neurological complications (P < 0.001).Conclusions: Hybrid surgery is an acceptable treatment for AAS, and its post-operative mortality is similar to FET. But hybrid surgery may increase the risk of permanent neurological complications after surgery, and this risk must be carefully considered when choosing hybrid surgery.

Short- and mid-term outcomes of the frozen elephant-trunk procedure for degenerative aortic arch aneurysm.

The frozen elephant-trunk (FET) procedure is used widely in total aortic arch replacement (TAR) surgery; however, its safety, effectiveness, and long-term outcomes compared with those of the conventional elephant trunk (cET) procedure for degenerative aneurysms are unclear. Between July, 2011 and August, 2019, 126 patients underwent elective total aortic arch replacement at our institution. We compared the short- and mid-term outcomes of 60 patients who underwent the FET procedure (FET group) with those of 66 patients who underwent cET (cET group). The in-hospital mortality rate tended to be lower in the FET group than in the cET group (p = 0.12). There were two cases of paraplegia (3.3%) in the FET group and in none in the cET group. The all-cause mortality at the 3-year follow-up did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.31). The FET group required more unexpected interventions at the surgical site in the mid-term period. FET was associated with a shorter operative time and lower surgical mortality than cET. Although the mid-term total aortic arch replacement outcomes of FET were acceptable, careful imaging observation is necessary because reinterventions were required more frequently.

Outcomes of long versus short stent cronus hybrid prosthesis in type A aortic dissection: A single centre experience.

The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique has become an important tool in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of long FET on spinal cord injury (SCI) and distal aortic remodeling after acute type A aortic dissection based on clinical and radiological outcomes. From January 2018 to November 2019, 158 patients (mean age 51.8 years [range: 32-78 years], 88.6% male) with acute type A aortic dissection were treated by FET with 100 mm (n = 113) or 150 mm (n = 45) open hybrid stent graft prosthesis. Patients were divided into two groups according to the length of FET. The clinical and radiological outcomes of the patients were reviewed retrospectively. Postoperative outcomes did not differ significantly: in-hospital mortality (9.7% vs. 6.7%, p = .758) and SCI (5.3% vs. 2.2%, p = .674). Aortic remodeling, which was evaluated by aortic diameter, true lumen diameter, false lumen (FL) diameter and the rate of FL complete thrombosis, was more positive in long FET group in the descending thoracic aorta during the follow-up period. At the abdominal level, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The long version of FET does not increase the risk of SCI in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. The application of long FET can achieve better results in terms of remodeling of the thoracic aorta in the short- and medium-term follow-up.

Limited vs. extended repair for acute type I aortic dissection: long-term outcomes over a decade in Beijing Anzhen Hospital.

Limited vs. extended repair for acute type I aortic dissection: long-term outcomes over a decade in Beijing Anzhen Hospital.

A Comparison of Frozen Elephant Trunk, Aortic Balloon Occlusion, and Hybrid Repair for Total Arch Replacement

This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of patients treated by total arch replacement (TAR) with frozen elephant trunk (FET), aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) technique and hybrid arch repair (HAR). Between January 2017 and July 2019, 643 consecutive patients with aortic arch diseases were eligible for TAR, including 356 in conventional FET, 112 in ABO based on FET, and 175 in HAR. A retrospective cohort analysis of perioperative results was undertaken, performed with inverse probability weighting. The primary endpoint was composite endpoints included 30-day mortality, stroke, paraplegia, hemodialysis, reintubation, and intra-aortic balloon pump or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and visceral dysfunction was secondary endpoint. Overall in-hospital mortality was 2.2% (FET = 2.5% vs ABO = 0 vs HAR = 2.9%, P= 0.210). Parallel early outcomes were demonstrated among three groups. ABO group was associated with significantly shorter circulatory arrest time (5, IQR 3-7 vs 16, IQR 14-18 minutes, P < 0.001), and a lower incidence of visceral dysfunction compared with FET group (25.1% vs 47.3%, P= 0.003). Patients receiving ABO suffered a significantly lower rate of prolonged ventilation (more than 72 hours; P= 0.014). Furthermore, a tendency toward decreasing composite endpoints was suggested in ABO (7.2%) compared with FET (15.5%, P= 0.061) and HAR (19.8%, P= 0.032). ABO technique obtains considerable early clinical outcomes for TAR compared with conventional FET and HAR, which could be a feasible and effective approach for patients with aortic arch diseases.

The frozen elephant trunk technique for acute retrograde type A aortic dissection: preliminary results.

Our goal was to determine the early and midterm outcomes after total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique compared to those of the conventional elephant trunk (ET) technique for acute retrograde type A aortic dissection. Between 2012 and 2019, a total of 49 patients had total arch replacement for acute retrograde type A aortic dissection. Patients were divided into the conventional ET (n = 17) and FET (n = 32) groups. The false lumen status was evaluated using enhanced computed tomography (CT) 1 week postoperatively. The diameter of the downstream aorta was evaluated annually using CT. The median follow-up period was 29 months. Preoperative data and neurological complications were not significantly different in the 2 groups. The diameter and length of the ET prosthesis were significantly larger and longer in the FET group. The overall early mortality rate was 10.2% (5/49) with no differences between the 2 groups. The mean follow-up period was significantly longer in the conventional ET group. The rates of freedom from aortic events at 3 years were significantly lower in the FET group. At the level of the distal arch, postoperative false lumen patency was significantly lower and the follow-up aortic diameter was significantly smaller in the FET group. The FET technique facilitates false lumen thrombosis and aortic remodelling at the distal arch level, with fewer adverse aortic events during the follow-up period with acceptable early outcomes; however, these findings are exploratory and require investigation.