Egg mass at laying is an important predictor of hatchling mass in birds (Deeming and Birchard 2007; Alabi and others 2012). Hatchling mass, in turn, affects reproductive success; smaller eggs produce smaller chicks, and smaller chicks are less likely to survive (Parsons 1975). Egg mass thus serves as an important measure of parental investment and fitness. For colonial seabirds, egg mass can be determined using a portable scale carried through the colony during nest surveys. In order to receive an accurate reading, however, the scale must rest on a level surface, remain sheltered from the wind, and be recalibrated at each new site. Furthermore, because eggs lose moisture over time and get progressively lighter, an egg should be weighed on the day that it is laid (Romanoff and Romanoff 1949). It is not always possible or convenient to fulfill these requirements for measuring egg mass. In contrast, egg length and width, which remain constant from laying to hatching, can be measured rapidly and accurately in the field with calipers. Several equations for estimating egg mass or volume from length and width have appeared in the literature. Hoyt (1979) estimated fresh egg mass M from length L and width W with the model M~kMLW , in which kM is a speciesspecific parameter. He provided kM values for 26 species, including Western Gulls (Larus occidentalis), for which kM was calculated to be 0.000531 g/mm (n 5 8). For chicken eggs, Narushin (2005) used geometric considerations to obtain the volume model V~ a{bW ð ÞLW, and Abanikannda and others (2007) used a model of the form M~azbLz cWzd(W=L). In this study, we tested these 3 alternative models as well as 3 allometric models for Glaucous-winged Gulls (L. glaucescens). In particular, we: (1) parameterized the models with data collected from a Glaucous-winged Gull colony; (2) selected the best model(s) using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC); and (3) validated the selected model(s), without refitting, on a data set that was not used for parameter estimation. We collected data during the 2009 and 2010 breeding seasons at Protection Island National Wildlife Refuge (486079400 N, 122655900 W), Jefferson County, Washington, USA. Violet Point, a gravel spit extending to the southeast of the main island, contained a breeding colony of 3000 (in 2009) and 2469 (in 2010) pairs of Glaucous-winged Gulls (Cowles and others 2012, and unpubl. data). We selected 5 rectangular sample subareas of the Violet Point colony as shown in Figure 1 of Henson and others (2010; Plots A–E), with a combined sample area of 4205 m. Plot A bordered the beach on the north-central edge of the colony; Plot B was landlocked in the center of the colony; Plot C was at the west end of the colony and bordered the north beach of a small marina closed to the public; Plot D was in the center of the colony and also bordered the north beach of the marina; Plot E was in the center of the colony and bordered the south beach of the marina. Daily, throughout the 2009 and 2010 laying seasons (late May–early July), we monitored all nest cups in the 5 sample areas. When clutch initiation occurred in a nest, we placed a numbered wooden stake near the nest. Each staked nest was checked daily for new eggs. The mass of each egg was measured on the day it was laid using a 400-g capacity Ohaus Scout Pro SP401 portable electronic balance, and each egg was measured with vernier calipers at its widest and longest points. One egg, a ‘dwarf’ whose length (55.9 mm) and width (38.6 mm) were GENERAL NOTES
Read full abstract