Frequent Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Research Articles

Sitravatinib in patients with solid tumors selected by molecular alterations: results from a Phase Ib study.

Aim: We report clinical activity and safety of sitravatinib in patients with advanced cancer from basket cohorts with specific molecular alterations, in a Phase Ib study.Materials & methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors harboring amplification, mutation, or rearrangement of MET, AXL, RET, NTRK, DDR2, KDR, PDGFRA, KIT or CBL received sitravatinib once daily. Primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR).Results: In total, 113 patients were enrolled following a median of 3 (range 1-18) prior systemic regimens. Altered RET (n = 31), CBL (n = 31) and MET (n = 17) were most frequent cohorts. Overall, 68.9% had reduced tumor volume and most (61.5%) had a best objective response of stable disease. ORR was highest in patients with RET-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (21.1%) but did not differ significantly from the null hypothesis (ORR ≤15%; p = 0.316). Median progression-free survival and overall survival (5.7 and 24.2 months, respectively) were also longest in the RET-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer cohort. Diarrhea (61.1%), fatigue (50.4%) and hypertension (46.9%) were the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild-to-moderate in severity. The study closed before the planned number of patients were enrolled in all cohorts.Conclusion: Sitravatinib had a manageable safety profile with modest signals of clinical activity in patients with molecularly selected solid tumors.Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT02219711.

Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Calcifediol Formulations (75 and 100 µg) in Subjects with Vitamin D Deficiency: A Phase II/III Randomised Trial

Background/Objective: Optimal vitamin D levels are required for bone health and proper functionality of the nervous, musculoskeletal and immune systems. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety profiles of new weekly calcifediol formulations with the potential to improve adherence and outcome. Methods: A Phase II-III, double-blind, randomized, multicentre trial (EudraCT 2020-001099-14 and NCT04735926). Subjects were randomized 2:2:1 to calcifediol 75 µg, 100 µg and placebo. 25(OH)D levels were measured at 4, 16, 24, 32 and 52 weeks. The main outcome was the percentage of subjects who achieved a response defined as 25(OH)D levels ≥20 ng/mL and/or ≥30 ng/mL at week 16. Results: 398 subjects (51.1 ± 15.96 years, 74.2% females, 98.7% Caucasian) with plasma 25(OH)D levels between 10 and 20 ng/mL were randomized. A total of 376 subjects completed 16 weeks of treatment, and 355 subjects completed the study. Six patients withdrew due to an adverse event, all unrelated to treatment. At week 16, 93.6% and 74.4% of subjects receiving calcifediol 75 µg achieved response levels of ≥20 ng/mL and ≥30 ng/mL, respectively. The calcifediol 100 µg group showed 98.7% and 89.9% of responders for ≥20 ng/mL and ≥30 ng/mL, respectively. Both calcifediol groups showed superiority over placebo at each response level at all time points analyzed (p < 0.0001). Calcifediol treatments increased 25(OH)D levels from baseline to week 24 and remained stable thereafter. The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was balanced between groups. Conclusions: New weekly calcifediol 75 and 100 µg formulations showed an effective and sustained response with a good long-term safety profile.

Pirtobrutinib monotherapy in Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor-intolerant patients with B-cell malignancies: results of the phase I/II BRUIN trial.

Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have transformed the treatment of B-cell malignancies, but intolerance has often led to their discontinuation. The phase 1/2 BRUIN study evaluated pirtobrutinib, a highly selective non-covalent (reversible) BTKi, in patients with R/R B-cell malignancies (NCT03740529). Pirtobrutinib was investigated in 127 patients with intolerance to at least one prior BTKi therapy in the absence of progressive disease. The most common adverse event (AE) leading to BTKi discontinuation was cardiac disorders (n=40, 31.5%), specifically atrial fibrillation (n=30, 23.6%). The median follow-up was 17.4 months and the median time on pirtobrutinib was 15.3 months. The most common reasons for pirtobrutinib discontinuation were progressive disease (26.8%), AE (10.2%), or death (5.5%). The most frequent treatment-emergent AEs were fatigue (39.4%) and neutropenia (37.0%). Among patients who discontinued a prior BTKi for a cardiac issue, 75% had no recurrence of their cardiac AE. No patient discontinued pirtobrutinib for the same AE that led to discontinuation of the prior BTKi. In 78 CLL/SLL and 21 MCL patients intolerant to prior BTKi, ORR to pirtobrutinib was 76.9% and 81.0%, respectively. Median PFS for CLL/SLL was 28.4 months and was not estimable for MCL. These results suggest that pirtobrutinib was safe, well-tolerated, and an efficacious option in patients with prior BTKi-intolerance.

Comparative Trial Evaluating a High- Versus Low-Integration Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Contouring the Jawline.

Contour deficits of the jawline are an area of concern for many aesthetic patients. While the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) for jawline enhancement has been described previously, comparative investigations of HA fillers manufactured with different technologies are limited. Therefore, the aim of the current investigation was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Restylane Lyft (HA-L) and Restylane Defyne (HA-D) for contouring of the jawline. This prospective clinical trial enrolled forty (40) participants. Twenty (20) participants with thin skin were treated with HA-D, and twenty (20) participants with thick skin were treated with HA-L. Visits occurred at Screening/Baseline (treatment), Week 2 (touch-up), and Months 1, 3, and 6. At each visit, a blinded evaluator rated 3-dimensional participant imagery according to the Jawline Volume Loss Scale and participants completed the Jawline Subject Satisfaction Scale. Frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was collected via participant diaries, and product integration characteristics were evaluated via ultrasound. Chi-square tests of independence revealed statistically significant improvements in severities of jawline volume loss, which were maximal at Month 1 (100%) and maintained until Month 6 (82.05%). At Month 1, 92.10% of participants reported being satisfied with overall treatment effects. Adverse events were expected per the product monographs and did not vary per group. On ultrasound, HA-L displayed targeted product integration and HA-D displayed diffuse product integration. Results support the use of HA-L and HA-D for the contouring of the jawline with each product capable of providing distinct advantages depending on patient attributes (e.g., skin thickness, underlying bone structure, desired outcomes). Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Efficacy and Safety of Taletrectinib in Chinese Patients With ROS1+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase II TRUST-I Study.

Taletrectinib, a highly potent, CNS-active, ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has demonstrated high and durable response rates, high intracranial objective response rate (ORR), prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), and activity against G2032R with a favorable safety profile. We report outcomes from the pivotal TRUST-I study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04395677) of taletrectinib for ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer in China. TRUST-I evaluated TKI-naїve and crizotinib-pretreated patients. The primary end point was confirmed ORR (cORR) by independent review committee; key secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), PFS, and safety. As of November 2023, 173 patients were enrolled (median age, 55 years; 58% female; 73% never smoked; TKI naїve: n = 106; crizotinib pretreated: n = 67). In TKI-naїve patients, cORR and intracranial cORR were 91% and 88%, respectively, and 52% and 73% in crizotinib-pretreated patients. In TKI-naїve patients, median DOR and median PFS were not reached (NR) with 22.1-month and 23.5-month follow-up, respectively. In crizotinib-pretreated patients, the median DOR was 10.6 months (95% CI, 6.3 months to NR; 8.4-month follow-up), and the median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 12.0 months; 9.7-month follow-up). Eight of 12 patients (67%) with G2032R mutations responded. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were increased AST (76%), diarrhea (70%), and increased ALT (68%), most of which were grade 1-2. Incidences of neurologic TEAEs were low (dizziness: 23%; dysgeusia: 10%) and mostly grade 1. Discontinuations (5%) and dose reductions (19%) due to TEAEs were low. Taletrectinib continues to show high and durable overall responses, prolonged PFS, robust activity against intracranial lesions and acquired resistance mutations including G2032R, and a favorable safety profile with a low incidence of neurologic TEAEs.

A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study of S-588410, a five-peptide cancer vaccine as an adjuvant therapy after curative resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

S-588410, a cancer peptide vaccine (CPV), comprises five HLA-A*24:02-restricted peptides from five cancer-testis antigens. In a phase 2 study, S-588410 was well-tolerated and exhibited antitumor efficacy in patients with urothelial cancer. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, immune response, and safety of S-588410 in patients with completely resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This phase 3 study involved patients with HLA-A*24:02-positive and lymph node metastasis-positive ESCC who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by curative resection. After randomization, patients were administered S-588410 and placebo (both emulsified with Montanide™ ISA 51VG) subcutaneously. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) induction, and safety. Statistical significance was tested using the one-sided weighted log-rank test with the Fleming-Harrington class of weights. A total of 276 patients were randomized (N = 138/group). The median RFS was 84.3 and 84.1weeks in the S-588410 and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.8156), whereas the median OS was 236.3weeks and not reached, respectively (P = 0.6533). CTL induction was observed in 132/134 (98.5%) patients who received S-588410 within 12weeks. Injection site reactions (137/140 patients [97.9%]) were the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events in the S-588410 group. Prolonged survival was observed in S-588410-treated patients with upper thoracic ESCC, grade 3 injection-site reactions, or high CTL intensity. S-588410 induced immune response and had acceptable safety but failed to reach the primary endpoint. A high CTL induction rate and intensity may be critical for prolonging survival during future CPV development.

O-027 Efficacy results from the phase II randomized clinical trial: OXO-001 in infertile women undergoing egg donation IVF/ICSI

Abstract Study question Does OXO-001 increase implantation and pregnancy rates in women undergoing egg donation IVF/ICSI and embryo transfer (ET) compared to placebo? Summary answer This proof-of-concept (PoC) prospective randomized and controlled study shows that OXO-001 treatment increases implantation and pregnancy rates in infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI with studied doses. What is known already OXO-001 is a drug being developed as an innovative treatment to enhance embryo implantation through a direct effect on the endometrium. Preclinical results show an increase in embryo implantation and viability. Moreover, they show that OXO-001 is safe for the mother, the fetuses, and the newborns without any deleterious effect on the development, viability, and implantation potential of OXO-001-exposed embryos. Neither conceptus development nor morphological disturbances have been observed in the deciduas of treated-pregnant mice. Furthermore, clinical trials confirmed that OXO-001 has the necessary wide safety margin and non-complex kinetics, allowing further research on its therapeutic potential in infertility. Study design, size, duration It was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and multicenter phase II clinical trial with three parallel arms conducted at 28 European centers (September/2021-January/2023. EudraCT Num:2021-000001-25). A subset of women ≤40 years were analyzed. A total of 173 were randomized in the three study arms (Placebo, 200 and 300mg/day OXO-001). Treatment started one menstrual cycle before the ET cycle and continued until 5 weeks after ET. The results of this communication are focused on the 300mg/day dose. Participants/materials, setting, methods Patients were infertile women (18-40 years; BMI 18-30 kg/m2) eligible for a fresh-single blastocyst (day 5 and ≥3BB) ET resulting from a donor egg. Exclusion criteria include gynecological abnormalities and history of ≥ 2 failed ET, among others. The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR). Secondary included biochemical and clinical pregnancy (BPR and CPR), live birth rate (LBR), and safety and tolerability of OXO-001. Main results and the role of chance 111 women were randomized, and 96 performed a single ET (42 Placebo, 54 OXO-001 300mg/day). Higher BPR, CPR, OPR, and LBR per delivery after were observed in the OXO-001 group versus placebo (75.9% vs. 52.4%*, 50.0% vs. 37.5%, 46.3% vs. 35.7%, 42.6% vs. 35.7%, respectively. *p<0.05). The logistic regression analysis showed a statistically significant difference in the BPR for OXO-001 versus placebo (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.17-7.85; p = 0.022), and a clinically meaningful difference for CPR, OPR, and LBR after a single ET. In safety evaluation, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) assessed as at least possibly related to the study medication were similar between groups (14 for OXO-001 and 10 for placebo). Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. The most common TEAES were headache, nausea and vomiting, gastrointestinal and dizziness. The assigned study medication was well tolerated, and relevant changes in laboratory analyses (hematology and biochemical profile) were not observed. Limitations, reasons for caution This PoC study was designed to define clinically meaningful differences in fertility outcomes and find patient profiles. It was not empowered to find statistical differences in the OPR. An empowered phase III study is needed to confirm the positive results from phase II. Wider implications of the findings his phase II PoC has achieved its objectives showing that OXO-001 increases more than 10% pregnancy rates in infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI, with a safe and well-tolerated profile. This is a step forward toward the first therapeutic tool to increase embryo implantation and ET success. Trial registration number EudraCT Number: 2021-000001-25

Safety and tolerability of tirbanibulin ointment 1% treatment on 100 cm2 of the face or scalp in patients with actinic keratosis: A phase 3 study

Tirbanibulin is approved for actinic keratosis (AK) field treatment up to 25cm2. However, AK often affects larger areas; thus, AK treatments for larger fields are needed. Evaluate the safety and tolerability of tirbanibulin when applied to a field of approximately 100cm2. Phase 3, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study among adult patients having a treatment field on the face or balding scalp of approximately 100cm2 with 4-12 AKs. Patients received tirbanibulin to cover the treatment field once daily (5 consecutive days). Safety was assessed by evaluating treatment emergent adverse events and tolerability by composite score of 6 local tolerability signs (LTS). A total of 105 patients were included. The most common LTS were erythema (96.1%) and flaking/scaling (84.4%), being mostly mild-to-moderate severity, and resolved/returned to or close to baseline by Day 29. The only severe LTS were erythema (5.8%) and flaking/scaling (8.7%). Most frequent treatment emergent adverse events were application site pruritus (10.5%) and application site pain (8.6%). Mean total number of AKs decreased from 7.7 AKs at baseline to 1.8 AKs at Day 57. Mean percent of change (reduction) from baseline in lesion count was 77.8% at Day 57. No control group. No long-term follow-up. Safety and tolerability profiles in patients treated with tirbanibulin up to 100cm2 were consistent with those previously reported over smaller field. Tirbanibulin could be used on a larger field (>25cm2).

Efficacy and safety of sovleplenib (HMPL-523) in adult patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia in China (ESLIM-01): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study

Sovleplenib, a novel spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitor, showed promising safety and activity in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia in a phase 1b/2 trial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sovleplenib in patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (ESLIM-01) was done in 34 clinical centres in China. Eligible patients, aged 18-75 years, had chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and received one or more previous treatments. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral sovleplenib or placebo, 300 mg once daily, for 24 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by baseline platelet counts, previous splenectomy, and concomitant treatment for anti-immune thrombocytopenia at baseline. The primary endpoint was durable response rate (proportion of patients with a platelet count of ≥50 × 109/L on at least four of six scheduled visits between weeks 14 and 24, not affected by rescue treatment) assessed by intention-to-treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05029635, and the extension, open-label phase is ongoing. Between Sept 29, 2021, and Dec 31, 2022, 188 patients were randomly assigned to receive sovleplenib (n=126) or placebo (n=62). 124 (66%) were female, 64 (34%) were male, and all were of Asian ethnicity. Median previous lines of immune thrombocytopenia therapy were 4·0, and 134 (71%) of 188 patients had received previous thrombopoietin or thrombopoietin receptor agonist. The primary endpoint was met; durable response rate was 48% (61/126) with sovleplenib compared with zero with placebo (difference 48% [95% CI 40-57]; p<0·0001). The median time to response was 8 days with sovleplenib compared with 30 days with placebo. 125 (99%) of 126 patients in the sovleplenib group and 53 (85%) of 62 in the placebo group reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and most events were mild or moderate. Frequent TEAEs of grade 3 or higher for sovleplenib versus placebo were platelet count decreased (7% [9/126] vs 10% [6/62]), neutrophil count decreased (3% [4/126] vs 0% [0/62]), and hypertension (3% [4/126] vs 0% [0/62]). Incidences of serious TEAEs were 21% (26/126) in the sovleplenib group and 18% (11/62) in the placebo group. There were no deaths in the study. Sovleplenib showed a clinically meaningful sustained platelet response in patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia, with a tolerable safety profile and improvement in quality of life. Sovleplenib could be a potential treatment option for patients with immune thrombocytopenia who received one or more previous therapy. HUTCHMED and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality.

Encorafenib and cetuximab versus irinotecan/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab in Chinese patients with BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: The NAUTICAL CRC study.

LBA3559 Background: BRAF V600E mutations are present in 8-12% worldwide of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and linked with a poor prognosis. Encorafenib + cetuximab (E+C) was approved by the FDA and EMA for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC who received prior systemic therapy, based on data from the BEACON CRC study. Methods: This Phase II, multicenter, randomized, open-label, 2-arm study evaluated E+C vs irinotecan + cetuximab or FOLFIRI + cetuximab (control arm) in Chinese patients with BRAF V600E mutant mCRC whose disease progressed after 1 or 2 prior treatment lines in the metastatic setting. A safety lead-in initially conducted in 10 patients reported no DLTs. Eligible patients had mCRC and a BRAF V600E mutation in tumor tissue determined by a local assay before screening and centrally confirmed. Patients were randomly assigned to the doublet arm (E+C) or the control arm in a 2:1 ratio, respectively. Randomization was stratified by baseline ECOG performance status (0 vs 1) and prior use of irinotecan (yes vs no). The primary objective of the randomized phase was to compare the efficacy of E+C vs the control arm, as measured by PFS (assessed by blinded independent central review). Secondary objectives included PFS assessed by the investigator, ORR, DOR, DCR, TTR, OS, QoL, and safety and tolerability of E+C. Results of the randomized phase of the study are reported. Results: At data cut-off (19 Dec 2023), 65 patients were enrolled in the E+C arm and 32 in the control arm. Median patient age was 56 years, the primary cancer site was the left colon in 56.7% of patients, 48.5% had metastases to ≥3 organs, 56.7% had liver metastases, 77.3% received one prior metastatic treatment, and 22.7% received 2 prior metastatic treatments. Results are shown below for E+C vs the control arm, respectively. Median PFS assessed by BICR was 4.2 mo vs 2.5 mo (HR 0.37; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.68; P=0.0004). Median OS was 11.6 mo vs 8.2 mo (HR for death 0.55; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.99). Confirmed ORR was 24.6% (95% CI: 14.8, 36.9) vs 6.3% (95% CI: 0.8, 20.8). Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of grade 3 or higher occurred in 47.7% vs 51.9% of patients. Treatment-related grade 3 or higher occurred in 24.6% and 44.4% of patients. The most frequent TEAEs were anemia (30.8% vs 37%), vomiting (26.2% vs 33.3%), rash (24.6% vs 29.6%), weight loss (23.1% vs 18.5%), hypoalbuminemia (21.5% vs 22.2%), and melanocytic naevus (21.5% vs 0%). Three patient deaths were reported during treatment: unknown cause (n=1) and pneumonia (n=1) in the E+C arm and septic shock (n=1) in the control arm. Conclusions: Treatment with a combination of encorafenib and cetuximab is effective and well tolerated in Chinese patients with BRAF V600E mutant mCRC, resulting in a significantly longer PFS than standard therapies. These results are consistent with those previously reported in the BEACON study. Clinical trial information: NCT05004350 .

Efficacy and safety of taletrectinib in patients with advanced or metastatic ROS1+ non–small cell lung cancer: The phase 2 TRUST-I study.

8520 Background: Taletrectinib, a highly potent, next-generation, central nervous system–active, selective ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), was previously reported to provide high overall and intracranial (IC) response rates, prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), and activity against G2032R with favorable tolerability. We report updated data from the TRUST-I study (NCT04395677), the largest clinical trial to date conducted in patients living with ROS1+ NSCLC. Methods: TRUST-I, a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, pivotal phase 2 study of taletrectinib conducted in China, had 2 cohorts: TKI-naïve and TKI-pretreated. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by Independent Review Committee (IRC) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: As of November 2023, 173 patients were enrolled (median age: 55 y; 58% female; 73% never smoked; TKI-naïve: n = 106; TKI-pretreated: n = 67). In TKI-naïve patients, 21% had prior chemotherapy, and 17% had brain metastases; in TKI-pretreated patients, 34% had prior chemotherapy, and 42% had brain metastases. In TKI-naïve patients, the ORR was 91% (95% CI: 83, 95) and IC-ORR was 88% (7/8; 95% CI: 47, 100). In TKI-pretreated patients, the ORR was 52% (95% CI: 40, 65) and IC-ORR was 75% (12/16; 95% CI: 48, 93). In patients with G2032R mutation, 8 of 12 patients (67% [95% CI: 35, 90]) responded. DoR and PFS remain durable, with median follow-up of 23.5 months in TKI-naïve patients and 9.7 months in TKI-pretreated patients (Table). Among all patients (n = 173), the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were AST increase (76%), diarrhea (70%), and ALT increase (68%). Rates of neurologic TEAEs were low (dizziness: 23%; dysgeusia: 10%) and mostly grade 1. Discontinuation (5%) and dose reductions (19%) due to TEAEs were low. Conclusions: With longer follow-up, taletrectinib continues to show high and durable overall responses, robust intracranial and G2032R activity, and a favorable safety profile with a low incidence of neurologic AEs. An additional ongoing pivotal phase 2 study, TRUST-II (NCT04919811), is further evaluating the efficacy and safety of taletrectinib in patients in the US, Europe, and Asia. Clinical trial information: NCT04395677 . [Table: see text]

Phase Ib portion of the ACTION-1 phase Ib/3 trial of RYZ101 in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) progressing after 177Lu somatostatin analogue (SSA) therapy: Safety and efficacy findings.

3091 Background: RYZ101 (225Ac-DOTATATE) is an alpha-emitting radiopharmaceutical in development for SSTR2+ solid tumors. Alpha-particles have a shorter path length/higher linear energy transfer than beta-particles, causing more frequent double-strand DNA breaks and potentially improved therapeutic index. ACTION-1 (NCT05477576) is a 2-part, global, randomized, controlled, open-label, phase 1b/3 trial of RYZ101 in advanced, well-differentiated SSTR+ GEP-NETs progressing after 177Lu-SSA therapy. Herein, we report updated results from the phase Ib portion of the trial. Methods: The phase Ib portion of the trial had a dose de-escalation/Bayesian optimal interval design with boundaries based on a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of 25%. Patients received RYZ101 IV every 8 weeks for 4 cycles. Planned dose levels (n=6/level): Level 0 (starting dose) 120 kBq/kg; Level –1 90 kBq/kg; Level –2 60 kBq/kg. DLT was assessed for 56 days after the first RYZ101 dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v5.0. Dose de-escalation decisions/safety data were overseen by a Data Review Committee. Tumor response was assessed locally by RECIST v1.1. Results: 17 patients have received at least one dose of RYZ101 at 120 kBq/kg (4 doses: 15 patients; 2 doses: 2 patients; median 8.3 MBq). Baseline characteristics: median age 63 years; male (n=11); ECOG PS 0/1 (n=10/7); primary tumor site GI/pancreas (n=12/5). As of 30 June 2023, the most frequent TEAEs were nausea (58.8%) and fatigue (52.9%). Serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed in 6 patients (none were treatment related); grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 9 patients (5 were treatment related). No AEs led to treatment discontinuation. 4 patients had TEAEs leading to dose modification, dose hold, and/or delays. The confirmed objective response rate was 29.4% (n=5; all partial responses); 1 patient had an unconfirmed partial response. 8 patients (47.1%) had stable disease and 3 patients (17.6%) had progressive disease. Updated safety and efficacy data, including duration of response and progression-free survival, will be presented. Conclusions: RYZ101 was well tolerated and a fixed dose of 10.2 MBq was declared the recommended phase 3 dose. Initial data suggest promising efficacy. Longer-term safety and efficacy data will be presented. Part 2 (phase 3) is enrolling and will compare RYZ101 at 10.2 MBq every 8 weeks for 4 cycles with standard of care in patients with advanced SSTR2+ GEP-NETs progressing following prior 177Lu-labeled SSAs. Clinical trial information: NCT05477576 .

A phase 1 study of REGN6569, a GITR mAb, in combination with cemiplimab in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumor malignancies: Initial dose-escalation results.

2650 Background: REGN6569 is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) that is highly specific for glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor–related protein (GITR). GITR is expressed on several immune cell subtypes, notably regulatory T cells (Tregs), and activated natural killer (NK) cells. REGN6569 demonstrated greater in vitro antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity against GITR-expressing Tregs, as compared to GITR-expressing CD8+ T cells. Mouse studies showed that REGN6569 + cemiplimab (anti-PD-1) combination treatment achieved longer-term tumor responses compared with either drug alone. Methods: This is a first-in-human study (NCT04465487) evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of REGN6569 administered intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks (Q3W) + cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W, in pts with advanced solid tumors for which immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies have not been approved or are not available. The study includes a dose-escalation part with 5 dose levels (DL1-DL5) for REGN6569 (“4+3” design), with an initial dose of REGN6569 monotherapy given as a safety lead-in followed by REGN6569 + cemiplimab in subsequent doses. Results: As of the data cutoff date Oct 20, 2023, the dose-escalation part has been completed. 29 pts (median age 58.0 years, 62.1% male) were treated with REGN6569 + cemiplimab, up to the 1200 mg dose level (DL5), across many solid tumor types. The most common tumor type was colorectal cancer (34.5%). One pt (40 mg DL2) experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (Grade 3 hepatic failure); maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Twelve pts (41.4%) had a Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and 16 pts (55.2%) had a treatment-related TEAE (any grade). The most frequent TEAEs (any grade) were arthralgia (24.1%), infusion-related reactions, and abdominal pain (20.7% each). There were no treatment-related deaths; 19 (65.5%) pts had disease progression leading to death. Two pts achieved ongoing partial responses by investigator assessment with REGN6569 + cemiplimab treatment: 1 pt with mucoepidermoid tumor of the parotid gland treated with 120 mg (DL3) REGN6569 and 1 pt with B3 thymoma treated with 400 mg (DL4) REGN6569, with duration of responses, 5.6 and 10.4 months, respectively. Full receptor occupancy on circulating Tregs was observed in all dose cohorts following REGN6569 treatment. Increased frequency (~10–50%) of proliferating NK cells in peripheral blood was observed post REGN6569 treatment across all dose cohorts. Conclusions: In this dose-escalation study, REGN6569 was administered up to 1200 mg (DL5) in combination with cemiplimab with one dose-limiting toxicity. The study has progressed to dose-expansion cohorts in anti–PD-1-resistant head and neck cancer, with pts treated with REGN6569 (DL5) + cemiplimab. Clinical trial information: NCT04465487 .

ReNeu: A pivotal phase 2b trial of mirdametinib in children and adults with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated symptomatic inoperable plexiform neurofibroma (PN).

3016 Background: PN in patients (pts) with NF1 can cause pain, disfigurement, impaired quality of life (QoL), and can undergo malignant transformation. ReNeu (NCT03962543), a multicenter, open-label, Phase 2b study, evaluated efficacy and safety of the highly selective, oral, investigational MEK1/2 inhibitor mirdametinib in adult (≥18 y) and pediatric (2-17 y) pts with inoperable NF1 PN causing significant morbidities. Methods: Mirdametinib was administered as a capsule or dispersible tablet (2 mg/m2 BID, max 4 mg BID) without regard to food in 3 wk on/1 wk off 28-d cycles. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR; percentage of pts with MRI-assessed ≥20% reduction of target PN volume by blinded independent central review [BICR] within the 24-cycle treatment phase). The minimum clinically relevant ORR (null) was defined as 23% for adults and 20% for pediatrics. Ptscould continue treatment in an optional long-term follow-up (LTFU) phase. Additional key endpoints were duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR), change from baseline (BL) in target PN volume, pain severity (Numerical Rating Scale-11 [NRS-11]), pain interference (Pain Interference Index [PII]), health-related (HR) QoL (PedsQL), and safety. Results: All114 pts (58 adult, 56 pediatric) received mirdametinib. As of the 20 Sept 2023 data cutoff (DCO), BICR-confirmed ORR during the treatment phase was 41% (95% CI, 29-55; P&lt;.001 vs null) in adults and 52% (95% CI, 38-65; P&lt;.001 vs null) in pediatric pts. Two adult pts and 1 pediatric pt also had a confirmed response in the ongoing LTFU. Median (min, max) target PN volumetric best response from BL was -41% (-90, 13) and -42% (-91, 48) in adult and pediatric pts, respectively. As of the DCO, median treatment duration was 22 mo for each cohort and median DoR was not reached. Median (range) TTR was 7.8 (4-19) mo in adult pts and 7.9 (4-19) mo in pediatric pts. Adult and pediatric pts had statistically significant improvements from BL to cycle 13 in NRS-11, PII, and key PedsQL measures. Most frequent (≥35% pts) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting in adults and diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, and vomiting in pediatric pts. 16% and 25% of adult and pediatric pts, respectively, had grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, and 22% and 9%, respectively, discontinued due to TEAEs. Conclusions: In ReNeu, the largest multicenter NF1 PN trial reported to date, mirdametinib demonstrated a statistically significant ORR by BICR, with deep and durable PN volume reductions, significant improvements in pain severity, pain interference, and HRQoL, and a manageable safety profile in both adults and children. Together with a dispersible tablet formulation, these results underscore mirdametinib’s potential to become an important new treatment option for NF1 PN pts across all ages. Clinical trial information: NCT03962543 .

Tirzepatide for Weight Reduction in Chinese Adults With Obesity

Obesity has become a global public health concern and China has the largest number of affected people worldwide. To assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with tirzepatide for weight reduction in Chinese adults with obesity or overweight and weight-related comorbidities. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial conducted at 29 centers in China from September 2021 to December 2022 included Chinese adults (aged ≥18 years) with a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 28 or greater than or equal to 24 and at least 1 weight-related comorbidity, excluding diabetes. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive once-weekly, subcutaneous 10-mg (n = 70) or 15-mg (n = 71) tirzepatide or placebo (n = 69), plus a lifestyle intervention, for 52 weeks. Co-primary end points were the percent change in body weight from baseline and weight reduction of at least 5% at week 52. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat population. Of 210 randomized participants (103 [49.0%] female; mean [SD] age, 36.1 [9.1] years; body weight, 91.8 [16.0] kg; BMI, 32.3 [3.8]), 201 (95.7%) completed the trial. The mean change in body weight at week 52 was -13.6% (95% CI, -15.8% to -11.4%) with tirzepatide 10 mg, -17.5% (95% CI, -19.7% to -15.3%) with tirzepatide 15 mg, and -2.3% with placebo (difference between 10 mg and placebo, -11.3% [95% CI, -14.3% to -8.3%; P < .001]; difference between 15 mg and placebo, -15.1% [95% CI, -18.2% to -12.1%; P < .001]). The percentage of participants achieving body weight reductions of 5% or greater was 87.7% with tirzepatide 10 mg, 85.8% with tirzepatide 15 mg, and 29.3% with placebo (P < .001 for comparisons with placebo). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events with tirzepatide were gastrointestinal. Most were mild to moderate in severity, with few events leading to treatment discontinuation (<5%). In Chinese adults with obesity or overweight, once-weekly treatment with tirzepatide 10 mg or 15 mg resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful weight reduction with an acceptable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05024032.

Long-term safety of fezolinetant in Chinese women with vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause: the phase 3 open-label MOONLIGHT 3 clinical trial.

We aimed to assess long-term safety and tolerability of fezolinetant, a nonhormonal neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist, among Chinese women with vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause participating in the MOONLIGHT 3 trial. In this phase 3 open-label study, women in menopause aged 40-65 years received fezolinetant 30 mg once daily for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), assessed at every visit through week 52 and one follow-up visit at week 55. Overall, 150 women were enrolled (mean age, 54 years) and 105 completed treatment. The frequency of TEAEs was 88.7%. Most TEAEs were mild (63.3%) or moderate (22.7%). The most common TEAE was upper respiratory tract infection (16.0%), followed by dizziness, headache, and protein urine present (10.7% each). There was no clinically relevant change (mean ± standard deviation) in endometrial thickness (baseline, 2.95 ± 1.11 mm; week 52, 2.94 ± 1.18 mm). Alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase levels >3 times the upper limit of normal were reported in 1.4% of women; no Hy's Law cases occurred. Fezolinetant 30 mg once daily was generally safe and well tolerated over a 52-week period among women in China with vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04451226.

Efficacy and safety of mirikizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for Japanese patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: a subgroup analysis of the global phase 3 LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2 studies.

Mirikizumab is a p19-directed anti-interleukin-23 antibody with potential efficacy against ulcerative colitis (UC). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of mirikizumab in a Japanese subpopulation with moderately to severely active UC from the LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2 studies. LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2 were phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of mirikizumab therapy in adults with moderately to severely active UC. LUCENT-1 was a 12-week induction trial where patients were randomized 3:1 to receive intravenous mirikizumab 300 mg or placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W). Patients achieving a clinical response with mirikizumab following the induction study were re-randomized 2:1 to double-blind treatment with either mirikizumab 200 mg or placebo subcutaneously Q4W during the 40-week maintenance study. The primary outcomes were clinical remission at week 12 of LUCENT-1 and week 40 of LUCENT-2. A total of 137 patients enrolled in Japan were randomized to mirikizumab (n = 102) or placebo (n = 35). Compared with placebo, patients who received mirikizumab showed numerically higher clinical remission at week 12 of induction (32.4% [n = 33] vs. 2.9% [n = 1]) and at week 40 of maintenance (48.9% [n = 23] vs. 28.0% [n = 7]). A greater number of patients achieved key secondary endpoints in the mirikizumab group compared with placebo. The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar across mirikizumab and placebo groups. Efficacy and safety results observed in the Japanese subpopulation were generally consistent with those in the overall population. Mirikizumab induction and maintenance treatments were effective in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active UC. No new safety concerns were identified.

P127 Comparison of the Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of a Proposed Biosimilar MSB11456 with Tocilizumab Reference Product in Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of a Randomized Double-Blind Study

Abstract Background/Aims Tocilizumab is an anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody indicated for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory diseases. MSB11456 is a proposed biosimilar to US-licensed tocilizumab and EU-approved tocilizumab. It has already shown equivalent pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity profiles to these products given subcutaneously (SC) as a single dose in healthy volunteers. This Phase III, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, multiple fixed-dose, parallel group study compared efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of MSB11456 and EU-approved tocilizumab administered SC in moderate-to-severe RA patients. Methods Patients were randomised to 162mg MSB11456 or EU-approved tocilizumab for 24 weeks (W). At W24, patients receiving EU-approved tocilizumab were re-randomised to continue treatment or switch to MSB11456 for up to W52. Safety evaluations were conducted up to W63. A change from baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 Joint Count-ESR (DAS28-ESR) at W24 was analysed, as the primary efficacy endpoint, using analysis of covariance to determine the least squares mean (LSM) difference between MSB11456 and EU-approved tocilizumab; equivalence was considered if the 90% confidence interval (CI) was entirely within the FDA equivalence interval -0.6 to 0.5. Secondary endpoints were 20% improvement in ACR core set measures at W24 and DAS28-ESR at W12. Additional endpoints included ACR50/70, change in DAS28-CRP, Simplified and Clinical Disease Activity Indexes, evaluation of immunogenicity up to W55 and safety up to W63. Results Clinically relevant LSM decreases from baseline in DAS28-ESR were observed from W2 up to W24 with both treatments. The 90% CI for LSM difference in the change from baseline in DAS28-ESR between treatments was fully included within the predefined equivalence interval, which demonstrated therapeutic equivalence of MSB11456 and EU-approved tocilizumab (Table 1). Other efficacy endpoint analyses supported this conclusion. No discernible patterns in the nature or frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were identified to suggest a difference between drugs. Anti-drug antibodies incidence was similar among treatment arms. Switching from EU-approved tocilizumab to MSB11456 had no clinically relevant impact on efficacy or safety. Conclusion Equivalent efficacy, immunogenicity and safety profiles of MSB11456 and EU-approved tocilizumab were demonstrated in moderate-to-severe RA patients, confirming equivalence between MSB11456 and the EU-approved tocilizumab. Disclosure A. Zubrzycka-Sienkiewicz: None. M. Misterska-Skora: None. M. Socik-Pojawa: None. K. Klama: None. M. Ullman: Other; Employee of Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim - Sponsor of the study. C. Petit-Frere: Other; Employee of Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim - Sponsor of the study. A. Illes: Other; Employee of Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim - Sponsor of the study. P. Baker: Other; Employee of Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim - Sponsor of the study. J. Monnet: Other; Employee of Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim - Sponsor of the study. J. Morais: Other; Employee of Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim - Sponsor of the study. J. Brzezicki: None.

Abstract 3737: Molecular and early clinical characterization of the anti-CD73 antibody S095024 (Sym024)

Abstract Background: Adenosine signaling is a central immunosuppressive mechanism affecting a broad set of immune cell types. Adenosine is generated from extracellular ATP by a group of ectonucleotidases including CD39 and CD73. Suppressing the adenosine pathway via CD73 blockade may enhance the potential of checkpoint inhibitor therapies.S095024 (Sym024) is a fully human, effector-function attenuated antibody that binds to human and cynomolgus CD73 with sub-nM affinity. Methods: Preclinically, the stoichiometry and conformational structure of the binding interaction between CD73 and S095024 was assessed by SEC-MALS and cryo-EM and the ability of S095024 to inhibit CD73 activity was done in vitro covering 3-, 6- and 24-hour incubation periods. The clinical safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of S095024 alone or in combination with Sym021, an anti-PD1 antibody, was investigated in a first-in-human study (NCT04672434) in patients with selected types of advanced solid tumors. Following assessment of single agent S095024 (100 to 1500 mg IV Q2W) in part I, the safety and tolerability of S095024 (300 to 1500 mg IV Q2W) was assessed in combination with Sym021 (200 mg IV Q2W) in part II. A part IIa was added: patients received 3000 mg IV Q2W of S095024 in Cycle 1, followed by 3000 mg S095024 + 200 mg Sym021 from Cycle 2 onwards. Results: Structural data indicate that S095024 binds to CD73 in a unique configuration by bridging the two monomers of the molecule, interacting in a 1:1 stoichiometry and effectively preventing the conformational state cycling required for catalysis. Functional data using a 20x cell line panel harboring a broad range of CD73 expression levels demonstrates that this interaction modus results in deep enzymatic inhibition. As of 12 Oct 2023, 43 patients have been treated with, S095024 in the FIH study. S095024, as a single agent (N=18) and in combination with PD-1 blockade (N=25) was well tolerated across all dose levels. The most frequent treatment emergent adverse events (≥15% patients) were fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, dyspnea, and vomiting. A dose proportional increase in drug exposure, both in monotherapy and combination, was observed starting at 900 mg. Target engagement assessed both peripherally (free soluble CD73) and intra-tumorally (enzymatic activity), showed a sustained decrease in free soluble CD73 in blood at dose levels ≥1500 mg and dose-dependent CD73 modulation, with &amp;gt;80% inhibition reached at ≥1500 mg in tumor biopsies. Conclusions: These findings reveal the potential of S095024 (Sym024) to prevent adenosine-mediated tumor evasion and support further clinical investigation. Citation Format: Anna Spreafico, Jordi R. Ahnert, David Sommerhalder, Maria Almena-Carrasco, Najah Harouki Crochemore, Xenophon Ianopulos, Janus S. Jakobsen, Emily Armbruster, Audrey Delmas, Amédée des Georges, Camilla Fröhlich, Julia Geronimi, Michael M. Grandal, Randi W. Hansen, Johan Lantto, Julie Legrand, Franck Levasseur, Matteo Riva, Christelle Rodrigues, Vanessa Seif, Vasileios Askoxylakis, Nehal Lakhani. Molecular and early clinical characterization of the anti-CD73 antibody S095024 (Sym024) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3737.

A Phase I Study of the Oral Dual-Acting Pan-PI3K/mTOR Inhibitor Bimiralisib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

Bimiralisib is a pan-PI3K/mTOR inhibitor demonstrating antitumor efficacy in preclinical models. The objectives of this study were to identify a maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), a dosing schedule, and adverse events (AEs) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received oral bimiralisib to determine the MTD of one continuous (once daily) and two intermittent schedules (A: Days 1, 2 weekly; B: Days 1, 4 weekly) until progression or unacceptable AEs occurred. The MTD for the continuous schedule was 80 mg, with grade three fatigue as the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). No MTD was reached with intermittent schedules, with only one DLT in schedule B. PK analysis suggested that 140 mg (schedule A) was within the biologically active dose range and was selected for further exploration. The most frequent treatment-emergent AEs were hyperglycemia (76.2%) in the continuous schedule, and nausea (56-62.5%) in schedules A and B. The most frequent treatment-emergent > grade three AE for all schedules combined was hyperglycemia (28.6%, continuous schedule; 12.0%, schedule A; 12.5%, schedule B). There was one partial response in a head and neck squamous cancer patient with a NOTCH1T1997M mutation. Bimiralisib demonstrated a manageable AE profile consistent with this compound class. Intermittent schedules had fewer > grade three AEs, while also maintaining favorable PK profiles. Intermittent schedule A is proposed for further development in biomarker-selected patient populations.