Biosolid use imports microplastics into the rhizosphere where they may interfere with root-soil-microbial interactions and cause morphological adaptations in crop root systems. Few studies have examined the response of crop roots to microplastics at documented soil concentrations, and many studies collect root traits using destructive techniques. Hence, there is little information on when and how microplastics effect the physical structure of root systems. Using the rhizobox method, soybeans (Glycine max) were grown in soil amended with biosolid microplastic mimics (polyethylene film or polypropylene fragments at 2,000 and 15,000 particles/kg dry soil) or biosolids and imaged weekly until maturity (11 weeks) using a custom scanner system. Plant biomass increased in the polyethylene treatments and decreased in the high concentration polypropylene treatment. Relative to the Control, polyethylene treatments had larger root length, reduced root diameters, reached maturity faster, had deeper root systems, and had a greater number of lateral roots. In contrast, polypropylene treatments had a mixed response, with high concentrations eliciting a lower root length, fewer laterals, and a more vertical root orientation. Segmented linear regression revealed that root growth in the Control and Biosolid treatments continued through the course of the experiment, while the microplastic treatments reached maturity up to two weeks earlier. Imagery revealed that microplastics elicited deeper rooting depth within the first week and differences in all root traits were evident by the development of the first trifoliate leaflets. Microplastic effects on root traits at early life stages suggest soil physiological drivers, while increased branching frequency and lower lateral elongation are suggestive of changes in soil nitrogen availability. The minimal difference in root traits in the biosolid treatment may be attributable to differences in microplastic properties or counteractive effects by other biosolid constituents.