French Pharmacovigilance Database Research Articles

Cross-reactivity among and between macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins: Study on the French pharmacovigilance database.

Hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) are reported for the macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins (MLS) antibiotic family. Data about cross-reactivity among and between MLS remain scarce or controversial. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of hypersensitivity cross-reactions among MLSs based on data extracted from the French National Pharmacovigilance Database (FPVD). Cases of HSR to MLSs reported between January 1985 and December 2019 were extracted from the FPVD using standardized MedDRA queries (SMQ). Cases including an allergological test involving multiple MLSs and giving at least one positive result were included. Of the 8394 cases reviewed, 149 were included. HSR mainly involved pristinamycin (n= 83; 53.2%) and spiramycin (n= 31; 19.9%). HSR to MLS was immediate in 54 cases and delayed in 94 cases. Skin tests represented the majority of the allergological tests performed (n= 728; 84.7%), followed by reintroduction tests (n= 79; 9.2%). Eighty-six cross-reactivities among MLS were identified in 62 cases (41.6%). All the 25 explorations performed for streptogramins showed cross-reactivities, but only 30/253 among macrolides (11.9%). Cross-reactivities between the three MLS were observed in 31/322 (9.6%) of the allergological explorations. This study highlights the possibility of cross-reactivity among and between MLSs. Dermatologists and allergologists managing patients with HSR to MLSs should be aware of a risk of cross-reactivity among the macrolides and between the different classes of MLS and to perform MLSs allergological testing before recommending an alternative antibiotic, especially in severe drug hypersensitivity from the MLS family.

Sodium hypochlorite accident diagnosis and management: Analysis from the literature and the French pharmacovigilance database.

Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is considered as the reference irrigation solution in endodontics. However, NaOCl-related accidents may occur, and non-dentist health professionals might under-recognize this rare adverse effect although it is potentially severe, with possible medical and aesthetic sequelae. We performed a literature review to provide to non-dentist healthcare professionals a large picture of symptoms, management and potential consequences of NaOCl accidents. We queried PubMed and the French Pharmacovigilance database and retrieved 76 cases for analysis (70 from 57 published articles, and six from the database). The analysis showed that patients were mostly women (79%), aged around of 42 years, undergoing upper jawbone (74%) endodontic procedure. NaOCl concentration ranged from 1% to 10%, with 0.5 to 30 mL injected. Most cases (86%) corresponded to an accidental extrusion beyond the root apex to the periapical tissues, followed by tissular injection by error (8%) and extrusion into the maxillary sinus (3%). Local symptoms always occurred within 24 h, mostly pain (99%), edema (89%) and/or ecchymosis (61%). Complications were mainly neurological (29%), necrotic (22%) and cutaneous (9%). Most of patients (76%) fully recovered after medical management but 18 (24%) required surgical management. Any healthcare professional should be aware of the classical symptomatic triad of NaOCl accident with sudden pain, haemorrhage/ecchymosis and swelling, to start or recommend adequate management. Patients should be reassured, but a close follow-up is necessary to avoid delayed complication.

Regulatory Authority in Pharmacovigilance

Abstract: Based on their Gross National Income (GNI) per capita, the World Bank has categorized 80 economies as HighIncome. Global pharmacovigilance rules are primarily driven by three major regulatory stakeholders: the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). This article's goal is to provide an overview of pharmacovigilance systems and procedures in high-income nations, especially those that are also International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) members. Every high-income nation is a part of the WHO PIDM. Medication safety precautions are directly correlated with a nation's income level. The 10 intrepid members of the Uppsala Monitoring Center are from affluent nations and were among the first to act following the thalidomide catastrophe, establishing drug appraisal committees, launching ADR reporting forms, and implementing safety protocols. Although VigiBase is accessible, several nations have their own databases for data management and analysis, such as the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, the French pharmacovigilance database, the EU's Eudravigilance system, and Canada's Vigilance online database. Strong pharmacovigilance systems are present in all high-income nations. The two international leaders in pharmacovigilance are the USFDA and EMA. The majority of wealthy nations adhere to EMA regulations. The degree of affluence in a nation directly affects the safety of medicines.

Drug-Induced Uveitis Related to Checkpoint Inhibitors and MAP-kinase Inhibitors

We classified drug-induced uveitis related to Immune Checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and MAP-kinase pathway inhibitors (MAPKi), including BRAF-inhibitors (BRAFi) and MEK-inhibitors (MEKi), according ophthalmological examination. Cases were retrieved from the French pharmacovigilance database (FPVD) which included all adverse drug reactions (ADR) registred by the French Regional Pharmacovigilance Network. We collected 113 cases of drug-induced uveitis (46 ICI-related and 67 MAPKi-related). The classification analysis identified four clusters. ICI were associated with anterior, posterior and panuveitis with severe manifestations such as retinal vasculitis and optic neuropathy. BRAFi were associated with anterior and panuveitis. MEKi inhibitors were associated with early serous-retinal detachment.

Drug-induced Sweet's syndrome: A case/non-case study in the French pharmacovigilance database.

Sweet's syndrome is an acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis first described in 1964 by Robert Douglas Sweet. The pathophysiological mechanism is not fully established; however, several cases of Sweet's syndrome have been reported following drug administration. To investigate the existence of pharmacovigilance signals between drugs and the occurrence of Sweet's syndrome, we performed a case/non-case study on reports of 'acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis' registered in the French pharmacovigilance database. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) with its 95% confidence interval were calculated. Amongthe 994 789 reports recorded in the database, 136 were Sweet's syndrome, of which 50.7% were men and the median age was 59 years (range 15-91). A total of 224 drugs were mentioned as suspects: 21.0% were antibacterials, 19.2% were antineoplastics and 12.1% were immunosuppressants. Median time to onset from drug initiation to the development of Sweet's syndrome was 15 days (range 1-1095). The highest RORs were observed with bortezomib (74.04 [40.8-134.2]), azacitidine (72.14 [29.4-176.9]), perfilgrastim (67.05 [21.2-211.6]), azathioprine (55.46 [34.8-88.4]) and bendamustine (35.84 [11.4-112.8]). Pharmacovigilance signals have been observed between the occurrence of Sweet's syndrome and colony-stimulating factors, immunosuppressants, antineoplastics and antibiotics. Clinicians should be aware of the potential associations with these drugs and should be encouraged to report any case of drug-induced Sweet's syndrome.

Local anesthetics systemic toxicity in children: analysis of the French pharmacovigilance database

PurposeTo characterize clinical profile of pediatric local anesthetic (LA) systemic toxicity (LAST) and to identify determinants of life-threatening outcomes.MethodsSpontaneous reports notified to the French Pharmacovigilance Network were retrieved and followed by a case-by-case review, according to the following criteria: LA as suspected drug, age < 18 years, adverse drug reactions related to nervous system, cardiac, respiratory, psychiatric or general disorders. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors leading to life-threatening reaction (i.e. continuous seizures or cardiorespiratory arrest).ResultsAmong 512 cases retrieved, 64 LAST cases were included (neonates 11%, infants 30%, children 36%, adolescents 23%) mainly involving lidocaine (47%), lidocaine + prilocaine (22%) and ropivacaine (14%). Toxicity profiles were neurological (58%), cardiac (11%) or mixed (20%) and 7 patients (11%) developed methemoglobinemia. LAST was life-threatening for 23 patients (36%) and 2 patients died. Doses were above recommendations in 26 patients (41%) and were not different between life-threatening and non-life-threatening cases. The context of use (general and orthopedic surgery, p = 0.006) and the type of LA agent (lidocaine, p = 0.016) were independently associated with a life-threatening outcome.ConclusionIn this national retrospective analysis, LAST in children appear to be a rare event. Neurological and cardiac signs were the most frequently reported reactions. LAST in children can be life-threatening, even at therapeutic doses. Although a fatal outcome may anecdotally occur, the vast majority of patients recovered after appropriate medical care.

Zoledronate and osteonecrosis of the jaw in osteoporosis: incidence and risk factors. Analysis of the French Pharmacovigilance Database

IntroductionBisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) have been characterized with the use of oral bisphosphonates in osteoporosis and zoledronate in oncology. Uncertainties remain, though, with the occurrence of BRONJ related to the use of zoledronate in osteoporosis. ObjectivesWe aimed to estimate the incidence and characterize the risk factors of zoledronate-associated BRONJ in osteoporosis as compared with oral bisphosphonates in real life setting. MethodsCases of BRONJ associated with zoledronate, alendronate or risedronate were extracted from the French pharmacovigilance database up to 2020. The incidence of BRONJ was estimated as their respective numbers related to cases of BRONJ in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis, over the same period, according to the Medic’AM database. ResultsBetween 2011 and 2020, BRONJ incidence with zoledronate was 9.6/100,000 patient-year (PY), significantly higher than with alendronate (5.1/100,000 PY, P<0.001), and risedronate (2.0/100,000 PY, P<0.001). The number of patients treated with bisphosphonates has steadily decreased by 44.5% over 10 years. Meanwhile, the incidence of BRONJ decreased (5.8/100,000 PY in 2011; 1.5/100,000 in 2020), although a rebound was observed in 2018, including 47.6% of BRONJ following denosumab. Apart from classical risk factors, recent dental cares stood out in more than 40% of BRONJ, and zoledronate had a shorter exposure time than oral bisphosphonates. ConclusionsIn a real-life setting, our data confirm that zoledronate-associated BRONJ in osteoporosis is scarce, seeming slightly more common compared with oral bisphosphonates. We also raise awareness of dental care guidelines and greater vigilance when using bisphosphonates in patients with previous exposure to denosumab.

Feasibility of treatment with another CDK4/6 inhibitor after severe ribociclib liver toxicity.

e13067 Background: Ribociclib is, for now, the only CDK4/6 inhibitor having demonstrated a statistically significant increase of overall survival in first-line in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. One of the limiting toxicities of ribociclib is the occurrence of grade III/IV hepatobiliary toxicity in approximately 5% of patients. It contraindicates the reintroduction of the drug. Therapeutic options after this type of adverse event are challenging because there are very limited data regarding cross reactivity in risk for hepatic injury between ribociclib, palbociclib or abemaciclib. Methods: We describe a cohort of 28 patients who presented with grade III and/or IV ribociclib-induced hepatitis and who subsequently received another CDK4/6 inhibitor. Cases were collected from the French pharmacovigilance database and additional cases were obtained through institutional databases. Data were retrospectively obtained from patients’ reports. Results: Twenty-eight patients, from 11 centers, presented a grade III (71%, 20 patients) or a grade IV (29%, 8 patients) transaminase elevation with ribociclib. Median transaminase elevation was 12.3 x ULN (upper limit normal) for AST and 15.2 x ULN for ALT. This toxicity occurred within the first 6 months of treatment for all patients except one. Ribociclib was associated with letrozole in 21 patients, fulvestrant in 5 patients and anastrozole or exemestane in 2 patients. No acute liver failure occurred. All patients switched to another CDK4/6 inhibitor (23 patients - 82% - palbociclib and 5 - 18% - abemaciclib) without significant reoccurrence of liver toxicities. Four patients (14%) presented a transient grade 1 or 2 hepatic toxicity (all of them with palbociclib), 20 patients (71%) received the second CDK4/6 inhibitor at full dose. The median follow-up was 16 months. Conclusions: Treatment with palbociclib or abemaciclib after grade III or IV transaminase elevation due to ribociclib is feasible and none of the patients in this cohort exhibited reoccurrence of significant liver toxicity afterwards. Ribociclib liver toxicity occurs mainly during the first 6 months of treatment and takes several months to recover. [Table: see text]

Augmentation des surdoses et décès en lien avec la consommation de méthadone durant la crise sanitaire liée au COVID-19 en 2020

Due to the risk of overdoses increase especially with methadone, a reinforced monitoring has been set up by the French Addictovigilance Network following the first lockdown related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this context, we managed a specific study to analyze overdoses related to methadone in 2020 compared to 2019. We analyzed methadone-related overdoses which occurred in 2019 and 2020 from two sources: DRAMES program (deaths with toxicological analysis) and the French pharmacovigilance database (BNPV) (overdoses that did not lead to death). Data from DRAMES program in 2020 show methadone as the first drug involved in deaths as well as an increase in deaths: in number (n=230 versus n=178), in proportion (41% versus 35%) and number of deaths per 1000 exposed subjects (3.4 versus 2.8). According to BNPV, the number of overdose increased in 2020 compared to 2019 (98 versus 79; i.e., 1.2-fold increase) particularly during several target periods: first lockdown, end of lockdown/summer period and second lockdown. In 2020, a higher number of cases were observed in April (n=15) and May (n=15). Overdoses and deaths occurred in subjects enrolled in treatment programs or not (naïve subjects/occasional users who obtained methadone from street market or family/friends). Overdoses resulted from different factors: overconsumption, multiple drug use with depressants drugs or cocaine, injection, consumption for sedative, recreational purposes or voluntary drug poisoning. All these data show an increase of morbidity and mortality related to methadone during COVID-19 epidemic. This trend has been observed in other countries.

Investigating the link between drug consumption and adverse events reporting in France.

The objective of this study is to examine the potential association between drug use and adverse event reporting in France. A number of drug users and cases reported were extracted from the French Health Care Insurance database (Open Medic) and the French pharmacovigilance database. We performed two separate mixed-effect models (with a drug used or reporting rate as dependent variables) with a random intercept for drug classes. We selected 62 drugs from 10 drug classes, for which 177 364 cases were reported in the French pharmacovigilance database in 2020. The results showed a strong association between drug users and the number of reported cases in France among each drug class (P < 0.01). Within a drug class, the number of reported cases is, therefore, a proxy for the exposure to a given drug in the population. This finding could be useful to approximate and compare drug exposure from pharmacovigilance databases.

Reality of drug-induced erythema multiforme: A French pharmacovigilance study

Since the 2002 SCAR study, erythema multiforme (EM), a post-infectious disease, has been distinguished from Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), drug-induced. Nevertheless, EM cases are still reported in the French pharmacovigilance database (FPDB). To describe EM reported in the FPDB and to compare the quality and the characteristics of the reports. This retrospective observational study selected all EM cases reported in the FPDB over two periods: period 1 (P1, 2008-2009) and period 2 (P2, 2018-2019). Inclusion criteria were 1) a diagnosis of clinically typical EM and/or validated by a dermatologist; 2) a reported date of onset of the reaction; and 3) a precise chronology of drug exposure. Cases were classified confirmed EM (typical acral target lesions and/or validation by a dermatologist) and possible EM (not-otherwise-specified target lesions, isolated mucosal involvement, doubtful with SJS). We concluded possible drug-induced EM when EM was confirmed, with onset ranging from 5 to 28 days without an alternative cause. Among 182 selected reports, 140 (77%) were analyzed. Of these, 67 (48%) presented a more likely alternative diagnosis than EM. Of the 73 reports of EM cases finally included (P1, n=41; P2, n=32), 36 (49%) had a probable non-drug cause and 28 (38%) were associated with only drugs with an onset time ≤4 days and/or ≥29 days. Possible drug-induced EM was retained in 9 cases (6% of evaluable reports). Etiological work-up was more often performed in period 2 than 1 (53.1% vs 29.3%, P=0.04), and the time to onset from 5 to 28 days was more frequent in period 2 (59.2% vs 40%, P=0.04). This study suggests that possible drug-induced EM is rare. Many reports describe "polymorphic" rashes inappropriately concluded as EM or post-infectious EM with unsuitable drug accountability subject to protopathic bias.

Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis Associated with Immunological Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Pharmacovigilance Study.

Acquired hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare but potentially fatal condition characterized by hyperactivation of macrophages and cytotoxic lymphocytes, combining a series of non-specific clinical symptoms and laboratory disorders. Etiologies are multiple: infectious (mainly viral) but also oncologic, autoimmune or drug-induced. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are recent anti-tumor agents associated with a novel profile of adverse events triggered by immune system over-activation. Here, we sought to provide a comprehensive description and analysis of HLH cases reported with ICI since 2014. Disproportionality analyses were performed in order to further explore the association between ICI therapy and HLH. We selected 190 cases, 177 from the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database and 13 from the literature. Detailed clinical characteristics were retrieved from the literature and from the French pharmacovigilance database. The cases of HLH reported with ICI concerned men in 65% of cases with a median age of 64 years. HLH occurred in an average of 102 days after the initiation of ICI treatment and mostly concerned nivolumab, pembrolizumab and nivolumab/ipilimumab combination. All cases were considered serious. Most cases presented a favorable outcome (58.4%); however, death was reported for 15.3% of patients. Disproportionality analyses showed that HLH was seven times more frequently reported with ICI therapy than with other drugs and three times more than with other antineoplastic agents. Clinicians should be aware of the potential risk of ICI-related HLH to improve the early diagnosis of this rare immune-related adverse event.

COVID-19 Vaccination and the Incidence of De Novo or Recurrent Rheumatoid Arthritis: A French and International (VigiBase) Signal Detection Study.

COVID-19 vaccination is critical in frequently immunocompromised patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there is a question about the risk of RA flares following vaccination. Our study intended to find out about cases of new RA or flare-ups in people who already had RA that were reported in French and international pharmacovigilance databases after COVID-19 vaccination. We performed a "case-noncase" method in the international pharmacovigilance database VigiBase to identify the risk of RA following COVID-19 vaccination compared with other nonlive vaccines. Using the French Pharmacovigilance Database (FPVD), a descriptive analysis was carried out for RA cases after COVID-19 immunization and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to compare variables in the new-onset vs. flare-up groups. In 2021, 2,387 cases of RA were reported from 2,817,902 adverse drug reactions associated with COVID-19 vaccines recorded in VigiBase. The reporting odds ratio of RA onset with COVID-19 vaccines compared with the other nonlive vaccines was 0.66 (P < 0.0001). The FPVD reported 161 cases of RA with COVID-19 vaccines, including 77 new-onset RA and 84 cases of RA flare-up. In 88 cases (84.7%), RA occurred after the first dose. The mean time between vaccination and disease onset was 14 ± 21 days, and the delay was significantly shorter in the flare-up group. We do not show a higher risk of RA after COVID-19 vaccination compared with other nonlive vaccines in adults. De novo RA was more likely to happen quickly, be more severe, and have a worse outcome than flares in patients with RA.

Pharmacovigilance follow-up of patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

In the context of COVID-19 pandemic, a national pharmacovigilance survey was set up in March 2020. The purpose of this survey was to ensure continuous monitoring of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients with COVID-19, not only related to the drugs used in this indication but also related to all drugs administered to these patients or suspected of having promoted the infection. This descriptive study was based on data extracted from the French Pharmacovigilance Database from 1 January 2020 to 30 September 2021. Misuse was also analysed through the MESANGE project. The ADRs were classified according to three groups: "drugs used to treat COVID-19", "other drugs administered to COVID-19 positive patients" and "drugs suspected of having promoted COVID-19". The data were also presented according to 2 periods (period one was from January to June 2020 and period two from July 2020 onwards). Among 2189 included cases, 67.1% were serious. Cases were mainly related to "other drugs administrated to COVID-19 positive patients" (58.5%) followed by "drugs used to treat COVID-19" (33.7%) and "drugs suspected of having promoted COVID-19" (7.8%). Drugs used to treat COVID-19 and their main safety profile were different depending on the period: mostly hydroxychloroquine (51%) with heart injury and lopinavir/ritonavir (42%) with liver injury for the first period, and dexamethasone (46%) with hyperglycemia and tocilizumab (28%) with liver injury for the second period. The drugs suspected of worsening COVID-19 differed in both periods especially for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs mainly reported in period 1 (41.5% versus 8.2% in period 2). Other immunosuppressive drugs were in the majority in the second period (85.7%), with mainly methotrexate (15.3%), anti-CD20 (15.3%) and anti-TNF alpha (10.5%). No confirmed safety signal was identified among other drugs administered to patients with COVID-19. The profile of ADRs and suspected drugs was similar between the 2 periods. The study of misuse in outpatient settings identified in both periods mainly hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ivermectin and zinc±vitamin C. This survey, based on real-time pharmacological and medical assessment of ADRs and weekly meetings in a specific national committee, made it possible to identify relevant safety signals which contribute to patient care with no delay. The main safety signal highlighted was serious cardiac damage under hydroxychloroquine, alone or combined with azithromycin and also with lopinavir/ritonavir. This signal has contributed to the evolution of the recommendations for these 2 drugs. The methodology of this survey has been taken over and is still going on for the pharmacovigilance monitoring of vaccines against COVID-19, for monoclonal antibodies used against COVID-19 and also for Paxlovid® (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) which benefit from dedicated surveys.

Pharmacovigilance in High-Income Countries: Current Developments and a Review of Literature

The world bank has classified 80 economies based on their Gross National Income (GNI) per capita as High-Income. European Medicines Agency (EMA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) are the major regulatory stakeholders driving global pharmacovigilance regulations. The purpose of this article is to describe pharmacovigilance systems and processes in high-income countries, particularly those that are also members of the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH). All high-income countries are members of the WHO PIDM. The income level of a country has a direct relationship with medicine safety measures. All ten pioneering members of the Uppsala monitoring centre are from high-income countries and were the first responders after the thalidomide tragedy by making drug evaluation committees, introducing the ADR reporting forms and taking safety measures. Despite access to the VigiBase, some countries have separate databases for managing and analyzing data like Canada Vigilance online database, FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, the French pharmacovigilance database and European Union's system Eudravigilance. All high-income countries have robust pharmacovigilance systems. USFDA and EMA are the world leaders in the field of pharmacovigilance. Most high-income countries follow EMA guidelines. Medicine safety is directly influenced by a country's income level.

Comprehensive description of adult-onset Still's disease after COVID-19 vaccination

Cases of adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) have been reported after COVID-19 vaccination. Here we provide a comprehensive description and analysis of all cases of AOSD reported in the literature and in pharmacovigilance databases through April 2022. Disproportionality analyses of pharmacovigilance data were performed in order to further explore the association between vaccination and AOSD. We included 159 patients, 144 from the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database and 15 from the literature. Detailed clinical characteristics were described for the cases from the literature and from the French pharmacovigilance database (n = 9). The cases of AOSD after COVID-19 vaccination concerned women in 52.2% of cases. The median age was 43.4 years. More than 80% of AOSD reports occurred during the first three weeks and concerned mostly the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. We identified 14.5% of disease flare with a median time-to-onset of AOSD flare-up significantly shorter than for the new onset form. More than 90% patients received steroids. Although all cases were considered serious and required hospitalization, most cases presented a favorable outcome (67.1%) with a good response to corticosteroid therapy with a mean time to recovery of 7.2 days. Disproportionality analyses suggested that AOSD was associated with COVID-19 vaccines as well as other vaccines. AOSD was nearly five times more frequently reported with COVID-19 vaccines than with all other drugs. Clinicians should be informed about the potential risk of AOSD onset or flare following COVID vaccines and the importance of its early detection to optimize its management.

Adverse drug reactions in pregnant women: Do they differ from those in non-pregnant women of childbearing age?

Pharmacoepidemiological research in pregnant women has focused on adverse drug reactions for the course of pregnancy or for the unborn child, but little is known on the risks for the mother. We reported the results of a study that compared adverse drug reactions in pregnant women with non-pregnant women of childbearing age, and investigated whether which types of adverse reactions were more often reported in pregnant women and which drugs were more often involved. This study was carried out in the French pharmacovigilance database (BNPV). We compared adverse drug reactions reported between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019 in pregnant women with those reported in of non-pregnant women of childbearing age. We cross-matched each pregnant woman with three non-pregnant women of childbearing age according to geographic area, age and year the adverse reaction was reported. Data analysis revealed that serious adverse reactions were more frequently reported in pregnant women, including anaphylactic reactions. Other adverse reactions including tachycardia, hypotension and hepatic injury were also more frequent in pregnant women than in non-pregnant women of the same age. This could be explained by physiological changes in pregnancy that lead to greater sensitivity to certain adverse reactions. Some drugs, such as phloroglucinol, metoclopramide, iron, atosiban and nifedipine, were more frequently involved in adverse reactions in pregnant women. These drugs are specifically used during pregnancy, which may explain why they are over-represented in adverse reactions. This is the first comparative descriptive study on drug adverse reactions in pregnant women. Specific epidemiological and pharmacokinetic studies are necessary to confirm these results and better understand the differences observed to improve the monitoring of pregnant women exposed to certain drugs.

Safety profile of the lopinavir/ritonavir combination before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

When the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic began, there were no effective treatments assessed by clinical trials. In this context, in France, the French Public Health Council issued, from 5 March, 2020, several proposed recommendations for the therapeutic management of this new disease. This included the use of combination lopinavir/ritonavir, which is usually indicated as HIV treatment. Thanks to the reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to the French Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers, several safety signals including hepatobiliary and cardiovascular were quickly identified. This study aimed to compare the ADRs reported with lopinavir/ritonavir used in its usual indication prior to the pandemic with the ADRs reported with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) indication. Cases of ADRs were extracted from the French Pharmacovigilance Database. ADRs were compared between the two periods: pre-COVID (1985 to 31 December 2019) and COVID (1 January 2020 to 21 July 2020). Patients with COVID-19 were found to have a different safety profile, with significantly more damage to the liver (43% of ADRs), heart (10.6%) and kidneys (7.1%). The ADRs reported before the pandemic were mainly gastrointestinal and cutaneous. This different safety profile may be related to the effect of the virus on the organs, the patient profile (age, medical history…) and the drugs associated with lopinavir/ritonavir. Our study should serve as a reminder that the safety profile of a drug can depend on its use. Spontaneous reporting and pharmacovigilance have a critical role in alerting health professionals to "new" ADRs reported with well-known drugs.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Cytopenias: About 68 Cases from the French Pharmacovigilance Database.

Simple SummaryData on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related cytopenias are scarce. The aim of the study was to further characterize grade ≥ 2 ICI-related cytopenias using the French pharmacovigilance database. Immune thrombocytopenia and autoimmune hemolytic anemia were the most frequently reported ICI-related cytopenias (50.7% and 25.3%, respectively). Nearly half were grade ≥ 4, and 4.4% of patients died from cytopenia-related complications. Using the French pharmacovigilance database, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of ICI-related cytopenias that are rare but potentially life-threatening adverse drug reactions. Early recognition and timely initiation of appropriate treatment are key in their management in clinical practice.Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related cytopenias have been poorly described. This study aimed to further characterize ICI-related cytopenias, using the French pharmacovigilance database. All grade ≥ 2 hematological adverse drug reactions involving at least one ICI coded as suspected or interacting drug according to the World Health Organization criteria and reported up to 31 March 2022, were extracted from the French pharmacovigilance database. Patients were included if they experienced ICI-related grade ≥ 2 cytopenia. We included 68 patients (75 ICI-related cytopenias). Sixty-three percent were male, and the median age was 63.0 years. Seven patients (10.3%) had a previous history of autoimmune disease. Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) were the most frequently reported (50.7% and 25.3%, respectively). The median time to onset of ICI-related cytopenias was 2 months. Nearly half were grade ≥ 4, and three patients died from bleeding complications of refractory ITP and from thromboembolic disease with active AIHA. Out of 61 evaluable responses, complete or partial remission was observed after conventional treatment in 72.1% of ICI-related cytopenias. Among the 10 patients with ICI resumption after grade ≥ 2 ICI-related cytopenia, three relapsed. ICI-related cytopenias are rare but potentially life-threatening. Further studies are needed to identify risk factors of ICI-related cytopenias.

Peripheral neuropathies after BRAF and/or MEK inhibitor treatment: A pharmacovigilance study.

Reports suggested the potential occurrence of peripheral neuropathies (PN) in patients treated with BRAF (BRAFi) and/or MEK inhibitors (MEKi) for BRAF-activated tumours. We aimed to better characterize these PN. We queried the French pharmacovigilance database for all cases of PN attributed to BRAFi and/or MEKi. Fifteen patients were identified. Two main clinical PN phenotypes were seen. Six patients presented a length-dependent, axonal polyneuropathy: symptoms were mostly sensory and affecting the lower limbs; management and outcome were variable. Nine patients developed a demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: symptoms affected the four limbs and included hypoesthesia, weakness and ataxia; cranial nerves were involved in four cases; most patients received intravenous immunoglobulins or glucocorticoids, with variable outcome; one patient was rechallenged with a different BRAFi/MEKi combination with a rapid relapse in symptoms. In conclusion, patients under BRAFi/MEKi therapy may develop treatment-induced PN. Two main phenotypes can occur: a symmetric, axonal, length-dependent polyneuropathy and a demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.