French Early Access Program Research Articles

Capmatinib efficacy for METex14 non-small cell lung cancer patients: Results of the IFCT-2104 CAPMATU study

BackgroundCapmatinib is a selective MET inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in a phase II study of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring METex14 mutations. However, the real-world outcomes of capmatinib are largely unknown. From June 2019, the French Early Access Program (EAP) provided capmatinib to METex14 NSCLC patients who were ineligible for or for whom first-line standard therapies had failed. MethodsIFCT-2104 CAPMATU was a multicenter study that included all METex14 NSCLC patients who received capmatinib as part of the EAP until August 2021. The primary endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). ResultsA total of 146 patients were included. The median age was 74.9 years, 56.6 % were never-smokers, and 32.4 % had brain metastases. The median TTF, median PFS and median OS from capmatinib initiation were 5.1 months (95 % CI 4.2–6.0), 4.8 months (95 % CI 4.0–6.0) and 10.4 months (95 % CI 8.3–13.2), respectively. Evaluation of the best response to capmatinib was available for 134 patients and resulted in an ORR of 55.3 % (95 % CI 46.8 %-63.6 %). The median PFS was 7.7 months for treatment-naïve patients and 6.0 and 4.1 months for patients who had received one or 2 + prior lines of treatment, respectively. For patients with brain metastases, the median PFS was 3.0 months. Capmatinib had a known and manageable safety profile, with grade 3 to 4 adverse events, mostly peripheral edema (8.2 %), occurring in 17.8 % of patients. ConclusionIn this large real-world study of METex14 NSCLC patients, the efficacy of capmatinib was confirmed, with a manageable safety profile, even in patients with brain metastases and in those who received several lines of treatment. This study reinforces the key role of capmatinib for these patients.

Avacopan for anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies-associated vasculitis: a multicenter real-world study.

Avacopan, a selective C5aR1 inhibitor, recently emerged as a glucocorticoid (GCs) sparing agent in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). We aim to evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of avacopan given outside randomized clinical trials or with severe kidney involvement. In this multicentre retrospective study, we reviewed the clinical charts of patients with AAV and contraindication to high dose of GCs who received avacopan 30 mg b.i.d plus standard-of-care regimen owing to the French early access program between 2020 and 2023. Efficacy and safety data were recorded using a standardized case report form. Among the 31 patients (median age 72 years), 10 had a relapsing AAV, twenty had anti-myeloperoxidase antibodies, and thirty had kidney vasculitis. Induction regimen included rituximab (n = 27), cyclophosphamide (n = 2), or both (n = 2). Five patients did not receive GCs. Despite rapid GCs tapering (which were withdrawn in 23 patients before month 3), 25 patients (81%) had a favorable outcome and no severe adverse event. The estimated glomerular filtration rate increased from 19 [15; 34] to 35 mL/min/1.73m2 [23; 45] at month 12 (p< 0.05), independently of kidney biopsies findings. One patient developed refractory AAV and two had a relapse while receiving avacopan. At month 12, ANCA remained positive in 10/18 patients (55.5%). Two patients developed severe adverse events leading to a withdrawal of avacopan (hepatitis and age-related macular degeneration). The GCs' sparing effect of avacopan was confirmed, even in patients with severe kidney vasculitis, but further studies are required to identify the optimal dosing of GCs when avacopan is used.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of amivantamab for exon 20 EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in French early access program: Amexon 20 GFPC.

e20529 Background: Amivantamab is a bispecific EGFR/MET antibody approved for patients with NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions. In France, early access has made it possible to use it as a second or further-line treatment after at least one line of chemotherapy. Methods: This is a retrospective multicentric cohort of consecutive patients with an adenocarcinoma and EGFR exon 20 insertions, who received at least one dose of amivantamab as part of the French early access program from September 3th, 2021 (date of approval in the French early access program) until April 30th, 2022. Patients gave consent for the data collection and were enrolled in 28 sites. Primary end point was Real world Progression free Survival (Rw PFS) and secondary endpoints were description of clinical characteristics, best response, duration of treatment, overall survival (OS), CNS activity, toxicities and subsequent treatment. Results: Thirty-nine patients received amivantamab in early French access. Median age was 60 years [39-83]; 64 % of patients were female and 54% never smoker; 33% had PS 2 or more and 66 % had brain metastasis at inclusion. Amivantamab was administered as a second or third line and more in 30% and 70% of patients respectively. Patients received a median number of 10 injections [1-47]. Overall, 37 patients were evaluable for response; response rate was 35 % and disease control rate (DCR) was 62%. After a median follow-up of 11.3 months [8-16.7], median Rw PFS and OS were 3.5 months [2.6-5.8] and 11.3 months [8-17.8] respectively. Rw PFS and OS at 6 months were 33.3% and 74.4% respectively. Duration of response was 5.8 months [2.3-11.9]. Overall, 23 patients were evaluable for CNS response; 26 % had CNS response and CNS DCR was 69%. Main sites of progression were lung (43%), bone (28%), liver (12.8%) and brain (10%). Grade III/IV adverse events were reported in 11 patients (28.2%), mainly skin toxicity (n = 5), infusion reaction (n = 2), digestive disorders (n = 1), interstitial pneumonia (n = 1), neurological disorders (n = 1), fever (n = 1). Amivantamab was permanently discontinued due to toxicities in 4 patients (10.3%). Subsequent treatment was administered to 21 patients (53.8%) after amivantamab, mostly consisting of mono chemotherapy (n = 13). Conclusions: Our real-world multicenter analysis showed that amivantamab was an effective monotherapy treatment in second line and after for patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions. No new toxicities were reported.

Sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients treated at Institut Curie Hospitals: efficacy, safety, and impact of brain metastases

BackgroundSacituzumab govitecan (SG) has been approved by FDA in April 2021 for pre-treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), following the ASCENT trial results.MethodsWe set up an ambispective bicentric cohort study to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of SG in patients with mTNBC treated at Institut Curie Hospitals, with a focus on patients with brain metastases.ResultsThis study included 99 patients treated through the French Early Access Program to SG from May 2021 to January 2023. Median age was 55 years [26–89], N = 8 patients (8%) had BRCA1/2 mutation, N = 12 (12%) de novo stage IV disease and N = 31 (31%) brain metastases. Patients had previously received a median of two [1–10] lines of treatment in advanced setting. After a median follow-up of 9.7 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.9 months (95%CI[3.4–5.0]) and 8.6 months (95%CI[7.1–11.9]), respectively, while objective response rate was 29% (95%CI[21–39]). Among patients with brain metastases, median PFS and OS were 3.7 months (95%CI[2.6–6.2]) and 6.7 months (95%CI[6.3–NR]), respectively, with intracranial tumor responses. Dose reductions were required in N = 17 patients (17%) within a median of three [2–11] cycles, due to gastrointestinal toxicity (N = 6; 6%), hematological toxicity (N = 9; 9%) including febrile neutropenia (N = 2; 2%), liver enzyme elevation (N = 1; 1%), and physical deterioration (N = 1; 1%). There was no related death to SG.ConclusionsThe observed response rate and safety of SG are consistent with the results of the ASCENT trial, with efficacy observed in patients with brain metastases, but observed PFS and OS are numerically shorter.

Efficacy and Tolerance of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel in Adults with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia : A Graall Study from the Descar-T Registry

Background : Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) was recently approved for adult patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) based on the results of the ZUMA-3 phase 2 study. After a median follow-up of 39 months, brexu-cel showed a complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate of 71% and a median overall survival of 26 months (Shah B, et al. ASCO 2023). In the present study, we aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of brexu-cel in a real-life cohort of adult BCP-ALL patients included in the French early access program. Methods : In this Group for Research on Adult Acute Lymphoblastic leukemia (GRAALL) study, we performed an analysis of the DESCAR-T registry which collects real-life data of patients treated with CAR T-cells since July 2018 in France. All patients who underwent a leukapheresis with an intent to manufacture brexu-cel were included (N=80). Efficacy and safety analyses were performed in the 64/66 infused patients with available response assessment after infusion. The data cut-off was June 2023. The present study reports on best overall response, overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), as well as immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) incidence and grading (according to ASTCT Consensus). Results : Between May 2019 and February 2023, 80 adults with R/R BCP-ALL from 22 French centers had a leukapheresis for brexu-cel. Among them, 14 patients (18%) were not infused because of death (8 pts), progression (1 pt), manufacturing failure (2 pts), or other causes (3 pts). Among the 64 infused patients with available response assessment, median age was 43.5 yrs (range, 22-69). A Philadelphia(Ph)-chromosome was found in 20/64 (31%). Patients had received a median of 3 (range, 1-6) prior lines of treatment including blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in 67%, 19% and 70% of patients respectively. Twelve patients (19%) had an active CNS disease (CNS2/3) prior to apheresis and 18/40 (45%) had bone marrow blasts ≥ 25% before lymphodepletion (LD). ECOG before infusion was ≥2 in 6/64 (9%) patients. All patients received fludarabine and cyclophosphamide as LD. Median time from apheresis to infusion was 40 days (range, 27-99). CRS and ICANS occurred in 48/64 (77%, grade 3+ in 6%) and 28/64 (45%, grade 3+ in 8%) of patients respectively and were reversible. A CR was achieved in 49/64 patients (77%) of whom 23/25 (92%) were MRD-negative. An older age, a prior allo-HSCT, and the occurrence of CRS were associated with significantly higher CR rates. The median follow-up was 13 months. Three patients were bridged to an allo-HSCT in continuous complete remission (second allo-HSCT for 2 of them). The median RFS and OS were 12.9 months and 15.6 months respectively (Figure). In patients who achieved a CR, median OS was 25.8 months (Figure). Patients with CNS involvement before leukapheresis had a significantly shorter RFS (HR 5.4, 95%CI 1.9-15.8, p=0.002) and OS (HR 3.3, 95%CI 1.4-8.2, p=0.008). Number of prior treatment lines, prior inotuzumab, prior blinatumomab, or pre-LD BM blast% were not associated with outcome. A better OS was observed in patients with prior allo-HSCT (HR .4, 95%CI 0.2-0.9, p=0.04). Conclusion : This multicenter real-life study confirms the efficacy and acceptable safety profile of brexu-cel in adult patients with R/R BCP-ALL. It also suggests that patients with CNS involvement, that were not eligible to ZUMA-3 study, have a limited benefit of brexu-cel when compared to other patients.

Real-Word Experience of CAR T-Cells in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma : A Descart Registry Analysis from the Lysa

Background: Anti-CD19 CAR T-cells have revolutionized the treatment of aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) by demonstrating durable responses. Although follow-up remain short, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel, ZUMA-5) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel, ELARA) demonstrated promising complete response rates (CRR) of 86% and 69%, respectively, in phase II trials including relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL).. Tisa-cel and axi-cel are now approved after at least 2 lines of systemic therapy by the FDA. Few real-word evidence (RWE) data have been reported so far. Methods: Patients were eligible if aged &amp;gt;18 years, had FL histology (grade 1-3A) and had received at least 2 previous treatment lines for tisa-cel and 3 for axi-cel according to the French early access program label. From Dec 2021 to Jan 2023, a total of 112 patients were included in early access program by 21 French centers and in DESCAR-T registry (NCT04328298), among them 87 were infused with a CAR product. At the data cut-off on March 2023, 70 had at least 1 month of follow-up (FU) with PET-CT evaluation, and thus were considered for the safety and efficacy sets (62 tisa-cel and 8 axi-cel,). Results: Patient and disease characteristics were as follows: 46 males (65.7%), median age 62 years (range: 34-79), 3 median prior lines of therapy (range 2-9, including bi-specific antibody in 12.9% and autoSCT in 44.3%), FLIPI 0-2 in 40.5% and 3-5 in 49.5%, bulky disease (&amp;gt;5cm) in 22%, and LDH &amp;gt; N 52.2%. POD24 after 1 st systemic immunochemotherapy (IC) was reported in 44 patients (62.8%). Before CAR T-cell infusion, 58.6% of patients received a bridging therapy (20 (48.8%) chemotherapy, 25 (61%) monoclonal antibodies, 4 (9.8%) kinase inhibitors, 15 (36.6%) lenalidomide, and 3 (7.3%) radiotherapy). All patients but one received a fludarabine and cyclophosphamide-based lymphodepletion. Median time from order to infusion was 48 days (range 34-204), and 41 days (30-328) from leukapheresis to infusion. Median FU was 7.3 months [6.4; 8.2] from product order, and 5.4 months [3.4; 6] from CAR infusion. Best ORR and CRR were 97.5 and 87.5%, respectively with 72.5% of patients in CR at 1 month with projected DOR and DOCR of 72.4% [56.8; 83.1%], and 79.7% [62.7%; 89.6%], respectively. Projected 6-months PFS, OS, were 71.8% [95% CI, 56.6%; 82.4%], 97.4% [83.2%; 99.6%], respectively. Fifteen (21.4%) patients progressed (median time from infusion to first relapse: 3 months (range 1-10 mo). Only one patient died from lymphoma progression. Any-grade CRS and ICANS were reported for 74.3% and 27.1% of patients, but grade 3-4 CRS/ICANS were very unfrequent,1.4% and 4.3%, respectively. No grade 5 was reported. Persisting grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities at 1 and 3 months were: neutropenia (50% and 12.3%), thrombocytopenia (18.6% and 0%), and anemia (8.6% and 0%). Medically relevant bacterial and viral infections were reported in 20% and 14.3% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Although longer FU is needed to assess disease control, RWE data from the DESCAR-T registry confirm the excellent response rates and safety profile of CAR T-cells in R/R FL after at least 2 lines of previous therapy.

AZD7442 utilization for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Against COVID-19 in a French Early Access Program

Abstract Background AZD7442, a combination of 2 neutralizing antibodies, has been shown to reduce symptomatic COVID-19 risk by 83% at 6 months among high-risk individuals in a Phase 3 trial (PROVENT). The French Health Authorities authorized AZD7442 use in immunocompromised patients through Early Access Program (EAP). Eligibility for EAP was serological anti-spike levels of &amp;lt; 260 BAU/ml and very high risk of severe COVID. This abstract aims to describe the AZD7442 eligible population in France and characterize AZD7442 uptake in the EAP. Methods This is a retrospective observational database analysis of the EAP data. Demographics, and clinical characteristics of participants are described. Results 27,782 patients were included in the EAP between 12/15/2021 and 11/30/2022. AZD7442 was mostly prescribed by onco-hematologists (24.2%), followed by nephrologists (19.9%), internal medicine specialists (15.6%), and rheumatologists (6.5%). 50% of participants were over 65 years, 54.7% were male. The majority (96.7%) had received at least three vaccine doses at inclusion. Most common comorbidities were cancer (34.9%), chronic kidney disease (23.7%), hypertension (23.2%), cardiovascular disease (19.4% &amp;gt;2CV factors), and diabetes (9.2%). 6 months follow-up data were available for 2106 patients. Conclusions In the EAP, health care professionals prioritized IC patients at the highest risk of severe COVID-19, consistent with the authorization granted in France. However, based on the approved criteria, HCP have the potential to broaden the use of AZD7442 among different IC groups which can lead to more equitable access. The large size of the EAP presents an opportunity to generate evidence regarding the effectiveness of AZD7442. Lack of follow up data highlights the need to enrich the EAP data to study relevant effectiveness endpoints as COVID-19 hospitalizations and mortality. An innovative observational comparative study is planned by combining EAP data and French National Claims database SNDS. Key messages • These findings could guide future efforts to implement COVID-19 prophylaxis measures. • The large size of the EAP presents an opportunity to generate evidence regarding the effectiveness of AZD7442.

Long-term effectiveness and treatment sequences in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer receiving atezolizumab plus chemotherapy: Results of the IFCT-1905 CLINATEZO real-world study

BackgroundSmall cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a tendency towards recurrence and limited survival. Standard-of-care in 1st-line is platinum-etoposide chemotherapy plus atezolizumab or durvalumab,based on landmarkclinical trials. MethodsIFCT-1905 CLINATEZO is a nationwide, non-interventional, retrospectivestudy of patients with extensive-SCLC receivingatezolizumab plus chemotherapy as part of French Early Access Program. Objectives were to analyse effectiveness,safetyand subsequent treatments. ResultsThe population analyzed included 518 patients who received atezolizumabin 65 participating centers. There were 66.2% male,mean age was 65.7 years; 89.1% had a performance status (PS) 0/1 and 26.6% brain metastases. Almost all(95.9%) were smokers. Fifty-five (10.6%) received at least 1 previous treatment. Median number of atezolizumab injections was 7.0 (range [1.0–48.0]) for a median duration of 4.9 months (95% CI 4.5–5.1). Atezolizumab was continued beyond progression in 122 patients (23.6%) for a median duration of 1.9 months (95% CI: [1.4–2.3]). Best objective response was complete and partialin 19 (3.9%) and 378 (77.1%)patients. Stable diseasewas observed in 50 patients (10.2%). Median follow-up was30.8 months (95% CI: [29.9–31.5]). Median overall survival (OS), 12-, 24-month OS rates were 11.3 months (95% CI: [10.1–12.4]), 46.7% (95% CI [42.3–50.9]) and 21.2% (95% CI [17.7–24.8]). Median real-world progression-free survival, 6-, 12-month rates were 5.2 months (95% CI [5.0–5.4]), 37.5% (95% CI [33.3–41.7]) and 15.2% (95% CI [12.2–18.6]). For patients with PS 0/1, median OS was 12.2 months (95% CI [11.0–13.5]). For patients with previous treatment, median OS was 14.9 months (95% CI [10.1–21.5]). Three-hundred-and-twenty-six patients(66.4%) received subsequent treatment and27 (5.2%) were still underatezolizumabat date of last news. ConclusionsIFCT-1905 CLINATEZO shows reproductibility, in real-life,ofIMpower-133survival outcomes, possibly attributed to selection of patients fit for this regimen, adoption of pragmatic approaches,including concurrent radiotherapy and treatment beyond progression.

Atezolizumab and paclitaxel as first line therapy in advanced triple-negative breast cancer patients included in the French early access program

Following the results of the IMpassion130 trial, an early access program (EAP) was opened in France, allowing patients with PD-L1-positive advanced triple negative breast cancer (aTNBC) to receive a combination of paclitaxel and atezolizumab as first line therapy. This EAP was later discontinued when the IMpassion131 trial read out with negative results. We performed a retrospective multicentric analysis in patients who were prospectively enrolled in the French EAP. Efficacy and toxicity data were obtained on 64 patients treated from August 2019 to August 2020 in 10 French cancer centers. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.1 months (95% CI [3.0–5.8]) and 17.9 months (95% CI [12.4–NR]), respectively. The 6-months PFS rate was 28% (95% CI [16–40%]) (N = 18/64), while N = 33/64 patients (52%, 95% CI [38–63%]) experienced a tumor response. Exploratory subgroup analyses retrieved that corticosteroid use at inclusion in the EAP, before treatment initiation, was the only independent unfavorable prognostic factor for PFS (HR 2.7, 95% CI [1.3–5.6]). No new safety signal was observed. This real-life study, unique by its setting (EAP granted by anticipation and later withdrawn), suggests atezolizumab and paclitaxel has a limited efficacy in PD-L1-positive aTNBC, especially in patients receiving corticosteroids as comedication before treatment start.

Access to innovation through clinical trials and the national early access program for patients with lung cancer in France: focus on atezolizumab and durvalumab.

Tumor genomic profiling and PD-L1 testing mean lung cancer management can be tackled through a personalized approach. Targeted therapies and immunotherapy are necessary to improve survival and preserve the patients' quality of life. Early access to innovation before marketing authorization (MA) is possible in France through clinical trials and an early-access program called a Temporary Authorization for Use (ATU), which is a unique regulatory system in Europe. This study aims to assess the impact of early access to innovation through clinical trials and ATUs in thoracic oncology. Data from clinical trials between 2018 and 2021 and ATUs between 2005 and 2019 were collected internally and assessed for drugs in thoracic oncology, with specific focus on 2 ATUs, respectively, atezolizumab and durvalumab. From 2018 to 2021, the National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products authorized 145 clinical trials in lung cancer. Between 2005 and 2019, 19 drugs obtained an EU MA or an MA extension for a therapeutic indication in lung cancer. During this period, 11 of these drugs were granted an ATU, corresponding to 6851 patients treated. Of this total number of patients, data were collected for 33.1% and 71.2%, who received durvalumab and atezolizumab, respectively. Real-life efficacy data were consistent with the clinical trial data. Over the past 15years, clinical trials and the French early access program have allowed considerable early access to therapeutic innovation in real life for patients, especially in thoracic oncology.

Long-term effectiveness and treatment sequences in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer receiving atezolizumab plus chemotherapy: Results of the IFCT-1905 CLINATEZO real-world study.

8583 Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive type of lung cancer with a tendency towards early recurrence and limited survival. Standard-of-care in 1st-line treatment is platinum-etoposide chemotherapy plus anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab or durvalumab, based on landmark, randomized, phase 3 clinical trials. Methods: IFCT 1905-CLINATEZO is a nationwide, non-interventional, retrospective chart review study of patients (pts) with extensive-stage SCLC who received atezolizumab + chemotherapy as part of the French early access program between May 2019 and January 2020 (1402 pts). Inclusions were exhaustive per participating centers (65/307). Data collection run from February to November 2021. Key objectives were to assess effectiveness and safety of atezolizumab + chemotherapy and analyze subsequent treatment sequences. Results: The population analyzed included 518 out of the 1402 pts. There were 66% male and mean age was 65.7 years (range: 36.7-88.0); 89% had a performance status (PS) 0/1 and 27% brain metastases. Almost all the pts (96%) were smokers, with a median number of pack-years of 40. Fifty-five pts (10.6%) received at least 1 previous treatment. Median number of atezolizumab injections was 7 (range: [1-48] ) for a median duration of 4.9 months (95% CI 4.5-5.1). Twenty-seven pts (5%) were under ongoing treatment at date of last news. Atezolizumab was continued beyond disease progression in 122 pts (24%) for a median duration of 1.9 months (95% CI 1.4-2.3). Best objective response was complete and partial response in 19 (3.9%) and 378 pts (77.1%) respectively; stable disease was observed in 50 pts (10.2%). After a median follow-up of 30.8 months (95% CI: [29.9-31.5]), median overall survival (OS), 12- and 24-months OS rates were 11.3 months (95% CI: [10.1-12.4]), 46.7% (95% CI 42.3-50.9) and 21.2% (95% CI 17.7-24.8) respectively. Median real world-progression free survival (based on date of the first source evidence for progression referenced by the treating physician), 6- and 12-months rates were 5.2 months (95% CI 5.0-5.4), 37.5% (95% CI 33.3-41.7) and 15.2% (95% CI 12.2-18.6) respectively. For the pts with PS 0/1, median OS was 12.2 months (95% CI 11.0-13.5). For the 55 pts with previous treatment, median OS was 14.9 months (95% CI 10.1-21.5). A total of 326 (66.4%) pts received subsequent treatment. Conclusions: IFCT 1905-CLINATEZO study shows the reproducibility, in a real-life setting, of the key survival outcomes of IMpower-133, that may be attributed to the selection of pts fit for this regimen, the adoption of pragmatic approaches for the management of pts receiving atezolizumab, that includes concurrent radiotherapy and treatment beyond progression, and the high proportion of pts treated with 2nd-line therapies, mostly based on chemotherapy.

IFCT-2105 lurbiclin real-world effectiveness and treatment sequences in patients (pts) with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) who received lurbinectedin as part of the French Early Access Program (EAP-ATU).

8584 Background: Novel options are needed for pts with ES-SCLC after the failure of first-line chemotherapy. Lurbinectedin demonstrated efficacy in a landmark phase II study [Trigo et al. Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):645], and was granted EAP-ATU in France in June 2020. Methods: Multicenter, retrospective cohort of consecutive pts with histologically or cytologically confirmed ES-SCLC, who received at least one dose of treatment with lurbinectedin as part of the French EAP-ATU from June 2020 until March 2021, and gave consent for the data collection, were enrolled in 47 sites. Primary and secondary endpoints were description of clinical characteristics, and exposure to treatment, response, PFS, OS, safety. Results: 312 pts – 64% male, median age 65 years, 72% PS0-1, 47% with brain metastasis, 58% with previous immunotherapy – were enrolled. Lurbinectedin was administered as second-line in 44% of pts; 58% were chemotherapy-refractory. Pts received a median number of 3 cycles of lurbinectedin. Concurrent radiotherapy on metastases was delivered to 38% of pts. Lurbinectedin was discontinued because of progression/death/toxicity/other reasons in 83%/8%/5%/4% of pts. Grade3/4 events were observed in 9%/5% of pts. Response rate was 22% [95%CI 17-27%], disease control rate was 38% [95%CI 32-44%]. After a median follow-up of 20.8 months, median PFS and OS were 1.9 [95%CI 1.8-2] and 4.7 [95%CI 4-5.4] months; 6-month PFS and OS were 7% [4-10%] and 42% [95%CI 37-48%]. PS≤2 and chemotherapy-free interval≥90days were associated with significantly longer OS (HR = 0.71 [95%CI 0.53-0.95] and HR = 0.58 [95% CI 0.44-076] respectively). Main sites of progression were the lung (39% of pts), the brain (39% of pts), the liver (30% of pts), and the mediastinum (30% of pts). Subsequent treatment was administered to 154 pts after discontinuation of lurbinectedin, mostly consisting of topotecan (26% of pts); response/disease control rates, and median PFS of first subsequent treatment were 11% [95%CI 6-17%], 35% [95%CI 27-44%], and 1.9 [95%CI 1.7-2.3] months. Conclusions: Lurbinectedin provides an additional option from second-line for ES-SCLC, with efficacy outcomes comparable to that of historical treatments.

Abstract P3-06-09: Real-world toxicity of pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant regimen in patients with early triple negative breast cancer

Abstract Background Pembrolizumab (pembro, anti-PD-1 antibody) combined to chemotherapy (CT) in neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting has demonstrated its efficacy for early triple negative breast cancer (eTNBC). Pembro obtained FDA marketing authorization on July 26, 2021 and is available in France through the French Early Access Program. Methods We built an ambispective cohort that aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the pembro-CT combination in the real world setting in patients with eTNBC. This study included patients treated from September 2021 to May 2022, at Institut Curie, France. Patients provided written authorization to report their clinical data. We report here the safety results. Results Between September 2021 and May 2022, 51 patients were included. Median age was 49 years [29; 68]. Germline mutations were recorded in 8 patients (22.2% of 36 tested patients). All pts were ECOG PS 0 or 1. Baseline clinical TNM stage were T1 (8 pts, 15.7%), T2 (30 pts, 58.9%), T3 (7 pts, 13.7%) and T4 (6 pts, 11.7%). Out of 37 pts (72.5%) with radiological axillary lymph node involvement, 19 pts (51.4%) had positive node involvement confirmed by guided fine needle aspiration. SBR grade 2 and 3 were observed in 9 (17.6%) and 42 (82.4%) pts, respectively. HER2 score was 0 or 1+/2+(FISH neg) for 31 (60.8 %) and 20 pts (39.2 %), respectively. A CPS score ≥ 10 was observed in 19 pts (50% of 38 tested patients). The CT backbone was a combination of carboplatin (Cb) plus weekly paclitaxel (wP) 4 courses (with Cb regimen AUC 5 q3W (81.1%), AUC4 q3w (5.4%) and AUC1,5 q1w (13.5%), and wP 80 mg/m²), followed by standard AC60/600 q3w for 4 courses. Out of the 37 pts (72.5%) who completed the Cb + wP 4 courses, all experienced adverse events (AEs), including 21 pts (56.8%) with at least 1 grade ≥ 3 AE (anemia 5.4%, thrombopenia 5.4%, neutropenia 51.5%, neuropathy 2.7%). Transfusion support was needed for 8 pts (21.6%). Grade ≥ 2 neuropathy occurred in 3 pts (8.1 %). Dose reduction and drug discontinuation were performed in 9 (24.3%) and 5 pts (13.5%), respectively. On the entire cohort, 15 pts (29.4%) had IrAE all grades: dysthyroidism (6 pts, 11.7%), skin toxicity (2 pts, 3.9%), adrenal insufficiency (1 pt, 2%), hypophysitis (1 pt, 2%), immune-allergic nephropathy (1 pt, 2%), suspicion of myocarditis (1 pt, 2%), hepatitis (1 pt, 2%) and ophthalmologic AE (1 pt, 2%). Consequently, after a median follow up of 5 months, pembro postponement and permanent discontinuation were performed in 7 (13,7%) and 5 pts (9,8%), respectively. At abstract submission 6 pts had breast surgery (pCR in 5 pts = 83.3%). Conclusions Our real-world data are consistent with the results of the KEYNOTE-522 trial in terms of patients characteristics. We observed a very high rate of hematological and immune related adverse events, frequently leading to dose reduction or discontinuation, underlying the need for a very close clinical management of those patients. Updated data including toxicity during the whole neoadjuvant sequence and pCR rate will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Delphine Loirat, Emilie ARNAUD, Khaoula ALAOUI, Pauline VAFLARD, Sinen KORBI, Dalila MEZIANI, Lucie THIBAULT, Romain-Pacome DESMARIS, Jean-Guillaume FERON, Jean-Yves Pierga, Francois-Clement Bidard, Paul COTTU. Real-world toxicity of pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant regimen in patients with early triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-09.

Abstract P4-01-20: Phase IV study evaluating talazoparib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic negative HER2 breast cancer and a somatic or germline BRCA1/2 mutation (ViTAL) – Analysis of cohort 1 according to hormonal receptor status

Abstract Background: Talazoparib (TALA) is a highly potent, dual-mechanism PARP inhibitor that has demonstrated clinical benefit in EMBRACA Phase III trial for patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutated locally advanced or metastatic HER2- breast cancer. Objective: The aim of the study is to ensure the effectiveness and safety of TALA in real-life setting among patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2- breast cancer, with somatic or germline BRCA1/2 mutation. Methods: ViTAL is an ambispective, multicentric, longitudinal, phase IV study. It includes two ambispective cohorts: - Cohort 1: patients treated through the French Early Access Program and inclusion of patients with somatic BRCA1/2 mutation was allowed. - Cohort 2: patients treated according to the European Marketing Approval granted in 09/21/2021. Here we present the results of the primary and some secondary endpoints for cohort 1. Results: From November 2018 to May 2021, 86 patients were included in Cohort 1, with updated results after a median follow-up of 17.3 months (11.2 - 24.4). Patients’ characteristics are 53.5% of ER+ BC/46.5% of TNBC (refer to the table). The median Time to Treatment Discontinuation (mTTD) was 9.0 months [range 6.0; 11.5] with 37.7% of patients still on treatment at 12 months. Subgroup analysis shows similar mTTD according HR status, germline vs somatic mutation and prior platinum exposure (refer to the table). The Clinical Benefit Rate assessed by the investigators is 82.4% (Complete Response for 25.7%, Partial response R for 32.4% and stable disease for 24.3%). The median of duration of CNS metastases control was 6.6 months, and 80.0% of patients had control of CNS metastases during TALA. Out of the 85 treated patients, 69 patients (80,2%) experienced a TALA permanent discontinuation for progressive disease (84.1%), toxicity (10.1%), cancer-related death (1.4%), or other reasons (1.4%). After discontinuation of TALA, 65.1% of patients received a subsequent treatment with a TTD of 2.3 months [1.7; 2.7]. The most common subsequent treatments were non-platinum chemotherapy (64.3%), platinum chemotherapy (19.6%) and others (19.1%). At least one adverse events (AEs) was recorded in 74.4% of patients. Hematologic AEs (any grade) occurred in 48.8% (anemia 27.9%, thrombocytopenia 12.8%, neutropenia 10.5%). Most common non-hematologic AEs were alopecia (8.1%) and asthenia (7.0%). Related Serious Hematologic AEs occurred in 10 patients (11.6%) including 7 (8.1%) Anemia. Related Serious Non-hematologic AEs (vomiting, pyelonephritis and ascitis) were seen in 3 patients (3.6%). AEs associated with temporary drug interruption, dose modification and permanent drug discontinuation occurred in 36 (41.9%), 24 (27.9%), and 7 (10.1%) patients respectively. The mOS is expected to be reached at the time of the congress, with 51.9% of patients still alive at 24 months. Conclusions: ViTAL is the largest study that reports real-word data with TALA. Outcomes and safety in Cohort 1 are consistent with the results of EMBRACA study and give additional data on subgroups of interest (ie patients previously treated with carboplatin, presence of CNS). (Litton et al. NEJM 2018) mTTD on subgroups of interest Patients’ characteristics Citation Format: Delphine Loirat, Marie Duboys de la barre, Jean-Christophe Thery, Ioana Hrab, Christelle Jouannaud, Jean-Loup Mouysset, Laura Salabert, Pauline Soibinet, Audrey Mailliez, Romain Valery, Anne Creisson, Cristian Villanueva, Nadine Dohollou, Jean-david Fumet, Thomas grellety, Nathalie Perez-staub, Emma Lachaier, Aurore Iltis-roux, Miguel delbado, Abeer Najem, Romuald Le Scodan, Elsa Curtit, kais aldabbagh, Pascal Pujol, thibault DE LA MOTTE ROUGE. Phase IV study evaluating talazoparib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic negative HER2 breast cancer and a somatic or germline BRCA1/2 mutation (ViTAL) – Analysis of cohort 1 according to hormonal receptor status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-20.

Abstract P4-01-04: Phase IV multicenter study evaluating RWE and the safety of talazoparib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic negative HER2 breast cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (ViTAL) - Cohort 2: patients treated according to the EMA

Abstract Background: Talazoparib (TALA) is a highly potent, dual-mechanism PARP inhibitor that has demonstrated clinical benefit in EMBRACA Phase III trial for patients with germline BRCA1/2 (BRCA1/2)-mutated locally advanced or metastatic HER2- breast cancer. Objective: The aim of the study is to ensure the effectiveness and safety of TALA in the real-world setting among patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2- breast cancer, with somatic or germline BRCA1/2 mutation. Methods: ViTAL is an ambispective, multicentric, longitudinal, phase IV study. It includes two ambispective cohorts: - Cohort 1: patients treated through the French Early Access Program and inclusion of patients with somatic BRCA1/2 mutation was allowed. - Cohort 2: patients treated according to the European Marketing Approval granted in 09/21/2021. The primary endpoint of the study is the Time to Treatment Discontinuation (TTD) which is defined as time between the date of first dose of TALA and the date of last dose or death. Results: From November 2018 to May 2021, 85 patients were included in Cohort 2, Patients’ characteristics are: - a median age of 49.0 years; - 65.8% ER+ BC/34.2% TNBC; - 42.1% mBRCA1/55.3 % mBRCA2/2,6% mBRCA1 and mBRCA2. - 85.7% ECOG PS 0 or 1; - 23.4% de novo mBC. - Visceral, bones and CNS metastases were found in 59.0%, 61.5% and 10.3% of patients respectively. - No breast or ovarian cancer family history at 1st degree was found in 39 patients (50.0%). - 38.5% were chemo-naïve; - 21.8% received prior platinum in (neo)adjuvant or metastatic setting, with a median of prior cytotoxic regimen of 1 - For patients with ER+/HER2- ABC the median number of prior endocrine therapy was 1 and 62.0% of these patients received a CDK4/6 inhibitor prior to TALA. - 8 patients (10.3%) had CNS metastases. Out of the 78 treated patients, 57 patients (73.0%) experienced a TALA permanent discontinuation for Progressive disease (80.7%), toxicity (12.3%), cancer-related death (1.8%), or other reasons (1.8%). The median TTD for TALA is 9.6 months [6.7;10.8] with 34.5% of patients still on treatment at 12 months. After discontinuation of TALA, 59.0% of patients received a subsequent treatment with a TTD of 3.9 months [2.1; 45]. The most common subsequent treatments were non-platinum chemotherapy (67.4%), platinum therapy (6.5%) and other (26.1%). The Clinical Benefit Rate assessed by the investigators is 87.6% (Complete Response for 14.1%, Partial Response for 56.3% and Stable Disease for 17.2%). The median duration of CNS metastases control was 10.2 months, and 25.0% of patients had a control of CNS metastases. At least one adverse events (AEs) was recorded in 67.9% of patients. Hematologic adverse events (AEs) (any grade) occurred in 55.1% (anemia 37.2%, thrombocytopenia 16.7%, neutropenia 15.4%). Most common non-hematologic AEs were Nausea (15.4%) and asthenia (15.4%). Related Serious Hematologic AEs occurred in 6 patients (7.7%) including 3 (3.8%) thrombocytopenia and 3 (3.8%) anemia. Related Serious Non-hematologic AEs (metrorrhagia) were seen in 1 patient (1.3%). AEs associated with temporary drug interruption, dose modification and permanent drug discontinuation occurred in 26 (33.3%), 22 (28.2%), and 7 (12.3%) patients respectively. The mOS is not mature for this analysis. Conclusions: ViTAL is the largest study that reports real-word data with TALA. Outcomes and safety in Cohort 2 (patients treated with TALA according to the European Marketing Approval), are consistent with the results of EMBRACA study and with the Cohort 1. (Litton et al. NEJM 2018) Citation Format: Delphine Loirat, Marie Duboys de la barre, Cristian Villanueva, Audrey Mailliez, Nicolas Isambert, Lionel Moreau, Emmanuelle Jacquet, Dominique Spaëth, Anne Creisson, Christelle Jouannaud, Eric Legouffe, Miguel delbado, Laura Deiana, Pauline Soibinet, Ioana Hrab, Thomas grellety, Nadine Dohollou, Raffaele Longo, Jean-Christophe Thery, Jean-david Fumet, Sellam Zineb, Pascal Pujol, thibault DE LA MOTTE ROUGE. Phase IV multicenter study evaluating RWE and the safety of talazoparib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic negative HER2 breast cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (ViTAL) - Cohort 2: patients treated according to the EMA [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-04.

Alpelisib and fulvestrant in PIK3CA-mutated hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer included in the French early access program.

SOLAR-1 and BYLieve trials documented the efficacy of the PI3K-inhibitor alpelisib in pre-treated PIK3CA-mutant, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients. We report here real-life datda of patients prospectively registered in the French alpelisib early access program (EAP) opened to PIK3CA-mutant HR+/HER2- ABC patients treated with alpelisib and fulvestrant. Primary endpoint was PFS by local investigators using RECIST1.1. Eleven centers provided individual data on 233 consecutive patients. Patients had received a median number of 4 (range: 1-16) prior systemic treatments for ABC, including CDK4/6 inhibitor, chemotherapy, fulvestrant and everolimus in 227 (97.4%), 180 (77.3%), 175 (75.1%) and 131 (56.2%) patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 7.1 months and 168 events, median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI: 4.7-6.0). Among 186 evaluable patients, CBR at 6 months was 45.3% (95% CI: 37.8-52.8). In multivariable analysis, characteristics significantly associated with a shorter PFS were age < 60 years (HR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-2.1), >5 lines of prior treatments (HR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.0-2.0) and the C420R PI3KCA mutation (HR = 4.1, 95% CI = 1.3-13.6). N = 91 (39.1%) patients discontinued alpelisib due to adverse events. To our knowledge, this is the largest real-life assessment of alpelisib efficacy. Despite heavy pre-treatments, patients derived a clinically relevant benefit from alpelisib and fulvestrant.

Gilteritinib Activity in Refractory or Relapsed FLT3-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Previously Treated By Intensive Chemotherapy and Midostaurin: A Study from the French AML Intergroup ALFA/Filo

Background The recent phase 3 ADMIRAL trial has shown that outcomes of relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients were improved by the single-agent FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor gilteritinib as compared with salvage chemotherapy. In this trial, overall survival (OS) was significantly improved in the gilteritinib arm and complete remission (CR/CRi), after excluding those obtained after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) were 26.3% in the gilteritinib group. Methods Here, the real-world efficacy and safety of gilteritinib was assessed in an ambispective study that included 167 R/R FLT3-mutated AML patients (Cohort A) from the French early access program ELEGANCE between March 1st, 2019, and March 1st, 2021. Gilteritinib was administered to 27 patients in association with other treatments, while 140 received it as single agent (Cohort B), including 67 previously treated by intensive chemotherapy and midostaurin (Cohort C). Results Characteristics of the three cohorts at gilteritinib initiation are described in Table 1. Briefly, in the whole cohort A, there were 141 (84.4%) cases of de novo AML, FLT3 mutation was ITD in 104 (62.3%) and TKD in 33 (19.8%), whereas 36 (21.6%) patients were FLT3 wild-type at diagnosis, acquired mutation later in disease evolution and were FLT3 mutated at gilteritinib initiation. Finally, 6 (3.6%) patients had both FLT3-ITD and TKD mutations. The median FLT3-ITD/wt ratio was 0.50 (IQR, 0.12-0.70 and range 0.01-1.90), and the median size of ITD was 48 bp (IQR, 30-75, range 3-408). Most patients (136, 81.4%) had an intermediate cytogenetic risk, and 84 (50.3%) had an NPM1 co-mutation. The main differences in patient characteristics in this study, compared to ADMIRAL, were ECOG ≥ 2 (83.6% vs 16.6%), FLT3-TKD mutations (21.0% vs 8.5%), primary induction failure (15.0% vs 40.0%) and previous lines of treatment (beyond 2nd in 37.1% vs 0.0%). The rates of response to gilteritinib are described in Table 1. Moreover, CRc (CR + CR without hematological recovery + CR with incomplete platelet recovery) to gilteritinib as single agent in subgroups defined as per AML phase at gilteritinib initiation were 4.5% (N=22) for patients refractory after front-line, 37.5% (N=32) for those relapsing less than 6 months from CR/CRi, 26.7% (N=30) when relapse occurred after 6 months and 16.1% (N=56) for patients refractory after 1st relapse and beyond. Finally, 32 (19.2%), 25 (17.9%) and 15 (22.4%) patients received an Allo-HSCT after gilteritinib, in CRc for 21 (65.6%), 17 (68.0%) and 11 (73.3%) patients in cohorts A, B and C, respectively. In terms of safety, in the subgroup of patients treated with gilteritinib as single agent (Cohort B), 39 (28.3%) experienced a serious adverse event (SAE) during gilteritinib treatment: infection in 22 (56.4%), hemorrhage in 1 (2.6%), cardiovascular in 4 (10.3%), hepatic in 4 (10.3%), differentiation syndrome in 2 (5.2%) and other SAE in 6 (15.4%). In terms of health care resource consumption, the median duration of hospitalization during the first 6 months of treatment was 9.0 days (IQR 0-29, range 0-117) with a median of 7 RBC units (IQR 0-14, range 0-54) and of 5 platelet units (IQR 0-13.5, range 0-56) transfusions. After a median follow-up of 14.5 months, median OS and 12-month OS were 6.4 months (IQR, 3.2-14.7) and 31.4% (95%CI 22.4-39.7) in the 140 patients who received gilteritinib as single agent, and 7.8 months (IQR, 3.2-20.8) and 38.3% (95%CI 26.0-50.4) in the subgroup of 67 patients previously treated by intensive chemotherapy and midostaurin (Figure 1). Multivariate analyses disclosed female gender (HR 1.61, 95%CI 1.07-2.42, p=0.02), adverse cytogenetic risk (HR 2.52, 95%CI 1.24-5.13, p=0.01) and allo-HSCT after gilteritinib (HR 0.13, 95%CI 0.05-0.37, p<0.0001) as factors significantly and independently associated with OS. Conclusion Although patients in this study were more heavily pretreated, these real-world data reproduce ADMIRAL results and provide new insights in the outcome of patients previously treated by intensive chemotherapy and midostaurin and beyond the 2nd line of treatment. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Effectiveness and tolerance of Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of recalcitrant atopic dermatitis in a real-life French multicenter adult cohort

Effectiveness and tolerance of Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of recalcitrant atopic dermatitis in a real-life French multicenter adult cohort

Survival in adult patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive advanced melanoma: a noninterventional ambispective study of patients with cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib during the French early access program: MELANIS study.

Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib was available in France in 2015 through a 'Temporary Authorization for Use' program (TAU, preapproval access pending its marketing on 2016) for patients with v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1-mutant advanced melanoma. This study aimed to provide real-world outcomes in patients previously registered in this TAU. This noninterventional, ambispective, multicentre French study, conducted in patients previously registered in TAU, aimed to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and to describe the tolerability of the therapeutic combination. At first cobimetinib intake (in combination with vemurafenib), 88% of the 185 evaluable patients had disease stage IV (brain metastasis: 70% of them), 31% had elevated lactate dehydrogenases, and 10% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) index ≥2. Median OS was 16.1 months (95% CI, 12.5-20.7). Brain metastasis ( P < 0.001), ECOG index ≥2 ( P = 0.007), and hepatic impairment ( P = 0.037) were found as independent factors significantly associated with shorter survival. Median PFS was 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.2-8.4). ECOG index ≥2 ( P = 0.006) was significantly associated with shorter PFS. Between cobimetinib start and inclusion, increased CPK (3% of patients), retinal serous detachment (3%), decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (3%), increased transaminases (3%), and rash (3%) were the most reported serious adverse events. This study provides real-world outcomes in France for the vemurafenib-cobimetinib combination available in patients with BRAF-mutant-advanced melanoma. Our data tend to confirm in the real-life setting that this combination therapy is effective in such patients, with a safety profile consistent with previous interventional studies.

Can nivolumab alone cure patients with relapse or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma? A 5‐year analysis of the French early access program (EPA)

Can nivolumab alone cure patients with relapse or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma? A 5‐year analysis of the French early access program (EPA)