Free Precession Magnetic Resonance Angiography Research Articles

Reliability of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography-derived aortic diameters in Marfan patients: comparison of inner vs. outer vessel wall measurements

Aortic diameter measurements play a crucial role for the indication of aortic root surgery in Marfan patients. However, for magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)-derived measurements, there is no consensus on whether the aortic wall should be included or excluded in the aortic diameter. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the reliability of non-contrast bright blood MRA aortic inner-to-inner and outer-to-outer edge measurements in patients with Marfan syndrome. Forty Marfan patients underwent ECG-gated balanced steady-state free-precession MRA of the aorta at 1.5 T. Two readers independently performed inner and outer measurements at different aortic levels. They rated the image quality of the delineation of both inner and outer vessel wall edges on a four-point scale. MRA-derived diameters of the sinuses of Valsalva were compared with echocardiography-derived diameters. Aortic vessel wall delineation score was rated higher at all levels for inner than for outer vessel walls (p < 0.001). Inter- and intraobserver variances of aortic measurements were smaller for inner-to-inner measurements at the sinuses of Valsalva, sinotubular junction and ascending aorta (p < 0.03). There was a difference of 1.1 ± 2.3 mm for inner MRA measurements (p = 0.014) and 6.9 ± 3.1 mm for outer MRA measurements (p < 0.001) when compared to echocardiographic leading-edge measurements. Inner-to-inner vessel wall diameter measurements in non-contrast bright blood MRA provide more reliable diameters when compared to outer-to-outer vessel wall measurements of the aortic root. Therefore, we propose to rely on inner rather than outer aortic wall measurements in non-contrast-MRA when monitoring aortic diameters in patients with Marfan syndrome.

276Non contrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography: the more relevant magnetic resonance technique for the assessment prior to Ross procedure?

276Non contrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography: the more relevant magnetic resonance technique for the assessment prior to Ross procedure?

Can visual analogue scale be used in radiologic subjective image quality assessment?

BackgroundAssessment of qualitative or subjective image quality in radiology is traditionally performed using a fixed-point scale even though reproducibility has proved challenging.ObjectiveImage quality of 3-T coronary magnetic resonance (MR) angiography was evaluated using three scoring methods, hypothesizing that a continuous scoring scale like visual analogue scale would improve the assessment.Materials and methodsAdolescents corrected for transposition of the great arteries with arterial switch operation, ages 9–15 years (n=12), and healthy, age-matched controls (n=12), were examined with 3-D steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. Image quality of the coronary artery origin was evaluated by using a fixed-point scale (1–4), visual analogue scale of 10 cm and a visual analogue scale with reference points (figurative visual analogue scale). Satisfactory image quality was set to a fixed-point scale 3=visual analogue scale/figurative visual analogue scale 6.6 cm. Statistical analysis was performed using Cohen kappa coefficient and agreement index.ResultsThe mean interobserver scores for the fixed-point scale, visual analogue scale and figurative visual analogue scale were, respectively, in the left main stem 2.8, 5.7, 7.0; left anterior descending artery 2.8, 4.7, 6.6; circumflex artery 2.5, 4.5, 6.2, and right coronary artery 3.2, 6.3, 7.7. Scoring with a fixed-point scale gave an intraobserver κ of 0.52–0.77 while interobserver κ was lacking. For visual analogue scale and figurative visual analogue scale, intraobserver agreement indices were, respectively, 0.08–0.58 and 0.43–0.71 and interobserver agreement indices were up to 0.5 and 0.65, respectively.ConclusionQualitative image quality evaluation with coronary 3-D steady-state free precession MR angiography, using a visual analogue scale with reference points, had better reproducibility compared to a fixed-point scale and visual analogue scale. Image quality, being a continuum, may be better determined by this method.

Diagnostic Efficacy of Coronary Artery Three-Dimensional Steady-State Free Precession Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison with Invasive Coronary Angiography for Detecting Coronary Artery Disease.

To assess the diagnostic value of three-dimensional steady-state free precession magnetic resonance angiography (3D-SSFP MRA) for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients suspected of CAD based on clinical evaluation, underwent invasive coronary angiography (CAG) and Cardiac MRA (CMRA). Collected data in favor of any CAD findings in CMRA were compared to CAG results as the standard diagnostic method in CAD detection. Analysis was performed on per-patient, per-vessel and per-segment bases. A total of 30 patients (mean age: 43 ± 10 years, 19 men) were enrolled for analysis. On per-patient analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of CMRA for detection of coronary artery stenosis were 100% (CI95%: 75% - 100%), 50% (CI95%: 18% - 81%), 73.33% (CI95%: 46% - 90%), 100% (CI95%: 47% - 100%) and 0.827, respectively. On per-vessel analysis, CMRA had a sensitivity of 89.29% (CI95%: 71%-97%), specificity of 80.56% (CI95%: 63% - 91%), PPV of 78.13% (CI95%: 60% - 90%), NPV of 90.63% (CI95%: 74% - 98%) and area under ROC curve of 0.845. On per-segment analysis, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of CMRA for segmental stenosis detection were 77.78% (CI95%: 60% - 89%), 87% (CI95%: 81% - 92%), 62% (CI95%: 46% - 76%), and 93.89% (CI95%: 88% - 97%), respectively. Area under ROC curve was 0.835 on per-segment analysis. 3D SSFP CMRA provides a promising non-invasive diagnostic tool for assessing coronary artery disease.

Non-contrast enhanced navigator-gated balanced steady state free precession magnetic resonance angiography as a preferred magnetic resonance technique for assessment of the thoracic aorta

To compare the objective and subjective image quality of non-contrast three-dimensional (3D) navigator-gated balanced steady state free precession magnetic resonance angiography (NC-MRA) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) along the entire thoracic aorta. Fifty consecutive patients with thoracic aortic disease underwent NC-MRA and CE-MRA using a 1.5T MRI system. Vessel sharpness was assessed using signal intensity profiles at five predefined levels of the thoracic aorta. Two readers scored subjective quality. Manual diameter measurements of both readers were used for calculation of interobserver variation. NC-MRA resulted in significantly sharper delineation of the aortic root, ascending aorta, and distal descending aorta compared to CE-MRA. Sharpness was comparable at the level of the arch and proximal descending aorta. NC-MRA resulted in significantly better subjective image quality. Interobserver agreement for diameter measurements was excellent for both techniques. NC-MRA resulted in superior image quality for assessment of the thoracic aorta and in better vessel sharpness for assessment of the aortic root and ascending aorta, when compared to CE-MRA. NC-MRA can be considered the MRA technique of choice for the assessment of the thoracic aorta diameters in clinical practice.

Hemodynamic analysis of renal artery stenosis using computational fluid dynamics technology based on unenhanced steady-state free precession magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary results

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technology in analysis of renal artery stenosis (RAS) based on unenhanced MR angiography (MRA). Thirty hypertensive patients with unilateral RAS, and 10 normal volunteers, underwent unenhanced MRA on a 1.5 T MR scanner. 12 of 30 patients also underwent ultrasound (US) to detect peak systolic velocity. The patient-specific CFD based on MRA was carried out thereafter. Stenosis grades and hemodynamic variables at the stenosis of main renal artery, including pressure difference (PD), velocity and mass flow rate (MFR), were analysed. And the hemodynamic indices of stenoses were compared with the parameters of normal renal arteries and available US velocity profile. High intraclass correlation coefficient (value 0.995) and no significant difference (p > 0.05) was shown between maximum velocity of CFD and peak systolic velocity of US in 12 patients. For normal renal arteries, the average PD, velocity and MFR were all in the reported normal physiological range. However, for stenotic arteries, the translesional PD and velocity of main renal arteries increased with the severity of stenotic degrees, while the MFR decreased. 50 % diameter stenosis was the threshold at which all three hemodynamic parameters experienced significant changes (p < 0.01). This preliminary study shows that unenhanced-MRA-based CFD can be utilized to noninvasively analyse hemodynamic parameters of RAS. The acquired variables may provide meaningful information regarding stratification of the stenosis and further therapeutic treatment.

Diagnostic Performance of a Non–Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for Potential Living Related Kidney Donors

The objective of the study was to evaluate the performance of a non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol for preoperative screening of living related kidney donors. Forty consecutive subjects (mean age 52.2 ± 11.3 years, range 29-73 years) underwent MR imaging with T2-weighted sequences (coronal and axial plane), with a non-contrast-enhanced respiratory-gated three-dimensional steady state free precession MR angiography (NCE-MRA) sequence and with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance MR angiography (CE-MRA) sequences in the arterial and venous phases. Two blinded readers independently assessed arterial and venous anatomy and potential kidney lesions. Results of non-contrast-enhanced images were compared to CE-MRA and in a subgroup of 21 subjects to surgery as standard of reference. Regarding arterial anatomy, NCE-MRA yielded sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100%, 89%, and 91% compared to CE-MRA. Three kidneys were found to have more accessory renal arteries at NCE-MRA than at CE-MRA. In the subgroup of 21 subjects, 1 surgically proven accessory artery was depicted with NCE-MRA but not with CE-MRA. Accuracy of T2-weighted images regarding accessory veins or variant venous course was 99%, with one missed circumaortic vein on T2-weighted images. Two simple cysts were missed on T2-weighted and NCE-MRA but not on CE-MRA images. A non-contrast-enhanced MR imaging protocol including NCE-MRA and T2-weighted images allows for the accurate screening of living related kidney donors and may serve as an alternative to CE-MRA.

Comparison of Nonenhanced MR Angiographic Subtraction Techniques for Infragenual Arteries at 1.5 T: A Preliminary Study

To evaluate diagnostic performance of three nonenhanced methods: variable-refocusing-flip angle (FA) fast spin-echo (SE)-based magnetic resonance (MR) angiography (variable FA MR) and constant-refocusing-FA fast SE-based MR angiography (constant-FA MR) and flow-sensitive dephasing (FSD)-prepared steady-state free precession MR angiography (FSD MR) for calf arteries, with dual-injection three-station contrast material-enhanced MR angiography (gadolinium-enhanced MR) as reference. This prospective study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant, with informed consent. Twenty-one patients (13 men, eight women; mean age, 62.6 years) underwent calf-station variable-FA MR, constant-FA MR, and FSD MR at 1.5 T, with gadolinium-enhanced MR as reference. Image quality and stenosis severity were assessed in 13 segments per leg by two radiologists blinded to clinical data. Combined constant-FA MR and FSD MR reading was also performed. Methods were compared (logistic regression for correlated data) for diagnostic accuracy. Of 546 arterial segments, 148 (27.1%) had a hemodynamically significant (≥ 50%) stenosis. Image quality was satisfactory for all nonenhanced MR sequences. FSD MR was significantly superior to both other sequences (P < .0001), with 5-cm smaller field of view; 9.6% variable-FA MR, 9.6% constant-FA MR, and 0% FSD MR segmental evaluations had nondiagnostic image quality scores, mainly from high diastolic flow (variable-FA MR) and motion artifact (constant-FA MR). Stenosis sensitivity and specificity were highest for FSD MR (80.3% and 81.7%, respectively), compared with those for constant-FA MR (72.3%, P = .086; and 81.8%, P = .96) and variable-FA MR (75.9%, P = .54; and 75.6%, P = .22). Combined constant-FA MR and FSD MR had superior sensitivity (81.8%) and specificity (88.3%) compared with constant-FA MR (P = .0076), variable-FA MR (P = .0044), and FSD MR (P = .0013). All sequences had an excellent negative predictive value (NPV): 93.2%, constant-FA MR; 94.7%, variable-FA MR; 91.7%, FSD MR; and 92.9%, combined constant-FA MR and FSD MR. At 1.5 T, all evaluated nonenhanced MR angiographic methods demonstrated satisfactory image quality and excellent NPV for hemodynamically significant stenosis. http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12120859/-/DC1.

ECG-gated Nonenhanced 3D Steady-State Free Precession MR Angiography in Assessment of Transplant Renal Arteries: Comparison with DSA

To evaluate noncontrast material-enhanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the assessment of transplant renal arteries (RAs) by using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard. This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board; written informed consent was obtained from all participants. In 20 renal allograft recipients scheduled for DSA, the transplant RAs were assessed with electrocardiographically gated nonenhanced SSFP MR angiography performed at 1.5 T; the degree of stenosis was compared with that of DSA. Subjective image quality for SSFP MR angiography was assessed independently by two radiologists on a four-point scale (from 1, nondiagnostic to 4, excellent) in four predefined segments (I, the iliac artery; II, the main transplant artery; III, segmental branches; and IV, parenchymal branches). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SSFP MR angiography for the detection of relevant (> or =50%) transplant RA stenosis (TRAS) were calculated on a per-artery basis. One patient was excluded because SSFP MR angiography failed to adequately visualize the allograft vasculature owing to low cardiac output. The mean image quality assessed by both readers was 3.98 +/- 0.16 (standard deviation), 3.5 +/- 0.68, 2.71 +/- 1.12 and 2.03 +/- 1.09 for segments I, II, III, and IV, respectively (kappa = 0.80). DSA helped identify eight relevant (> or =50%) stenoses in six transplant RAs. Kinking of the transplant artery without relevant stenosis was found in seven patients. The degree of stenosis was overestimated in three patients by using SSFP MR angiography. As compared with DSA, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SSFP MR angiography to help detect relevant TRAS were 100% (six of six), 88% (14 of 16), and 91% (20 of 22), respectively. Nonenhanced SSFP MR angiography is a reliable alternative imaging technique for the assessment of transplant RAs in patients for whom contrast-enhanced MR angiography is contraindicated.

Three-Dimensional Imaging of Pulmonary Veins by a Novel Steady-State Free-Precession Magnetic Resonance Angiography Technique Without the Use of Intravenous Contrast Agent

To evaluate the feasibility of 3-dimensional (3D) steady-state free-precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using nonselective radiofrequency excitation for imaging of pulmonary veins (PVs) without intravenous gadolinium chelate and to correlate the results with conventional contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA). Forty consecutive patients with history of atrial fibrillation underwent free-breathing respiratory navigator-gated electrocardiogram-triggered SSFP MRA without contrast administration and conventional high-resolution 3D CE-MRA of the thorax at 1.5 T. Two readers assessed both datasets for vascular definition (from 0, not visualized, to 3, excellent definition), artifacts, and ostial diameters. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon, paired t test, and kappa coefficient. On SSFP MRA, readers 1 and 2 graded 96.4% (160/166) and 97% (161/166) of the segments as having diagnostic visibility and sharpness, respectively (k = 0.82). On CE-MRA datasets, all segments were graded as having diagnostic visibility and sharpness by both readers (k = 0.86). No significant difference existed for visibility and sharpness of pulmonary venous segments between the datasets for each reader (P[r] > 0.05). Reader 1 (2) identified 27 (28) and 35 (32) motion artifacts on SSFP and CE-MRA datasets, respectively. No significant difference was found to exist between ostial diameters on CE-MRA and SSFP datasets (P > 0.05). Our study shows that 3D depiction of PVs without intravenous contrast is feasible with nonslice-selective SSFP MRA. This novel MRA technique may be used in certain patients with atrial fibrillation to assess the number and size of PV ostia draining to the left atrium prior to radiofrequency ablation.

Pulmonary Vein Imaging with Unenhanced Three-dimensional Balanced Steady-State Free Precession MR Angiography: Initial Clinical Evaluation

To determine whether unenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography performed with a three-dimensional (3D) segmented steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence would be an alternative to contrast material-enhanced MR angiography for evaluating pulmonary veins (PVs) prior to and following radiofrequency (RF) ablation for atrial fibrillation. MR angiographic examinations of PVs, performed in 20 patients (nine men, 11 women; mean age, 56.4 years +/- 12.7 [standard deviation]), were retrospectively reviewed according to an institutional review board-approved protocol. The number of PVs and their orthogonal measurements obtained from the 3D SSFP images were compared with those obtained from contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were also compared. Qualitative assessment of both techniques was performed by independent reviewers who scored the image quality (on a scale of 1 to 5) on the basis of PV conspicuity. The presence of cardiac and extracardiac pathologic indicators was also determined. Bland-Altman and Wilcoxon signed rank statistical analyses were performed. The mean difference in PV diameter measurements between contrast-enhanced MR angiography and 3D SSFP was -0.02 cm +/- 0.25. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were higher for 3D SSFP images than for contrast-enhanced MR angiograms. Qualitatively, there was no significant difference in PV conspicuity between the techniques. Noncardiac pathologic indicators were detected in 10 of 20 patients on 3D SSFP images but not on contrast-enhanced MR angiograms. Unenhanced PV MR angiography performed by using a free-breathing 3D SSFP technique is as accurate as contrast-enhanced MR angiography for measuring PV diameter. This technique can be used for patients in whom contrast-enhanced computed tomographic or MR angiography is contraindicated and may be sufficient in all patients.

Noncontrast 3D Steady-State Free-Precession Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Whole Chest Using Nonselective Radiofrequency Excitation over a Large Field of View: Comparison With Single-Phase 3D Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography

To evaluate the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) steady-state free-precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using nonselective radiofrequency excitation in the assessment of cardiac morphology, thoracic aorta, main pulmonary, and proximal coronary arteries. Thirty consecutive patients (19 males; 11 females; age range, 20-74) with various cardiac and thoracic vascular diseases underwent free-breathing respiratory navigator-gated electrocardiogram-triggered noncontrast SSFP MRA and conventional high-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) of the thorax at 1.5 T. Two readers evaluated both datasets for findings, vascular delineation and sharpness (from 0, not visualized to 3, excellent definition), artifacts, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in 14 vascular segments including aorta, supra-aortic, pulmonary, and coronary arteries, and in cardiac chambers. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test for vessel delineation, and [kappa] coefficient for interobserver variability. 3D SSFP and CE-MRA were successfully performed in all patients. Scan time for SSFP MRA ranged from 5 to 10 minutes (mean +/- standard deviation, 7 +/- 2 minutes). On SSFP MRA, readers 1 and 2 graded 233 (97.1%) and 234 (97.5%) coronary arterial segments and cardiac chambers, and 275 (91.7%) and 278 (92.7%) noncoronary arterial segments with diagnostic definition (grades 2 and 3) (k = 0.86). On conventional CE-MRA, readers 1 and 2 graded 10 (4.2%) and 12 (5%) coronary arterial segments and cardiac chambers, and 272 (90.7%) and 270 (90%) noncoronary arterial segments with diagnostic definition (grades 2 and 3) (k = 0.89). Segmental visibility was higher for aortic root, pulmonary trunk, proximal coronary arteries, and heart chambers (P < 0.001), and lower for supra-aortic arteries (P < 0.001) on SSFP MRA for each reader. SNR and CNR values were higher for aortic root and aorta on SSFP MRA (P < 0.001 for both). No significant difference existed between SNR and CNR values for the other vascular segments and cardiac chambers on SSFP and CE-MRA (P > 0.05 for all). The 2 readers demonstrated vascular stenosis and dilatation/aneurysm in 7 and 35 segments on both datasets, respectively. Noncontrast 3D SSFP MRA with nonselective radiofrequency excitation provides high image quality and sufficient SNR and CNR for confident assessment of cardiac and thoracic vascular diseases including congenital heart diseases. Our results suggest that noncontrast SSFP MRA outperforms CE-MRA in visualization of cardiac chambers, proximal coronary arteries, pulmonary trunk, and aortic root.

Noncontrast 3D Steady State Free Precession Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Thoracic Central Veins Using Nonselective Radiofrequency Excitation Over a Large Field of View

To evaluate the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) steady state free precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using nonselective radiofrequency excitation for the assessment of thoracic central veins. Thirty consecutive patients (17 males, 13 females, age range 22-76) with various cardiac and thoracic vascular diseases underwent free-breathing electrocardiogram-gated noncontrast SSFP MRA and conventional high-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA of the thorax at 1.5 T. Two readers evaluated both datasets for findings: venous visibility and sharpness (from 0, not visualized to 3, excellent definition); artifacts; signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in 8 venous segments including superior vena cava (SVC), supra-diaphragmatic inferior vena cava, bilateral brachiocephalic, proximal subclavian, and lower internal jugular veins. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test for overall image quality and vessel visibility, t test for SNR and CNR analysis, and kappa coefficient for inter-observer variability. 3D SSFP and CE-MRA were successfully performed in all patients. Scan time for SSFP MRA ranged from 5 to 10 minutes (mean +/- standard deviation, 7 +/- 2 minutes). Reader 1 (2) graded the overall image quality as excellent and good on SSFP MRA in 23 (25) and 7 (5) patients, and on CE-MRA in 22 (23) and 8 (9) patients, respectively. On SSFP MRA, readers 1 and 2 graded 234 (97.5%) and 233 (97.1%) venous segments with diagnostic definition (grades 2 and 3) (kappa = 0.69), respectively. On conventional CE-MRA, readers 1 and 2 graded 231 (96.3%) and 232 (96.7%) venous segments with diagnostic definition (grades 2 and 3) (kappa = 0.68), respectively. Segmental visibility and sharpness were higher for lower internal jugular veins on CE-MRA for each reader (P < 0.001). No significant difference existed for venous visibility and sharpness scores for other venous segments between the 2 techniques for both readers (P > 0.05). SNR and CNR values were lower for internal jugular veins on SSFP MRA (P < 0.001). No significant difference existed between SNR and CNR values for the other venous segments on SSFP and CE-MRA (P > 0.05 for all). The 2 readers demonstrated patent SVC Glenn shunt to main pulmonary artery (n = 3), patent extra cardiac Fontan shunt from inferior vena cava to pulmonary artery confluence (n = 2), and dilatation and thrombosis of SVC (n = 1) and right brachiocephalic vein (n = 1) on both datasets. Free breathing navigator-gated noncontrast 3D SSFP MRA with nonselective radiofrequency excitation provides high image quality and sufficient SNR and CNR for confident evaluation of thoracic central veins.

Intraindividual Comparison of 3D Coronary MR Angiography and Coronary CT Angiography

To compare the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) with special regard to calcifications. Twenty-seven patients with known CAD were examined with a targeted, navigator-gated, free-breathing, steady-state free precession MR angiography sequence (repetition time = 5.6 milliseconds, echo time = 2.8 milliseconds, flip angle 110 degrees ) and 16-slice coronary CT angiography. Segment-based sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the detection of stenoses larger than 50% were determined as defined by the gold standard catheter coronary angiography along with the subjective image quality (Grade 1-4). The degree of calcifications in each segment was quantified using a standard calcium scoring tool. Of 115 possible segments, 7% had to be excluded in MR imaging because of poor image quality. In CT, 3% were nondiagnostic because of image quality and 15% were not evaluable because of calcifications. Values for the detection of relevant coronary artery stenoses in the evaluated segments were: sensitivity: MR imaging 85% versus CT 96%; specificity: 88% versus 96%; accuracy: 87% versus. 96%. Average subjective image quality was 1.8 for MR imaging and 1.6 for CT. Of the 15% of segments that had to be excluded from CT evaluation because of calcifications, MR imaging provided the correct diagnosis segments in 67%. CT provided a better image quality with superior accuracy for the detection of CAD. Despite its overall inferiority, MR imaging proved to be helpful method in interpreting coronary stenosis in severely calcified segments.

Combination of free‐breathing and breathhold steady‐state free precession magnetic resonance angiography for detection of coronary artery stenoses

To analyze the incremental diagnostic value of a combination of two approaches (free-breathing and breathhold) vs. the sole free-breathing approach to coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) for detection of significant stenoses. Thirty patients were consecutively included in this prospective trial. CMRA was performed on a 1.5-T MR scanner (Magnetom Sonata, Siemens) using a balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence during free-breathing (2.4 x 0.9 x 0.7 mm3). Breathholding acquisitions (3.0 x 1.5 x 0.7 mm3) were only performed in cases in which the quality of free-breathing CMRA precluded assessment. Patients with contraindications to CMRA, claustrophobia, or nonassessable images were not excluded from the assessment of diagnostic accuracy (intention-to-diagnose design). In 60% of all free-breathing coronary acquisitions the image quality was adequate for diagnostic assessment. For the remaining 40% of the cases, breathhold acquisitions were obtained. The sensitivity, specificity, nonassessable rate, and accuracy in identifying main coronary branches with significant stenoses using the combination of both breathing approaches and the free-breathing approach alone were 65% vs. 32%, 73% vs. 53%, 24% vs. 52%, and 71% vs. 46%, respectively (P < 0.001). In this consecutive cohort of patients, the combination of free-breathing and breathhold CMRA significantly improved diagnostic accuracy. Nevertheless, even this combination did not reach accuracies sufficient for routine clinical application.

Renal Arteries: Comparison of Steady-State Free Precession MR Angiography and Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography

All participants provided informed consent to participate in this study, which was approved by the institutional review board. Breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) steady-state free precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography was compared with 3D contrast material-enhanced MR angiography in patients suspected of having renal artery stenosis. Two radiologists assessed visualization of renal arteries and detection of vascular disease. With SSFP MR angiography, 39 of 41 renal arteries in 19 patients were correctly detected. Relevant stenoses were correctly identified with SSFP MR angiography in two patients. In two patients, SSFP MR angiographic data sets led to false-positive overgrading of vascular disease. Fast breath-hold 3D SSFP MR angiography appears to be feasible for MR angiography of renal arteries.