Free-hand Pedicle Screw Placement Technique Research Articles

Sagittal orientation and uniform entry for thoracic pedicle screw placement with free-hand technique: A retrospective study on 382 pedicle screws

BackgroundOne of the most important factors in obtaining a successful outcome in spinal surgery is appropriate placement of the pedicle screw. A number of different techniques are used to achieve successful pedicle screw placement. The free-hand technique has the advantage of no requirement for radiation exposure, but its success is highly dependent on surgeon experience. Here, we describe our entry point and perioperative sagittal orientation method, and evaluate postoperative sagittal alignment of pedicle screws with the free-hand pedicle screw placement technique. Materials and methodsEighty-two patients undergoing spinal surgery between 2015 and 2016 were included in this study. Pedicle screw placement was evaluated retrospectively on postoperative anterior-posterior (A-P) and lateral load-bearing radiographs of the entire spinal column. The vertebral body was divided into five areas in the lateral plane. Sagittal orientation of the pedicle screws on lateral radiographs was evaluated by two spine surgeons with 3 years of experience and one radiologist experienced in musculoskeletal radiology, with each observer evaluating the image twice according to a 1-month interval. ResultsA total of 382 pedicle screws were evaluated. There was no statistically significant difference between the first and second measurements, performed by individual observers, and there was good concordance among the three observers. ConclusionsUse of a uniform entry point at all levels may increase the effectiveness of the free-hand technique and decrease the pedicle screw misplacement rate. Our technique may standardize the free-hand technique, which does not require radiation exposure, and make it more practical to apply uniformly.

Pedicle screw placement accuracy impact and comparison between grading systems.

Background:Pedicle screw instrumentation is widely used for spinal stabilization. However, the accuracy for free-hand screw placement ranges from 69% to 94%. This study assesses the value of the existing classification systems, and investigates their impact on the ability to assess the accuracy of free-hand screw placement.Methods:Data were collected retrospectively from the medical records of 34 patients who received 224 pedicle screws placed utilizing a free-hand technique. Screw placement was evaluated employing the 2-mm increment and Zdichavsky et al. classification systems. Kappa coefficient and Landis and Koch interpretations were employed for statistical analysis.Results:The 2-mm increment classification system resulted in a total of 18 (8.03%) misplaced screws. Lateral screw misplacement was observed in 13 (5.8%) instances, with medial pedicle wall penetration being noted in 5 (2.23%). Of the 18 misplaced screws, 4 (22.22%) were classified as minor (≤2 mm), 12 (66.67%) as moderate (2–4 mm), and 2 (11.11%) as severe (>4 mm) (K = 0.882). The Zdichavsky et al. grading system categorized 208 (92.84%) pedicle screws as Ia, 10 (4.46%) as Ib, 1 (0.45%) as IIa, 2 (0.90%) as IIb, 2 (0.90%) as IIIa, and 1 (0.45%) as IIIb grade; this resulted in a total of 16 (7.14%) misplaced screws (K = 0.980). One patient exhibited a new postoperative radiculopathy attributed to poor screw placement. There were no additional early or late postsurgical complications attributed to screw misplacement.Conclusion:The free-hand pedicle screw placement technique is both safe and effective. Postoperative computed tomography studies; however, are useful to confirm the accuracy of screw placement. Although, the available grading systems proved reliable, easy to use, and clearly reflected the individual surgeon's skills, they do not clearly document whether screws are safely placed.

A new free-hand pedicle screw placement technique with reference to the supraspinal ligament

We sought to compare the safety and accuracy of a new free-hand pedicle screw placement technique to that of the conventional technique. One hundred fifty-three consecutive adult patients with simple fracture in the thoracic or/and lumbar spine were alternately assigned to either the new free-hand or the conventional group. In the new free-hand technique group, preoperative computerized tomography (CT) images were used to calculate the targeted medial-lateral angle of each pedicle trajectory and the pedicle screw was inserted perpendicular to the correspond-ing supraspinal ligament. In the conventional technique group, the medial-lateral and cranial-caudal angle of each pedicle trajectory was determined by intraoperatively under fluoroscopic guidance. The accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement, the time of intraoperative fluoroscopy, the operating time and the amount of blood loss during operation were respectively compared. All screws were analyzed by using intraoperative radiographs, intraoperative triggered electromyography (EMG) monitoring data, postoperative CT data and clinical outcomes. The accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement in the new free-hand technique group and the conventional technique group was 96.3% and 94.2% (P < 0.05), respectively. The intraoperative fluoroscopy time of the new technique group was less than that of the conventional technique group (5.37 seconds vs. 8.79 seconds, P < 0.05). However, there was no statistical difference in the operating time and the amount of blood loss during operation (P > 0.05). Pedicle screw placement with the free-hand technique which keeps the screw perpendicular to the supraspinal ligament is an accurate, reliable and safe technique to treat simple fracture in the thoracic or lumbar spine.

Computed Tomography Evaluation of Pedicle Screws Placed in the Pediatric Deformed Spine Over an 8-Year Period

A retrospective review. To evaluate the incremental accuracy of pedicle screws used in spinal deformity via a free-hand technique at a single institution over an 8-year period. The in vivo accuracy of free-hand pedicle screws placed throughout the deformed spine as evaluated by computed tomography (CT) scanning is unknown over a long time period. A total of 1023 pedicle screws inserted from T1 to L4 in 60 patients (928 screws in 54 scoliosis patients and 95 screws in 6 kyphosis patients) over an 8-year period were investigated via postoperative CT scans. Patients were divided into 3 groups (group I = 1998-1999, group II = 2001-2002, and group III = 2005). All pedicle screws were inserted via the free-hand technique using anatomic landmarks, specific entry sites, neurophysiologic, and radiographic confirmation. Pedicle screw position on CT scan was graded as acceptable versus violated, defined as the screw axis being outside the pedicle wall. One hundred seven of 1023 pedicle screws (10.5%) demonstrated significant mediolateral pedicle wall violations (19 medial vs. 88 lateral, P = 0.001). groups I and III had significantly higher lateral wall violations than group II (P < 0.05) as did the kyphotic spines (vs. scoliotic spine, P < 0.05). There were significantly more screws placed in the periapical region over time (P < 0.0001), with left-sided lateral violations (T5-T8) increasing from group II to group III, while the number of medial violations significantly decreased with time (P < 0.0001). Pedicle screws placed on the right side showed a significant decrease in accuracy from group II to group III (P = 0.03). The average transverse angle of the acceptable screws was 15.3 degrees which was significantly different from the medial (23.0 degrees , P < 0.001) and lateral (10.6 degrees , P < 0.001) violations between group I and group II. No screws demonstrated neurologic, vascular, or visceral complications. Overall accuracy of acceptable screws using the free-hand pedicle screw placement technique in the deformed spine was 89.5%, without any neurologic, vascular, or visceral complications over an 8-year period. The rate of medial violations decreased with time, as the number of screws placed in the periapical region increased.

Safety and efficacy of pedicle screw placement for adult spinal deformity with a pedicle-probing conventional anatomic technique.

A prospective study of 50 adults treated with fusion, realignment, and segmental spinal instrumentation for spinal deformity was conducted to assess the safety, accuracy, and efficacy of the free-hand pedicle screw placement technique. Postoperative computed tomographic scans were performed to evaluate the placement of 282 screws and were correlated with patients' clinical outcomes. Five screws were placed at T12, 26 at L1, 39 at L2, 48 at L3, 73 at L4, 35 at L5, and 50 at S1. Nine screws (3%) were misplaced and included three screws (1.06%) that violated the medial wall with no clinical sequelae or revision surgery needed. There were no neurologic deficits related to screw placement. The free-hand technique is a safe and cost-effective method for pedicular screw placement during surgery for adult spine deformities.