Free Flap Outcomes Research Articles

Clinical Outcomes of Scapular versus Fibular free flaps in Head and Neck Reconstructions: A Retrospective Study of 120 patients".

The scapular free flap has increasingly gained popularity as an alternative to the fibular free flap in osseous head and neck reconstruction. The present study aimed to evaluate their use in maxillomandibular reconstructions and examine surgical and patient outcomes. Osseous head and neck defects reconstructed with an angular artery-based scapular flap or fibular flap from 2016 to 2022 at two Swedish University Hospitals were evaluated for their intraoperative execution (osseous and soft tissue combinations) and postoperative outcomes. Facial quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the FACEQ Head and Neck Cancer Module. Donor-site morbidity was assessed using the DASH and SEFAS questionnaires for scapular- and fibular-reconstructed patients, respectively. A total of 120 patients were recruited: 86 mandibular reconstructions (26 scapulas, 60 fibulas) and 34 maxillary reconstructions (32 scapulas, 2 fibulas). The concave scapula facilitated fewer osteotomies for curved reconstructions, particularly for lateral mandibular defects (p=0.039). Intraoral lining was primarily achieved with muscle accompanying the scapula and skin accompanying the fibula. Using the latissimus dorsi muscle instead of only teres major decreased fistulas, plate/bone exposure and non-unions (p=0.039) in scapular reconstructions. Both flaps demonstrated comparable facial QoL, but the scapula presented superior donor site outcomes (p=0.001). Donor limb outcomes were unaffected by harvesting the latissimus dorsi with the scapula (p=0.64), and by re-suturing the detached muscles to the remaining scapula. (p=0.35). The scapular free flap can be advantageous in osseous head and neck reconstructions, enabling non-osteotomized and chimeric reconstructions without compromising surgical outcomes or quality of life.

Comparing the Outcomes of Osteocutaneous Radial Forearm and Fibula Free Flaps in the Reconstruction of Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis.

This study compares the outcomes of osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OC-RFFF) and fibula free flap (FFF) reconstruction of mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN). Retrospective review of patients undergoing OC-RFFF/FFF reconstruction for mandible ORN between 2005 and 2020 at a tertiary center. Patient characteristics, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes were evaluated using chi-squared and logistic regression analysis. Fifty-six patients were included (OC-RFFF: 38; FFF: 18). Significantly more OC-RFFF patients had lateral mandible defects (94% vs. 61%, p = 0.0014). There were significantly more patients with exposed intraoral bone in the OC-RFFF group (23% vs. 0% p = 0.02), but no significant differences in hardware complications or flap failure. Donor site partial skin graft loss was more common in the FFF group (22% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.016), but no other significant differences in donor site morbidity were seen. Bivariable analysis showed no impact of flap type, tobacco/alcohol use, diabetes, or hypothyroidism on postoperative complications. Sixty percent of OC-RFFF, and 67% of FFF, patients resumed an oral diet after surgery. Oral diet was not impacted by flap type (OR = 0.769, 95% CI = 0.201-2.706, p = 0.688). The OC-RFFF is an acceptable option in the reconstruction of ORN involving the lateral mandible, though there is increased risk of bone exposure. These findings can help guide surgeon selection of microvascular free flap donor sites and appropriate patient counseling.

The Influence of Vasopressors on Free Flap Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

To compare free flap outcomes between those who received and did not receive vasopressors (VPs) at the time of free flap reconstruction. This retrospective cohort study includes patients from January 2013 to January 2023. This multicenter cohort study utilized data from the TriNetX Research Network which includes 80 health care organizations. Head and neck cancer patients older than 18 years who underwent free flap reconstruction were separated into those who received or did not receive VPs on the day of surgery. The primary outcomes were flap failure defined by need for secondary free flap procedures, blood vessel repair, and other flap revision procedures. After propensity score matching, 7446 patients were analyzed. The VP group included 3723 patients (mean age [SD], 62.9 [11.4] years; 2511 males [67.4%]). The non-VP group included 3723 patients (mean age [SD], 63.0 [11.2] years; 2479 males [66.6%]). Free flap outcomes were not statistically different between groups (secondary free flap: 166 [4.5%] VP vs 155 [4.2%] non-VP, P = .04; vessel repair: 314 [8.4%] vs 319 [8.6%], P = .06; other flap revision procedures: 416 [11.2%] vs 449 [12.1%], P = .02). Bony flaps were found to have decreased rates of vessel repair in the VP group (47 [6.1%] vs 69 [9.0%], P = .003]. For secondary outcomes, pneumonia (173 [4.6%] vs 231 [6.2%], P = .0002), urinary tract infection (34 [1.0%] vs 59 [1.6%], P = .0007), and deep vein thrombosis (93 [2.5%] vs 122 [3.3%], P = .004) were significantly different. VP use is not significantly associated with free flap complications. These results imply that VP use on the same day as surgery may be safe if clinically necessary.

A single-center retrospective comparison of muscle versus cutaneous free flaps for posterior elbow defect reconstruction

IntroductionComparative data regarding free flap outcomes for elbow defect reconstruction is still lacking. This study aims to compare complication rates of free muscle (MFs) versus cutaneous flaps (CFs) for posterior elbow reconstruction. MethodsIn a single-center retrospective analysis, patients with free MFs and CFs for posterior elbow reconstruction from 2000 until 2021 were analyzed. Retrospective chart review included patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative complications. Compared outcomes of interest were microvascular complications, partial or total flap necroses, wound dehiscence, hematoma or flap infection, and donor-site complications. ResultsSixty-six free flaps (CFs: n=42; MFs: n=24) were included, with a trend over time towards using CFs (64%). MFs were used for larger defects (CF: 175 ± 82 vs MF: 212 ± 146 cm2; p=0.13). Outcome analysis revealed an equal distribution of microvascular complications (10% vs 13%; p=0.7), partial flap necrosis (7% vs 8%; p>0.9), wound dehiscence (7% vs 4%; p>0.9), evacuation of hematoma (10% vs 4%; p = 0.7), and infection (0% vs 4%; p = 0.4). Total flap necrosis requiring additional flap surgery was necessary in one CF (2%) and in no MF (0%) (p>0.9). ConclusionSurgical outcomes, flap necrosis rates, and microsurgical complications did not differ between CFs and MFs. Both flap types are safe and effective options. The free anterolateral thigh and latissimus dorsi flaps represent indispensable workhorses for the reconstruction of extensive elbow defects.

Management of large head and neck defects in the vessel-depleted neck.

Surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy are often utilized in the treatment of head and neck cancer. These treatments can cause extensive scarring within the neck and can limit the viability of recipient vessels for further microvascular reconstruction. Patients with vessel-depleted necks provide a significant challenge for microvascular surgeons and are a topic of much discussion in the field. While reconstruction in the vessel-depleted neck is an active area of interest, the patient population is rare. Therefore, single institution series with small numbers comprise the majority of published literature. Recent publications describe techniques for identifying adequate recipient vessel options outside of the field of treatment with excellent free flap outcomes. Further, recent summary articles describe techniques for addressing issues with pedicle length that can arise when using vessels that are far from the defect to be reconstructed. When viable vessel options are available within the treatment field, these recipient vessels can be used with good reliability and free flap success. If in-field recipient vessels are not available, minimal access incisions can be used to identify superficial temporal, angular, contralateral facial, or transverse cervical vessels. Further away from the treatment field, internal mammary vessels can be harvested through open or robotic approaches. If the use of these distant vessels creates issues with pedicle length, interposition vein grafts, arteriovenous (AV) loops, or flow-through flaps can be used to augment vessel length.

Beyond the Scalpel: Physiological factors influencing free flap outcomes in head and neck reconstruction – A prospective study

Beyond the Scalpel: Physiological factors influencing free flap outcomes in head and neck reconstruction – A prospective study

D153. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Placement on Free Flap Outcomes in Delayed-immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction

D153. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Placement on Free Flap Outcomes in Delayed-immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Clinical outcomes of perforator-based propeller flaps versus free flaps in soft tissue reconstruction for lower leg and foot trauma: a retrospective single-centre comparative study.

The efficacy and safety of perforator-based propeller flaps (PPF) versus free flaps (FF) in traumatic lower leg and foot reconstructions are debated. PPFs are perceived as simpler due to advantages like avoiding microsurgery, but concerns about complications, such as flap congestion and necrosis, persist. This study aimed to compare outcomes of PPF and FF in trauma-related distal lower extremity soft tissue reconstruction. We retrospectively studied 38 flaps in 33 patients who underwent lower leg and foot soft tissue reconstruction due to trauma at our hospital from 2015 until 2022. Flap-related outcomes and complications were compared between the PPF group (18 flaps in 15 patients) and the FF group (20 flaps in 18 patients). These included complete and partial flap necrosis, venous congestion, delayed osteomyelitis, and the coverage failure rate, defined as the need for secondary flaps due to flap necrosis. The coverage failure rate was 22% in the PPF group and 5% in the FF group, with complete necrosis observed in 11% of the PPF group and 5% of the FF group, and partial necrosis in 39% of the PPF group and 10% of the FF group, indicating no significant difference between the two groups. However, venous congestion was significantly higher in 72% of the PPF group compared to 10% of the FF group. Four PPFs and one FF required FF reconstruction due to implant/fracture exposure from necrosis. Additionally, four PPFs developed delayed osteomyelitis post-healing, requiring reconstruction using free vascularized bone graft in three out of four cases. Flap necrosis in traumatic lower-leg defects can lead to reconstructive failure, exposing implants or fractures and potentially causing catastrophic outcomes like osteomyelitis, jeopardizing limb salvage. Surgeons should be cautious about deeming PPFs as straightforward and microsurgery-free procedures, given the increased complication rates compared to FFs in traumatic reconstruction. The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Propeller vs. free fasciocutaneous flap in reconstruction of complex lower limb defects–A prospective study

BackgroundOf all body regions, lower extremity wounds have been and remain the greatest challenge. Free flaps have been accepted as a reasonable option to solve this dilemma, but they require the complexity of microsurgery. This study aimed to compare the postoperative and clinical outcomes of propeller flap and fasciocutaneous free flap in the reconstruction of complex lower limb defects. Materials and methodsThis randomized controlled trial was conducted from July 2021 to June 2023. Selected patients were randomized into two groups: the propeller flap group and fasciocutaneous free flap group. Demographic data, preoperative parameters, and postoperative parameter, including esthetic analysis, scar assessment, neurosensory analysis, psychosocial analysis, and lower extremity function, were estimated and statistically significant compared between the two study groups. ResultsRoad traffic accident (73.3%) was the most common etiology for lower limb defects in both groups. The foot and lower third of the leg were the most common site of defect, constituting 79.99%. The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in propeller flap as compared to fasciocutaneous free flaps. Flap size was smaller, with better neurosensory improvements in propeller flap group. Esthetic analysis, scar assessment, psychosocial analysis, and lower extremity functional analysis yielded similar results in both study groups. ConclusionPropeller flap has better outcomes compared to free flap in terms of smaller size of flap, shorter duration of surgery, and reduced length of hospital stay. Comparable results were obtained with respect to esthetic score, scar assessment score, psychosocial analysis, and neurosensory recovery and lower extremity functional score.

Urethral Outcomes of the Labia Minora Ring Flap for Metoidioplasty and Phalloplasty

ObjectivesTo determine urethral outcomes of single-stage metoidioplasty and radial forearm free flap (RFFF) phalloplasty using the labia minora ring flap for urethral lengthening. MethodsA retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing single-stage metoidioplasty and RFFF phalloplasty utilizing the labia minora ring flap technique. The ring flap consists of endodermal labia minora tissue ventral to the clitoris and surrounding the vaginal introitus. During metoidioplasty, the ring flap accounts for the entirety of urethral lengthening. During RFFF phalloplasty, the ring flap becomes the pars fixa (PF) urethra. The primary outcomes measured were rates of fistula, stricture, and surgical revision. ResultsBetween November 2017 and August 2023, 311 patients underwent metoidioplasty or RFFF phalloplasty (mean follow-up 37 months). Of the 69 metoidioplasties, urethrocutaneous fistulas developed in 11 patients (16%); strictures occurred in 4 (6%). Of the 242 phalloplasty patients, there were 71 fistulas (29%), 56 of which resolved spontaneously. Strictures developed in 44 patients (18%). Twenty-five patients (10%) developed both a stricture and fistula. Surgical repair was required in 8/69 (12%) metoidioplasty patients and in 46/242 (19%) RFFF phalloplasty patients for an overall revision rate of 17%. ConclusionsUrethral lengthening during metoidioplasty or RFFF phalloplasty can be accomplished in a single stage using the labia minora ring flap with comparable surgical revision rates to previously described techniques. This approach can also be applied to other phalloplasty techniques. Many fistulas of the PF urethra resolve spontaneously. Higher urethral revision rates were seen in phalloplasty compared to metoidioplasty.

Socioeconomic Disparities in Postoperative Outcomes of Osteocutaneous Fibula Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Osteocutaneous fibula free flaps (FFFs) are a fundamental component of reconstructive surgery in the head and neck region, particularly after traumatic injuries or oncologic resections. Despite their utility, FFFs are associated with various postoperative complications, such as infection, flap failure, and donor site morbidity, impacting up to 54% of cases. This study aimed to investigate the influence of socioeconomic variables, with a particular focus on median household income (MHI), on the incidence of postoperative complications in FFF reconstruction for head and neck cancer. A retrospective analysis of 80 patients who underwent FFF reconstruction for head and neck cancer at a single center from 2016 to 2022 was conducted. Demographic and patient characteristics, including race, MHI, insurance type, history of radiation therapy, and TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) cancer stage, were evaluated. Logistic regression, controlling for comorbidities, was used to assess the impact of MHI on 30-, 90-, and 180-day postoperative complications. The patient population was predominantly male (n = 51, 63.8%) and White (n = 63, 78.8%), with the majority falling within the $55,000 to $100,000 range of MHI (n = 51, 63.8%). Nearly half of the patients had received neoadjuvant radiation treatment (n = 39, 48.75%), and 36.25% (n = 29) presented with osteoradionecrosis. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the $55,000-$100,000 MHI group had significantly lower odds of developing complications in the 0- to 30-day postoperative period when compared with those in the <$55,000 group (odds ratio [OR], 0.440; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.205-0.943; P = 0.035). This trend persisted in the 31- to 90-day period (OR, 0.136; 95% CI, 0.050-0.368; P < 0.001) and was also observed in the likelihood of flap takeback. In addition, the $100,000-$150,000 group had significantly lower odds of developing complications in the 31- to 90-day period (OR, 0.182; 95% CI, 0.035-0.940; P = 0.042). No significant difference was found in the >$150,000 group. Median household income is a significant determinant and potentially a more influential factor than neoadjuvant radiation in predicting postoperative complications after FFF reconstruction. Disparities in postoperative outcomes based on income highlight the need for substantial health care policy shifts and the development of targeted support strategies for patients with lower MHI.

Medial Femoral Condyle Free Flap: A Systematic Review and Proportional Meta-analysis of Applications and Surgical Outcomes

Background: Recalcitrant bone nonunion and osseous defect treatment is challenging and often requires vascularized bone transfer. The medial femoral condyle flap has become an increasingly popular option for reconstruction. The study aims at reviewing its different applications and synthesizing its surgical outcomes. Method: A systematic review including all studies assessing surgical outcomes of free medial femoral condyle flap for bone reconstruction in adults was conducted on January 31, 2023. Flap failure and postoperative complications were synthesized with a proportional meta-analysis. Results: Forty articles describing bony reconstruction in the head and neck, upper limb, and lower limb areas were selected. Indications ranged from bony nonunion and bone defects to avascular bone necrosis. Multiple flaps were raised as either pure periosteal, cortico-periosteal, cortico-cancellous-periosteal, or cortico-chondro-periosteal. A minority of composite flaps were reported. Overall failure rate was 1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.00–0.08] in head &amp; neck applications, 4% in the lower limb (95% CI, 0.00–0.16), 2% in the upper limb (95% CI, 0.00–0.06), and 1% in articles analyzing various locations simultaneously (95% CI, 0.00–0.04). Overall donor site complication rate was 4% (95% CI, 0.01–0.06). Major reported complications were: femoral fractures (n = 3), superficial femoral artery injury (n = 1), medial collateral ligament injury (n = 1), and septic shock due to pace-maker colonization (n = 1). Conclusion: The medial femoral condyle flap is a versatile option for bone reconstruction with high success rates and low donor site morbidity.

Sensory and pain outcomes of neurotized skin-grafted free gracilis muscle flaps for lower extremity reconstruction

BackgroundSkin-grafted free gracilis muscle flaps are commonly used for lower extremity reconstruction. However, the loss of sensory function may lead to increased patient morbidity. This study prospectively analyzed the sensory and neuropathic pain outcomes of neurotized skin-grafted free gracilis muscle flaps used for the reconstruction of lower extremity defects. MethodsPatients undergoing lower extremity reconstructions between 2020 and 2022 with neurotized skin-grafted free gracilis muscle flaps were prospectively enrolled. Sensation was assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively using monofilaments, two-point discrimination, a vibration device, and cold and warm metal rods. Sensations were tested in the center and periphery of the flaps, as well as in the surrounding skin. The contralateral side served as the control. Patients completed the McGill pain questionnaire to evaluate patient-reported neuropathic pain. ResultsTen patients were included. At 12 months postoperatively, monofilament values improved by 44.5% compared to that of the control site, two-point discrimination, cold detection, warmth detection, and vibration detection improved by 36.2%, 48%, 50%, and 88.2%, respectively, at the reconstructed site compared to those at the control site. All sensory tests were significantly better than 3 and 6 months values (p < 0.05), but remained significantly poorer than the control site (p < 0.05). Sensation in the central flap areas were similar to peripheral flap areas throughout the follow-up period (p > 0.05). The surrounding skin reached values similar to the control site at 12 months (p > 0.05). Moreover, 50% of patients reported neuropathic pain at 3 months postoperatively, 40% at 6 months, and 0% at 12 months (p < 0.05). ConclusionMechanical detection, vibration detection, temperature detection, and two-point discrimination significantly improved over time but without reaching normal sensory function at 12 months postoperatively. Neuropathic pain resolved at 12 months.

The Hidden Risks of Perioperative Transfusions in Traumatic Lower Extremity Free Flap Reconstruction.

Blood transfusions have been associated with surgical complications; however, these studies are not specific to lower extremity (LE) reconstruction. We evaluated the effect of perioperative packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions on LE free flap outcomes in trauma patients. Patients undergoing LE free flap reconstruction following acute injuries from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The perioperative period for transfusions was defined as ± 3 days from the procedure. Parameters included demographics, perioperative characteristics, and outcomes. Major complications were complications requiring reoperation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify associations. Of the 205 patients, 48% received PRBCs perioperatively. There was a trend toward higher major complications rate in the transfusion group (19 vs. 10%, p = 0.09). Wound size, injury severity score (ISS), and intraoperative estimated blood loss were greater in the transfusion group (p < 0.01). Preoperative hemoglobin/hematocrit were lower in the transfusion group (p < 0.001). Units of PRBCs transfused were independently associated with major complications on multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.70, p = 0.015) and length of hospital stay (LOS; OR = 1.05, CI: 1.02-1.08, p = 0.002). Infection, wound size, ISS, and preoperative hemoglobin/hematocrit were independently associated with increased LOS (p < 0.05) but not with major complications. The number of units of PRBCs given perioperatively was the only variable independently associated with major complications on multivariate analysis and was one of many variables associated with increased LOS. These findings suggest the usage of restrictive transfusion protocols in trauma patients requiring LE reconstruction.

Comparisons of Impact of Vein Grafting with Different Indications on Outcomes of Reconstruction with Free Flaps.

Prior studies have shown an increased risk of complications and flap loss with the use of vein grafts in microsurgery. We hypothesize that indication for use of a vein graft can affect flap complications and loss rates. We performed a retrospective review of all patients at our institution from 2010 to 2020 who underwent free flap reconstruction and required use of a vein graft. Indications for vein grafting included: salvage of flap during primary operation after microvascular compromise, augmentation of flow during primary operation, lengthening of the flap pedicle during the primary operation, and salvage of the flap during a secondary salvage operation after microvascular compromise. A total of 79 patients met the study inclusion criteria. There were significant differences among the vein graft indication groups and the following: area of reconstruction (p = 0.002), vein graft length (p = 0.018), vessels grafted (p = 0.001), vein graft donor site (p = 0.011), and total flap loss (p = 0.047). Of the four indications for vein grafting, salvage of the flap during secondary salvage operation after microvascular compromise had the highest rate of total flap loss (26.7%). There were no significant associations between other flap complications and vein graft indications. Vein graft use in the primary reconstructive setting is efficacious, with low risk of thrombosis. Use in secondary procedures, however, is associated with higher rates of total flap loss, likely due to the thrombotic process, which was initiated prior to the use of the graft resulting in the salvage procedure and not secondary to the graft itself.

A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of oncological and functional outcomes of submental island flap versus radial forearm free flap for oral cavity cancer reconstruction

BackgroundThis retrospective study aims to compare the oncological and functional outcomes of the submental island flap versus the radial forearm free flap used for oral cavity cancer reconstruction after minimizing differences in baseline characteristics.MethodsPropensity scores for each oral cavity cancer patient who underwent surgical resection and immediate reconstruction with a submental island flap or a radial forearm free flap with a flap size ≤ 60 cm2 between October 2008 and December 2021 were generated based on the likelihood of being selected given their baseline characteristics. Patients were matched using a 1:1 nearest-neighbor approach.ResultsThe final matched-pair analysis included 51 patients in each group. The 5-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, and locoregional control rates were 70.1% and 64.8% (p = 0.612), 77.3% and 83.7% (p = 0.857), and 76.1% and 73.3% (p = 0.664), respectively, for the submental island flap group and the radial forearm free flap group. Speech and swallowing functions were comparable between groups. However, there were significantly lower rates of complication associated with both donor and recipient sites in the submental island flap group, and also the duration of hospital stays and hospital costs were significantly lower in these patients. A subgroup analysis of patients in which the reconstruction was carried out using the submental island flap procedure revealed that in selected cases, the presence of clinically and pathologically positive level I lymph nodes did not affect survival or locoregional control rates.ConclusionsAlthough this study was not randomized, the matched-pair analysis of surgically treated oral cavity cancer patients showed that submental island flap reconstruction is as effective as radial forearm free flap reconstruction with regard to oncological and functional outcomes with lower complication rates, hospital stay, and hospital costs. This flap can be safely and effectively performed in selected cases with a clinical level I lymph node smaller than 1.5 cm and no signs of extranodal extension.

Early outcomes of osteofascial versus osteocutaneous fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction.

This study compares early outcomes of osteofascial fibula free flap (OF-FFF) with donor-site primary closure and osteocutaneous (OC) FFF with donor-site skin grafting in segmental mandibular reconstruction. A retrospective chart review of FFF mandibular reconstruction patients (2006-2022) divided into OF-FFF and OC-FFF groups. Clinical data, operative parameters, and early postoperative outcomes (≤ 90 days) were analyzed. The study included 67 patients (39 OF-FFF, 28 OC-FFF). OF-FFF had significantly lower donor-site complications (12.8% vs. 53.6%, p < 0.001) and revision surgeries (7.7% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.004) compared to OC-FFF. Recipient-site (28.2% vs. 25%, p = 0.77) and flap (15.4% vs. 17.9%, p > 0.99) complications were comparable. OF-FFF mandibular reconstruction with donor-site primary closure is a safe and reliable technique associated with superior donor-site and comparable flap and recipient-site outcomes to OC-FFF, thus may be considered as a viable alternative to OC-FFF for selected patients.

Inset techniques for the DIEP flap - what improves aesthetic outcomes?

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is widely considered as the gold standard in breast reconstruction. The inset technique of the DIEP flap is crucial in determining the overall aesthetic outcome; however, to date no systematic review is available that comprehensively assesses the various techniques. Evaluation of topic: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The methodology is outlined within our published protocol (Prospero CRD42023449477). Included articles met a minimal criterion compromising of the intervention (DIEP free flap for breast reconstruction) and outcomes (aesthetic and clinical outcomes). Six articles were included in this review, with a total of 346 patients and a follow-up ranging from 6 months to 4 years. Four articles were of a prospective case series study design, one article was a randomized controlled trial, and one article was a case-control study. The risk of bias was assessed to be high in the case series, but low and moderate in the randomized controlled trial and case-control study respectively. Although limited by the quality of the evidence, the single aesthetic unit principle, dual-plane inset, elimination of the need for a skin paddle, appropriate flap positioning and rotation, and algorithmic in-setting may all improve the aesthetic outcome of DIEP free flaps.

Mandible Reconstruction in a Rural Population: Comparison of Radial Forearm and Free Fibula Flap Outcomes.

Comparison of microsurgical reconstructive options after mandible resection is limited in the literature. Fibula free flaps (FFFs) can be costly and have timing limitations, but dental restoration can be performed, with varied reported rates of completion. The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) with mandible plating may be an alternative in select populations. The purpose of this study was to determine if the RFFF has similar outcomes to the FFF for mandible reconstruction in a rural population. A retrospective review of patients who underwent mandibulectomy from 2017 to 2021 at a single tertiary-care academic institution was performed. Those with FFF or RFFF reconstruction were included. Mandible defects were classified using the Jewer-Boyd H-C-L system. Sixty-eight patients were included with 53 undergoing FFF and 15 undergoing RFFF. Immediate reconstruction was significantly more common with RFFF than FFF (100% versus 64.2%; P =0.01). Lateral mandible defects were most common among both groups (52.9% FFF versus 73.3% RFFF; P =0.04). Osseous defect length was similar (9.5cm FFF versus 7.7cm RFFF; P =0.07), but soft tissue defect size was significantly larger in the RFFF group (28.6cm 2 versus 15.3cm 2 ; P =0.01). Complication rates (47.1% FFF versus 46.7% RFFF; P =0.98) and disease-free status at last follow-up (96.2% FFF versus 80.0% RFFF; P =0.06) were similar. Dental restoration occurred in 21.3% of patients undergoing FFF. Patients undergoing RFFF or FFF reconstruction after mandibulectomy had similar surgical and disease outcomes, with a low rate of completed dental restoration after FFF. Our findings suggest RFFF is a reasonable alternative to FFF for mandible reconstruction in select patients.

Free Flap Outcomes for Head and Neck Surgery in Patients with COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects the vascular system, subjecting patients to a hypercoagulable state. This is of particular concern for the success of microvascular free flap reconstruction. This study aims to report head and neck free flap complications in patients with COVID-19 during the perioperative period. We believe these patients are more likely to experience flap complications given the hypercoagulable state. This is a multi-institutional retrospective case series of patients infected with COVID-19 during the perioperative period for head and neck free flap reconstruction from March 2020 to January 2022. Data was collected on 40 patients from 14 institutions. Twenty-one patients (52.5%) had a positive COVID-19 test within 10 days before surgery and 7 days after surgery. The remaining patients had a positive test earlier than 10 days before surgery. A positive test caused a delay in surgery for 16 patients (40.0%) with an average delay of 44.7 days (9-198 days). Two free flap complications (5.0%) occurred with no free flap deaths. Four patients (10.0%) had surgical complications and 10 patients had medical complications (25.0%). Five patients (12.5%) suffered from postoperative COVID-19 pneumonia. Three deaths were COVID-19-related and one from cancer recurrence during the study period. Despite the heightened risk of coagulopathy in COVID-19 patients, head and neck free flap reconstructions in patients with COVID-19 are not at higher risk for free flap complications. However, these patients are at increased risk of medical complications. 4 Laryngoscope, 134:4521-4526, 2024.