Frailty Measures Research Articles

Frailty Trajectories Preceding Dementia in the US and UK.

An accessible marker of both biological age and dementia risk is crucial to advancing dementia prevention and treatment strategies. Although frailty is a candidate for that role, the nature of the relationship between frailty and dementia is not well understood. To clarify the temporal relationship between frailty and incident dementia by investigating frailty trajectories in the years preceding dementia onset. Participant data came from 4 prospective cohort studies: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, the Health and Retirement Study, the Rush Memory and Aging Project, and the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center. Data were collected between 1997 and 2024 and were analyzed from July 2023 to August 2024. The settings were retirement communities, national-level surveys, and a multiclinic-based cohort. Included individuals were 60 years or older and without cognitive impairment at baseline. Included individuals also had data on age, sex, education level, and ethnicity and a frailty index score calculated at baseline. Frailty was the main exposure, with participants' degrees of frailty quantified using retrospectively calculated frailty index scores. Incident all-cause dementia ascertained through physician-derived diagnoses, self- and informant-report, and estimated classifications based on combinations of cognitive tests. The participant number before exclusions was 87 737. After exclusions, data from 29 849 participants (mean [SD] age, 71.6 [7.7] years; 18 369 female [62%]; 257 963 person-years of follow-up; 3154 cases of incident dementia) were analyzed. Bayesian generalized linear mixed regression models revealed accelerations in frailty trajectories 4 to 9 years before incident dementia. Overall, frailty was positively associated with dementia risk (adjusted hazard ratios [aHRs] ranged from 1.18; 95% CI, 1.13-1.24 to 1.73; 95% CI, 1.57-1.92). This association held among participants whose time between frailty measurement and incident dementia exceeded the identified acceleration period (aHRs ranged from 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.23 to 1.43; 95% CI, 1.14-1.80). These findings suggest that frailty measurements may be used to identify high-risk population groups for preferential enrolment into clinical trials for dementia prevention and treatment. Frailty itself may represent a useful upstream target for behavioral and societal approaches to dementia prevention.

Change in frailty among older COVID-19 survivors.

COVID-19 survivors are at greater risk for new medical conditions. Among older adults, where multimorbidity and functional impairment are common, frailty measurement provides a tool for understanding how infection impacts future health beyond a one-disease-at-a-time approach. We investigated whether COVID-19 was associated with change in frailty among older Veterans. Data were from the Veterans Affairs (VA) COVID-19 Observational Research Collaboratory, which extracted VA medical record data. We included Veterans who had COVID-19 from March 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021 and matched uninfected controls. We excluded those <50 years at index or did not survive 12 months after. Frailty was assessed at the index date and 12 months using the VA Frailty Index (VA-FI). We assessed the number of new VA-FI deficits over 12 months. Analysis was done by negative binomial regression adjusted for age, gender, race, ethnicity, and BMI. Coefficients are given as the ratio of the mean number of new deficits in COVID-19 cases versus controls during follow-up. We identified 91,338 COVID-19-infected Veterans and an equal number of matched controls. Median (IQR) age was 68.9 years (60.3-74.2), 5% were female, 71% were White, and baseline VA-FI was 0.16 (0.10, 0.26). Median (IQR) number of new deficits at 1 year was 1 (0-2) for infected and 0 (0-1) for uninfected controls. After adjustment, those with COVID-19 accrued 1.54 (95% CI 1.52-1.56) times more deficits than those who did not. The five most common new deficits were fatigue (9.7%), anemia (6.8%), muscle atrophy (6.5%), gait abnormality (6.2%), and arthritis (5.8%). We found a greater increase in frailty among older Veterans with COVID-19 compared with matched uninfected controls, suggesting that COVID-19 infection has long-term implications for vulnerability and disability among older adults. Functional impairments such as fatigue, impaired mobility, and joint pain may warrant specific attention in this population.

Oral frailty and its association with systemic health: A narrative review

AbstractThis narrative review examined whether six measures of oral frailty (number of teeth present, chewing ability, articulatory oral motor skills, tongue pressure, difficulty in eating tough foods, and difficulty in swallowing fluids) were associated with an improvement in general health problems in older adults and whether interventions for oral functional decline would improve their general health status. We included longitudinal and intervention studies focusing on these six oral frailty parameters published between 2017 and 2020 in PubMed. The National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Toolkit for Quantitative Research was used to assess methodological quality. Twenty‐five longitudinal and four intervention studies met the eligibility criteria. Among the longitudinal studies, oral frailty (defined as the applicability of three or more of the six parameters) was associated with physical frailty, sarcopenia, need for nursing care, death, nutritional status, and home status; chewing and bite strength were associated with frailty and death; and dysphagia was associated with death. The intervention studies showed that five of the six oral frailty parameters could be improved, except the number of teeth. Further studies must be conducted on treatment methods to promote functional recovery in these five parameters and evaluate their relationship with the general health status.

Five-item Modified Frailty Index in Elderly Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Predicts Postoperative Complications.

Owing to underlying diseases and decreased physiological functions, frailty in elderly patients may be associated with adverse postoperative complications and mortality. To date, there are various frailty assessment methods, with the five-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) being an objective and concise evaluation tool. This study aimed to clarify whether mFI-5 scoring, a measure of frailty, can predict postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A total of 107 patients aged over 80 years who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery at Nagasaki University Hospital between 2011 and 2018 were included in this study. The mFI-5 was used to assess the preoperative condition of each patient, with scores compared against various postoperative outcome measures. Univariate analysis was used to determine between-group differences for pre- and post-operative variables. Of the 107 patients [median age, 83 (80-99) years], 44.9% were male. The mFI-5 score was calculated and patients were divided into three groups: 0 (n=36, 33.6%); 1 (n=44, 41.1%); and 2+ (n=27, 25.3%). The groups were significantly associated with the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification (p<0.001). Postoperative complications occurred in 43 patients (40.2%), and a higher mFI-5 score was significantly associated with postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III and duration of hospital stay. The mFI-5 is an objective and useful tool for predicting postoperative complications of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

Up-Front Treatment of Elderly (Age ≥75 Years) and Frail Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

Older patients with multiple myeloma (MM) exhibit wide heterogeneity in their baseline physiologic and functional status, which demands an individualized treatment approach based on biological rather than chronological age. Various frailty scores have been developed for older patients with MM, but they are underutilized in clinical trials and in practice. Older patients with MM are underrepresented in therapeutic clinical trials, and treatment recommendations are currently derived from clinical trials of transplant-ineligible patients. This article provides a summary of phase II and III clinical trials in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed MM, highlighting outcomes in patients aged ≥75 years and frailty-based outcomes. The data available thus far show that triplet regimens are more efficacious than doublets in older patients but may be associated with higher toxicity. DRd (daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone) and VRd (bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone) are good options in patients who are nonfrail, whereas dose-adjusted DRd and VRd-lite should be offered to frail patients. Frailty should be assessed regularly to guide treatment intensification and/or deescalation. It is important that frailty measures are incorporated in clinical trials evaluating novel treatments to inform how older and frail patients will benefit from these treatments.

Improving Surgical Outcomes for Older Adults with Adoption of Technological Advances in Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

Frailty is a well-recognized predictor of poor surgical outcomes for older adults, yet effective measurements and interventions remain limited. Technological advances offer an opportunity to address this gap and improve surgical care for older adults. This paper reviews the background of frailty and comprehensive geriatric assessments in surgery, and how technological innovations can advance frailty measurement and intervention in surgical settings. We review two broad areas of technological advancement as applied to frailty in surgery: 1) Innovation in the use of electronic health records (EHR) using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), and 2) Novel uses for wearable sensors and mobile health (mHealth) applications. We explore the integration of AI and ML with EHR systems, which can surpass traditional comorbidity indices by providing comprehensive health assessments and enhancing prediction models. Innovations like the electronic Frailty Index (eFI) show promise in expanding the reach of frailty assessments and facilitating real-time screening. Additionally, wearable devices and mobile health (mHealth) applications offer new ways to monitor and improve physical activity, nutrition, and psychological well-being, supporting perioperative rehabilitation. While these technologies present challenges, such as the need for infrastructure, training, and data interoperability, they offer promising strategies to facilitate the assessment and management of frailty among surgical patients. Continued research and tailored implementation strategies will be essential to fully realize the potential of these advancements in improving surgical outcomes for frail older adults.

Using Existing Clinical Data to Measure Older Adult Inpatients' Frailty at Admission and Discharge: Hospital Patient Register Study.

Frailty is a widespread geriatric syndrome among older adults, including hospitalized older inpatients. Some countries use electronic frailty measurement tools to identify frailty at the primary care level, but this method has rarely been investigated during hospitalization in acute care hospitals. An electronic frailty measurement instrument based on population-based hospital electronic health records could effectively detect frailty, frailty-related problems, and complications as well be a clinical alert. Identifying frailty among older adults using existing patient health data would greatly aid the management and support of frailty identification and could provide a valuable public health instrument without additional costs. We aim to explore a data-driven frailty measurement instrument for older adult inpatients using data routinely collected at hospital admission and discharge. A retrospective electronic patient register study included inpatients aged ≥65 years admitted to and discharged from a public hospital between 2015 and 2017. A dataset of 53,690 hospitalizations was used to customize this data-driven frailty measurement instrument inspired by the Edmonton Frailty Scale developed by Rolfson et al. A 2-step hierarchical cluster procedure was applied to compute e-Frail-CH (Switzerland) scores at hospital admission and discharge. Prevalence, central tendency, comparative, and validation statistics were computed. Mean patient age at admission was 78.4 (SD 7.9) years, with more women admitted (28,018/53,690, 52.18%) than men (25,672/53,690, 47.81%). Our 2-step hierarchical clustering approach computed 46,743 inputs of hospital admissions and 47,361 for discharges. Clustering solutions scored from 0.5 to 0.8 on a scale from 0 to 1. Patients considered frail comprised 42.02% (n=19,643) of admissions and 48.23% (n=22,845) of discharges. Within e-Frail-CH's 0-12 range, a score ≥6 indicated frailty. We found a statistically significant mean e-Frail-CH score change between hospital admission (5.3, SD 2.6) and discharge (5.75, SD 2.7; P<.001). Sensitivity and specificity cut point values were 0.82 and 0.88, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85. Comparing the e-Frail-CH instrument to the existing Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument, FIM scores indicating severe dependence equated to e-Frail-CH scores of ≥9, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.97 and 0.88, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.92. There was a strong negative association between e-Frail-CH scores at hospital discharge and FIM scores (rs=-0.844; P<.001). An electronic frailty measurement instrument was constructed and validated using patient data routinely collected during hospitalization, especially at admission and discharge. The mean e-Frail-CH score was higher at discharge than at admission. The routine calculation of e-Frail-CH scores during hospitalization could provide very useful clinical alerts on the health trajectories of older adults and help select interventions for preventing or mitigating frailty.

Examining Long-Term Influences of Frailty on Outcomes for Adults Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.

Frailty is common in adults with end-stage heart failure receiving a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Short-term studies show frailty reversal post-LVAD. Little is known about long-term frailty and how frailty relates to key LVAD outcomes, including depression, quality of life (QoL), and cognition beyond 6 months. The purpose of this study was to examine physical frailty, depression, QoL, and cognition from pre-LVAD implantation to 3, 6, and 12 months post-LVAD implantation. Clinical data and measures of physical frailty, depression, QoL, and cognition pre- and post-LVAD were extracted from an existing institutional database. Descriptive statistics and tests for statistical significance were used to describe and compare changes over time. Frailty trajectories were identified to describe physical frailty from pre-LVAD to 12 months post-LVAD. The sample (n = 46) was predominantly male (76%), with a mean age of 64.7 ± 11 years, and over half (n = 25) were physically frail. Physical frailty was reduced by nearly half at 12 months. Frailty, depression, and QoL significantly improved at all time points (P < .001). Improvements in cognition did not reach statistical significance. Recipients of LVAD without improvement in frailty exhibited worse depression, QoL, and cognition scores at 12 months compared with those not frail pre-LVAD or no longer frail post-LVAD implantation. Some recipients of LVADs experienced physical frailty reversal with benefits sustained long-term. Those without improvement recorded worse long-term patient-reported outcomes. Identifying factors that predict physical frailty response to LVAD implantation is a key area of future research.

Bidirectional association between frailty and quality of life within English longitudinal study of aging.

The relationship between quality of life (QoL) and frailty has previously been investigated cross-sectionally and longitudinally as unidirectional where QoL depends upon frailty and where frailty depends on QoL. Here a bidirectional relationship is examined. This work uses a latent curve model with structured residuals to address the bidirectional association between QoL and frailty in older English people considering within-person and group levels. The study measures frailty using a functional frailty measure and quality of life using CASP-12. The sample size is 17,529. There is a strong relationship between QoL (Quality of Life) and frailty, which is almost linear and inversely proportional over time. Although the cross-lagged coefficients from QoL to frailty and vice versa showed statistical significance, the impact was found to be minimal. The time between assessments (which are two years apart) and/or the few observations available per individual may have impacted the effect of this relationship. When accounting for gender, age, net wealth, and multimorbidity, some variations in the results were observed at the group level but not at the within-person level. The study provides empirical evidence that supports a bidirectional association between QoL and frailty in older individuals who reside at home. These results offer valuable insights for healthcare providers, as participants did not exhibit an advanced need for health services. Additionally, involving participants in evaluating and assessing these services enhances their effectiveness and overall benefit.

UroARC: A novel surgical risk calculator for older adults undergoing pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery.

Surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are commonly performed in older adults, many of whom are also frail. A surgical risk calculator for older adults undergoing POP/SUI surgeries that incorporates frailty, a factor known to increase the risk of surgical complications, would be helpful for preoperative counseling but currently does not exist. Medicare Carrier, Outpatient, and MedPAR files were examined for beneficiaries undergoing POP and SUI surgery between 2014 and 2016. A total of 15 POP/SUI categories were examined. The Claims-Based Frailty Index (CFI), a validated measure of frailty in Medicare data, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were deconstructed into their individual variables, and individual variables were entered into stepwise logistic regression models to determine which variables were most highly predictive of 30-day complications and 1-year mortality. To verify the prognostic accuracy for each model for surgical complications of interest, calibration curves and tests of model fit, including C-statistic, Brier scores, and Spiegelhalter p values, were determined. In total, 108 479 beneficiaries were included. Among these, 4.7% had CFI scores consistent with mild to severe frailty (CFI≥0.25). A total of 13 prognostic variable categories were found to be most highly predictive of postoperative complications. Calibration curves for each outcome of interest showed models were well-fit. Most models demonstrated high c-statistic values (≥0.7) and high Spiegelhalter p values (≥0.9), indicating good model calibration and excellent discrimination, and low Brier scores (<0.02), indicating high model accuracy. Urologic surgery for older Adults Risk Calculator serves as a novel surgical risk calculator that is readily accessible to both patients and clinicians that specifically factors in components of frailty. Furthermore, this calculator accounts for the heterogeneity of an aging population and can assist in individualized surgical decision-making for these common procedures.

Frailty Status, Not Just Age, is Associated With Postoperative Opioid Consumption: A Retrospective, Population-based Analysis

Objective: To assess the relationship between postoperative opioid consumption and frailty status. Background: Physiologic reserve can be assessed through both chronologic age as well as measures of frailty. Although prior studies suggest that older individuals may require less opioid following surgery, chronologic age, and frailty do not always align, and little is known regarding postoperative opioid consumption patterns by frailty. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of opioid-naïve adult patients undergoing common general, vascular, and gynecologic procedures across a statewide quality improvement program from November 6, 2017 to February 28, 2021. Our primary outcome was postoperative patient-reported opioid consumption within 30 days of surgery in oral morphine equivalents (OME). Our primary exposure was frailty status defined by the modified frailty index (mFi-5) criteria. Other covariates included patient demographic and clinical attributes, procedural factors, discharge opioid prescription size, and postoperative complications. Linear regression was performed to assess the association of frailty status and opioid consumption, stratified by age. Results: In this cohort of 34,854 patients, 10,596 had an mFi-5 score of ≤1 and 3,635 had a score of &gt;1. A score of &gt;1 was associated with increased patient-reported opioid consumption (OMEs 3.3 greater; 95% CI = 1.5–5.1). This held true for individuals over 65 (OMEs 2.7 greater; 95% CI = 0.2–5.1). Frailty status, regardless of score, was negatively associated with an opioid prescription at discharge. Conclusions: Frailty status is associated with increased opioid consumption after common operations. Future prescribing guidelines and outcomes analyses should consider this marker when reviewing opioid consumption data and related adverse outcomes.

Frailty, Body Composition, and Glycemic Control in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

The relationship between frailty and glycemic control in older adults with diabetes remains uncertain, mainly due to the fact that previous studies have not accounted for measures of body composition. In older adults with diabetes, we examined the association between three types of frailty measures and glycemic control, while accounting for fat-free mass (FFM) and waist circumference (WC). Eighty older adults (age ≥65, 27 women and 53 men, mean age 80.5±0.6 years) had gait speed, Cardiovascular Health Study Index (CHSI), Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale (RCFS), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HgA1C) measured. HgA1C showed a negative association only with CHSI (standardized β=-0.255±0.120, p=0.038), but no association with gait speed or the RCFS. Even after accounting for FFM and WC, we demonstrated a negative association between glycated hemoglobin and increasing frailty in older adults with diabetes.

A Hybrid Concept Analysis of Frailty Among Older Adults Living in the Community.

To analyse the concept of frailty through a literature review and in-depth interviews. A hybrid model of concept analysis. The theoretical phase identified 43 articles for reviewing the definition and measurement of frailty. Seven frail older adults were invited in the fieldwork phase for in-depth interviews. In the final analysis phase, results from the fieldwork and theoretical phases were integrated to obtain a final definition of frailty. Attributes of frailty were heterogeneous, involving dynamic/bidirectional, multidimensional and multiple systems. The antecedents of the concept were exposure to various stimuli and challenges in responding to these stimuli. Consequences included losing autonomy and adverse health outcomes. Four themes of frailty were identified based on the fieldwork data: 'accumulation of functional decline', 'powerlessness of coping with', 'vicissitudes of lived experience' and 'loss of autonomy and positivity'. The final definition of frailty was 'a dynamic and fluctuating process of powerlessness to manage biopsychosocial and environmental stimuli, involving functional decline and vicissitudes of life, which results in losing autonomy and positivity or adverse health outcomes'. Characterising the definition of frailty is essential for nurses to address the lived experiences of older adults when providing person-centred care and for developing interventions that meet the needs of frail older adults. Since some discrepancies existed in the definition of frailty from individual perception of older adults, combined in-depth interviews with a theoretical literature review were used to provide comprehensive insight. This concept analysis provides guidelines of training for nurses and opportunities to improving quality of life for community dwelling older adults. N/A. No Patient or Public Contribution.

UroARC: A Novel Surgical Risk Calculator for Older Adults Undergoing Suprapubic Tube Placement

ObjectivesTo develop a surgical risk calculator for older adults undergoing suprapubic tube (SPT) placement that specifically factors in frailty, a key predictor of surgical risk in this vulnerable and heterogenous population. MethodsMedicare MedPAR, Outpatient, and Carrier files for beneficiaries undergoing SPT placement between 2014-2016 were examined. The Claims-Based Frailty Index (CFI), a validated measure of frailty, was used to calculate baseline frailty for each beneficiary. Stepwise regression models were used for each variable within the CFI and Charlson Comorbidity Index to determine the variables most highly predictive of postoperative complications. The most highly predictive variables were then combined into parsimonious categories. To ensure the prognostic accuracy for each outcome, calibration curves and tests of model fit, including C-statistics, Brier scores, and Spiegelhalter p-values were calculated. ResultsA total of 26,999 beneficiaries were included. Among these, 39.1% were pre-frail, 36.8% were mildly frail, and 12.3% were moderately-to-severely frail. Thirteen prognostic variable categories were deemed highly predictive of postoperative complications of interest. All models demonstrated low Brier scores, indicating high model accuracy, and high C-statistic and Spiegelhalter p-values, consistent with excellent model discrimination and calibration, respectively. Excellent model fit was seen on calibration curves for each outcome. ConclusionsUroARC is a novel surgical tool for older adults undergoing SPT placement that specifically factors in frailty. This risk calculator has high accuracy, calibration, and discrimination, and serves as a valuable resource to patients and clinicians for those undergoing consideration for SPT placement.

Characterizing Psychological Resources and Resilience in Patients With Bladder Cancer: Associations With Frailty and Quality of Life.

Resilience, the ability to maintain or restore baseline function after a stressor, remains unexplored in patients with bladder cancer. Our objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of prospectively characterizing baseline resilience, related psychological resources, and frailty in patients with bladder cancer and evaluate associations with quality-of-life and mental health outcomes over time. We enrolled patients with bladder cancer (N = 67, September 2020-July 2021) into a prospective, observational, cohort study. At intake, patients completed validated assessments of frailty domains and psychological resources (resilience, psychological capital, self-compassion, and thriving, collectively PsyResources). Validated quality-of-life surveys were completed at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment selection. Correlation matrices were constructed to quantify correlations between baseline PsyResources and frailty measures (reported with Spearman correlation coefficient [ρ]). Associations between PsyResources and quality-of-life outcomes were evaluated with linear regression. The median age was 71 years (83.6% male), and 77.6% had muscle-invasive bladder cancer (cN+: 21%, M1: 7.6%). Baseline PsyResources were inversely correlated with the Geriatric Depression Scale (ρ = -0.50 to 0.65, P < .0001). Higher baseline PsyResources were associated with improved global symptoms and emotional function and decreased anxiety and depression over time (B: -0.17 to -2.5; P < .05). We present the first prospective characterization of baseline PsyResources in patients with bladder cancer. We observed positive correlations with improved mental health and quality-of-life outcomes over time. Ongoing work is exploring the relationship between resilience, frailty domains, and their role in functional recovery after treatment. Future work is needed to understand associations between PsyResources and treatment tolerance, recovery trajectories, and oncologic outcomes.

The Australian Frailty Network: Development of a consumer-focussed national response to frailty.

Frailty is an important concept in the care of older adults. Over the past two decades, significant advances have been made in measuring frailty. While it is now well-recognised that frailty status is an important determinant of outcomes from medical illnesses or surgical interventions, frailty measurement is not currently routinely integrated into clinical practice. In the community setting, it is uncommon for general practitioners to deliver frailty-optimised care. In hospitals, there is substantial variability in how people living with frailty are managed. This variability is notable between and even within disciplines. Furthermore, gains from understanding frailty mechanisms and risk factors are not yet applied/implemented at scale to delay the progression of frailty in community-dwellers. The Australian Frailty Network (AFN) is a national collaborative group of researchers, clinicians, non-government organisations, consumers and policymakers, in which the engagement and active involvement of consumers has been embedded from the outset. The AFN aims to generate new knowledge to improve health outcomes, to ensure evidence-based management is translated into clinical practice and to build capacity in multidisciplinary and translational frailty research. Here, we describe the development of the AFN, highlighting important milestones: (i) securing funding for the network and flagship elements; (ii) an inaugural summit to establish the strategic vision, values and scope with end-users; (iii) sabbatical visits to learn from international examples; and (iv) developing the governance structure and an actionable plan encompassing consumer engagement, research, education and policy and practice to maximise impact.

Development and Validation of the IDS-TILDA FI; A Novel Frailty Instrument for People with Intellectual Disability

Abstract Background Adults with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) are a vulnerable population, experiencing higher rates of multimorbidity, polypharmacy and healthcare inequities. Pre-existing functional disability and dependency complicates frailty measurement in ID. This study aimed to develop an ID-specific Frailty Index (FI), and compare frailty measurements between adults with and without ID. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted using the Intellectual Disability Supplement to The Irish Longitudinal Database of Aging (IDS-TILDA). A 31-item IDS-TILDA FI was developed. Markers of functional dependence were excluded avoid disability bias. The index was applied to 745 adults with ID, with results compared to the general population. Statistical analysis included multivariate regression on frailty controlling for age, sex, level of ID and presence of Down syndrome (DS). Multivariate logistic regression on Mortality controlling for age, Level of ID and DS was also conducted. Predictive validity was tested using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and evaluated the area under the curve (AUC). Results FI scores ranged from 0.00 to 0.59; median 0.16 and mean 0.19. These scores are lower than in other studies of frailty in ID, but higher than seen in the general population. Increasing frailty score was associated with older age (p&amp;lt;0.05), female sex (p&amp;lt;0.05) and severe/profound ID (p&amp;lt;0.05). Increasing frailty was associated with mortality, even when controlling for age (p&amp;lt;0.05). This association was lost when ID severity was included in analysis. FI score demonstrated moderate predictive validity for mortality (controlling for age, sex and Level of ID) with an AUC of 0.6101 (p&amp;lt;0.05, 95% CI: 0.564-0.656). Conclusion It is possible to measure frailty without measuring functional dependence. Frailty is more prevalent among adults with ID compared to the general population. The IDS-TILDA FI is associated with age and mortality, though the impact of severe ID could not be overcome highlighting the complexity of medical needs for adults with ID.

Time-To-Event Analysis Of Factors Influencing Delay In Discharge From A Subacute Complex Discharge Unit During The Pandemic

Abstract Background Length of stay (LOS) is the most common outcome measure of effectiveness in discharge planning. It refers to the time expressed in days between admission to and discharge from the hospital. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the average inpatient LOS was 5.8 days, representing a slight increase in the average inpatient LOS of 5.7 days between 2016–2019. Tackling delays in patient discharge is an ongoing challenge, and with the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been significant disruptions in discharge planning, discontinuity and incoordination between subacute complex discharge units and community care. Methods Our study analysed delaying factors amongst patients with LOS &amp;gt; 15 days during the COVID-19 pandemic using time-to-event analysis. Kaplan–Meier’s plot compared factors causing a delay in discharge to the single factors: age, gender, and multimorbidity. A multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted to age, gender, and multimorbidity predicted factors affecting LOS. Results A total of 390 patients were admitted between March 2020 – February 2021 to a subacute complex discharge unit in an Irish tertiary centre hospital: 326 (83.6%) were &amp;gt;65 years of age and 233 (59.7%) were female. The median (IQR) age was 79 (70–86) years with a median (IQR) of 19.4 (10–41) days. A total of 237 (60.7%) events were uncensored, with LOS &amp;gt; 15 days, of which 138 (58.2%) were female and 124 (52.32%) had &amp;gt; 4 comorbidities; 153 (39.2%) were censored into LOS ≤ 15 days, and death occurred in 19 (4.8%). Conclusion Our study is the first to analyse common factors delaying discharge from a complex discharge unit. Further research is required to explore multimorbidity as a risk factor for mortality in patients with prolonged LOS within a complex discharge unit and target gender-specific frailty measures to achieve high-quality patient management.

Longitudinal Frailty Transitions in Adults Aging with Intellectual Disability

Abstract Background Adults with Intellectual Disability (ID) are a vulnerable population, experiencing high rates of polypharmacy and multimorbidity, and experiencing early mortality. Lifelong functional and intellectual disability can complicate frailty measurement. To date, no studies have examined long term frailty transitions in this complex group. The aim of this study was to examine longitudinal frailty transitions, with the hope of distinguishing frailty from disability. Methods This study was conducted using The Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study of Aging (IDS-TILDA). It followed 745 adults with ID across 4 waves of data collection between 2010 and 2021. Frailty was measured at each wave using an ID-specific Frailty Index. Scores were classified into the following states: Non-Frail, Pre-Frail, Frail, Missing and Dead. Transitions are demonstrated visually using alluvial plots, created using the ggalluvial package in R. Multistate Markov Modelling was used to calculate transition probabilities between states across subsequent waves. Results Frailty transitions were common across the 4 waves. Both positive (decreasing frailty) and negative (increasing frailty) transitions were seen. There was a 6.8% probability of transitioning from Frail to Pre-Frail, and a 10.5% probability of transitioning from Pre-Frail to Non-Frail. The probabilities of negative transitions were higher than positive transitions. The probability of transitioning to death was higher in higher frailty states: Non-Frail = 2.6%, Pre-Frail = 5.1%, Frail = 19.3%. Compared to the general population, positive transitions were less likely. Conclusion This is the first study to demonstrate transitions in frailty states in adults with ID. To date, singe time-point studies of frailty in ID have faced the struggle of distinguishing frailty from underlying disability. For adults with ID, lifelong disability is expected to be relatively static. The dynamism captured here points to frailty as a distinct entity experienced by this group. Efforts are needed to better manage frailty in this vulnerable cohort.

Assessment of Racial Bias within the Risk Analysis Index of Frailty

Objective: Our objective was to assess potential racial bias within the Risk Analysis Index (RAI). Background: Patient risk measures are rarely tested for racial bias. Measures of frailty, like the RAI, need to be evaluated for poor predictive performance among Black patients. Methods: Retrospective cohort study using April 2010–March 2019 Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program and 2010–2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. The performance of the RAI and several potential variants were compared between Black and White cases using various metrics to predict mortality (180-day for Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program, 30-day for National Surgical Quality Improvement Program). Results: Using the current, clinical threshold, the RAI performed as good or better among Black cases across various performance metrics versus White. When a higher threshold was used, Black cases had higher true positive rates but lower true negative rates, yielding 2.0% higher balanced accuracy. No RAI variant noticeably eliminated bias, improved parity across both true positives and true negatives, or improved overall model performance. Conclusions: The RAI tends to predict mortality among Black patients better than it predicts mortality among White patients. As existing bias-reducing techniques were not effective, further research into bias-reducing techniques is needed, especially for clinical risk predictions. We recommend using the RAI for both statistical analysis of surgical cohorts and quality improvement programs, such as the Surgical Pause.