Fracture Subtypes Research Articles

Odontoid Fractures: A Review of the Current State of the Art.

Odontoid fractures (OFs) represent up to 15% of all cervical fractures encountered and present most commonly amongst elderly patients, typically in the setting of low energy trauma such as falls. The Anderson and D'Alonzo classification and Roy-Camille subtype description are the most clinically noteworthy descriptions of OFs used. Even though most patients will not present with neurological injury, mechanical instability can occur with type II and type III (Anderson and D'Alonzo) fractures, particularly if the transverse ligament of the atlas is ruptured; however, this is very rare. Conservative treatment is usually employed for type I and type III injuries, and to a varying degree for non-displaced type II injuries. Surgical treatment is typically reserved for type II fractures, patients with neurological injury, and in the setting of other associated fractures or ligamentous injury. Anterior screw fixation is a viable option in the setting of a favorable fracture line orientation in type II fractures, whereas posterior C1-C2 screw fixation is an option for any type II or type III fracture presentation. There is evidence that surgery for type II fractures has higher rates of union and lower mortality than nonoperative treatments. While surgical options have increased over the decades and the management of OF has been optimized by considering fracture subtypes and patient factors, there remains a significant morbidity and mortality associated with OFs. The aging population and changing demographics suggest that there will be an ongoing rise in the incidence of OFs. Therefore, the appropriate management of these cases will be essential for ensuring optimization of health care resources and the quality of life of affected patients.

Sliding hip screw versus intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fracture regarding death within 120 days and ability to return to independent living.

The primary aim of this study was to compare surgical methods (sliding hip screw (SHS) vs intramedullary nailing (IMN)) for trochanteric hip fracture in relation to death within 120 days after surgery and return to independent living. The secondary aim was to assess whether the associations between surgical method and death or ability to return to independent living varied depending on fracture subtype or other patient characteristics. A total of 27,530 individuals from the Swedish Hip Fracture Register RIKSHÖFT (SHR) aged ≥ 70 years, admitted to hospital between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019 with trochanteric hip fracture, were included. Within this cohort, 12,041 individuals lived independently at baseline, had follow-up information in the SHR, and were thus investigated for return to independent living. Death within 120 days after surgery was analyzed using Cox regression with SHS as reference and adjusted for age and fracture type. Return to independent living was analyzed using logistic regression adjusted for age and fracture type. Analyses were repeated after stratification by fracture type, age, and sex. Overall, 2,171 patients (18%) who were operated with SHS and 2,704 patients (18%) who were operated with IMN died within 120 days after surgery. Adjusted Cox regression revealed no difference in death within 120 days for the whole group (hazard ratio 0.97 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.03)), nor after stratification by fracture type. In total, 3,714 (66%) patients who were operated with SHS and 4,147 (64%) patients who were operated with IMN had returned to independent living at follow-up. There was no significant difference in return to independent living for the whole group (odds ratio 0.95 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.03)), nor after stratification by fracture type. No overall difference was observed in death within 120 days or return to independent living following surgery for trochanteric hip fracture, depending on surgical method (SHS vs IMN) in this recent Swedish cohort, but there was a suggested benefit for SHS in subgroups of patients.

Predictive factors to return to sport after surgical management of ankle fractures

Achieving Return to Sport (RTS) is crucial in managing ankle fractures for athletes. This study aimed to identify RTS factors post-surgical fixation of ankle fractures. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 93 active patients with surgically treated displaced or unstable ankle fractures from January 2020 to January 2021. The median follow-up was 2.12 years. Clinical, functional, and radiographic aspects were evaluated. Among the athletes, 82.8% resumed sports post-surgery, with 26.9% returning within 3 months and 75.3% at 1 year. At 1 year, 40.9% regained their pre-injury activity level. There was a significant association between RTS and AO/OTA fracture subtype (p = 0.038). Unimalleolar fractures had the best outcomes, with 100% achieving RTS in a median of 4 months. Bimalleolar fractures had 80.77% RTS in 6 months, and trimalleolar fractures had 65.22% RTS in 8 months. AO/OTA subtypes B and C predicted lower RTS to pre-injury levels, with delayed recovery for bimalleolar and trimalleolar fractures. These findings underscore the impact of fracture severity on RTS, with more complex fractures leading to poorer and delayed recovery outcomes.Level of evidence: III

Enoxaparin and Early Postoperative Tibial Nailing: Increased Nonunion Revision Rates.

To determine the association between postoperative enoxaparin use and the risk of requiring surgery for nonunion in patients treated with intramedullary nailing for midshaft fractures of the tibia. Retrospective cohort analysis. Data were sourced from the PearlDiver national database. Patients were identified through the PearlDiver database by using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes. Included patients had undergone intramedullary nailing for midshaft fractures of the tibia between 2015 and 2020 and subsequently underwent revision surgery due to nonunion. The primary outcome measured in this study was the rate of nonunion following intramedullary nailing for the different types of tibial shaft fractures (closed, Type I/II open, Type III open). For each fracture subtype, the study compared nonunion rates between those who received enoxaparin in the postoperative period and those who did not receive enoxaparin at any time during the first 6 weeks postoperatively. Factors such as the timing and duration of enoxaparin therapy and demographic variables were also considered. The study included 16,986 patients, average age was 49.2 years (SD 17.3); 43.1% were female. Five hundred four patients required revision surgery for nonunion (3.4%). Among patients who did not receive enoxaparin, the nonunion rates were 1.6%, 3.9%, and 6.9% for closed, Type I/II open, and Type III open fractures, respectively. For patients who received enoxaparin within the first 2 weeks, the nonunion rates were 2.6%, 4.7%, and 7.9% for closed (RR = 1.67, P < 0.0001), Type I/II open (RR = 1.21, P < 0.0001), and Type III open (RR = 1.17, P = 0.355) fractures, respectively. Logistic regression confirmed enoxaparin was independently associated with nonunion (odds ratios [OR] = 1.75, P = 0.0013 for closed fractures; OR = 1.51, P = 0.034 for Type I/II open fractures). Tobacco use was also a contributing factor (OR = 2.43, P < 0.0001 for closed fractures; OR = 2.00, P < 0.0001 for Type I/II open fractures; OR = 2.04, P = 0.0008 for Type III open fractures). The postoperative use of enoxaparin was associated with an elevated risk of nonunion in patients treated with intramedullary nailing for fractures of the tibial shaft. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Short-Term Study of 18 Cases of Distal Femur Fractures Managed By Locking Compression Plate [Lcp] Using A Less Invasive Skeletal Stabilisation System [LISS

Distal femur fractures have traditionally been the most challenging to treat. Restoring full motion and function to the knee may be challenging due to these fractures' proximity to the knee joint. Regardless of the treatment method, comminution, damage of soft tissue, fracture extension into the knee joint, and related injury to the quadriceps mechanism frequently concludes in suboptimal outcomes. The early surgical fixation notion, increased implant availability, early postoperative knee joint immobilization, and a better understanding of damage patterns have all significantly improved the patient's functional result. Our study focuses on distal femur fractures managed by LCP [locking compression plate] using a less invasive skeletal stabilization system [LISS]. This is a retrospective research of 18 cases of distal femur fractures in adults who had LCP treatment with the LISS. The operation at Saveetha Medical College and Hospital in Chennai runs from January 2021 to January 2022. All types of intercondylar and supracondylar fractures are included. Children's fractures and pathological fractures were not included. Age distribution, side of injury, sex distribution, anatomy of injury, mechanism of injury, damage grading, subtype of fracture, concomitant injuries, and open fractures were the parameters used to assess the cases. AP and lateral views of the X-ray were taken. A thorough preoperative workup was completed. Every case was scheduled for surgery as soon as feasible. External fixators were used in the initial treatment of complicated cases. Patients underwent locking compression plate (LCP) fixation with the LISS. Radiological examination immediately following surgery, four weeks, six weeks, eight weeks, twelve weeks, four months, and every six months for a maximum of one year.The age range of the patients was 21 to 70 years, with a mean age of 30 years. A maximum incidence of fractures was noted in individuals aged 40 to 60. Males accounted for the majority of the 18 cases, with a female-to-male ratio of 3:5. Our series was predominantly right-sided. The most frequent cause of injury has been traffic accidents. Throughout the research period, no patients were lost to follow-up. Of the eighteen cases, the majority involved distal femur fractures, with intercondylar extension accounting for a higher number of cases, and isolated supracondylar fractures following. A head injury was present in one case, and acetabular fracture in another, a Boxer’s fracturein a third case, and 2 open fractures (1 compound grade III A, the other compound grade II). The fractures took an average of 13.3 weeks to heal. It required an average of 15.3 weeks longer in cases of compound fractures. Less than six degrees of malalignment (varus, valgus) were present. Every patient exhibited optimal articular alignment.Excellent outcomes were obtained with the LISS, which combines appropriate physiotherapy with an LCP (angle stable build). In principle, an LCP implant is the best option for fractured and osteoporotic bones. In summary, the use of LCPs in the LISS appears to yield superior outcomes when managing distal femur fractures.

Atypical Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Might be Considered a Distinct Subtype of Atypical Femoral Fracture: A Retrospective Study.

The exact relationship among atypical periprosthetic femoral fractures (APFFs), typical periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs), and atypical femur fractures (AFFs) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of APFFs among PFFs and to identify the clinical characteristics, management, and prognosis that distinguish APFFs from typical PFFs and AFFs to further determine the relationship among these three fracture types. In this retrospective study, we reviewed the clinical data of 117 consecutive patients who had PFFs after hip arthroplasty between January 2012 and December 2022 and further classified them into an APFF group and a typical PFF group according to the revised ASBMR diagnostic criteria for AFF. Moreover, patients who had subtrochanteric or femoral shaft fractures in the same period and met the diagnostic criteria for AFF were recruited and classified into the AFF group. Demographic information, minor features of AFF, comorbidities, history of medication usage, management, and complications were collected and compared among patients with typical PFFs, APFFs, and AFFs. Eleven PFFs were identified as APFFs, and the prevalence of APFFs among PFFs was 9.4%. Significant differences were found in generalized increase in cortical thickness (p = 0.019), prodromal symptoms (p < 0.001), and the incidence of bilateral fractures (p = 0.010) among the groups, where the incidences of these minor features in the APFF group and the AFF group were higher than those in the typical PFF group. Of note, the duration of fracture healing of APFFs was significantly longer than that of typical PFFs and AFFs (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). In addition, the APFF group and the AFF group had higher proportions of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (p = 0.004 and p = 0.027, respectively), bisphosphonate (BP) usage (p = 0.026 and p < 0.001, respectively), and longer duration of BP usage (p = 0.003 and p = 0.007, respectively) than the typical PFF group. Furthermore, significant differences were found in management (p < 0.001) and complication rate (p = 0.020) among the groups, and the rate of complications in the APFF group and the AFF group was higher than that in the typical PFF group. APFFs not only fulfilled the mandatory and major diagnostic criteria for AFF but also had many clinical characteristics, management and prognosis distinguishing them from typical PFFs but resembling AFFs; hence, the diagnostic criteria for AFF might be revised to incorporate APFF as a distinct subtype of the condition.

Two-Year Mortality Predictors in Fragility Fractures-A Medical Records Review Study.

To evaluate two-year mortality predictors in all subtypes of fragility fractures. Medical records review, single-center study with Portuguese patients with fragility fractures; A univariate analysis, with chi-square for categorical variables and parametric t-student and non-parametric Wilcoxon tests for continuous variables, was performed. Posteriorly, a survival analysis, with subsequent Cox regression was conducted to establish independent risk factors/ predictors of two-year mortality in fragility fractures. 758 patients were enrolled in the study. We found a total of 151 deaths within the first two years post-fracture. On Cox regression, older age [OR1.10 CI (1.05-1.11)], male sex [OR1.85 CI(1.24-2.75)], anemia at baseline [OR2.44 CI(1.67-3.57)], malignancy [OR4.68 CI (2.13-10.27)], and multimorbidity [OR1.78 CI(1.11-2.87)] were found as independent predictors for two-year post-fracture mortality. Our study suggests that male sex, older age, anemia, malignancy, and multimorbidity are mortality predictors in the first two years after fragility fractures, reinforcing the importance of comorbidity management in preventing or, at least, minimizing adverse outcomes following fragility fractures.

Is the Diagnosis of fifth Metatarsal Fracture Type Consistent? An Interobserver Reliability Study.

Treatment pathways of fifth metatarsal fractures are commonly directed based on fracture classification, with particular proximal fractures typically requiring closer observation and possibly more aggressive management. Our aim is to investigate the interobserver reliability of assessment of subtypes of fifth metatarsal fractures. We included all patients referred to our virtual fracture clinic with a suspected or confirmed fifth metatarsal fracture. Plain anteroposterior radiographs were reviewed by 2 novice observers, initially trained on the fifth metatarsal classification identification. Eight different zones were defined based on anatomical location. Patients were excluded from analysis if neither observer could identify a fracture. An interobserver reliability analysis using Cohen κ coefficient was carried out, and degree of observer agreement described using Landis and Koch's description. All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS, version 27. A total of 1360 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified. The 2 observers had moderate agreement when identifying fractures in all zones, apart from zone 1.2 and distal metaphysis (DM) fractures, which only achieved fair agreement (κ = 0.308 and 0.381 respectively). Zone 3 has slight agreement with zone 2 proximally, and there is an apparent difficulty with distal diaphyseal shaft (DS) fractures, resulting in a lot of crossover with DM, achieving a fair level of agreement (DS 312 vs 196; DM 120 vs 237; κ = .398, P < .001). Reliability of subcategorizing fifth metatarsal fractures using standardized instructions conveys moderate agreement in most cases. If the region of the fracture is going to be used in an algorithm to guide a management plan and clinical follow-up during a virtual clinic review, defining fractures of zones 1-3 needs careful consideration. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

IS THE DIAGNOSIS OF FIFTH METATARSAL FRACTURE SUBTYPE CONSISTENT? AN INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY STUDY

IntroductionTreatment pathways of 5th metatarsal fractures are commonly directed based on fracture classification, with Jones types for example, requiring closer observation and possibly more aggressive management.Primary objectiveTo investigate the reliability of assessment of subtypes of 5th metatarsal fractures by different observers.MethodsPatients were identified from our prospectively collected database. We included all patient referred to our virtual fracture clinic with a suspected or confirmed 5th metatarsal fracture. Plain AP radiographs were reviewed by two observers, who were initially trained on the 5th metatarsal classification identification. Zones were defined as Zone 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2, 3, diaphyseal shaft (DS), distal metaphysis (DM) and head. An inter-observer reliability analysis using Cohen's Kappa coefficient was carried out, and degree of observer agreement described using Landis &amp; Koch's description. All data was analysed using IBM SPSS v.27.Results878 patients were identified. The two observers had moderate agreement when identifying fractures in all zones, apart from metatarsal head fractures, which scored substantial agreement (K=.614). Zones 1.1 (K=.582), 2 (K=.536), 3 (K=.601) and DS (K=.544) all tended towards but did not achieve substantial agreement. Whilst DS fractures achieved moderate agreement, there was an apparent difficulty with distal DS, resulting in a lot of cross over with DM (DS 210 vs 109; DM 76 vs 161). Slight agreement with the next highest adjacent zone was found when injuries were thought to be in zones 1.2, 1.3 and 2 (K=0.17, 0.115 and 0.152 respectively).ConclusionsReliability of sub-categorising 5th metatarsal fractures using standardised instructions conveys moderate to substantial agreement in most cases. If the region of the fracture is going to be used in an algorithm to guide a management plan and clinical follow up during a virtual clinic review, defining fractures of zones 1–3 needs careful consideration.

Does delay to theatre influence morbidity or mortality in femoral periprosthetic fractures?

Femoral periprosthetic fractures are rising in incidence. Their management is complex and carries a high associated mortality. Unlike native hip fractures, there are no guidelines advising on time to theatre in this group. We aim to determine whether delaying surgical intervention influences morbidity or mortality in femoral periprosthetic fractures. We identified all periprosthetic fractures around a hip or knee arthroplasty from our prospectively collated database between 2012 and 2021. Patients were categorized into early or delayed intervention based on time from admission to surgery (early = ≤ 36 hours, delayed > 36 hours). Patient demographics, existing implants, Unified Classification System fracture subtype, acute medical issues on admission, preoperative haemoglobin, blood transfusion requirement, and length of hospital stay were identified for all patients. Complication and mortality rates were compared between groups. A total of 365 patients were identified: 140 in the early and 225 in the delayed intervention group. Mortality rate was 4.1% at 30 days and 19.2% at one year. There was some indication that those who had surgery within 36 hours had a higher mortality rate, but this did not reach statistical significance at 30 days (p = 0.078) or one year (p = 0.051). Univariate analysis demonstrated that age, preoperative haemoglobin, acute medical issue on admission, and the presence of postoperative complications influenced 30-day and one-year mortality. Using a multivariate model, age and preoperative haemoglobin were independently predictive factors for one-year mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.071; p < 0.001 and OR 0.980; p = 0.020). There was no association between timing of surgery and postoperative complications. Postoperative complications were more likely with increasing age (OR 1.032; p = 0.001) and revision arthroplasty compared to internal fixation (OR 0.481; p = 0.001). While early intervention may be preferable to reduce prolonged immobilization, there is no evidence that delaying surgery beyond 36 hours increases mortality or complications in patients with a femoral periprosthetic fracture.

Clinical study on the incidence of femoral head posterior tilt angle in non-displaced femoral neck fractures

To investigate the occurrence of posterior femoral head tilt after clinical non-displaced femoral neck fracture, and to provide a reference basis for clinical surgery and improvement of disease prognosis. Total of 165 patients with non-displaced femoral neck fractures of Garden typeⅠandⅡfrom January 2018 to June 2022 were selected as study subjects including 48 males and 117 females, with an average age of (71.5±8.5) years old ranging from 53 to 89, involving 97 cases of typeⅠand 68 of typeⅡ. On the patient's preoperative sagittal or axial CT film of the hip, the angle formed by the radius line of the femoral head and the midline of the femoral neck was used as the posterior tilt angle of the femoral head (α), and the posterior tilt femoral head angle was measured using the method proposed by Palm. The measured data were divided into 6 groups:α<0°, 0°<α< 5°, 5°≤α<10°, 10°≤α<15°, 15°≤α<20°, α≥20°, and the incidence of different ranges of posterior tilt angle was compared. The sex composition ratio of 165 patients were analyzed and compared, and the age of 65 was used as the cut-off point to compare the incidence of fractures between genders. Patients were divided into the posterior tilt <20° group for 135 cases and the posterior tilt ≥20°group for 30 cases according to the preoperative posterior tilt angle, the differences between two groups in terms of gender and age were analyzed. Among 165 patients with non-displaced femoral neck fractures, 143 cases with poaterior tilt of the femoral head occurred with an incidence of 86.7%. Posterior tilt 0°<α<5° accounted for 36 cases with an incidence of 21.8%;5°≤α<10° accounted for 40 cases with an incidence of 24.2%;10°≤α<15° accounted for 27 cases with an incidence of 16.4%;15°≤α<20° accounted for 10 cases with an incidence of 6.1%;posterior tilt angle α≥20° accounted for 30 cases, the incidence was 18.2%, of which the maximum posterior tilt angle was 42.7°. Statistical analysis showed that the percentage of fractures in the 165 patients selected for this study was significantly higher in female than in male, and that the female group was more likely to have fractures before the age of 65 years compared to the male group. However, gender, age and fracture subtypes (GardenⅠ, Ⅱ) were not influential factors for femoral neck fractures with a preoperative posterior femoral head tilt angle >20°(P>0.05). The incidence of femoral head posterior tile in non-displaced femoral neck fractures is relatively high, in which severe posterior tile occurs, and the femoral head posterior tile angle≥20° can reach 18.2%. In patients with closed reduction internal fixation, the fracture end needs to be repositioned as much as possible to reduce the risk of postoperative avascular necrosis of the femoral head. In order to prevent femoral neck fractures, special attention should be paid to anti-osteoporosis treatment for female. Preoperative assessment of posterior tilt is critical for patients of different ages, genders and fracture subtypes (GardenⅠ, Ⅱ).

In Which Cases Do We Operate? Posterior Malleolar Fractures-Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of the Bartoníček/Rammelt Classification and Corresponding Surgery Rates.

The Bartoníček/Rammelt classification is established for posterior malleolar fractures. It subdivides the fractures into 5 types and outlines treatment recommendations. This study aims to determine the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the Bartoníček/Rammelt classification and investigates its applicability regarding treatment recommendations. Computed tomography (CT) scans of 80 ankle fractures with a posterior malleolar fracture were analyzed by four observers at two different time points 30 days apart (d1 and d2). Intrarater and interrater reliability was measured using kappa values. The corresponding surgery rates of the fracture subtypes were analyzed, and the surgery rates were correlated with fragment sizes and displacements. A moderate interobserver reliability for d1 0.41 (CI 0.35-0.47) and d2 0.42 (CI 0.36-0.48) was detected. Intraobserver reliability was documented as perfect, with a mean kappa of 0.83. Type II fractures were operated on in 50% of cases. In 50% of type II cases, a nonoperative treatment was chosen. Fragment size correlated strongly with the chosen therapy, and osteosynthesis was performed significantly more often when the fragment size exceeded 3 cm3 (P < .01). The Bartoníček/Rammelt classification system showed moderate interobserver reliability and perfect to substantial intraobserver reliability. In clinical practice of this study cohort, the size of the posterior malleolar fragment rather than the dislocation and joint impaction seemed to have the decision to operate on type II or III fractures. Existing treatment recommendations based on the Bartoníček/Rammelt classification correspond to the therapy algorithm carried out in this cohort of patients.Levels of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective study.

Is it necessary to graft the void defect during open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures?

There are still controversies on the effect of grafting during open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures. The aim of this study was to compare the radiological and functional outcomes in patients with or without intraoperative grafting. In a comparative retrospective study, among 442 operatively-treated calcaneal fractures, 60 patients with unilateral closed sanders type II intraarticular calcaneal fracture who underwent ORIF via lateral extensile approach using locking anatomical plates with at least 1year follow-up without any postoperative wound complication were enrolled. The patients were separated into 2 groups: with bone allograft and without bone allograft. The functional outcome of the patients was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale, foot function index (FFI), and short-form (SF-36) health survey. Radiographic variables included Böhler angle, Gissane angle, calcaneal width, calcaneal height, and talar declination angle. Also, the differences (delta) of these values in comparison to the uninjured foot were calculated. The mean age was 39.1 ± 12.7 (range, 13-67) years with 54 males, 90.0%. No statistically significant differences were detected in age, gender, affected side, and subtypes of calcaneal fractures between the two groups (p > 0.05). The average follow-up was 25.1 (range, 12-48) months. The differences for all radiographic measurements and also, the delta values between the groups were not statistically significant, except talar declination angle which was more in cases without grafting (p = 0.007). Although the differences between the two groups regarding AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale (p = 0.257), VAS for pain (p = 0.645), and FFI (p = 0.261) were not statistically significant; the group with bone graft experienced less pain (19.7 ± 22.0) than the other group (26.7 ± 22.8). The difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.87) according to the SF-36 questionnaire. Incorporating allografts into the void defects during ORIF of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures may not improve functional outcomes and recover postoperative radiological parameters. Therefore, routine use of allograft to fill the defects during ORIF of calcaneus may not be recommended. Of note, that these findings solely relate to the treatment of Sanders type II fractures. Comparative retrospective study.

DOES AN INTRAOPERATIVE FEMORAL FRACTURE IMPACT ONE-YEAR PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES WHEN USING A CEMENTLESS CORAIL STEM?

The significance of periprosthetic fractures about a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is becoming increasingly important. Recent studies have demonstrated post-operative periprosthetic fracture rates are higher amongst cemented polished taper slip (PTS) stem designs compared to collared cementless (CC) designs.However, in the National Joint Registry, the rate of intra-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IOPFF) with cementless implant systems remains higher (0.87% vs 0.42%. p &lt;0.001) potentially leading to more post-operative complications.This study identifies the incidence of IOPFF, the fracture subtype and compares functional outcomes and revision rates of CC femoral implants with an IOPFF to CC stems and PTS stems without a fracture.5376 consecutive CC stem THA, carried out through a posterior approach were reviewed for IOPFF. Each fracture was subdivided into calcar fracture, greater trochanter (GT) fracture or shaft fracture.1:1:1 matched analysis was carried out to compare Oxford scores at one year. Matching criteria included; sex (exact), age (± 1 year), American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade (exact), and date of surgery (± 6 months).Electronic records were used to review revision rates.Following review of the CC stems, 44 (0.8%) were identified as having an IOPFF. Of these 30 (0.6%) were calcar fractures, 11 (0.2%) GT fractures and 3 (0.06%) were shaft fractures. There were no shaft penetrations.Overall, no significant difference in Oxford scores at one year were observed when comparing the CC IOPFF, CC non-IOPFF and PTS groups.There were no CC stems revised for any reason with either a calcar fracture or trochanteric fracture within the period of 8 years follow-up.IOPFF do occur more frequently in cementless systems than cemented. The majority are calcar and GT fractures. These fractures, when identified and managed intra-operatively, do not have worse functional outcomes or revision rates compared to matched non-IOPFF cases.

Factors associated with increased radiation exposure in the fixation of proximal femoral fractures.

When using radiation intraoperatively, a surgeon should aim to keep the radiation dose as low as is reasonably achievable to obtain the therapeutic goal. We aimed to investigate factors associated with increased radiation exposure in fixation of proximal femur fractures. We assessed 369 neck of femur fractures over a 1-year period in a district general hospital. All hip fracture subtypes that had undergone surgical fixation were included. We assessed the relationship between type of fracture, implants used and surgeon level of experience with the dose-area product (DAP; cGy/cm2) and screening time (dS). We also looked at the quality of reduction and fixation and its effect on the radiation exposure. A total of 184 patients were included in our analysis; 185 patients who were treated with hip arthroplasty were excluded. There was a significant association between higher DAP and fracture subtype (p = 0.001), fracture complexity (p < 0.001), if an additional implant was used (p = 0.001), if fixation was satisfactory (p = 0.002) and operative time (p < 0.001). DAP was higher with a proximal femoral nail than with a dynamic hip screw, especially when a long nail was used. There was some evidence of an association between the surgeon's level of experience and DAP exposure, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.069). Increased radiation in proximal femur fractures is seen in the fixation of complex fractures, some subtypes, with certain types of implants used and if an additional implant was required. Surgeon seniority did not result in less radiation exposure, which is in contrast to other published studies.

Timelines for Return to Different Sports Types After Eight Cervical Spine Fractures in Recreational and Elite Athletes: A Survey of the Association for Collaborative Spine Research.

Prospective cross-sectional survey. To identify timelines for when athletes may be considered safe to return to varying athletic activities after sustaining cervical spine fractures. While acute management and detection of cervical spine fractures have been areas of comprehensive investigation, insight into timelines for when athletes may return to different athletic activities after sustaining such fractures is limited. A web-based survey was administered to members of the Association for Collaborative Spine Research that consisted of surgeon demographic information and questions asking when athletes (recreational vs elite) with one of 8 cervical fractures would be allowed to return to play noncontact, contact, and collision sports treated nonoperatively or operatively. The third part queried whether the decision to return to sports was influenced by the type of fixation or the presence of radiculopathy. Thirty-three responses were included for analysis. For all 8 cervical spine fractures treated nonoperatively and operatively, significantly longer times to return to sports for athletes playing contact or collision sports compared with recreational and elite athletes playing noncontact sports, respectively (P< 0.05), were felt to be more appropriate. Comparing collision sports with contact sports for recreational and elite athletes, similar times for return to sports for nearly all fractures treated nonoperatively or operatively were noted. In the setting of associated radiculopathy, the most common responses for safe return to play were "when only motor deficits resolve completely" and "when both motor and sensory deficits resolve completely." In this survey of spine surgeons from the Association for Collaborative Spine Research, reasonable timeframes for return to play for athletes with 8 different cervical spine fractures treated nonoperatively or operatively varied based on fracture subtype and level of sporting physicality.

Headless screw fixation of unstable ulnar styloid base fractures after distal radial fractures fixation

Ulnar styloid fractures occur frequently concomitant with distal radial fractures. Although unstable distal radial fractures are mostly surgically treated, ulnar styloid fractures are often ignored. Unstable fractures at the base of the ulnar styloid may lead to persistent ulnar pain, due to distal radioulnar joint instability or ulnar styloid non-union.We retrospectively analyzed a single-surgeon cohort series of surgically treated distal radial fractures on how these concomitant ulnar styloid fractures were regarded: indications for surgery and surgical technique with headless screw fixation.119 surgically treated distal radial fractures were assessed. 51 (42.8%) of the surgically treated distal radial fractures had a distal ulnar fracture, and more specifically 23 (19.3%) had a base fracture of the ulnar styloid. 9 (7.6%) of the wrists had a base fracture of the ulnar styloid which was considered after distal radial fracture fixation as persistently unstable, during distal radioulnar joint ballottement translation test. This fracture subtype was immediately treated with headless screw fixation, resulting in all cases in bony union, with a mean active pronation of 85°, a mean active supination of 80° and a clinical stable distal radioulnar joint, with minimal ulnar pain after 6 weeks (mean Visual Analogue Scale 1). After at least 12 months, persistent pain did not occur and mean QuickDASH was 2.5.According to this single-surgeon cohort series, headless screw fixation provides a reliable treatment for unstable base fractures of the ulnar styloid after distal radial fixation.

CNN-MRI Detection of Fatty Infiltration, Rotator Cuff and Infraspinatus Muscle Atrophy in Shoulder Pain Patients

Half of the global population has or has had shoulder fractures due to routine activities, whether intentional or unintentional. Designing a user-friendly program to input Shoulder fracture images into the model and execute it is a significant problem in the area of Shoulder Fracture Diagnosis Research. The machine is capable of predicting shoulder fractures, but it is unable to anticipate the specific subtypes of fractures that may result from other occurrences or disorders. This research aims to create an innovative Deep Convolution Neural Networks system for accurately predicting the diagnosis of shoulder fractures, in order to facilitate appropriate treatment. Our goal is to provide these services to assist individuals or groups in overcoming the delayed detection of shoulder fractures and eliminating the need for physical diagnosis of shoulder fractures in hospitals. The objective of designing a unique categorizing system is to provide a collection of test case inputs that ensure comprehensive coverage over the test area at a predetermined level. This yields a collection of test cases that prioritize the execution of the feature without considering the specific implementation details.

The effect of screw orientation on internal fixation of Letenneur type II Hoffa fractures: a biomechanics study

BackgroundTo investigate the biomechanical effects of screw orientation and fracture block size on the internal fixation system for Letenneur type II Hoffa fractures.MethodsThe fracture models were randomly divided into six groups according to the fracture subtypes and the direction of nail placement, and a plumb line of the posterior condylar tangent was made across the base of the posterior femoral condyle. The fracture blocks of the three types of fracture were calculated and recorded in the sagittal position, and the biomechanical performance of the six groups was evaluated by biomechanical tests. The axial load on the fracture block at a displacement of 2 mm was set as the failure load, a gradually increasing axial load was applied to each fracture model using a customized indenter at a load of 250-750 N, and the displacements and failure loads of the six groups were recorded at different axial loads.ResultsBiomechanical test results showed that the larger the fracture block, the greater was the stability when nailing from front to back, and the smaller the fracture block, the greater was the strength when nailing from back to front (p < 0.001). As the fracture block became larger, the biomechanical advantage of nailing from posterior to anterior decreased.The displacement under 250 N load were 1.351 ± 0.113 mm, 1.465 ± 0.073 mm for Group IIa AP and Group IIa PA. The displacement under 500 N load were 2.596 ± 0.125 mm, 2.344 ± 0.099 mm for Group IIa AP and Group IIa PA. The displacement under 750 N load were 3.997 ± 0.164, 3.386 ± 0.125 mm for Group IIa AP and Group IIa PA. The failure loads were 384 ± 14 N, 415 ± 19 N for Group IIa AP and Group IIa PA. In the type IIa fracture group, the difference was no longer significant (p > 0.001). Therefore, there is a mechanical threshold that ranges from 38.36 to 52.33% between type IIa and type IIb fractures.ConclusionsThe effect of the nailing direction on the strength of fixation has a fracture-block critical point, which is consistent overall with the trend that the larger the fracture block is, the greater the stability when nailing from anterior to posterior, and the smaller the fracture block is, the greater the strength when nailing from posterior to anterior.

The Surgical Algorithm for the AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification System.

Global cross-sectional survey. To establish a surgical algorithm for sacral fractures based on the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) Spine Sacral Injury Classification System. Although the AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification has been validated across an international audience of surgeons, a consensus on a surgical algorithm for sacral fractures using the Sacral AO Spine Injury Score (Sacral AOSIS) has yet to be developed. A survey was sent to general orthopedic surgeons, orthopedic spine surgeons, and neurosurgeons across the five AO spine regions of the world. Descriptions of controversial sacral injuries based on different fracture subtypes were given, and surgeons were asked whether the patient should undergo operative or nonoperative management. The results of the survey were used to create a surgical algorithm based on each subtype's sacral AOSIS. An international agreement of 70% was decided on by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma experts to indicate a recommendation of initial operative intervention. Using this, sacral fracture subtypes of AOSIS 5 or greater were considered operative, while those with AOSIS 4 or less were generally nonoperative. For subtypes with an AOSIS of 3 or 4, if the sacral fracture was associated with an anterior pelvic ring injury (M3 case-specific modifier), intervention should be left to the surgeons' discretion. The AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification System offers a validated hierarchical system to approach sacral injuries. Through multispecialty and global surgeon input, a surgical algorithm was developed to determine appropriate operative indications for sacral trauma. Further validation is required, but this algorithm provides surgeons across the world with the basis for discussion and the development of standards of care and treatment.