This paper is concerned with the fracture of composite materials containing stress concentrationfeatures such as notches and holes. In particular, it addresses the question of the use of the Theory of CriticalDistances (TCD) – a method which is widely used for predicting notch effects in fatigue and fracture. The TCDmakes use of a length constant, L, known as the critical distance, which is normally assumed to be a materialproperty. However, many workers in the field of composite materials have suggested that the critical distance isnot a constant, but rather is a function of notch size. I examined the evidence for this assertion, and concludedthat it arises for four different reasons, two of which (process zone size and constraint) are real material effectswhilst the other two (choice of test specimen and estimation of the stress field) arise due to errors in making theassessments. From a practical point of view, the assumption of a constant value for L leads to only small errors,so it is recommended for engineering design purposes.