Four-year Event-free Survival Research Articles

ATM germ line pathogenic variants affect outcomes in children with ataxia-telangiectasia and hematological malignancies

AbstractAtaxia-telangiectasia (A-T) is an autosomal-recessive disorder caused by pathogenic variants (PVs) of the ATM gene, predisposing children to hematological malignancies. We investigated their characteristics and outcomes to generate data-based treatment recommendations. In this multinational, observational study we report 202 patients aged ≤25 years with A-T and hematological malignancies from 25 countries. Ninety-one patients (45%) presented with mature B-cell lymphomas, 82 (41%) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, 21 (10%) with Hodgkin lymphoma and 8 (4%) with other hematological malignancies. Four-year overall survival and event-free survival (EFS) were 50.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43.6-59.1) and 47.9% (95% CI 40.8-56.2), respectively. Cure rates have not significantly improved over the last four decades (P = .76). The major cause of treatment failure was treatment-related mortality (TRM) with a four-year cumulative incidence of 25.9% (95% CI, 19.5-32.4). Germ line ATM PVs were categorized as null or hypomorphic and patients with available genetic data (n = 110) were classified as having absent (n = 81) or residual (n = 29) ATM kinase activity. Four-year EFS was 39.4% (95% CI, 29-53.3) vs 78.7% (95% CI, 63.7-97.2), (P < .001), and TRM rates were 37.6% (95% CI, 26.4-48.7) vs 4.0% (95% CI, 0-11.8), (P = .017), for those with absent and residual ATM kinase activity, respectively. Absence of ATM kinase activity was independently associated with decreased EFS (HR = 0.362, 95% CI, 0.16-0.82; P = .009) and increased TRM (hazard ratio [HR] = 14.11, 95% CI, 1.36-146.31; P = .029). Patients with A-T and leukemia/lymphoma may benefit from deescalated therapy for patients with absent ATM kinase activity and near-standard therapy regimens for those with residual kinase activity.

Survival outcomes in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HRNB) in remission after relapsed or refractory treatment receiving eflornithine (DFMO) maintenance.

10060 Background: Five-year overall survival in newly diagnosed HRNB patients is around 50%, with relapse as the primary cause of mortality. While survival for newly diagnosed HRNB has improved with new treatment advances, relapsed or refractory (R/R) patients continue to have poor outcomes, with a high risk of subsequent relapse even among those who achieve remission, underscoring the need for treatments to improve EFS in this group. DFMO has been evaluated as a chemopreventative therapy in a single arm phase 2 study designed to compare Event Free Survival (EFS) and Overall Survival (OS) outcomes with published data for HRNB. The results of patients treated after standard therapy have been previously published. We now present an analysis of EFS/OS for patients with R/R disease, who historically have had a two-year EFS of approximately 10%. Methods: A total of 140 HRNB patients were enrolled, prospectively divided into two strata. S1 included patients in initial remission after upfront therapy, whereas S2 included patients who had either relapsed or had disease refractory to standard induction chemotherapy but achieved remission with additional therapy. Patients received 2 years of continuous treatment with oral DFMO 750 ±250 mg/m2 BID and were followed for up to 7 years. Results: A total of 35 patients withR/R disease who had achieved remission after additional therapy were enrolled onto S2, including 28 patients in remission after one or more prior relapses and 7 refractory patients in remission after subsequent therapies. Of the relapsed patients, 23 had one prior relapse, while 5 patients had two or more relapses prior to enrollment; only one previously relapsed patient had received chemoimmunotherapy prior to enrollment in the study. For the entireS2 cohort, two-year EFS was 46% (95% CI 29%, 61%) with the lower confidence interval above the 10% historical control estimate. Four-year EFS was 46% (95% CI 29%, 61%) and OS 62% (95% CI 44%, 76%), with no relapses occurring after 18 months. For patients enrolled with refractory disease only (n=7) the four-year EFS was 85.7%. In the 28 relapsed patients, the four-year EFS was 35.7%, with single relapse patients (n=23) having an EFS rate of 39.1% and multiple relapsed patients (n=5) 20.0%. Conclusions: Patients in remission after chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory HRNB and treated with DFMO had improved EFS compared to the best historical estimate available at the time of the study. Although the number of patients is too small to support clear conclusions, the subgroup of refractory patients had outcomes that trended better than the relapsed subgroup with an EFS rate that was unexpectedly similar to prior reports of DFMO-treated S1 patients in remission after standard upfront therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02395666 , NCT00026312 .

Radiotherapy for Atypical Teratoid/=Rhabdoid Tumor (ATRT) on the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR).

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (ATRT) of the central nervous system (CNS) are rare tumors with a poor prognosis and variable use of either focal or craniospinal (CSI) radiotherapy (RT). Outcomes on the prospective Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR) were evaluated according to RT delivered. Pediatric patients receiving RT were prospectively enrolled on PPCR to collect initial patient, disease, and treatment factors as well as provide follow-up for patient outcomes. All ATRT patients with evaluable data were included. Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank p-values and cox proportional hazards regression were performed. The PPCR ATRT cohort includes 68 evaluable ATRT patients (median age 2.6years, range 0.71-15.40) from 2012 to 2021. Median follow-up was 40.8months (range 3.4-107.7). Treatment included surgery (65% initial gross total resection or GTR), chemotherapy (60% with myeloablative therapy including stem cell rescue) and RT. For patients with M0 stage (n = 60), 50 (83%) had focal RT and 10 (17%) had CSI. Among patients with M + stage (n = 8), 3 had focal RT and 5 had CSI. Four-year overall survival (OS, n = 68) was 56% with no differences observed between M0 and M + stage patients (p = 0.848). Local Control (LC) at 4years did not show a difference for lower primary dose (50-53.9Gy) compared to ≥ 54Gy (73.3% vs 74.7%, p = 0.83). For patients with M0 disease, four-year OS for focal RT was 54.6% and for CSI was 60% (Hazard Ratio 1.04, p = 0.95. Four-year event free survival (EFS) among M0 patients for focal RT was 45.6% and for CSI was 60% (Hazard Ratio 0.71, p = 0.519). For all patients, the 4-year OS comparing focal RT with CSI was 54.4% vs 60% respectively (p = 0.944), and the 4-year EFS for focal RT or CSI was 42.8% vs 51.4% respectively (p = 0.610). The PPCR ATRT cohort found no differences in outcomes according to receipt of either higher primary dose or larger RT field (CSI). However, most patients were M0 and received focal RT. A lower primary dose (50.4Gy), regardless of patient age, is appealing for further study as part of multi-modality therapy.

Baseline metabolic tumour burden improves risk stratification in Hodgkin lymphoma: A Children's Oncology Group study.

The Children's Oncology Group AHOD0831 study used a positron emission tomography (PET) response-adapted approach in high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma, whereby slow early responders (SERs) received more intensive therapy than rapid early responders (RERs). We explored if baseline PET-based characteristics would improve risk stratification. Of 166 patients enrolled in the COG AHOD0831 study, 94 (57%) had baseline PET scans evaluable for quantitative analysis. For these patients, total body metabolic tumour volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax ) and peak SUV (SUVpeak ) were obtained. MTV/TLG thresholds were an SUV of 2.5 (MTV2.5 /TLG2.5 ) and 40% of the tumour SUVmax (MTV40% /TLG40% ). TLG2.5 was associated with event-free survival (EFS) in the complete cohort (p= 0.04) and in RERs (p= 0.01), but not in SERs (p= 0.8). The Youden index cut-off for TLG2.5 was 1841. Four-year EFS was 92% for RER/TLG2.5 up to 1841, 60% for RER/TLG2.5 greater than 1841, 74% for SER/TLG2.5 up to 1841 and 79% for SER/TLG2.5 greater than 1841. Second EFS for RER/TLG2.5 up to 1841 was 100%. Thus, RERs with a low baseline TLG2.5 experienced excellent EFS with less intensive therapy, whereas RERs with a high baseline TLG2.5 experienced poor EFS. These findings suggest that patients with a high upfront tumour burden may benefit from intensified therapy, even if they achieve a RER.

Matched external control analysis of event-free survival (EFS) in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HRNB) receiving eflornithine (DFMO) maintenance.

10010 Background: Long term survival in HRNB patients remains a challenge with relapse as the primary cause of mortality. DFMO has been evaluated as a chemopreventative therapy in a single arm study designed to compare EFS outcomes with published rates for the Phase 3 Children’s Oncology Group ch14.18 immunotherapy trial, ANBL0032. In order to address the limitations associated with comparison to a historical control group, we used ANBL0032 patient-level data and propensity-score matching (PSM) to simulate a randomized study comparing EFS of patients treated with DFMO after ch14.18 (treated) to ANBL0032 patients who did not subsequently receive DFMO (control). Methods: A phase 2 trial enrolled a total of 140 HRNB patients in remission at the completion of disease treatment from 2012 to 2016. Patients received 2 years of continuous treatment with DFMO 750 ±250 mg/m2 BID and were followed for up to 7 years. ANBL0032 enrolled a total of 1328 HRNB patients from 2001 to 2015 who were assigned to treatment with ch14.18 immunotherapy and followed for up to 10 years. With FDA input, we defined selection rules to identify like groups of treated and control patients eligible for matching, covariates of potential prognostic importance, and matching algorithm details. PSM was used to balance cohorts on their baseline demographic and characteristics, matching each treated patient with the 3 most closely scored control patients with an exact match on MYCN. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses were used to compare EFS (primary) and overall survival (OS) (key secondary) endpoints. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed to further investigate the primary comparison. Results: A total of 92 treated patients and 852 control patients met selection criteria, with 91 and 516, respectively, having complete covariate data required for the analysis. Eighty-seven (94.6%) of the treated group had verified participation in ANBL0032 immediately prior to enrollment in the DFMO trial. EFS from end of immunotherapy was significantly improved in the matched DFMO group (n=90) vs. control group (n=270), with a hazard ratio of 0.48 (95% CI: 0.27, 0.85) and a p-value of 0.0114. Four-year EFS was 84.4% (95% CI 75.2, 90.5) in the DFMO group versus 72.8% (95% CI 67.0, 77.7) in the control group. OS rates were also higher for DFMO group in the matched population, with a hazard ratio of 0.36 (95% CI: 0.16, 0.79) and a p-value of 0.0105. EFS sensitivity analyses demonstrated consistent results, including those challenging selection criteria for the control population. Conclusions: Patients in remission after standard upfront therapy treated with DFMO had approximately half the risk of relapse compared to matched control patients. The PSM comparisons represent the most statistically robust findings to date supporting the benefit of DFMO as a maintenance treatment for HRNB. Clinical trial information: NCT02395666, NCT00026312.

Optimal Duration of Neoadjuvant Taxane and Carboplatin Combined With Anti-HER2 Targeted Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

BackgroundTaxane, carboplatin and trastuzumab (TCH) is an effective neoadjuvant regimen for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer with high pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The KATHERINE trial changes the outlook for high-risk HER2-positive breast cancer, which suggests that escalation treatment for patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy may improve survival. The major objective of this study was to investigate the fewest cycles of neoadjuvant TCH therapy needed to screen out non-pCR patients.MethodsThis retrospective study included patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who received either four or six cycles of TCH preoperatively at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between 2008 and 2019. The pCR status was evaluated, and relevant factors associated with pCR were identified using univariate and multivariable analyses. The pathological results of core needle biopsy (CNB) in the breast tumor after two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were also collected. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to estimate the event-free survival (EFS).ResultsOf 758 eligible patients, 303 were included and analyzed in the four-cycle group and 455 in the six-cycle group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the pCR rate (46.5% [95% CI 40.9% - 52.2%] in the four-cycle group and 49.9% [95% CI 45.3% - 54.5%] in the six-cycle group, p = 0.365) or the four-year EFS (90.8% in four-cycle group and 93.8% in six-cycle group; p = 0.264). Multivariable analysis indicated that a negative hormone receptor status and the weekly paclitaxel were independent factors for predicting pCR. After adjusting for factors in the multivariable analysis, there was still no significant difference between four and six cycles of neoadjuvant TCH (OR = 1.252, 95% CI 0.904 - 1.733, p = 0.176). Furthermore, 17.9% patients with invasive carcinoma on CNB after two cycles of TCH ultimately achieved pCR in the breast after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment.ConclusionFour cycles of taxane/carboplatin-based neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy may be applied as an optimal treatment duration for screening high-risk HER2-positive breast cancer patients for escalation treatment. Further prospective study is warranted.

Efficacy of High-Dose Chemotherapy and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation for Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumor: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group Trial ACNS0333.

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) is an aggressive, early-childhood brain tumor without standard effective treatment. To our knowledge, we conducted the first AT/RT-specific cooperative group trial, ACNS0333, to examine the efficacy and safety of intensive postoperative chemotherapy and focal radiation to treat AT/RT. Patients from birth to 22 years of age with AT/RT were eligible. After surgery, they received 2 courses of multiagent chemotherapy, followed by 3 courses of high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell rescue and involved-field radiation therapy. Timing of radiation was based on patient age and disease location and extent. Central testing of tumor and blood for SMARCB1 status was mandated. Tumor molecular subclassification was performed retrospectively. The primary analysis was event-free survival (EFS) for patients < 36 months of age compared with a cooperative groups' historical cohort. Although accrual was based on the therapeutic question, potential prognostic factors, including age, tumor location, M stage, surgical resection, order of therapy, germline status, and molecular subtype, were explored. Of 65 evaluable patients, 54 were < 36 months of age. ACNS0333 therapy significantly reduced the risk of EFS events in patients < 36 months of age compared with the historical cohort (P < .0005; hazard rate, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.66). Four-year EFS and overall survival for the entire cohort were 37% (95% CI, 25% to 49%) and 43% (95% CI, 31% to 55%), respectively. Timing of radiation did not affect survival, and 91% of relapses occurred by 2 years from enrollment. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 4 patients. The ACNS0333 regimen dramatically improved survival compared with historical therapies for patients with AT/RT. Clinical characteristics and molecular subgrouping suggest prognostic differences. ACNS0333 results lay a foundation on which to build future studies and incorporate testing of new therapeutic agents.

Prognostic impact of t(16;21)(p11;q22) and t(16;21)(q24;q22) in pediatric AML: a retrospective study by the I-BFM Study Group

AbstractTo study the prognostic relevance of rare genetic aberrations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), such as t(16;21), international collaboration is required. Two different types of t(16;21) translocations can be distinguished: t(16;21)(p11;q22), resulting in the FUS-ERG fusion gene; and t(16;21)(q24;q22), resulting in RUNX1-core binding factor (CBFA2T3). We collected data on clinical and biological characteristics of 54 pediatric AML cases with t(16;21) rearrangements from 14 international collaborative study groups participating in the international Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (I-BFM) AML study group. The AML-BFM cohort diagnosed between 1997 and 2013 was used as a reference cohort. RUNX1-CBFA2T3 (n = 23) had significantly lower median white blood cell count (12.5 × 109/L, P = .03) compared with the reference cohort. FUS-ERG rearranged AML (n = 31) had no predominant French-American-British (FAB) type, whereas 76% of RUNX1-CBFA2T3 had an M1/M2 FAB type (M1, M2), significantly different from the reference cohort (P = .004). Four-year event-free survival (EFS) of patients with FUS-ERG was 7% (standard error [SE] = 5%), significantly lower compared with the reference cohort (51%, SE = 1%, P < .001). Four-year EFS of RUNX1-CBFA2T3 was 77% (SE = 8%, P = .06), significantly higher compared with the reference cohort. Cumulative incidence of relapse was 74% (SE = 8%) in FUS-ERG, 0% (SE = 0%) in RUNX1-CBFA2T3, compared with 32% (SE = 1%) in the reference cohort (P < .001). Multivariate analysis identified both FUS-ERG and RUNX1-CBFA2T3 as independent risk factors with hazard ratios of 1.9 (P < .0001) and 0.3 (P = .025), respectively. These results describe 2 clinically relevant distinct subtypes of pediatric AML. Similarly to other core-binding factor AMLs, patients with RUNX1-CBFA2T3 rearranged AML may benefit from stratification in the standard risk treatment, whereas patients with FUS-ERG rearranged AML should be considered high-risk.

Outcomes in Treatment-Naïve Patients With Metastatic Extremity Osteosarcoma Treated With OGS-12, a Novel Non-High-Dose Methotrexate-Based, Dose-Dense Combination Chemotherapy, in a Tertiary Care Cancer Center.

PurposeMetastatic osteosarcoma is largely treated with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX)–based therapy, especially in the pediatric population. This mandates complex pharmacokinetic monitoring in a costly inpatient setting to mitigate unpredictable serious toxicities. Hence, a non-HDMTX–based regimen is worth exploring, especially in India and low- and middle-income countries.Materials and MethodsAll consecutive treatment-naïve patients with metastatic osteosarcoma were prospectively treated on the novel OGS-12 protocol consisting of sequential doublets of doxorubicin, cisplatin, and ifosfamide. Four cycles were administered as neoadjuvant therapy followed by planned curative intent surgery and metastasectomy when feasible, followed by four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Baseline characteristics, histologic response, event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity data were prospectively collected.ResultsThree hundred seventeen patients were enrolled onto the OGS-12 protocol from 2011 to 2014, of whom 80 (25%) had metastatic disease; median age was 17 years. The majority of patients were nutritionally challenged with high-risk features. At presentation, 83% of patients (66 patients) had lung metastases. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 57% of patients were histologically good responders. Four-year EFS and OS rates were 24% and 27%, respectively, in the intent-to-treat population and 27% and 29%, respectively, in the per-protocol analysis. Significant grade 3 or 4 toxicities were febrile neutropenia (51%), thrombocytopenia (36%), and anemia (54%). Histologic response was an independent predictor for EFS and OS in patients who underwent surgery. Surgical intervention was found to be significant for survival in univariable analysis.ConclusionThe novel, low-cost, non-HDMTX–based, dose-dense OGS-12 regimen has shown comparable outcomes to international standards in metastatic osteosarcomas and is worthy of wider clinical application. An aggressive multimodality approach may result in long-term survival in a select group of patients and, hence, is worth considering.

Childhood Hodgkin International Prognostic Score (CHIPS) Predicts event-free survival in Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Early response to initial chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) measured by computed tomography (CT) and/or positron emission tomography (PET) after two to three cycles of chemotherapy may inform therapeutic decisions. Risk stratification at diagnosis could, however, allow earlier and potentially more efficacious treatment modifications. We developed a predictive model for event-free survival (EFS) in pediatric/adolescent HL using clinical data known at diagnosis from 1103 intermediate-risk HL patients treated on Children's Oncology Group protocol AHOD0031 with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, cyclophosphamide (ABVE-PC) chemotherapy and radiation. Independent predictors of EFS were identified and used to develop and validate a prognostic score (Childhood Hodgkin International Prognostic Score [CHIPS]). A training cohort was randomly selected to include approximately half of the overall cohort, with the remainder forming the validation cohort. Stage 4 disease, large mediastinal mass, albumin (<3.5), and fever were independent predictors of EFS that were each assigned one point in the CHIPS. Four-year EFS was 93.1% for patients with CHIPS = 0, 88.5% for patients with CHIPS = 1, 77.6% for patients with CHIPS = 2, and 69.2% for patients with CHIPS = 3. CHIPS was highly predictive of EFS, identifying a subset (with CHIPS 2 or 3) that comprises 27% of intermediate-risk patients who have a 4-year EFS of <80% and who may benefit from early therapeutic augmentation. Furthermore, CHIPS identified higher risk patients who were not identified by early PET or CT response. CHIPS is a robust and inexpensive approach to predicting risk in patients with intermediate-risk HL that may improve ability to tailor therapy to risk factors known at diagnosis.

Intrachromosomal Amplification of Chromosome 21 Is Associated With Inferior Outcomes in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated in Contemporary Standard-Risk Children's Oncology Group Studies: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

Five-year overall survival (OS) for children with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) exceeds 90% with risk-adapted therapy. Age, initial WBC count, genetic aberrations, and minimal residual disease (MRD) are used for risk stratification. Intrachromosomal amplification of a region of chromosome 21 (iAMP21; three or more extra copies of RUNX1 on an abnormal chromosome 21) is a recently identified recurrent genomic lesion associated with inferior outcome in some studies. We investigated the impact of iAMP21 in a large cohort treated in contemporary Children's Oncology Group (COG) ALL trials. Fluorescent in situ hybridization for specific genetic aberrations was required at diagnosis. MRD was measured by flow cytometry at end induction. Outcome was measured as event-free survival (EFS) and OS. iAMP21 was found in 158 (2%) of 7,793 patients with B-ALL age ≥ 1 year; 74 (1.5%) of 5,057 standard-risk (SR) patients, and 84 (3.1%) of 2,736 high-risk (HR) patients. iAMP21 was associated with age ≥ 10 years, WBC less than 50,000/μL, female sex, and detectable MRD at day 29. Four-year EFS and OS were significantly worse for patients with iAMP21 and SR B-ALL, but iAMP21 was not a statistically significant prognostic factor in HR patients. There was no interaction between MRD and iAMP21. Among SR patients, day 29 MRD ≥ 0.01% and iAMP21 were associated with the poorest EFS and OS; absence of both was associated with the best outcome. iAMP21 is associated with inferior outcome in pediatric B-ALL, particularly SR patients who require more intensive therapy and are now treated on HR COG ALL protocols.

Outcome for metastatic (M+) medulloblastoma (MB) treated with carboplatin during craniospinal radiotherapy (CSRT) followed by cyclophosphamide (CPM) and vincristine (VCR): Preliminary results of COG 99701

2017 Background: The outcome for patients with metastatic medulloblastoma has historically been poor. Carboplatin is both a potent radiosensitizer and has activity against medulloblastoma. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of administering carboplatin during CSRT and the impact of anaplasia as an independent predictor of outcome. Methods: All patients underwent surgical debulking followed by 36 Gy CSRT with boosts to the posterior fossa and sites of bulk disease. During CSRT, patients received weekly VCR as well as carboplatin doses ranging from 30 mg/m2/dose x 15 to 45 mg/m2/dose x 30 given 1–4 hours prior to each RT fraction, using a Phase I design. G-CSF was given for neutropenia during CSRT. Six weeks after completing chemoradiotherapy, patients received six courses of monthly CPM (2 gm/m2) and VCR. Central pathology review was performed to confirm the diagnosis and assess for anaplasia. Results: 57 patients (median age 7.3 yrs, range 3.1–18.1 years, M/F ratio of 2.6:1) with centrally reviewed M+ MB were enrolled. Thrombocytopenia was dose limiting and 35 mg/m2/dose x 30 was selected as the maximum tolerated carboplatin dose. 20 patients (35%) had severe anaplasia. There was no difference in age, M/F ratio or distribution of M-stage between those with or without anaplasia. Median follow-up for surviving patients is 4.5 yrs. Four-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) for the entire group is 81 ± 5% and 66 ± 6%. Four-year OS is 89 ± 5% for patients without anaplasia vs. 65 ± 11% for those with anaplasia (log-rank p=0.002). Four-year EFS is 76 ± 7% for patients without anaplasia vs. 48 ± 12% for those with anaplasia (log-rank p=0.02). There was no difference in survival based on M-stage. Conclusions: The use of daily carboplatin as a radiosensitizer appears to be a promising strategy for patients with metastatic MB. The presence of anaplasia is a significant negative predictor of outcome. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Treatment of Anaplastic Histology Wilms' Tumor: Results From the Fifth National Wilms' Tumor Study

An objective of the fifth National Wilms' Tumor Study (NWTS-5) was to evaluate the efficacy of treatment regimens for anaplastic histology Wilms' tumor (AH). Prospective single-arm studies were conducted. Patients with stage I AH were treated with vincristine and dactinomycin for 18 weeks. Patients with stages II to IV diffuse AH were treated with vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide for 24 weeks plus flank/abdominal radiation. A total of 2,596 patients with Wilms' tumor were enrolled onto NWTS-5, of whom 281 (10.8%) had AH. Four-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates for assessable patients with stage I AH (n = 29) were 69.5% (95% CI, 46.9 to 84.0) and 82.6% (95% CI, 63.1 to 92.4). In comparison, 4-year EFS and OS estimates for patients with stage I favorable histology (FH; n = 473) were 92.4% (95% CI, 89.5 to 94.5) and 98.3% (95% CI, 96.4 to 99.2). Four-year EFS estimates for patients who underwent immediate nephrectomy with stages II (n = 23), III (n = 43), and IV (n = 15) diffuse AH were 82.6% (95% CI, 60.1 to 93.1), 64.7% (95% CI, 48.3 to 77.7), and 33.3% (95% CI, 12.2 to 56.4), respectively. OS was similar to EFS for these groups. There were no local recurrences among patients with stage II AH. Four-year EFS and OS estimates for patients with bilateral AH (n = 29) were 43.8% (95% CI, 24.2 to 61.8) and 55.2% (95% CI, 34.8 to 71.7), respectively. The prognosis for patients with stage I AH is worse than that for patients with stage I FH. Novel treatment strategies are needed to improve outcomes for patients with AH, especially those with stage III to V disease.

Varying intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a randomized trial in patients less than or equal to 65 years old (median, 44 years) to determine whether increasing the intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) would improve the outcome. After uniform induction therapy, patients in complete remission (CR) who were less than 41 years old and who had a histocompatible sibling underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) (54 patients). The remainder of patients in CR were randomized to receive either 2 years of continuous outpatient maintenance therapy with cytarabine and 6- thioguanine (83 patients) or a single course of inpatient consolidation therapy consisting of 6 days of high-dose cytarabine plus 3 days of amsacrine (87 patients). The median duration of follow-up is now 4 years, and patients are included in the analyses of outcome regardless of whether they relapsed before starting the intended treatment. Four- year event-free survival (EFS) was 27% +/- 10% for consolidation therapy versus 16% +/- 8% for maintenance therapy (P = .068) and 28% +/- 11% versus 15% +/- 9% (P = .047) in patients less than 60 years old. The outcome for patients receiving alloBMT was compared with the subset of patients less than 41 years old who received consolidation therapy (N = 29) or maintenance therapy (N = 21). Four-year EFS was 42% +/- 13% for alloBMT, 30% +/- 17% for consolidation therapy, and 14% +/- 15% for maintenance therapy. AlloBMT had a significantly better EFS (P = .013) than maintenance therapy, but was not different from consolidation therapy. In patients less than 41 years old, 4-year survival after alloBMT (42% +/- 14%) did not differ from consolidation therapy (43% +/- 18%), but both were significantly better than maintenance therapy (19% +/- 17%), P = .047 and .043, respectively. The mortality rate for maintenance therapy was 0%, consolidation therapy, 21%; and alloBMT, 36%. Consolidation therapy caused an especially high mortality rate in the patients greater than or equal to 60 years old (8 of 14 or 57%). The toxicity of combined high-dose cytarabine and amsacrine is unacceptable, especially in older patients, and alternative approaches to consolidation therapy such as high-dose cytarabine alone need to be tested. In AML, a single course of consolidation therapy or alloBMT after initial CR produces better results than lengthy maintenance therapy. Although EFS and survival of alloBMT and consolidation therapy do not differ significantly, a larger number of patients need to be studied before concluding that they are equivalent.

Varying Intensity of Postremission Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a randomized trial in patients less than or equal to 65 years old (median, 44 years) to determine whether increasing the intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) would improve the outcome. After uniform induction therapy, patients in complete remission (CR) who were less than 41 years old and who had a histocompatible sibling underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) (54 patients). The remainder of patients in CR were randomized to receive either 2 years of continuous outpatient maintenance therapy with cytarabine and 6-thioguanine (83 patients) or a single course of inpatient consolidation therapy consisting of 6 days of high-dose cytarabine plus 3 days of amsacrine (87 patients). The median duration of follow-up is now 4 years, and patients are included in the analyses of outcome regardless of whether they relapsed before starting the intended treatment. Four-year event-free survival (EFS) was 27% +/- 10% for consolidation therapy versus 16% +/- 8% for maintenance therapy (P = .068) and 28% +/- 11% versus 15% +/- 9% (P = .047) in patients less than 60 years old. The outcome for patients receiving alloBMT was compared with the subset of patients less than 41 years old who received consolidation therapy (N = 29) or maintenance therapy (N = 21). Four-year EFS was 42% +/- 13% for alloBMT, 30% +/- 17% for consolidation therapy, and 14% +/- 15% for maintenance therapy. AlloBMT had a significantly better EFS (P = .013) than maintenance therapy, but was not different from consolidation therapy. In patients less than 41 years old, 4-year survival after alloBMT (42% +/- 14%) did not differ from consolidation therapy (43% +/- 18%), but both were significantly better than maintenance therapy (19% +/- 17%), P = .047 and .043, respectively. The mortality rate for maintenance therapy was 0%, consolidation therapy, 21%; and alloBMT, 36%. Consolidation therapy caused an especially high mortality rate in the patients greater than or equal to 60 years old (8 of 14 or 57%). The toxicity of combined high-dose cytarabine and amsacrine is unacceptable, especially in older patients, and alternative approaches to consolidation therapy such as high-dose cytarabine alone need to be tested. In AML, a single course of consolidation therapy or alloBMT after initial CR produces better results than lengthy maintenance therapy. Although EFS and survival of alloBMT and consolidation therapy do not differ significantly, a larger number of patients need to be studied before concluding that they are equivalent.