Four-corner Arthrodesis Research Articles

Clinical efficacy of Ni-Ti memory alloy four-corner arthrodesis concentrator in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse: a follow-up of over 10 years.

Exploring the therapeutic effects of Ni-Ti shape memory alloy four-corner arthrodesis concentrator (NT-FCAC) in treating scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) and providing a decade-long follow-up report. Twenty-six patients with SNAC underwent scaphoidectomy, along with four-corner arthrodesis fusion involving the capitate, lunate, triquetrum, and hamate, using NT-MFCAC. Grip strength was measured using a Jamar dynamometer, while wrist joint mobility was assessed using a goniometer. Preoperative and postoperative assessments were conducted using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) questionnaire to monitor limb functionality restoration. Pain levels at the wrist joint were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS). Postoperative wrist bone fusion status was assessed through anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the wrist joint. After a 3-month postoperative period, all 26 patients exhibited osseous union at the wrist joint. Over a follow-up spanning 10-15 years, no severe postoperative complications were observed in any patient. Grip strength in the affected side of all patients recovered to 81.96% compared to the healthy side, while wrist joint mobility in the affected side reached over 60% of the healthy side's functionality. VAS scores decreased significantly from 5.85 ± 0.73 preoperatively to 0.19 ± 0.40 at the final follow-up; Quick DASH scores reduced from 69.88 ± 5.12 preoperatively to 6.30 ± 1.25 at final follow-up. Statistically significant differences were noted in VAS and Quick DASH scores for all patients (p < 0.05). However, beyond 60 months postoperatively, subsequent follow-ups did not yield statistically significant differences in VAS and Quick DASH scores for all patients (p > 0.05). Utilizing NT-FCAC for SNAC treated with four-corner arthrodesis fusion results in a high rate of wrist bone fusion, preserving a significant portion of wrist joint function and exhibiting favorable long-term outcomes. This approach is suitable for treating patients with SNAC requiring four-corner arthrodesis fusion.

Proximal row carpectomy or scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis for treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse arthritis.

Degenerative wrist conditions, such as scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, often require salvage procedures to reduce pain and improve function. For early stages of disease, both proximal row carpectomy and scaphoid excision four-corner arthrodesis are viable motion-preserving options. There remains controversy on which technique is superior. Selection is a nuanced decision that requires consideration of patient characteristics and stage of disease. The traditional notion that proximal row carpectomy should be reserved for older individuals with low demands has been challenged; long-term studies in younger populations demonstrate similar patient-reported outcomes, pain relief and survivorship without conversion to total wrist arthrodesis between proximal row carpectomy and four-corner arthrodesis. The existing evidence suggests proximal row carpectomy has advantages of greater range of motion, fewer complications and lower costs. Advancements such as arthroscopic techniques for both procedures show potential, although mastery involves a steep learning curve.

Evaluating inter- and intraobserver reliability in radiographic determination of wrist alignment following scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis

BackgroundFour-corner arthrodesis is commonly performed for advanced collapse patterns of wrist arthritis. Reduction of the capitolunate (CL) angle during four-corner fusion is crucial to allow for the greatest radiocarpal joint arc of motion. Previous studies demonstrate variable inter- and intraobserver reliability of measuring the CL angle. However, in a four-corner fusion, hardware implementation and scaphoid excision can complicate carpal alignment measurements. The purpose of this study is to investigate inter- and intraobserver reliability of measuring carpal alignment parameters following scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis. MethodsThree fellowship-trained orthopaedic hand surgeons evaluated 30 posteroanterior and lateral radiographs of wrists after scaphoid excision and four-corner fusion. Radiographic evaluation included analysis of the radiolunate angle (RL), CL angle, lunate posture, carpal height, carpal height ratio, hardware impingement, and arthrodesis technique. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and kappa values were used to evaluate reliability of radiographic measurements. ResultsRL and CL angles demonstrated very good inter- (ICCs: 0.657 and 0.693, respectively) and intraobserver agreement (ICCs: 0.576 to 0.924 and 0.596 to 0.811, respectively). Hardware impingement metrics by dorsal prominence and radiocarpal prominence had excellent interobserver reliability of 0.821 and 0.803, respectively. ICC values for arthrodesis technique were equal to 1.00. The inter- and intraobserver ICC values for the number of screws/staples used were in excellent agreement ranging from 0.910 to 1.000. ConclusionsOur study demonstrated favorable intra- and interobserver reliability at assessing carpal alignment following scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis and these metrics potentially could be used in future research to evaluate long-term surgical outcomes. Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective cohort study.

Proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis: a retrospective comparative study.

Four-corner arthrodesis with scaphoid excision (FCA) and proximal row carpal resection (PRC) are frequently performed in wrists with post-traumatic Scaphoid Non- Union Advanced Collapse (SNAC)/Scapho-Lunate Advanced Collapse (SLAC) osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of these two procedures. This single-center, retrospective cohort study included all patients who had PRC or FCA between January 1st, 2009 and January 1st, 2019 and who were followed up. Follow-up included: mobility (radial deviation, ulnar deviation, flexion, extension), strength (grip test, pinch test), function (QuickDash, patient-rated wrist evaluation [PRWE]), subjective mobility, and global satisfaction scores. Among 25 patients included, 11 had PRC and 14 had FCA with a mean follow-up of 69.5 months [12-132]. Radial deviation was 18° versus 14° (p = 0.7), ulnar deviation was 21° versus 22° (p = 0.15), flexion was 39° versus 30° (p = 0.32), extension was 32.5° versus 29.5° (p = 0.09), grip test compared to the controlateral side was 72% versus 62% (p = 0.53), Quick Dash score was 12.5 versus 17.6 (p = 0.84), PRWE was 18.7 versus 17.6 (p = 0.38), subjective mobility was 7.8 versus 7.5 (p = 0.23), and satisfaction score was 8.7 versus 9 (p = 0.76), respectively, in the FCA group and the PRC group. Re-operation rates were 14% patients in the FCA group and 0% in the PRC group. This study found no significant difference between FCA and PRC on strength, mobility, and function in patients with post-traumatic SLAC or SNAC stage II wrist arthritis. Both FCA and PRC seem to be reliable surgical techniques with good outcomes with more revision in the FCA group.

Age Considerations in Four-Corner Arthrodesis and Proximal Row Carpectomy: A Review

Abstract Purpose Although indications for four-corner arthrodesis (4CA) and proximal row carpectomy (PRC) are not completely aligned, the surgeon is often tasked with deciding between these options which vary in the surgical technique and complication profile. Patient age is often discussed as a determining factor for treatment; however, outcome data for these procedures are rarely stratified by patient age. Our objective was to perform a systematic review on the age-specific outcomes for 4CA and PRC. Methods A PubMed database search for 4CA and PRC was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. The inclusion criteria required individual case reporting of patient age, surgical intervention, and appropriate outcome measures. The data were stratified by procedure and by patients older and younger than 45 years. Results Within the 4CA group, the relative risk for a disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score above 30 was 1.94 (95% confidence interval, 1.1–3.67) in patients over 45 years compared with patients under 45 years. Within the PRC group, grip strength as a percentage of the contralateral side was higher in the over 45 age group (mean 75%) compared to the under 45 age group (mean 61%) but did not reach the level of significance. Conclusion Despite satisfactory results for 4CA in aggregate, the distribution of scores indicates the need for setting expectations when treating younger adult patients with 4CA. The current results demonstrate increased disability based on DASH score following 4CA in patients under 45 years compared with patients over 45 years. Although outcomes were comparable between younger and older adults following PRC, recovery of grip strength may occur less frequently in younger adults. Level of evidence IV systematic review.

A Comparison of Rib Osteochondral Graft to Medial Femoral Trochlear Osteocartilaginous Graft for the Salvage of the Fragmented Scaphoid Proximal Pole: A Single-Center Experience with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

Purpose Fragmented fractures of the proximal pole of the scaphoid that cannot be internally fixed may be salvaged by four-corner arthrodesis or proximal row carpectomy. Replacement of the proximal scaphoid with costal-osteochondral graft (COG) or the medial femoral trochlea (MFT) graft are two alternative solutions for this clinical presentation. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of the COG and the MFT graft with a minimum 2-year follow-up from a single centre. Methods A retrospective study was performed to investigate the outcome of COG and MFT with a minimum 2 year follow up. Demographic data and clinical assessment including wrist range of motion and grip strength measurements and Oxford Knee score were collected. Patients completed the outcome measures of Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and a ten-point visual analogue score for pain (VAS). Radiological examination was performed on all wrists at follow-up. Results The visual analogue score, DASH and PRWE were similar between the two groups. There was radiographic evidence of arthritis between the radial styloid and distal scaphoid in all patients that underwent COG but no evidence in those that underwent MFT graft reconstruction. There were different complications in each group. Thirty percent of patients that underwent MFT reconstruction had persistent knee pain at follow up. Conclusion Though there are notable differences in the follow-up period, patients undergoing MFT risk developing knee pain, while those undergoing COG risk radiographic progression of wrist arthritis. Level of Evidence III - Comparative study.

Proximal ROw carpectOmy versus four-corner Fusion (PROOF-trial) for osteoarthritis of the wrist: study protocol for multi-institutional double-blinded randomized controlled trial

BackgroundScapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid non-union advanced collapse (SNAC) are common types of wrist osteoarthritis (OA). Non-operative treatment consists of pain medication, splinting, and avoiding activities that induce pain. However, in case a course of conservative treatment is unsuccessful, operative treatment is needed. The two most conventional operative approaches for SLAC/SNAC OA are four-corner arthrodesis (FCA) and proximal row carpectomy (PRC). Although FCA is the gold-standard operative technique and may lead to superior grip strength, the evident benefit of PRC is that it obviates any need for hardware removal and controlling for bony union. To date, no high-quality randomized controlled trial comparing FCA and PRC exists. As clinical outcomes seem comparable, a trial that assesses patient-reported outcomes, adverse events, and secondary operations may guide clinical decision making between these two procedures. Thus, the aim of this multi-institutional double-blind randomized controlled trial is to study whether PRC is non-inferior to FCA in treating SLAC/SNAC OA. We hypothesize that PRC is non-inferior to FCA with lower economic expanses.MethodsThe trial is designed as a randomized, controlled, patient- and outcome-assessor blinded multicenter, two-armed 1:1 non-inferiority trial. Patients with SLAC/SNAC-induced wrist pain meeting trial inclusion criteria will undergo wrist arthroscopy to further assess eligibility. Each patient eligible for the trial will be randomly assigned to undergo either FCA or PRC. The primary endpoint of this study is the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) at 1-year after FCA versus PRC. Secondary outcomes include Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, EQ-5D-5L, pain, grip strength, wrist active range of motion, radiographic evaluation, and adverse events. Trial design, methods, and statistical analysis plan will be presented here.DiscussionWe present an RCT design comparing FCA vs PRC for SLAC/SNAC-induced OA. The results of this trial will assist in decision making when planning surgery for SLAC/SNAC.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04260165. Registered February 7, 2020.

Wrist &amp; Hand

The August 2023 Wrist &amp; Hand Roundup360 looks at: Complications and patient-reported outcomes after trapeziectomy with a Weilby sling: a cohort study; Swelling, stiffness, and dysfunction following proximal interphalangeal joint sprains; Utility of preoperative MRI for assessing proximal fragment vascularity in scaphoid nonunion; Complications and outcomes of operative treatment for acute perilunate injuries: a systematic review; The position of the median nerve in relation to the palmaris longus tendon at the wrist: a study of 784 MR images; Basal fractures of the ulnar styloid? A randomized controlled trial; Proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis in SLAC and SNAC wrist; Managing cold intolerance after hand injury: a systematic review.

FOUR-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY-DERIVED RADIOLUNATE ARTHROKINEMATICS WITH A CASE STUDY IN FOUR-CORNER ARTHRODESIS

The radiocarpal joint, which includes articulations between the radius and the proximal carpal row, transmits force through the central column of the wrist. Chronic disruptions to radiocarpal biomechanics are associated with the development of scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) pattern OA. While the radiolunate joint is thought to be typically spared in SLAC progression, degenerative changes can present on the proximal lunate. An investigation of radiolunate arthrokinematics may improve understanding of posttraumatic and postsurgical outcomes, including salvage procedures for SLAC wrist such as scaphoid excision with four-corner arthrodesis (SEFCA). Four-dimensional CT, which captures CT volumes over time or motion, has enhanced our ability to quantify arthrokinematics during functional tasks. We hypothesize that 4DCT-derived radiolunate arthrokinematics during flexion-extension and radioulnar deviation will differ between healthy, uninjured wrists and a wrist three years post-SEFCA. Data were collected from the uninjured wrists of ten participants enrolled in a prospective study of unilateral wrist injury and one participant following SEFCA (n=11, 36% female). The SEFCA arthrodesis was fixed using Kirschner wires prepositioned in the head of the capitate and subsequently advanced into the lunate. Included participants were aged between 18 and 60 years; exclusion criteria included history of injury, surgery, or congenital variant in the contralateral wrist; rheumatologic disease; or connective tissue disease. Static-neutral and dynamic CT data were collected using a dual-source scanner (SOMATOM Flash, Siemens, DE) and commercially-available cardiac sequential scan protocol. 4DCT data were collected over a 1.5-second period as signaled by an ECG simulator. CT volumes were collected at a temporal resolution of 66 ms as participants moved at a cadence of 70 beats per minute (voxel size: 0.234mm × 0.234mm × 0.600mm). Nearest mesh-vertex distances between vertices on the radius and lunate within distance (2.5 mm) and surface-normal angular (60°) thresholds were calculated to define interosseous proximity distributions. Median interosseous proximities at each time point were calculated. Ten participants were aged mean (SD) 30.3 (6.8) years at the time of imaging; the SEFCA participant was 52 years of age and three years postoperative. Median radiolunate interosseous proximities are presented during flexion-extension and radioulnar deviation (Fig. 1). 4DCT has advanced our understanding of wrist arthrokinematics during functional tasks. The current study reveals that radiolunate interosseous proximities in healthy, uninjured wrists remain relatively constant over wrist flexion-extension and radioulnar deviation, with greatest proximities occurring near the extrema of motion. In the SEFCA participant, interosseous proximities were closest in flexion and ulnar deviation; this may be associated with high articular contact pressures in these positions. Interosseous proximities reveal how restricting midcarpal motion in SEFCA impacts adjacent articulations during wrist motion. This study represents a novel use of 4DCT to assess post-arthrodesis outcomes.

Arthroscopic Management of the Hamate Proximal Pole Arthrosis.

In this retrospective study, all patients with arthrosis of the proximal pole of the hamate encountered in a 10-year period treated with arthroscopy were reviewed. Patient demographics, arthroscopic details, associated injuries, and procedures were reviewed. Functional and patient-reported clinical outcomes after arthroscopic osteochondroplasty were analyzed. An analysis of 39 patients who underwent arthroscopic osteochondroplasty showed a type II lunate prevalence of 87.2%. On wrist arthroscopy, a triangular fibrocartilaginous complex tear was the most common diagnosis (64.1%), followed by scapholunate ligament tear (61.5%) and lunotriquetral ligament tear (35.9%). All patients were managed arthroscopically with 100% procedural success. Average follow-up of 42.8 ± 37.7 months showed statistically significant improvements in the visual analog score and Mayo wrist score postoperatively (P < 0.01). Three patients (7.7%) failed the procedure at a mean of 23 ± 31.4 months. Risk factors for salvage operations were nondominant wrist involvement 100% (P = 0.04), lunotriquetral ligament injury 100% (P = 0.04), the absence of triangular fibrocartilaginous complex injury 100% (P = 0.04), and the presence of scapholunate advanced collapse 100% (P < 0.01). Wrist arthroscopy is valuable for accurately diagnosing and treating hamate arthrosis and identifying a wide variety of pathologies associated. This study showed arthroscopic osteochondroplasty produced satisfactory clinical results. Furthermore, the presence of scapholunate advanced collapse wrist offers its prognostic value in determining treatment failure.

Four-Corner Arthrodesis with a Dorsal Locking PEEK Plate: A Retrospective Case Series.

Background Four-corner arthrodesis (4CA) can be performed with a variety of methods. To our knowledge, fewer than 125 cases of 4CA with a locking polyether ether ketone (PEEK) plate have been reported, necessitating further study. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic union rate and clinical outcomes in a series of patients who received 4CA with a locking PEEK plate. Methods We re-examined 39 wrists in 37 patients at a mean follow-up of 50 months (median: 52 months, range: 6-128). Patients completed the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and participated in measurements of grip strength and range of motion. Anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique radiographs of the operative wrist were examined for union, screw breakage and/or loosening, and lunate change. Results The mean QuickDASH score was 24.4 and the mean PRWE score was 26.5. Mean grip strength was 29.2 kg or 84% of the nonoperative hand. Mean flexion, extension, radial deviation, and ulnar deviation were : 37.2, 28.9, 14.1, and 17.4 degrees, respectively. Eighty-seven percent of wrists achieved union; 8% had nonunion; and5% had indeterminate union. There were seven cases of screw breakage and seven cases of screw loosening (as defined by lucency or bony resorption surrounding screws). Twenty-three percent of wrists required reoperation (four total wrist arthrodesis and five reoperations for other reasons). Conclusion 4CA with a locking PEEK plate has clinical and radiographic outcomes similar to other methods. We observed a high rate of hardware complications. It is unclear whether this implant offers a clear advantage over other methods of fixation used in 4CA. Type of Study/Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.

Four-Corner Arthrodesis versus Proximal Row Carpectomy: Risk Factors and Complications Associated with Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use

Introduction This article compares opioid use patterns following four-corner arthrodesis (FCA) and proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and identifies risk factors and complications associated with prolonged opioid consumption.Materials and Methods The PearlDiver Research Program was used to identify patients undergoing primary FCA (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] codes 25820, 25825) or PRC (CPT 25215) from 2007 to 2017. Patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative opioid use, and postoperative complications were assessed. Opioids were identified through generic drug codes while complications were defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions, Clinical Modification codes. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.Results A total of 888 patients underwent FCA and 835 underwent PRC. Three months postoperatively, more FCA patients (18.0%) continued to use opioids than PRC patients (14.7%) (p = 0.033). Preoperative opioid use was the strongest risk factor for prolonged opioid use for both FCA (odds ratio [OR]: 4.91; p < 0.001) and PRC (OR: 6.33; p < 0.001). Prolonged opioid use was associated with an increased risk of implant complications (OR: 4.96; p < 0.001) and conversion to total wrist arthrodesis (OR: 3.55; p < 0.001) following FCA.Conclusion Prolonged postoperative opioid use is more frequent in patients undergoing FCA than PRC. Understanding the prevalence, risk factors, and complications associated with prolonged postoperative opioid use after these procedures may help physicians counsel patients and implement opioid minimization strategies preoperatively.

Four-Corner Arthrodesis: Comparative Analysis of Open Technique Versus Percutaneous Technique with Arthroscopic Assistance.

Introduction Four-corner arthrodesis is a salvage technique for patients with carpal advanced osteoarthritis. Nowadays, percutaneous techniques with arthroscopic assistance have been described, achieving favorable results with minimally invasive techniques advantages over open surgery. Objective To compare functional and radiological results in patients with SLAC or SNAC wrists operated with open surgical technique versus percutaneous surgery with arthroscopic assistance. Materials and Methods Retrospective case-control study of clinical records and radiological images of patients with carpal advanced osteoarthritis operated with both surgical techniques. We studied demographic variables, pain with visual analog scale (VAS) score, function in ranges of mobility, time of consolidation, and correction of DISI deformity. Results A total of 22 male patients with an average age of 32.5 years were studied. Thirteen patients in the case group (percutaneous technique with arthroscopic assistance) and nine patients in the control group (open surgery). Pain score in VAS at discharge was 3 for cases and 5 in controls ( p = 0.008), and at 30 days postoperatively, it was 0 and 3 respectively ( p = 0.00). The extension and flexion ranges were 52.6°and 38.7° in the cases and 35.7° and 32.4° in the control group ( p = 0.119 and 0.0016, respectively). The capitolunate angle was 10°in the controls and 5°in the cases ( p = 0.0008). The time of consolidation was 8.8 weeks in cases and 12.5 weeks in controls ( p = 0.039). Conclusions The percutaneous technique with arthroscopic assistance for the 4-courner arthrodesis is a reproducible technique and is effective in achieving consolidation, pain reduction and preservation of wrist motion. In the present study, we demonstrate superiority of this technique over the open surgery. Level of Evidence This is a Level III, therapeutic study.

Opioid Prescribing for Proximal Row Carpectomy versus Four-Corner Arthrodesis.

Background Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and four-corner arthrodesis (4-CA) represent motion-sparing procedures for addressing degenerative wrist pathologies. While both procedures demonstrate comparable functional outcomes, postoperative pain presents a surgical challenge that often necessitates the use of opioids. Objectives The aim of this study was to (1) compare opioid prescribing patterns surrounding PRC and 4-CA, (2) identify risk factors predisposing patients to increased perioperative and prolonged postoperative opioids, and (3) examine the association between opioids and perioperative health care utilization. Patients and Methods PearlDiver Patients Records Database was used to retrospectively identify patients undergoing primary PRC and 4-CA between 2010 and 2018. Patient demographics, comorbidities, prescription drug usage, and perioperative health care utilization were evaluated. Perioperative opioid prescriptions and post-operative opioid prescriptions were recorded. Logistic regression analysis evaluated the association of patient risk factors. Results There was no significant difference in perioperative (PRC [odds ratio {OR}: 0.84, p = 0.788]; 4-CA [OR: 0.75, p = 0.658]) or prolonged postoperative opioid prescriptions (PRC [OR: 0.95, p = 0.927]; 4-CA [OR: 0.99, p = 0.990]) between PRC and 4-CA. Chronic back pain and use of benzodiazepines or anticonvulsants were associated with increased risks of prolonged postoperative opioids. Prolonged postoperative opioids presented increased risks of emergency department visits (OR: 2.09, p = 0.019) and hospital readmissions (OR: 10.2, p = 0.003). Conclusion No significant differences exist in the prescription of opioids for PRC versus 4-CA. Both procedures have high amounts of prolonged postoperative opioid use, which is associated with increased risks of emergency department visits and hospital readmissions. Level of Evidence This is a level III, retrospective comparative study.

Five Wrist Operations That Give the Best Results.

After reading this article and viewing the videos, the participant should be able to: 1. Recognize the following five wrist operations as consistent options for different wrist injuries: carpal tunnel release, medial femoral condyle bone flap for scaphoid nonunion associated with carpal collapse and avascular necrosis, scaphocapitate arthrodesis for Kienböck disease, percutaneous screw fixation of nondisplaced scaphoid fracture, and four-corner arthrodesis. 2. Know the state-of-the-art of these five procedures. 3. State the indications of each operation. 4. List the surgical steps of these five procedures. The wrist is a complex joint that concentrates different types of tissues (e.g., bone, cartilage, ligaments, nerves, vessels) and a broad different spectrum of diseases. Treatment of wrist injuries has improved during recent years, mainly because of improvement in strategy, techniques, microsurgical equipment, understanding anatomy and improvements in technology. In this article, we present the five operations (i.e., carpal tunnel release, medial femoral condyle bone flap for scaphoid nonunion associated with carpal collapse and avascular necrosis, scaphocapitate arthrodesis for Kienböck disease, percutaneous screw fixation of nondisplaced scaphoid fracture, and four-corner arthrodesis) that have consistently given good outcomes in patients suffering from different wrist injuries/maladies.

Mechanical performance comparison of two surgical constructs for wrist four-corner arthrodesis via dorsal and radial approaches

BackgroundFour-corner arthrodesis, which involves fusing four carpal bones while removing the scaphoid bone, is a standard surgery for the treatment of advanced stages of wrist arthritis. Nowadays, it can be performed using a dorsal approach by fixing a plate to the bones and a new radial approach is in development. To date, there is no consensus on the biomechanically optimal and most reliable surgical construct for four-corner arthrodesis. MethodsTo evaluate them biomechanically and thus assist the surgeon in choosing the best implant orientation, radial or dorsal, the two different four-corner arthrodesis surgical constructs were virtually simulated on a 3D finite element model representing all major structures of the wrist. Two different realistic load sets were applied to the model, representing common tasks for the elderly. FindingsResults consistency was assessed by comparing with the literature the force magnitude computed on the carpal bones. The Von Mises stress distribution in the radial and dorsal plates were calculated. Stress concentration was located at the plate-screw interface for both surgical constructs, with a maximum stress value of 413 MPa for the dorsal plate compared to 326 MPa for the radial plate, meaning that the stress levels are more unfavourable in the dorsal approach. InterpretationAlthough some bending stress was found in one load case, the radial plate was mechanically more robust in the other load case. Despite some limitations, this study provides, for the first time, quantified evidence that the newly developed radial surgical construct is mechanically as efficient as the dorsal surgical construct.

Acute four-corner arthrodesis for the treatment of 2 cases of trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocation

Acute four-corner arthrodesis for the treatment of 2 cases of trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocation

Four-corner fusion method using a bioabsorbable plate for scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrists: a case series study

BackgroundScaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis is an acceptable salvage procedure for the treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrists, since first popularized in the 1980s. We investigated the potential application of novel bioabsorbable plates and screws made of un-sintered hydroxyapatite/poly-L-lactide composite for the treatment of metacarpal fractures. We used this material for the fixation of four-corner fusions for SLAC or SNAC wrists commencing from April 2009. The purpose of this study was to clarify the controversy in the literature regarding the use of these plates.MethodsThe surgical procedures and clinical outcomes of four-corner fusions using a bioabsorbable (poly-L-lactic acid and hydroxyapatite) plate were reported. Ten patients (mean age, 59.2 years) with SLAC or SNAC wrists underwent fusions between April 2009 and June 2016. The primary diseases were scapholunate ligament injury, Preiser disease, and scaphoid pseudarthrosis. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 45.9 months (range, 12–86).ResultsIn all patients, bone union was achieved without dislocation or pain. The mean wrist flexion and extension arc improved from 78.5 degrees before surgery to 90.5 degrees after surgery. Mean grip strength improved from 51 to 69% after surgery, and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score improved from 53.5 to 14.3. No complications such as infection, avascular swelling, or tendon adhesion were observed. This implant requires no removal of internal fixation devices, produces stable outcomes, and is an effective fusion technique.ConclusionsWe summarized the outcomes of four-corner arthrodesis using bioabsorbable plates. Satisfactory clinical results were shown, with no obvious complications. This novel plate also serves as a good alternative for patients who are allergic to metals. Furthermore, bioabsorbable plates are advantageous as they do not require removal.

Four-Corner Arthrodesis Using a Dedicated Dorsal Circular Plate.

Scaphoid excision and 4-corner fusion is a standard procedure for advanced carpal collapse. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its effectiveness using a specific designed locking plate of the latest generation. Between October 2012 and December 2015, 12 patients underwent this procedure using the Flower (KLS Martin Group, Tuttlingen, Germany) circular locking plate. The surgical technique is standardized. Three patients were affected by a scapholunate advanced collapse and 9 patients by a scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse. All patients underwent a computed tomographic scan to study the real achievement of the fusion. Only 2 patients did not show complete fusion. All the patients with successful fusion returned to previous work and manual activities. Four-corner arthrodesis with circular locking plate is an alternative surgical treatment for carpal arthritic collapse.

Salvage of advanced carpal collapse: proximal row carpectomy with pyrocarbon resurfacing of the capitate versus four-corner arthrodesis.

In this retrospective study we report on two comparable groups of patients with advanced carpal arthritis treated with either proximal row carpectomy combined with a pyrocarbon resurfacing of the capitate (31 patients) or a four-corner arthrodesis and dorsal plating (26 patients). Follow-up time was 46 months (24-118). Except for a modestly higher radial wrist deviation in the patients treated with four-corner arthrodesis, there were no significant differences in outcomes between the groups. Asymptomatic progression of osteoarthritis in the lunate fossa was observed in four cases in both groups. Two cases were converted to a total wrist arthrodesis in the pyrocarbon group compared with one case in the four-corner arthrodesis group. Although four-corner arthrodesis remains the reference standard in the treatment of wrist osteoarthritis with involvement of the midcarpal joint, proximal row carpectomy combined with pyrocarbon resurfacing of the capitate is an alternative option. It can even be used in selected cases with erosion of the lunate fossa.Level of evidence: III.