Formulation Of Dynamics In Terms Research Articles

Hasegawa–Wakatani and Modified Hasegawa–Wakatani Turbulence Induced by Ion-Temperature-Gradient Instabilities

We review some recent results that have been obtained in the investigation of zonal flow emergence, by means of a gyrokinetic trapped ion model, in the regime of ion temperature gradient instabilities for tokamak plasmas. We show that an analogous formulation of the zonal flow dynamics in terms of the Reynolds tensor applies in the fluid and kinetic regimes, where polarization effects play a major role. The kinetic regime leads to the emergence of a resonant mode at a frequency close to the drift frequency. With the objective of modeling both separate fluid and kinetic regimes of zonal flows, we used in this paper a methodology for deriving both Charney–Hasegawa–Mima (CHM) and Hasegawa–Wakatani models. This methodology is based on the trapped ion model and is analogous to the hierarchy leading from the Vlasov equation to the macroscopic fluid equations. The nature of zonal flows in the hierarchy of the Mima, Hasegawa and Wakatani models is investigated and discussed through comparisons with global kinetic simulations. Applications to the CHM equation are discussed, which applies to a broad variety of hydrodynamical systems, ranging from large-scale processes met in magnetically confined plasma to the so-called zonostrophy turbulence emerging in the case of small-scale forced, two-dimensional barotropic turbulence (Sukoriansky et al. Phys. Rev. Letters, 101, 178501, 2008).

Quantum mechanics of dissipative systems and noncanonical formalism

We present a noncanonical transformation theory of large dynamical systems that leads to a formulation of dynamics in terms of processes, in which the concepts of well‐defined “units” and “interactions” can be simultaneously accommodated. Copyright © 1974 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

WHY IRREVERSIBILITY? THE FORMULATION OF CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS FOR NONINTEGRABLE SYSTEMS

Nonintegrable Poincaré systems with continuous spectrum (so-called Large Poincaré Systems, LPS) lead to the appearance of diffusive terms in the framework of dynamics. These terms break time symmetry. They lead, therefore, to limitations to classical trajectory dynamics and of wave functions. These diffusive terms correspond to well-defined classes of dynamical processes (i.e., so-called “vacuum-vacuum” transitions). The diffusive effects are amplified in situations corresponding to persistent interactions. As a result, we have to include already in the fundamental dynamical description the two aspects, probability and irreversibility, which are so conspicuous on the macroscopic level. We have to formulate both classical and quantum mechanics on the Liouville level of probability distributions (or density matrices). For integrable systems, we recover the usual formulations of classical or quantum mechanics. Instead of being irreducible concepts, which cannot be further analyzed, trajectories and wave functions appear as special solutions of the Liouville-von Neumann equations. This extension of classical and quantum dynamics permits us to unify the two concepts of nature we inherited from the 19th century, based on the one hand on dynamical time-reversible laws and on the other on an evolutionary view associated to entropy. It leads also to a unified formulation of quantum theory avoiding the conventional dual structure based on Schrödinger’s equation on the one hand, and on the “collapse” of the wave function on the other. A dynamical interpretation is given to processes such as decoherence or approach to equilibrium without any appeal to extra dynamic considerations (such as the many-world theory, coarse graining or averaging over the environment). There is a striking parallelism between classical and quantum theory. For LPS we have, in general, both a “collapse” of trajectories and of wave functions for LPS. In both cases, we need a generalized formulation of dynamics in terms of probability distributions or density matrices. Since the beginning of this century, we know that classical mechanics had to be generalized to take into account the existence of universal constants. We now see that classical as well as quantum mechanics also have to be extended to include unstable dynamical systems such as LPS. As a result, we achieve a new formulation of "laws of physics" dealing no more with certitudes but with probabilities. The formulation is appropriate to describe an open, evolving universe.

Why irreversibility? The formulation of classical and quantum mechanics for nonintegrable systems

AbstractNonintegrable Poincaré systems with a continuous spectrum (so‐called large Poincaré systems, LPS) lead to the appearance of diffusive terms in the frame of classical or quantum dynamics. These terms break time symmetry. They lead, therefore, to limitations to classical trajectory theory and of wave‐function formalism (Schrödinger's equation). These diffusive terms correspond to well‐defined classes of dynamical processes (i.e., so‐called vacuum‐vacuum transitions). The diffusive effects are amplified in situations corresponding to persistent interactions. As a result, we have to include, already, in the fundamental dynamical description the two basic aspects, probability and irreversibility, which are so conspicuous on the macroscopic level. We have to formulate both classical and quantum mechanics on the Liouville level of probability distributions (or density matrices). For integrable systems, we recover the usual formulation of classical or quantum mechanics. Instead of being primitive concepts, which cannot be further analyzed, trajectories and wave functions appear as special solutions of the Liouville–von Neumann equations. This extension of classical and quantum dynamics permits us to unify the two concepts of nature that we inherited from the nineteenth century, based, on the one hand, on dynamical time‐reversible laws and, on the other, on an evolutionary view associated to entropy. It leads also to a unified formulation of quantum theory, avoiding the conventional dual structure based on Schrödinger's equation, on the one hand, and on the “collapse” of the wave function, on the other. A dynamical interpretation is given to processes such as decoherence or approach to equilibrium without any appeal to extra dynamic considerations (such as many‐world theory, coarse graining, or averaging over the environment). There is a striking parallelism between classical and quantum theory. For large Poincaré systems (LPS), we have, in general, both a “collapse” of trajectories and of wave functions. In both cases, we need a generalized formulation of dynamics in terms of probability distributions or density matrices. Since the beginning of this century, we have known that classical mechanics had to be generalized to take into account the existence of universal constants. We now see that classical as well as quantum mechanics also have to be extended to include unstable dynamical systems such as LPS. As a result, we achieve a new formulation of “laws of physics” dealing no more with certitudes but with probabilities. This formulation is appropriate to describe an open, evolving universe. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Relation between Lagrangian and Eulerian spectra based upon a canonical statistical theory of geophysical fluid waves.

A formulation of fluid dynamics in terms of Lagrangian variables allows one to make direct use of the standard methods of statistical mechanics. However, most observations and empirical studies of large geophysical fluid systems are in terms of Eulerian variables, and this raises the issue of how to relate quantities given in terms of one set of variables to the corresponding quantities given in terms of the other set. In a completely general treatment of fluids, one must consider both oscillatory and translational modes of motion. The oscillatory modes are wavelike and lead to correlations which are analogous to those for phonons in the solid. The translational modes are particlelike and lead to correlations which correspond to diffusion in a weakly interacting gas. In this paper we consider the class of fluids for which the translational modes can be neglected. Based upon the assumption that the statistical distribution of the canonically conjugate Lagrangian variables is of a Gaussian form, we obtain a tractable expression for the Eulerian spectra in terms of the Lagrangian spectra and show that, in general, the two types of spectra are significantly different. In particular, it is shown that the Eulerian wave-number spectrum exhibits a large wave-number power-law decay which is similar to that often observed in geophysical systems and further is independent of the detailed nature of the Lagrangian wave-number spectrum. The large wave-number decay of the Eulerian spectrum is due to advection and is strictly a kinematic effect. This also implies that experiments which focus on the large wave-number advective tail cannot yield information about the true dynamics of the system. The application of this result to the problem of explaining the observed distribution of oceanic internal waves is discussed.