Purpose: A 50 year Caucasian female was referred to our gastroenterology clinic for evaluation of a rectal fistula. Her past medical history is significant for a diagnosis of cervical cancer 18 years ago for which she was treated with pelvic radiation. One year later she was subsequently found to have vaginal cancer; underwent pelvic exoneration which included TAH-BSO, removal of bladder and partial colectomy (amount), which resulted in a urostomy and colostomy. Seventeen years post surgery, patient has complaints of passing urine through rectum for 4 month and noticed the passage of mucus through her colostomy, however did not notice increased colostomy output. She denied abdominal pain, rectal bleeding, fever or chills. Laboratory data showed hemoglobin of 11.9, MCV 92, normal chemistries and liver function tests, including normal albumin. PET scan showed no metastasis or residual cancer. CT abdomen and pelvis showed a fistulous connection between her left ureter and recto-sigmoid area of her colon. A colonoscopy was performed through rectal stump and ostomy. A small opening was seen in rectum suspicious for a fistula. Rectal mucosa showed mild erythema and friability. Only 30cm of colon was encountered with erythema and friability in the cecum and the remaining colon appearing endoscopically normal. Colonic biopsies revealed chronic active colitis, crypt distortion and focal acute cryptitis. The terminal ileum appeared normal, however biopsy showed mild ileitis. IBD serology revealed a pattern consistent with IBD, specifically Crohn's disease. Given patient's history; radiation induced colitis with fistulization is the most likely diagnosis, however this case illustrates her endoscopic, pathologic and serologic findings are not specific to radiation colitis. A review of the literature was done to see if other than this patient's history if there are any distinguishing features to make a diagnosis of radiation colitis versus inflammatory bowel disease, and if this delineation between the two causes of intestinal inflammation would alter the patient's management. Currently no gold standard test exists for the diagnosis of IBD. For this reason, diagnosing IBD continues to be at times a diagnostic challenge for the gastroenterologist. Distinguishing among various forms of intestinal inflammation will remain a trial of clinical judgment; using relevant history, physical examination, laboratory testing, and detailed review of radiographic, endoscopic, and pathologic data.