Formation Of DNA Methylation Patterns Research Articles

Non-coding RNA directed DNA demethylation of Sphk1 CpG island

The formation of DNA methylation patterns is one of the epigenetic events that underlie mammalian development. The Sphk1 CpG island is a target for tissue-dependent DNA methylation as well as a template for generating multiple subtypes. The number of mammalian non-coding RNA genes is rapidly expanding. In this study, we found endogenous antisense transcripts, Khps1 subtypes with different sizes (600–20,000nt). A subtype, Khps1a, was a 1290-bp, non-coding, 5′-capped and 3′-polyadenylated RNA that originated from the CpG island and overlapped with a tissue-dependent differentially methylated region (T-DMR) of Sphk1. Intriguingly, overexpression of two fragments of Khps1 caused demethylation of CG sites in the T-DMR. Furthermore, this RNA-directed demethylation was associated with DNA methylation at three CC(A/T)GG sites in the T-DMR. The link between the RNA-directed CG demethylation and non-CG methylation provides a novel mechanism of epigenetic regulation and potential tool for epigenetic manipulation of mammalian cells.

Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation status of CpG islands in embryoid bodies, teratomas, and fetuses

Differentiation of embryonic stem (ES) cells into embryoid bodies (EBs) provides an in vitro system for the study of early lineage determination during mammalian development. We have previously reported that there are 247 CpG islands that potentially have tissue-dependent and differentially methylated regions (T-DMRs). This provided evidence that the formation of DNA methylation patterns at CpG islands is a crucial epigenetic event underlying mammalian development. Here we present an analysis by the restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) using NotI as a landmark enzyme of the genome-wide methylation status of CpG islands of ES cells and EBs and of teratomas produced from ES cells. These results are considered in relation to the methylation status of CpG islands of genomic DNA from normal fetus (10.5 dpc) and adult tissues. We have prepared a DNA methylation panel that consists of 259 T-DMRs and includes novel T-DMRs that are distinctly methylated or unmethylated in the teratomas. The DNA methylation pattern was complex and differed for the ES cells, EBs, and teratomas, providing evidence that differentiation of cells involves both de novo DNA methylation as well as demethylation. Comparison of the numbers of T-DMRs, that were differentially methylated or unmethylated among the cells and tissue types studied, revealed that the teratomas were the most epigenetically different from ES cells. Thus, analysis of the DNA methylation profiles prepared in this study provides new insights into the differentiation of ES cells and development of fetus, EB, teratoma, and somatic tissues.

Epigenetic marks by DNA methylation specific to stem, germ and somatic cells in mice.

DNA methylation is involved in many gene functions such as gene-silencing, X-inactivation, imprinting and stability of the gene. We recently found that some CpG islands had a tissue-dependent and differentially methylated region (T-DMR) in normal tissues, raising the possibility that there may be more CpG islands capable of differential methylation. We investigated the genome-wide DNA methylation pattern of CpG islands by restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) in mouse stem cells (ES, EG and trophoblast stem) before and after differentiation, and sperm as well as somatic tissues. A total of 247 spots out of 1500 (16%) showed differences in the appearance of their RLGS profiles, indicating that CpG islands having T-DMR were numerous and widespread. The methylation pattern was specific, and varied in a precise manner according to cell lineage, tissue type and during cell differentiation. Genomic loci with altered methylation status seem to be more common than has hitherto been realized. The formation of DNA methylation patterns at CpG islands is one of the epigenetic events which underlies the production of various cell types in the body. These findings should have implications for the use of embryonic stem cells and cells derived from them therapeutically, and also for the cloning of animals by the transfer of somatic cell nuclei.

Formation of DNA methylation patterns: nonmethylated GATC sequences in gut and pap operons.

Most of the adenine residues in GATC sequences in the Escherichia coli chromosome are methylated by the enzyme deoxyadenosine methyltransferase (Dam). However, at least 20 GATC sequences remain nonmethylated throughout the cell cycle. Here we examined how the DNA methylation patterns of GATC sequences within the regulatory regions of the pyelonephritis-associated pilus (pap) operon and the glucitol utilization (gut) operon were formed. The results obtained with an in vitro methylation protection assay showed that the addition of the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) to pap DNA was sufficient to protect the two GATC sequences in the pap regulatory region, GATC-I and GATC-II, from methylation by Dam. This finding was consistent with previously published data showing that Lrp was essential for methylation protection of these DNA sites in vivo. Methylation protection also occurred at a GATC site (GATC-44. 5) centered 44.5 bp upstream of the transcription start site of the gutABD operon. Two proteins, GutR and the catabolite gene activator protein (CAP), bound to DNA sites overlapping the GATC-44. 5-containing region of the gutABD operon. GutR, an operon-specific repressor, was essential for methylation protection in vivo, and binding of GutR protected GATC-44.5 from methylation in vitro. In contrast, binding of CAP at a site overlapping GATC-44.5 did not protect this site from methylation. Mutational analyses indicated that gutABD gene regulation was not controlled by methylation of GATC-44.5, in contrast to regulation of Pap pilus expression, which is directly controlled by methylation of the pap GATC-I and GATC-II sites.

Regulation of UropathogenicEscherichia coliAdhesin Expression by DNA Methylation

Pap pili play an important role in the pathogenesis of upper urinary tract infections by enabling uropathogenicEscherichia colito adhere to host epithelial cells. Pap pili are coded for by the pyelonephritis-associated pili (pap) operon, which consists of 11 genes required for the expression and assembly of Pap pili. Expression of Pap pili is regulated by a phase variation mechanism in which the pili expression state of the bacterial population is skewed between phase-on (expression positive) and phase-off (expression negative) states. Pap phase variation is controlled by the cooperative binding of leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) to two sets of Lrp binding sites in the upstream regulatory region of thepapoperon. A single GATC sequence, which is the target site for deoxyadenosine methylase (Dam), is centrally located within each Lrp binding region. Dam plays a critical role in the expression of Pap pili via the formation of DNA methylation patterns. Methylation of GATC-I reduced the affinity of Lrp forpapDNA by about twofold. Conversely, Lrp specifically blocked methylation ofpapGATC-Iin vitro.These data support the hypothesis that Lrp and Dam compete for binding to GATC-I, and are consistent with previous results indicating that methylation of GATC-I is important for stability of the phase-off state.

The Formation of DNA Methylation Patterns and the Silencing of Genes

The Formation of DNA Methylation Patterns and the Silencing of Genes

De novo methylation of transfected CAT gene plasmid constructs in F9 mouse embryonal carcinoma cells

To study the formation of DNA methylation patterns, plasmids containing promoters of different strengths in front of the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene were transfected into F9 mouse embryonal carcinoma cells. Methylation of the integrated plasmids as well as copy numbers and activities of the reporter gene were determined for individual cell clones. The methylation pattern of the integrated plasmids was found to be determined by properties of the DNA sequence itself. In contrast, the specific methylation patterns were invariant with respect to integration site, copy number and arrangement of the integrates; methylation did also not correlate with transcriptional activity of the different promoters. Certain promoter regions may therefore contain signals recognized by the de novo methylation activity in embryonal carcinoma cells.