Fork Rescue Research Articles

Transcription as source of genetic heterogeneity in budding yeast.

Transcription presents challenges to genome stability both directly, by altering genome topology and exposing single-stranded DNA to chemical insults and nucleases, and indirectly by introducing obstacles to the DNA replication machinery. Such obstacles include the RNA polymerase holoenzyme itself, DNA-bound regulatory factors, G-quadruplexes and RNA-DNA hybrid structures known as R-loops. Here, we review the detrimental impacts of transcription on genome stability in budding yeast, as well as the mitigating effects of transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair and of systems that maintain DNA replication fork processivity and integrity. Interactions between DNA replication and transcription have particular potential to induce mutation and structural variation, but we conclude that such interactions must have only minor effects on DNA replication by the replisome with little if any direct mutagenic outcome. However, transcription can significantly impair the fidelity of replication fork rescue mechanisms, particularly Break Induced Replication, which is used to restart collapsed replication forks when other means fail. This leads to de novo mutations, structural variation and extrachromosomal circular DNA formation that contribute to genetic heterogeneity, but only under particular conditions and in particular genetic contexts, ensuring that the bulk of the genome remains extremely stable despite the seemingly frequent interactions between transcription and DNA replication.

Cooperative interaction of CST and RECQ4 resolves G-quadruplexes and maintains telomere stability.

Human CST (CTC1-STN1-TEN1) is a ssDNA-binding complex that interacts with the replisome to aid in stalled fork rescue. We previously found that CST promotes telomere replication to maintain genomic integrity via G-quadruplex (G4) resolution. However, the detailed mechanism by which CST resolves G4s in vivo and whether additional factors are involved remains unclear. Here, we identify RECQ4 as a novel CST-interacting partner and show that RECQ4 can unwind G4 structures in vitro using a FRET assay. Moreover, G4s accumulate at the telomere after RECQ4 depletion, resulting in telomere dysfunction, including the formation of MTSs, SFEs, and TIFs, suggesting that RECQ4 is crucial for telomere integrity. Furthermore, CST is also required for RECQ4 telomere or chromatin localization in response to G4 stabilizers. RECQ4 is involved in preserving genomic stability by CST and RECQ4 disruption impairs restart of replication forks stalled by G4s. Overall, our findings highlight the essential roles of CST and RECQ4 in resolving G-rich regions, where they collaborate to resolve G4-induced replication deficiencies and maintain genomic homeostasis.

Bacillus subtilis RadA/Sms-Mediated Nascent Lagging-Strand Unwinding at Stalled or Reversed Forks Is a Two-Step Process: RadA/Sms Assists RecA Nucleation, and RecA Loads RadA/Sms

Replication fork rescue requires Bacillus subtilis RecA, its negative (SsbA) and positive (RecO) mediators, and fork-processing (RadA/Sms). To understand how they work to promote fork remodeling, reconstituted branched replication intermediates were used. We show that RadA/Sms (or its variant, RadA/Sms C13A) binds to the 5'-tail of a reversed fork with longer nascent lagging-strand and unwinds it in the 5'→3' direction, but RecA and its mediators limit unwinding. RadA/Sms cannot unwind a reversed fork with a longer nascent leading-strand, or a gapped stalled fork, but RecA interacts with and activates unwinding. Here, the molecular mechanism by which RadA/Sms, in concert with RecA, in a two-step reaction, unwinds the nascent lagging-strand of reversed or stalled forks is unveiled. First, RadA/Sms, as a mediator, contributes to SsbA displacement from the forks and nucleates RecA onto single-stranded DNA. Then, RecA, as a loader, interacts with and recruits RadA/Sms onto the nascent lagging strand of these DNA substrates to unwind them. Within this process, RecA limits RadA/Sms self-assembly to control fork processing, and RadA/Sms prevents RecA from provoking unnecessary recombination.

Detection of Homologous Recombination Intermediates via Proximity Ligation and Quantitative PCR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

DNA damage, including DNA double-stranded breaks and inter-strand cross-links, incurred during the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle can be repaired by homologous recombination (HR). In addition, HR represents an important mechanism of replication fork rescue following stalling or collapse. The regulation of the many reversible and irreversible steps of this complex pathway promotes its fidelity. The physical analysis of the recombination intermediates formed during HR enables the characterization of these controls by various nucleoprotein factors and their interactors. Though there are well-established methods to assay specific events and intermediates in the recombination pathway, the detection of D-loop formation and extension, two critical steps in this pathway, has proved challenging until recently. Here, efficient methods for detecting key events in the HR pathway, namely DNA double-stranded break formation, D-loop formation, D-loop extension, and the formation of products via break-induced replication (BIR) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are described. These assays detect their relevant recombination intermediates and products with high sensitivity and are independent of cellular viability. The detection of D-loops, D-loop extension, and the BIR product is based on proximity ligation. Together, these assays allow for the study of the kinetics of HR at the population level to finely address the functions of HR proteins and regulators at significant steps in the pathway.

The Finely Coordinated Action of SSB and NurA/HerA Complex Strictly Regulates the DNA End Resection Process in Saccharolobus solfataricus.

Generation of the 3′ overhang is a critical step during homologous recombination (HR) and replication fork rescue processes. This event is usually performed by a series of DNA nucleases and/or helicases. The nuclease NurA and the ATPase HerA, together with the highly conserved MRE11/RAD50 proteins, play an important role in generating 3′ single-stranded DNA during archaeal HR. Little is known, however, about HerA-NurA function and activation of this fundamental and complicated DNA repair process. Herein, we analyze the functional relationship among NurA, HerA and the single-strand binding protein SSB from Saccharolubus solfataricus. We demonstrate that SSB clearly inhibits NurA endonuclease activity and its exonuclease activities also when in combination with HerA. Moreover, we show that SSB binding to DNA is greatly stimulated by the presence of either NurA or NurA/HerA. In addition, if on the one hand NurA binding is not influenced, on the other hand, HerA binding is reduced when SSB is present in the reaction. In accordance with what has been observed, we have shown that HerA helicase activity is not stimulated by SSB. These data suggest that, in archaea, the DNA end resection process is governed by the strictly combined action of NurA, HerA and SSB.

Restriction of RecG translocation by DNA mispairing

BackgroundThe RecG DNA helicase plays a crucial role in stalled replication fork rescue. We have recently discovered that interaction of RecG with single-strand DNA binding protein (SSB) remodels RecG, allowing it to spontaneously translocate upstream of the fork. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that mispairing of DNA could limit such translocation of RecG. MethodsHere, we used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to directly test this hypothesis and investigate how sensitive RecG translocation is to different types of mispairing. ResultsWe found that a CC mispairing, at a distance of 30 bp from the fork position, prevents translocation of RecG over this mispairing. A G-bulge, placed at the same distance, also has a similar blocking efficiency. However, a CC mispairing, 10 bp away from the fork, does not prevent RecG translocation beyond 10 bp distance, but decreases complex yield. Modeling of RecG-DNA complexes show that 10 bp distance from the fork is within the binding footprint of RecG on DNA. ConclusionsOur results suggest that the RecG translocation upstream of the replication fork is limited by mispairings in the parental arm of the replication fork.General significanceThese findings led us to propose dual functions for RecG, in which the thermally driven translocation of RecG can be a mechanism for the additional control of the DNA paring in which RecG can detect the lesions in front of the replication fork, adding to the fidelity of the DNA replication machinery.

Coordinated Cut and Bypass: Replication of Interstrand Crosslink-Containing DNA.

DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) are covalently bound DNA lesions, which are commonly induced by chemotherapeutic drugs, such as cisplatin and mitomycin C or endogenous byproducts of metabolic processes. This type of DNA lesion can block ongoing RNA transcription and DNA replication and thus cause genome instability and cancer. Several cellular defense mechanism, such as the Fanconi anemia pathway have developed to ensure accurate repair and DNA replication when ICLs are present. Various structure-specific nucleases and translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases have come into focus in relation to ICL bypass. Current models propose that a structure-specific nuclease incision is needed to unhook the ICL from the replication fork, followed by the activity of a low-fidelity TLS polymerase enabling replication through the unhooked ICL adduct. This review focuses on how, in parallel with the Fanconi anemia pathway, PCNA interactions and ICL-induced PCNA ubiquitylation regulate the recruitment, substrate specificity, activity, and coordinated action of certain nucleases and TLS polymerases in the execution of stalled replication fork rescue via ICL bypass.

Single-molecule insight into stalled replication fork rescue in Escherichia coli.

DNA replication forks stall at least once per cell cycle in Escherichia coli. DNA replication must be restarted if the cell is to survive. Restart is a multi-step process requiring the sequential action of several proteins whose actions are dictated by the nature of the impediment to fork progression. When fork progress is impeded, the sequential actions of SSB, RecG and the RuvABC complex are required for rescue. In contrast, when a template discontinuity results in the forked DNA breaking apart, the actions of the RecBCD pathway enzymes are required to resurrect the fork so that replication can resume. In this review, we focus primarily on the significant insight gained from single-molecule studies of individual proteins, protein complexes, and also, partially reconstituted regression and RecBCD pathways. This insight is related to the bulk-phase biochemical data to provide a comprehensive review of each protein or protein complex as it relates to stalled DNA replication fork rescue.

Nanoscale interaction of RecG with mobile fork DNA.

RecG DNA helicase is a guardian of the bacterial genome where it dominates stalled DNA replication fork rescue. The single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) is involved in this process and promotes the binding of RecG to stalled replication forks. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to investigate the interaction of RecG and SSB on a mobile fork substrate capable of being regressed. In the absence of proteins, the fork undergoes spontaneous dynamics between two states, defined by the length of the DNA complementarity at the fork. The binding of SSB does not affect these dynamics as it binds to single-stranded regions as expected. In contrast, RecG interacts with the two states quite differently. We demonstrate that RecG has two modes of interaction with fork DNA in the presence of SSB and ATP. In the first mode, RecG translocates over the duplex region and this activity is defined by SSB-mediated remodeling of helicase. In the second mode, RecG utilizes its helicase activity to regress the fork, in an ATP-dependent manner, displacing SSB on the ssDNA. Overall, our results highlight two functions of RecG that can be employed in the regulation of stalled DNA replication fork rescue.

Replication fork rescue in mammalian mitochondria

Replication stalling has been associated with the formation of pathological mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) rearrangements. Yet, almost nothing is known about the fate of stalled replication intermediates in mitochondria. We show here that replication stalling in mitochondria leads to replication fork regression and mtDNA double-strand breaks. The resulting mtDNA fragments are normally degraded by a mechanism involving the mitochondrial exonuclease MGME1, and the loss of this enzyme results in accumulation of linear and recombining mtDNA species. Additionally, replication stress promotes the initiation of alternative replication origins as an apparent means of rescue by fork convergence. Besides demonstrating an interplay between two major mechanisms rescuing stalled replication forks – mtDNA degradation and homology-dependent repair – our data provide evidence that mitochondria employ similar mechanisms to cope with replication stress as known from other genetic systems.

Rep and UvrD Antagonize One Another at Stalled Replication Forks and This Is Exacerbated by SSB

The Rep and UvrD DNA helicases are proposed to act at stalled DNA replication forks to facilitate replication restart when RNA polymerase stalls forks. To clarify the role of these DNA helicases in fork rescue, we used a coupled spectrophotometric ATPase assay to determine how they act on model fork substrates. For both enzymes, activity is low on regressed fork structures, suggesting that they act prior to the regression step that generates a Holliday junction. In fact, the preferred cofactors for both enzymes are forks with a gap in the nascent leading strand, consistent with the 3′–5′ direction of translocation. Surprisingly, for Rep, this specificity is altered in the presence of stoichiometric amounts of a single-strand DNA-binding protein (SSB) relative to a fork with a gap in the nascent lagging strand. Even though Rep and UvrD are similar in structure, elevated concentrations of SSB inhibit Rep, but they have little to no effect on UvrD. Furthermore, Rep and UvrD antagonize one another at a fork. This is surprising given that these helicases have been shown to form a heterodimer and are proposed to act together to rescue an RNA polymerase-stalled fork. Consequently, the results herein indicate that although Rep and UvrD can act on similar fork substrates, they cannot function on the same fork simultaneously.

Abstract 1356: NSMCE2 enables rescue of collapsed replication forks to prevent mitotic DNA damage

Abstract Background: Replication forks that are persistently blocked cannot restart, even after DNA damage is repaired. These forks are termed collapsed forks. In order to fully duplicate the genome, collapsed forks must be rescued by activation of nearby dormant origins of replication. Homologous recombination (HR) is essential in collapsed-fork rescue. Cells deficient in the SUMO E3 ligase NSMCE2 exhibit mitotic defects, are sensitive to DNA damaging agents, and have defects in HR. Thus, NSMCE2 regulates HR during replication stress, but the molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. In yeasts, hypomorphic NSMCE2 (MMS21) alleles accumulate HR intermediates during replication stress. We therefore hypothesized that NSMCE2 regulates RAD51 function during collapsed fork rescue. Results: It was previously shown that sumoylation of the BLM helicase results in recruitment of RAD51 to stalled forks. Consistent with data in yeast, we found that BLM sumolyation is dependent on NSMCE2. However, contrary to our expectation, we found that the amount of RAD51 protein that accumulated at collapsed forks was over two times greater in NSMCE2-deficient cells than in normal cells. In contrast, the levels of BLM, RPA, single-stranded DNA, and γH2AX at stalled forks is reduced by half. Consistent with the low levels of γH2AX, the double-strand breaks and sister chromatid exchanges that accumulate during collapsed fork rescue were also greatly diminished in NSMCE2-deficient cells. Thus, despite the over-accumulation of RAD51 to sites of collapsed replication forks, cells are unable to perform HR efficiently, indicating that RAD51 is unable to complete its function there. In NSMCE2-deficient cells, the hyper-accumulated RAD51 at collapsed forks persists into mitosis where excess under-replicated DNA causes mitotic DNA damage. Conclusions: The hyper-accumulation of RAD51 at stalled forks we observed in NSMCE2-deficient cells suggests that NSMCE2 is required for the remodeling of collapsed forks that normally leads to the rescue of collapsed forks, namely, the unloading of RAD51, DNA breakage, repair by HR, and completion of DNA synthesis. We suggest that the excess accumulation of RAD51 that is observed in a substantial number of cancers is not sufficient to demonstrate that the cells are HR proficient. The identification of NSMCE2 as a controller of HR-mediated fork rescue also highlights NSMCE2's potential as a new therapeutic target for combinatorial therapy of HR-dependent cancers. Citation Format: Kelvin W. Pond, Christelle DeRenty, Mary K. Yagle, Nathan Ellis. NSMCE2 enables rescue of collapsed replication forks to prevent mitotic DNA damage [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1356.

MRE11 and EXO1 nucleases degrade reversed forks and elicit MUS81-dependent fork rescue in BRCA2-deficient cells

The breast cancer susceptibility proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2 have emerged as key stabilizing factors for the maintenance of replication fork integrity following replication stress. In their absence, stalled replication forks are extensively degraded by the MRE11 nuclease, leading to chemotherapeutic sensitivity. Here we report that BRCA proteins prevent nucleolytic degradation by protecting replication forks that have undergone fork reversal upon drug treatment. The unprotected regressed arms of reversed forks are the entry point for MRE11 in BRCA-deficient cells. The CtIP protein initiates MRE11-dependent degradation, which is extended by the EXO1 nuclease. Next, we show that the initial limited resection of the regressed arms establishes the substrate for MUS81 in BRCA2-deficient cells. In turn, MUS81 cleavage of regressed forks with a ssDNA tail promotes POLD3-dependent fork rescue. We propose that targeting this pathway may represent a new strategy to modulate BRCA2-deficient cancer cell response to chemotherapeutics that cause fork degradation.

A mechanistic study of helicases with magnetic traps.

Helicases are a broad family of enzymes that separate nucleic acid double strand structures (DNA/DNA, DNA/RNA, or RNA/RNA) and thus are essential to DNA replication and the maintenance of nucleic acid integrity. We review the picture that has emerged from single molecule studies of the mechanisms of DNA and RNA helicases and their interactions with other proteins. Many features have been uncovered by these studies that were obscured by bulk studies, such as DNA strands switching, mechanical (rather than biochemical) coupling between helicases and polymerases, helicase-induced re-hybridization and stalled fork rescue.

A Novel C-Terminal Domain of RecJ is Critical for Interaction with HerA in Deinococcus radiodurans.

Homologous recombination (HR) generates error-free repair products, which plays an important role in double strand break repair and replication fork rescue processes. DNA end resection, the critical step in HR, is usually performed by a series of nuclease/helicase. RecJ was identified as a 5′-3′ exonuclease involved in bacterial DNA end resection. Typical RecJ possesses a conserved DHH domain, a DHHA1 domain, and an oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB) fold. However, RecJs from Deinococcus-Thermus phylum, such as Deinococcus radiodurans RecJ (DrRecJ), possess an extra C-terminal domain (CTD), of which the function has not been characterized. Here, we showed that a CTD-deletion of DrRecJ (DrRecJΔC) could not restore drrecJ mutant growth and mitomycin C (MMC)-sensitive phenotypes, indicating that this domain is essential for DrRecJ in vivo. DrRecJΔC displayed reduced DNA nuclease activity and DNA binding ability. Direct interaction was identified between DrRecJ-CTD and DrHerA, which stimulates DrRecJ nuclease activity by enhancing its DNA binding affinity. Moreover, DrNurA nuclease, another partner of DrHerA, inhibited the stimulation of DrHerA on DrRecJ nuclease activity by interaction with DrHerA. Opposing growth and MMC-resistance phenotypes between the recJ and nurA mutants were observed. A novel modulation mechanism among DrRecJ, DrHerA, and DrNurA was also suggested.

Remodeling of RecG Helicase at the DNA Replication Fork by SSB Protein.

The RecG DNA helicase a key player in stalled replication fork rescue. The single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) participates in this process, but its role in the interaction of RecG with the fork remains unclear. We used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to visualize the interaction of RecG with a fork DNA in the presence of SSB. We discovered that SSB enhances RecG loading efficiency onto the DNA fork by threefold. Additionally, SSB interacts with RecG leading to the RecG remodeling. As a result, RecG separates from the fork, but remains bound to the DNA duplex. Moreover, in this new binding mode RecG is capable of translocation along the parental duplex DNA. We propose a model of RecG interaction with the replication fork involving two RecG binding modes. SSB plays the role of a remodeling factor defining the mode of RecG binding to the fork mediated by the SSB C-terminus. In the translocating mode, RecG remains in the vicinity of the fork and is capable of initiating the fork regression. Our results afford novel mechanistic insights into RecG interaction with the replication fork and provide the basis for further structural studies.

RecG Interaction with the DNA Replication Fork. The Role of E. coli SSB Protein

The RecG DNA helicase is a guardian of the bacterial genome. It binds to a variety of forked DNA structures thereby minimizing pathological DNA replication and facilitating stalled replication fork rescue. It is becomingly increasingly clear that SSB plays a critical role in the function of RecG, but the mechanisms of its interaction with SSB remain unclear. Here we use the atomic force microscope (AFM) to image the structure of RecG with a model fork substrate in the presence or absence of the single strand DNA binding protein (SSB). The DNA substrate has a 3′-end 69nt single stranded DNA (ssDNA) segment inserted between the two DNA duplexes. This design mimics a stalled fork with an ssDNA gap in the leading strand. The SSB proteins bind very specifically to the ssDNA segment with a yield of ∼90%. RecG protein also binds to the fork but the yield was ∼10%. However, the RecG loading on the same substrate increases three-fold in the presence of SSB suggesting that SSB facilitates RecG loading onto the fork. Moreover, in the presence of SSB, RecG becomes capable of translocating along the DNA duplex in an ATP hydrolysis-independent manner. No such mobility of RecG was observed in the absence of SSB. The preferable translocation direction is moving of RecG along parental arm which implies RecG could clear obstacles bound ahead of the fork. This novel activity of SSB requires the SSB C-terminus as a truncated SSB mutant does not substitute for wild type. SSB loading of RecG and subsequent translocation are unaffected by ATP, ADP or the non-hydrolyzable analog ATP-γ-S. Overall the results obtained reveal novel properties of RecG and highlight a new chaperone-type role of SSB in the DNA repair process.

Correction: Corrigendum: RecG and UvsW catalyse robust DNA rewinding critical for stalled DNA replication fork rescue

Corrigendum: RecG and UvsW catalyse robust DNA rewinding critical for stalled DNA replication fork rescue

Strand invasion by HLTF as a mechanism for template switch in fork rescue

Stalling of replication forks at unrepaired DNA lesions can result in discontinuities opposite the damage in the newly synthesized DNA strand. Translesion synthesis or facilitating the copy from the newly synthesized strand of the sister duplex by template switching can overcome such discontinuities. During template switch, a new primer–template junction has to be formed and two mechanisms, including replication fork reversal and D-loop formation have been suggested. Genetic evidence indicates a major role for yeast Rad5 in template switch and that both Rad5 and its human orthologue, Helicase-like transcription factor (HLTF), a potential tumour suppressor can facilitate replication fork reversal. This study demonstrates the ability of HLTF and Rad5 to form a D-loop without requiring ATP binding and/or hydrolysis. We also show that this strand-pairing activity is independent of RAD51 in vitro and is not mechanistically related to that of another member of the SWI/SNF family, RAD54. In addition, the 3′-end of the invading strand in the D-loop can serve as a primer and is extended by DNA polymerase. Our data indicate that HLTF is involved in a RAD51-independent D-loop branch of template switch pathway that can promote repair of gaps formed during replication of damaged DNA.

RecG and UvsW catalyse robust DNA rewinding critical for stalled DNA replication fork rescue

Helicases that both unwind and rewind DNA have central roles in DNA repair and genetic recombination. In contrast to unwinding, DNA rewinding by helicases has proved difficult to characterize biochemically because of its thermodynamically downhill nature. Here we use single-molecule assays to mechanically destabilize a DNA molecule and follow, in real time, unwinding and rewinding by two DNA repair helicases, bacteriophage T4 UvsW and Escherichia coli RecG. We find that both enzymes are robust rewinding enzymes, which can work against opposing forces as large as 35 pN, revealing their active character. The generation of work during the rewinding reaction allows them to couple rewinding to DNA unwinding and/or protein displacement reactions central to the rescue of stalled DNA replication forks. The overall results support a general mechanism for monomeric rewinding enzymes.