Identification expertise is one of the most complex types of expertise and, according to global standards such as DVI-Interpol, involves several parallel types of investigation aimed at confirming the result. Forensic molecular genetic testing is considered the "gold standard" of identification studies, as the high discriminatory power of this method allows results to be obtained with a high degree of certainty. However, due to errors at various stages of the expert's work, it can sometimes produce erroneous results that are inconsistent with other parallel investigative methods. The aim of the study was to determine the frequency and causes of errors leading to erroneous results of molecular genetic forensic examination in the Ivano-Frankivsk Scientific Research Forensic Centre of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine from 2019 to 2024. Materials and methods. A retrospective study of 4595 conclusions of forensic molecular-genetic expertise from 2019 to 2024 at the Ivano-Frankivsk Scientific Research Forensic Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine was conducted. Results and discussion. When analysing the reasons for obtaining erroneous results, it was found that human error and contamination were the most frequent causes throughout the study period. Technical problems, sample mix-up and others were less frequent. Conclusions. The indicators and error structure presented in this study are useful for improving the quality and control of the performance of forensic molecular genetic expert testimony, as well as contributing to the formation of an open research culture and helping to find ways to minimise errors. However, it is important to remember that they are not relevant in the context of a specific study. It is also worth considering the possibility of the presence of specific undisclosed errors in a particular case. It is also important to clearly indicate the possibility of DNA transfer, etc. Forensic statistical models, including Bayesian networks, can be useful to account for various uncertainties and to demonstrate their impact on the probative value of forensic molecular genetic expert testimony.