Forehead Flap For Nasal Reconstruction Research Articles

A prospective study of psychological adjustment during and after forehead flap nasal reconstruction

The psychological effects of staged nasal reconstruction with a forehead flap were prospectively investigated.Thirty-three patients underwent nasal reconstruction with forehead flaps between March 2017 and July 2020. Three questionnaires were used to assess psychosocial functioning before surgery (time 1), 1 week after forehead flap transfer (time 2), 1 week after forehead flap division (time 3), and after refinement procedures (time 4). The patients were categorized into three groups according to the severity of nasal defects. Between- and within-group comparisons were conducted.All patients reported increased satisfaction with their appearance during nasal reconstruction. For most patients, levels of distress and social avoidance were highest before reconstruction (time 1). Both levels decreased as reconstruction advanced, and were significantly improved by times 3 and 4. The stage of reconstruction had a greater effect on these levels than did severity of nasal defect.Nasal reconstruction with forehead flap is beneficial physically and psychologically. Psychological evaluation before and after surgery facilitates patient–surgeon interactions and further enhances outcomes.

Handheld Doppler Detection and Light Illumination for Vascular Mapping in Nasal Reconstruction.

The application of the expanded forehead flap in nasal reconstruction has the advantage of being able to provide a sufficient amount of flap and can provide good aesthetic results. For an expanded forehead flap to survive, there must be adequate arterial supply and venous return. Despite this, limited studies have been conducted on preoperative vascular mapping and the design of the expanded forehead flap for nasal reconstruction. In this article, the authors present a technique of hand-held Doppler detection with light illumination for vascular mapping. The study included patients who underwent total nasal reconstruction with expanded forehead flaps between May 2016 and April 2021. The design of the flap was based on the result of preoperative vascular detection by hand-held Doppler detection assisted by light illumination. A total of 32 patients underwent total nasal reconstruction with an expanded forehead flap. The distal part of the flap became necrotic 1 week after the surgery in 2 patients. Following dressing changes and the administration of antibiotics, the distal flap in these patients survived well. No complications were reported in the long term. Hand-held Doppler detection combined with light illumination is a convenient and effective preoperative design method for nasal reconstruction with an expanded forehead flap. All flaps survived well in the long term. Level IV.

Alar Crease Creation Suture in Nasal Reconstruction.

The crescentic alar groove serves as a topographic landmark that frames the ala and separates this convex structure from the surrounding cosmetic subunits. This aesthetic landmark can be attenuated or even obliterated during wound repair in this area. Flaps spanning the alar crease are often noticeably bulky with a pin-cushioned appearance in nasal reconstruction, and it is challenging to reproduce a natural-appearing alar groove. The authors proposed a novel technique with a modified, interrupted inverted horizontal mattress suture to create an alar groove. From March of 2016 to May of 2021, 22 consecutive patients with alar defects who underwent nasal reconstruction with the paramedian forehead flap were identified. All patients underwent the authors' novel technique for the creation of the alar groove. The mean follow-up time was 3 years 7 months (range, 14 months to 5 years). A total of 32 alar crease creation suture operations were performed. All uneven wounds healed uneventfully within 2 weeks. Two cases of postoperative fading alar grooves required alar crease creation sutures to be redone. The authors' novel alar crease creation suture is a safe, straightforward, and reliable technique to create an aesthetic alar groove in forehead flap nasal reconstruction. It can create a medially shallow and laterally deep alar crease without apparent complications. Therapeutic, IV.

A Case of Forehead Flap Nasal Reconstruction for Dog Bite Nasal Injury

A dog bite is the most common trauma among animal bites, and it has varying severity, from simple skin lacerations to defects in whole tissue layers. Considering the aesthetic and functional importance of the nose, an appropriate reconstruction should be conducted for large and full-thickness tissue defects. Although this is quite common, literature detailing surgical reconstruction is lacking, especially in domestic journals. A 45-year-old male patient visited an outpatient clinic due to nasal trauma caused by a dog bite. The patient’s nose showed whole-layer tissue defects, with necrotic tissues at the periphery. Nasal reconstruction surgery was conducted using a forehead flap and ear cartilage composite graft. Pedicle division was conducted three weeks after primary surgery. The functional and aesthetic outcomes of the surgery were satisfactory. Our experience demonstrates that the forehead flap is a useful option for reconstructing a nose badly injured by a dog bite.

Comparison of Hand-Held Doppler and Indocyanine Green Angiography in Preoperative Design of Expanded Forehead Flaps for Nasal Reconstruction.

Despite the different approaches for detection of perforators, methods of vascular mapping of the expanded forehead flap for nasal reconstruction are rarely described. This article aimed to present our experience in the preoperative design of the expanded forehead flap for nasal reconstruction and to compare the clinical practice of hand-held Doppler and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) in vascular mapping for nasal reconstruction with the expanded forehead flap. From October 2019 to April 2022, 26 patients underwent nasal reconstruction using expanded forehead flap. The authors performed preoperative vascular mapping on 16 patients by hand-held Doppler alone, and on 10 patients by hand-held Doppler and ICGA primary outcomes considered were the visualization of the main vascular course of the flap obtained by hand-held Doppler or ICGA, intraoperative observation of the flap, and its postoperative complications. Indocyanine green angiography provides a better detection in distal flap and the branches of the supratrochlear artery. Vein detection by ICGA generally corresponds to the results obtained by the combination of hand-held Doppler and transillumination test. In the group that only used hand-held Doppler, 2 patients presented hemodynamic complications in the margin of the flap and 1 patient presented partial necrosis postoperatively. No complication was found in the group that used ICGA. It is recommended to use the ICGA for preoperative planning, as it yields highly accurate vascular courses. As an alternative to other methods, hand-held Doppler is also an effective tool. IV.

Effectiveness of Nasolabial Flap Versus Paramedian Forehead Flap for Nasal Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Different studies performed on nasal subunit reconstruction by either the nasolabial flap or the paramedian forehead flap have reported contradictory outcomes and complications, claiming one flap or the other as superior. This inconsistency has led to a gap in existing literature regarding the preferable flap for nasal reconstruction. Our aim was to statistically evaluate and compare these two flaps for nasal reconstruction, in terms of subunit preference, complications, and outcomes, using data from previous studies. This systematic review is reported using PRISMA protocol and was registered with the International prospective register of systematic reviews. The literature search was done using "paramedian forehead flap", "nasolabial flap", "melolabial flap", "nasal reconstruction". Data regarding demography of study and population, subunit reconstructed, complications, and aesthetic outcomes were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using MetaXL and summary of findings using GRADEpro GDT. Thirty-eight studies were included, and data from 2036 followed-up patients were extracted for the review. Meta-analysis was done on data from nine studies. Difference in alar reconstruction by forehead versus nasolabial flap is statistically significant [pooled odds ratio (OR) 0.3; 95% CI 0.01, 0.92; p = 0.72; I2 = 0%, n = 6 studies], while for dorsum and columella reconstruction the difference is not statistically significant. Risk of alar notching is marginally more in forehead flap, however difference in incidence of partial/complete flap necrosis, alar notching and hematoma/bleeding among the flaps is not statistically significant. Alar reconstruction is preferred by nasolabial flap. Complications are similar in both groups. Comparison of aesthetic outcome needs further exploration. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Soft tissue reconstruction in traumatic nasal defects by forehead flap: A tertiary care centre experience

Forehead flap is the gold standard for nasal soft tissue reconstruction. The nose is a complex three-dimensional structure and along with the eyes, represents a major aesthetic focus of the face. The aim of this study is to review the use of forehead flap in nasal reconstruction and prospectively evaluate the outcome of treating nasal defects as an easy, effective and economical treatment in the Indian population.Material and Methods: This prospective study was conducted from March 2020 to May 2022. Patients with subtotal nasal defect who were above 18 years of age, and patients who were willing to give informed consent for treatment. Each participant underwent surgical debridement under loupe magnification combined with forehead flap cover after a full clinical assessment.Results: Twenty three participants were included in this study with an age range of 18–62 years with mean age (36.1±8.71). Out of these 6(26.1%) were female and 17(73.9%) were males. The defect were located over the dorsum and lateral nasal wall in 3 participants (13.1%), tip in 2(8.7%) patients, ala in 1(4.3%) patients and involved multiple subunit in 17(73.9%).Conclusion: The forehead flap represents the ideal reconstructive choice in patients with nasal defects. It has good textural, thickness and color match when compared with the recipient site tissues, with minor complications.

VITOM-3D assisted paramedian forehead flap for nasal reconstruction

BackgroundThe study was designed with the purpose of showing the potential advantages of the VITOM-3D assisted paramedian forehead flap for nasal reconstruction. MethodsA 72 years-old female patient presented to our department with a wide left nasal defect. On her clinical history she referred a basal cell carcinoma of the left nasal skin treated with multiple excision in another center without reconstruction. On clinical examination, we observed the absence of the left nasal tip, columella, upper lateral and lower lateral cartilage. In our experience the paramedian forehead flap based on supratrochlear artery is a feasible reconstruction (Shokri, T., et al).The first surgeon (Dr. Placentino) along with the head and neck team decided to reconstruct the nasal defect assisted by the 3D 4 K exoscope (VITOM®; Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany). ResultsThe goal of reconstruction is to carefully evaluate the nasal defects and rebuild the nose as close as possible to its original shape with the multilayer technique, creating the internal lining, the intermediate bony-cartilage structure and external skin. (Kim, I.A., et al). The exoscope allowed us to reconstruct the inner layer with the mucoperiostal septal flap, middle layer with auricular cartilage and the external skin through the elevation of the paramedian forehead flap. The flap is elevated from cranio-caudal direction including skin, subcutaneous tissue, frontalis muscle and associated fascia or periosteum. Donor site was primarily closed with the exception of a small defect. Post-operative period was uneventful, and after a period of 4 weeks when vascularization was complete, the patient underwent pedicle excision. At the recent 6 months follow-up, the flap had healed completely with the shape of nose restored with good symmetry. ConclusionHigh-definition (4 K), three-dimensional (3D) exoscope are being used to perform a growing number of head and neck surgeries (Bartkowiak, E., et al). However, the use of the 3D exoscope in the nasal reconstruction has not been previously described. In our opinion the potential advantages of this technique are, firstly, to achieve a better magnification and to improve the vision of anatomical structure that leads to a better functional and aesthetic result, secondly, to reduce surgical times. High-definition allowed us to highlight the scar tissue and preserve as much healthy tissue as possible. In addition, we underline the use of the exoscope for a better remodeling of cartilage.

The three-stage Forehead Flap: A Gold Standard in Nasal Reconstruction

The causes of nasal defects are dominated by skin tumors; surgical excision of these tumors sometimes leaves a large skin defect, which represents a challenge to the plastic surgeon for reconstruction. In this article, we will describe from a clinical case, the particularities of the three-stage forehead flap in nasal reconstruction as described by F. Menick, and we compare it with the classic technique in terms of aesthetic result.

Forehead flap nasal reconstruction: oncologic and functional outcomes in a regional centre

Forehead flap nasal reconstruction: oncologic and functional outcomes in a regional centre

Two or Three? Approaches to Staging of the Paramedian Forehead Flap for Nasal Reconstruction.

SummaryThe paramedian forehead flap is a historic cornerstone of plastic surgery and a mainstay of complex nasal reconstruction. Although initially described as a 2-stage procedure, several procedural advancements and modifications have been proposed, with the most notable being the addition of a third, intermediate stage. Proponents of this 3-stage approach argue that the addition of an intermediate stage improves flap perfusion, expands lining and structural support options, and provides superior aesthetic outcomes. Although this technique has grown in popularity, studies comparing the 2- versus 3-stage approach are relatively scarce in the literature. Existing comparative studies seem to suggest that the 3-stage paramedian forehead flap may have advantages in large, complex nasal defects and patients at high risk for vascular compromise. Additionally, comparative analyses with respect to aesthetic outcome were found to be largely equivocal, suggesting that surgeon comfort and preference should guide flap selection.

Morbidity Associated With Structural Graft Use in Paramedian Forehead Flap.

Paramedian forehead flap for nasal reconstruction may involve the use of a structural graft. The authors hypothesized that the use of structural grafts with paramedian forehead flap is associated with an increased risk of 30-day complications. This is a retrospective study of the American College of Surgeon (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). We identified all patients undergoing paramedian forehead flap reconstruction from 2007 through 2018 using Current Procedural Terminology code 15731. Patients who had structural graft harvested at the time of paramedian forehead flap were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Groups were defined based on the use of structural grafts. Propensity score matching was performed using preoperative and intraoperative characteristics to produce matched cohorts. The authors further stratified individual graft types to identify differential risks associated with each. Logistic regression was then used to determine whether the use of structural grafts was associated with increased risk for 30-day complications. The authors identified 1198 patients with paramedian forehead flap reconstruction, of whom 325 (27.1%) required structural grafts. Propensity score matching 1:1 yielded 247 patients in each of the matched cohorts. Overall 30-day complications (4.5% versus 5.3%), wound related complications (3.2% versus 4.1%), systemic complications (1.2% versus 2%), unplanned reoperation (6.5% versus 3.2%), and unplanned readmission (6.6% versus 10.2%) were similar between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis of different graft types showed that costochondral graft was associated with increased wound related complications (0.9% versus 8.3%, P = 0.03). The odds of having wound related complications with the use of costochondral graft was OR = 5.3, CI = 1.5-18.8, P = 0.02. Although the use of structural grafts does not increase risk of overall 30-day complications, there is an increased risk of wound related complications associated with the use of costochondral and rib grafts.

Office-Based Forehead Flaps: A Safe and Reliable Reconstructive Option.

Forehead flaps are one of the workhorse flaps for nasal reconstruction, especially for large defects involving the nasal tip, ala, or multiple nasal subunits. Forehead flaps are often performed on older patients who have accompanying comorbidities and who may be at higher risk for anesthetic complications. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the safety and success of forehead flap nasal reconstruction in 2 different clinical settings: those performed under local anesthesia in an office-based procedure room, compared with those performed in the operating room under either general anesthesia or intravenous sedation. A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent forehead flap reconstruction between the years of 2011 and 2018 by the senior author. Patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Patients were followed for 1 year postoperatively or until the end of the study period. Patients were excluded if they had an accompanying unrelated cosmetic procedures performed during first-stage forehead flap reconstruction. A total of 96 forehead flaps were performed, 35 of which (36.5%) were done in an office-based procedure room using local anesthesia only. Patient ages ranged from 45 to 92 years, with an average age of 71.9 years. The majority of flaps (n = 81, 85.3%) were divided at the second-stage procedure. There was no statistically significant difference in time elapsed between first- and second-stage procedures between groups (procedure room: 22.6 days; operating room: 23.8 days). There were 13 total postoperative complications (13.5%), but there was no statistically significant difference in complication rate between groups (office-based: 3 complications, 8.6%; operating room: 10 complications, 16.4%). Our data suggest that forehead flap reconstruction can be done safely with acceptable postoperative results when performed under local anesthesia in an office-based outpatient setting.

The Laterally Extended Paramedian Forehead Flap for Nasal Reconstruction: The Delay Technique Revisited.

Background:Problems with poor circulation often occur when a large defect or a distant region, such as the apex of the nose, is covered with a paramedian forehead flap. Delay technique increases the safety of reconstruction procedures, but it has been used less frequently because a 2-stage surgery is necessary, and various other flaps and techniques have been developed.Method:We performed the delay technique of paramedian forehead flap at the same time as tumor resection. For the flap, a narrow pedicle of about 1-cm was prepared on the supratrochlear artery and vein, and the incision was extended toward the lateral side conforming to the defect morphology, and a paramedian forehead flap with a design consistent with the esthetic unit containing the defect was prepared. The region below the flap was dissected to create the flap bipedicle, and surgery was completed.Result:This procedure was used in 4 patients with malignant tumor of the external nose, and the flap survived perfectly in all patients. The postoperative esthetic outcome was also found to be good.Conclusions:This procedure does not increase the frequency of surgery, circulation in the flap is maintained, the flap pedicle on the supratrochlear artery can be made narrow, and flap thinning can be performed from the beginning. Coverage of an extensive defect is possible because a large flap can be excised, and satisfactory esthetic appearance can be obtained by matching with the esthetic unit. The delay technique for various flaps (not limited to forehead flap alone) should be considered an effective technique for the current treatment of malignant tumors.

The Importance of Expanded Forehead Flap in Nasal Reconstruction

Introduction: Nasal reconstruction is a difficult problembecause it entails reconstruction of skin, cartilage, osseousframe work and lining mucous membrane [1]. The result mustbe satisfactory both cosmetically and functionally [2].The anatomical reconstruction depends on the principleof subunit divisions of the nose. Which states: If the reconstructionis less than the defective subunit the result willappear patchy. On the other hand, if the reconstruction exceedsthe limits of the subunit the nose will appear unnatural [3,4].Local and regional flaps are used in nasal reconstructioneach type has its own advantages, disadvantages and donorsite morbidity [5-9]. The aim of this work is to demonstratethe advantages and disadvantages of expanded forehead flap in nasal reconstruction.Material and Methods: A retrospective review of 25consecutive cases of total or nasal dorsum reconstruction whowere operated upon in a single clinic by 3 separate surgeonsadopting the same principle of expanded forehead flap, betweenJanuary 2010 and January 2017.In this technique the median forehead skin is expandedwith a 200-ml envelope for 6-8 weeks, and then a foreheadflap is incised to match the nasal defect [10].Results: Surgical follow-up varied from a minimum of 6months to a maximum of 2 years with average follow-up of1 year. Among a total of 25 patients, 23 patients (92%)complied with follow-up, and 21 (91%) of these patients weresatisfied. One case only complicated and the expander extrudedand had to be removed.Conclusion: The tint of forehead skin is similar to nasalskin. Forehead flap is well vascularized and is lying adjacentto the nose. Forehead is a multilaminar structure which allowthe usage of skin grafts as inner lining and because of its highvascularity all types of structural support can be used.Expanded forehead flap provides large, excess forehead skinand primary closure of donor site is applicable. During theprocess of expansion, the skin is thinned out so do not needde-fattening and re-contracture do not occur. Therefore,forehead flap is always a good reconstructive option in largenasal defects.

Laser hair removal following forehead flap for nasal reconstruction.

The forehead flap is a dependable option for nasal reconstruction owing to its reliability and anatomic likeness to nasal skin. For patients with low hairlines, the vertical design of the paramedian forehead flap can intrude into the scalp, thus incorporating hair into the nasal reconstruction. The inadequate length of the forehead flap or shift to an oblique design may result in eyebrow elevation and asymmetry. Therefore, laser hair removal (epilation) on the forehead flap has been proposed to improve esthetic results. An alexandrite laser (755nm, 10 to 20ms, 18-mm spot size) with a Dynamic Cooling Device™ (DCD™) cooling system was used for hair removal in 22 patients (16 male and 6 female patients) after nasal reconstructions using forehead flaps from December 2011 to September 2016. All patients received cryogen spray cooling laser treatment (CSC-LT). The mean follow-up period was 24months, with a range between 18 and 50months. The average duration of treatment was 1.8months (range, 1-5months). The energy density ranged from 14 to 18J/cm2 with an average of 17.2J/cm2. The number of treatments ranged from 2 to 4 (mean 2.8). Patients had satisfactory esthetic results over 11.1months (range, 8-18months). Residual white hairs were observed in 3 patients, and 4 patients had tiny black residual hairs without deteriorating cosmesis. Using an alexandrite laser to remove hair on the forehead is safe and reliable in nasal reconstruction with superior recipient site cosmesis.

Revisiting Nasal Reconstruction After Mohs Surgery

Nasal reconstruction after oncologic resection often constitutes a technically demanding task. The aim of this study was to investigate our experience with nasal reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery using the following 3 well-established, versatile, and reliable techniques: the bilobed flap, nasolabial flap, and forehead flap. A single-surgeon retrospective chart review of all patients undergone a bilobed, nasolabial, or forehead flap for nasal reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery from 2003 to 2017 was conducted. Data collected for analysis included demographics and defect characteristics. Revisions and complications were analyzed. A total of 83 patients were included in the study; 52 patients underwent bilobed, 17 patients nasolabial, and 14 patients forehead flaps. All defects involved the middle and lower nasal zones. There was a significant difference in the defect size between the 3 groups (P < 0.001). The mean diameters were as follows: 1.37 cm for the bilobed, 2.22 cm for the nasolabial, and 3.46 cm for the forehead flap groups. Liberal utilization of the bilobed and nasolabial flaps achieved reconstruction of defects larger than typically described in the literature. Reconstruction of all defects, including support for successful restoration of mucosal lining and cartilage when indicated, was achieved. An algorithm dealing with defects larger than 0.5 cm in the middle and distal nasal zones was devised. In this study, the liberal application of the 3 flaps was described based on an individualized treatment approach. The algorithm provides a simplified approach for larger nasal defects in the middle and lower thirds.

Computer-aided design and three-dimensional printing improves symmetry in heminasal reconstruction outcomes

Symmetry and balance in nasal reconstruction can be hard to achieve. Traditionally, a foil template modeled after the unaffected contralateral side is used in the design of a forehead flap. Crude two-dimensional models often generate underwhelming results. To better simulate complex nasal topography, three-dimensional printing technology was applied to nasal reconstruction. Between May 2012 and October 2016, twenty patients underwent forehead flap nasal reconstruction for heminasal deformities. Ten reconstructions were guided with prefabricated three-dimensional templates (CAD/CAM), and ten patients underwent traditional nasal reconstruction without CAD/CAM. In the CAD/CAM group, two templates were printed: contour guide and framework guide. These were a reference for skin flap design and cartilage framework design, respectively. Photographic records and photogrammetry was used to evaluate results. The mean follow-up time was 19.3 months (range, 6 months to 38 months) in the control group and 17.4 months (range, 7 months to 35 months) in the CAD/CAM group. Without CAD/CAM, there was asymmetry in alar width, alar area, nostril height, width and area (p < 0.05) between reconstructed and native structures. In the CAD/CAM group, there were asymmetries of nostril-related parameters only. After quantifying asymmetries as a percentage, the CAD/CAM group demonstrated more symmetric reconstructions, particularly in alar width (p=0.043) and alar area (p=0.003). When CAD/CAM guidance and three-dimensional printing was used, there was greater symmetry between reconstructed and native structures of the nose.

The Paramedian Forehead Flap for Nasal Reconstruction: From Antiquity to Present.

Nasal reconstruction is considered the historic foundation of facial plastic surgery, and the forehead flap remains the workhorse of repair. To recreate both the aesthetic contour and function of the nose, all anatomic layers must be addressed-covering, lining, and structural support. This article reviews the noteworthy history underlying the development of the paramedian forehead flap as the primary tool in reconstruction of large nasal defects while highlighting its implications on modern nasal repair. Current developments in the use of 2-staged paramedian forehead flap reconstruction are examined and a modern technique is presented.

Reply: Simplifying the Forehead Flap for Nasal Reconstruction: A Review of 420 Consecutive Cases.

Reply: Simplifying the Forehead Flap for Nasal Reconstruction: A Review of 420 Consecutive Cases.