FOLFOX In Patients Research Articles

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with atezolizumab, bevacizumab, and FOLFOX for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A translational pilot study.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with atezolizumab, bevacizumab, and FOLFOX for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A translational pilot study.

Efficacy and safety of targeted therapy plus immunotherapy combined with hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (FOLFOX) for unresectable hepatocarcinoma

BACKGROUND The advent of cutting-edge systemic therapies has driven advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and therapeutic strategies with multiple modes of delivery have been shown to be more efficacious than monotherapy. However, the mechanisms underlying this innovative treatment modality have not been elucidated. AIM To evaluate the clinical efficacy of targeted therapy plus immunotherapy combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of FOLFOX in patients with unresectable HCC. METHODS We enrolled 53 patients with unresectable HCC who received a combination of targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and HAIC of FOLFOX between December 2020 and June 2021 and assessed the efficacy and safety of the treatment regimen. RESULTS The objective response rate was 60.4% (32/53), complete response was 24.5% (13/53), partial response was 35.9% (19/53), and stable disease was 39.6% (21/53). The median duration of response and median progression-free survival were 9.1 and 13.9 months, respectively. The surgical conversion rate was 34.0% (18/53), and 1-year overall survival was 83.0% without critical complicating diseases or adverse events (AEs). CONCLUSION The regimen of HAIC of FOLFOX, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy was curative for patients with unresectable HCC, with no serious AEs and a high rate of surgical conversion.

Baseline ctDNA gene alterations as a biomarker of survival after panitumumab and chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Certain genetic alterations and right-sided primary tumor location are associated with resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor (EGFR) treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The phase 3 PARADIGM trial (n = 802) demonstrated longer overall survival with first-line anti-EGFR (panitumumab) versus antivascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) plus modified FOLFOX6 in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC with left-sided primary tumors. This prespecified exploratory biomarker analysis of PARADIGM (n = 733) evaluated the association between circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) gene alterations and efficacy outcomes, focusing on a broad panel of gene alterations associated with resistance to EGFR inhibition, including KRAS, NRAS, PTEN and extracellular domain EGFR mutations, HER2 and MET amplifications, and ALK, RET and NTRK1 fusions. Overall survival was prolonged with panitumumab plus modified FOLFOX6 versus bevacizumab plus modified FOLFOX6 in patients with ctDNA that lacked gene alterations in the panel (that is, negative hyperselected; median in the overall population: 40.7 versus 34.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.92) but was similar or inferior with panitumumab in patients with ctDNA that contained any gene alteration in the panel (19.2 versus 22.2 months; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.53), regardless of tumor sidedness. Negative hyperselection using ctDNA may guide optimal treatment selection in patients with mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov registrations: NCT02394834 and NCT02394795 .

Results from the phase 1b/2 SGNTUC-024 study: Assessment of tucatinib, trastuzumab, and FOLFOX for HER2+ GI cancers.

100 Background: HER2 is overexpressed in various GI tumors. Tucatinib (TUC), which is approved in combination with trastuzumab (Tras) in the US for previously treated RAS WT HER2+ metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor highly selective for HER2. Preliminary safety and antitumor activity results of TUC + trastuzumab + FOLFOX in patients (pts) with HER2+ GI cancers are presented. Methods: The phase 1b/2 SGNTUC-024 (NCT04430738) study evaluated TUC + Tras + FOLFOX in pts with HER2+ metastatic GI cancers in Cohorts 1A, 1B, 1D (pts in Japan), and 2B. For Cohorts 1A, 1B, and 1D (enrolled sequentially), eligible pts had unresectable or metastatic HER2+ GI malignancies, including mCRC. Cohort 2B is still enrolling, and pts with HER2+ mCRC are eligible. Pts received a combination of TUC 150 mg orally twice a day (PO BID; Cohort 1A) or TUC 300 mg PO BID (Cohorts 1B, 1D, and 2B) + Tras + FOLFOX. Pts in Cohort 2B were enrolled to further assess the study regimen. Antidiarrheal prophylaxis was required for Cohort 1D. Results: As of July 10, 2023, 25 pts were treated (5, 11, 7, and 2 in Cohorts 1A, 1B, 1D, and 2B, respectively). In Cohort 1A (TUC 150 mg PO BID), the most common TEAEs were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and proteinuria (each in 60.0% [3/5]). For pts receiving TUC 300 mg PO BID, the most common TEAEs were diarrhea (90.0% [18/20]) and fatigue (65.0% [13/20]). Table 1 presents the overall summary of adverse events. In Cohort 1A, Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to any treatment discontinuation were reported in 40.0% (2/5) pts, with 20.0% (1/5) discontinuing tucatinib. For pts treated with TUC 300 mg, TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation were reported in 35.0% (7/20), with 15.0% (3/20) discontinuing tucatinib. One TEAE leading to death (aspiration) in Cohort 1A was unrelated to study treatment. Grade ≥3 diarrhea was observed in 45.5% (5/11) pts in Cohort 1B; most were observed in elderly pts or pts with gastric, gastroesophageal, or esophageal cancer or pts who were generally noncompliant with antidiarrheal treatment. No grade ≥3 diarrhea was observed in Cohort 1D. Among pts receiving TUC 300 mg, confirmed objective response rate was 83.3% (5/6) for mCRC, 40.0% (4/10) for gastroesophageal cancers, and 0% (0/4) for biliary tract cancer. Conclusions: TUC + Tras + FOLFOX showed manageable safety in the enrolled pt population and preliminary antitumor activity in pts with HER2+ mCRC and gastroesophageal cancer. This regimen will be compared with the standard of care (FOLFOX with or without bevacizumab/cetuximab) in the ongoing randomized, phase 3 study (MOUNTAINEER-03; NCT05253651) for pts with HER2+ RAS WT mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT04430738 . [Table: see text]

BOLD-100-001 (TRIO039): A phase 2 study of BOLD-100 in combination with FOLFOX in patients with advanced mCRC previously treated with FOLFOX/CAPOX—Efficacy and safety analysis.

143 Background: BOLD-100 is a first-in-class metallotherapeutic with a unique multimodal mechanism of action currently in phase 2 clinical development for the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal cancers. Standard treatment options for patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include FOLFOX or CAPOX in first or second line therapy. This study explored the benefit of BOLD-100 + FOLFOX in previously treated mCRC patients. Methods: This prospective, phase 2 study evaluates BOLD-100 + FOLFOX in pts with mCRC. All pts received prior standard treatment, including FOLFOX or CAPOX. Pts received 625 mg/m2 of BOLD-100 + FOLFOX on day 1 of each 14-day cycle and treated until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective is to evaluate PFS, OS, and ORR in treated patients. Disease Control Rate (DCR) was also determined. Results: As of 31Aug2023, 36 pts with advanced mCRC were treated. Median age was 62 years (range 40-78), 56% were women, all pts were ECOG 0 (25%) or 1 (75%). Enrolled pts had a median of 4 prior systemic therapies, including FOLFOX/CAPOX. All but one patient had stage IV disease. On study, pts received a median of 6 cycles of BOLD-100 + FOLFOX [range 1-17]. Five pts remain on treatment with 19 in follow-up. Median PFS was 3.9 [2.7, 5.7] months, median OS 9.6 [6.0, 17] months, ORR 7% [1,20] and DCR 76% [58, 88] in the 29 evaluable pts. Two pts achieved a partial response, and 2 pts had target tumor lesion decreases between 20-29%. Study treatment was well tolerated. Of the 36 treated pts, 33 had 1 or more treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), most common neutropenia (n=17, 47%), nausea (n=15, 42%), vomiting (n=8, 22%), fatigue (n=7, 19%), infusion related reaction (n=7, 19%), and pruritus (n=6, 17%). Most related AEs were grade (G) 1-2. 15 pts (42%) had G3/4 neutropenia. Despite previous oxaliplatin treatment, fewer than 6% of pts reported peripheral neuropathy or peripheral sensory neuropathy and all were G1/2. Conclusions: BOLD-100 + FOLFOX is an active and well-tolerated treatment in this heavily pre-treated Stage IV mCRC study population. There were no new safety signals. The mPFS, mOS, ORR and DCR data demonstrate significant clinical benefit and improvement over the currently available therapies, with minimal treatment emergent neuropathy or significant toxicities. This promising treatment combination should be further studied. Clinical trial information: NCT04421820 .

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed versus oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study

BackgroundHepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has demonstrated promising benefits in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In China, the most frequently used HAIC regimen is oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX). However, arterial infusion of fluorouracil over 46 h was not convenient. Raltitrexed, another antimetabolic agent with a long plasma half-life, allows for shorter infusion durations. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and toxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with HAIC with raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin (RALOX) or FOLFOX in patients with intermediate and advanced HCC. MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled 82 eligible patients from February 2019 to December 2021. Forty patients were treated with FOLFOX HAIC (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 administered on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 infusion for 46 h, every 3 weeks) combined with TKIs and ICIs. Forty-two patients received RALOX HAIC (oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 and raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) combined with TKIs and ICIs. We compared the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profile. ResultsORR was similar between the FOLFOX HAIC and RALOX HAIC groups (42.5% vs 42.5%, P = 0.974). DCR also showed no significant difference between the two groups (87.5% vs 85.7%, P = 0.813). Median PFS was 10.7 months in the FOLFOX HAIC group versus 10.2 months in the RALOX HAIC group (P = 0.41). Median OS was 20.3 months in the FOLFOX HAIC group, compared to 17.7 months in the RALOX HAIC group (P = 0.50). Both groups had similar profiles of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events, including thrombocytopenia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, increased alanine aminotransferase, and leukocytopenia. ConclusionThe effectiveness and safety of HAIC with RALOX were comparable to HAIC with FOLFOX in intermediate and advanced HCC patients.

Impact of primary tumor side on clinical outcomes of first-line cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

Aim: To examine the impact of tumor sidedness on clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with folinic acid/fluorouracil/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4)±cetuximab in the TAILOR trial. Patients & methods: Clinical data from 391 patients were evaluated for tumor sidedness. Results: Patients with left-sided tumors who received cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 had a significantly longer overall survival (medians: 22.0 vs 18.3months; p=0.007) and progression-free survival (medians: 9.3 vs 7.9months; p=0.006) compared with FOLFOX-4 alone. Overall survival (medians: 11.5 vs 9.4months; p=0.664) and progression-free survival (medians: 7.4 vs 4.5months; p=0.068) also improved in patients with right-sided tumors. Conclusion: Adding cetuximab to first-line FOLFOX-4 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer improved clinical outcomes irrespective of primary tumor side.

Second-line bevacizumab plus FOLFOX in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

157 Background: There is a rarity of evidence for retreatment with oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), especially in combination with bevacizumab. This is a retrospective study of second line bevacizumab (Bev) plus FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with adjuvant oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with age older than 18 and histologically confirmed metastatic colorectal cancer treated with second line bevacizumab plus FOLFOX in a single institute between 2015 and 2020 were enrolled. History of previous adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in patients with metachronous metastatic colorectal cancer was analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the second line treatment were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared between patients pretreated with adjuvant oxaliplatin (ReOx) and oxaliplatin-naive patients (control) with the log rank test. Results: A total of 72 patients were included. 23 patients (ReOx) were pretreated with adjuvant oxaliplatin and 49 patients (control) were oxaliplatin-naive before the second line treatment. There was a tendency of younger age in the ReOx group, but not statistically significant. Liver metastasis was significantly more frequent in the control group. The median PFS and OS in the ReOx group and the control group were 4.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.67–21.50) versus 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.23–8.20, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84), and 10.5 months (95% CI, 5.40–30.37) versus 9.4 months (95% CI, 6.00–14.9, HR = 1.01) respectively. There was no significant difference of PFS ( p= 0.523) and OS ( p= 0.9745) between two groups. Conclusions: This study suggests a potential survival benefit of bevacizumab plus FOLFOX for mCRC patients previously treated with adjuvant oxaliplatin-containing treatment comparable to oxaliplatin-naive patients. [Table: see text]

Genetic profiling analysis design of well-differentiated aggressive grade 2 and 3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the phase III randomized controlled COMPOSE trial.

TPS660 Background: Deeper comprehension of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET) characteristics has led to development of therapeutic interventions such as targeted radionuclide therapies (TRT). In the prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-center, Phase III COMPOSE trial, the radiolabeled somatostatin analogue 177Lu-edotreotide will be compared to approved standard of care with everolimus, CAPTEM or FOLFOX in patients with well-differentiated aggressive grade 2 and 3 (Ki-67 index 15−55%), somatostatin receptor positive GEP-NETS. While TRT is advantageous, a key unmet need is to identify additional markers intended to guide patient selection for TRT. This is highly relevant as TRT is a therapy of growing interest likely to be broadly available for patients with variable phenotypes. Profiling analysis as part of COMPOSE plans to analyze the genetic signature of GEP-NETS through full exome sequencing and gene expression analysis of tumor histology and longitudinal blood samples. This analysis may guide detection of pathogenic mutations in NET patients, to potentially inform treatment and surveillance strategies. Methods: Whole exome analysis of tumor-suppressor- and proto-oncogenes included in several pan-cancer panels, upstream and downstream regulators, and novel candidate genes, will be studied. Following patient consent, historical tumor biopsy and blood samples will undergo genetic analysis. Genetic profiling analysis inclusion will not impact trial involvement or disease management. DNA will be assessed to determine the impact of different types of mutations; mRNA will be assessed to confirm and quantify these assumptions and compare gene expression at different treatment phases. Samples will be analyzed in a central pathology laboratory. The aim of this analysis is to develop software that would integrate genetic data with structural and functional imaging, histopathology and phenotype information for implementation into clinical practice. Clinical trial information: NCT04919226 .

Outcomes Following Treatment with FOLFOX for Patients with Resectable or Potentially Resectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Population-based Cohort Study

AimsTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based combination chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to extrahepatic sites. Materials and methodsWe conducted a population-based retrospective study examining the safety and effectiveness of perioperative oxaliplatin for resectable or potentially resectable colorectal metastases in Ontario, Canada. Outcomes were also compared with patients with liver-only metastases. Patients received oxaliplatin for mCRC between 1 January 2013 and 30 June 2020. ResultsIn total, 192 patients had extrahepatic metastases. Seventy per cent had R0 metastasectomy. The 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 62% and 79%, respectively; <4% of patients died within 60 days of metastasectomy and 74–90% of patients received treatment according to recommendations from a multidisciplinary setting. Compared with liver-only controls (n = 1306), patients had mCRC to the lung only (n = 115), lung and liver (n = 55) and liver with non-pulmonary site (n = 22). Extrahepatic metastases were more likely to be found for patients whose primary colorectal resection had positive margins (14% versus 7%, P = 0.005) and primary tumours located in the rectum [odds ratio 4.01 (2.31–6.97)]. After adjustment, there was no difference in overall survival between liver-only controls and patients with lung-only [hazard ratio 0.82 (0.59–1.15)] or liver and lung metastases [hazard ratio 1.26 (0.85–1.87)] (P = 0.24). In total, 79/115 (69%) of patients with lung-only metastases had a metastasectomy compared with 645/1306 (49%) and 15/55 (27%) of patients with liver-only and liver and lung metastases, respectively. Hospital visits were similar between patients with liver-only and extrahepatic metastases. ConclusionOxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for patients with resectable or potentially resectable mCRC with extrahepatic metastases was safe and resulted in similar outcomes in appropriately selected patients when compared with patients with liver-only metastases.

Abstract A017: Phase 1b Study of 2nd line vactosertib plus oxaliplatin with 5FU/LV (FOLFOX) in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who have failed first-line gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel

Abstract Background: Despite of recent advances in chemotherapies, PDAC remains aggressive malignancies and the leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. TGF-β is strongly involved in the tumor microenvironment in PDAC, and dysregulation of TGF-β signaling is a frequent molecular disturbance in progression and metastasis. Vactosertib is an orally bioavailable TGF-β signaling inhibitor that targets the TGF-β type I receptor kinase. In in vivo studies, vactosertib in combination with FOLFOX improves pancreatic cancer survival by suppressing cell migration, invasion, and EMT, highlighting a potential clinical application of this approach for PDAC patients. Based on this preclinical study, we develop a phase 1b study to determine the RP2D and to evaluate the safety of vactosertib in combination with FOLFOX in patients with metastatic PDAC who have failed first-line gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel. Methods: Eligible patients have histologically confirmed PDAC who have failed first-line gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel with adequate organ function and performance status. This study is composed of two parts; dose escalation and dose expansion. In the dose escalation part, different dose levels of vactosertib (50 mg bid, 100 mg bid, and 200 mg bid) for escalation were tested, starting with dose level 0 (DL 0, 100 mg bid) with 3 to 6 subjects recruited in each cohort. DL -1 was only planned to test when DL 0 was unacceptable. In the dose expansion part, an additional backfill cohort was planned to open for determination of the final RP2D. Patients in each cohort were planned to receive vactosertib 50-200 mg orally twice per day 1-5 &amp; day 8-12 with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, LV 200mg/m2 IV on day 1, 5FU 200mg/m2 bolus on day 1 and continuous 5-FU 2400mg/m2 infusion over 48 hours every 2 weeks. The primary endpoints were to determine RP2D and to evaluate safety of this combination. The key secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) based on RECIST 1.1 and overall survival. Results: A total of 16 patients were enrolled, 3 in DL 0, 4 in DL 1 and 9 in DL 1 backfill cohort. No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed and the RP2D was established as vactosertib 200 mg orally twice per day 1-5 &amp; day 8-12 with FOLFOX. The vactosertib related adverse events (AEs) of any grade included fatigue, nausea, vomiting and anorexia. Three of 13 patients (23.1%) had partial response and 5 (38.5%) stable disease as best response, with clinical benefit rate of 61.5 % in DL 1, while there were no PR or SD in DL 0. Median PFS was 4.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3–7.1] and median OS was 9.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.86–13.7]. Conclusion: In this phase Ib study, we demonstrated the feasibility and safety of adding vactosertib to FOLFOX in 2nd line setting, which needs to be further investigated. Updated results, including PK analyses, safety profiles, and clinical outcomes will be presented. This study was prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03666832. Citation Format: Joon Oh Park, Seung Tae Kim, Eunji Hong, Jung Yong Hong, Young Suk Park, Seong-Jin Kim. Phase 1b Study of 2nd line vactosertib plus oxaliplatin with 5FU/LV (FOLFOX) in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who have failed first-line gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2022 Sep 13-16; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(22 Suppl):Abstract nr A017.

Phase 1b study of vactosertib in combination with oxaliplatin with 5FU/LV (FOLFOX) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have failed first-line gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel.

e16299 Background: TGF-β is strongly involved in the tumor microenvironment of PDAC, and dysregulation of TGF-β signaling is a frequent molecular disturbance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) progression and metastasis. Vactosertib is an orally bioavailable TGF-β signaling inhibitor that targets the TGF-β type I receptor kinase. In preclinical studies, vactosertib in combination with FOLFOX improves pancreatic cancer survival by suppressing cell migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), highlighting a potential clinical application of this approach for PDAC patients. We performed a phase 1b study to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to evaluate the safety of vactosertib in combination with FOLFOX in patients with metastatic PDAC who have failed first-line gemcitabine/ nab-paclitaxel. Methods: Eligible patients have histologically confirmed PDAC who have failed first-line gemcitabine/ nab-paclitaxel with adequate organ function and performance status. This study is composed of two parts; dose escalation and dose expansion. In the dose escalation part (phase 1b), different dose levels of vactosertib (50 mg bid, 100 mg bid, and 200 mg bid) for escalation were tested, starting with dose level 0 (DL 0, 100 mg bid) with 3 to 6 subjects recruited in each cohort. DL -1 was only planned to test when DL 0 was unacceptable. In the dose expansion part, an additional backfill cohort was planned to open for determination of the final RP2D. Patients in each cohort were planned to receive vactosertib 50-200 mg orally twice per day 1-5 &amp; day 8-12 with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, LV 200mg/m2 IV on day 1, 5FU 200mg/m2 bolus on day 1 and continuous 5-FU 2400mg/m2 infusion over 48 hours every 2 weeks. The primary endpoints were to determine RP2D and to evaluate safety of this combination. The key secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) based on RECIST 1.1 and overall survival. Results: A total of 16 patients were enrolled, 3 in DL 0, 4 in DL 1 and 9 in DL 1 backfill cohort. No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed and the RP2D was established as vactosertib 200 mg orally twice per day 1-5 &amp; day 8-12 with FOLFOX. The vactosertib related adverse events (AEs) of any grade included fatigue, nausea, vomiting and anorexia. Three of 13 patients (23.1%) had partial response and 5 (38.5%) stable disease as best response, with clinical benefit rate of 61.5 % in DL 1, while there were no PR or SD in DL 0. Median PFS was 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.27–8.93]. Conclusions: In this phase Ib study, we demonstrated the feasibility and safety of adding vactosertib to FOLFOX in 2nd line setting, which needs to be further investigated. Updated results, including PK analyses, safety profiles, ORR, PFS and overall survival, will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03666832.

Development and validation of a predictive score to identify K-Ras wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who are likely to benefit from Panitumumab (P) treatment.

e15526 Background: Practice guidelines recommend using P to treat K-Ras WT mCRC patients where it was shown to significantly extend overall survival (OS). Still, a proportion of patients will not achieve this goal. We propose a simplified predictive score to identify patients who are likely to benefit from P treatment. Methods: NCT00364013 was used as training dataset (TRS) (n = 460) with NCT00339183 (TES1) (n = 479) and NCT00113763 (TES2) (n = 191) as validations sets. Datasets were obtained from www.projectdatasphere.org and included K-Ras WT mCRC patients treated with P in combination or not with FOLFOX4 (FOL) or FOLFIRI as 1st, 2nd, or 3rd line therapy. TRS was used to generate synthetic representations (SRs) for each patient through the integration of 36 clinical and analytical features collected, respectively, during the screening phase and the first month of inclusion. These SRs were then input into a deep learning framework (DLF) to identify subgroup of patients based on their similarities. The resultant subpopulations were correlated with OS. Differential variables between subgroups were identified through feature contribution analysis and included in a multivariable logistic regression model. Independent predictive factors found to be statistically significant were used to generate a predictive score of P response at baseline that was validated in the test sets. Results: DLF identified two different subpopulations: SPA (n = 162) and SPB (n = 298). Patients in SPA had a lower risk of death when treated with P/FOL compared to FOL (HR 0.68 95%CI 0.48-0.99; p = 0.04). Patients in SPB showed no significant differences between P/FOL and FOL (p = 0.27). Feature contribution analysis identified 15 differential features between both subpopulations. From these, CEA &gt; 174 ng/ml, ALP &gt; 131 IU, LDH &gt; 703 IU, and platelets &gt; 374 109/L were selected to create a simplified predictive score for P response ranging 0-18 (if &gt; than the depicted values: 6.5 points for CEA, 5.5 for LDH, and 3 points for each other characteristic). When applied to TRS, this score yielded an area under the curve of 0.87 (95%CI: 0.84-0.91). A score ≥8.5 was positively correlated to a longer OS after P/FOL compared to FOL (HR 0.65 95%CI 0.43-0.98; p = .04). No significant differences were observed between P/FOL and FOL in patients with a score &lt; 8.5 (p = 0.89). The predictive score was then validated in the two test sets with similar results (score ≥8.5, TES1: HR 0.59 95%CI 0.40-0.88 p = .009; TES2: HR: HR 0.58 95%CI 0.35-0.96 p = .03; score &lt; 8.5, TES1: p = .5; TES2: p = .1). Conclusions: Based on CEA, ALP, LDH and platelet baseline levels, this easily applicable predictive score might be helpful to accurately select K-Ras WT mCRC patients who would benefit from P treatment. Further work is required to validate this approach in prospective cohorts of patients.

433P Durvalumab and tremelimumab in combination with FOLFOX in patients with previously untreated RAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: First results of efficacy at one year for phase II MEDITREME trial

Single agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition is not effective in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) with microsatellite stable tumors. Signal of efficacy was shown using anti-PD-L1 and anti CTLA-4 in multitreated patients. FOLFOX regimen could induced immunogenic cell death, leading to a potential positive effect on antitumor immune response.

P1-9 Retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX in patients with esophageal cancer

P1-9 Retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX in patients with esophageal cancer

Efficacy of FOLFOX in Patients with Aggressive Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors After Prior Capecitabine/Temozolomide.

5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) has activity in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), but its use is limited, partly because of toxicities. pNETs can often become aggressive over time. We evaluated the efficacy of FOLFOX in patients with aggressive pNETs who had progressed after capecitabine plus temozolomide (cap/tem) among other treatments. This was a retrospective study of all patients with well-differentiated metastatic pNETs, treated at an academic cancer center between January 2008 and June 2019, who received FOLFOX and had received cap/tem in the past. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Thirty-one patients met eligibility criteria. Twenty-five received FOLFOX, and six received FOLFOX with bevacizumab. Patients were heavily pretreated, having received a median of three prior lines of systemic therapy prior to FOLFOX (range, 1-8). Three (9.7%) patients had grade [G]1 tumors, 16 (51.6%) had G2, and 6 (19.4%) had G3, and grade was unspecified in 6 (19.4%) patients. Fourteen (45.2%) exhibited a best response of partial radiographic response per RECIST 1.1 criteria, 15 (48.4%) stable disease, and 2 (6.4%) progressive disease; overall response rate was 45.2% and disease control rate was 93.5%. Median progression-free survival was 6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0-7.0), and median overall survival was 16 months from onset of study treatment (95% CI, 11.3-20.7) and 67 months from date of diagnosis (95% CI, 49.8-84.2). Median duration of treatment was 3 months, and median duration of response was 2 months. Toxicity profile was consistent with known adverse events associated with this regimen. FOLFOX is active in aggressive, heavily pretreated pNETs that have progressed on prior cap/tem chemotherapy; response durations are relatively short. FOLFOX chemotherapy has robust activity in patients with rapidly progressive, heavily pretreated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), a setting in which few, if any, other options are likely to be effective. Durations of response, however, are relatively short, and new treatments are urgently needed for patients with aggressive transformation of pancreatic NETs.

457P 1st-line panitumumab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX for patients with RAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer in Germany: Interim results of the non-interventional study VALIDATE

The metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) prognostic score (mCCS) predicts overall survival (OS) of patients (pts) with mCRC at start of 1st-line therapy (Marschner N, et al. Colorectal Dis. 2019). Based on 5 clinical routine parameters, i.e. tumor stage, tumor grading and lymph node (LN) ratio (affected LNs / total number of resected LNs) at primary diagnosis, primary tumor resectability and number of metastatic sites at start of 1st-line treatment, pts were assigned to three prognostic risk groups with decreasing OS from low to intermediate and high risk group.

Durvalumab and tremelimumab in combination with FOLFOX in patients with RAS-mutated, microsatellite-stable, previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Results of the first intermediate analysis of the phase Ib/II MEDETREME trial.

3006 Background: Single agent PD-1/L1 inhibition are not effective in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) with microsatellite stable tumors. However, signal of efficacy was shown using combo therapy of anti-PD-L1 and anti CTLA-4 in multitreated patients. FOLFOX regimen could induced immunogenic cell death and elimination of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) thus leading to a potential positive effect on antitumor immune response. Methods: This is a single arm exploratory investigator-initiated trial planned to include 57 pts to receive mFOLFOX6 (6cycles) in combination with durvalumab (150mg/q2W) and tremelimumab (75mg/q4W). After 6 cycles of chemotherapy, patients are treated with durvalumab untils progression. Primary endpoint is 6 months’ progression-free survival rate. Secondary endpoints are response rate, tolerability and translational research evaluating tissue and blood immune parameter. Upon Simon’s design an efficacy intermediate analysis was planned after the 16th patient has passed 6 months. Results: As of 1st of January 2020 the 55/57 pts were enrolled and treated with the MEDETREME regimen at 8 French sites. The intermediate efficacy analysis was conducted on the 1st of January after a median of 13.4 months of treatment. The following adverse events were noted: asthenia (81.25%), neuropathy (87.5%), diarrhea (56.25%) and neutropenia (62.5%). Notable grade 3/4 (CTC AE 4.03) include asthenia (18.75%) diarrhea (12.5%) neutropenia (50%) and elevated blood pressure (25%). Most of adverse events were related to chemotherapy. It has been noted one cytolysis grade 3, one thyroid dysfunction grade 3 and one hypophysitis grade 3 related to immunotherapy. Median PFS was not reached. Progression free survival at 6 months was observed in 10/16 pts (62,5%) given 5 CR, 5 PR and 4 SD. Updated translational data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: The interim safety analysis has supported safety and efficacy of the MEDITREME regimen in first- line MCRC. Finally, results will be presented after maturation of follow up. Clinical trial information: NCT03202758 .

Biweekly Cetuximab Plus FOLFOX6 as First-Line Therapy in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The CEBIFOX Trial

BackgroundThe multicenter, single-arm, phase II study CEBIFOX evaluated the efficacy of a biweekly cetuximab administration in combination with FOLFOX6 as first-line therapy in KRAS (exon 2) wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and methodsPatients received FOLFOX6 with cetuximab (500 mg/m2) every second week. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), among others secondary endpoints were safety, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and patient-reported outcome (PRO). The impact on the treatment efficacy was evaluated in explorative subgroup analyses, including extended molecular profiling and primary tumor location. ResultsIn total, 57 were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses. New RAS mutations were detected in 14.0% by post hoc next-generation sequencing analysis in 43 patients. The ORR in the all RASwt population was 70.3% with a median PFS and OS of 10.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.0-12.9) and 33.8 (95% CI, 21.1-45.5) months. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 66.7% of the ITT, without significant impact on the PRO. Patients with right-sided primary tumors had a reduced ORR (54.5%), and median PFS and OS (10.1 and 23.8 months). BRAF mutations were detected in 11.3%. These patients had a significantly lower ORR, and median PFS and OS. Patients with RASwt/BRAFwt tumors had a notably high median PFS and OS of 14.3 and 38.9 months. ConclusionsThis study supports the efficacy and safety of biweekly cetuximab given in combination with FOLFOX6 in patients with RASwt/BRAFwt mCRC with left-sided primary tumor. CEBIFOX is the first trial reporting the complete dataset, including extended molecular profiling and tumor location of a biweekly administered cetuximab/FOLFOX6 in mCRC. Clinical trial number: NCT01051167.

Avelumab and cetuximab in combination with FOLFOX in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Final results of the phase II AVETUX trial (AIO-KRK-0216).

96 Background: Single agent PD-1/L1 inhibition is efficacious in MCRC patients (pts) with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). For the vast majority of MCRC pts with MS stable (MSS) phenotype the role of immunotherapy remains undetermined. Methods: The single arm phase II AVETUX trial combined mFOLFOX6 and cetuximab with avelumab (10mg/kg day 1 from cycle 2 onwards) in RAS/BRAF wildtype (local lab) MCRC pts. Primary endpoint was 12 month progression-free survival rate. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), tolerability, overall survival and translational research evaluating tissue including PD-L1 expression (tumour/immune cells) and serial ctDNA. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat (ITT). Results: Overall 43 pts were enrolled. Median age was 61 (range 29-82), 14 pts (33%) were female and 39 (91%) left sided. 30 pts (70%) had liver mets and 17 (40%) liver mets only. 2 pts were MSI-H, one MSI-low and 40 MSS. Besides immediate and otherwise unexplained fever in 4 pts treatment was well tolerated and avelumab was not associated with unexpected adverse events to standard FOLFOX/cetuximab. Central tissue review found 4 pts to be ineligible due to low frequent KRAS or BRAF mutation (15-31%). Thus, ITT included 39 pts. The ORR was 79.5%, including 6 complete (CR) and 25 partial responses (PR). Further 5 stable diseases were noted, thus disease control rate was 92.3%; 2 pts had progression and 1 was not evaluable. Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) rate (≥20% after 8 weeks) was 79.5% (1 CR, 27 PR and 3 SD with ≥20% - &lt; 30%). In MSI-H pts 1 PR and 1 SD and in the 3 low RAS mut pts 2 PR were noted. Panel sequencing was feasible with 153 mutations detected, showing an immediate ctDNA drop within 4 weeks of treatment, mirroring the high rate of early tumor response. Notably, the 4 pts with fever had a high T cell infiltration in the tumor. Final data including the primary endpoint and translational data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: The AVETUX regimen was feasible producing a high rate of responses in MSS pts mainly occurring within the first 8 weeks. The noted ORR/ETS of 79.5% warrants further evaluation in a randomized trial. Clinical trial information: NCT03174405.