FOLFOX Regimen Research Articles

Tolerability of perioperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer in real clinical practice

Background. The choice of the optimal scheme of perioperative chemotherapy of locally advanced gastric cancer is an urgent problem in real clinical practice. Aim. To analyze therapy tolerability in this cohort of patients. Materials and methods. Perioperative chemotherapy of gastric cancer was performed in 90 patients in the Chemotherapy Department of the Oncology Center №1 of the Yudin City Clinical Hospital from January 2021 to February 2024. Results. The incidence of severe complications at the preoperative stage was 41.9% for the FOLFOX regimen and 40.7% for the FLOT regimen, at the adjuvant stage – 17.4 and 43.2%, respectively. Operative treatment was successfully performed in 79 (87.8%) patients, and the full scope of combined treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer was completed in 59 (65%) patients. 80.8% of pathomorphologic responses in the FOLFOX group and 67.9% in the FLOT group were TRG3-4, with complete response noted in only one patient. Conclusion. High toxicity rates in elderly and comorbid patients on the FOLFOX regimen require the development of an individualized approach to the treatment of this group of patients.

P1-8 Definitive chemoradiation with Folfox regimen in locally advanced middle-lower third esophageal cancer in Vietnam

P1-8 Definitive chemoradiation with Folfox regimen in locally advanced middle-lower third esophageal cancer in Vietnam

982P HILL: The efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with FOLFOX regimen combine lenvatinib and durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective, phase II, single-armed, clinical trial

982P HILL: The efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with FOLFOX regimen combine lenvatinib and durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective, phase II, single-armed, clinical trial

Predicting Indeterminate Lesion Turned to Distance Metastasis in Patients with Rectal Cancer Undergoing Curative Resection after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy

Objectives: It is controversial about factors associated with indeterminate lesion turned to be malignant lesion after preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CCRT) in rectal cancer that may cause over-treating and over-diagnosing. So, The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of indeterminate pulmonary nodules or liver nodule at primary staging CT and risk of indeterminate lesion being malignant to help better understanding of indeterminate lesion in rectal cancer undergoing preoperative CCRT and proper treatment. Methods: A total of 679 patients with rectal cancer were assessed from January 2015 to December 2019. 152 patients with rectal cancer undergoing curative resection after preoperative CRT were included. Associated factors were reviewed for their effect on metastasis. The median follow-up time was 28 months. Results: Of 152 patients, The prevalence of indeterminate lesion was 3.29% and turned to be malignant around 40% of patients. The clinical N2, preoperative FOLFOX regimen, No clinical response were significantly higher in malignant group (p 0.03, <0.001 and 0.003, respectively). Conclusions: Such a low incidence of indeterminate lesion should not cause further preoperative diagnostic workup besides routine regimens. In addition, it is not necessary to perform excessive surveillance routinely for all rectal cancer patients underwent preoperative CCRT who have indeterminate lesion. Intensive follow up chest CT or invasive diagnosis modalities should be considered in patients who had clinical stage N2, receiving preoperative FOLFOX4 regimen and no clinical response after preoperative CCRT.

Safety of first-line systemic therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety of first-line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer through network meta-analysis.MethodsThe literature from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was searched from the inception of the databases to August 15, 2023, and strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to screen studies. The Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool (RoB 2.0) was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature. Network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 15.0 and R4.3.1 software to compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) among different treatment regimens.ResultsA total of 53 randomized controlled trials, involving 17,351 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), were ultimately included, encompassing 29 different therapeutic approaches. According to SUCRA rankings, the CAPOX regimen is most likely to rank first in terms of safety, while the FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab regimen is most likely to rank last. In terms of specific AEs, the CAPOX regimen, whether used alone or in combination with targeted drugs (bevacizumab and cetuximab), is associated with a reduced risk of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, as well as an increased risk of thrombocytopenia and diarrhea. The FOLFOX regimen, with or without bevacizumab, is linked to an increased risk of neutropenia and peripheral sensory neuropathy. The FOLFIRI/CAPIRI + bevacizumab regimen is associated with a reduced risk of peripheral sensory neuropathy. S-1 and S-1 + oxaliplatin are well-tolerated in terms of gastrointestinal reactions. The FOLFOXIRI regimen, whether used alone or in combination with targeted drugs, is associated with various AEs.ConclusionIn summary, the CAPOX regimen may be the safest option among the first-line systemic treatment regimens for mCRC patients, while the FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab regimen may be associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs.

Second line chemotherapy for advanced biliary cancer: FOLFOX versus FOLFIRI: Analysis of retrospective and prospective data

Aim. To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of second-line polychemotherapy according to FOLFOX or FOLFIRI regimen in patients with biliary tract tumours after progression during first-line chemotherapy (CT). Materials and methods. The study is based on the analysis of retrospective and prospective data on the examination and treatment of 94 patients with biliary cancer of grades T1-4N0-2M0-1 followed-up and treated at the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology from 2015 to 2023. All patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (FOLFOX, n=47) and Group 2 (FOLFIRI, n=47). In Group 1, patients received the recommended FOLFOX second-line CT regimen. Patients in Group 2 received FOLFIRI regimen. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events. Results. The study included 94 patients. In the FOLFOX group, the median OS was 13.0 months (1-year OS was 57.8±7.4%); for the FOLFIRI group, the median OS was 12.3 months (1-year OS was 54.4±7.3%). The toxicity profiles of FOLFOX and FOLFIRI were acceptable and consistent with those reported for the regimens. According to the grade 3–4 toxicity data, diarrhea was significantly more common in the FOLFIRI group (p=0.014), and neurotoxicity was more common in the FOLFOX group (p=0.006). During the second-line CT, the frequency of grade 1–4 toxicities in the groups did not differ: 18 (38.3%) events in the FOLFOX group and 19 (40.0%) events in the FOLFIRI group. Conclusion. Our results of evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of the second-line polychemotherapy regimens show that the FOLFOX and FOLFIRI CT regimens have equal efficacy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer with a good performance according to the ECOG scale, who previously received the first-line therapy with a combination of gemcitabine with a platinum agent (cisplatin or oxaliplatin); also, our data demonstrate similar toxicity profiles of these regimens.

Is There any Benefit of Addition of Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy (FOLFOX4) to Standard Preoperative Treatment of Rectal Cancer? A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) before surgical intervention represents a unique therapeutic approach for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and has witnessed a notable rise in utilization within recent years. However, the efficacy and safety of this treatment remain subjects of ongoing debate and investigation. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the potential impact of administering induction chemotherapy (IC) before the conventional neoadjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in LARC patients. patients with resectable stage II-III LARC were randomly allocated to receive either biweekly 6 cycles of FOLFOX4 regimen as IC followed by CRT and total mesorectal excision (TME) (experimental group) or nCRT followed by TME (control group). The primary endpoint was the rate of pathological complete response (pCR). The secondary endpoints encompassed the evaluation of treatment-related adverse events as well as the assessment of survival outcomes. 67 patients were enrolled in this study (32 in the experimental group and 35 in the control group). The median age of the patients was 45 years. Stage IIIB was observed in 46.3% of the patients. The patients who underwent induction chemotherapy demonstrated a notably higher rate of achieving pCR in comparison to the control group (28.1% vs 8.6%; P=0.001). There were no statistically significant differences observed in terms of their toxicity profile and survival outcomes. Implementation of induction chemotherapy utilizing the FOLFOX4 regimen has demonstrated a notable enhancement in the rate of pathological complete response. However, this improvement does not appear to translate into significant advancements in overall survival outcomes.

Effect of cetuximab plus FOLFOX4 regimen on clinical outcomes in advanced gastric carcinoma patients receiving evidence-based care

BACKGROUND Although chemotherapy is effective for treating advanced gastric carcinoma (aGC), it may lead to an adverse prognosis. Establishing a highly effective and low-toxicity chemotherapy regimen is necessary for improving efficacy and outcomes in aGC patients. AIM To determine the efficacy and safety of cetuximab (CET) combined with the FOLFOX4 regimen (infusional fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin) as first-line therapy for patients with aGC, who received evidence-based care (EBC). METHODS A total of 117 aGC patients who received EBC from March 2019 to March 2022 were enrolled. Of these, 60 in the research group (RG) received CET + FOLFOX4 as first-line therapy, whereas 57 in the control group (CG) received FOLFOX4. The efficacy [clinical response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR)], safety (liver and kidney dysfunction, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, rash, and diarrhea), serum tumor marker expression [STMs; carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, CA72-4, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)], inflammatory indicators [interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-10], and quality of life (QOL) of the two groups were compared. RESULTS A markedly higher RR and DCR were observed in the RG compared with the CG, with an equivalent safety profile between the two groups. RG exhibited notably reduced CA19-9, CA72-4, CEA, and IL-2 levels following treatment, which were lower than the pre-treatment levels and those in the CG. Post-treatment IL-10 was statistically increased in RG, higher than the pre-treatment level and the CG. Moreover, a significantly improved QOL was evident in the RG. CONCLUSION The CET + FOLFOX4 regimen is highly effective as first-line treatment for aGC patients receiving EBC. It facilitates the suppression of STMs, ameliorates the serum inflammatory microenvironment, and enhances QOL, without increased adverse drug effects.

FOLFOX as a therapeutic option in patients with hepatic failure due to liver metastasis of gastrointestinal (GI) system malignancies: A case series.

e16378 Background: The treatment options for patients with hepatic metastasis presenting with liver dysfunction, particularly those experiencing severe hyperbilirubinemia, are limited. The oxaliplatin and fluorouracil/folinic acid regimen, known as FOLFOX, stands out as a viable option based on its pharmacokinetics. However, clinical data regarding the specific dosage and tolerability of this regimen are limited, and clear recommendations are not currently available. Patients and Methods: Patients who presented with severe hyperbilirubinemia immediately after the diagnosis of GI adeno cancer, and who were not eligible for drainage options, were prospectively observed in our clinic in Turkey throughout the year 2023. Severe hyperbilirubinemia was defined as a bilirubin level > 5mg/dL. The FOLFOX regimen was administered every two weeks, and the fluorouracil dose was initially reduced by 50% for the first two cycles. Subsequently, the dose was increased to the total amount if no toxicity occurred. Results: Six cases of GI cancer patients meeting the criteria were identified. Subsequent laboratory data for these six patients were collected after initiating the FOLFOX regimen. All six patients underwent the FOLFOX regimen with dose reduction for the first two cycles. Following the first cycle of chemotherapy, bilirubin levels dropped and normalized (Table 1), leading to an improvement in the patients' clinical condition. Conclusions: While our series is limited by a small number of patients, treatment with FOLFOX has proven to be feasible and may yield significant benefits in patients with severe liver dysfunction caused by GI cancer, especially when no further drainage options are available. [Table: see text]

Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI versus mFOLFOX6 in MRD-positive stage II-III colorectal cancer.

TPS3642 Background: About 25% to 30% of resectable high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancers might relapse after radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX regimen. Recent studies have underscored the significance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based minimal residual disease (MRD), representing a residual presence of cancer cells, as a prognostic factor for postoperative recurrence in CRC. Patients exhibiting positive MRD predicted a considerable high risk of recurrence and metastasis, even after adjuvant chemotherapy. In the realm of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, Comparing with FOLFOX, whether the early introduction of intensified chemotherapy, mFOLFOXIRI, could further eradicate MRD and improve the long-term prognosis remains unclear. Methods: This multicenter phase III study (NCT05427669) plans to enroll 340 colorectal cancer patients with MRD positive after curative-intent R0 surgical resection, age 18 to 70 years, ECOG performance status 0-1. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive mFOLFOXIRI (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², irinotecan 150 mg/m², and 5-FU 2.4 g/m²over 46 h) or mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m2 then 2.4 g/m² over 46 h) every two weeks for 24 weeks (12 cycles). Patients will be followed for 5 years after the end of adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was 3-year DFS. A gain of 14% in 3-yr DFS is expected (74% in the experimental arm vs. 60% in the control arm; α, 5% [two-sided log-rank test]; 1-β, 80%). Secondary endpoints included overall survival, 3-year distant metastasis-free survival, QoL and toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT05427669 .

Trifluridine/tipiracil + oxaliplatin ± nivolumab vs FOLFOX ± nivolumab in HER2 negative advanced oesogastric adenocarcinoma: The PRODIGE73-UCGI40-LOGICAN trial

BackgroundTrifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is approved in third-line treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (aGA/GEJA). The association of oxaliplatin with FTD/TPI is promising and the combination of FTD/TPI + oxaliplatin + nivolumab has shown a predictable and manageable safety profile. AimsThe aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI plus oxaliplatin with or without nivolumab in patients, with HER2 negative aGA/GEJA, unfit for triplet chemotherapy (TFOX/mFLOT regimen), in the first-line metastatic setting in comparison with the standard of care FOLFOX with or without nivolumab. MethodsThis study is a prospective randomised, open label, comparative, multicentre, phase II trial designed to include 118 patients. The primary objective is to evaluate the superiority of FTD/TPI plus oxaliplatin with or without nivolumab over FOLFOX regimen with or without nivolumab in terms of PFS in a population of patients non candidate for triplet chemotherapy. Nivolumab will be used for patients whose tumour express PD-L1 with a CPS score ≥5. DiscussionPRODIGE73-UCGI40-LOGICAN study will provide efficacy and safety data on the association of FTD/TPI plus oxaliplatin with or without nivolumab versus FOLFOX regimen with or without nivolumab in first-line palliative setting, in patients with aGA/GEJA (NCT05476796).

Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Related Mania in Cancer Patients

Objective: This study aims to evaluate chemotherapy-related mania in cancer patients. Methods: The mania status of 153 cancer patients who received chemotherapy was compared by applying the Young Mania Rating Scale before starting chemotherapy and after one session of the chemotherapy regimen. Results: When the mania total scores before and after treatment were compared according to the chemotherapeutic agents, it was seen that the post-treatment mania total scores increased in those using Fluorouracil-Folinic Acid-Oxaliplatin (Folfox) (p=0.014) and paclitaxel (p=0.036) chemotherapy regimens. In 8 (5.2%) patients who received the Folfox regimen, the mild mania score exceeded 20 points. Conclusions: Although the blood-brain barrier protects the central nervous system from the toxicity of many drugs, it is known that the stress of cancer diagnosis and some chemotherapeutics used in treatment cause disorders such as acute confusion, depression, and mania. In our study, as in case-based publications in the literature, a statistically significant increase in the total mania score was found in the Folfox regimen due to 5-fluorouracil's ability to cross the blood-brain barrier easily. According to published case reports in the literature, the possibility of mania symptoms appearing in the second, third, and sometimes subsequent sessions should be taken into consideration due to cumulative or delayed side effects of the drugs

Analysis of the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable hepatitis B-related intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC) for unresectable hepatitis B-related intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(ICC). Methods: This is a retrospective controlled study. Data from 140 unresectable ICC patients who received HAIC treatment at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from March 2015 to June 2023 were retrospectively collected, including 72 patients in the hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg)negative group (43 males and 29 females, aged (59.6±9.5)years(range: 34 to 81 years)), 68 cases in the HBsAg-positive group (48 males, 20 females, aged (53.4±11.4)years(range: 29 to 82 years)). HAIC treatment used the FOLFOX regimen combined with oxaliplatin, leucovorin,and fluorouracil. The differences in effects, prognosis,and adverse reactions between the two groups of patients after HAIC treatment were analyzed. All variables were expressed as categorical data. The χ2 test or Fisher's exact probability method was used to compare between groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw survival curves. The difference of survival curve between groups were compared through the Log-rank test. Results: According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST) version 1.1,the objective response rate(ORR) of the HBsAg-negative group was 23.2%(16/69),and the ORR of the HBsAg-positive group was 40.3%(25/62). The difference in ORR between the two groups was statistically significant(χ2=4.459,P=0.035). According to the modified RECIST(mRECIST) criteria,the ORR of the HBsAg-negative group was 27.5%(19/69), and the ORR of the HBsAg-positive group was 45.2%(28/62). The difference in ORR between the two groups was statistically significant(χ2=4.410,P=0.036). The median progression-free survival(PFS) of the HBsAg-negative group and the positive group were 7.1 months(95%CI: 5.8 to 13.2 months) and 7.3 months (95%CI: 5.7 to 10.3 months), respectively, and the median overall survival(OS) were 16.3 months (95%CI: 12.5 to 33.9 months) and 15.9 months (95%CI: 9.2 to 20.7 months) respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in PFS and OS between the two groups (both P>0.05). The main serious adverse reactions of the two groups of patients included increased AST, increased ALT, thrombocytopenia,and neutropenia. There were no statistically significant differences in various adverse reactions between the two groups after HAIC treatment (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Patients with HBsAg-positive unresectable ICC are more likely to benefit from HAIC treatment.

Pseudomyxoma Peritonei: A Challenging Clinical Diagnosis. Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a clinical entity of subtle onset abdominal pain, ascites, and distention associated with characteristic imaging. In most cases, laparoscopic exploration will give the definitive diagnosis and histopathologic verification. However, usually there are difficulties in the diagnosis of this disease. Herein, we present a case of a 51-year-old female who developed ascites over 5 months. An investigational laparotomy established the diagnosis of PMP, after the discovery of a mucinous, grey-brown tumor that was CK20 positive and CK7 negative. Subsequently, chemotherapy with oxaliplatin combined with 5-FU (FOLFOX4 regimen), was initiated and the patient survived for 30 months. We also present a comprehensive review of the English literature concerning the different symptoms and radiological findings of this rare entity. According to the literature review, 35 cases of PMP with different clinical and radiological findings have been described. In the majority of the cases, ultrasound, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was orientating towards a proper diagnosis before a diagnostic laparotomy. The combination of a clinical picture with the characteristic imaging findings enables a prompt diagnosis of PMP, making prognosis more favorable.

Lipid core-shell nanoparticles co-deliver FOLFOX regimen and siPD-L1 for synergistic targeted cancer treatment

FOLFOX regimen, composed of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin (OXP), has been used as clinical standard therapeutic regimen in treatments of colorectal cancer (CRC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). To further improve its therapeutic outcomes, FOLFOX was combined with anti-PD-1 antibody to form an advanced chemo-immune combination strategy, which has been proven more efficient in controlling cancer progression and prolonging patients' survival in various clinical trials. However, bad tumor accumulation, relative high toxicity, numerous treatment cycles with high fees and low compliance as well as drug resistance seriously limit the prognosis of FOLFOX regimen. The “all-in-one” formulations, which could precisely delivery multidrug regimen into tumor sites and cells, showed a promising application prospect for targeted drug delivery as well as reducing side effects. However, the design and preparation of the “all-in-one” formulation with high drug encapsulation efficiencies for all drugs was still challenging. Herein, a lipid core-shell nanoparticle codelivery platform was designed for simultaneous encapsulation of variant FOLFOX composed of miriplatin (MiPt), 5-Fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine 5′-monophosphate (FdUMP), calcium folinate (CF) and PD-L1 siRNA (siPD-L1) with high efficiencies, and their synergistic anti-tumor mechanisms were studied, respectively. MiPt, a precursor of OXP, was validated capable of inducing efficient immunogenic cell death (ICD) in this work. Additionally, ICD-mediated release of damage associated molecular patterns functionalized synergistically with PD-L1 silence by siPD-L1 to overcome chemoresistance, reverse suppressive tumor microenvironment and recruit more CD8+ T cells. FdUMP, as the intracellular active form of 5-FU, could induce large amounts of reactive oxygen species to enhance the ICD. CF worked as the sensitizer of FdUMP. The enhanced long-term anti-tumor effect of the prepared “all-in-one” formulation compared to free drug regimen and other controls, was verified in heterotopic CRC mice models and ESCC mice models, providing new thoughts for researchers and showing a promising prospect of translation into clinical applications.

Optimal duration of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with different risk factors for stage II-III colon cancer: a meta-analysis.

The duration of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in high-risk stage II, low-risk stage III, and high-risk stage III colon cancer (CC) patients is controversial. To reduce the risk of adverse events (AEs) without compromising efficacy while improving chemotherapy compliance is crucial. The authors searched Cochrane, Embase, Pubmed, and Web of Science databases for articles from inception to August 8, 2023, the main outcomes were disease-free survival, overall survival, chemotherapy completion rates, and AE frequency. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 10332 patients were included. Disease-free survival analysis revealed that only the high-risk stage III CC patients experienced better results with the 6-month FOLFOX regimen when compared with the 3-month regimen [Hazard ratio (HR): 1.32, 95% CI: 1.15-1.51, P <0.0001). Overall survival (OS) analysis revealed that extending the use of FOLFOX and CAPEOX regimens did not provide survival benefits for stage III CC patients (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.9-1.49, and HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.67-1.18, P =0.40). The completion rate of the 3-month oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimen was significantly higher than that of the 6-month regimen [Relative risk (RR): 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06-1.27, P =0.002]. Moreover, the 3-month regimen had significantly lower AE rates than the 6-month regimen (RR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.57-0.68, P <0.00001), with differences mainly concentrated in grade 3/4 neutropenia (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59-0.85, P =0.0002), peripheral sensory neuropathy at ≥grade 2 (RR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.38-0.53, P <0.00001), and hand-foot syndrome at ≥grade 2 (RR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.17-0.77, P =0.009). The 6-month FOLFOX regimen should only be recommended for high-risk stage III CC, while the 3-month regimen can be recommended for other stages. A 3-month CAPEOX regimen can be recommended for stage II-III CC.

Economic evaluation of personalized vs. standard dosing of 5-fluorouracil in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia.

Using pharmacokinetics (PK)-guided 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) improves overall survival (OS) and decreases toxicity, yet its value for money in the Australian setting is unknown. Our study assesses the cost-effectiveness of PK vs. body surface area (BSA) dosing of 5-FU for patients with mCRC. We developed a semi-Markov model with four health states to compare PK-guided dosing within a FOLFOX regimen vs. BSA-guided dosing for mCRC patients from an Australian healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were derived from fitted survival models, with utility values obtained directly from published studies. We calculated direct healthcare costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and included both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. BSA-guided FOLFOX provided 1.291 QALYs at a cost of $36 379, compared with PK-guided FOLFOX which delivered 1.751 QALYs at a cost of $32 564. Therefore, PK-guided dosing emerges as the dominant strategy offering both better health outcomes and lower costs. The variables that had the greatest impact on the overall ICER were the adverse event rates in the BSA and PK groups, model time horizon, utility of progression-free survival and PREDICT assay cost. Our univariate and multivariate sensitivity analysis confirmed that the ICER for PK FOLFOX consistently remained below $50 000 per QALY across all tested variables. PK dose management of 5-FU-based chemotherapy in mCRC patients appears to be a cost-saving strategy in Australia. However, our model estimates are drawn from limited, low-quality evidence. Further evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), directly comparing PK-based to BSA-based dosing across a variety of current regimens, is needed to address our model's uncertainties.

Anlotinib combined with penpulimab and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in the first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

TPS579 Background: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is recommended as a treatment option in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Anlotinib plus penpulimab, a humanized anti-PD-1 IgG1 antibody, has shown encouraging activity in the treatment of advanced HCC in an open-label phase II trial (NCT 04172571). Considering different anti-malignancy mechanisms, combining systemic and locoregional therapies may show a potential synergic effect and promising preliminary efficacy results in advanced HCC. Consequently, the aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Anlotinib, Penpulimab, plus HAIC for advanced HCC. Methods: Trial design: This single-arm, prospective, phase II study will include treatment-naive adult (≥18 years) patients with advanced HCC, ECOG PS 0-2, and Child-Pugh class A-B. A total number of 26 patients will be enrolled for treatment until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Patients will receive anlotinib(10 mg, p.o., qd, d1-14, q3w), penpulimab (200 mg, i.v., d1, q3w) and HAIC (d1- d2) with the FOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin 85-130 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil infusion 2400 mg/m2 for 48 hours) for 4-6 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with anlotinib and penpulimab for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR)), evaluated using RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints are median PFS and overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) per RECIST 1.1, quality of life (QOL) and safety. Recruitment for this study will complete in December 2024.

Phase Ib adaptive study of dasatinib for the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab.

745 Background: Neurotoxicity is one of the most significant and disabling side effects of oxaliplatin (OX) and frequently limits the amount of OX that can be used. OX uptake by organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) into mouse and rat dorsal root ganglia is a prerequisite for OX-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN). Preclinical data in rat and mouse models from our group showed that by inhibiting YES1, pre-treatment with dasatinib (D) inactivated OCT2 and prevented acute and chronic OIPN. A phase I trial is ongoing investigating addition of D prior to OX to prevent OIPN. Methods: This was a Bayesian Phase 1b dose-finding study with adaptive dose selection using efficacy-toxicity trade-offs in patients (pts) with GI cancers who are candidates for mFOLFOX6 ± bevacizumab [NCT04164069]. Pts received chemotherapy on day 1 and 15 schedule, every 28 days. D was administered at one of 2 dose levels – 100mg or 140mg PO, given 24 hours and 30 mins prior to OX on C1D14, C1D15 respectively and repeated on C1D28 and C2D1. During cycle 1, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data was obtained at baseline, during, and up to 24 hours after D or OX administration. Recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) was defined as the lowest intermittent dose of D that affects serum biomarkers of OCT2, including methylnicotinamide (NMN) and creatinine, by ≥2-fold without influencing the clearance of oxaliplatin by ≥20%. CIPN20 questionnaire was completed prior to each dose of FOLFOX on screening through to C3D1. Weakly informative Jeffreys priors were used for response and toxicity probabilities, with the latter constrained to be increasing with dose. Results: 13 pts were screened. 5 pts enrolled in cohort 1 (D 100 mg), 2 in cohort 2 (D 140 mg) and 2 in cohort 3 (D 140mg). 6 pts were not evaluable for the efficacy and toxicity endpoints due to screen failure or early study discontinuation. 7 patients were evaluated for efficacy biomarkers and 6 pts were evaluated for both efficacy biomarkers and toxicity. There were no DLTs observed in any cohort. 4/7 pts had ≥2-fold increase in AUC of NMN, and 3/7 pts had ≥2-fold increase in AUC of creatinine. 6/7 pts had ≤20% change in the clearance of OX. Conclusions: Addition of D 100mg or 140mg to traditional FOLFOX regimen was safe and in the majority of pts appeared to alter serum biomarkers of OCT2 in a manner suggesting inhibition of OX uptake in the DRG. 140mg was the chosen RP2D. A randomized phase II study is planned using D to prevent OPIN. Clinical trial information: NCT04164069 . [Table: see text]

Chinese Medicine Combined with Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Improving Myelosuppression in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

To assess the effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) combined with adjuvant chemotherapy on myelosuppression for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients using network meta-analysis (NMA). Literature searches in both international (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) and Chinese (China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure) databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted from inception until October 10, 2022. We included RCTs of patients who received CHM combined with chemotherapy, including FOLFOX, XELOX, FOLFIRI, and other relevant regimens in the CHM treatment group. The outcomes included the incidence of myelosuppression, leukopenia, hemoglobin reduction, and thrombocytopenia. Two reviewers independently screened the databases, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias and credibility of evidence. RevMan 5.4.1 software and STATA 14.0 were used to perform the NMA. A total of 31 RCTs were included, published from 2008 to 2021 in Chinese. Among these, 2,314 participants comparing the following 9 CHMs were identified: Shengbai Recipe (SBR), Bazhen Decoction (BZD), Jianpi Jiedu Recipe (JJR), Jianpi Recipe (JR), Compound Cantharis Capsule (CCC), Zaofan Pill (ZFP), Guilu Erxian Gel (GL), Buzhong Tiaogan Decoction (BZ), and Qiamagu Capsule (QM). The results of NMA found an indirect comparison. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), the ZFP+ chemotherapy group had the lowest incidence of myelosuppression, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.08 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01, 0.76], whereas the GL+ chemotherapy group had the lowest incidence of leukopenia, hemoglobin reduction, and thrombocytopenia, with an OR of 5.25 (95% CI: 2.41, 11.43), 4.66 (95% CI: 2.23, 9.72), and 0.27 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.54), respectively. Moreover, BZD + chemotherapy could alleviate leukopenia, hemoglobin reduction, and thrombocytopenia (P<0.01). Pairwise comparison showed that there was no difference in the efficacy among the 8 CHMs+ chemotherapy group. The comparison and adjustment funnel plot indicated that small-study effect had no impact on these outcomes. This NMA provided evidence to support that patients with CRC benefit from receiving different combination of CHM chemotherapies. Among these, GL plus chemotherapy and BZD plus chemotherapy were the more effective for myelosuppression in patients; however, as the qualtiy of evidence is insufficient, further research is needed. (PROSPERO, No. CRD42022369025).