Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Research Articles

Artificial intelligence-assisted focused cardiac ultrasound training: A survey among undergraduate medical students

Objectives: Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) is increasingly applied in many specialities, and adequate education and training of physicians is therefore mandatory. This study aimed to assess the impact of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted interactive focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) teaching session on undergraduate medical students’ confidence level and knowledge in cardiac ultrasound. Methods: The AI-assisted interactive FoCUS teaching session was held during the 9th National Undergraduate Cardiovascular Conference in London in March 2023 and all undergraduate medical students were invited to attend, and 79 students enrolled and attended the training. Two workshops were conducted each over 3-hour period. Each workshop consisted of a theoretical lecture followed by a supervised hands-on session by experts, first workshop trained 39 students and the second workshop trained 40 students. The students’ pre- and post-session knowledge and confidence levels were assessed by Likert-type-scale questionnaires filled in by the students before and immediately after the workshop. Results: A total of 61 pre-session and 52 post-session questionnaires were completed. Confidence level in ultrasound skills increased significantly for all six domains after the workshop, with the greatest improvement seen in obtaining basic cardiac views (p < 0.001 for all six domains). Students strongly agreed about the effectiveness of the teaching session and supported the integration of ultrasound training into their medical curriculum. Conclusions: AI-assisted interactive FoCUS training can be an effective and powerful tool to increase ultrasound skills and confidence levels of undergraduate medical students. Integration of such ultrasound courses into the medical curriculum should therefore be considered.

468 Current Stance on Focused Cardiac Ultrasound (FOCUS) for Suspected Aortic Dissection by Physicians in Mid-Atlantic Emergency Departments

468 Current Stance on Focused Cardiac Ultrasound (FOCUS) for Suspected Aortic Dissection by Physicians in Mid-Atlantic Emergency Departments

Evaluation of Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities with Echocardiography in the Emergency Department

Abstract Introduction Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major cardiovascular disease, particularly in cases where standard electrocardiogram findings are equivocal. Focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) has become increasingly accepted as a tool in emergency medicine. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of FOCUS in detecting regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) compared with standard echocardiography (ECHO). Materials and Methods This prospective observational study included 91 patients who presented to the emergency department between June 1, 2023, and November 30, 2023. Senior emergency physicians performed FOCUS examinations, which were performed by an emergency assistant or specialist who works in the emergency department, has at least 2 years of experience in ultrasonography (USG), and has basic USG and advanced USG certificates. The examinations assessed the presence of RWMA in each patient's left ventricle. Results All 91 patients were included in the study for comparison with formal ECHO. The mean age was 58, and 32% of patients were female. Compared with the criterion standard of formal ECHO, the sensitivity of FOCUS performed by emergency physicians for detecting RWMA was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73–92), the specificity was 53% (95% CI, 36–69), and the overall accuracy was 74% (95% CI, 64–82). Conclusion Our study demonstrates the potential utility of FOCUS performed by emergency physicians in detecting RWMA in patients with high suspicion of ACS.

Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care cardiac ultrasound for acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department: a single-center prospective study.

The diagnostic accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) performed in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain is currently unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of regional wall motion abnormalities detected with FoCUS for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) diagnosis. A Single-center prospective observational study conducted in 2022 in the ED of the University Hospital Careggi, Italy. Adult patients presenting to the ED with acute nontraumatic chest pain were enrolled, irrespective of the presence of previous regional wall motion abnormalities. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions and patients with hemodynamic instability were excluded. FoCUS was performed at presentation by a trained ED physician. The final diagnosis of NSTE-ACS vs. alternative diagnosis was adjudicated by an ED physician blinded to FoCUS results after a 30-day follow-up. To assess if regional wall motion abnormalities were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS, a multivariable logistic regression model was built. Diagnostic performance measures were calculated. A sensitivity analysis considering only type-1 NSTEMIs (i.e. plaque rupture/thrombosis) was conducted. Among 686 patients, NSTE-ACS was adjudicated in 106 (15.5%) patients, 67 of which were NSTEMIs. A total of 87 (12.7%) patients had regional wall motion abnormalities detected by FoCUS, which were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Regional wall motion abnormalities had a sensitivity of 42.5% (33.0-51.9), a specificity of 92.8% (90.6-94.9), a negative predictive value of 89.8% (87.4-92.2), and a positive predictive value of 51.7% (41.2-62.2), for NSTE-ACS. Results were consistent in the sensitivity analysis. In ED patients with chest pain and no ST elevation, the detection of regional wall motion abnormalities was a predictor of NSTE-ACS. Despite a high specificity, which indicated a possible role of FoCUS in the rule-in of NSTE-ACS, sensitivity was too low to allow a safe rule-out using FoCUS results alone.

Correlations and discrepancies between cardiac ultrasound, clinical diagnosis and the autopsy findings in early deceased patients with suspected cardiovascular emergencies.

Cardiac ultrasound (CUS), either focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) or emergency echocardiography, is frequently used in cardiovascular (CV) emergencies. We assessed correlations and discrepancies between CUS, clinical diagnosis and the autopsy findings in early deceased patients with suspected CV emergencies. We retrospectively analysed clinical and autopsy data of 131 consecutive patients who died within 24h of hospital admission. The type of CUS and its findings were analysed in relation to the clinical and autopsy diagnoses. CUS was performed in 58% of patients - FoCUS in 83%, emergency echocardiography in 12%, and both types of CUS in 5% of cases. CUS was performed more frequently in patients without a history of CV disease (64 vs. 40%, p = 0.08) and when the time between admission and death was longer (6 vs. 2h, p = 0.021). In 7% of patients, CUS was inconclusive. In 10% of patients, the ante-mortem cause of death could not be determined, while discrepancies between the clinical and post-mortem diagnosis were found in 26% of cases. In the multivariate logistic regression model, only conclusive CUS [odds ratio (OR) 2.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30-7.39, p = 0.044] and chest pain at presentation (OR 30.19, 95%CI 5.65 -161.22, p < 0.001) were independently associated with congruent clinical and autopsy diagnosis. In a tertiary university hospital, FoCUS was used more frequently than emergency echocardiography in critically ill patients with suspected cardiac emergencies. Chest pain at presentation and a conclusive CUS were associated with concordant clinical and autopsy diagnoses.

Blood or Fat? Differentiating Hemopericardium versus Epicardial Fat Using Focused Cardiac Ultrasound.

Basic point-of-care ultrasound of the heart-also known as Focused Cardiac Ultrasound (FoCUS)-has emerged as a powerful bedside tool to narrow the differential diagnosis of causes of hypotension. The list of causes of hypotension that a FoCUS provider is expected to be able to recognize includes a compressive pericardial effusion due to hemopericardium (blood in the pericardial sac). But hemopericardium can be difficult to distinguish from a more common condition that is not immediately life-threatening: epicardial fat. This paper reviews illustrative images of both epicardial fat and hemopericardium to provide practice guidance to the FoCUS user on how to differentiate these two phenomena.

Utility of focused cardiac ultrasonography training in veterinary students to differentiate stages of subclinical myxomatous mitral valve disease in dogs.

Differentiation of the subclinical phases of myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) in dogs relies heavily on echocardiography. Focused cardiac ultrasonography (FCU) is a point-of-care technique that can assess heart size. Veterinary students trained in FCU can differentiate dogs with subclinical MMVD based on left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) dimensions. Forty-eight dogs with subclinical MMVD. Veterinary students were trained to measure LV dimension and LA-to-aortic root dimension ratio (LA : Ao) using FCU. Dogs were categorized into 2 cohorts based on whether or not the LV normalized internal diastolic dimension was ≥1.7 and LA : Ao was ≥1.6. Agreement between FCU and echocardiographic studies performed by cardiologists was evaluated. One-hundred and forty-six FCU examinations were performed by 58 veterinary students on 48 dogs. Overall agreement between students and cardiologists was moderate (Fleiss' kappa, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.69; P < .001). Percentage accuracy in observations with heart dimensions less than the cutoffs (86/89, 97%) was significantly higher than in observations in with larger hearts (31/57, 54%; P < .001). Agreement increased from moderate to good as heart sizes became more extreme. Degree of confidence by students in performing FCU was significantly higher at the end vs start of the study. Categorization of dogs with subclinical MMVD by veterinary students using FCU was associated with moderate to good agreement with echocardiography. Focused cardiac ultrasonography is a point-of-care method that can help assess clinical stage in dogs with subclinical MMVD.

Automatic multi-view pose estimation in focused cardiac ultrasound

Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) is a valuable point-of-care method for evaluating cardiovascular structures and function, but its scope is limited by equipment and operator’s experience, resulting in primarily qualitative 2D exams. This study presents a novel framework to automatically estimate the 3D spatial relationship between standard FoCUS views. The proposed framework uses a multi-view U-Net-like fully convolutional neural network to regress line-based heatmaps representing the most likely areas of intersection between input images. The lines that best fit the regressed heatmaps are then extracted, and a system of nonlinear equations based on the intersection between view triplets is created and solved to determine the relative 3D pose between all input images. The feasibility and accuracy of the proposed pipeline were validated using a novel realistic in silico FoCUS dataset, demonstrating promising results. Interestingly, as shown in preliminary experiments, the estimation of the 2D images’ relative poses enables the application of 3D image analysis methods and paves the way for 3D quantitative assessments in FoCUS examinations.

Focused cardiac ultrasound: Competency among pre-internship medical officers in diagnosing cardiac causes of dyspnea.

Differentiating cardiovascular causes of dyspnea in resource-limited healthcare settings can be challenging. The use of easy-to-train, point-of-care, focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) protocols may potentially alleviate this challenge. Can novices attain competency in FoCUS use after training using the cardiac ultrasound for resource-limited settings (CURLS) protocol? A quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Kenyatta National Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya. Forty-five graduate medical pre-interns, novices in cardiac ultrasound, received simulated didactic and hands-on FoCUS skills training using the CURLS protocol and 2018 European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) FoCUS training and competence assessment recommendations. Competency was assessed in image interpretation, image acquisition, and image quality. Aggregate image interpretation competency was attained by n = 38 (84%) of trainees with a median score of 80%. The proportion of trainees attaining category-specific image interpretation competency was as follows: pericardial effusion n = 44 (98%), left atrial enlargement n = 40 (89%), cardiomyopathy n = 38 (84%), left ventricular hypertrophy n = 37 (82%), and right ventricular enlargement n = 29 (64%). Image acquisition skills competency was attained by n = 36 (80%) of trainees. Three-quarters of trainee-obtained images were of good quality. Majority of the trainees attained competency. Training constraints limit the generalizability of our findings.

Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Findings of Fluid Tolerance and Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock.

Compliance with the fluid bonus component of the SEP-1 (severe sepsis and septic shock management) bundle remains poor due to concerns for iatrogenic harm from fluid overload. We sought to assess whether patients who received focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) and were found to be fluid tolerant (FT) were more likely to receive the recommended 30 mL/kg fluid bolus within 3 hours of sepsis identification. Retrospective, observational cohort study. University-affiliated, tertiary-care hospital in the United States. Emergency department patients presenting with septic shock from 2018 to 2021. The primary exposure was receipt of FCU with identification of fluid tolerance 3 hours from onset of septic shock. None. Two hundred ninety-two of 1,024 patients with septic shock received FCU within 3 hours of sepsis onset. One hundred seventy-seven were determined to be FT. One hundred fifteen patients were determined to have poor fluid tolerance (pFT). FT patients were more likely to reach the recommended 30 mL/kg fluid bolus amount compared with pFT (FT 52.0% vs. pFT 31.3%, risk difference: 20.7%, [95% CI, 9.4-31.9]). Patients who did not receive FCU met the bolus requirement 34.3% of the time. FT patients received more fluid within 3 hours (FT 2,271 mL vs. pFT 1,646 mL, mean difference 625 mL [95% CI, 330-919]). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between fluid tolerance FCU findings and compliance with 30 mL/kg bolus after adjustment for patient characteristics and markers of hemodynamic instability. FT with associated with a higher likelihood of meeting bolus requirement (odds ratio 2.17 [1.52-3.12]). Patients found to be FT by FCU were more likely to receive the recommended 30 mL/kg bolus in the SEP-1 bundle when compared with patients found with pFT or those that did not receive FCU. There was no difference between groups in 28-day mortality, vasopressor requirement, or need for mechanical ventilation.

Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound with artificial intelligence-assisted assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction

Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) is becoming standard practice in a wide spectrum of clinical settings. There is limited data evaluating the real-world use of FoCUS with artificial intelligence (AI). Our objective was to determine the accuracy of FoCUS AI-assisted left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment and compare its accuracy between novice and experienced users. In this prospective, multicentre study, participants requiring a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) were recruited to have a FoCUS done by a novice or experienced user. The AI-assisted device calculated LVEF at the bedside, which was subsequently compared to TTE. 449 participants were enrolled with 424 studies included in the final analysis. The overall intraclass coefficient was 0.904, and 0.921 in the novice (n = 208) and 0.845 in the experienced (n = 216) cohorts. There was a significant bias of 0.73% towards TTE (p = 0.005) with a level of agreement of 11.2%. Categorical grading of LVEF severity had excellent agreement to TTE (weighted kappa = 0.83). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.98 for identifying an abnormal LVEF (<50%) with a sensitivity of 92.8%, specificity of 92.3%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.97 and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.83. In identifying severe dysfunction (<30%) the AUC was 0.99 with a sensitivity of 78.1%, specificity of 98.0%, NPV of 0.98 and PPV of 0.76. Here we report that FoCUS AI-assisted LVEF assessments provide highly reproducible LVEF estimations in comparison to formal TTE. This finding was consistent among senior and novice echocardiographers suggesting applicability in a variety of clinical settings.

Cost-effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasound in the pre-participation screening of athletes: the SPORT-FoCUS Study.

The role of Pre-participation screening (PPS) modalities in preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD) in athletes is debated due to a high false positive rate. Focused Cardiac Ultrasound (FoCUS) has shown higher sensitivity and specificity, but its cost-effectiveness remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of FoCUS use in PPS. 2111 athletes (77.4% male, mean age 24.9±15,2years) underwent standardized family and medical history collection (MH), physical examination (PEX), resting ECG, FoCUS (10min/5views-protocol), comprehensive Echocardiography and exercise stress test(EST). We prospectively evaluated three PPS incremental models: Model-A = standardized MH and physical examination; Model-B = Model-A plus resting and stress-ECG; Model-C = Model-B plus FoCUS (10min/5views-protocol). We determined their incremental diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness ratio. 30 athletes were diagnosed with a cardiac condition associated with SCD: 3 were identified by Model-A, 14 by Model-B, 13 athletes by Model-C. The introduction of FoCUS markedly increased the Sensitivity of PPS, compared with model-A and model-B (Sensitivity 94% vs. 19% vs. 58%, Specificity 93% vs. 93% vs. 92%). The total screening cost (TSC) were: Model-A 35.64Eur, Model-B 87.68Eur and Model-C 120.89Eur. Considering the sole conditions at risk of SCD, the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio was 135.62Eur for model-B and 114.31 for model-C. The implementation of FoCUS into the PPS allows to identify a significantly greater number of athletes at risk of SCD and markedly lowers the false negative rate. Furthermore, the incorporation of FoCUS into the screening process has shown to be cost-effective.

Intraoperative FoCUS: Training Practices and Views on Feasibility

To investigate whether resident anesthesiologists perceive intraoperative focused cardiac ultrasonography (FoCUS) as feasible, the self-reported confidence of residents performing intraoperative FoCUS, and United States graduate medical education resident ultrasound training practices. A cross-sectional survey. The United States Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-listed anesthesiology programs over a 3-month period between June 2022 to September 2022. United States anesthesiology residents. A survey. Reported training practices were as follows: 87.3% of respondents reported formal FoCUS training, and the most commonly reported training was "lectures+live-model training under 5 hours annually" at 31%. Most respondents (82%) stated that faculty never or rarely performed bedside FoCUS, and most respondents (69%) reported no intraoperative FoCUS education exposure. The proportion of residents who reported a positive view on the perceived feasibility of intraoperative FoCUS was 53.2% for extremity surgery, 19.8% for laparoscopic surgery, 18.6% for exploratory laparotomy surgery, and 7.9% for robotic surgery. Most respondents (78.6%) indicated a lack of confidence in performing intraoperative FoCUS independently. The authors found no statistical difference in views on feasibility or reported confidence independently performing FoCUS across training years. Training that included "lectures+simulation" or "live-model" for more than 5 hours annually, faculty routinely using bedside FoCUS, and frequent exposure to intraoperative FoCUS increased the odds of reporting confidence. The misconception that intraoperative FoCUS is infeasible appears prevalent, and most of the authors' respondents expressed a lack of comfort independently performing intraoperative FoCUS. Alterations of training practices, including increasing faculty usage of bedside ultrasonography, increasing trainee time performing FoCUS, and incorporating specific intraoperative ultrasound into the ultrasound curriculum, may address these deficiencies.

Decentralized Heart Failure Management in Neno, Malawi.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of death in Malawi. In rural districts, heart failure (HF) care is limited and provided by non-physicians. The causes and patient outcomes of HF in rural Africa are largely unknown. In our study, non-physician providers performed focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) for HF diagnosis and longitudinal clinical follow-up in Neno, Malawi. We described the clinical characteristics, HF categories, and outcomes of patients presenting with HF in chronic care clinics in Neno, Malawi. Between November 2018 and March 2021, non-physician providers performed FOCUS for diagnosis and longitudinal follow-up in an outpatient chronic disease clinic in rural Malawi. A retrospective chart review was performed for HF diagnostic categories, change in clinical status between enrollment and follow-up, and clinical outcomes. For study purposes, cardiologists reviewed all available ultrasound images. There were 178 patients with HF, a median age of 67 years (IQR 44 - 75), and 103 (58%) women. During the study period, patients were enrolled for a mean of 11.5 months (IQR 5.1-16.5), after which 139 (78%) were alive and in care. The most common diagnostic categories by cardiac ultrasound were hypertensive heart disease (36%), cardiomyopathy (26%), and rheumatic, valvular or congenital heart disease (12.3%).At follow-up, the proportion of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I patients increased from 24% to 50% (p < 0.001; 95% CI: 31.5 - 16.4), and symptoms of orthopnea, edema, fatigue, hypervolemia, and bibasilar crackles all decreased (p < 0.05). Hypertensive heart disease and cardiomyopathy are the predominant causes of HF in this elderly cohort in rural Malawi. Trained non-physician providers can successfully manage HF to improve symptoms and clinical outcomes in limited resource areas. Similar care models could improve healthcare access in other rural African settings.

FOCUS may detect wall motion abnormalities in patients with ACS

BackgroundChest pain is a common presentation to the Emergency Department (ED) with roughly 6 million visits a year. The primary diagnostic modality for the identification of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the electrocardiogram (ECG), which is used to screen for electrocardiographic findings representing acute coronary occlusion. It is known that the ischemia generated by an acutely occluded coronary vessel generates a wall motion abnormality which can be visualized by echocardiogram; however, emergency physician-performed focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) currently does not have a formal role in the diagnosis of OMI within the emergency department. PurposeWe sought to define the characteristics of FOCUS performed by emergency physicians of variable training levels in the identification of RWMA in patients presenting to the emergency department with high suspicion for ACS before undergoing cardiac catheterization or formal echocardiography. We also explored whether RWMA was associated with OMI in these patients. MethodsWe performed a structured, retrospective review of adult patients presenting to a large, academic, tertiary care center with suspected ACS from July 1st, 2019, and October 24th, 2020. Patients were included if they underwent FOCUS in the ED during the time-period above for suspected ACS looking for RWMA and FOCUS images were stored and reviewable in our middleware software. The primary outcome was the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of FOCUS compared to formal echocardiography for the detection of RWMA. Secondary outcomes were sensitivity of FOCUS compared to formal echocardiography for detection of RWMA in patients with and without cardiac catheterization proven OMI and sensitivity and specificity of FOCUS operators based on training. ResultsFOCUS for RWMA performed by emergency physicians had a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI, 82–98), specificity 35% (95% CI, 15–61), and overall accuracy of 78% (95% CI, 66–87). Of all subjects, 82% underwent urgent or emergency coronary angiography, of which 71% had OMI at the time of coronary angiography of the procedure. FOCUS identified RWMA in 87% of patients with coronary angiography proven OMI. Residents (PGY-1 - PGY-3) (n = 31) were able to detect RWMA with a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI, 64–96), a specificity of 56% (95% CI, 23–85%), and an accuracy of 77 (95% CI, 58–90%). Emergency ultrasound fellows and attendings (n = 34) were able to detect RWMA with a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI, 64–95%), a specificity of 75% (95% CI, 36–96%), and an accuracy of 82% (95% CI, 65–93%). ConclusionsOur retrospective study concludes FOCUS performed by emergency physicians may be used to detect RWMA in patients with high concern for acute coronary syndrome. This may have its greatest utility in patients presenting without STEMI where the ECG is felt to be equivocal, but the clinician has high concern for OMI, in which the presence of RWMA might result in emergent cath lab activation, though this requires further study. The presence of RWMA in such cases may help to rule in OMI as a cause; however, the absence of RWMA should exclude OMI. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings.

Focused cardiac ultrasound with mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) detection of left ventricular dysfunction

ObjectivesDetecting reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by an emergency physician (EP) is an important skill. The subjective ultrasound assessment of LVEF by EPs correlates with comprehensive echocardiogram (CE) results. Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) is an ultrasound measure of vertical movement of the mitral annulus, which correlates to LVEF in the cardiology literature, but has not been studied when measured by an EP. Our objective is to determine whether EP measured MAPSE can accurately predict LVEF <50% on CE. MethodsThis is a prospective observational single center study using a convenience sample to evaluate the use of a focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) for patients with possible decompensated heart failure. The FOCUS included standard cardiac views to estimate LVEF, MAPSE, and E-point septal separation (EPSS). Abnormal MAPSE was defined as <8 mm and abnormal EPSS as >10 mm. The primary outcome assessed was the ability of an abnormal MAPSE to predict an LVEF <50% on CE. MAPSE also was compared to EP estimated LVEF and EPSS. Inter-rater reliability was determined by two investigators performing independent blinded review. ResultsWe enrolled 61 subjects, 24 (39%) had an LVEF <50% on a CE. MAPSE <8 mm had a 42% sensitivity (95% CI 22–63), 89% specificity (95% CI 75–97), and accuracy of 71% for detecting LVEF <50%. MAPSE demonstrated lower sensitivity than EPSS (79% sensitivity [95% CI 58–93], and 76% specificity [95% CI 59–88]) and higher specificity than estimated LVEF (100% sensitivity [95% CI 86–100], 59% specificity [95% CI 42–75]). PPV and NPV for MAPSE was 71% (95% CI 47–88) and 70% (95% CI 62–77) respectively. The ROC for MAPSE <8 mm is 0.79 (95% CI 0.68–0.9). MAPSE measurement interrater reliability was 96%. ConclusionsIn this exploratory study evaluating MAPSE measurements by EPs, we found the measurement was easy to perform with excellent agreement across users with minimal training. A MAPSE value <8 mm had moderate predictive value for LVEF <50% on CE and was more specific for reduced LVEF than qualitative assessment. MAPSE had high specificity for LVEF <50%. Further studies are needed to validate these results on a larger scale.

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization

Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) is a limited, clinician-performed application of echocardiography to add real-time information to patient care. These bedside exams are problem oriented, rapidly and repeatedly performed, and largely qualitative in nature. Competency in FoCUS includes mastery of the stereotactic and psychomotor skills required for transducer manipulation and image acquisition. Competency also requires the ability to optimize the setup, troubleshoot image acquisition, and understand the sonographic limitations because of complex clinical environments and patient pathology. This article presents concepts for successful, high-quality two-dimensional (B-mode) image acquisition in FoCUS. Concepts of high-quality image acquisition can be applied to all established sonographic windows of the FoCUS exam: the parasternal long-axis (PLAX), parasternal short-axis (PSAX), apical four chamber (A4C), subcostal fourchamber (SC4C), and the inferior vena cava (IVC). The apical five-chamber (A5C) and subcostal short-axis (SCSA) views are mentioned, but are not discussed in-depth. A pragmatic figure illustrating the movements of the phased array transducer is also provided to serve as a cognitive aid during FoCUS image acquisition.

Medicina de precisión: «Point of Care Ultrasound» (PoCUS) en el abordaje diagnóstico del paciente con hiponatremia

Hyponatremia is a multifactorial disorder defined as a decrease in plasma sodium concentration. Its differential diagnosis requires an adequate evaluation of the extracellular volume. However, extracellular volume determination, simply based on the clinical history, vital signs, physical examination, and laboratory findings can leads to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. The use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (PoCUS), through the combination of Lung Ultrasound (LUS), Venous Excess UltraSound (VExUS) and Focused Cardiac Ultrasound (FoCUS), allows a much more accurate holistic assessment of the patient's extracellular volume status in combination with the other parameters.

The Effectiveness of a Patient’s Bedside Ultrasonography in Diagnosing a Pulmonary Embolism, in the Emergency Department

Objective: The research aim was to analyze the function of focused cardiac ultrasonography (FoCUS) in diagnosing a pulmonary embolism (PE) and contributing to the practice of emergency medicine and expediting the treatment of PE. Materials and Methods: In this prospective and observational study, Wells scores were calculated on those patients who presented to the emergency department over the last 2 years and were evaluated with a preliminary diagnosis of PE, as well as the biochemical values and imaging techniques. In all cases, FoCUS was used as the diagnostic tool. Results: A PE was detected in 38 (63.3%) of 60 patients. According to Wells score, it was determined that 5 (8.3%) patients had low-risk, 41 (68.3%) had medium-risk, and 14 (23.3%) had high-risk Wells score. There was a statistically significant correlation between the existence of PE and the findings of FoCUS in patients with right ventricular dilatation ( P &lt; .001). According to Wells score, moderate-risk individuals with PE were more likely to exhibit right ventricular dilatation ( P = .003). Conclusion: The FoCUS results either alone or in conjunction with the Wells score, reviewed in the diagnosis of PE, effectively indicated and directed the diagnosis and treatment of patients admitted to this particular emergency department.

FoCUS cardiac ultrasound training for undergraduates based on current national guidelines: a prospective, controlled, single-center study on transferability

IntroductionIn emergency and critical-care medicine, focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) is indispensable for assessing a patient’s cardiac status. The aim of this study was to establish and validate a peer-to-peer–supported ultrasound course for learning FoCUS-specific skills during undergraduate studies at a German university.MethodsA 1-day, 12 teaching units training course was developed for students in the clinical section of medical college, with content based on the current national guidelines. A total of 217 students participated in the study (97 in the course group and 120 in the control group). The course and the participants’ subjective assessment of improved skills were evaluated using a questionnaire (7-point Likert scale; 7 = complete agreement and 1 = no agreement at all). Objective learning gains were assessed by tests before and after the course. These consisted of a test of figural intelligence (eight items) and a test of technical knowledge (13 items).ResultsThe course participants experienced significant improvement (P < 0.001) from before to after the course, with a large effect size of η2part = 0.26. In addition, the course group had significantly better results (P < 0.001) than the control group in the post-test, with a medium to large effect size of η2part = 0.14. No significant differences (P = 0.27) were detected in the test section on figural intelligence. The evaluations showed that the participants had a high degree of satisfaction with the course approach, teaching materials, and tutors. There was also a positive increase in their subjective assessment of their own skills, including areas such as technical knowledge, ultrasound anatomy, and performance of the examination.ConclusionThe results of both the objective learning assessment and the subjective evaluations suggest that a FoCUS course originally intended for qualified physicians is equally suitable for students. With the development and provision of modern digital teaching media, even more students will be able to benefit from this approach in the future.