Focus Reduction Neutralization Research Articles

Antigenic Characterization of Circulating and Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Variants in the U.S. throughout the Delta to Omicron Waves.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has evolved into numerous lineages with unique spike mutations and caused multiple epidemics domestically and globally. Although COVID-19 vaccines are available, new variants with the capacity for immune evasion continue to emerge. To understand and characterize the evolution of circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants in the U.S., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) initiated the National SARS-CoV-2 Strain Surveillance (NS3) program and has received thousands of SARS-CoV-2 clinical specimens from across the nation as part of a genotype to phenotype characterization process. Focus reduction neutralization with various antisera was used to antigenically characterize 143 SARS-CoV-2 Delta, Mu and Omicron subvariants from selected clinical specimens received between May 2021 and February 2023, representing a total of 59 unique spike protein sequences. BA.4/5 subvariants BU.1, BQ.1.1, CR.1.1, CQ.2 and BA.4/5 + D420N + K444T; BA.2.75 subvariants BM.4.1.1, BA.2.75.2, CV.1; and recombinant Omicron variants XBF, XBB.1, XBB.1.5 showed the greatest escape from neutralizing antibodies when analyzed against post third-dose original monovalent vaccinee sera. Post fourth-dose bivalent vaccinee sera provided better protection against those subvariants, but substantial reductions in neutralization titers were still observed, especially among BA.4/5 subvariants with both an N-terminal domain (NTD) deletion and receptor binding domain (RBD) substitutions K444M + N460K and recombinant Omicron variants. This analysis demonstrated a framework for long-term systematic genotype to antigenic characterization of circulating and emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants in the U.S., which is critical to assessing their potential impact on the effectiveness of current vaccines and antigen recommendations for future updates.

Standardization, validation, and comparative evaluation of a faster and high-performance test for quantification of yellow fever neutralizing antibodies

Although it is considered the reference for quantification of neutralizing antibodies, classical method of the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) is labor intensive, requires specific equipment and inputs, besides a long time for its finalization, even in the micro-PRNT version (in 96-well plates). It has a higher sample throughput, however the smaller wells make the reading of plaques more difficult. With an immunoenzymatic revelation step and a semi-automated reading, the μFRN-HRP (micro Focus Reduction Neutralization - Horseradish Peroxidase) is a faster and more efficient test for the quantification of YF neutralizing antibodies. This study aimed to standardize, validate, and compare it with the reference method in 6-well plates (PRNT). Once the execution protocol was standardized, precision, accuracy, selectivity, and robustness were evaluated to validate the μFRN-HRP. In addition, 200 sera of vaccinees were processed by the μFRN-HRP and by the micro-PRNT to compare with the reference test, estimating agreement by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The standardization and validation of the μFRN-HRP was carried out successfully. Weak to moderate agreement was observed between μFRN-HRP and PRNT for titers in reciprocal dilution, while the same comparison between the classical tests resulted in a better ICC. However, titers in milli-international units obtained by μFRN-HRP showed a substantial agreement with PRNT, while the agreement between micro-PRNT and PRNT was inferior. Therefore, μFRN-HRP can be used in the confirmation of natural YF infection and immune response to vaccination, replacing the micro-PRNT, gaining agility, while preserving the specificity of the result.

Use of Single-Cycle Infectious Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus To Study Hemorrhagic Fever Arenaviruses

Several arenaviruses, chiefly Lassa virus (LASV) and Junin virus in West Africa and Argentina, respectively, cause hemorrhagic fever (HF) disease in humans that is associated with high morbidity and significant mortality. The investigation of antiviral strategies to combat HF arenaviruses is hampered by the requirement of biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) facilities to work with these viruses. These biosafety hurdles could be overcome by the use of recombinant single-cycle infectious arenaviruses. To explore this concept, we have developed a recombinant lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) (rLCMVΔGP/GFP) where we replaced the viral glycoprotein (GP) with the green fluorescent protein (GFP). We generated high titers of GP-pseudotyped rLCMVΔGP/GFP via genetic trans complementation using stable cell lines that constitutively express LCMV or LASV GPs. Replication of these GP-pseudotyped rLCMVΔGP/GFP viruses was restricted to GP-expressing cell lines. This system allowed us to rapidly and reliably characterize and quantify the neutralization activities of serum antibodies against LCMV and LASV within a BSL-2 facility. The sensitivity of the GFP-based microneutralization assay we developed was similar to that obtained with a conventionally used focus reduction neutralization (FRNT) assay. Using GP-pseudotyped rLCMVΔGP/GFP, we have also obtained evidence supporting the feasibility of this approach to identify and evaluate candidate antiviral drugs against HF arenaviruses without the need of BSL-4 laboratories.

Immunogenicity, antigenicity, and protection efficacy of baculovirus expressed VP4 trypsin cleavage products, VP5(1)* and VP8* from rhesus rotavirus.

Rhesus rotavirus (RRV) VP4 trypsin cleavage product VP5(1)*, a truncated form of VP5*, was expressed in baculovirus and found by immunoprecipitation to be antigenically similar to VP5* on the virion. Immunization of mice with VP5(1)* elicited neutralizing antibody that was found to be cross-reactive with viruses representing P genotypes 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8. Baculovirus expressed trypsin cleavage products, VP8* (amino acids 1-246) and VP5(1)* (amino acids 247-474), were tested for their ability to elicit a protective response in a murine model of passive protection. These results were compared to those obtained with baculovirus expressed RRV VP4. Dams immunized with baculovirus expressed RRV VP4 gave birth to pups protected from RRV virus challenge. Neither VP5(1)* nor VP8* was as effective at generating protective immunity as full length VP4. However, antibody to VP5(1)* was more effective than antibody to VP8* at mediating protection even though the neutralizing antibody titers as measured by hemagglutination inhibition and focus reduction neutralization were similar.

Development of an improved method for measuring neutralizing antibody to rotavirus

An improved assay was developed for measuring neutralizing antibody titers against rotaviruses. This procedure used the same initial steps as performed to determine antibody titers by the focus reduction neutralization (FRN) assay. However, instead of counting infected cells after staining with fluorescein, reductions in virus infectivity by neutralizing antibody were determined by quantitation of viral antigen production using an ELISA. A linear relationship was found between ELISA absorbance values and focus forming units for each of four prototype rotaviruses, representative of serotypes 1–4. Thus, the serum dilution that resulted in neutralization of 60% of infectious virus (i.e. the neutralizing antibody titer) could be readily determined from absorbance values. Titers found by this method were similar to and as reproducible as those found by the FRN assay. Because this method is less laborious and the results are obtained by objective rather than subjective methods, it represents an improvement over the FRN assay.