Focal Onset Seizures Research Articles

Cerebral cortical encephalitis in adults with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease: A national case series.

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is a relatively recently described disease, most commonly presenting with optic neuritis and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. Cerebral cortical encephalitis is a rare manifestation of MOGAD. We identified patients presenting with cerebral cortical encephalitis with positive MOG antibodies in serum across a large specialized service. Demographic and clinical information were collected. We describe clinical and laboratory characteristics, treatment response, and subsequent relapse risk in adults presenting with this phenotype. We identified eight patients meeting clinical criteria for cerebral cortical encephalitis with MOG antibodies. All had seizures; four had focal onset seizures with or without secondary generalization. Two patients exhibited encephalopathy, and six demonstrated focal neurological deficits at presentation. All had fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintensities. Five of eight displayed cerebral swelling, and two of eight displayed leptomeningeal enhancement. Where cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) results were available, five of seven had CSF pleocytosis, protein was raised in two of seven, and one patient had oligoclonal bands unique to CSF. Median time to seizure control was 1.25 months, and all clinical features and magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities resolved. Four of eight patients (50%) had a clinical relapse, with a median time to relapse of 6.4 months. Cerebral cortical encephalitis appears to share similar CSF findings, steroid responsiveness, and risk of relapse with other clinical manifestations of MOGAD. This informs treatment decisions and patient counselling.

A multicenter, cross-sectional analysis to assess the safety and usage pattern of brivaracetam in the management of partial-onset seizure with BAEs-BREEZE study: A post-hoc analysis.

Brivaracetam (BRV), a third-generation anti-seizure medication (ASM) offers strong conformational receptor domain binding, faster blood brain barrier (BBB) permeability and better tolerability making it potential therapeutic option as an initial line or initial line add-on strategy for focal onset seizure (FoS). The following study was planned to further understand the role and relevance of BRV in the real world settings of India. This was a multicentric, cross-sectional, and non-interventional study conducted in patients with FoS across India. The study was approved by central independent ethics committee. Descriptive and analytical statistics employed using SPSS version 29.0.1.0. Per protocol (PP) analysis included 8479 eligible patients from 1069 sites, gender; 5771 (68.06%) male and 2708 (31.94%) female with mean age 41.21 ± 12.74 years. Total 8019 (94.57%) patients had FoS and 460 (5.43%) patients had focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCs). In FoS, 4105 (51.19%) patients switched from LEV to BRV whereas 3914 (48.81%) switched from other ASMs to BRV. BAEs accounted for 2059 (50.16%) patients in LEV to BRV switch versus 133 (3.39%) in other ASM to BRV switch. Post switch, LEV-associated BAEs reduced irrespective of being used as monotherapy 85.65% (p < 0.001) or as an adjuvant therapy 83.71% (p < 0.001) at BRV dosage of 50 to 100 mg BID. This RWE showed the utility of BRV as mono component as an initial add-on strategy in FoS cases. BRV remains a pertinent therapeutic choice for FoS for the treatment naïve and/or BAE cases. Exposure of LEV leads to considerable BAEs compared to patients without LEV exposure. Patients who switched to BRV due to LEV-induced BAEs significantly improved tolerability with BRV irrespective being used as monotherapy or as adjuvant therapy. Current study was planned to understand the clinical role and relevance of third-generation anti-seizure medication (ASM), brivaracetam (BRV) in the real world settings of India. Outcome of the study highlighted that BRV is an emerging, potential and safe ASM treatment option for epilepsy in Indian context. Many patients with epilepsy who are not able to tolerate the other ASM including levetiracetam (LEV) primarily due to behavioral side effects improves tolerability post switch to BRV, additionally results are consistent either BRV being used as an adjuvant therapy or as monotherapy therapy.

Clinical characteristics of patients with P4HTM variant-associated epilepsy and therapeutic exploration: a case report and literature review.

The P4HTM gene encodes a transmembrane prolyl 4-hydroxylase, which is responsible for the degradation of hypoxia-inducible transcription factors (HIF) under normoxia. Clinically, biallelic P4HTM variants have been identified in patients with hypotonia, hypoventilation, intellectual disabilities, dysautonomia, epilepsy, and eye abnormalities (HIDEA syndrome). Seizure was one of the most prominent symptoms. However, the clinical features of patients with epilepsy associated with P4HTM variants remain unclear. In this report, we describe a one-month-old infant with HIDEA syndrome caused by compound heterozygous P4HTM variants (c.300dupG/p.Gly103Argfs*22 and c.488C > T/p.Ala163Val). The infant presented with clonic seizures of focal onset that responded well to valproate, but with profound intellectual disability and global developmental delay at the last follow-up at 3 years old. A review of the existing literature indicates that seizures in this population typically begin early in infancy, manifest in multiple types, and are relatively well controlled. Epilepsy seemed unrelated to developmental outcomes or disease progression. Valproate, which has HIF-1α inhibiting properties, may be a promising treatment avenue for this population.

Long-term efficacy and tolerability of brivaracetam in pediatric patients with focal-onset seizures and cognitive or learning comorbidities: Post hoc analysis of an open-label trial

ObjectiveEfficacy, tolerability, and behavioral/executive functioning during long-term adjunctive brivaracetam treatment were assessed in pediatric patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS) with/without cognitive/learning comorbidities (CLC). MethodsPost hoc analysis of a phase 3 open-label follow-up trial (N01266/NCT01364597). Patients with FOS (<16 years at core trial entry; direct enrollers ≥4–<17 years) received ≤5mg/kg/day brivaracetam (≤200mg/day). Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with and without ongoing CLC at baseline. ResultsPatients with CLC (84/185 [45.4%]) had longer epilepsy duration and higher number of prior antiseizure medications. Kaplan-Meier–estimated brivaracetam retention at 1, 3, and 5 years was 75.0%/78.2%, 61.9%/61.9%, and 52.2%/53.3% in patients with/without CLC. Efficacy assessments (patients >2 years of age) showed numerically lower median percent reduction in FOS frequency/28 days (43.8%/74.1% [n = 63/60]), 50% responder rates for FOS (46.0%/61.7% [n = 63/60]), and ≥12-month continuous freedom from all seizures (31.7%/55.9% [n = 60/68 patients with ≥12 months treatment]) in patients with/without CLC. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 94.0%/95.0% of patients with/without CLC (serious: 33.3%/27.7%; drug-related: 31.0%/33.7%). From baseline to last evaluation, most patients with/without CLC had no shift in T-score category for each Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) 1.5–5 syndrome (≥50.0%/≥72.2%), CBCL 6–18 syndrome (≥66.0%/≥69.1%), and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function scale (≥66.7%/≥69.0%). ConclusionsThese data indicate that brivaracetam could be an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option for pediatric patients with FOS with and without CLC. Behavior and executive functioning were generally stable or slightly improved in patients with and without CLC.

Epilepsia Partialis Continua as Late Sequelae in Chronic Cerebral Paragonimiasis

Paragonimiasis is a parasitic infection that occurs after ingesting freshwater crayfish or crabs, and Paragonimus westermani (P. westermani) species are the most important in clinical practice. Cerebral paragonimiasis is one of the most important extra-pulmonary forms with severe outcomes and higher mortality compared to the pulmonary forms. Epilepsia partialis continua (EPC) is defined as a variant of focal motor status epilepticus in which frequent repetitive muscle jerks, usually arrhythmic, continue over 1 hour. Cerebral infections of P. westermani often cause simple epileptic seizures, but cases progressing to EPC are very rare. The authors report a case of confirming and treating a newly developed recurrent focal onset seizures in a patient with chronic cerebral paragonimiasis treated over 30 years ago.

The Initial Experience of Eslicarbazepine in Children at Three Canadian Tertiary Pediatric Care Centers.

Eslicarbazepine (ESL) is a once-daily, third-generation antiseizure medication for focal-onset seizures. The primary mechanism of action is enhancing the slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. The study objective was to review real-world experience regarding retention rate, efficacy, and tolerability of eslicarbazepine, soon after it became available for children in Canada. A retrospective review was performed on all patients prescribed eslicarbazepine from September 2017 to June 2020, with at least 3 years of follow-up data, at 3 Canadian tertiary care pediatric centers. Fifty patients were identified, and the mean age of eslicarbazepine initiation was 12.4 years (range 3-19 years). Most patients had drug-resistant epilepsy, trying a mean of 5.04 (range 0-14) antiseizure medications before the initiation of eslicarbazepine. Twenty-four patients (48.0%) experienced adverse effects, including dizziness (n = 10), drowsiness (n = 6), dizziness and drowsiness (n = 1), nausea and abdominal pain (n = 4), transient unsteadiness and diplopia (n = 1), and negative mood changes (n = 2). None had serious adverse effects, including rash. The retention rate of eslicarbazepine at last follow-up was 70%. Fifteen (30%) had ≥50% seizure reduction, with 2 of these patients becoming seizure free. Ten (20%) had 25% to 50% reduction, 2 (4%) had worsening of seizures, and 17 (34%) had no change in seizure frequency. The study results support the long-term effectiveness and tolerability of eslicarbazepine in a cohort of children with predominantly drug-resistant epilepsy in a real-life setting from 3 Canadian centers with initial use after approval. Adverse effects were nonserious, infrequently leading to eslicarbazepine discontinuation.

Treatment with brivaracetam has no apparent long-term effects on body weight in pediatric patients with epilepsy.

The objective of this study is to evaluate possible long-term effects of treatment with brivaracetam (BRV) on body weight in children with epilepsy. Post hoc analysis of data from patients (aged 1 month to <17 years) with ≥6 months of BRV treatment in a long-term, open-label trial (N01266 [NCT01364597]). Outcomes included body weight and body mass index (BMI) over time (z-score growth curves), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Previous/ongoing medical conditions that may affect body weight (gastrointestinal and metabolic/nutritional disorders); concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) were also evaluated. Two hundred nine patients (mean [standard deviation] age 7.9 [4.6] years) were analyzed. Most (154 [73.7%]) had focal-onset seizures. At study initiation, median (range) BRV dose was 1.0 (0.4-7.5) mg/kg/day. Overall, 189 (90.4%) patients had a previous or ongoing medical condition (gastrointestinal disorders: 43 [20.6%]; metabolism/nutritional disorders: 26 [12.4%]). Most patients followed z-score curves for body weight and BMI during BRV treatment, although there were outliers in both directions. Incidences of appetite/weight-change TEAEs were low. Twenty-three (11.0%) patients had a TEAE of decreased appetite and 14 (6.7%) had a TEAE of weight decreased. Long-term adjunctive BRV was well tolerated in growing children with no indication of detrimental effects on body weight. Brivaracetam is an antiseizure medication (ASM) used to treat seizures in people with epilepsy. Some ASMs can lead to changes in people's appetite and weight. Knowing the effect a drug has on appetite and weight is particularly important in children. We looked at 209 children with epilepsy taking brivaracetam and studied changes in their body weight and body mass index over time. The number of reported side effects related to appetite or weight change was low. There was no apparent long-term effect on their body weight, even when taking their medical history and use of other ASMs into account.

First-Drug Efficacy and Drug-Resistant Epilepsy Rates in Children With New-Onset Epilepsies: A Multicenter Large Cohort Study.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the first-drug efficacy rate in newly diagnosed children with epilepsies treated with antiseizure medications. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 1003 children (age range: 3-10 years, and the mean duration of follow-up: 22 ± 13 months) with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The following parameters were evaluated: first-drug efficacy rate, first-drug-failure rate, and drug resistance rate in the cohort. Results: The first-drug-failure rate was defined in 335/1003 (33%) of the patients, no seizure control in 315 (31%), and drug withdrawal in 20 (2%). There was no significant difference between the group with focal-onset seizures and the group with generalized onset seizures. The first-drug efficacy rate was 67% in children with focal-onset seizures and 66% in children with generalized-onset seizures. Adjunctive antiseizure medication therapy was initiated in 335 patients-dual therapy with 180 patients (18%) and polytherapy with 155 (15%). Drug-resistant epilepsy was defined as 15% in the follow-up period. Etiology-specific diagnoses of the cohort were structural (n = 165, 17%), genetic (n = 25, 3%), metabolic (n = 15%), immune-infectious (n = 17 (2%), and unknown (n = 781, 77%). With a comparison of the 2 most common etiology subgroups (structural versus unknown), a first-drug efficacy rate of 53% and a higher prevalence of drug-resistant epilepsy at 30% were observed in children with structural etiology. First-drug efficacy was statistically lower in children without well-defined epilepsy syndromes (65%) compared with the rate of those with well-defined epilepsy syndrome (79%). Conclusion: This study revealed a first-drug failure rate (33%) in the presented cohort with a drug-resistance epilepsy rate (15%).

Association of SCN1A Polymorphisms rs3812718 and rs2298771 with Epilepsy.

Background/Objectives: Epilepsy is a brain disease with both environmental and genetic inputs. Ion channel dysfunction seems to be of great significance for abnormal neuronal behavior during epileptic seizures. Within neurons, the voltage-gated sodium channels are crucial proteins contributing to the initiation and propagation of action potentials. The voltage-gated sodium channel α subunit 1 (SCN1A) gene encodes for the α subunit of a voltage-gated ion channel. The aim of the study was to investigate the relation of two common SCN1A variants, i.e., rs3812718 and rs2298771, with distinct epileptic phenotypes in a South-Eastern European population. Methods: DNA was extracted from 214 unrelated participants with focal onset, focal to bilateral tonic-clonic, or generalized onset epileptic seizures and genotyped using real-time PCR (LightSNiP assays) followed by melting curve analysis. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 29.0 for Windows). Results: Genotype frequency distribution analysis indicated an association for the A-allele-containing genotypes of both rs3812718 and rs2298771 polymorphisms of SCN1A with generalized onset seizures and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures versus focal onset seizures. Conclusions: Consequently, the study provides evidence that supports a potential association of the investigated SCN1A polymorphisms with distinct seizure subtype susceptibility in South-Eastern Europeans.

Optogenetic stimulation of dorsal striatum bidirectionally controls seizures.

Engagement of the striatum (caudate/putamen) and other basal ganglia nuclei during seizures was first observed over 75 years ago. Basal ganglia output nuclei, and the substantia nigra pars reticulata, in particular, have well-established anti-seizure effects across a large array of experimental models. However, striatal control of seizures is understudied. To address this gap, we used optogenetic approaches to activate and inactivate neurons in the dorsal striatum of Sprague-Dawley rats submitted to the gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) model of absence epilepsy, amygdala kindling model of temporal lobe epilepsy, and pilocarpine-induced Status Epilepticus (SE). All tests were performed on a within-subject basis. Animals were tested in two different light frequencies (5 Hz and 100 Hz). Open-loop (continuous light delivery) optogenetic activation of the dorsal striatal neurons robustly suppressed seizures in all models. On the other hand, optogenetic silencing of the dorsal striatal neurons increased absence seizure expression and facilitated SE onset but had no effect on kindled limbic seizures. In the GBL model, we also verified if the closed- loop strategy (light delivery in response to seizure detection) would be enough to induce antiseizure effects. On-demand light delivery in ChR2-expressing animals reduced SWD duration, while the same approach in ArchT-expressing animals increased SWD duration. These results demonstrated previously unrecognized anti-absence effects associated with striatal continuous and on-demand neuromodulation. Together, these findings document a robust, bidirectional role of the dorsal striatum in the control of seizure generation and propagation in a variety of seizure models, including focal seizure onset and generalized seizures.

Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor Levels Decrease Under Cenobamate Treatment

BackgroundEverolimus therapy has been approved in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC), for drug-resistant epilepsy as adjunctive therapy. A novel anti-seizure medication is cenobamate, which was approved for adults as adjunctive treatment for focal-onset seizures in drug-resistant epilepsy and is now commonly used in patients with TSC. Drug-drug interactions between cenobamate and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTORi) have not been prospectively evaluated, even though these agents are frequently administered together. MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients with TSC and compared mTORi drug levels before and after treatment initiation with cenobamate. ResultsWe evaluated 20 patients with clinically diagnosed TSC (male: 55%, female: 45%) with a median current age at last visit of 17.0 years (range: 4-41 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 12.5 years). All patients received mTORi treatment of either everolimus (N = 12, 60%) or sirolimus (N = 8, 40%). Cenobamate treatment led to seizure freedom in 2 patients (10%), reduction of seizures in 9 patients (45%) and no change in seizure frequency in 9 patients (45%). Median maximal cenobamate dose was 200 mg (range: 100-500 mg, IQR: 262.5 mg), for example, 3.2 mg/kg/day (range: 0.8-9.5 mg/kg/day, IQR: 3.2 mg/kg/day). Median everolimus levels decreased significantly after cenobamate initiation from 5.1 ng/ml (range: 1.9-11.6 ng/ml, IQR: 3.8 ng/ml) to 3.4 ng/ml (range: 1-7.9 ng/ml, IQR: 1.7 ng/ml, P = 0.01221). The median sirolimus level did not decrease significantly (P = 0.3828). ConclusionEverolimus levels decreased following cenobamate initiation. This is likely due to CYP3A4 induction of cenobamate. We recommend monitoring of serum plasma levels of mTORi co-administered with cenobamate and adjustment of mTORi doses accordingly.

The sixth sense: how much does interictal intracranial EEG add to determining the focality of epileptic networks?

Intracranial EEG is used for two main purposes: to determine (i) if epileptic networks are amenable to focal treatment and (ii) where to intervene. Currently, these questions are answered qualitatively and differently across centres. There is a need to quantify the focality of epileptic networks systematically, which may guide surgical decision-making, enable large-scale data analysis and facilitate multi-centre prospective clinical trials. We analysed interictal data from 101 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent pre-surgical evaluation with intracranial EEG at a single centre. We chose interictal data because of its potential to reduce the morbidity and cost associated with ictal recording. Sixty-five patients had unifocal seizure onset on intracranial EEG, and 36 were non-focal or multi-focal. We quantified the spatial dispersion of implanted electrodes and interictal intracranial EEG abnormalities for each patient. We compared these measures against the '5 Sense Score,' a pre-implant prediction of the likelihood of focal seizure onset, assessed the ability to predict unifocal seizure onset by combining these metrics and evaluated how predicted focality relates to subsequent treatment and outcomes. The spatial dispersion of intracranial EEG electrodes predicted network focality with similar performance to the 5-SENSE score [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.57, 0.78)], indicating that electrode placement accurately reflected pre-implant information. A cross-validated model combining the 5-SENSE score and the spatial dispersion of interictal intracranial EEG abnormalities significantly improved this prediction [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.70, 0.88); P < 0.05]. Predictions from this combined model differed between surgical- from device-treated patients with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.68, 0.85) and between patients with good and poor post-surgical outcome at 2 years with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.56, 0.85). Spatial measures of interictal intracranial EEG abnormality significantly improved upon pre-implant predictions of network focality by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and increased sensitivity in a single-centre study. Quantified focality predictions related to ultimate treatment strategy and surgical outcomes. While the 5-SENSE score weighed for specificity in their multi-centre validation to prevent unnecessary implantation, sensitivity improvement found in our single-centre study by including intracranial EEG may aid the decision on whom to perform the focal intervention. We present this study as an important step in building standardized, quantitative tools to guide epilepsy surgery.

Cenobamate as an Early Adjunctive Treatment in Drug-Resistant Focal-Onset Seizures: An Observational Cohort Study.

Cenobamate (CNB) is a new antiseizure medication (ASM) to treat drug-resistant, focal-onset seizures. Data on its use in early therapy lines are not yet available, and clinicians frequently consider CNB to be a later ASM drug choice. We investigated the efficacy and safety of CNB as an early adjunctive treatment in drug-resistant, focal-onset seizures. The study population were patients with drug-resistant, focal-onset seizures who were initiated with CNB after they did not respond to two or three lifetime ASMs, including all prior and concomitant ASMs. These patients were matched (1:2) by sex, age, and seizure frequency to controls who were initiated with any ASM other than CNB. All participants participated in the Mainz Epilepsy Registry. We evaluated the retention rate after 12 months of CNB and after each new adjunctive ASM in the control group. In addition, seizure freedom and the response rate (reduction of seizure frequency by ≥ 50% from baseline) after 12 months were estimated. We included 231 patients aged 44.4 ± 15.8 years. Of these, 33.3% (n = 77) were on CNB, 19.0% (n = 44) on valproate (VPA), 17.3% (n = 40) on lacosamide (LCS), 16.4% (n = 38) on levetiracetam (LEV), and 13.9% (n = 32) on topiramate (TPM). The highest retention rate after 12 months since the beginning of the early adjunctive therapy was observed on CNB (92.0%), compared with LCS (80.0%), LEV (73.3%), VPA (68.2%), or TPM (62.5%) (p < 0.05). Seizure freedom and response rate were also the best on CNB (19.5% and 71.4%, respectively) compared with other ASMs (8.3% and 52.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). No significant differences in adverse events between CNB and other ASMs were observed. Our study provides evidence that CNB is an effective ASM with a good safety profile in the early therapy lines of drug-resistant, focal-onset seizures. This data should support medical decision making in the management of patients with refractory epilepsy. NCT05267405.

Deep brain stimulation of hippocampus in treatment of refractory temporal lobe epilepsy.

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common cause of focal onset seizures, affecting 40% of adolescents and adults with epilepsy. TLE is also one of the most common drug resistant forms of epilepsy. Surgical resection remains the treatment of choice for TLE, but not all patients with TLE are suitable candidates for resective neurosurgery. For such patients, deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the hippocampus remains a reversible and efficient treatment alternative. We undertook a systematic review of the literature on hippocampal DBS efficacy and safety in the management of patients with TLE. A search using two electronic databases, the Medical Literature, Analysis, and Retrieval System on-line (MEDLINE) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CEN-TRAL), was conducted. We found 14 articles related to hippocampal DBS for the treatment of TLE. The responder rate (defined as at least 50% reduction in seizure frequency) for all patients was 83.4%, Of 99 patients treated by hippocampal DBS, 82 were regarded as responders, and 17 as non-responders. Hippocampal DBS appears to be a safe and efficacious treatment alternative for patients who are not candidates for temporal lobectomy or selective amygdalohippocampectomy due to serious postoperative cognitive deficits. In selected patients with TLE, this neuromodulatory therapy may be very safe and efficacious.

Adjunctive cenobamate in people with focal onset seizures: Insights from the Italian Expanded Access Program.

This study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness/tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate, variations in the load of concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) and predictors of clinical response in people with focal epilepsy. This was a retrospective study at 21 centers participating in the Italian Expanded Access Program. Effectiveness outcomes included retention and responder rates (≥50% and 100% reduction in baseline seizure frequency). Tolerability/safety outcomes included the rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and their incidence. Total drug load was quantified as the number of concomitant ASMs and total defined daily dose (DDD). Concomitant ASMs were also classified according to their mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic interactions to perform explorative subgroup analyses. A total of 236 subjects with a median age of 38 (Q1-Q3 = 27-49) years were included. At 12 months, cenobamate retention rate was 78.8% and responders were 57.5%. The seizure freedom rates during the preceding 3 months were 9.8%, 12.2%, 16.3%, and 14.0% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. A higher percentage of responders was observed among subjects treated with clobazam, although the difference was not statistically significant. A total of 223 AEs were recorded in 133 of 236 participants, leading to cenobamate discontinuation in 8.5% cases. At 12 months, a reduction of one or two concomitant ASMs occurred in 42.6% and 4.3% of the subjects. The median total DDD of all concomitant ASMs decreased from 3.34 (Q1-Q3 = 2.50-4.47) at baseline to 2.50 (Q1-Q3 = 1.67-3.50) at 12 months (p < .001, median percentage reduction = 22.2%). The highest rates of cotreatment withdrawal and reductions in the DDD were observed for sodium channel blockers and γ-aminobutyric acidergic modulators (above all for those linked to pharmacokinetic interactions), and perampanel. Adjunctive cenobamate was associated with a reduction in seizure frequency and in the burden of concomitant ASMs in adults with difficult-to-treat focal epilepsy. The type of ASM associated did not influence effectiveness except for a favorable trend with clobazam.

Treatment simplification to optimize cenobamate effectiveness and tolerability: A real-world retrospective study in Spain.

This study aimed to explore the impact of co-antiseizure medication (co-ASM) optimization on the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate (CNB) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in a real-world setting. This unicentric, retrospective, observational study included adults with focal-onset seizures who had received ≥2 previous ASMs. The main effectiveness endpoints included responder rates and seizure frequency reduction at 3, 6, and 12-month visits. The number of co-ASMs and defined daily dose (DDD) were analyzed at every visit. Safety endpoints included adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Thirty-four patients with a median epilepsy duration of 22 years and a median of 15.5 seizures/month were analyzed. The median number of prior ASMs was 12, and the mean number of co-ASMs was 2.9 (SD 1). There was a reduction in seizure frequency/month from baseline to the last visit (p < 0.0001). Between baseline and the end of the study, the mean number of co-ASMs in the per-protocol (PP) population was reduced from 2.9 to 1.6 (p < 0.0001), and DDD was reduced from 3.6 to 1.4 (p < 0.0001). Sodium channel blockers (carbamazepine and lacosamide) and GABAergic drugs (clobazam) were the agents with the most significant reductions in DDD after 12 months. The percentage of patients in the PP population with ≥3 co-ASMs was reduced from 61.8% at baseline to 14.3% at 12 months; 1 patient was receiving CNB as monotherapy at the last visit. At the last visit, 85.7% of the PP population were ≥50% responders, and 33.3% were seizure-free. The percentage of patients with ADRs in the PP population was 71.9% at 3 months and 52.3% at 12 months. Following rational polytherapy, optimization of co-ASM management during CNB treatment allowed high seizure freedom rates despite meaningful reductions in co-medication, while also achieving both good tolerability and patient satisfaction scores in a highly drug-resistant population. Many patients with epilepsy still have seizures, even after being treated with several different epilepsy drugs. In this study of 34 patients from a Spanish clinic, we show that the epilepsy drug cenobamate can reduce the number of seizures in these patients, even after many other epilepsy drugs have failed. We also show that patients treated with cenobamate can reduce the dose or even stop taking certain other epilepsy drugs. This allows them to simplify their treatment and reduce adverse effects while still keeping control of their epilepsy.

Cenobamate add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Although most people with epilepsy achieve complete seizure cessation, approximately one-third of those with the condition continue experiencing seizures despite the use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) given as monotherapy or polytherapy. In this review, we summarised the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) about cenobamate as an add-on treatment for focal epilepsy uncontrolled by one or more concomitant ASMs. To assess the efficacy and tolerability of add-on oral cenobamate for the treatment of drug-resistant focal-onset seizures, defined as seizures persisting despite treatment with one or more ASMs. We searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) and MEDLINE Ovid (September 2022). In addition, we contacted the manufacturer of cenobamate and experts in the field to enquire after any ongoing or unpublished studies. RCTs comparing add-on cenobamate to placebo or another ASM in people with focal epilepsy uncontrolled by one or more concomitant ASMs. Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted data, performed risk of bias assessment, and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Our primary outcomes were at least a 50% reduction in total seizure frequency, seizure freedom, and the occurrence of adverse events. We used an intention-to-treat approach for our primary analyses. For each outcome we estimated summary risk ratios (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We summarised the estimates of effects and certainty of the evidence for each outcome in a summary of findings table. We included two studies (659 adult participants, 442 allocated to cenobamate and 217 to placebo). The overall RR for at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency for add-on cenobamate at any dose compared to placebo was 2.17 (52% versus 24%, 95% CI 1.66 to 2.84; 2 studies, 605 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The RR for seizure freedom for add-on cenobamate at any dose compared to placebo was 4.45 (16% versus 5%, 95% CI 2.25 to 8.78; 2 studies, 605 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The RR for the occurrence of adverse events for add-on cenobamate at any dose compared to placebo was 1.14 (77% versus 67%, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.27; 2 studies, 659 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We judged the two included RCTs as at low or unclear risk of bias. Both studies were sponsored by the drug company that produces cenobamate. Add-on cenobamate is probably better than placebo in reducing the frequency of seizures by at least 50% and in achieving seizure freedom in adults with focal epilepsy uncontrolled by one or more concomitant ASMs (moderate level of certainty). Its use is probably associated with an increased risk of adverse events (moderate level of certainty). Further prospective, controlled trials are required to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of add-on cenobamate compared to other ASMs. The efficacy and tolerability of cenobamate as adjunctive treatment for focal epilepsy in children should be further investigated. Finally, the long-term efficacy and tolerability of add-on cenobamate treatment in people with other epilepsy types (e.g. generalised epilepsy) or specific epilepsy syndromes, as well as its use as monotherapy, require additional study.

Clinical pharmacy and telemedicine: an opportunity to improve epilepsy management.

Clinical pharmacy, as defined by the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy, is a comprehensive professional practice encompassing all pharmacist profiles regardless of the setting. It focuses on promoting optimal drug utilization for patient-centric clinical outcomes. Telemedicine leverages information and communication technologies for remote healthcare delivery, bridging geographical gaps. The integration of clinical pharmacy and telemedicine is crucial in modern healthcare paradigms, especially for patients with chronic illnesses. In 2021, marketing authorization was granted for cenobamate as adjunctive treatment for focal-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization in adults with epilepsy who have not been adequately controlled despite a history of treatment with at least two antiepileptic medicinal products. This review emphasizes the synergistic role of clinical pharmacists and neurologists in utilizing telemedicine for patient counselling, drug information dissemination, adverse drug reaction surveillance, and personalized medication management within the context of epilepsy care. This integration could enhance patient safety, therapeutic outcomes and address socio-economic challenges faced by chronic patients.

Hot water epilepsy with alone and spontaneous seizures in childhood

ObjectivesHot water epilepsy (HWE) is a type of epilepsy that primarily affects children. This study was aimed to evaluate the clinical, electroencephalogram (EEG), neuroimaging findings, and treatment options in children with HWE. MethodsThe medical records of 24 patients who had HWE were evaluated retrospectively. ResultsThere were 2767 patients diagnosed with epilepsy during the seven-year period, and 0.86 % of the patients had HWE. The median age of the patients was three (range 1.2–7 years), with a male predominance (male/female ratio: 7.1). Six patients (25 %) had HWE with spontaneous seizures (HWESS) and 18 patients (75 %) had HWE alone (HWEA). 11 patients had focal onset seizures, 13 patients had generalized onset seizures. EEG abnormalities were found in 7 patients (29.2 %). Three patients (12.5 %) had nonspecific MRI findings. Developmental abnormalities (autism spectrum disorder, learning disability and speech disturbance.) were detected in 8 patients (33.3 %). Only one patient's (4.2 %) seizure could be controlled by changing bathroom habits. Twenty-three patients (95.8 %) were given antiepileptic drugs. 18 of 24 patients had come for follow-up visits for two years, nine of them used monotherapy and seizures did not recur. The treatment response was 55.5 %. Oxcarbazepine (8 patients, 33.3 %) and valproic acid (7 patients, 29.2 %) were the most chosen two drugs for HWE. The genetic tests performed were not accepted relevant to the patients' clinical conditions and epilepsy. ConclusionThe frequency of the HWE was not as high in the literature. Male predominance, EEG abnormalities may be seen. Changing bath room habits did not improve the treatment as a first line management, all the patients except one used antiepileptic drug treatment. Until now, there has been no study in Turkey showing the frequency of HWE exclusively in children.

The cenobamate KORK study-A prospective monocenter observational study investigating cenobamate as an adjunctive therapy in refractory epilepsy, with comparisons to historical cohorts treated with add-on lacosamide, perampanel, and brivaracetam.

In Europe, cenobamate has been approved for use as an adjunctive therapy in adult patients with epilepsy (PWE) with focal-onset seizures (FOS) who have not responded satisfactorily to treatment with at least two antiseizure medications (ASMs). Pivotal trials and real-world observational studies have demonstrated a high efficacy of cenobamate, even in very difficult-to-treat epilepsies. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy of add-on cenobamate in adult PWE who were prospectively monitored. We compared these results with those previously obtained for add-on lacosamide, perampanel, and brivaracetam therapy. Patients were enrolled from the CENKORK study, which is a prospective, non-interventional, open-label, monocenter cohort study of adult PWE experiencing FOS. The titration of cenobamate was performed according to the guidelines outlined in the summary of product characteristics. The primary outcome measure was the retention rate at 6 months and 1 year. In addition, we assessed seizure-free rates, the proportion of patients achieving at least a 50% seizure reduction, adverse events, and the reasons for treatment discontinuation. These outcome measures were compared with historical controls treated with adjunctive lacosamide, perampanel, or brivaracetam at our center. Between June 2021 and 2022, 172 PWE with ongoing FOS were included. 22 cases were lost to follow-up, leaving 150 cases for the 1-year assessment. The retention rates at 6 months and 1 year were 88.7% and 80%, respectively. Seizure freedom was achieved in 14% of patients at both the 6-month and 1-year marks, while the ≥50% responder rates were 50% and 61%, respectively. The 6-month retention rate was significantly higher in cenobamate than in other ASMs (p < 0.001 for each comparator). Adverse events were significantly more common with perampanel (p < 0.001). Add-on cenobamate proved to be particularly efficacious compared to our experience with other recently introduced ASMs. This observational study was carried out in 172 adult patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy who were treated with adjunctive cenobamate. After 1 year, the data of 150 patients could be analyzed. Seizure freedom, in the preceding 3 months, was achieved in 14%. The rate of PWE continuing cenobamate was 80%. In our hands, cenobamate showed promising efficacy and tolerability even when compared to other recently introduced antiseizure medications.