Fluoroscopy-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Research Articles

Ultrasound-guided renal puncture followed by endoscopically guided tract dilatation vs standard fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy for non-opaque renal stones; a randomized clinical trial.

This study was designed to evaluate the non-inferiority of ultrasound puncture followed by endoscopically guided tract dilatation compared to the standard fluoroscopy-guided PCNL. Forty patients with non-opaque kidney stones eligible for PCNL were randomly divided into two groups. The standard fluoroscopy-guided PCNL using the Amplatz dilator was performed in the XRAY group. In the SONO group, the Kidney was punctured under an ultrasound guide followed by tract dilatation using a combination of the Amplatz dilator based on the tract length and an endoscopically guided tract dilatation using a bi-prong forceps in cases of short-advancement. The primary outcome was successful access. In 90% of cases in the XRAY and 95% in the SONO group access dilatation process was performed uneventfully at the first attempt (p = 0.5). In 45% of cases in the SONO group, bi-prong forceps were used as salvage for short-advancement. In one case in the X-ray group over-advancement occurred. One month after surgery, the stone-free rate on the CT-scan was 75% for the X-ray group and 85% for the SONO group (p = 0.4). There were no significant differences in operation time, hospitalization duration, transfusion, or complication rates between the two groups. We conclude that ultrasound-guided renal puncture, followed by endoscopically guided tract dilatation can achieve a high success rate similar to X-ray-guided PCNL while avoiding the harmful effects of radiation exposure and the risk of over-advancement.

Robotic Precision vs. Human Dexterity—Benchtop Comparative Study of Free-Hand vs. Robotic-Assisted Puncture in Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard procedure for treating large kidney stones, especially those measuring over 20 mm or staghorn stones. Accurate placement of the tract into the renal collecting system of interest is crucial. Objective: To compare the free-hand puncture technique with robotic-assisted puncture during fluoroscopy-guided PCNL on a phantom kidney model in terms of efficiency and safety. A self-assessment of confidence levels after each puncture was recorded. Study Design: This prospective single-center benchtop study was conducted at the University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC). Four urological residents participated and performed phantom punctures using both the free-hand bull’s eye technique and the automated needle targeting system with X-ray (ANT-X). Each resident performed a total of 60 punctures on the renal phantom models, with 30 punctures using the free-hand technique and 30 punctures using the ANT-X robotic-assisted system. Results: A total of 240 needle insertions were conducted, with 120 in the ANT-X group and 120 in the free-hand group. The success rate of needle insertions was 100% in both groups. However, the study revealed that the ANT-X group required, on average, an additional 51 s for needle puncture compared to the free-hand group (p < 0.001). In terms of fluoroscopic exposure, the ANT-X group exhibited significantly lower radiation exposure compared to the free-hand group (p < 0.001). Sub-analysis showed that puncture time remained consistent regardless of the technique used, but fluoroscopic screening time decreased with increasing participant experience. The ANT-X group also resulted in significantly lower radiation exposure during initial sessions compared to the free-hand technique. Surgeons’ self-assessment of confidence levels indicated a high level of confidence in needle puncture. Conclusions: Our benchtop study comparing the efficacy and safety between free-hand and ANT-X phantom punctures revealed comparable results. The needle puncture technique facilitated by the ANT-X system showed promising results in terms of reducing fluoroscopic exposure, albeit at the cost of longer operative times. This technology holds promise for novice surgeons who are in the early stages of their learning curve and might be useful for experienced surgeons looking to reduce radiation exposure.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus conventional c-arm-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized comparative study

BackgroundUltrasound guidance for renal access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a safe, effective, and low-cost procedure. The current study compared the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided PCNL (US-PCNL) for renal stone therapy versus fluoroscopy-guided PCNL (FL-PCNL) in prone position.ResultsSuccessful puncture was attained in all cases in both groups. Unlike fluoroscopy, US guidance reduced the time needed for achieving renal puncture that was (22.45 ± 6.95 s) compared to fluoroscopy that was (68.28 ± 56.76 s) (P value < 0.001). The mean duration of access that was reported in our study was (3.92 ± 0.72 min) in the US-PCNL group and (4.03 ± 0.77 min) in the FL-PCNL group (P value 0.460). There was no significant difference in the total operative time between both groups in our study as the mean operative time in the US-PCNL group was (61.47 ± 6.07 min) and (65.86 ± 20.86 min) in the FL-PCNL group with a (P value of 0.349). Stone-free rate was nearly similar in both groups (P value 0.336). Three cases in our study in the FL-PCNL group had bleeding that required blood transfusion post-operative; mean Hb change was 0.23 g/dL and 0.55 g/dL in US-PCNL and FL-PCNL groups, respectively, which is clinically irrelevant despite statistical significance (P value 0.007). Mean fluoroscopy time was (6.38 ± 3.84) minutes in FL-PCNL group.ConclusionUltrasound guidance is a reliable tool in the hands of experienced urologists in performing PCNL with less or even zero radiation.

Correlation Between the Grade of Hydronephrosis with Surgical Outcomes After Ultrasound-guided Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Retrospective Observational Study.

The preferred therapy for staghorn stones and large kidney stones is percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Ultrasound-guided PCNL has definite advantages over fluoroscopy-guided PCNL. Preoperative characteristics are essential to assess better surgical outcomes. The goal of this study was to analyze the correlation of hydronephrosis with surgical outcomes after ultrasound-guided supine PCNL. A retrospective study was conducted at Doris Sylvanus General Hospital. Data of the patients was obtained from hospital records. Hundred and five patients underwent ultrasound-guided PCNL in the supine position from August 2020 to August 2022. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16.0. The presence of hydronephrosis was 85 (80.95%), which consisted of Grade I 15 (14.30%), Grade II 25 (23.80%), Grade III 28 (26.70%), and Grade IV 17 (16.20%). In our study analysis, complications occurred in 16 patients (15.23%). Grade I complications of the Clavien-Dindo classification was of in 4 cases, 11 cases of grade 2 complications, and 1 patient died. The statistical result was the relationship between grade hydronephrosis and the grade of complication using the modified Clavien-Dindo system. We found a p-value of 0.207 (>0.05), and there is no statistically significant relationship p=0.382 and r=-0.086 was a negative correlation. There is also no statistically significant relationship between hydronephrosis and stone clearance with p=0.310. The use of ultrasonographic guidance PCNL has been reported as a safe and effective procedure for the management of large renal stones. In this study, there was no correlation or signification between hydronephrosis and surgical outcome after ultrasound-guided supine PCNL.

Comparison between Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) at Raden Mattaher Jambi Hospital

PurposeTo investigate the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) compared to the standard fluoroscopy-guided PCNL.MethodsThis study is a comparative retrospective study obtained from medical records within the last 5 years of Raden Mattaher Hospital, Jambi. Patients were divided into 2 groups, fluoroscopy- and ultrasonography-guided PCNL with large kidney stone > 20 mm. Patient characteristics were divided into pre- and post-operative procedures and analyzed using SPSS ver. 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov–Smirnov, chi-square and/ Fischer’s exact test and p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsOf 201 patients’ data from medical records were divided into ultrasound-guided and fluoroscopy-guided groups. Ultrasound-guided group were consisted of 89 patients and fluoroscopy-guided were of 112 patients. US Guided significantly identifies the severity of hydronephrosis compared to PCNL. The demographic data obtained age, sex, body mass index, and preoperative hemoglobin levels showed a normal distribution. On the post-operative results, significant results occurred in post-PCNL stent placement. Installation of a DJ stent alone is more commonly performed on fluoroscopy-guided PCNL procedures compared to ultrasound-guided PCNL. This had a positive impact on post-procedure outcomes, meaning that the post-operative outcome of ultrasound-guided PCNL was better than that of fluoroscopy-guided PCNL.ConclusionThe reported data demonstrate that PCNL and ultrasound-guided has similar efficacy and complication rates with PCNL fluoroscopy-guided. This could be a good alternative in urological centers with no access to fluoroscopy. However, ultrasound-guided group was still associated with higher rate nephrostomy tube placement and longer surgery duration.

Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy as imaging guidance for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To determine whether the outcomes of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UG-PCNL), an alternative to traditional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (FG-PCNL), are comparable. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was carried out to discover investigations comparing UG-PCNL to FG-PCNL, and accordingly, a meta-analysis of those studies was performed. The primary outcomes included the stone-free rate (SFR), overall complications based on Clavien-Dindo classification, duration of surgery, duration of patients' hospitalization, and hemoglobin (Hb) drop during the surgery. All statistical analyses and visualizations were implemented utilizing R software. Nineteen studies, including eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and eleven observational cohorts, comprising 3016 patients (1521 UG-PCNL patients) and comparing UG-PCNL with FG-PCNL met the inclusion criteria of the current study. Considering SFR, overall complications, duration of surgery, duration of hospitalization, and Hb drop, our meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between UG-PCNL and FG-PCNL patients, with p-values of 0.29, 0.47, 0.98, 0.28, and 0.42, respectively. Significant differences were discovered between UG-PCNL and FG-PCNL patients in terms of the length of time they were exposed to radiation (p-value< 0.0001). Moreover, FG-PCNL had shorter access time than UG-PCNL (p-value = 0.04). UG-PCNL provides the advantage of requiring less radiation exposure while being just as efficient as FG-PCNL; thus, this study suggests prioritizing the use of UG-PCNL.

Fluoroscopy screening time and radiation dose during complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is procedure of choice for treatment of large urinary tract calculi. This study aimed to investigate the affecting factors on fluoroscopy screening time (FST) and radiation dose (RD) of patients undergoing complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL). Analytic cross-sectional study was performed on 355 patients who underwent csPCNL. The correlation between the FST and RD and patients' demographics, stone characteristics, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative parameters were assessed. Multivariate regression analysis was used to explore various parameters which affect FST and RD. Of all 355 patients, 191 (54.65%) were male and 161 were (45.35%) female with mean age of 48.29 ± 12.38 (16-82) years. BMI was 27.61 ± 4.53 (16.61-39.00) kg/m2. The mean operative time was 45.87 ± 18.29min with mean FST of 101.72 ± 62.00s. BMI, operative time, success rate, complications, stone number, and tract number had a significant relationship with FST and RD (P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, BMI, tract number and success rate were found to be independent predictors for FST and RD. Age, gender, operation side, GFR, target calyx, lithotripsy history, stone opacity, size and site, stone configuration and distribution, and hydronephrosis did not have any correlation with FST and RD (P > 0.05). BMI, success rate and tract number can be significant predictor for FST and RD during csPCNL. Identifying the affecting factors on FST and RD can help the surgeon to minimize the danger of radiation exposure by predicting and preoperative planning.

Reduction of Radiation Dose Received by Surgeons and Patients During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A New Shielding Method.

Due to high prevalence of urolithiasis, endourologic interventions have increased for the treatment of patients with urinary stones. During fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), the surgeon and the patient are exposed to X-ray and its harmful effects. This study aimed to assess the reduction of the radiation dose received by surgeons and patients after using a new shielding method. In this study, the dose of radiation exposure by the surgeon and patient during PCNL under fluoroscopic procedure with conventional shielding methods was compared to a new shielding method designed by the researcher. For this purpose, shields and lead cones with a thickness of 0.5 mm were used. Also, to evaluate the dose of radiation received by surgeons and patients in different parts of the body, thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were used. By using the new shielding method, a 37 ± 2% reduction was found in the dose exposure as compared to the conventional shielding method. The maximum reduction in radiation dose was specified to the surgeon's hands, while the lowest reduction in radiation dose was related to the surgeon's thyroid gland. The maximum and minimum reductions in radiation exposure for patients were specified to patients' feet and chest respectively. There is a significant difference between the total dose received by the surgeons and the patients following the use of the new shielding method and the standard shielding method. The new shielding method can reduce 37 ± 2% of the x-ray received by the patient and the surgeon during fluoroscopy-guided PCNL.

X-ray-free ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative study with historical control

PurposeTo compare the outcomes and complications of supine X-ray-free ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (XG-PCNL) with fluoroscopy-guided (FG)-PCNL in both prone and supine positions.MethodsThis was a comparative study that included a prospective cohort and historical control groups. This study analysed 40 consecutive patients who undergone supine XG-PCNL between October 2019 and March 2020. The control groups were composed of historical control formed from the last 40 consecutive patients who underwent FG-PCNL in both supine and prone positions from our PCNL database from January 2018 and September 2019. Patients’ demographics, stone characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared.ResultsA total of 120 patients were classified into the supine XG-PCNL, supine FG-PCNL, and prone FG-PCNL groups (each N = 40). They had similar baseline characteristics and initial stone burden. The supine XG-PCNL group had higher puncture attempts, nephrostomy tube placement, and longer surgery duration than both the supine and prone FG-PCNL groups. However, the stone-free rate was similar in all groups (85%, supine XG-PCNL; 72.5%, supine FG-PCNL; 77.5% prone FG-PCNL; p = 0.39). No significant difference was found in the complication rate and length of stay among the three groups.ConclusionSupine XG-PCNL is an alternative to both supine and prone FG-PCNL with similar efficacy and complication rates for kidney stone patients. This could be a good alternative to urological centres with no access to fluoroscopy.

Techniques - Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: How we do it.

Ultrasonography has emerged as an alternative to fluoroscopy for image-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in many countries. Compared to fluoroscopy-guided PCNL (F-PCNL), ultrasound-guided PCNL (US-PCNL) is easier to learn and reduces radiation exposure to patients and providers. Despite these advantages, uptake of ultrasound-guided PCNL (US-PCNL) in Canada has been almost nonexistent, largely because it is not incorporated into urologists' training. In this article, we seek to familiarize Canadian urologists with this approach by describing our step-by-step technique for US-PCNL. Additionally, we provide keys to successful implementation of this technique.

Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided (UG) versus fluoroscopy-guided (FG) percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). A systematic search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that compared UG-PCNL with FG-PCNL, and a meta-analysis of those studies was completed. The primary outcomes assessed were stone-free rate (SFR) and complication rate. Secondary outcomes assessed were the successful access-creation rate, time necessary for entrance into the target calyx, auxiliary procedure rate, transfusion rate, hemoglobin decrease after surgery, surgery duration, and hospital stay. Eight studies comprising 966 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with FG-PCNL, UG-PCNL had comparable stone-free rates [odds ratio (OR) 0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.35; p = 0.79] irrespective of the patient's position, and a favorable safety profile resulting in a lower complication rate (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.36-0.86; p = 0.009). No statistical difference was found between UG and FG groups in secondary outcomes. UG-PCNL is as effective as FG-PCNL and has the advantage of lower complication rates. In addition, UG-PCNL could be performed with patients in the supine position without compromising its efficacy.

Increasing Body Mass Index Steepens the Learning Curve for Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

ObjectiveTo define how the learning curve for success in ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is impacted by body mass index (BMI). Previous research has shown ultrasound-guided PCNL to be an effective method of nephrolithiasis treatment comparable to fluoroscopy-guided PCNL. A common concern for the ultrasound-guided approach is potential imaging difficulty in the obese patient population. MethodsA prospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing PCNL with ultrasound guidance for renal tract access was performed. Clinical data collected included success in gaining renal access with ultrasound guidance, patient BMI, and clinical outcomes over time. Nonparametric LOWESS regression modeling was performed in R using locally weighted scatterplot smoother (R version 3.3.3) for gradations of patients by BMI group (<30, 30-40, and >40). ResultsA total of 150 cases were examined. Case number and BMI were evaluated as continuous variables. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that BMI (P = .010; OR 0.93) and case number (P<.001; OR 1.03) were significantly correlated with ultrasound success. Sex, age, hydronephrosis, stone type, puncture location, and stone size did not influence success at obtaining ultrasound-only access in a statistically significant fashion. LOWESS regression modeling of the relationship between case number and renal access success depicts that the curve representative of the BMI >40 group is downward and right-shifted relative to the other two groups. ConclusionThe learning curve for successful ultrasound-guided PCNL is impacted by patient’s BMI as well as case number. Increasing BMI makes access more challenging when performing ultrasound-guided PCNL.

Ultrasound Guidance Reduces Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Cost Compared to Fluoroscopy

To examine the cost factors associated with ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and to determine which method can be performed at a lower cost per case. A cost comparison study was performed utilizing clinical data from a prospectively maintained research database. We included the most recent 33 consecutive ultrasound-guided PCNL cases in 2016 and the most recent 40 consecutive fluoroscopy-guided PCNL cases before the operative surgeon transitioned to ultrasound guidance in May 2014. The total operative time and clinical outcomes were examined. Costs were extracted from the institution accounting systems and given a uniform multiplier to protect institutional financial reporting confidentiality. Comparisons were made using the Student t test and the chi-squared test. After excluding outliers, 71 PCNL procedures were included in the analysis. Demographic data and stone characteristics were not different between ultrasound-guided and fluoroscopy-guided groups. However, the mean operative time for ultrasound-guided PCNL was significantly shorter (99.8 ± 27.0 vs 144.9 ± 55.1 minutes, P < .05). When capital equipment costs were included, the mean total cost per case of ultrasound-guided PCNL was approximately 30% less than fluoroscopy-guided PCNL (simulated costs with a uniform multiplier; $5258.90 ± 957.12 vs $7508.60 ± 1163.83, P < .05). Postoperative clinical outcomes were comparable between the 2 groups. When capital costs are included, ultrasound-guided PCNL can produce comparable clinical outcomes to fluoroscopy-guided procedures at a lower cost to the institution. Shorter operative time drives significant savings with the adoption of ultrasound guidance, which may be magnified with increasing case volume. Using ultrasound imaging during PCNL may be more cost-effective compared to fluoroscopy and warrants further study.

Ultrasound Guidance to Assist Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Reduces Radiation Exposure in Obese Patients

To evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on perioperative outcomes and radiation exposure for ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Data were prospectively collected for consecutive patients who underwent PCNL at the University of California, San Francisco, from July 2013 to November 2015. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to their BMI: <25 (normal weight), 25-29.9 (overweight), and >30 (obese) kg/m2. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients who underwent US-guided vs fluoroscopy-guided PCNL. One hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled; 93 cases were performed under US and 42 under fluoroscopic guidance. US successfully guided renal access in 76.9% of normal weight, 79.0% of overweight, and 45.7% of obese patients (P < .05). Mean fluoroscopic screening time and radiation exposure dose were reduced for US compared to fluoroscopy cases across all BMI categories (P < .05). As BMI increased, radiation exposure dose rose disproportionately faster compared to screening time (P < .001). No significant differences among the BMI groups were found with regard to complication rate, hospital stay, and stone-free status. US-guided PCNL may be more difficult in obese patients, but with its use, the overweight and obese experience the largest absolute reduction in radiation exposure. Because these patients are inherently at greater risk for radiation exposure compared to normal weight patients, they may benefit the most from adoption of US for PCNL.

A New Model with an Anatomically Accurate Human Renal Collecting System for Training in Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Access

Obtaining renal access is one of the most important and complex steps in learning percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Ideally, this skill should be practiced outside the operating room. There is a need for anatomically accurate and cheap models for simulated training. The objective was to develop a cost-effective, anatomically accurate, nonbiologic training model for simulated PCNL access under fluoroscopic guidance. Collecting systems from routine computed tomography urograms were extracted and reformatted using specialized software. These images were printed in a water-soluble plastic on a three-dimensional (3D) printer to create biomodels. These models were embedded in silicone and then the models were dissolved in water to leave a hollow collecting system within a silicone model. These PCNL models were filled with contrast medium and sealed. A layer of dense foam acted as a spacer to replicate the tissues between skin and kidney. 3D printed models of human collecting systems are a useful adjunct in planning PCNL access. The PCNL access training model is relatively low cost and reproduces the anatomy of the renal collecting system faithfully. A range of models reflecting the variety and complexity of human collecting systems can be reproduced. The fluoroscopic triangulation process needed to target the calix of choice can be practiced successfully in this model. This silicone PCNL training model accurately replicates the anatomic architecture and orientation of the human renal collecting system. It provides a safe, clean, and effective model for training in accurate fluoroscopy-guided PCNL access.

A study on comparative outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in prone, supine, and flank positions

To compare percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) safety and efficacy in prone, supine, and flank positions. A total number of 150 candidates for PCNL were randomly assigned into prone, supine, and flank groups. Patients in groups 1 and 2 underwent fluoroscopy-guided PCNL in prone and supine positions, respectively, while patients in group 3 underwent ultrasonography-guided PCNL in lateral position. The success rates were 92, 86, and 88 % in prone, supine, and flank positions, respectively (P = 0.7). The mean access duration was 6.9 ± 4.2, 11.1 ± 5.8, and 10.8 ± 4.1 min (P = 0.08), and the mean operation time was 68.7 ± 37.4, 54.2 ± 25.1 and 74.4 ± 26.9 min (P = 0.04) in prone, supine, and flank groups, respectively. Pyelocaliceal perforation occurred in 2 (4 %), 2 (4 %), and 3 (6 %) patients in prone, supine, and flank positions, respectively (P = 1). We believe that PCNL in both supine and flank positions are as safe and relatively effective as prone position in experienced hands. Preference of the surgeon and proper case selection for each procedure is very important and necessary.

Solo Ultrasonography-Guided Percutanous Nephrolithotomy for Single Stone Pelvis

To evaluate the success and outcomes of solo ultrasonography (US)-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for management of a single stone pelvis. From April 2008 to April 2010, the procedure was applied to 34 patients (22 men and 12 women) whose ages ranged from 25 to 55 years (mean 29.5 y) with unilateral single stone pelvis in a moderately to markedly dilated pelvicaliceal system (PCS). The stone size ranged from 20 to 30 mm (mean 24 mm). Middle caliceal puncture and dilation were performed in all cases by an experienced urologist under US guidance with a needle-guided system attached to the side wall of the US probe. The evaluation of the procedure included the success of accessing the stones, the occurrence of intraoperative or postoperative complications, the stone-free rate, and the need for auxiliary maneuver. The access was successful in all cases. Minor intraoperative complications occurred in two cases where PCS perforation was detected and was managed conservatively by Double-J stent insertion for 4 weeks. The only reported postoperative complication was fever in five cases that responded to antibiotic treatment. Thirty-two (94%) patients were stone free on postoperative day 2; significant residual stones (8 and 10 mm) were detected in two patients who underwent shockwave lithotripsy, and they became stone free within 10 days. Solo US-guided PCNL can be performed safely as an alternative to the fluoroscopy-guided PCNL for single stone pelvis in a moderately to markedly dilated PCS by an experienced urologist.

Ultrasonography-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Flank Position Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Prone Position: A Comparative Study

Gaining access to the pyelocaliceal system in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is routinely performed using fluoroscopic guidance with the patient in a prone position. We compared ultrasonography-guided access for PCNL with the patient in the flank position with conventional fluoroscopy-guided access. A total of 60 patients were randomly separated into two 30-patient groups--namely, ultrasonography-guided access with the patient in the flank position as group 1, and fluoroscopy-guided access with the patient in the prone position as group 2. In group 1, the entire procedure was performed under ultrasonography guidance. Successful access was achieved 100% in both groups. The success rate was 86.7% in group 1 and 90% in group 2 (P = 0.45). The residual stone rate (stone >or=4 mm) was 13.3% in group 1 and 10% in group 2. The access duration was 14.5 +/- 2.6 minutes and 9.4 +/- 2.3 minutes in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.05). No significant differences for complications without any adjacent injuries were detected in both groups. Furthermore, the average hospital stay was 2.7 +/- 0.3 and 2.9 +/- 0.3 days accordingly for groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.89). Ultrasonography has a high ability to access calculi more easily through the pyelocaliceal system with the patient in the flank position. It is convenient for urologists, and the return to the supine position is possible easily when necessary. Besides, PCNL under ultrasonography guidance and with the patient in the flank position has high success rates and limited complications; hence, we recommend this technique as an alternative procedure for fluoroscopy-guided PCNL.